No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Columbus Alzheimer's Care Ctr

700 Jasonway Avenue, Columbus, OH 43214 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (614) 459-7050 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (614) 459-7050 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Mar 2025Resident-funds citation (F0567)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 actual-harm citations$26,685 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (35% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (35) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $26,685 in federal fines (most recent 2025-03-10)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
4775 Knightsbridge Blvd Ste 103 · (614) 442-2200 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
4830 Knightsbridge Blvd Ste C · (877) 360-2801 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
749 Bethel Rd · (614) 559-3877 · Call to confirm hours
Park
High St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.3%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.0%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms99.7%30.1%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%3.2%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.3%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication26.8%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.1%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.0%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control19.7%21.4%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table6.1%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine22.7%75.6%79.4%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.781.731.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.561.801.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.34U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.15hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 56% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.61
RN hours/ resident / day
0.46
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.04
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.10
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.51
RN hoursweekends
35.2%
Total nursing turnover
25.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 96.2 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.10 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.61 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.04 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.88 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.19 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.65 to 0.51 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

17
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-08-27)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2022-02-22)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

35 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2025-03-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the facility Self-Reported Incidents (SRI), review of the facility investigation, review of facility policy and procedure, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #100 was free from resident to resident physical abuse. Actual harm occurred on 02/03/25 when Resident #57, who had a history of resident altercations and impaired cognition, pushed Resident #100 causing a fall and a right femur fracture. This affected one (Resident #100) of six residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 98. Findings include: a. Review of a facility submitted SRI dated 02/03/25 for physical abuse revealed Resident #57 pushed Resident #100 to the ground when Resident #100 wandered into Resident #57's room. Both residents were assessed for injuries. Resident #100 was left immobilized on the floor due to an obvious range of motion deficit to the right hip. Nine-one-one (911) was called for Resident #100's pain and range of motion deficit. Neurological…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of a facility submitted Self-Reported Incident (SRI), hospital record review, interviews with staff, review of incident reports, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure care was delivered, as assessed and care planned for, utilizing the appropriate number of staff assistance during the provision of care for Resident #10. This resulted in actual harm when Resident #10 was provided care by one facility Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #100, who repositioned and provided incontinence care on 03/27/25 at approximately 10:00 A.M. and when Resident #10 was provided a bed bath and hair care on 03/27/25 at approximately 2:45 P.M. by one Hospice Aide #115 resulting in a comminuted femur fracture, a fracture where the bone breaks into three of more pieces often the result of major impact injury. Resident #10 was noted to have bruising to the right leg by the hospice aide (#115) on 03/27/25 when the aide was providing care alone to the resident. Resident #10 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, review of self-reported incident investigations (SRI) and policy review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse, neglect, misappropriation and injuries of unknown origin were thoroughly investigated and interventions put in place. This affected eight Residents (#20, #21, #33, #48, #52, #54, #89 and #100) of nine reviewed for abuse, neglect and misappropriation investigations. The facility census was 96. Findings include 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #54 revealed an admission date of 10/18/24. Diagnoses included multiple rib fractures, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, aphasia, diabetes, depression, osteoporosis and restlessness. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #54 was cognitively impaired with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 05 and required substantial assistance for showering bathing and dressing Review of SRI 252935 regarding an injury of unknown origin for Resident #54 dated 10/12/24 revealed no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, resident interview, family interview, review of the self-reported misappropriation incident investigation and review of the abuse policy, facility failed to ensure allegations of misappropriation were reported to the state agency in a timely manner. This affected one (Resident #89) of one reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 96. Findings include Review of the medical record for Resident #89 revealed an admission date of 09/06/24. Diagnoses included unspecified dementia, aphasia, vascular disease, diabetes, epilepsy, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #89 was cognitively impaired with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 03 and required extensive assistance for bed mobility and transfers, partial/moderate assist for bathing and dressing, and substantial maximum assistance for personal hygiene. Review of the plan of care dated 12/30/24 revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure call lights were in reach and accessible for resident use. This affected two residents (#35 and #54) of two observed laying in their bed in their rooms. Facility census was 96. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #35 revealed an admission date of 11/21/24. Diagnoses included dementia, osteoarthritis, aphasia, and anxiety. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #35 was cognitively impaired with a BIMS of 99 (unable to determine due to lack of responses in answering) and required extensive assistance of two staff members for bed mobility and extensive assistance of one staff member for transfers. Observation and interview on 01/14/25 at 9:35 A.M. revealed Resident #35's call light was not within reach. It was hung back behind the headboard over the clock hanging on the wall about 6 feet from the ground. Registered Nurse (RN) #53 confirmed the call light was hung up over the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-27 · tag F0680 — widespread
    Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on personnel file review, staff interview and review of a job description, the facility failed to ensure a qualified Activity Director (AD) was in place to oversee the facility's overall activity services. This had the potential to affect all 99 resident residing in the facility. The census was 99. Findings include: Review of personnel files on 08/21/24 at 1:20 P.M. revealed Activities Director (AD) #608 was hired as activities aid 10/30/22 part-time. Staff #608 had a high school diploma and had attended some collage studying social work but did not graduate. Staff #608 resigned her part-time position 01/19/23 and became employed on an as needed or PRN basis. A new application to be activities aid full-time was submitted on 09/26/23 and human resources documents indicate this is when Staff #608 became a full-time activities assistant. Staff #608 was promoted to Activities Manager 04/05/2024. Interview on 08/20/24 at 03:26 P.M. with AD #608 confirmed she is not certified yet. AD #608 stated she has worked here for three years as activity assistant; 5 months as director. AD #608…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, policy review, and review of manufacturer's guidelines, the facility failed to ensure medications were labeled and stored appropriately per manufacturer's guidelines and failed to ensure medication carts were secured when not in use. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 99 residents. Findings include: 1.Observation on 08/21/24 at 8:52 A.M. revealed Registered Nurse (RN) #190 was at her medication cart preparing medications on the 300 unit. RN #190 had a cup of crushed medications mixed with applesauce in her hand. RN #190 turned her back to the medication cart and walked approximately 30 feet to the center of the dining room and did not lock her medication cart. RN #190 returned to the cart approximately one minute later. Interview on 08/21/23 at 8:54 A.M. with RN #190 confirmed she had left her medication unlocked and unattended. Observation on 08/21/24 at 2:19 P.M. revealed RN #120 at her medication cart in the Pink hall of the skilled unit. RN #120 had a cup…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to prevent clean equipment and utensils from contamination, failed to maintain kitchen equipment in operating condition, and failed to follow proper datemarking procedures. This had the potential to affect all residents with the exception of Residents #26 and #90 who receive nothing by mouth. The facility census was 99 residents. Findings include: 1. Observation on 08/19/24 at 04:18 P.M. revealed there was a rectangular door on the ceiling above a storage rack for clean pots and pans with chipped paint on the door and all around the door frame. Interview on 08/19/24 at 04:18 P.M. with Dietary Director (DD) #570 confirmed the clean pots and pans were stored underneath the ceiling door to the attic access and the chipping paint could fall on the clean pots and pans. Review of the facility policy titled Cross Contamination Overview dated August 2008 revealed physical contaminants included foreign objects that might inadvertently enter the food. 2. Observation on 08/19/24 at 04:33 P.M. in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-27 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility document review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the facility assessment contained all required information. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 99. Findings include: Review of the facility assessment updated 08/19/24 revealed the assessment was completed using a facility assessment tool which provided guidelines and prompts for completing a comprehensive assessment. The section prompting the facility to describe ethnic, cultural, or religious factors or personal resident preferences that could affect the care provided to the residents was blank. The section prompting the facility to list contracts, memoranda of understanding, or other agreements with third parties to provide services or equipment to the facility during both normal operations and emergencies, such as transfer agreements, was blank. The section prompting the facility to list their health information technology resources for electronically managing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment for seven (#18, #26, #35, #44, #78, #90, and #92) residents, all residents were screened during the annual survey. The facility census was 99. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #44's medical record identified admission to the facility occurred on 07/18/17 with medical diagnosis including aphasia, Alzheimer's disease, and dementia. Observation on 08/19/24 at 3:47 P.M. of Resident #44's room revealed the room was filthy, the floor was sticky causing feet to stick to the floor. The bedspread was visibly soiled and the wall behind the bed was stained with residue. Observation on 08/22/24 at 10:31 A.M. with Maintenance Director #801 and Housekeeping Supervisor #615 of Resident #44's room revealed the floor was very sticky and there were brown and yellow stains on the wall next to Resident #44's bed. Interview on 08/22/24 at 10:31 A.M. with Maintenance Director #801 verified the floor was sticky. Interview on 08/22/24 at 10:31 A.M. with Housekeeping Supervisor #615…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-27 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, policy review, and review of manufacturer's guidelines, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate did not exceed five percent (%). The facility had four medication errors of 31 opportunities for an error rate of 12.9 %. This affected four (Residents #64, #27, #08, and #49) of five residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 99 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #64 revealed an admission date of 05/08/23 with diagnoses including dementia, type two diabetes mellitus, paranoid schizophrenia, and hypertension. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #64 dated 07/23/24 revealed the resident had intact cognition. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #64 revealed an order dated 09/01/23 for Namenda 10 milligram (mg) one tablet by mouth twice daily. Observation on 08/21/24 at 8:38 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #470 prepared Resident #64's morning medications for administration. Namenda was not available…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview and review of the facility policy review, the facility failed ensure residents with physician's orders for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) had appropriate signage outside the room indicating the precautions and failed to ensure containers of appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) was available outside the residents' rooms. This affected three (Residents #1, #38, and #72) of 10 facility-identified residents with physician's orders for EBP. The facility also failed to ensure staff performed proper hand hygiene and followed appropriate infection control practices during wound care. This affected one (Resident #72) of six residents reviewed for wounds. The facility failed to ensure staff discarded gloves and performed hand hygiene after providing care. This affected two (Residents #1 and #34) of 25 residents sampled. The facility also failed to ensure staff donned gloves prior to insulin administration. This affected one (Resident #49) of eight facility-identified residents with orders for insulin. The facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 23 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-27 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, family interview, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to make a life insurance policy payment from a facility managed account for one resident (Resident #9) out of five residents reviewed for personal funds. The facility census was 99. Findings include: Review of Resident #9's record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia, age-related osteoporosis, psoriasis, dysphagia, aphasia, Alzheimer's disease, history of other mental and behavioral disorders. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #9 was not interviewed for cognition because she was rarely or never understood. Resident #9 had poor short term and long-term memory and was unable to make daily care decisions on her own. Resident #9 displayed physical behaviors four to six days during the look back period. Resident #9 was unable to be interviewed for the resident screening process. Interview on 08/19/24 at 1:03 P.M. via…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the failed to ensure staff notified resident physicians of abnormal lab results in a timely manner. This affected one (Resident #72) of 25 residents sampled. The facility census was 99 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #72 revealed an admission date of 09/02/21 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, venous insufficiency, open wound of the left lower leg, generalized anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder. Review of the MDS assessment for Resident #72 dated 07/18/24 revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #72 revealed an order dated 08/21/24 to obtain a culture to the wound on the resident's left lower extremity. Review of the wound culture results for Resident #72 revealed the wound culture was obtained on 08/21/24 and the results were received on 08/24/24 at 2:06 P.M. indicating the wound was infected with a heavy growth of streptococcus pyogenes (bacteria) which was susceptible to penicillin and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-27 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, policy review, and review of the facility assessment, the facility failed to effectively communicate with Resident #34. This affected one (Resident #34) of two residents reviewed for communication. The facility identified four residents who spoke an alternate language. The facility also failed to provide necessary assistance to maintain personal hygiene for one (Resident #35) of 25 reviewed. The facility census was 99. Findings include: Review of Resident #34's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/04/17. Medical diagnoses included dementia, depression, aphasia (difficulty forming words or speaking) and cerebrovascular accident (stroke). Review of Resident #34's minimum data set (MDS) 3.0 annual assessment, dated 07/01/24 revealed the resident's preferred language was French Creole. The resident was identified to not want the use of an interpreter. Resident #34 was recorded as rarely/never understanding others, and rarely/never was able to make…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-27 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide activities to meet the needs and preferences of the residents. This affected three (Resident #27, #45, and #72) of 32 residents observed for activities. The Census was 99 Findings Include: 1. Review of Resident #27's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/14/23. Medical diagnoses included dementia, depression, osteoarthritis, and hypertension. Review of Resident #27's MDS Medicare/5-day assessment, dated 07/02/24, revealed the resident had a BIMS score of 11, indicating moderately impaired cognition. Review of Resident #27's Activity Assessment, dated 02/06/2, revealed the resident's former occupation was a carpenter and he had current interests in reading, music, spiritual/religious activities, and watching television and movies. The assessment indicated it was somewhat important to Resident #27 to listen to music he liked, be around animals such as pets, to do his favorite activities, to go outside to get…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to follow physicians orders in obtaining daily weights. This affected one (Resident #4) of 25 residents records reviewed. The census was 99. Findings include: Review of Resident #4's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease with agitation, congestive heart failure (CHF), Psychotic disorder with delusions and paranoid schizophrenia. Review of the significant change minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] revealed her cognition was not intact. Review of the physicians orders revealed an order on 07/18/24 weigh daily at 6:00 A.M. notify if weight gain is three pounds in a day or five pounds in a week. This weight must be done every morning and charted at 6:00 A.M. by the night shift nurse. Review of the plan of care dated 07/17/24 revealed Resident #4 has need for cardiac assessment/potential for alteration in cardiac output Complete cardiac assessment, as clinically indicated,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-27 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to assist Resident #78 with applying his corrective lenses. This affected one (Resident #78) of two residents reviewed for communication-sensory. The facility census was 99. Findings include: Review of Resident #78's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/14/22. Medical diagnoses included dementia, polyneuropathy, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis (weakness and paralysis) following a cerebrovascular accident (stroke). Review of Resident #78's Minimum Data Set 3.0 quarterly assessment, dated 07/01/24 revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 03, indicating severely impaired cognition. The assessment noted the resident's vision was adequate with no corrective lenses. Resident #78 was identified as usually able to make himself understood and usually able to understand others. Review of Resident #78's care plan, initiated on 05/24/22 and revised 06/27/24, revealed the resident had a visual acuity deficit due to the aging process, he wears glasses some of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain interventions to promote healing of pressure ulcers. This had the potential to affect three (Resident #1, #18 and #90) of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The Census was 99. Findings include: Review of Resident #18's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included protein calorie malnutrition, pressure ulcer of the right ankle, open wound of the left lower leg, Alzheimer's disease, aphasia, anxiety and major depression. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed her cognition was not intact. Resident #18 had no limitation in range of motion. Resident #18 had a Stage II pressure ulcer and an open lesion other than an ulcer coded on the assessment. Resident #18 was coded as having a pressure reducing device for her chair and the bed. Review of the physician's orders revealed an order for a pressure reducing cushion to her chair…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-27 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure tube feedings were administered at the rate ordered by the physician. This affected one (Resident #26) of two facility-identified residents with orders for tube feeding. The facility census was 99 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 12/29/21 with diagnoses including dementia with agitation, dysphagia, contracture of muscles, severe protein calorie malnutrition, paranoid schizophrenia, and diabetes. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment for Resident #26 dated 05/22/24 revealed the resident was cognitively impaired. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #26 revealed an order dated 05/09/24 to administer Isosource 1.5 per gastrostomy tube via pump at 55 cubic centimeters (cc) per hour continuously. Review of the plan of care for Resident #26 dated 03/31/24 revealed the required a tube feeding related to having severe protein calorie malnutrition and dysphagia with interventions which included staff should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-27 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors related to insulin administration. This affected one (Resident #49) of five residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility identified eight residents whose medication regimens required insulin injections. The facility census was 99 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #49 revealed an admission date of 05/22/23 with diagnoses including type two diabetes and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebrovascular accident. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #49 dated 06/29/24 revealed the resident was cognitively impaired and received insulin injections. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #49 revealed an order dated 02/23/24 for Humalog insulin two units by subcutaneous injection three times daily before meals. The order specified to hold the medication if the blood glucose level was less than 140 milligram (mg)/deciliter (dl). Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-03-06 · tag F0729 — widespread
    Verify that a nurse aide has been trained; and if they haven't worked as a nurse aide for 2 years, receive retraining.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on review of personnel files, review of the Ohio Department of Health (ODH) Nurse Aide Registry, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that three State Tested Nursing Aide's (STNA) registrations were not expired. This affected three (STNA #36, #123 and #131) out of three STNA's reviewed for active registrations and had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 97. Findings include: 1. Review of the personnel file for STNA #123 revealed a hire date of [DATE]. Review of the ODH Nurse Aide Registry revealed STNA #123's registration expired on [DATE] and had a registry status of expired. The registry stated expired: we have received no work verification in the past 24 months, therefore this individual is not eligible for employment in a long term care facility. Interview on [DATE] at 11:27 A.M. with STNA #123 revealed her STNA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-02-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, policy review, and review of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidance and COVID-19 Data Tracker, the facility failed to ensure staff wore personal protective equipment (PPE) in a manner to prevent the potential spread of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). This had the potential to affect all 95 residents residing in the facility. Findings included: As of 02/14/22, the facility was in outbreak for COVID-19 infection when one employee tested positive for the virus and had taken care of six residents. 1. Observation on 02/15/22 at 4:10 P.M. revealed Housekeeping Supervisor (HS) #25 and Receptionist #67 had on masks that had ear loop straps and the masks had gaps out of the sides of the cheeks. These masks had N-95 printed on them, but no number or National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) approved. Interviews at the same time with HS #25 and Receptionist #67 verified they were not wearing the masks the facility had provided them which was an N-95 that had the straps that went on top of the head and around the neck. They…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms and facility corridors, lobby and unit hallways temperatures were between 71 to 81 degrees Fahrenheit. This affected two (Resident #30 and #31) of 25 residents reviewed for physical environment. The facility census was 95. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #30 revealed an admission dated of 01/28/21. Diagnoses included dementia, chronic atrial fibrillation, and chronic systolic heart failure. On 02/14/22 at 7:50 A.M., an interview and observation with Resident #30 revealed his room to be very cold. Resident #30 explained, it was always cold. The maintenance man has come in numerous times, but it was not fixed. The heater was blowing cold air. The heater dials were set on heat and at the highest temperature. On 02/15/22 at 9:15 A.M., an observation of Resident #30 siting in dining area drinking coffee. He said, his room was too cold to enjoy drinking his coffee. Observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-22 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident and staff interview, review of the resident council minutes, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure activities were provided for cognitively impaired residents and provided according to the activity calendar. This affected two (#36 and #41) of four residents reviewed for activities. The facility census was 95. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #36 revealed an admission date of 08/29/16. Diagnoses included unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbances, diabetes mellitus, and major depressive disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/03/22, revealed Resident #36 was severely cognitively impaired. Functional status was total dependence for bed mobility, extensive assistance for transfers and toilet use and she was supervision for eating. Review of the activities care plan, dated 01/14/22, revealed Resident #36 enjoyed music/entertainment, arts/crafts, movies, television, spirituals,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-22 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure call lights in the bathrooms were functioning properly for two of 25 bathrooms reviewed during the annual survey. The facility census was 95. Findings include: Observation of the bathrooms for room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER] on 02/14/22 from 9:51 A.M. to 9:53 A.M. revealed the cord for the call light was missing from the wall. Interview with Maintenance Supervisor (MS) #28 on 02/16/22 at 10:37 A.M. confirmed the cords for the call lights in the bathrooms of room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER] were missing. He said he checked the cords for the call lights in the bathrooms, but didn't document it.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-04-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, staff interviews and review of the facility's policies, the facility failed to ensure the storage of frozen and refrigerated foods in a manner to protect against spoilage. The facility also failed to ensure the staff washed their hands moving from dirty dishes to touching clean dishes. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the temperature of the hamburgers served at lunch, had been cooked to the appropriate temperature. This had the potential to affect all 97 residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility census was 97. Findings include: 1. On 04/22/19 between 8:25 A.M and 9:00 A.M., a tour of the kitchen was conducted with the Dietary Manager (DM) #1. Observation of the walk-in refrigerator revealed a large plastic container, covered with foil, containing an orange pureed substance. The container was dated but had no label. Observation of the walk-in freezer revealed one plastic bag with breaded meat patties with no label and open to air. Another bag containing several large pieces of light-colored meat, had no label.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-04-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow infection control procedures when treating and monitoring potentially infections skin conditions. This affected three (#41, #75 and #89) of four residents reviewed for scabies. This had the ability to affect all 97 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: 1. Record review for Resident #41 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbances, scabies, sepsis and pneumonia. Review of his Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score, dated 01/18/19, revealed it was not completed due to his inability to answer the questions. This indicated he was severely cognitively impaired. Further review of Resident #41's medical records revealed when he was discharged from the hospital on [DATE]. In review of a physician's progress note, dated 01/16/19, revealed Resident #41 was in the hospital and was diagnosed with severe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-04-25 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the medical record and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the advanced directives were accurate according to the physician's orders and/or code status sheet signed by the resident's responsible party. This affected two (#40 and #88) of 32 residents reviewed for advance directives. The facility census was 97. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #40 revealed an admission date of 09/05/19 with diagnoses including dementia with behavioral disturbance, diabetes mellitus and atrial fibrillation. Review of the advance directives, dated 09/05/19 revealed the resident's responsible party signed the resident wishes a DNRCC (do not resuscitate comfort care). Review of the current physician's orders for 04/2019 revealed a physician's order for DNR-CC-arrest - DNI (do not intubate). Interview on 04/25/19 at 9:12 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3 confirmed the advance directives signed by the resident's wife did not match the physician's orders. She agreed this needed to be clarified. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-04-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of the Institute of Safe Medication Practices and staff interview, the facility nurse failed to meet professional standards during routine medication administration when the nurse used another resident's medication when a medication was not immediately available. This affected one (#38) of five residents observed during medication pass. (Resident #38) Findings include: Observation on 04/24/19 at 8:14 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #116 prepared the medications for Resident #38. When he came to the Divalproex (anticonvulsant) 125 milligram (mg.) medication, he stated it was not available in the cart. He stated he would borrow the medication from Resident #51 and then after he was finished passing morning medications, he would get the medication from the emergency drug kit (EDK) box and return his dose. He proceeded to use Resident #51's medication to administer to Resident #38. Interview on 04/24/19 at 9:15 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 stated the nurses were not ever to borrow medications from another resident. She stated we…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident falls were thoroughly reviewed to implement relevant interventions and failed to implement fall interventions per the resident's care plan. This affected two (Resident #56 and Resident #76) of five resident reviewed for accidents. The census was 97. Findings Include: 1. Record review for Resident #56 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbances, muscle weakness, difficulty walking, postpolio syndrome, anxiety disorder, and mid-cervical disc disorder. Review of the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment, dated 02/19/19, revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #56 medical records revealed she had an unwitnessed fall on 01/28/19. She was assessed and sent to the emergency room (ER) for evaluation, which determined she had a fractured arm. In review of the fall incident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-04-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to provide routine medications for resident when a medication was not available during medication administration. This affected one (#38) of five residents observed during medication pass. The facility census was 97. Findings include: Observation on 04/24/19 at 8:14 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #116 prepared the medications for Resident #38. When he came to the Divalproex (anticonvulsant) 125 milligram (mg.) medication, he stated it was not available in the cart. He stated he would borrow the medication from Resident #51, and then after he was finished passing morning medications, he would get the medication from the emergency drug kit (EDK) box and return his dose. He proceeded to use Resident #51's medication to administer to Resident #38. Interview on 04/24/19 at 9:15 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 stated the nurses were not ever to borrow medications from another resident. She stated they have a EDK box to get medications from or if there was none available in there, the nurse should call…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-04-25 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide the appropriate diagnosis for the use of an antipsychotic medication. This affected one (Resident #51) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 97. Findings include: A medical record review for Resident #51 revealed an admission date of 01/30/18. Diagnoses included dementia with behavioral disturbance, aphasia, unspecified psychosis, conversion disorder with seizures, heart failure, major depressive disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/07/19, revealed Resident #51 had severe cognitive impairment and required limited assistance for his daily care from the staff. Review of the current physician's order set for Resident #51, dated 04/2019, revealed an order Seroquel (an antipsychotic medication) 75 milligrams (mg.) by mouth every night for insomnia. In addition, Depakote (an antipsychotic) 500 mg. by mouth at 10:00 A.M. and 2:00 P.M. and 750 mg at 10:00 P.M. for the diagnosis of wanting to leave. On 04/25/19 at 1:48 P.M., an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-25 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, staff interview and review of the policy and procedure for medication administration, the facility failed to ensure their medication error rate was less than 5% as three medication errors were noted out of 29 opportunities for a medication error rate of 10.34%. This affected three (Resident #22, #38 and #53) of five residents observed for medication administration. Findings include: 1. Observation on 04/24/19 at 8:14 A.M. of medication administration revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #116 prepared medications for Resident #38. The medications were prepared and taken to the room of Resident #38. The resident was standing at the bathroom door at the time the nurse entered the room. He handed the resident his medications and the resident placed the medications in his mouth from the medication cup, dropping one on the floor. The nurse picked up the dropped pill and disposed of it. He then went on to pass medications to the next resident. The nurse was not observed identifying the pill prior to disposing of it. The nurse did not bring a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-08-27 · tag F0843 — widespread
    Have an agreement with at least one or more hospitals certified by Medicare or Medicaid to make sure residents can be moved quickly to the hospital when they need medical care.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documents and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure transfer agreements were in place. This had the potential to affect all residents who reside in the facility. The facility census was 99 resident. Findings include: Review of the facility document titled 2024 Tabletop Disaster Drill dated 05/24/24 revealed the facility had two sister facilities within their geographical region. Review of the transfer agreement dated 08/26/24 revealed the facility made an agreement to transfer residents to the two sister facilities in the event of an emergency. Interview on 08/26/24 at 04:55 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the facility did not execute a written transfer agreement until 08/26/24. Interview on 08/27/24 at 2:38 P.M. with the Administrator confirmed the facility did not have a transfer agreement in place prior to 08/26/24.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$26,685 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $26,685 — penalty dated 2025-03-10
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-04-02 for 13 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIONSTONE CARE — 24 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 51.7+1.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 23 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
LIONSTONE HZ OPCO HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 01/01/2023
KAZARNOVSKY, SOLOMONIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF50%since 01/01/2023
STEIN, ABBAIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF50%since 01/01/2023
CUSNER, ADAMIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/27/2025
DEGYANSKY, JEFFREYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2020
GOLDISH, ELIEZERIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/09/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+13.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$418K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 19%Medicare 1%Other / private 79%

This home reported $418K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$229per resident / day
operating cost
$6,974per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$264per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365839. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-08-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next