Triboro Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

29.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 82 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 47.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 105 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 31% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 515 beds and averages 397.1 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 118 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.43 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.31 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.11 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.59 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.36 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 33% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2026-05-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during survey, the facility failed to ensure that residents are free from resident-to-resident abuse. This was evident for two (2) out of five (5) residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) sampled. Specifically, on 04/17/2026 at 2:30 PM, Resident #1 unscrewed the handle from a mechanical lift and used it to strike Resident #2 on the left side of the head. Resident #2 was assessed and observed with a four (4)-centimeter raised area to the left side of the head as well as a 0.4-centimeter open area on the pad of the left index finger. Emergency Medical Services (911) was called and Resident #2 was transferred to the emergency room for evaluation and returned to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 was transferred to the emergency room for psychiatric evaluation and returned to the facility with no new orders. Resident #1 and Resident #2 were placed on separate floors. This resulted in actual harm to Resident #2 that was not Immediate Jeopardy.The findings…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: 6Number of residents cited: 1 Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident was free from chemical restraints imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience and not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms. This was evident for one (1) of six (6) residents (Resident #425) reviewed for Unnecessary Meds, Chemical Restraints/Psychotropic Meds, and Med Regimen Review, out of 38 sampled residents investigated. Specifically, Resident #425 was administered psychotropic drugs without an appropriate diagnosis, there was no documentation of behaviors to support the ongoing use of psychotropic medications, and there was no evidence of monitoring for effectiveness or side effects.The findings are:The facility policy and procedure titled Psychotropic Medication dated 10/2024, last revised 04/28/2025 state psychotropic medications may be prescribed for and administered to residents in accordance with current standards of practice and State and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: 2Number of residents cited: 1 Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse were reported immediately to the New York State Department of Health but not later than 2 hours after the alleged occurrence. This was evident for one (1) of two (2) residents (Resident #426) reviewed for Abuse out of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #426 sustained an unwitnessed injury to the upper right eyelid which they could not explain, which was not reported to Department of Health. The findings are: The facility policy titled Abuse Prevention dated 07/18/2025 stated the facility must report alleged violations related to mistreatment, exploitation, neglect, or abuse including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property and report the results of all investigations to all the proper authorities within prescribed timeframes. The policy also stated alleged violations involving abuse, neglect,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: 6Number of residents cited: 1 Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident's comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised to accurately reflect the needs of the resident and in response to current interventions. This was evident for one (1) of six (6) residents (Resident #425) reviewed for Unnecessary Meds, Chemical Restraints/Psychotropic Meds, and Med Regimen Review, out of 38 sampled residents. Specifically, there was no documented evidence that Resident #425's comprehensive care plan for psychoactive medications was reviewed and revised after medications were adjusted. The findings are:The facility policy and procedure titled Care Plans-Comprehensive dated 10/2015, last revised 08/02/2024 stated assessments of residents are ongoing, and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' conditions change.Resident #425 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included Non-Alzheimer's Dementia,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of Residents sampled: 5Number of Residents cited: 1 Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident received adequate supervision to prevent an accident. This was evident for one (1) of five (5) residents (Resident #269) reviewed for Accidents out of 38 sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #269 was provided with one person assistance instead of two-person assistance during care on 09/12/2025. Certified Nursing Assistant #4 attempted to turn Resident #269 onto their right side at which time Resident #269 rolled off the bed sustaining a left parietal (area in the skull) hematoma (a collection of clotted blood outside a blood vessel that may occur due to injury or disease) with a laceration and right upper face skin excoriation (damage to the surface of the skin). The findings include:The facility policy titled Accident-Incidents last revised 06/02/2024 stated it is the policy of the facility to monitor and evaluate all the occurrences of accidents or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-28 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 2/21/2024 through 2/28/2024, the facility did not ensure reasonable accommodation of a resident's needs and preferences. This was evident for 1 (Resident #46) of 38 sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #46 was unable to transfer out of bed because the facility did not have a functioning bariatric Hoyer (mechanical) lifter. The findings are: The facility policy titled Quality of Life/Accommodation of Needs dated 10/2023 documented the resident's individual needs and preferences will be accommodated to the extent possible, except when the health and safety of the individual or other residents would be endangered. Resident #46 was admitted with the diagnoses that include Heart Failure and Diabetes Mellitus. The Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #45 was cognitively intact. On 2/21/2024 at 1:02 PM, Resident #46 was interviewed and stated they were unable to transfer out of bed and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-28 · tag F0568 — isolated
  Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 2/21/2024 to 2/28/2024, the facility did not ensure a resident's financial records were made available through quarterly statements. This was evident for 1 (Resident #247) of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #247 did not receive their quarterly Resident Fund Statements in writing within 30 days of the end of the quarter. The findings are: The facility policy titled Resident Funds Account dated 8/2023 documented the resident, designated representative, or legal representative will be provided, at least quarterly, with a statement showing the account balance, funds deposited and withdrawn, and interest accrued. Resident #247 had diagnoses of hypertension and heart failure. The Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #247 had mild cognitive impairment. On 2/21/2024 at 10:03 AM and 2/27/2024 at 11:11 AM, Resident #247 was interviewed and stated they did not receive quarterly statements in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-28 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 2/21/2024 to 2/28/2024, the facility did not ensure an activities program was provided to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of the residents. This was evident for 1 (Resident #57) of 5 residents reviewed for Activities out of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #57 was not engaged in meaningful activity programs in accordance with their preferences and needs. The findings are: The facility policy titled Recreation Programming dated 12/2023 based on comprehensive assessment, individualized care plan, and the preferences of each resident, an ongoing program of recreational services to support residents in their choice of activities were provided. The recreational programs/activities were designed to meet the interest of and support each resident's physical, cognitive, social, emotional, psychosocial, and spiritual wellbeing. Resident #57 had diagnoses…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-28 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 2/21/2024 to 2/28/2024, the facility did not ensure a resident was given psychotropic medication to treat a specific condition as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record. This was evident for 1 (Resident #213) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medication out of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #213 was not provided with nonpharmacological interventions to address behavior and was prescribed psychotropic medication without an appropriate diagnosis. The findings are: The facility policy titled Antipsychotic Medication Use dated 6/21/2023 documented residents will only receive antipsychotic medications when necessary to treat specific conditions for which they are indicated and effective. The Attending Physician and other staff will gather and document information to clarify the resident's behavior mood, function, medical condition, specific symptoms, and risk to the resident.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the record review and interviews conducted during the recertification and abbreviated (NY00328119 and NY00323553) survey from 2/21/2024 to 2/28/2024, the facility did not ensure alleged violations involving abuse were reported to the New York State Department of Health immediately, but no later than 2 hours, after the allegation was made, and the investigation conclusion was reported within 5 working days of the alleged violation. This was evident for 3 (Resident #81, #456, and #293) of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, 1) the investigation conclusion for a resident-to-resident altercation involving Resident #81 and #456 was not reported to the New York State Department of Health within 5 days of occurrence, and 2) Resident #293's allegation they were verbally abused by Licensed Practical Nurse #2 was not reported to the New York State Department of Health. The findings are: The facility policy titled Abuse dated 2/2023 documented reporting of suspected or alleged resident abuse or mistreatment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-28 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification and Abbreviated (NY00323553) Survey from 02/21/2024 to 02/28/2024, the facility did not ensure an allegation of abuse was thoroughly investigated. This was evident for 1 (Resident #293) of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, an investigation of Resident #293's allegation of verbal abuse against Licensed Practical Nurse #2 was not completed. The findings are: The facility policy titled Abuse dated 2/2023 documented allegations of suspected abuse shall be promptly and thoroughly investigated by facility management with witness statements from staff, residents, visitors, and family members who may be interviewable and may have information regarding the allegation. Resident #293 had diagnoses of diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease. The Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #293 was cognitively intact. During an interview on 2/22/2024 at 11:07 AM, Resident #293 stated, in 9/2023, Licensed Practical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CENTERS HEALTH CARE — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $5.9M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY