No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

McCrea Manor Nsng And Rehab Ctr LLC

2040 McCrea Street, Alliance, OH 44601 · For profit - Corporation · 84 certified beds · (330) 823-9005 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (330) 823-9005 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0744)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (68%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
Aultworks1.1 mi
2461 W State St · (330) 823-8864 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Pharmacy1.0 mi
1800 W. State
Grocery
Aldi0.9 mi
2150 W State St · (855) 955-2534 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1675 Westwood Ave · (330) 455-9100 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1520 S Sawburg Rd · (330) 821-4321

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.1%5.3%15.4%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.8%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.8%0.4%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms54.0%30.1%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.8%3.2%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened6.9%6.1%16.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication15.7%25.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine82.3%94.5%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.3%3.4%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.6%21.4%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table3.7%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine46.4%75.6%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission31.6%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.1%12.9%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.851.731.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days4.411.801.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 29 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

55.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.45U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.19hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.23hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.45 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 76% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF55.8%CMS range 42.5–66.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.4%CMS range 7.7–16.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.351.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.51
RN hours/ resident / day
0.52
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.00
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.03
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.36
RN hoursweekends
67.9%
Total nursing turnover
76.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 84 beds and averages 64.4 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.03 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.00 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.74 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.15 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.57 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 68% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-18)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-28)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed timely. This affected one resident (#70) of three residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility census was 65.Findings include:Review of the closed medical record for Resident #70 revealed an admission date of 02/19/25 and a discharge date of 03/04/26. Diagnoses included but not limited to age related osteoporosis, hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease with heart failure stage 3, COPD, type 2 diabetes mellitus, multiple fractures of ribs, right side, of right ulna styloid process, nondisplaced fracture of shaft of right radios, and protein-calorie malnutrition.Review of the handwritten physician orders dated 02/17/26 for Resident #70 revealed an order for one (1) Liter (L) of Normal Saline (NS) 100 cubic centimeters per hour (CC/HR) of Intravenous fluids. The handwritten order was signed by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) # 202 and dated 02/18/26.Review of the medication administration records (MARS) and treatment administration records (TARS) for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based interview, observation, record review, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure smoking supplies were locked and secured. This affected one (Resident #62) out of three residents reviewed for smoking. The facility census was 65.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #62 revealed an admission date of 03/04/21 with diagnoses including but not limited to hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, acute chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, epilepsy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), alcohol abuse, cannabis use, and tobacco use.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #62 had intact cognition.Review of the care plan for Resident #62 dated 02/13/26 revealed he is at risk for injury related to smoking, cigarettes and electronic device. Interventions included supervision at all times while smoking, smoking apron to be worn while smoking, and smoking items to be kept at the nurses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure narcotic medications were administered per physician orders and reconciled properly. This affected one resident (Resident #71) of three residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 65. Findings include:1.Review of the medical record for Resident #71 revealed an admission dare of 01/29/26 and a discharge date of 02/26/26 to home with diagnoses including but not limited to encephalopathy, low back pain, spinal stenosis cervical region and anxiety.Review of the care plan dated 01/29/26, revealed Resident #71 was at increased risk of adverse reactions related to taking opiates. Interventions included to administer medications as ordered by physician and monitor for side effects of medication.Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #71 had intact cognition. Review of physician orders dated for February 2026, revealed Resident #71 was ordered Klonopin (Clonazepam), 0.5…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-12-18 · tag F0887 — widespread
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and policy review the facility failed to ensure Resident #26 and Resident #4 timely received COVID-19 vaccines and failed to develop a policy related to the administration of COVID-19 vaccines for residents. This affected two residents (Resident #4 and Resident #26) out of five residents reviewed for COVID-19 vaccinations and had the potential to affect all 58 residents in the facility. The facility census was 58. 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 02/19/2025. Diagnoses included diabetes mellitus, muscle weakness, COPD, and anxiety. The resident was assessed to be cognitively intact.Review of Resident # 26's Covid-19 Vaccine Consent Form revealed the resident consented to receive the Covid-19 vaccine on 10/09/25.Review of Resident #26's Immunizations revealed she had not received any COVID-19 vaccines.Review of Resident #26's December 2025 physician orders revealed the facility had not yet ordered the COVID-19 vaccine for the resident.Interview on 12/18/25 at 9:15 A.M. Resident #26 reported she signed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #13 was provided appropriate dishware and silverware to promote the resident's dignity. This finding affected one (Resident #13) of three residents reviewed for dignity while dining.Findings include:Review of the dietary communication list revealed 11 residents currently received disposable utensils/dishes including Resident #9, #11, #13, #14 (requested), #21 (plastic spoon and fork only), #26, #35, #46 (plastic spoon and fork only), #51, #54 and #59. Review of Resident #13's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including major depressive disorder, essential hypertension and generalized anxiety disorder.Review of Resident #13's Diet Communication form dated 07/03/24 revealed the resident was to have disposables only on trays due to smokeless tobacco being discarded into mugs and bowls.Review of Resident #13's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #49's fall interventions were consistently implemented. This finding affected one (Resident #49) of five residents reviewed for accidents.Findings include: Review of Resident #49's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, and anxiety disorder.Review of Resident #49's Fall Care Plan revealed an intervention dated 06/25/25 to toilet (take to toilet to use restroom) the resident after meals.Review of Resident #49's Fall Risk Evaluation form dated 08/02/25 revealed the resident was at risk for falls.Review of Resident #49's progress note dated 09/03/25 at 12:54 P.M. revealed at approximately 11:40 A.M., the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) had witnessed a resident fall onto their bottom in the dining room. The nurse assessed the resident who denied pain and did not hit her head. The resident was able to get up with no injuries. The family and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and policy review the facility failed to ensure Resident #26 timely received the pneumococcal vaccine. This affected one resident (Resident #26) out of five residents reviewed for pneumococcal vaccinations. The facility census was 58. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 02/19/2025. Diagnoses included diabetes mellitus, muscle weakness, COPD, and anxiety. The resident was assessed to be cognitively intact.Review of Resident # 26's Pneumococcal Vaccine Consent Form revealed the resident consented to receive the pneumococcal vaccine on 10/09/25.Review of Resident #26's Immunizations revealed she has not received any documented pneumococcal vaccines.Review of Resident #26's December 2025 physician orders revealed the facility had not yet ordered the pneumococcal vaccine for the resident.Interview on 12/18/25 at 9:15 A.M. Resident #26 reported she signed a consent in October stating she wanted the pneumococcal vaccine. She continued that she has not yet received the vaccine.Interview on 12/18/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical records, review of manufacturer information, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure opened insulin pens were dated for proper use and disposal. This affected four residents (Resident #28, #46, #68, and #71) from two of three medication carts observed for medication storage. Findings include: 1. During observation of medication preparation and administration on [DATE] between 10:28 A.M. and 10:38 A.M., Registered Nurse (RN) #105 was observed preparing and administering medication to Resident #68. RN #105 administered 24 units of insulin Lispro for a blood sugar level of 269. The Kwik-pen used did not have an open date recorded but was delivered to the facility on [DATE]. RN #105 was made aware the Kwik-pen did not have an open date on it prior to administration and the delivery date and acknowledged she agreed with the information shared. Review of manufacturer information for insulin Lispro revealed the Kwik-pen should not be used for more than 28 days after the pen use…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-15 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of menus with spreadsheets, policy review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure appropriate portion sizes were served. This affected 33 residents with the potential to affect 69 of 70 residents in the facility as one resident (Resident #24) had an order for no food by mouth. The census was 70. Findings include: Review of the menu spreadsheet revealed four ounces of the rice pilaf was to be served except for those residents on carbohydrate controlled diets who were supposed to receive three ounces. Observations of the tray line on 04/07/25 at 11:15 A.M. revealed the facility was serving two ounces of rice pilaf. This was verified by [NAME] #120 at the time of the observation. [NAME] #120 was referred to the spreadsheet and verified the incorrect amount of rice pilaf had already been served. The facility identified Residents #2, #5, #6, #8, #11, #13, #14, #18, #21, #22, #23, #25, #27, #31, #32, #34, #35, #37, #39, #40, #48, #50, #53, #54, #55, #57, #59, #60, #62, #64, #65, #67, and #68 as those residents who received the inappropriate portion sizes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-15 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the environment in a clean and sanitary condition. This affected twelve residents (Resident #4, #8, #10, #15, #18, #23, #24, #27, #28, #36, #38, and #57) of fifteen resident rooms observed for cleanliness. Findings include: 1. During observation of medication administration in Resident #27's room on 04/07/25 at 9:17 A.M., it was observed the floor was dirty. Resident #27 had a urinal on the floor under his bed. The stripping on the side of Resident #36's over bed table had pulled away from the surface on one long side of the table and ½ of one short side. On 04/07/23 at 9:23 A.M. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)/med tech #125 verified the table was in disrepair and stated the floor could be cleaner. On 04/07/25 at 9:50 A.M., the Administrator verified the environmental concerns identified in Resident #27's room. 2. During observation of medication administration in Resident #24's on 04/09/25 at 9:37 A.M., a used toothette was observed on the floor near the trash can. A disposable glove was noted on the floor inside…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-15 · tag F0551 — isolated
    Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to honor Resident #3's choice in showers. This affected one (Resident #3) of three residents reviewed for resident rights Finding include: Review of Resident #3's open medical record revealed diagnoses including chronic kidney disorder, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, generalized muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care and contracture. A care plan initiated 01/09/23 indicated Resident #3 needed assistance from staff to meet Activities of Daily Living (ADL) needs related to impaired mobility with decreased physical functioning and general debility following hospitalization with lymphedema and multiple wounds. Interventions included assisting Resident #3 with bathing as needed per resident's preference. A nursing note dated 03/15/25 at 11:51 P.M. indicated Resident #3 was offered a shower by staff during the shift. Resident #8 refused. The nurse spoke with Resident #3's Power of Attorney (POA) via Resident #3's personal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure ordered medication was available for administration. This affected three residents (Resident #15, #31, #32) of three residents reviewed for pharmacy services. Findings include: 1. On 04/09/25 at 8:45 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #100 was observed administering medication to Resident #31. As LPN #100 was preparing the medications she verified Resident #31 did not have Clopidrogel (anti-platelet) available for administration. 2. Review of Resident #15's open medical record revealed diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus with a foot ulcer, generalized muscle weakness, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), polyneuropathy, hyperlipidemia, morbid obesity, anxiety, depression, non-pressure chronic ulcer of the right foot, and protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of the March 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed an electronic MAR note on 03/12/25 indicating Losartan Potassium, Amlodipine and another unspecified medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-15 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of physician orders, review of manufacturer information, policy review and interview, the facility failed to administer medication as ordered and/or in accordance with manufacturer guidance. Four medication errors out of 31 opportunities for error were identified resulting in a 12.9% error rate. This affected two (Residents #31 and #68) of six residents observed for medication administration. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #31's physician orders revealed Clopidrogel bisulfate 75 mg was ordered once a day in the morning. The start date was 02/15/25. Review of physician orders indicated an order dated 02/18/25 for one multivitamin every day in the morning, with no indication for minerals. On 04/09/25 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #100 was observed preparing medication for administration to Resident #31 at 8:45 A.M. During the preparation, LPN #100 stated she had no Clopidrogel bisulfate (anti-platelet) 75 milligrams (mg) available for administration. LPN #100 verified she was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-15 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was served at a palatable, safe temperature. This affected one (Resident #37) of seven residents interviewed regarding the lunch meal served on 04/07/25. Findings include: On 04/07/25 between 11:15 A.M. and 12:02 P.M., the lunch tray line was observed. Incorrect information was provided to the surveyor regarding carts that had been served. At 12:02 P.M., the cook indicated she only had three trays lift to serve but they were waiting on residents to indicate if they were going to the dining room or eating in their rooms. Meals were prepared and placed in the warmer. On 04/07/25 at 12:03 P.M., a test tray was prepared directly from the steam table. The temperature of the fish was 111 degrees Fahrenheit. [NAME] #120 stated the fish should have been 145 degrees when served. The fish tasted cool. On 04/07/25 at 1:53 P.M., Resident #37 reported she did not like the fish served for lunch. It was cold and did not taste good. Review of the facility's Food Temperature Guidelines (revised August 2008) revealed hot foods…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of medical records, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete to accurately reflect medications being administered or not. This affected two (Residents #15 and #17) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #15's open medical record revealed diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus with a foot ulcer, generalized muscle weakness, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), polyneuropathy, hyperlipidemia, morbid obesity, anxiety, depression, non-pressure chronic ulcer of the right foot, and protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of the March 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed no documentation of morning medications being administered on 03/13/25. Ordered medications included mag ox (supplement) 400 milligrams (mg), Fluoxetine (antidepressant) 40 mg, Buspirone (anti-anxiety) 10 mg, Pantoprazole sodium (used to reduce stomach acid production) 40 mg, Metformin (anti-diabetic) 750 mg, Meloxicam…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-04 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, review of Self-Reported Incident, review of witness statement, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff provided appropriate dementia care when Resident #57, who had a diagnosis of dementia with mood disturbance/other behavioral disturbances and resided on the secured memory care unit, began to display resistive-to-care behaviors. This affected one (Resident #57) of three residents reviewed for dementia care. Sixteen residents (Residents #66, #62, #55, #52, #40, #57, #37, #49, #15, #68, #21, #45, #47, #41, #28 and #23) had a diagnosis of dementia and resided in the secured memory care unit. The census was 70. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #57 revealed an admission date of 04/09/23 with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, dementia with mood disturbance, dementia with other behavior disturbances, and anxiety disorder. Resident #57's power of attorney (POA) was his wife. Resident #57 resided on the secured memory care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary condition. This had the potential to affect 110 of 111 residents receiving food from the kitchen. Resident #45 was identified as receiving no food from the kitchen. The facility census was 68. Findings include: Initial tour of the kitchen on 08/25/24 from 8:10 A.M. to 8:32 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #238 revealed the floor was dirty with food splatter, pieces of paper, and dried food debris especially underneath equipment. The microwave had food splatter on all sides of the microwave and had burnt food on the bottom. The grill had food residue on it and the grill pan was filled with french fries and food pieces. The prep table that the grill was sitting on had food debris on it. Dietary Manager (DM) #238 stated that the grill was electric and there was no power for it, so they did not use it for cooking. Observation inside the walk-in refrigerator revealed an undated food container on the floor with no label to identify what was inside of it. In addition,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-28 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided activities on the memory care unit. This affected 15 ( #8, #11, #16, #24, #26, #27, #35, #42, #44, #47, #49, #52, #53, #55, and #57) of 16 residents residing on the memory care unit. Resident #31 was identified as a resident taken off the memory care unit for activities. The facility census was 68. Findings include: Observation on 08/26/24 at 3:02 P.M. of the memory care dining room revealed the television was on the music channel, few residents were sitting at the tables, and agency State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #500 was sitting at a table eating potato chips, drinking pop, and looking at her phone. STNA #500 stated she was on a small break and not there to do activities. Observation and interview on 08/26/24 at 3:30 P.M. revealed STNA #236 was coming out of a male resident's room and standing near the doorway. STNA #236 stated that she was trying to redirect a female resident out of the male resident's room. STNA #236 stated that she was standing at the doorway to keep…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #9's wound related treatments were implemented as ordered; Resident #18's skin was assessed and treatments were applied as ordered; Resident #34's thrombo-embolic deterrent (TED) hose and geriatric sleeves were implemented as ordered; and Resident #45's percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube dressing was implemented as ordered. This affected three (Residents #9, #18 and #34) of three residents reviewed for general skin conditions; and one (Resident #45) of one resident reviewed for PEG tube care. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 05/25/23 with diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus with other circulatory complications, diabetic neuropathy, intervertebral disc degeneration of the lumbar region, fibromyalgia, depressive disorder, and stage three kidney disease. Review of the active diagnoses further revealed an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident comprehensive care plans were updated and individualized, or that staff were aware of the resident's current smoking status and interventions. This affected four residents (#9, #13, #17 and #31) of six residents (#9, #13, #17, #31, #52, and #59) who were reviewed for smoking. The facility also failed to ensure Resident #53 was free of accidents hazards. This affected one out of three residents reviewed for falls ( #8, #53, and #59). The facility census was 68. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 05/25/23 with diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus with other circulatory complications, diabetic neuropathy, intervertebral disc degeneration of the lumbar region, fibromyalgia, depressive disorder, diabetic foot ulcer, unspecified wound to the left lower leg, and stage three kidney disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure contact isolation was maintained as ordered for Resident #50. This affected 12 residents who resided on the B unit where Resident #50 resided (Residents #1, #3, #4, #20, #28, #29, #30, #39, #54, #58, #59 and #115). Facility census was 68. Findings include: Review of Resident #50's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia and heimparesis, bipolar disorder and polyneuropathy. Review of Resident #50's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited intact cognition. Review of Resident #50's physician orders revealed an order dated 08/30/24 for contact isolation due to active herpes simplex virus (HSV) outbreak. Observation of the signage of Resident #50's door on 08/25/24 at 2:40 P.M. revealed the resident was in enhanced barrier precautions. Interview on 08/25/24 at 3:04 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the signage on Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Residents #4 and #19's pressure ulcer wound care was completed as ordered. This affected two ( #4 and #19) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcer wounds. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #4's medical record revealed the resident was originally admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure with hypercapnia, multiple sclerosis and chronic pain syndrome. Review of Resident #4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited intact cognition. Review of Resident #4's skin care plans revealed an intervention dated 07/24/24 for treatments as ordered by the physician. Resident #4 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and returned on 07/24/24. Review of Resident #4's Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment form dated 07/23/24 revealed the resident's pressure sore risk was 15 or low risk of developing pressure ulcer wounds. Review of Resident #4's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's oxygen flow rate was set as ordered by the physician. This affected one (Resident #34) of two residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility identified nine residents who received oxygen therapy. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, dementia, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, and atrial fibrillation. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/05/24, revealed Resident #34's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 14, which indicated intact cognition. There were no behaviors or rejection of care. The resident received oxygen therapy. Review of the Care Plan, dated 10/16/23, revealed Resident #34 was at risk for alteration in air exchange with the intervention to administer oxygen as ordered. Review of physician order, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #34's room was maintained in good repair. This affected one (#34) of 22 residents reviewed for environmental concerns. Facility census was 68. Findings include: Observation of Resident #34's room on 08/28/24 at 1:00 P.M. with Maintenance Director #2115 revealed four holes in the drywall which appeared recessed behind the resident's recliner and the electrical outlet was damaged and recessed into the wall. Interview on 08/28/24 at 1:02 P.M. with Maintenance Director #2115 confirmed Resident #34's room was not maintained in good repair.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-09 · tag F0778 — isolated
    Help the resident make transportation arrangements to and from radiology services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Residents #14 and #24 were provided appropriate transportation for scheduled appointments. This finding affected two (Residents #14 and #24) of three residents reviewed for appointments. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #14's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, major depressive disorder and weakness. Review of Resident #14's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited intact cognition. Review of Resident #14's physician orders revealed an order dated 12/26/23 for surgery for a nephrostomy tube placement with the time to be determined. Review of Resident #14's Appointment form dated 12/26/23 revealed the resident was scheduled to go to the radiology department for surgery. Review of Resident #14's progress note dated 12/26/23 at 12:47 P.M. authored by the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated Resident #14's doctor office was called on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-21 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure staff were competent to identify and use the emergency release features of mechanical hoyer lift devices. This had the potential to affect all 24 residents (#6, #8, #12, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #21, #23, #24, #26, #27, #28, #38, #41, #43, #44, #48, #52, #53, #55, #58, and #63) who required a mechanical hoyer lift for transfers. The census was 63. Findings include: On 12/21/23 at 12:33 P.M., observation revealed State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #104 and STNA #183 transferred Resident #27 from his wheelchair to his bed using a mechanical hoyer lift device. Observation of the device revealed it had a pin hole emergency release button next to the red emergency stop button on the side of the device. On 12/21/23 at 12:45 P.M., observation of STNA #104 and STNA #183 revealed they were unable to identify the emergency release button on the device they had used to transfer Resident #27. Interview at the time of observation with STNA #104 and STNA #183 both stated the device did not have an emergency release button. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-07 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident lift devices had functioning locking wheels. This had the potential to affect three (Residents #5, #7 and #13) identified as utilizing a sit to stand lift device for transfer assistance. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Observation on 08/07/23 at 9:40 A.M. revealed a sit to stand lift (assistive device permitting transfer between bed and chair or other similar resting places by the use of hydraulic or electric power) in the hallway of the facility. Observation revealed the left rear wheel/caster to have a missing and non-functional lock. The missing lock caused the sit to stand lift to spin in a circle due to the locked right wheel and missing left wheel lock. On 08/07/23 at 9:53 A.M. interview with Maintenance Director (MD) #75 verified the sit to stand lift was missing the lock device for the left rear wheel causing the devices to be unsteady when used. On 08/07/23 at 10:00 A.M. interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #82 also verified the sit to stand lift was missing the lock device for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-07-14 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings were held every quarter. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 47. Findings include: Review of the facilities sign-in sheet for the QA meeting minutes for the meetings held on July 2021 to April 2022 revealed no evidence the Quality Assurance (QA) meetings were held as required. Interview with the Administrator on 07/14/22 at 9:24 A.M. verified the QAPI meetings were not held from July 2021 to April 2022. The Administrator verified QAPI meetings are to be held every quarter.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-07-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide a dignified dining experience for five residents (Resident #3, #4, #36, #37 & #44) of 17 residents reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 47. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed an admission date of 07/21/21 with diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease, gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), chronic kidney disease and polyosteoarthritis. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 was totally dependent on staff for eating. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #4 revealed an admission date of 02/22/19 with diagnoses of depression, anemia, dementia and hypothyroidism. Review of the quarterly MDS 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #4 was totally dependent on staff for eating. 3. Review of the medical record for Resident #36 revealed an admission date of 09/07/12 with diagnoses of dementia, depression, anemia and dysphagia. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-07-14 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure families/representatives were notified in writing of resident transfers to the hospital. This affected three Residents (Resident #9, #33 and #46) of three Residents reviewed for hospitalizations. The facility census was 47. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 06/23/22 with diagnoses of dementia, schizoaffective disorder, diabetes and anxiety. Review of a progress note dated 05/26/22 revealed the resident was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility on [DATE]. Review of both the electronic and paper charts revealed no evidence the resident's emergency contact was notified in writing of the discharge. Review of the medical record for Resident #33 revealed an admission date of 08/13/20 with diagnoses of dementia, psychosis, depression and Alzheimer's. Review of a progress note dated 07/07/22 the resident was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and returned to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-07-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #25 and #36 had a comprehensive care plan developed and implemented to meet their care and service needs. This affected two (#25 and #36) of 17 residents reviewed for a comprehensive care plan. The facility census was 47. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #25 revealed an admission dated of 04/29/22 with diagnoses including essential hypertension, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and bipolar disorder. Review of Resident #25's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #25 had intact cognition and it was very important to Resident #25 to have reading materials, be able to listen to music, and to keep up with the news. Review of Resident #25's Activity assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #25 had an interest in reading, gardening, music, exercise, shopping, and watching television/movies. Review of Resident #25's social services notes dated 05/02/22 and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #33's laboratory blood tests were completed as ordered. This finding affected one (Resident #33) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: Review of Resident #33's medical record revealed he was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including epilepsy, developmental disorder of scholastic skills and unspecified intellectual disabilities. Review of Resident #33's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed he exhibited intact cognition. Review of Resident #33's physician orders revealed an order dated 07/09/21 for Depakote delayed release 500 mg (milligrams) give two tablets by mouth two times a day related to epilepsy; an order dated 07/20/21 for Phenobarbital 30 mg give one tablet by the mouth in the morning related to epilepsy; an order dated 07/09/21 for Vimpat 200 mg give one tablet by mouth two times a day related to epilepsy; an order dated 08/05/21 to obtain a Vimpat blood level every…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIONSTONE CARE — 24 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.4+0.6 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.7-0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 23 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
LIONSTONE HZ OPCO HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 01/01/2023
KAZARNOVSKY, SOLOMONIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF50%since 01/01/2023
STEIN, ABBAIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF50%since 01/01/2023
CUSNER, ADAMIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/27/2025
DEGYANSKY, JEFFREYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2020
GOLDISH, ELIEZERIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/09/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-5.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$269K
Related-party expense4% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 23%Medicare 8%Other / private 69%

This home reported $269K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$304per resident / day
operating cost
$9,242per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$289per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365634. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next