No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Gardens Of Paulding The

199 County Road 103, Paulding, OH 45879 · For profit - Corporation · 50 certified beds · (419) 399-4940 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (419) 399-4940 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0610) — cited Sep 20251 actual-harm citation
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (57%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
9742 US Highway 127 · (419) 899-2137 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
104 N Williams St · (419) 399-9780 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1069 N Williams St · (419) 399-3751 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1040 W Wayne St · (419) 567-4206

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.6%5.3%15.4%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight9.9%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.9%0.2%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms56.2%30.1%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.4%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.3%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication37.9%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.6%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.4%21.4%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table16.7%8.8%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.4%1.2%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%75.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission36.7%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.6%12.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.121.731.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.161.801.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 29 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

57.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
13.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.84U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.39hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.32hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.84 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 95% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF57.5%CMS range 39.9–71.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF13.0%CMS range 7.6–19.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.061.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.64
RN hours/ resident / day
1.05
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.59
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.28
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.52
RN hoursweekends
56.9%
Total nursing turnover
45.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 38.4 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.28 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.59 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.88 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.44 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-09-11)
14
at the previous standard inspection (2023-04-24)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2023-04-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, family and staff interviews, observations, review of hospital records and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #35 was properly monitored and interventions were applied to address constipation. This resulted in actual harm when Resident #35 went multiple days with no recorded bowel movements, went to the local hospital emergency room (ER) and was subsequently admitted to the hospital for a small bowel obstruction. This affected one resident (#35) of three residents reviewed for constipation. The facility also failed to ensure an order for a wound dressing treatment was in place prior to the application of wound dressing. This affected one resident (#11) of four residents reviewed for skin conditions. The Facility census was 39. Findings Include: 1. Review of Resident #35's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/26/23. Diagnoses included, but not limited to, epilepsy, dysphagia, cerebral palsy, mild intellectual disabilities, and autistic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of a cleaning checklist, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was properly cleaned and maintained in a sanitary manner, and failed to ensure food items were stored in a manner to prevent contamination. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 39 residents who received food prepared in the kitchen. The facility census was 39.Findings include:Observation on 05/20/25 at 8:40 A.M. revealed food debris, small pieces of paper and paper towel, and dirt accumulation at the entryway of the kitchen. Further observation of the kitchen revealed the interior of the microwave contained an unknown splattered yellow substance. The gas stove had loose charred substances in the corners of the burners along with rice-like debris scattered around the burner surfaces. The stand up refrigerator contained an unknown dried substance with visible streaking at the bottom of the unit and the exterior door had multiple unidentified splatters. Continued observation revealed the dry storage area contained multiple broken orange…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff and Poison Control Center Representative interviews, and review of a Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS), the facility failed to ensure medications were appropriately secured/stored resulting in a cognitively impaired resident ingesting an undetermined amount of antifungal powder. This affected one (#10) of three residents reviewed for medication storage. The facility census was 38. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #10 revealed admission date of 06/16/25. The resident was admitted to the facility under hospice with diagnoses including hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, dementia without behaviors and cerebral atherosclerosis. The resident remained in the facility. Review of Resident #10's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed she had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of three out of 15 indicating significantly impaired cognition. Resident #10 required supervision for eating, bed mobility,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, review of facility policy, and review of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines, the facility failed to label refrigerated foods and practice proper hand hygiene during food service. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 39. Findings include: 1. Observation on 09/08/25 at 8:20 A.M. of the walk-in refrigerator revealed the following food items not labeled or dated: a gallon size plastic bag of sliced cheddar cheese, bag of bologna, and container of coleslaw. Interview on 09/08/25 at 8:28 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #217 verified the three food items in the walk-in refrigerator were unlabeled and undated.Review of the facility policy titled, Food Storage, dated 2023, revealed leftover food should be stored in covered containers or wrapped carefully and securely and clearly labeled and dated before being refrigerated. 2. Observation on 09/10/25 at 10:40 A.M. revealed [NAME] #207 was pureeing the lunch meal. [NAME] #207 was observed to have fingernails painted with a thick layer of polish. While…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interview, review of the facility submitted Self-Reported Incident (SRI), review of the facility investigation, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a complete and thorough investigation of alleged resident abuse. This affected one (#17) of four residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 39. Findings include:Review of Resident #17's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/30/25. Diagnoses included depression, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, aneurysm of artery of lower extremity, hypothyroidism, and anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #17's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #17 had intact cognition. Review of Resident #17's care plan dated 07/30/25 revealed Resident #17 had an alteration in skin related to an abscess to her right groin with interventions to administer medications as ordered, administer treatments as ordered, and monitor for effectiveness. Interview on 09/08/25 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident representative interview, medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents who were dependent for care received assistance with shaving. This affected one (#41) of two residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). The facility census was 39.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #41 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of early onset cerebellar ataxia, physical debility and vascular dementia.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/20/25, revealed Resident #41 was cognitively intact and required supervision/touching assistance with personal hygiene.Review of care plan dated 08/06/25 revealed Resident #41 had a ADLs self-care deficit. Interventions included supervision with personal hygiene.Review of the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) personal hygiene task charting for the past 30 days revealed Resident #41 was marked as dependent 18 times, marked as requiring…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place. This affected one (#10) of one residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 39. Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #10 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), dementia, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, essential hypertension, Type II diabetes with diabetic polyneuropathy, major depressive disorder, and carpal tunnel syndrome.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/25/25, revealed Resident #10 was cognitively intact and had no falls since admission. Review of the care plan, updated 09/08/25, revealed Resident #10 was at risk for falls. Interventions included non-slip strips in front of the shower (initiated on 08/29/25). Review of the unwitnessed fall documentation, dated 08/29/25, revealed Resident #10 had slipped on a towel on the bathroom floor.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure recommended nutritional supplements were implemented. This affected one (#4) of three residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 39. Findings include:Review of Resident #4's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/10/25. Diagnoses included dementia, muscle weakness, depression, altered mental status, and Type II diabetes mellitus. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/14/25, revealed Resident #4 had severe cognitive impairment. Review of the care plan, dated 04/10/25, revealed Resident #4 had a nutritional problem or was at risk for potential nutrition impairment/dehydration related to his diagnoses. Interventions in place included to provide and serve dietary supplements as ordered, monitor intake and record each meal, and a registered dietitian (RD) should evaluate and make diet change recommendations as needed. Review of a Nutritional Assessment, dated 07/15/25, revealed the RD recommended a trial of magic cup (nutritional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate resident medical records. This affected one (#10) of two residents residents reviewed for accurate medical records. The facility census was 39.Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #10 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), dementia, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, essential hypertension, Type II diabetes with diabetic polyneuropathy, major depressive disorder, and carpal tunnel syndrome. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/25/25, revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of a physician order, dated 11/13/24, revealed an order for insulin lispro subcutaneous solution pen-injector 100 unit/milliliters (ml), inject 10 units subcutaneously before meals related to Type II diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy., hold if (blood sugar [BS]) was less than 150. Review of the Medication Administration Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, policy review, and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, the facility failed to ensure appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was donned prior to providing care for a resident who required Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). This affected one (#17) of one resident reviewed for EBP. The facility census was 39. Findings include:Review of Resident #17's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/30/25. Diagnoses included depression, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, aneurysm of artery of lower extremity, hypothyroidism, and anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #17's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #17 had intact cognition.Review of Resident #17's care plan dated 07/30/25 revealed Resident #17 had an alteration in skin related to an abscess to her right groin with interventions to administer medications as ordered, administer treatments as ordered, and monitor for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, observation, and policy review, the facility failed to follow infection control policy and procedures when providing incontinence cares. This affected one (#7) out of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 43. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 08/10/22 with medical diagnoses of congestive heart failure, diabetes mellitus, obesity, hypertension, and atrial fibrillation. Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], which indicated Resident #7 had moderate cognitive impairment and was dependent upon staff for toilet hygiene, bathing, and transfers. The MDS also indicated Resident #7 was frequently incontinent of bladder and bowel. Observation on 03/05/24 at 10:24 A.M. revealed Registered Nurse (RN) #241 provided incontinence care to Resident #7. RN #241 washed her hands and applied gloves prior to initiating incontinence…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 21 citations
  • Potential for harm · F2024-02-07 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — widespread
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, and review of the policy, the facility failed to maintain a functioning call light system to alert staff of a resident's need. This had the potential to affect all 35 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 35. Findings include: Observations on 02/07/24 at 8:24 A.M., revealed call lights flashing in the hallway. Observation of the nurse station, where the call light board is located, revealed no sound could be heard but three red lights were flashing, indicating the call light had been activated. Interview on 03/07/24 at 8:27 A.M., with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) # 102 verified the three red flashing lights indicated residents needed assistance and verified no sound was coming from the panel. LPN #102 stated room [ROOM NUMBER]'s panel was not working, and those residents had bells to alert staff of needs. The panel in room [ROOM NUMBER] could not be reset. Interview on 02/07/24 at 1:45 P.M., with Maintenance Man #132 revealed he had no knowledge the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an incontinent resident was provided with resident specific and timely incontinence assistance. This affected one (#3) of three residents reviewed for the provision of incontinence care and The facility census was 34. Findings include: Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/24/23, with the diagnoses including: cerebral palsy, seizure disorder, autistic disorder, mild intellectual disability, anemia, abscess of prostate, dysphagia, and sepsis. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] assessed Resident #3 with severe cognitive impairment, unable to make needs known, dependent on staff for the completion of activities of daily living including toileting, and incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of the nursing plan of care was initiated on 07/30/23, to address Resident #3 risk for decline in activity of daily living function and/or participation as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website, and policy review, the facility failed to implement proper shut the doors to the rooms and post signage outside the door for residents with droplet isolation precautions. This affected three (#2, #14, and #42) out of the three residents reviewed for droplet isolation precautions. The facility had 16 residents with droplet isolation precautions. The facility census was 39. 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 07/20/23. Diagnoses included atrioventricular block, malignant neoplasm of the prostate, and COVID-19. Review of the infection progress note, dated 07/30/23 at 1:50 P.M., stated Resident #14 tested positive for COVID-19. Review of the care plan for Resident #14 revealed an actual infection related to COVID-19 care plan, dated 07/31/23, with an intervention for contact/droplet precautions due to COVID-19. Review of the physician orders for Resident #14 revealed a physician order, dated 07/31/23, for single room contact/droplet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident interview, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents who required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), received adequate and timely care to maintain good personal hygiene including shaving and nail care and timely repositioning. This affected four residents (#4, #26, #9, and #190) of five residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility census was 39. Findings Include: 1. Review of Resident #4's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/21/21. Diagnoses included history of Coronavirus (COVID-19), need for assistance with personal care, cognitive communication deficit, major depressive disorder, and bipolar disorder. Review of Resident #4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating Resident #4 was cognitively intact. Resident #4 required extensive assistance with bed mobility, and dressing. Resident #4 was totally dependent on staff for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Observation on 04/18/23 from 8:01 A.M. to 8:12 A.M. of breakfast trays being delivered to the resident's room, revealed State Tested Nursing Assistants (STNAs) (#341 and #344) were noted to touch personal items of residents as well as the residents while delivering the breakfast trays. Continued observations revealed neither STNA performed any hand hygiene after assisting the residents and before delivering the next breakfast tray. Interview on 04/18/23 at 8:13 A.M. with STNAs (#341 and #344) verified they did not perform the appropriate hand hygiene between the resident's trays being delivered. 3. Review of the medical record for resident #9 revealed an admission date of 03/22/17 with a diagnosis of hemiplegia and hemiparesis. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #9 had impaired cognition and required limited assistance of one staff for eating. Observations of the dining room on 04/20/23 at 12:00 P.M., revealed Resident #9 sitting at the assistance table with two other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents who required assistance with eating were provided with a dignified dining experience. This affected one resident (#26) of one resident observed in the dining room who required assistance with eating. There were twelve residents in the dining room. In addition, the facility failed to ensure residents in the dining room received meals timely in relation to other residents. This affected one resident (#90) of eleven residents observed to be eating in the dining room. The facility census was 39. Findings Include: 1. Review of Resident #26's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/21/21. Diagnoses included dysphagia, cerebrovascular disease, speech and language deficit, need for assistance with personal care, cerebral palsy, epilepsy, and aphasia. Review of Resident #26's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was not able to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, resident interview, staff interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident's physician was notified of changes in skin conditions. This affected one resident (#11) of the three residents reviewed for notifications. The facility also failed to ensure the physician was notified when a resident's blood sample for testing was not able to be completed. This affected one resident (#17) of the three-residents reviewed for notification. The Facility census was 39. 1. Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/02/20. Diagnoses included type II diabetes, urinary incontinence, uterine cancer, dysphagia, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, epilepsy, and obesity. Review of Resident #11's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating Resident #11 was cognitively intact. Resident #11 had moisture associated skin damage (MASD) at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident's rooms were maintained in a clean and homelike manner. This affected one resident (#13) of 39 residents reviewed for their environment. The facility census was 39. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 11/05/14 with diagnoses of anxiety and depression. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/04/23, revealed Resident #13 had intact cognition and mobilized independently. Observation on 04/18/23 at 9:04 A.M. of Resident #13's room, revealed an unfinished, white drywall patch on the yellow wall behind his recliner chair. The patch was dented in, and the dust came off and onto the side of Resident #13's recliner chair. Further observation revealed 7 to 10 colored plastic pieces of holiday grass on the floor around Resident #13's room. Interview with Resident #13 at the same time, revealed the resident did not like the unpainted drywall patch behind his recliner. Interview on 04/18/23 at approximately…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-24 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure resident's baseline care plans were accurate and complete. This affected two residents (#91 and #190) of three reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility census was 39. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record of Resident #91 revealed an admission date of 04/12/23. Diagnoses included type II diabetes mellitus, essential hypertension, migraine without aura, hyperlipidemia, hereditary and idiopathic neuropathy. Diagnoses added on 04/19/23 included localized edema, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, and metabolic syndrome. Review of the Baseline Care Plan dated 04/12/23 revealed mental health needs related to bipolar; however, there were no interventions documented for the diagnosis. The form indicated the skin was intact and a pressure reducing mattress would be utilized. Medications included antipsychotics and antidepressants without documenting specific ones. The form did not indicate the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, review of the medical record, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were individualized for each resident. This affected two residents (#22 and #34) of 14 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The Facility census was 39. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 09/22/20 with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease and insomnia. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #22 had impaired cognition. Review of the comprehensive care plan for Resident #22 revealed a care area initiated 02/08/23 indicating Resident #22 received an antidepressant medication (Trazodone) for insomnia and was at risk for having side effects or an adverse reaction. Review of all discontinued, completed, and current physician orders for Resident #22 revealed she had no orders for Trazodone. Interview on 04/20/23 at 9:23 A.M. with the MDS Coordinator #333…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide pressure ulcer care for residents. This affected one resident (#91) of two reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 39. Findings include: Review of the medical record of Resident #91 revealed an admission date of 04/12/23. Diagnoses include type II diabetes mellitus, essential hypertension, migraine without aura, hyperlipidemia, hereditary and idiopathic neuropathy, localized edema, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, and metabolic syndrome. Review of the admission assessment dated [DATE] at 10:35 P.M., revealed the presence of a stage II pressure ulcer measuring 5 centimeters (cm) in length, 3 cm in length and no depth on the left buttock. Review of the active April 2023 physician's orders for Resident #91, revealed no active treatment orders for the resident's stage II pressure wound on the left buttock. Observation on 04/19/23 at 9:45 A.M. with Assistant Director of Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-24 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure fluids were monitored for residents. This affected one resident (#17) of one resident reviewed for dialysis. The facility census was 39. Findings include: Review of the medical record of Resident #17 revealed the most recent admission date of 03/07/23. The initial admission date was 03/24/22. Diagnoses include hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease with heart failure, end stage renal disease with dependence on renal dialysis, anxiety disorder, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, diabetes, major depressive disorder. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #17, revealed the resident had minimal cognition deficit. The assessment revealed to the resident she had a diagnosis of end stage renal disease and received dialysis. Review of the nutritional care plan dated 04/05/22 revealed the facility was to provide a fluid restriction as ordered. The care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-24 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a physician ordered abdominal binder was applied to secure a resident's feeding tube. This affected one resident (#35) of one reviewed for tube feeding. The facility identified two residents who received tube feeding. The facility census was 39. Findings Include: Review of Resident #35's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/26/23. Diagnoses included epilepsy, dysphagia, cerebral palsy, mild intellectual disabilities, and autistic disorder. Review of Resident #35's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], and 03/14/23 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was not assessed. Review of Resident #35's 03/14/23 MDS revealed he required limited assistance with bed mobility, and extensive assistance for transfer. Resident #35 was totally dependent on staff for dressing, eating, toileting, and personal hygiene. Assessment revealed Resident #35 had an abdominal feeding tube and received 25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-24 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) was maintained appropriately. This affected one resident (#29) of one resident reviewed for intravenous (IV) therapy services. The facility census was 39. Findings include: Review of the medical record of Resident #29 revealed an admission date of 04/06/22. Diagnoses included, but not limited to, osteomyelitis of sacral and sacrococcygeal lumbar region, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, personal history of transient ischemic attack and cerebral infarction without residual deficits, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, and essential hypertension. Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #29 was cognitively intact and required total assistance for all care. The assessment indicated the resident had received IV medications in the facility. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-24 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician responded in a timely manner to the pharmacist's recommendation during a monthly medication review. This affected one resident (#13) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 39. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 11/05/14 with diagnoses of anxiety and depression. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/04/23, revealed Resident #13 had intact cognition. Review of a facility document titled Physician Recommendation Form dated 09/01/22, revealed a recommendation from the pharmacist to the provider to review the necessity to continue use of buspirone (an anti-anxiety medication) and the necessity to continue use of sertraline (an antidepressant) for Resident #13. Further review revealed the provider responded on 11/20/22 and determined Resident #13 should remain on the medications. Interview on 04/20/23 at 12:40 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the response…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-24 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents prescribed medications had appropriate indications for their use. This affected one resident (#91) of five reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 39. Findings include: Review of the medical record of Resident #91 revealed an admission date of 04/12/23. Diagnoses included type II diabetes mellitus, essential hypertension, migraine without aura, hyperlipidemia, hereditary and idiopathic neuropathy. Diagnoses were added on 04/19/23 which included localized edema, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, and metabolic syndrome. Review of the physician orders dated 04/12/23 for Resident #91, revealed an order for Aripiprazole (antipsychotic) five milligrams (mgs) by mouth one time daily for health maintenance. An order for Duloxetine hydrochloride (anti-depressant) capsule 60 mg, give two capsules by mouth once daily for health maintenance. An order for Hydroxyzine (antihistamine) 25 mg by mouth twice a day for health maintenance. An order for Furosemide (diuretic) 40 mg by mouth…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-12-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, review of the kitchen cleaning schedule, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain a clean kitchen. This affected 40 of 40 residents who receive food from the kitchen. Findings include: Observation of the kitchen on 12/17/19 at 10:44 A.M. revealed a heavy amount of dust like particles near the food preparation surfaces. A stand alone refrigerator placed next to two kitchen surface areas had a heavy amount of dust like particles on the back, top, and vent of the refrigerator. Between the stand alone refrigerator and the kitchen surface area, there were electrical outlets and wiring enclosed in metal from the outlet to the ceiling were observed to have a heavy amount of dust like particles. Dietary staff were prepping lunch for the residents on the surfaces near the heavily dusted areas. Interview on 12/17/19 10:46 A.M. with Dietary Manager #175 verified the outside of the refrigerator, outlet, and metal tubing has not been cleaned for a long time and the amount of dust was unacceptable. Review of the facility cleaning…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-12-18 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide a hoyer lift to accommodate the resident's needs. This affected one resident (#25) of one resident review for accommodation of needs. The facility census was 40. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #25 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included diabetes mellitus type II, difficulty walking, muscle weakness, restless leg syndrome and a body mass index of 70 or greater. Review of the care plan, created on 03/08/19, revealed the resident had mobility limitations including not ambulating, impaired standing balance, and use of upper side rails as an enabler to assist with mobilization in bed. An intervention in the care plan included to a two person assist and the use of a mechanical lift for transfers in and out of bed daily, as needed. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 10/03/19, revealed the resident had no cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-12-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of facility policy, observation and staff and resident interview, the facility failed to provide invitations to care conferences to two residents (#10 and #25). Additionally, the facility failed to update a resident's plan of care with for one resident (#1). This affected three residents (Resident #1, #10 and #25) of twelve residents who had care plans reviewed. The facility census was 40. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, delusional disorder, depressions, anxiety and restless leg syndrome. Review of the admission information revealed a note from 04/16/19 of Resident #1 residing in the Assisted living area and was found outside the building as well as a history of falls. Review of a plan of care, dated 06/21/19, revealed mobility, activities of daily living and fall risks were identified as issues. The plan of care did not include the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-12-18 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of facility policy and staff interview, the facility failed to obtain an ordered laboratory test timely for one resident. This affected one (Resident #34) of 12 residents reviewed during the annual survey for laboratory tests. The facility identified 23 residents who had orders for laboratory tests in the last 90 days. The facility census was 40. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #34 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included sepsis, hematuria (bloody urine), Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) (drug resistant infection), and an acquired absence of bilateral legs above the knees. Review of the physician orders, dated 12/10/19, revealed the resident was in contact isolation due to MRSA in a rectal perineal wound. It further revealed the resident was to have the the rectal perineal area swabbed to check for the presence of MRSA. Review of a Treatment Administration Record,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-12-18 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interview, record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents received dental services. This affected one resident (#25) of one resident review for ancillary services. The facility census was 40. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #25 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included diabetes mellitus type II, hypoglycemia and muscle weakness. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 10/03/19, revealed the resident had no cognitive issues, abnormal behaviors, or rejection of care. Review of the care plan, created on 03/08/19, verified the resident has potential for dental/oral cavity deficits related to having broken teeth and the resident has a history of tooth abscess. The care plan interventions included coordinating arrangements for dental care, and transportation as needed/as ordered. Review of a dental note, dated 07/29/19, revealed Resident #25 was complaining of a lower right tooth…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIONSTONE CARE — 24 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.7+0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 54.4-1.4 vs chain
The other 23 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
LIONSTONE HZ OPCO HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 01/01/2023
KAZARNOVSKY, SOLOMONIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF50%since 01/01/2023
STEIN, ABBAIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF50%since 01/01/2023
CUSNER, ADAMIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/27/2025
DEGYANSKY, JEFFREYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2020
GOLDISH, ELIEZERIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/09/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$3.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-24.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$122K
Related-party expense3% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 59%Medicare 9%Other / private 32%

This home reported $122K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$361per resident / day
operating cost
$10,983per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$290per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366044. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next