No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Troy Center For Rehabilitation And Nursing

49 Marvin Avenue, Troy, NY 12180 · For profit - Corporation · 78 certified beds · (518) 273-6646 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseResident-funds citation (F0565)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2026
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (64%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
79 Vandenburgh Ave · (518) 271-0063 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
MARKET320.3 mi
79 Vandenburgh Ave · (518) 266-8711 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Market 320.3 mi
79 Vandenburgh Ave · (518) 266-8711 · Call to confirm hours
Park
55 Maxwell Dr · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
35 Morrison Ave · (518) 250-6989

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.8%14.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.1%5.8%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%1.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms13.4%19.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.3%3.1%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened7.8%12.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication9.5%13.2%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine86.4%95.3%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.2%6.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control15.6%19.5%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table6.6%13.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine82.4%78.8%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.7%20.6%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.2%9.6%12.0%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

40.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 72 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

40.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
56.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.32U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.18hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 56.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 41 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 52% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF40.3%CMS range 30.8–49.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.6%CMS range 7.1–15.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge56.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge56.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge61.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified94.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge96.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.8%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.3%CMS range 4.8–15.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.131.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.49
RN hours/ resident / day
1.03
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.20
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.72
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.38
RN hoursweekends
63.9%
Total nursing turnover
54.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 78 beds and averages 76.6 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 1 bed typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.72 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.20 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.24 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.92 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.53 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 64% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-02-12)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2021-10-28)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

38 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2026-04-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during survey, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to be free from neglect for one (1) (Resident #1) of three (3) residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident #1 had a pressure ulcer on the heel of their right foot known to the facility on [DATE]. There was no documented evidence the facility completed wound assessments or management from a qualified wound care provider after 09/19/2025. The designated in-house wound care provider completed rounds on days when the resident was scheduled to be out of the facility for dialysis and no alternate arrangements were made. On 10/06/2025, Resident #1 reported increased right foot pain and was transferred to the hospital from the dialysis center on 10/10/2025. The resident was diagnosed with sepsis (life-threatening reaction to an infection), a right pathological calcaneal fracture with acute osteomyelitis (heel fracture that often arises from a bone infection), and bacteremia (bacteria in the blood). Treatment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during a survey, the facility failed to ensure a resident with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing and prevent infection for three (3) (Resident #s 1, 6, and 7) of three (3) residents reviewed. Specifically, the facility failed to provide daily care/treatment of a pressure ulcer in accordance with professional standards of practice and care planned interventions for (a.) Resident #1's unstageable pressure ulcer on the right heel, (b.) Resident #6's stage 3 pressure ulcer on the sacrum, and (c.) Resident #7's stage 3 pressure ulcer on the sacrum, that were present upon admission. Findings include:Cross-referenced to F600: Free from Abuse and Neglect Cross-referenced to F656: Develop/Implement Comprehensive Care Plan Cross-referenced to F657: Care Plan Timing and Revision Policy and Procedure titled, Wound Identification and Wound Rounds, revised 11/06/2023, documented the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews conducted during a survey, the facility failed to ensure residents were afforded the right to formulate advanced directives including having a physician order related to their code status (level of medical interventions a person wishes to have started if their breathing stopped such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation or do not resuscitate), and establishing mechanisms for documentation and communicating the residents' choices to staff responsible for their care for one (1) (Resident #1) of three (3) residents reviewed. Specifically, when the resident no longer wanted cardiopulmonary resuscitation on [DATE], there was no physician order for the change in code status and advance directive until [DATE]. Findings include: Resident #1: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of end stage renal disease (kidneys no longer work to meet the body's needs) with dependence on renal dialysis (a treatment that filters waste and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review conducted during a Survey, the facility failed to report the results of all investigations to his or her designated representative and to other officials in accordance with State law, including to the State Survey Agency, within five (5) working days of the incident, and if the alleged violation is verified appropriate corrective action was taken for one (1) of one (1) residents reviewed. Specifically on 10/14/2025, Resident #3 threw objects including a chair that resulted in the chair hitting Resident #5's right foot. Resident #3 also climbed on top of Resident #4's bed while Resident #4 was laying in their bed. There was no documented evidence this incident involving Resident #3 was reported to the State Survey Agency as required. Findings include: Facility policy titled, Abuse Policy, reviewed 07/18/2025, documented the facility prohibited the mistreatment, neglect, and abuse of residents/patients and misappropriation of resident/patient property by anyone, including staff, family, friends, or other residents. The Administrator…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews conducted during a survey, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were developed and implemented for residents according to professional standards for one (1) (Resident #6) of three (3) residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident #6's comprehensive care plan did not contain measurable goals and interventions for the care and treatment of the stage three (3) pressure ulcer on the sacrum (triangular bone at the base of the spine). Findings include: Cross-referenced to F686: Treatment/Services to Prevent/Heal Pressure Ulcers Resident #6: Resident #6 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of orthopedic surgery of right tibia/fibula (bones in lower leg) aftercare, diabetes, and chronic kidney disease stage 3A (where kidney function is between 45-59 percent). The Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 02/28/2026, documented the resident was cognitively intact. The resident was able to make themselves understood and understood others. The Policy and Procedure titled, Care - Plans Comprehensive, revised 10/2019, documented a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews conducted during a survey, the facility failed to ensure that comprehensive care plans were revised and updated according to professional standards for one (1) (Resident # 1) of three (3) residents reviewed. Specifically, for Resident #1, the comprehensive care plan was not updated (a.) to reflect weekly wound assessments were not done by the wound care provider when the resident was out for dialysis treatment on 09/25/2025, 10/02/2025, and 10/09/2025, and (b.) when there was a significant change in the pressure ulcer on 10/02/2025 and had deteriorated. Findings include: Cross-referenced to F686: Treatment/Services to Prevent/Heal Pressure UlcersResident #1: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of end stage renal disease (kidneys no longer work to meet the body's needs) with dependence on renal dialysis (a treatment that filters waste and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys are failing), diabetes (body cannot use insulin correctly and sugar builds up in the blood) with diabetic chronic kidney disease, and chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0659 — isolated
    Provide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during a survey, the facility failed to ensure services provided or arranged by the facility as outlined by the comprehensive care plan were provided by qualified persons in accordance with each resident's written plan of care for one (1) (Resident #1) of three (3) residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident #1's unstageable pressure ulcer on the right heel was assessed on 9/25/2025 by a Licensed Practical Nurse who was not qualified to do so within their scope of practice. Findings include: Resident #1: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of end stage renal disease (kidneys no longer work to meet the body's needs) with dependence on renal dialysis (a treatment that filters waste and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys are failing), diabetes (body cannot use insulin correctly and sugar builds up in the blood) with diabetic chronic kidney disease, and chronic peripheral venous insufficiency (occurs when leg veins become damaged and do not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0711 — isolated
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews conducted during a survey, the facility failed to ensure the physician reviewed the resident's total program of care, including medications and treatments at each visit for one (1) (Resident #1) of three (3) residents reviewed. Specifically, the Attending Physician saw Resident #1 on 09/24/2025 for admission evaluation and their progress note did not include a plan for care and treatment of an unstageable pressure ulcer on the right heel. Findings include: Cross-referenced to F600: Free from Abuse and NeglectResident #1: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of end stage renal disease (when the kidneys no longer work to meet the body's needs) with dependence on renal dialysis (a treatment that filters waste and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys are failing), diabetes (body cannot use insulin correctly and sugar builds up in the blood) with diabetic chronic kidney disease, and chronic peripheral venous insufficiency (occurs when leg veins become damaged and do not allow blood flow back to your heart). The Minimum Data…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review during the recertification survey from 2/05/2024 to 2/12/2024, the facility did not ensure treatment with respect, dignity, and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of their quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality. Specifically, residents were observed to wear hospital gowns instead of personalized clothing; and staff entered resident rooms without knocking or conducting themselves in a way of dignified care and respect to the residents on 2 of 2 units. This is evidenced by: A facility policy titled Resident Rights dated 2/2020, documented residents had a right to a dignified existence; to be treated with respect, kindness and dignity; to have self-determination, and be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of property and exploitation. A facility policy titled Personal Property, last revised 8/2019 documented that the residents were permitted to retain and use personal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-12 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 2/05/2024 to 2/12/2024, the facility did not ensure the Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) was an accurate assessment reflective of each resident status at the time of assessment. Specifically, the discharge tracking Minimum Data Set was not accurately completed for 5 of 74 residents reviewed for accuracy related to proper discharge placement. This is evidenced by: During a review of records on 2/07/2024 for Resident #73 discharge for hospitalization, the resident was discharged to home and not to the hospital. The Medication Administration Record Section A documented that Resident #73 was discharged to a short-term general hospital. The nursing progress notes dated 11/10/2023 documented that Resident #73 was discharged to their family member's home with all belongings. In a review of records for discharge from 11/1/2023 to 2/7/2024, five additional resident discharges were inaccurately documented and did not correctly reflect the resident's discharge status at the time of assessment. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-12 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review conducted during a Recertification survey from 2/05/2024 to 2/12/2024, the facility did not ensure that residents receive proper treatment and assistive device to maintain hearing abilities. Specifically, Resident #32 did not receive assistance with applying and removing bilateral hearing aids, and did not receive follow up Otolaryngology (a medical specialty which is focused on the ears, nose, and throat) visits for maintenance of hearing aids as recommended. This was evident for 1 of 27 residents reviewed for Communication/Sensory. This is evidenced by: Resident #32 Resident #32 had diagnoses including osteoarthritis (degeneration of joint cartilage and the underlying bone. It causes pain and stiffness, especially in the hip, knee, and thumb joints), difficulty walking, peripheral vascular disease (a circulatory condition in which narrowed blood vessels reduce blood flow to the limbs), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), diabetes mellitus, major depression and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 27 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews during a recertification and abbreviated survey (Case # NY00312707) from 2/05/2024 to 2/12/2024, the facility did not ensure the residents were free from significant medication errors for 1 (Resident #327) of 1 resident reviewed for medication reduction. Specifically, for Resident #327, medication reduction was not properly transcribed and administered as ordered in a timely manner. This is evidenced by: Resident #327 Resident #327 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses of metabolic encephalopathy (a series of neurological disorders not caused by primary structural abnormalities), severe sepsis with septic shock (a condition in which the body responds improperly to an infection including possible organ failure), and cirrhosis of the liver (a condition where scar tissue gradually replaces liver tissue); and was discharged from the facility prior to this survey. The Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 2/27/2023 documented the resident could understand and be understood by others and was cognitively intact. A document titled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-12 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during a recertification and abbreviated survey (Case # NY00327311 and NY00315143) from 2/05/2024 to 2/12/2024, the facility did not ensure sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for all residents in the facility. Specifically, there was not sufficient staff to meet resident needs in activities of daily living; multiple residents stated there were long waits for call lights showers were not given, not gotten out of bed and dressed until late morning, long waits to return to bed, and not enough staff to provide care. This is evidenced by: The facility's staffing policy revised on 11/2023, documented staffing numbers and skills requirements of direct care staff were determined by the needs of the resident's care plan. The number of nursing staff on duty would be sufficient to ensure nursing care needs of each resident were met. The facility's Call Light…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-12 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey from 2/05/2024 to 2/12/2024, the facility did not adequately provide for residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area on one (1) of 2 units. Specifically, the facility nurse call system did not function in resident room #s 5, 7, and 11 on the North Unit. This is evidenced by: During observations on 2/08/2024 at 9:33 AM, the call bell did not activate when tested in resident room # 5 for beds A and B. Additionally, room [ROOM NUMBER] was utilizing tap bells and did not have nurse cords to activate the nurse call system. room [ROOM NUMBER] was utilizing a tap bell and did not have a nurse call cord to activate the nurse call system. During an interview on 2/08/2024 at 9:37 AM, Resident #8 stated that they would press the nurse call cord if one were provided. Record review of [NAME] Center Repair Requisitions, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during recertification and abbreviated survey (Case #NY00322407) from 2/05/2024 to 2/12/2024, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source, were immediately reported to the State Agency for 1 (Resident #51) of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. Specifically, the facility did not report the allegations of abuse involving Resident #51 to the New York State Department of Health after becoming aware of the allegations on 8/09/2023 at 7:20 AM. This is evidenced by: Resident #51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Atherosclerosis with unspecified peripheral vascular disease, type II Diabetes, and vascular Dementia with other behavioral disturbances. The Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 12/10/2021 documented that the resident usually could be understood and understood others, and that the resident had severely impaired cognition for daily living decisions. The facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 2/05/2024 to 2/12/2024, the facility did not ensure the development of comprehensive person-centered care plans - that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet the resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs - as identified in the comprehensive assessment for 2 (Resident #s 14 and 327) of 27 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. Specifically, (1) for Resident #327, the facility did not ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed to address the use of indwelling urinary catheter; and (2) for Resident #14, the facility did not ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed to address the resident's dental care. This is evidenced by: The Policy and Procedure titled Care Plans - Comprehensive, dated 10/2019, documented the facility would develop a comprehensive, resident centered care plan for each resident based on the individual needs/problems of each resident.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews during a recertification survey from 2/05/2024 to 2/12/2024, the facility did not ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for 3 (Resident #s 2, 32 and 327) of 27 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living. Specifically, (A) Resident #'s 2 and 32 were not provided assistance with personal hygiene during morning care; (B) Resident #32 did not have a clean change of clothing and Resident # 2 was not provided sufficient extra-large incontinence briefs; (C) Resident #327 was not provided their weekly shower. This is evidenced by: The facility policy Activities of Daily Living Support effective 08/2016 and revised on 10/2019 documented residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living independently would receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. Resident #2 The resident was admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00294027), the facility did not ensure that each resident received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for 1 (Resident #4) of 4 residents reviewed. Specifically, for Resident #4 who was care planned for floor mats next to bed when in bed, floor mats were not placed when the resident fell from the bed, resulting in a fall with fractures of the 8th and 9th right ribs. This was evidenced by: The facility policy Falls Management and Prevention, revised 01/2021, documented the facility provided an environment that was free from accident hazards over which the facility had control and provided supervision and assistive devices to each resident to prevent avoidable accidents. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including dementia, general muscle weakness, and compression fractures of the lumbar spine (when the bones of your spine collapse). The Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) documented the resident had severely impaired cognition. The at risk for falls…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-10-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure each resident was treated with respect and dignity and each resident was cared for in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of their quality of life for 2 (North Unit and South Unit) of 2 units and 2 (Resident #s 50 and 32) of 4 residents reviewed for dignity. Specifically, in a Resident Council Meeting held on 10/22/2021, residents stated incontinence care was not provided timely, call bells were not answered timely, and staff were rude and lacked compassion. For Resident #50, staff used inappropriate language in their presence, and staff turned off their call bell without addressing their needs. For Resident #32, staff did not answer the call bell timely, and staff used inappropriate language in a demeaning manner after the resident had diarrhea and needed to be cleaned. This is evidenced by: A Resident Council Meeting was held on 10/22/2021 at 10:40 AM. There were 6…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-10-28 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews conducted during the Recertification Survey, the facility did not ensure the views of a resident group were promptly acted upon and the recommendations of such groups that concerned issues of resident care and life in the facility. Specifically, the facility did not ensure concerns voiced during Resident Council Meetings were promptly acted upon and did not ensure the Resident Council was provided with facility responses, actions, and rationale regarding their concerns. This is evidenced by: A review of Resident Council Minutes documented: -7/19/2021- documented a concern related to wandering residents and a question asking when podiatry would be coming. The minutes documented a resolution was returned by the department responsible for addressing the concerns, however the column on the Resident Council Minutes to document if the resident had been notified of the response was blank. -8/16/2021- documented concerns related to medication being left at bedside, a housekeeper not properly cleaning and a question asking if less residents can be in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-10-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview during the recertification survey, the facility did not provide effective housekeeping and maintenance services. Specifically, door frames and baseboards were not clean and in good repair on 2 of 2 resident units. This is evidenced as follows. A selection of rooms were inspected on 10/26/2021 at 9:15 AM revealing that the paint on the door frames of resident rooms 1, 3, 6, 11, 12, 13, 17, 23, 24, 26, 31, 34, 37, 39, and 41 were heavily chipped, and the baseboards in resident rooms 6, 18, 36, and 37 were covered in a brownish debris. During an interview on 10/25/2021 at 1:00 PM, the Director of Maintenance and the Environmental Services Manager stated the facility would repaint the door frames and clean the baseboards in the resident rooms. During an interview on 10/27/2021 at 9:30 AM, the Administrator stated the facility would be audited, and all the chipped door frames would be repainted, and the baseboards repaired and cleaned. 10 NYCRR 483.10(i)(2)

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-10-28 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview during a recertification survey and abbreviated survey (Case #NY00279792) the facility did not ensure baseline care plans were developed within 48 hours of a resident's admission and provided to the resident and their representative with a summary of the baseline care plan for 4 (Resident #s 22, 25, 67 and 175) of 17 residents reviewed. Specifically, for Resident #32, the facility did not ensure a baseline care plan was completed, for Resident #175, the facility did not ensure that the baseline care plan was fully completed and did not ensure the resident or representative were provided with the baseline care plan. For Resident #25 and #67, the facility did not ensure the baseline care plan was reviewed with, and a copy provided to, the resident and/or their representative. This is evidenced by: The Policy & Procedure titled Care Plans-Baseline and dated 1/2020 documented, a baseline plan of care to meet the residents immediate needs shall be developed for each…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-10-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview during the recertification and abbreviated survey (Case #s NY00283415 and NY00285016) the facility did not ensure comprehensive care plans (CCP) were developed and implemented for each resident consistent with the resident rights and that included measurable objectives and timeframe's to meet a resident's medical, nursing and mental and psychosocial needs for 8 (Resident #'s 14, 17, 27, 30, 32, 67, 74, and 225) of 33 residents reviewed for Comprehensive Care Plans (CCPs). Specifically, for Resident #14, the facility did not ensure the CCP for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) addressed the resident's ambulation status; for Resident #17, did not ensure a care plan was developed to address the resident's bowel and bladder incontinence; for Resident #27 did not ensure a CCP was developed to address the diagnosis of anxiety; for Resident #30, did not ensure care plans were developed to address the resident's anxiety and depression, the use of anticoagulant medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-10-28 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure a policy was developed for the Monthly Medication Regimen Review (MRR) that included timeframe's for the different steps in the process. Specifically, the facility did not ensure there were timeframe's established and documented in the policy for steps in the MRR process concerning actions the physician needed to take when an irregularity was identified. This is evidenced by: The Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled Medication Regimen Review (MRR) dated 3/2020, documented the goal of the MRR is to promote positive outcomes while minimizing adverse consequences and potential risks associated with medication. If the identified irregularity represents a risk to a person ' s life, health, or safety, the Consultant Pharmacist contacts the physician immediately (within two hours) to report the information to the physician verbally, and documents the notification. If the Physician does not provide a timely or adequate response, or the Consultant Pharmacist identifies that no action has been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-10-28 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interviews during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that it's medication error rate did not exceed 5% of greater for 3 (Resident #s 13, 29 and 62) of 4 residents reviewed for medication errors. Specifically, during an observed medication pass the facility did not adhere to provider orders during 8 of 26 total opportunities, resulting in a final medication error rate of 30.77%. This was evidenced by: The facility policy titled Medication Administration last revised 12/2019 documented medications must be administered in accordance with the orders, including any required timeframe. Vital signs, if necessary, must be checked/verified for each resident prior to administering medications. Medications must be administered within one hour of their prescribed time, unless otherwise specified. The individual administering the medication was to record in the resident's medical record the date and time the medication the medication was administered, and the dosage of the medication administered. Resident #13: During an observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-10-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews during the recertification survey and abbreviated survey (Case #s NY00279792 and NY00280289), the facility did not maintain medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that were accurately documented and complete for 4 (Resident #'s 17, 67, 175 and #177) of 19 residents reviewed. Specifically, for Resident #17, the facility did not ensure Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) documentation for Bladder/Bowel incontinence was complete, for Resident #67, the facility did not ensure documentation in the resident record accurately reflected the provision of wound care or when oxygen was administered, for Resident #67, the facility did not ensure daily CNA documentation of Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care was complete and accurate. Additionally, for Resident #'s 175 and 177, the facility did not ensure that the resident's records documented when oxygen was administered. Resident #17: Resident #17 was admitted to the facility with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-10-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that residents in need of respiratory care, received such care consistent with professional standards for 1 (Resident #67) of 1 resident reviewed. Specifically, for Resident #67, the facility did not ensure a physician's order for the prescribed flow rate for oxygen administration was followed. This is evidenced by: Resident #67: The resident was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF), atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease. The Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) dated 9/14/2021, documented the resident was cognitively intact, could understand others and could make self understood. A physician's (MD) order dated 10/21/2021, documented the resident was to receive oxygen as needed via nasal cannula to be administered at two liters per minute to keep oxygen saturations at or above ninety percent. During observations Resident #67 received Oxygen via nasal cannula: 10/22/2021 at 8:31 AM at three liters per minute;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-10-28 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure laboratory services were obtained or provided timely to meet resident needs for 1 (Resident #17) of 3 residents reviewed for laboratory services. Specifically, for Resident #17, the facility did not ensure a physician ordered urinalysis (UA- a test of the urine used to detect and manage a wide range of disorders, such as urinary tract infections) and Culture and Sensitivity (CS- a laboratory test to detect and identify bacteria and yeast in the urine, which may be causing a urinary tract infection) dated 9/19/2021 was obtained. This was evidenced by: Resident #17: Resident #17 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses of seizures, stroke, and hydrocephalus. The Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) dated 7/30/2021 documented the resident had moderately impaired cognition, could understand others and could make themself understood. The facility's Policy and Procedure for Physician Orders was requested on 10/25/2021 and was not provided to the New York State Department of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-02-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews during the recertification survey the facility did not develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 9 (Resident #'s 12, 23, 52, 54, 58, 59, 63, 66, and #67) of 18 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans (CCPs). Specifically, for Resident #12, the facility did not ensure that the CCP for Psychotropic Medications and Behaviors included person centered interventions; for Resident #23, the CCP for Cognitive Loss and Mood did not include resident centered interventions; for Resident #52, the facility did not ensure the CCP for Psychotropic Medication Use addressed the use of an antidepressant medication (Trazodone), the CCP for Alteration in Psychosocial Well-Being included goals or interventions and did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-02-12 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record review during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure provision of sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident throughout the facility. Specifically, the facility did not ensure that the minimum staffing levels for Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) was met on 14 out of 14 calendar days from 1/25/20 to 2/7/20; that each resident received care for their incontinence during the night shift and specifically, for Resident #4, that the resident received incontinence care from 7:00 PM on 2/5/20 to 10:30 AM on 2/6/20; Additionally, the facility did not ensure meals were served timely in 4 out of 4 designated dining areas on 2/6/20 and 2/10/20; and that care and services provided by the Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) was documented daily. This was evidenced by: Finding #1: The facility did not ensure that the minimum staffing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-02-12 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that each resident received, and the facility provided food that accommodated resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, and appealing options of similar nutritive value to residents who choose not to eat food that was initially served or who requested a different meal choice for 2 (Resident #54 and #227) of 3 resident's reviewed for nutrition. Specifically, for Resident #54, the facility did not ensure the resident's food preferences were printed on the resident's meal ticket and did not ensure the resident was offered an option of similar nutritive value when he/she declined the main meal provided; for Resident # 227, the resident's food preferences provided at meals were not consistent with the resident's printed meal tickets. This is evidenced by: The Policy and Procedure titled Honoring Preferences, Making Substitutions, last revised 1/2019, documented food preferences were obtained as part of the admission process by the Director of Food and Nutrition or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-02-12 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that there were no more than 14 hours between a substantial evening meal and breakfast the following day, except, when a nourishing snack was served at bedtime, up to 16 hours may elapse between a substantial evening meal and breakfast the following day if a resident group agrees to this meal span. Specifically, the facility did not ensure a nourishing bedtime snack was provided when there was a greater than 14-hour time span between the evening meal and breakfast. This was evidenced by: The Policy and Procedure titled Nourishments- Supplements- Snacks, last revised 3/2019, documented residents may request a snack at any time, however nursing personnel would offer at least a bedtime snack to residents. A review of the document titled, Meal Service Times and Location dated 1/2020, documented the meal times were approximate to when the trays/meals would arrive in the designated dining areas: Breakfast: Cart 1: 8:00 AM Liberty Cafe Cart 2: 8:10 AM Activities Room Cart 3:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-02-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview during the recertification survey the facility did not store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Food packages shall be in good condition and shall protect the integrity of the contents so food is not exposed to adulteration or potential contaminants, paper towels must be supplied at handwashing stations, and non-food surfaces are to be kept clean. Specifically, cans of food were dented, paper towels were missing from the handwashing station, and the shelves and walls in the walk-in cooler were not clean. This is evidenced as follows. The main kitchen was inspected on 02/06/2020 at 8:45 AM. One can of sweet potatoes and one can of cranberry sauce found in the common stock had dents on the hermetic seals. The kitchen handwashing station was missing paper towels, and the storage racks and walls in the walk-in cooler were covered with a moldlike substance not clean. The Food Service Director in an interview on 02/06/2020 at 9:15 AM, stated that he will remove the dented cans in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-02-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews during a recertification survey the facility did not ensure Medical Records were maintained in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that were complete, accurately documented, readily accessible and systematically organized for 6 (Resident #'s 4, 7, 23, 54, 66, and #227) of 18 residents reviewed. Specifically, for Resident #'s 4 & 23 the facility did not ensure daily Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) documentation of Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) care; for Resident #7, who received dialysis, the facility did not ensure the resident's fistula (a connection located under the skin and used during dialysis to access the bloodstream) site was monitored daily per the physician's order for signs and symptoms of infection/inflammation/bleeding and for the presence of bruits/thrills; for Resident #54, the facility did not ensure the resident's percentage of food consumed was documented daily; for Resident #66, the resident's ADLs including bathing,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-02-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview during the recertification survey, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, for one (Resident #63) of one resident reviewed for a dressing change, the facility did not ensure gloves were changed when contaminated, handwashing was performed between glove changes and supplies were not removed from the resident's room during a dressing change to an unstageable pressure ulcer of the right heel; the facility did not ensure face masks were properly worn by two employees while in resident areas. Additionally, for one (Resident #1) of six residents reviewed for medication administration, the facility did not ensure the resident was not provided with medications staff had handled with bare hands and for one (Resident #57) of three residents reviewed for urinary catheter care, the facility did not ensure the indwelling catheter…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and staff interviews during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for 1 (Resident #66) of 1 resident reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Specifically, for Resident #66, the facility did not ensure the directions documented on the care card ensured the resident, who could not carry out activities of daily living independently, had her hair washed weekly to maintain good personal hygiene. This is evidenced by: Resident #66: The resident was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses of necrotizing fasciitis, diabetes and heart failure. The Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) dated 1/10/20, documented the resident was cognitively intact, could understand others and could make self understood. The Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled, Bed Bath last revised, 7/2019, documented the facility promoted cleanliness, provided comfort and observed the condition of the resident's skin, through the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-12 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interviews during the recertification survey the facility did not ensure the director of nursing served as a charge nurse only when the facility has an average daily occupancy of 60 or fewer residents. Specifically, the Director of Nursing served as a charge nurse when there were 77 residents residing on 2 units (North Unit and South Unit). This was evidenced by: Upon entrance to the facility on 2/6/20 at 8:30 AM, there were 77 residents residing on 2 units (North Unit and South Unit). During the Survey Entrance Conference on 02/06/20 at 08:41 AM, the facility Assistant Administrator stated that Registered Nurse #2 was the Director of Nursing (DON) for the facility and the Registered Nurse Manager (RNM) for the North Unit. During an interview on 02/10/20 at 12:24 PM, Registered Nurse #2 stated that she was both the RNM and the DON since November 2019. During an interview on 02/10/20 at 12:45 PM, the Administrator stated Registered Nurse #2 was both the DON and RNM. The Administrator was not aware that the regulation stated that a DON could not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principals for 1 (Resident #1) of 6 residents reviewed for medication administration. Specifically, for Resident #1, the facility did not ensure that the resident's narcotic record for pregabalin (Lyrica) (a controlled substance used for pain) documented the current physicians order. This is evidenced by: A policy titled Medication-Narcotic Management with a last revised date of 4/2019 documented that the information required on the bound narcotic book included resident name, the name of the medication, and the directions for administration. A policy titled Medication Administration with a last revised date of 12/2019 documented: Medications shall be administered as prescribed and the individual administering the medication must check the label three times to verify the right medication, right dosage, right time and right method (route) of administration before…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CENTERS HEALTH CARE — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.1-0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 53.8+1.2 vs chain
The other 35 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Buffalo Center For Rehabilitation And NursingBuffalo, NY 1 of 5Carthage Center For Rehabilitation And NursingCarthage, NY 1 of 5Delmar Center For Rehabilitation And NursingDelmar, NY 1 of 5Ellicott Center For Rehabilitation And NursingBuffalo, NY 1 of 5Granville Center For Rehabilitation And NursingGranville, NY 1 of 5Hammonton Center for Rehabilitation and HealthcareHammonton, NJ 1 of 5Hope Center for HIV and Nursing CareBronx, NY 1 of 5Oneida Center For Rehabilitation And NursingUtica, NY 1 of 5Onondaga Center for Rehabilitation and NursingMinoa, NY 1 of 5Ontario Center for Rehabilitation and HealthcareCanandaigua, NY 1 of 5Rochester Center for Rehabilitation and NursingRochester, NY 2 of 5Boro Park Center for Rehabilitation and HealthcareBrooklyn, NY 2 of 5Brooklyn Center for Rehabilitation and ResidentialBrooklyn, NY 2 of 5Deptford Center for Rehabilitation and HealthcareDeptford, NJ 2 of 5Fulton Center For Rehabilitation And HealthcareGloversville, NY 2 of 5Holliswood Center for Rehabilitation and HealthcarHollis, NY 2 of 5Martine Center For Rehabilitation And NursingWhite Plains, NY 2 of 5New Paltz Center For Rehabilitation And NursingNew Paltz, NY 2 of 5Richmond Center for Rehabilitation and Specialty HStaten Island, NY 2 of 5Schenectady Center For Rehabilitation And NursingSchenectady, NY 2 of 5Triboro Center for Rehabilitation and NursingBronx, NY 2 of 5Warren Center For Rehabilitation And NursingQueensbury, NY 3 of 5Beth Abraham Center for Rehabilitation and NursingBronx, NY 3 of 5Bronx Center For Rehabilitation & Health CareBronx, NY 3 of 5Bushwick Center for Rehabilitation and Health CareBrooklyn, NY 3 of 5Cooperstown Center For Rehabilitation And NursingCooperstown, NY 3 of 5Essex Center For Rehabilitation And HealthcareElizabethtown, NY 3 of 5Glens Falls Center For Rehabilitation And NursingGlens Falls, NY 3 of 5Steuben Center for Rehabilitation and HealthcareBath, NY 3 of 5Washington Center For Rehab And HealthcareArgyle, NY 4 of 5Corning Center for Rehabilitation and HealthcareCorning, NY 4 of 5Far Rockaway Center for Rehabilitation and NursingFar Rockaway, NY 4 of 5University Center for Rehabilitation and NursingBronx, NY 4 of 5Williamsbridge Center For Rehabilitation And NrsgBronx, NY 5 of 5Slate Valley Center For Rehabilitation And NursingGranville, NY

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
ROZENBERG, KENNETHIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY97%since 01/01/2025
GOLDMAN, NATHANIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/01/2025
HENDRIX, HEIDIIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/01/2025
LANTZITSKY, AHARONIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 01/01/2025
DESLAURIERS, MARTYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/30/2025
WALDMAN, JONATHANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+3.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.1M
Related-party expense12% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 69%Medicare 10%Other / private 21%

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$345per resident / day
operating cost
$10,503per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$357per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New York Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New York
$15,528/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$16,729/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,110/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 335280. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-02-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next