Ellicott Center For Rehabilitation And Nursing

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

36.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 57 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 52.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 44 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 53% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 160 beds and averages 157.8 residents a day — about 99% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.480 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.90 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.71 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 61% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-02-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review conducted during a Complaint investigation (Complaint #NY00356490) during a Standard survey completed on 2/13/2025, the facility did not ensure that each resident was free from significant medication errors for one (1) (Resident #202) of four (4) residents reviewed for insulin medications. Specifically, Resident #202 did not receive scheduled insulin doses or have their blood glucose (sugar) monitored per the provider orders. On 10/6/2024. the resident was found unresponsive, nonverbal with a blood glucose of 579 (normal 60 - 110) which resulted in hospitalization for diabetic ketoacidosis (a life-threatening complication of diabetes that occurs when the body does not have enough insulin). Additionally, a nurse inaccurately documented the resident was in the hospital on [DATE] at the time of their scheduled insulin dose and blood glucose monitoring. This resulted in actual harm to Resident #202 that was not Immediate Jeopardy. The finding is: The policy titled Insulin…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-13 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and record review conducted during Complaint investigations (Complaint #s NY00359253 and NY00368473) during the Standard survey completed on 2/13/25, the facility did not ensure that food and drink was palatable, attractive and at a safe and appetizing temperature for three (Cityview, Skyview, and Harborview units) of four test trays. Specifically, food was served during meals at suboptimal temperatures and was not palatable. Residents #3, #55, #63, #65, #96, #104, and #203 were involved. The findings are: The facility policy and procedure titled Food Temperature Policy last reviewed 3/23, documented food sent to remote kitchens for distribution (such as meals, snacks, nourishments, oral supplement) will be transported and delivered to maintain temperatures at or below 41 degrees Fahrenheit for cold foods and at or above 140 degrees Fahrenheit for hot foods. All employees are responsible to notify their supervisor of any food item that does not meet the regulated safe acceptable service ranges (at or below 41 degrees Fahrenheit or above 135 degrees…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the Standard survey completed on 2/13/2025, the facility did not provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment; and did not maintain comfortable temperature levels between 71 degrees Fahrenheit to 81 degrees Fahrenheit for two (Harbor View and City View units) of four units. Specifically, air temperatures were below 71 degrees Fahrenheit in resident rooms and shared resident areas on the Harbor View unit. In addition, shower chairs and the shower floor were observed with dried brown debris on them on the City View and Harbor View units. The findings are: The policy titled Home Like Environment, created 9/19/2022, documented residents were provided with a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment and encouraged to use their own personal belongings to the extent possible. The facility staff and management shall maximize, to the extent possible, the characteristics…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review conducted during Complaint investigations (Complaint #s NY00362643 and NY00369017) during the Standard survey completed on 2/13/25, the facility did not ensure that residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living, received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for two (Residents #39 and #96) of 9 residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident #39 was not gotten out of bed on multiple days and had an unkempt beard. Resident #96 had a moderate amount of long chin hair and jagged dirty fingernails. The findings are: The policy titled Activities of Daily Living Care and Support dated 3/13/24 documented care and support will be provided for residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living independently in accordance with the resident's assessed needs, personal preferences, and individualized plan of care that includes assistance with hygiene (grooming) and mobility (transfers). Nail care should be provided…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews conducted during a Compliant investigation (#NY00359451) during the Standard survey completed on 2/12/25, the facility did not ensure that residents who are fed by enteral means (by way of the intestine to deliver part or all of a person's caloric requirements) received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent possible complications for two (2) (Resident #147 and Resident #39) of two (2) residents reviewed for feeding tubes. Specifically, the facility did not provide the tube feed formula as ordered by the physician. In addition, the nursing staff inaccurately documented the formula was administered as ordered. The findings are: The facility policy and procedure titled Enteral Feedings last reviewed 2/23 documented it was the policy of the facility to provide enteral nutrition therapy to residents unable to obtain nutrition orally, when such therapy was ordered by the physician and not clinically contraindicated. The procedure included instructions…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0694 — isolated
  Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review conducted during the Standard survey, completed on 2/13/25, the facility did not ensure parenteral fluids were administered consistent with professional standards of practice and in accordance with the physician's orders, and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for one (Resident #16) of one resident reviewed for peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC- a long, thin tube that is inserted through a vein in an arm and passed through to the larger veins near the heart) use. Specifically, Resident #16 was readmitted to the facility with a peripherally inserted central catheter in their left upper arm (PICC). There was a lack of physician orders and assessments, for monitoring arm circumference, external length, dressing changes and flushes for the peripherally inserted central catheter. Additionally, the comprehensive care plan was not developed to include the peripherally inserted central catheter. The finding is: The policy titled PICC (peripherally…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review conducted during the Standard survey completed on 2/13/25, the facility did not ensure that residents who require dialysis, received services consistent with professional standards of practice for one (Resident #16) of one resident reviewed. Specifically, Resident #16 did not have ongoing monitoring upon leaving the facility and returning from hemodialysis (treatment that filters waste and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys were unable to). There were no assessments of their access site and there was no communication between the dialysis center and the facility. Additionally, the wrong type of hemodialysis access device was listed on the resident's provider orders. The finding is: The policy titled Dialysis Management, last reviewed 5/2019, documented residents receiving hemodialysis treatments will be assessed and monitored to ensure quality of life and well-being. On admission the resident will be assessed for the type of access device and the site will be observed for function and signs of infection. The facility will…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during a Standard survey completed on 2/13/25, the facility did not ensure that all drugs and biologicals were securely stored in accordance with State and Federal Laws for one of one facility reviewed for medication storage. Specifically, there were two full boxes that contained discontinued prescription medications for 22 residents located in an unsecured first floor conference room. This involved Resident #'s 10, 21, 23, 31, 32, 34, 35, 51, 60, 69, 70, 79, 81, 85, 130, 133, 135, 502, 503, 504, 505, and 506. Additionally, there was one full box of discontinued prescription medications for 32 residents located on the second floor in a Nurse Manager's office that was open and unlocked. This involved Resident #'s 9, 10, 23, 29, 31, 41, 42, 55, 57, 79, 92, 97, 108, 111, 115, 128, 131, 139, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 507, 508, 509, 510, 512, 513, 514, and 515. The findings are: The policy and procedure titled Medication Storage dated 1/2019, documented that medications will be stored in a manner that maintains the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review conducted during a Standard survey completed 2/13/25, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and a comfortable environment, to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for four (4) (Residents #39, #96, #119 and #139) of seven (7) residents observed for hands-on care. Specifically, Resident #39 was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (interventions designed to reduce transmission of multi-drug-resistant organisms including gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities) and staff did not wear a gown during medication and parenteral feed administration through a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube (a method of delivering liquid nutrition fluids and medicine directly into the stomach), staff did not change gloves or wash their hands after providing fecal incontinence care, and prior to touching clean items; and soiled linens were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespread
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during an Abbreviated (#NY00351834) survey completed on 2/7/25, the facility did not provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and the facility did not ensure that drug records were in order and that an account of all controlled drugs are maintained and periodically reconciled for four (River View, Harbor View, City View, and Sky View) of four units. Specifically, on 8/19/24, 93 narcotic (medication used to treat moderate to severe pain) medications were unaccounted for on the River View unit. Additionally, on 2/5/25 one narcotic reconciliation book with the keys to a medication cart and narcotic cupboard were left unattended in the River View medication room, and two narcotic reconciliation books with the keys to 2 medication carts and 2 narcotic cupboards were left unattended in the Sky View medication room. Licensed Practical Nurse #1 was observed to have completed a narcotic reconciliation by themselves without the presence of the nurse going off duty on City View. Furthermore, the controlled…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-13 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review conducted during an Abbreviated survey (Complaint #NY00359366), the facility did not ensure that all residents had the right to formulate advanced directives that would be honored for one (Resident #1) of six residents reviewed. Specifically, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) was implemented for Resident #1 who had a MOLST (Medical Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment) identifying the resident's wishes as Do Not Resuscitate (DNR). The finding is: The policy and procedure titled Advance Directive and State Specific Medical Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment-New York dated [DATE] documented residents have the right to formulate an advance directive and to request, refuse and discontinue treatments. An advance directive is a written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment made to ensue those wishes are carried out should the person be unable to communicate them to a physician. New York State uses the Medical Orders for Life-sustaining Treatment. A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$10,868 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $10,868 — penalty dated 2025-02-07

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CENTERS HEALTH CARE — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY