Brooklyn Center for Rehabilitation and Residential

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

37.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 205 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 57.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 282 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 60% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 281 beds and averages 273.6 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.71 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.38 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.20 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.92 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 26% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews conducted during the abbreviated surveys (#2652750, and #2610252) the facility failed to ensure that each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents. This was evident for two (2) of five (5) residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) sampled. Specifically, 1). On 10/23/2025, Resident #1 who required a two (2) person mechanical lift transfer out of bed was transferred with one (1) staff only and sustained a fracture of the left hand, and 2). On 09/05/2025, Resident #2 who required a two (2) person mechanical lift transfer out of bed was transferred with one (1) staff only and sustained a fracture of the hip. This resulted in actual harm to Resident #1 and Resident #2 that was not Immediate Jeopardy. The findings are: The facility policy titled 'Accident Incidents' last reviewed 01/01/2024, documents it is the policy of the facility to monitor and evaluate all occurrences of accidents and incidents or adverse events occurring on the facility premises…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification and Complaint (2604985), the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from misappropriation of property. This was evident for one (1) of five (5) residents (Resident #207) reviewed for Abuse out of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, Certified Nursing Assistant #2 removed Resident #207's dresser key from their arm, opened their dresser, removed $250 from Resident #207's wallet and left the room. The findings are: The facility policy titled 'Abuse' revised 7/18/2025 documented the facility prohibits the misappropriation of resident property by anyone including but not limited to staff, family, friends and residents of the facility. The facility has designed and implemented processed which strive to ensure the prevention and reporting of suspected or alleged resident abuse, neglect, mistreatment and or misappropriation of property. Misappropriation-deliberate misplacement, exploitation or wrongfully temporary or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility did not ensure that drugs and biologicals were stored appropriately. This was evident for the Medication Storage Task on Unit 2 and Unit 1 (out of 7 units). Specifically, 1). Medications were left unattended in the Unit 2 nurses station, and 2). Expired medical supplies, enteral feeds, and protein supplement were located in the medication room on Unit 1. The findings are: The facility policy titled 'Medication- Storage' revised 05/02/2024 documented the facility will store medications safely and securely in a manner that maintains the integrity of that product in accordance with the manufacturer recommendation, current standards 0fpractice and federal and state regulation. Expired, discontinued and/or contaminated medication will be removed from the medication storage areas and disposed of in accordance with state federal regulations. With the exception of Emergency Drug Kits, medication include house stock medication will be stored in a locked cabinet, cart or medication room that is accessible only to licensed nursing staff and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (#2652750 and #2610252), the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source are reported immediately but not later than two hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures. This was evident for two (2) out of five (5) residents (Resident #1, Resident #2) reviewed. Specifically, 1). On 10/23/2025, Resident #1 fell to the floor during a transfer with a mechanical lift and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview during the abbreviated survey (#2265750), the facility did not ensure a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident was reviewed and revised based on changing goals, preferences and needs of the resident and in response to current interventions. This was evident for one (1) out of five (5) residents (Resident #1) reviewed. Specifically, the comprehensive care plan for Resident #1 was not reviewed or revised after Resident #1 fell from a mechanical lift during transfer and sustained injury. The finding is: The facility policy titled 'Care Plan Comprehensive' reviewed 8/2/2024 documented assessments of residents are ongoing, and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the resident's conditions change. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included Heart failure and Anxiety. A review of the Minimum Data Set (a resident assessment tool) dated 10/08/2025 documented Resident #1 had intact cognition, and they required dependent assistance for toileting,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews conducted during the abbreviated survey (#2610252) the facility did ensure residents were provided with treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. This was evident for one (1) of five (5) residents (Resident #2) sampled. Specifically, Resident #2, who fell and sustained a fracture of the hip during a mechanical lift transfer from bed, was not assessed and evaluated by a registered nurse before being transferred from the floor back to bed.The findings are: The facility policy titled 'Accident Incidents' last reviewed 01/01/2024, documents it is the policy of the facility to monitor and evaluate all occurrences of accidents and incidents or adverse events occurring on the facility premises which is not consistent with the routine operation of the facility or care of a particular resident. The policy also documented if assistance is needed, summon help and if the employee cannot leave the victim, ask someone to report to the nurse's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-04 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview conducted during the abbreviated survey (2610252), the facility did not ensure residents with limited range of motion receives appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or to prevent further decrease in range of motion. This was evident for one (1) of five (5) residents (Resident #2) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #2 was observed not wearing a right knee or elbow brace as per the plan of care. The findings are:The facility policy titled 'Appliances/Devices - Splints, braces, slings' last updated 09/08/2025 documented the facility will maintain the safe application, monitoring, and maintenance of resident appliances (such as splints, braces, and slings) in accordance with current standards of practice, manufacturer's instruction for use and state and federal regulations.Resident #2 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included Coronary artery disease, Cerebrovascular accident, Hemiplegia (weakness on one side of the body).The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification and Complaint survey from 10/26/23 to 11/2/23, the facility did not ensure safe food storage was practiced to prevent food-borne illness. This was evident during the initial tour of the Kitchen. Specifically, milk past their use by date were located in the kitchen refrigerator. The findings are: The facility policy titled Receiving reviewed 01/2023 documented all items will be checked for appropriate quality and quantity upon receipt. Refrigerated foods date sensitive foods are within sell by or use by date (at a minimum, this date must be after the next delivery date for the product). The facility policy titled Food Storage reviewed 07/19/2023 documented all stock must be rotated with each new order received. Rotating stock is essential to assure the freshness and high quality of all foods. Old stock is always used first (first in-first out method). Supervise the person designated to put stock away to make sure it is rotated properly. Refrigerated food storage: all foods should be labeled and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
  Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey completed from 10/26/23 through 11/2/23, the facility did not ensure that each resident was offered the opportunity to participate in the review of their Comprehensive Care Plans (CCP). This was evident for 2 out of 3 residents reviewed for Care Planning out of a sample of 40 residents. Specifically, Resident #89 and Resident #269 were not invited to participate in their care plan meeting. The findings are: The facility policy and procedure titled Care Plan last revised 10/2019, documented as follows: The Interdisciplinary Team (IDT:), in conjunction with the resident and his/her family or legal representative, develops and implements a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident. 1.Resident #89 was admitted with diagnoses that included Dementia, Hypertension, and Coronary Artery Disease. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented that Resident #89 was moderately cognitively impaired with a Brief…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review during the recertification and abbreviated survey conducted from 10/26/23 to 11/2/2023, the facility did not ensure that a resident with limited mobility received appropriate services and assistance to prevent further contractures. This was evident for 1 of 3 resident reviewed for Position/Mobility out of a sample of 40 residents. (Resident #66). Specifically, Resident #66, who had bilateral hand contractures, was observed without bilateral hand rolls in place as ordered. The findings are: Resident #66 was admitted with diagnoses that included Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, Cerebrovascular Accident, and Muscle Weakness. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented that Resident #66 had severely impaired cognition, required dependent assistance of staff with most Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and . The MDS further documented the resident required total assistance of two plus persons for bed mobility, transfers, and toilet use, total…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0711 — isolated
  Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview during the Recertification and complaint (NY00317301) survey conducted from 10/26/23 to 11/2/23, the facility did not ensure that the physician reviewed the resident's total plan of care including medications and treatments. This was evident for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for Dialysis (Resident #44) and 1 out of 2 residents investigated for Insulin (Resident #236) out of sample of 40 residents. Specifically, 1) there were no orders in place for a resident who received Dialysis and 2). a resident admitted with a diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus received no medications for diabetes management after 5/18/2023, there was no documented evidence finger sticks were monitored after 8/3/2023, and no documented evidence medication coverage was provided for fingerstick over 200mg/dL on multiple occasions, despite multiple medical progress notes consistently documenting resident was on insulin and currently receiving oral hypoglycemics for diabetes. The finding is: 1.The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$9,110 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $9,110 — penalty dated 2025-11-04

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CENTERS HEALTH CARE — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $4.3M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY