No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Martine Center For Rehabilitation And Nursing

12 Tibbits Avenue, White Plains, NY 10606 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 225 certified beds · (914) 287-7200 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (914) 287-7200 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Dec 2024
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
122 W Post Rd · (914) 682-8828 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1 Winchester St · (914) 206-1767 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
94 W Post Rd · (914) 684-1772 · Call to confirm hours
Park
120 Fisher Ave · (914) 422-1251 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.9%14.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.7%5.8%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.2%1.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms44.4%19.5%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.0%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.2%12.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication9.3%13.2%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.3%95.3%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.7%6.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.4%19.5%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.2%13.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.4%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine78.9%78.8%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.8%20.6%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.8%9.6%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.011.701.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.211.361.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

40.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 66 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

40.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
56.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.23U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 56.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 48 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 28% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF40.4%CMS range 30.9–54.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.2%CMS range 6.3–12.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge56.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge52.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge33.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting93.3%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened7.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.0%CMS range 3.9–12.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.161.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.67
RN hours/ resident / day
0.96
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.58
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.21
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.43
RN hoursweekends
39.2%
Total nursing turnover
60.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 225 beds and averages 189.5 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 36 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.21 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.67 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.58 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.85 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.36 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.77 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-12)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2023-12-05)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

38 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (2738206) the facility did not ensure that the Minimum Data Set accurately reflected the resident status for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for general skin issues. Specifically, Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and the admission Minimum Data Set staged a wound on the sacrum as stage 2 (two) because it referenced the admission nurse's assessment. On 12/09/2025 the wound care provider assessed the wound as an unstageable wound, but the Minimum Data Set did not reflect this update. The 01/21/2026 Minimum Data Set has the sacral wound as a stage 4 (four).The policy titled MDS 3.0 last revised 8/2019, documented that the MDS 3.0 information will be completed by the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT). Each discipline will be responsible for completion of their sections and will follow the MDS Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual guidelines. All disciplines that make entries on the MDS 3.0 are responsible to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (2738206) the facility did not ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for general skin issues. Specifically, Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with three (3) different wounds in separate locations, the wound on their sacrum was assessed by the admission nurse as a stage two (2) pressure ulcer, but there were no orders in the electronic medical record for care or treatment until 12/12/2025.The policy titled Skin and Pressure Injury Prevention last reviewed 6/2024 documented that the purpose of the procedure is to provide information regarding identification of pressure injury risk factors and interventions for specific risk factors. Under the heading risk assessment, it further documents that step one (1) is to assess the resident on admission/re-admission for existing pressure/injury risk factors utilizing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-01-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews conducted during the recertification survey from 01/05/2026 to 01/12/2026, the facility did not ensure proper storage, preparation, distribution, and service of food in accordance with professional standards for food safety. Specifically, the kitchen refrigerators, freezers, spice/seasoning areas and dry storage areas contained food items that were expired, not labeled or dated with opened/prepared/expiration dates.The findings included: The facility policy titled Food Storage last revised 05/10/2024 documented: Sufficient storage facilities will be provided to keep foods safe, wholesome and appetizing. Food will be stored in an area that is clean, dry and free from contaminants. Refrigerator food storage: All foods should be covered, labeled and dated. All foods will be checked to assure that foods (including leftovers) will be consumed b their safe use-by dates, and frozen (where applicable) or discarded. Frozen foods: All foods should be covered, labeled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility did not ensure the resident's right to be treated with dignity and respect. This was evident for one (Resident #206) of five residents reviewed for Dignity. Specifically, Resident #206 was placed in common areas of the unit while wearing a hospital gown.The findings are:The policy titled Resident Rights dated 05/28/2024 documented residents have a basic right to a dignified existence.Resident #206 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of bipolar disorder and schizoaffective disorder.The Social Work Note dated 01/05/2026 documented Resident #206 was cognitively impaired.On 01/05/2026 at 11:24 AM Resident #206 was observed wearing a hospital gown and using their left hand to grab the bottom of the gown to cover their genital area as they sat amongst four other residents in public view of anyone entering or leaving the unit. Resident #206 remained in the common area until 12:30 PM when a Certified Nurse Aide wheeled Resident #206's wheelchair in the dining room for lunch. There were seven residents eating lunch in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-12 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility did not ensure each resident with a mental disorder was evaluated and received care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs for one (Resident #85) of three residents reviewed for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review. Specifically, Resident #85 was not referred for Level II specialized services once their facility stay was no longer brief or finite.The findings are:Resident #85 was admitted with diagnoses of attention deficit disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, schizoaffective disorder, anxiety, and major depressive disorder.The Hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] documented Resident #85 formerly lived at a group home with a ramp available to enter and had a rolling walker at home. The resident was in usual state of health besides a fall with facial injury caused by vertigo.The Patient Review Instrument dated 09/23/2025 documented Resident #85 required supervision with toileting and was chairfast or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility did not ensure each resident received treatment and care in accordance with the professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #108) reviewed for Skin Conditions. Specifically, 1.) wound care was not provided as per physician order for Resident #108. In addition, Licensed Practical Nurse #1 documented 01/05/2026 through 01/07/2026 administration of wound care that was not provided. The findings included:Resident #108's diagnoses included unspecified cellulitis, chronic venous insufficiency, and idiopathic gout.The quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented Resident #108 was cognitively intact, had no rejection of cares, had no pressure ulcers or venous ulcers and had applications of ointments/medications other than to feet and no dressing applied to feet. A care plan dated 03/03/2025 documented Resident #108 had impaired skin integrity related to a venous…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated survey (#2638932) on 01/05/2026 to 01/12/2026, the facility did not ensure the necessary treatment and services to promote healing and/or prevent new ulcers from developing for 3 of 3 residents (Resident #12, #8 and #169) reviewed for Pressure Ulcers. Specifically, for Resident # 12 with a left buttock stage two pressure ulcer, calcium alginate was not applied as per physician order, 2) for Resident #8 assessed at risk for pressure ulcers, heel offloading was not implemented as per care plan, and 3) for Resident #169 assessed at risk for pressure ulcers, heel offloading was not implemented as per care plan. Additionally, although offloading of Resident #8's heels was not observed on 01/05/2026 and 01/09/2026 the certified nurse aide tasks documented offloading had been provided. The findings include: The policy titled Skin and Pressure Injury Prevention, last revised 06/27/2024, documented: This…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the Recertification and Abbreviated Survey (#2638932), the facility did not ensure each resident received necessary respiratory care in accordance with professional standards of practice for two (2) of three (3) residents (Resident #12 and Resident #149) reviewed for Respiratory Care. Specifically, 1. Resident # 12 did not receive the correct oxygen flow rate of 6 liters per minute as per physician order and 2. Resident #149 did not receive the correct oxygen flow rate of 3 liters per minute as per physician order.The findings include The policy titled Oxygen Therapy Administration reviewed 9/2025 documented oxygen therapy is administered by licensed nurses or respiratory therapists in accordance with healthcare provider orders and in accordance with the state scope of practice and nurse practice act. Method of oxygen delivery includes oxygen concentrator often used for residents who require low flow oxygen on a regular basis. Oxygen delivery system include Venturi (Venti) Mask designed to deliver a specific…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review conducted during the recertification survey from the facility did not ensure that drugs and biologicals were maintained in accordance with current professional standards for storage, labeling and expiration dates. Specifically, 1. observation of the fifth-floor medication cart revealed an insulin pen with no open date or discard date, and 2. one 15-gram tube of triamcinolone cream 0.1%, and one tube of diclofenac gel 1% were on the bedside table in Resident 108's room. The findings include: The policy titled Medication Administration dated 12/2019 documented the expiration date on the medication label must be checked prior to administering. When opening a multi dose container, the date shall be recorded on the container. The policy titled Insulin Administration dated 1/2020 documented check the expiration date, if opening a new vial, record the expiration date and time on the vial (follow manufacturers recommendations for expiration after opening). 1.The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-25 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00338612/591526, NY00355525/591523) the facility did not ensure the environment was functional, sanitary, and comfortable for residents, staff, and the public. Specifically, on every unit in the facility there were multiple areas of chipped paint, scuff marks, visible dirt and stains on the walls and floors, base boards coming off the wall, wallpaper bubbling up and foul odors noted. The findings are:The facility Maintenance-Preventative policy last reviewed 5/2025 documented the facility provides preventative maintenance services to the facility, grounds, and equipment in accordance with current standards of practice and State and Federal Regulations. The Maintenance Director/designee will provide education to the maintenance staff upon hire and as needed regarding the provision of preventative maintenance tasks.During an interview on 6/13/2025 at 11:16 AM the Administrator stated they do environmental rounds two times daily with the Assistant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 28 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview during an abbreviated survey (NY00367889/591527, NY00333553/591524, NY00349962/591497) the facility did not ensure that a comprehensive person-centered care plan was developed and implemented to ensure services were provided to maintain the residents' highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 3 of 5 residents (Resident #1, #2, #5) reviewed for care planning. Specifically, 1) Resident #1 had an unwitnessed fall on 01/1/2025 and sustained skin tears to both arms. Resident #1 had no documented fall risk or actual fall care plan initiated before or after the incident. 2) Resident #2 was noted to have eschar to their left heel on 02/11/2024. Resident #2's pressure injury care plan had not updated with the presence of the left heel eschar, measurements and/or tracking. 3)After a meeting with Resident #5's representatives on 04/18/2025, it was determined the resident would have a two person assist for all cares. Review of Resident #5's self-care care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00367889-591527, NY00367906-591522), the facility did not ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as is possible; and that each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for safety and supervision. Specifically, on 01/01/2025 Resident #1 told Certified Nurse Aide #1 that they needed to get out of bed otherwise they were going to jump out. Certified Nurse Aide #1 left the resident alone in their room after the resident made the statement. When Certified Nurse Aide #1 returned to Resident #1's room, the resident was on the floor. Resident #1 sustained skin tears to both upper extremities.The findings are:The facility Safety and Supervision of Residents policy last reviewed 01/2024 documented the facility-oriented and resident-oriented approaches to safety are used together to implement a systems approach to safety, which considers…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00362050), the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, and neglect are reported immediately but no later than 2 hours to the New York State Department of Health (NYS DOH). This was evident for 1 of 3 residents (Residents #1) reviewed for accidents. Specifically, Resident #1 who was identified to be at risk for elopement on 10/21/2024 left the facility undetected by facility staff on 11/26/2024. The Facility staff did not realize Resident #1 was not in the facility until dinner time (approximately 5:30pm-6pm) and did not report the incident to State Agency Department until 11/27/2024. The findings are: The Facility Policy on Accident-Incidents created 11/2013 documented that it is the facility policy to monitor and evaluate all occurrences of accidents or incidents or adverse event occurring on the facility premises which is not consistent with the routine operation of the facility or care of a particular…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00362050), the facility did not ensure that residents were provided adequate supervision/monitoring to prevent elopement. This was evident for 1 of 3 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for accidents. Specifically, Resident #1 who was identified to be at risk for elopement on 10/12/2024 exited the facility through the front door on 11/26/2024 at approximately 11:30 am undetected by facility staff. The resident was found on 12/2/2024 by Los Angeles Police Department who called the facility to report that the resident was brought to Los Angeles Police Department General Psych for evaluation. The findings are: The Facility Policy on Elopement Prevention created on 7/2024 documented the facility maintains a process to identify residents at risk for elopement, implement preventative strategies for those identified as an elopement risk and conduct a missing resident procedure when necessary. Interventions that may be implemented for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00362050), the facility did not ensure Certified Nurse Aide performance appraisals were completed at least once every 12 months for 2 of 3 Certified Nurse Aides record reviewed. Specifically, performance appraisals were not documented every 12 months for Certified Nurse Aide #2 and #3. The Findings are: The Facility Policy on Employee Evaluations created 9/2019 documented the job performance of each employee shall be reviewed and evaluated at least annually. A performance evaluation will be completed on each employee at least annually. The completed performance evaluation will be placed in the employee's personnel record. Review of Facility Personnel Records revealed Certified Nurse Aide #2 was hired 7/1/2022. There was no documented evidence of any annual performance evaluation since date of hire. Review of Facility Personnel Records revealed Certified Nurse Aide #3 was hired 6/20/2017 and performance evaluation was conducted 9/5/2018. There was no documented evidence that an annual performance evaluation was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-01 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00352478), the facility did not ensure the Minimum Data Set assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 out of 3 residents reviewed for assessments. Specifically, Resident #1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] coded the resident as dependent for all cares with 2-person assistance. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] coded the resident as dependent but requiring a 1 person assist which is not indicative of dependence for care. In addition, staff interview revealed a discrepancy on Resident #1's required assistance with bed mobility and the Certified Nurse Assistant Task Instructions/Accountability did not accurately reflect required assistance for Resident#1. Findings include: The facility Minimum Data Set 3.0 policy dated 5/2017 documented the Resident Assessment Instrument process and requirement procedure are as follows: the assessment accurately reflects the resident's status, the assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview during an abbreviated survey (NY00352478, NY00350699), the facility did not ensure that a comprehensive person-centered care plan was developed and implemented to ensure services were provided to maintain the residents' highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 out of 3 residents reviewed for activities of daily living. Specifically, there was no documented evidence that a comprehensive care plan was initiated after the Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], that documented that the resident was dependent for all cares. In addition, the care plan did not accurately reflect the required assistance for a resident dependent for all cares on the Certified Nurse Assistant Task Instructions/Accountability. Resident #1 fell out of bed while Certified Assistant #1 was providing cares alone without rails and sustained lacerations to the forehead, and right nares and possible cervical fracture. The findings are: The facility Care Plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview during an abbreviated survey ( NY00350699), the facility did not ensure that a comprehensive person-centered care plan was reviewed and revised for 1 out of 3 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for care planning. Specifically, Resident #2 had a self-reported fall on 7/24/2024 and their actual fall care plan was not updated to reflect it. Findings include: The facility Care Plan Comprehensive policy dated 10/2015 and last revised 10/2019 documented the care plan interventions are derived from a thorough analysis of the information gathered as part of the comprehensive assessment. Assessments of the resident are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and resident's condition change, when the resident has been readmitted to the facility from the hospital and at least quarterly with scheduled Minimum Data Sets. Resident #2 initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and last readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including but not limited to Metabolic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview during an abbreviated survey (NY00352478, NY00350699), the facility did not ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as is possible; and that each resident received adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents for 1 out of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. Specifically, on 8/21/2024, Resident #1 who had been identified as totally dependent with cares (helper completes all activities for the resident, resident does not use any of their own strength for any part of the activity), fell off the bed when Certified Nursing Assistant #1 was providing care by themself. Resident #1 sustained an unstable cervical spine C4-C5 fracture and possible left femoral neck fracture with deep forehead lacerations 4.5cm long and 0.1cm depth across forehead, swollen upper lip and gums and right nares. Resident #1's care plan documented resident required 1 person assist. Resident was transferred to the hospital for further medical evaluation. Findings…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview conducted during the Recertification Survey from 11/27/23 to 12/5/23, the facility did not ensure housekeeping and maintenance services were provided to maintain a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment on 3 of 6 units. Specifically, observations included loose toilet seat/commode, spackled walls in halls and rooms in need of paint, broken handrails fixed with tape, walls adorned with various sections displaying black streaks and chipped paint, a hole in a wall, and the pungent smell of urine in multiple rooms. Findings include: 1) Unit 2: During an observation on 11/27/23 at 11:25 AM, on 11/28/2023 at 9:41 AM and 3:00 PM, and on 11/30/2023 at 9:05 AM, Rooms #201 and #218 had an unpleasant smell and the bedsheets were soiled with urine. During an interview on 11/30/23 at 10:05 AM, the Licensed Practical Nurse Unit Manager (LPNUM) #1 stated, there were a lot of residents who required a hoyer lift to get out of bed and it took time to clean their beds. LPNUM #1 stated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-05 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey from 11/27/23 to 12/5/23, the facility did not ensure that resident Minimum Data Set assessments (MDS-an assessment tool) accurately reflected the resident's status. This was evident for 4 of 5 residents (Residents # 138, #5, #77, and #1) reviewed for MDS accuracy. Specifically, 1) the significant change MDS for Resident # 138 did not address that a stage 3 pressure ulcer was present on admission; 2) the MDS for Resident # 5 did not address administration of insulin or antidepressants; 3) the MDS for Resident #77 documented other restraints not used daily, but the resident did not have any documented or observed restraints; and 4) the MDS for Resident #1 documented, 'other restraints not used every day', but the resident did not have any documented or observed restraints. The findings are: A review of the Policy and Procedure, 'MDS 3.0' dated 5/17 documented it is the policy of the facility to follow the guidelines of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-05 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and interview conducted during the Recertification Survey from 11/27/2023 to 12/5/2023, the facility did not ensure a resident was assessed by the interdisciplinary team to determine the resident's ability to safely administer their own medications if clinically appropriate for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #78) reviewed for self-administration of medications. Specifically, Deep Sea/Fluticasone Propionate nasal sprays and Ventolin/Symbicort inhalers were stored at the resident's bedside intended for the resident to self administer their own medications. Findings include: The facility Policy and Procedure, 'Medication-Self Administration' revised 7/2023, documented residents may request to keep medications at the bedside for self-administration in accordance with resident rights. Criteria must be met to determine if a resident is both mentally and physically capable of self-administering medication/s and to keep accurate documentation of these actions. Resident #78 had diagnoses which included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disorder (COPD), Obstructive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-05 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review during the Recertification Survey from 11/27/23 to 12/5/23 it was determined that for one of 2 residents (Resident #129) reviewed for choices, the facility did not ensure that each resident had the right to make choices about aspects of life that were significant to them. Specifically, Resident #129's choice of when to get out of bed in the morning was not consistently honored. Findings include: Resident #129 had diagnoses including Dementia, Schizophrenia, and Mood Disturbance. The 8/21/23 annual Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool) documented Resident #129 had moderately impaired cognition, customary routine and activities including choosing clothing were very important to the resident, and the resident required limited assistance of one person for dressing and transfer. The November 2023 Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) initiated 3/3/22 for resident preferences directed staff to respect and encourage the resident's preferences and choices. During an interview on 11/28/23 at 9:47 AM, Resident #129 stated they would like to remain in bed later…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-05 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview during the Recertification Survey conducted from 11/27/23 to 12/5/23, the facility did not ensure that they provided the appropriate liability and appeal notices to Medicare beneficiaries for 2 of 3 residents (Residents #278 and #600) reviewed for Beneficiary Notification. Specifically, the facility was unable to provide documented evidence that Residents #278, and #600 or their representatives received the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) for Medicare Part A at least two calendar days before Medicare covered services ended as required. Findings include: The CMS form instructions for the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) CMS-10123 (expiration date 8/31/23) documented the NOMNC must be delivered at least two calendar days before Medicare covered services end or the second to last day of service if care is not being provided daily. Resident # 278's Medicare Part A skilled services began on 10/17/23 with a last covered day of 11/5/23. A CMS 10123 - NOMNC form dated 11/5/23 documented Resident #278 was notified that their last covered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-05 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview conducted during the Recertification Survey from 11/27/23 to 12/05/23, the facility did not ensure that the resident or the resident's representative was given a timely written notice of the facility's bed hold policy upon transfer to the hospital for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalization. Specifically, there was no documented evidence that Residents #144 and #125 and/or their representatives were given a timely written notice of the facility's bed hold policy upon transfer to the hospital. Findings include: The Bed Hold policy dated 12/22 documented the facility would provide to residents and/or their representatives written information regarding the bed hold and return policy of the facility on admission and prior to /at the time of hospitalizations and therapeutic leaves. 1) Resident #144 was admitted with diagnoses including major depressive disorder, esophageal stricture and gastro esophageal reflux. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS; a resident assessment and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey from 11/27/23 to 12/5/23, the facility did not ensure each resident had a person-centered comprehensive care plan implemented to addresses the resident's medical and physical needs for 1 (Resident #60) of 4 residents reviewed for care plan implementation. Specifically, for Resident #60 the facility did not implement proper footwear as planned. Findings include: Resident # 60 was admitted with diagnoses including Dementia, Peripheral Vascular disease, and schizoaffective disorder. The 11/2/23 Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented the resident was moderately cognitively impaired and required set up to partial assistance for all activities of daily living (ADLs). The comprehensive care plan (CCP), updated 11/26/23, documented the resident was care planned at risk for falls, had peripheral vascular disease and needed assistance with ADLs. Interventions included wearing appropriate footwear for movement and to provide constant safety reminders for the risk of falling; to educate the resident on the importance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey from 11/27/23 to 12/5/23, the facility did not ensure they reviewed and revised the comprehensive care plan with measurable objectives, time frames and appropriate interventions for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #11) reviewed for communication. Specifically, Resident #11 communication care plan did not reflect their current communication status. Findings include: The facility comprehensive care plan policy that was last revised 2/2023, Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' conditions change. Resident #11 was admitted with diagnoses which included dysarthria (difficulty speaking), hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebrovascular disease (stroke) affecting the right dominant side. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool) dated 8/25/23 documented the resident's cognition was intact; the resident had unclear speech but was usually…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification and Abbreviated surveys (NY00314899 and NY311919) from 11/27/23 to 12/5/23, the facility did not ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 4 of 4 residents (Resident #578, reviewed for quality of care. Specifically, 1) Resident #578 refused medications and treatments, and the facility did not inform the health care provider or document in the resident's electronic medical record (EMR); 2) Resident #87's behavior (spitting) was not evaluated to determine if it was contributing to weight loss. 3) Resident #125 was not provided seizure medications as ordered for a total of 34 omissions in March 2023. 4) Resident #329 did not receive Dilaudid as ordered by the medical provider on 5/28/2023 and 5/30/2023 and the medical provider was not notified. Findings include: Policy and Procedure dated 12/20/2019 titled, 'Medication Administration' documented that if a drug is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews during the Recertification Survey from 11/27/23 to 12/5/23, the facility did not ensure that Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) performance reviews were completed at least once every 12 months. Specifically, performance evaluations were not conducted every 12 months for four of five (CNA #11, #10, #2, and #9) records reviewed. The findings are: There was no documented evidence to indicate that CNA #2, #9, #10, and #11 had performance reviews completed at least once every 12 months. The facility provided documentation that CNA #11 was hired 2/24/88, CNA #10 was hired 11/12/12, CNA #2 was hired 10/20/20, and CNA #9 was hired 7/22/21 During an interview on 12/5/23 at 12:27 PM CNA #9 stated about five years ago the facility stopped conducting performance evaluations. During an interview on12/4/23 at 03:56 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated that the facility did not conduct CNA annual performance evaluations, but they do conduct competencies with their CNAS. During an interview on 12/5/23 at 12:14 PM, the Administrator stated that the facility does…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview conducted during a Recertification Survey from 11/27/23 to 12/5/23, the facility did not ensure that all drugs and biologicals used were stored in accordance with professional standards for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for Medication Storage. Specifically, 1. Resident #78 was observed with medications unsecured and unsupervised, on their bedside table and 2. Resident #174 was observed unsupervised, with medications on their meal tray. Findings include: The Policy and Procedure, 'Medication -Storage' revised 1/2023 documented medications will be stored in a manner that maintains the integrity of the product, ensures safety of the residents, and is in accordance with Department of Health guidelines. The findings are: 1. Resident # 78 was admitted with diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disorder (COPD), Obstructive Sleep Apnea, and Hypertension. The Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool) quarterly assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview during the Recertification Survey from 11/29/23 to 12/5/23, the facility did not ensure that staff maintained an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, 1. A Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 was observed not using Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) or washing their hands appropriately while assisting Resident (# 59) who was on contact precautions. 2. A CNA did not use a barrier when assisting Resident # 131 with eating a sandwich. The findings are: 1. Resident # 59 had diagnosis which included sepsis, atrial fibrillation, and Clostridium Difficile (C- Diff). The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool) date 11/16/23 Resident # 59 had severe cognitive impairment. The Physician order dated 11/22/23 documented Resident # 59 was on contact precautions for C-Diff. During an observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-09-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations record reviews and interviews during the Recertification Survey it was determined that the facility did not ensure that based on the comprehensive assessment a resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan. Specifically, the clinical staff did not provide post operative assessment, care planning and treatment for Resident #72, who returned to the facility after multiple surgeries. (5) Resident #72 is a [AGE] year-old male with admitting diagnoses of schizophrenia, end stage renal disease status post AV graft formation (a surgical procedure to form an access for hemodialysis) and left kidney removal, hypertension, and diabetes. The MDS 9/4/20 indicated the resident is cognitively intact and requires extensive/1-person assist with bed mobility, toileting and dressing. The resident ambulates with a walker. The resident returned from acute care facility on 8/29/20 after having the following surgeries: 1)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-09-24 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that appropriate care and services were provided according to professional standards to promote the practicable wellbeing for 4 of 4 residents ((1) #93, (2) #162, (3) #59, (4) #159 reviewed for positioning and mobility. Specifically, residents #59, #93, #159 and #162 were observed with clenched fist without hand rolls or splints in place to prevent contractures. The findings are: (1) Resident #93 is a [AGE] year-old admitted from the hospital on [DATE] with diagnoses of Hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus and Functional Quadriplegia. The Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] documented short term and long-term memory problems. The resident required two-person total dependence for bed mobility, transfer, dressing toilet use and personal hygiene. There was no documented rehab and restorative services. The resident was observed on 09/17/20 at 02:28 PM with limited range of motion and contractures of the upper…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-09-24 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure the right to participate in the development and implementation of person-centered plans of care, including but not limited to the right to participate in the planning process and attend care planning meetings. This was evident for 2 of 2 residents (Residents #113 and #55) reviewed for care planning. Specifically, resident # 113 has not participated in the planning process and has not participated in a care planning meeting, and resident #55 also has not participated in a care plan meeting. The findings are: Review of the Clinical Operations policy and procedure for comprehensive, person-centered care plans dated 10/2015 and revised 10/2019 documented that each resident's care plan will be consistent with the resident's rights to participate in the development and implementation of his or her care plan, including the right to participate in the planning process. Resident #113 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-09-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY [NAME], [NAME] A. (41666) Based on interview and record review conducted during the most recent recertification survey, the facility did not report to the New York State Department of Health (NYS DOH) an unwitnessed fall incident that resulted in a major injury to resident (#158). This was evident for 1 out of 1 resident reviewed for accidents. The findings are: Resident #158 is a [AGE] year-old resident who was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of Hypertension, Schizophrenia Hypothyroidism, and dementia on 10/06/2016. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 07/13/2019 documented a BIMS Score of 7 indicating severe cognitive impairment. The resident did not have a fall history, was ambulatory and required supervision for bed mobility, transfer and eating. A Potential for Fall Care Plan initiated on 10/07/2016 documented a goal that the resident will be free of accidents / injury with the following interventions: bed in lowest position, ensure proper footwear and encourage resident to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-09-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review during a recertification survey the facility did not ensure that the facility developed and implement a resident centered care plan with measurable objectives for residents in need of positioning devices. Specifically, (1) resident #93 and (2) resident #162 were observed during the initial screening process with bilateral hand contractures with no devices in place. The findings are: (1) Resident #93 is a [AGE] year-old admitted from the hospital on [DATE] with diagnoses of Hypertension (HTN), Diabetes Mellitus and Functional Quadriplegia. The Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] documented short term and long-term memory problem. The resident required two-person total dependence for bed mobility, transfer, dressing toilet use and personal hygiene. There were no documented services provided in Section O (no rehab and no restorative services). The resident was observed on 09/17/20 at 02:28 PM with limited range of motion and contractures of the upper extremities with no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-09-24 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review conducted during a Recertification and Abbreviated survey (Complaint # NY00249941) the facility did not ensure that physician's orders and resident's advance directives were reviewed prior to initiating CPR (Cardio Pulimonary Resuscitation). Specifically, the ADN (Assistant Director of Nursing) initiated CPR on Resident #1 who had a MOLST (Medical Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment) form and Physician's Orders that identified the resident's choice for DNR (Do Not Resuscitated). This was evident for 1 out 3 residents reviewed for advance directives. The findings are: The Facility Policy on Emergency Procedure on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation dated 12/2017 documented that if a resident is found unresponsive and not breathing normally, a licensed staff member who is certified in CPR shall initiate CPR unless it is known and verified that a DNR order exist. A Facility Policy on Advance Directives and MOLST NY dated 03/2019 documented that all residents have the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2020-09-24 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — isolated
    Hire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review during a recertification survey, the facility failed to employ a qualified social worker on a full time basis. Specifically, this facility has a licensed bed capacity of 200. From 04/15/20-08/24/20 it operated without a qualified full time Social Worker (SW) in its employ. The findings are: The Facility Survey Report (FSR) dated 09/16/20 under the heading Social Worker indicates that the facility should have a full-time SW with a master's degree qualification. Review of SW #1's Employee Profile and Time Sheet from 01/18/20 to 08/16/20 revealed a bachelor's degree and documentation of part time employment in the facility. SW#1 resigned effective 09/08/20 documenting resignation from her position as a part time SW in the facility. There was no documented evidence that SW#1 became a full-time employee from 04/15/20 to 09/08/20. Review of SW #2's Employee Profile and Time Sheet from 01/18/2019 to 04/03/20 revealed a master's degree and documentation of full-time employment in the facility. SW#2 resigned effective 04/03/20. Review of SW…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CENTERS HEALTH CARE — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.1-0.1 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 52.1+1.9 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.8-0.8 vs chain
The other 35 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Buffalo Center For Rehabilitation And NursingBuffalo, NY 1 of 5Carthage Center For Rehabilitation And NursingCarthage, NY 1 of 5Delmar Center For Rehabilitation And NursingDelmar, NY 1 of 5Ellicott Center For Rehabilitation And NursingBuffalo, NY 1 of 5Granville Center For Rehabilitation And NursingGranville, NY 1 of 5Hammonton Center for Rehabilitation and HealthcareHammonton, NJ 1 of 5Hope Center for HIV and Nursing CareBronx, NY 1 of 5Oneida Center For Rehabilitation And NursingUtica, NY 1 of 5Onondaga Center for Rehabilitation and NursingMinoa, NY 1 of 5Ontario Center for Rehabilitation and HealthcareCanandaigua, NY 1 of 5Rochester Center for Rehabilitation and NursingRochester, NY 2 of 5Boro Park Center for Rehabilitation and HealthcareBrooklyn, NY 2 of 5Brooklyn Center for Rehabilitation and ResidentialBrooklyn, NY 2 of 5Deptford Center for Rehabilitation and HealthcareDeptford, NJ 2 of 5Fulton Center For Rehabilitation And HealthcareGloversville, NY 2 of 5Holliswood Center for Rehabilitation and HealthcarHollis, NY 2 of 5New Paltz Center For Rehabilitation And NursingNew Paltz, NY 2 of 5Richmond Center for Rehabilitation and Specialty HStaten Island, NY 2 of 5Schenectady Center For Rehabilitation And NursingSchenectady, NY 2 of 5Triboro Center for Rehabilitation and NursingBronx, NY 2 of 5Troy Center For Rehabilitation And NursingTroy, NY 2 of 5Warren Center For Rehabilitation And NursingQueensbury, NY 3 of 5Beth Abraham Center for Rehabilitation and NursingBronx, NY 3 of 5Bronx Center For Rehabilitation & Health CareBronx, NY 3 of 5Bushwick Center for Rehabilitation and Health CareBrooklyn, NY 3 of 5Cooperstown Center For Rehabilitation And NursingCooperstown, NY 3 of 5Essex Center For Rehabilitation And HealthcareElizabethtown, NY 3 of 5Glens Falls Center For Rehabilitation And NursingGlens Falls, NY 3 of 5Steuben Center for Rehabilitation and HealthcareBath, NY 3 of 5Washington Center For Rehab And HealthcareArgyle, NY 4 of 5Corning Center for Rehabilitation and HealthcareCorning, NY 4 of 5Far Rockaway Center for Rehabilitation and NursingFar Rockaway, NY 4 of 5University Center for Rehabilitation and NursingBronx, NY 4 of 5Williamsbridge Center For Rehabilitation And NrsgBronx, NY 5 of 5Slate Valley Center For Rehabilitation And NursingGranville, NY

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
LIGHT OPERATIONAL HOLDINGS ASSOCIATES LLOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST98%since 03/15/2017
HOCH, MICHAELIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 03/15/2017

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$26.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-18.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$4.1M
Related-party expense13% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 66%Medicare 8%Other / private 26%

This home reported $4.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$466per resident / day
operating cost
$14,173per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$395per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New York Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New York
$15,528/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$16,729/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,110/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 335424. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next