Holliswood Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcar

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

31.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 93 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 54.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 96 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 32% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 314 beds and averages 303.4 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.30 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.63 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.63 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.06 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.40 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.50 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 16% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2022-03-03 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — pattern
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification and abbreviated survey (NY# 00291493) from 02/23/2022 through 03/03/2022, the facility did not ensure that each resident remained free from physical restraints not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms. This was evident for 11 of 12 residents sampled for Physical Restraints (Resident #s 199, 260, 113, 191, 126, 110, 55, 295, 63, 503, and 157). Specifically, Resident #260 and Resident #113 had bilateral half SR ordered as enablers. The residents had severely impaired cognition, required extensive assistance with bed mobility and transfers, and the half SR were not identified as a restraint. There was no medical justification, restraint assessment, care plan, or evidence of alternatives attempted before using the bilateral half SR. Resident #s 191, 126, 110, 55, 295, 63, 503, and 157 had impaired cognition and required extensive assistance for bed mobility and transfers. They all had bilateral half siderails as an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 04/17/2024 to 04/24/2024, the facility did not ensure that infection control prevention practices and procedures were maintained. This was evident for 2 (Resident #276 and #127) of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, 1) Enhanced Barrier Precautions were not maintained during Foley catheter care for Resident #276, and 2) Enhanced Barrier Precautions were not maintained for gastrostomy tube medication administrations for Resident #127. The findings are: The facility policy titled Clinical Operations dated 5/18/2023 documented Enhanced Barrier Precautions are applicable for residents with infection or colonization of a multidrug-resistant organisms and indwelling medical devices (central line, urinary catheter, feeding tube, tracheostomy/ventilator). 1) Resident #276 had a diagnosis of obstructive uropathy and non-Alzheimer's dementia. The Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #276…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the recertification survey from on 04/17/2024 to 04/24/2024, the facility did not ensure the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. This was evident for 1 (Unit 4) of 5 resident units. Specifically, Unit 4 was observed with 1.) furniture heavily worn and in disrepair. 2.) torn and/or stained window curtains. 3.) stained privacy curtains. 4.) broken and chipped ceiling plaster. Torn room wallpaper. 5.) frame of room light fixture in disrepair. 6.) holes in walls/bathroom door. 7.) heavily stained and dirty toilet bowel. 8.) heavily stained, rusty, and dirty room commode. 9.) wheelchair with torn right-side armrest and layered dirt to the metal parts and wheel spokes. 10.) thick, orange-colored streaks of rust stains in the shower room stall. The ceiling tile surround the light fixture with rust stains. 11.) nurse front desk area layered with dirt/dust. 12.) loose rusty worn faucet handles. The findings are: On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification and Abbreviated (NY00331574) survey from 4/17/2024 to 4/24/2024, the facility did not ensure that a resident received quality of care. This was evident for 1 (Resident #266) of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #266 did not receive assessment by a qualified Registered Nurse following an injury of unknown origin and a fall. The findings are: The facility's policy titled Injuries of Unknown Etiology dated 11/2023 documented the Licensed Nurse on duty must report incidents and injuries to the on-duty Supervisor. Resident # 266 had diagnoses of Parkinson's disease and dementia. The Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #266 was moderately cognitively impaired and had 2 or more falls since their prior assessment. A Nursing Evaluation dated 4/14/2024 at 12:00 AM documented Licensed Practical Nurse #6 was called to the unit by the charge nurse. Resident #266 had swelling and discoloration to their…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 4/17/2024 to 4/24/2024, the facility did not ensure a resident received adequate supervision to prevent accident hazards. This was evident for 1 (Resident #104) of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #104's comprehensive care plan related to falls was not reviewed and revised to include supervision to prevent further accidents. The findings are: The facility's policy titled Falls Management and Prevention dated 1/2024 documented assessment and prevention of falls included staff reviewing and revising the interdisciplinary care plan after a fall event. Goals and interventions will be implemented based on the resident's individual needs. Resident #104 had diagnoses of schizophrenia and acute kidney failure. The Minimum Date Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #104 had moderately impaired cognition and 2 falls with no injury since the last assessment. The Comprehensive Care Plan…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-24 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification and Abbreviated (NY00331574) survey from 4/17/2024 to 4/24/2024, the facility did not ensure licensed nurses had the competencies and skills necessary to care for a resident's needs. This was evident for 1 (Resident #266) of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #266 did not receive assessment by a qualified Registered Nurse following an injury of unknown origin and a fall. The findings are: The facility's policy titled Injuries of Unknown Etiology dated 11/2023 documented the Licensed Nurse on duty must report incidents and injuries to the on-duty Supervisor. Resident # 266 had diagnoses of Parkinson's disease and dementia. The Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #266 was moderately cognitively impaired and had 2 or more falls since their prior assessment. A Nursing Evaluation dated 4/14/2024 at 12:00 AM documented Licensed Practical Nurse #6 was called to the unit by the charge nurse. Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2) On 02/23/22 at 10:06 AM, in room [ROOM NUMBER], five holes approximately the size of dimes were observed in the wall next to the paper towel dispenser. On 02/24/22 at 08:41 AM, 02/28/22 at 11:31 AM, 03/01/22 at 09:44 AM, and 03/02/22 at 09:37 AM the same was observed. On 03/02/22 at 12:47 PM, the Maintenance Worker (MW) # 1 was interviewed. MW #1 stated they were not regularly assigned to the 5th floor. The MW assigned to the floor will make daily rounds and report back to the supervisor with any issues. MW #1 stated the supervisor makes rounds on all the units once a week. The State Agent (SA) showed MW #1 the holes in the wall in room [ROOM NUMBER]. MW #1 was not aware of the holes in the wall in room [ROOM NUMBER]. MW #1 stated the soap dispenser was missing from the wall. MW #1 stated they will replace the soap dispenser. On 03/02/22 at 01:07 PM, MW #1 followed up with the maintenance supervisor. MW #1 stated the supervisor stated the resident continuously rips the soap dispenser out of the wall and the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-03-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews conducted during the Recertification and Complaint survey, the facility did not ensure procured food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards of food service safety. Specifically, expired thickened apple juice stored in the kitchen storeroom was not discarded on or before the expiration date. This was evident during the Kitchen Observation facility task. The findings are: 1) The facility policy and procedure titled, Food Storage Policy revised /25/2022 documented all stock must be rotated with each new order received. Rotating sock is essential to assure the freshness and highest quality of all foods. Old stock is always used first (first in-first out method). Supervise the person designated to put away to make sure it is rotated properly. The policy Thickened Liquids revised 05/2019 documented the food service department must serve pre-thickened and/or thickened all beverages and soups to residents on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-03-03 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — pattern
  Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification survey the facility did not ensure a quality assurance and performance improvement (QAPI) program that put forth good faith attempts to identify and correct quality deficiencies. Specifically, the facility had repeat deficiencies from the previous recertification surveys (May 2019 & December 2017) in the areas of right to be free from physical restraints (F604) and care plan timing and revision (657). There was no evidence there was a QAPI plan in place to meet the specific needs of the facility. Findings include: The facility Policy & Procedure titled, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Plan dated 1/1/2021 documented the facility will develop, implement, and maintain an ongoing, facility-wide QAPI plan designed to monitor and evaluate the quality and safety of resident care, pursue methods to improve care quality, and resolve identified problems. The policy further documented it will provide structure and processes to correct identified quality and/or safety deficiencies, establish…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interviews conducted during the Recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that it maintained an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, (1) multiple residents were not offered hand hygiene before lunch and dinner meals on the 2nd Floor unit. (2) Multiple residents receiving oxygen therapy were noted with oxygen tubing touching the floor on multiple occasions and oxygen tubing was observed being stored without a plastic covering wrapped around the top of the oxygen concentrator on the 4th floor. This was evident for the dining observations on the 2nd floor and a random infection control observations on 2 out of 6 resident units. (Unit 2 and Unit 4) The findings are: 1) The facility policy and procedure titled Hand washing reviewed Handwashing reviewed 1/20212021 documented the facility considers hand…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-03-03 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that a resident's designated representative was informed of a change in medication. Specifically, an antipsychotic medication was initiated, discontinued, and restarted without documented evidence the family was made aware. This was evident for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for Notification of Change (Resident #272). The finding is: The facility policy for notification dated 4/2019 documented: except in a medical emergency, the facility must consult with the resident immediately if the resident is competent and notify the residents physician and designated representative when there is: a need to alter treatment significantly (to commence a new form of treatment). Significant change in treatment a) nurse will promptly notify the resident and/or representative of any changes in resident care and treatment initiated by nursing measure or physician order, b) examples of alteration in treatment-…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CENTERS HEALTH CARE — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $6.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY