Beth Abraham Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

34.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 122 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 65.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 184 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 18% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 448 beds and averages 429.2 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 19 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.13 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.63 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.79 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.27 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 23% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2024-02-05 · tag F0570 — pattern
  Assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 1/29/2024 to 2/5/2024, the facility did not ensure a surety bond was purchased to secure all resident personal funds deposited with the facility. This was evident for 371 residents with personal funds accounts out of a census of 443 residents. Specifically, the facility's surety bond for $1,000,000.00 was not enough to cover the total resident personal funds account balance of $1,356,104.59. The findings are: The facility policy titled Resident Funds Account dated 8/2023 documented the facility shall hold, safeguard, manage and account for the personal funds of the residents. The facility's Personal Funds Surety Bond for resident accounts dated 3/15/2023 documented a surety bond totaling $1,000,000.00. The Resident Personal Funds Account balance as of 1/31/2024 documented a total balance of $1,356,104.59. There was no documented evidence the facility obtained a surety bond to cover the total amount of resident funds being held by the facility in personal funds accounts. On 2/1/2024 at 3:03 PM, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-05 · tag F0576 — pattern
  Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification survey from 1/29/2024 to 2/5/2024, the facility did not ensure that residents had the right to send and receive mail. This was evident for 11 (Resident #s 56, 263, 64, 30, 219, 165, 96, 155, 325, 201, 148, and 107) Resident Council participants out of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, the facility did not have a procedure in place for residents to send and receive mail on Saturday. The findings are: The facility policy titled Resident Mail dated 09/01/2023 documented resident mail will be delivered to the resident on the days there is mail delivery to the facility. On 01/31/2024 at 11:08 AM, during Resident Council Meeting, Resident #s 56, 263, 64, 30, 219, 165, 96, 155, 325, 201, 148, and 107 stated the facility did not deliver their mail on Saturday. All residents in attendance stated they were able to get mail in the community on Saturdays and did not know the reason mail was not delivered to them on Saturdays in the facility. On 02/02/2024 at 2:49 PM, the Assistant Administrator was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-05 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 1/29/2024 to 2/5/2024, the facility did not ensure an ongoing activities program was provided to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of the resident. This was evident for 5 (Residents #54, 83, 124, 276, and 295) of 5 residents reviewed for Activities out of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, 1) there was no evidence Resident #54 was engaged in a meaningful activity program, 2) there was no evidence Resident #295 was engaged in a meaningful activity program, 3) there was no evidence Resident #124 was engaged in a meaningful activity program, 4) Resident #83 was not observed to be engaged in a meaningful activity program, and 5) Resident # 276 was not observed engaged in a meaningful activity program. The findings include but are not limited to: The facility policy titled Activity Programs dated 5/2019 documented the facility must provide based on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-05 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 1/29/2024 to 2/5/2024, the facility did not ensure garbage and refuse were disposed of properly. This was evident during kitchen observation. Specifically, the facility garbage compactor did not have a door or cover to prevent the harborage and feeding of pests. The findings are: The facility policy titled Garbage and Rubbish Disposal dated 1/2023 documented that food related garbage and rubbish will be stored that is inaccessible to vermin. Outside dumpsters provided by garbage pick-up services will be kept closed and free of surrounding litter. On 1/30/2024 at 10:27 AM and 2/5/2024 at 12:24 PM, the outside garbage compactor was observed without a door or cover exposing garbage contained inside of the compactor. On 1/30/2024 at 10:35 AM, the Director of Food Service was interviewed and stated the compactor was not equipped with a door so it could be closed after garbage disposal. On 2/5/2024 at 12:15 PM, the Director of Housekeeping was interviewed and stated the compactor was not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-05 · tag F0568 — isolated
  Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 1/29/2024 to 2/5/2024, the facility did not ensure a resident, or their representative received their personal funds account statement on a quarterly basis. This was evident for 1 (Resident #55) of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, there was no documented evidence Resident #55, or their representative was provided with a quarterly personal funds statement. The findings are: The facility policy titled Resident Funds Account dated 8/2023 documented the Business Office will provide at least quarterly to the resident or the resident's representative, a statement showing the account balance including funds deposited, withdrawn, and interest accrued. Resident #55 had diagnoses of hypertension, and paraplegia. The Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #55 was moderately cognitively impaired. On 2/1/2024 at 3:53 PM, Resident #55's representative/power of attorney was interviewed and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-05 · tag F0569 — isolated
  Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from [DATE] to [DATE], the facility did not ensure that residents' personal funds deposited with the facility were conveyed to the individuals or probate jurisdiction administering the residents' estate within 30 days of death or discharge from the facility. This was evident for 3 (Resident #685, #686, and #687) of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, the facility did not convey the personal funds accounts for Resident #685, #686, and #687 to the probate jurisdiction administering the residents' estates within 30 days of expiration. The findings are: The facility policy titled Resident Funds Account dated 8/2023 documented upon resident death, the unutilized resident funds and final accounting of those funds shall be conveyed to the appointed executor or administrator of the resident's estate within 30 days. The Trial Balance of resident personal fund accounts as of [DATE] documented the following: - Resident #685 expired…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification survey from 1/29/2024 to 2/5/2024, facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse were reported immediately, but not later than two hours after occurrence, to the New York State Department of Health, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury. This was evident for 1 (Resident #227) of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, the facility did not report to the New York State Department of Health when Resident #227 had an unwitnessed incident resulting in a head laceration and left arm fracture. The findings are: Resident #227 had diagnoses of osteoporosis and dementia. The Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #227 had severe cognitive impairment. The facility Incident Report dated 10/24/2023 documented…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-05 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 1/29/2024 to 2/5/2024, the facility did not ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status. This was evident for 2 (Resident #34 and #84) of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, 1) Resident #34's Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment did not document the resident's hemodialysis treatment, and 2) Resident #84's Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment did not document the resident's discharge from hospice. The findings are: The facility policy titled Minimum Data Set 3.0 dated 4/2023 documented the assessment will accurately reflect the resident's status. 1) Resident #34 had diagnoses of hypertension and end stage renal disease. The Physician's Order dated 10/13/2023 documented Resident #34 had hemodialysis treatment every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday at 1:00 PM. There was no documented evidence the Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #34 received hemodialysis treatment. On 2/2/2024 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-05 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 1/29/2024 to 2/5/2024, the facility did not ensure that resident menus and dietary preferences were followed. This was evident for 2 (Resident #126 and Resident #340) of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, 1) Resident #126 did not receive food items listed on their lunch meal ticket, and 2) Resident #340 did not receive preferred food items listed on their meal ticket during lunch. The findings are: The facility policy titled Meal Service dated 1/2023 documented staff should check individual name, diet on the meal ticket to verify that meal is served to the correct person, and check items on the plate/tray to assure accuracy for therapeutic diets, texture, or consistency modifications. 1) Resident #126 had diagnoses of hypertension and anemia. The Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #126 was cognitively intact and required tray setup when eating. During an interview on 1/29/2024…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 1/29/2024 to 2/5/2024, the facility did not ensure infection control practices and procedures were maintained. This was evident for 1 (Unit 5ZP) of 12 resident units. Specifically, Certified Nursing Assistant #5 did not perform hand hygiene after having resident contact during lunch. The findings are: The facility policy titled Hand Hygiene dated 5/18/2023 documented hand hygiene was performed before and after contact with the resident. On 1/29/2024 at 1:09 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant #5 was observed in the Unit 5ZP floor during lunch assisting Resident #25, #189, #214, #231, and #253) with hand hygiene by holding the residents' hands and wiping them with hand wipes. Certified Nursing Assistant #5 did not change their gloves or perform hand hygiene between each resident contact. On 1/29/2024 at 1:11 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant #5 was interviewed and stated they were supposed to remove their gloves and wash their hands or use hand sanitizer between contact with residents. They…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CENTERS HEALTH CARE — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $8.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY