No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

East Park Care Center

8 East Park Circle, Brook Park, OH 44142 · For profit - Corporation · 57 certified beds · (216) 267-7229 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (216) 267-7229 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0607, F0609, F0610) — most recent Oct 2025Resident-funds citation (F0569)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 actual-harm citations1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$84,417 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (44) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $84,417 in federal fines (most recent 2025-10-14)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (72%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
6879A Southland Dr · (440) 771-1160 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
6869 Southland Dr · (440) 885-3019 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Aldi0.8 mi
6820 Pearl Rd · (855) 955-2534 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Zaremba Dr · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
6475 Fairweather Dr · (216) 267-8115

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.8%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.1%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.6%0.2%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms81.8%30.1%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.1%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.8%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication19.4%25.5%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine48.9%94.5%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.6%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control27.7%21.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table5.6%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.1%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine20.3%75.6%79.4%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 34 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

46.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.83U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.35hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.29hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.20hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.83 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 95% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF46.5%CMS range 28.8–57.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.4%CMS range 7.7–18.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay4.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.271.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.34
RN hours/ resident / day
1.01
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.73
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.08
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.25
RN hoursweekends
72.1%
Total nursing turnover
87.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 57 beds and averages 50.0 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.08 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.73 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.80 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.19 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.37 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 72% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

18
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-10-28)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2022-05-05)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

44 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-10-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, review of staff statements, medical record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive and effective pressure ulcer program to ensure wound care was provided to prevent a decline Resident #150's wound status. Actual Harm occurred beginning on 07/24/25 when Resident #150 returned from a hospitalization and wound care orders to treat a chronic right heel wound were not transcribed into the facility's electronic health record (EHR) for implementation. Between 07/24/25 and 08/20/25, Resident #150 had no wound care orders in place and had no documented wound dressing changes recorded. Resident #150 was seen by Wound Nurse Practitioner (NP) #706 on 08/20/25 who noted the wound had deteriorated and had an increase in wound exudate. Resident #150 was hospitalized on [DATE] and required a debridement (a medical procedure to remove dead, infected, or damaged tissue from a wound) for gas gangrene (bacterial infection that destroys muscle tissue) of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, hospital record review, facility policy review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure timely evaluation, physician notification and treatment following a fall with fracture for Resident #205. Actual Harm occurred for Resident #205 on 10/21/24 at 7:19 P.M. when the facility received results of a STAT (immediate) x-ray indicating the resident had a left elbow fracture but failed to seek medical intervention or treatment for the resident. The nurse practitioner (NP) was notified of the results on 10/22/24 at 8:42 A.M. at which time an order was obtained to transfer the resident to the hospital. The delay in treatment and lack of timely medical intervention resulted in Resident #205 experiencing increased pain and resulted in a delay in the facility identification of additional injuries (the hospital identified the resident also had a left acetabulum fracture, left iliac fossa (bone that is part of the hip) fracture and left retroperitoneal hemorrhage (bleeding in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on record review, facility policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #99's received assistance with activities daily living (ADLs) to maintain adequate and necessary personal and oral hygiene. Actual harm occurred on 06/21/24 when Resident #99, who was totally dependent on staff assistance for ADLs, did not receive sufficient hygienic care and developed maggots in her mouth and nose, requiring hospitalization. This affected one resident (#99) of three residents reviewed for ADL care. The facility census was 47. Findings include: Review of Resident #99's closed medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] and discharged to the hospice house on 06/21/24 with diagnoses including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), dysphagia and gastrostomy status. Review of Resident #99's ADL Self-Care Performance Deficit Care Plans with an admission date of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-28 · tag F0559 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were notified in writing of a room move. This affected three residents (#110, #115, #117) of three residents reviewed for room moves. The facility census was 50.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #110 revealed an admission date of 06/07/24 and diagnoses including dementia, congestive heart failure (CHF), and hypertension.Review of the clinical census revealed Resident #110 had a room move on 12/31/24.Review of the progress note dated 12/31/24 revealed Resident #110 requested a room move.Review of the medical record revealed no evidence of a written room move notification was issued.2. Review of the medical record for Resident #115 revealed an admission date of 03/11/25 and diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and dementia.Review of the clinical census revealed Resident #115 had a room move on 04/22/25.Review of the progress note dated 04/22/25 revealed social services discussed a room move with Resident #115. Resident #115…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-14 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain the shower on the [NAME] hallway in good working condition. This had the potential to affect 11 residents (#7, #15, #22, #24, #33, #35, #38, #40, #43, #45, and #47) who used the [NAME] Hallway shower. The facility census was 48. Findings include: On 10/08/25 at 8:55 A.M., an interview with Family Member #263 revealed the shower on the [NAME] Hallway had several titles falling off the wall and they have been like that for about a year now.Observation of the [NAME] hallway shower room with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #300 on 10/08/25 at 9:17 A.M. revealed the toilet broken off the seal in the floor, there was feces smeared on the outside of the toilet, there were six tiles pulled off the shower stall wall around the floor exposing a very large hole in the wall. There were two tiles missing from the bottom corner of the shower stall with a hole in the wall exposed. There was a pile of broken tile in the corner of the shower stall. An interview at this with LPN #300 confirmed the tiles…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of Self-Reported Incidents (SRI), staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse for Resident #51. This affected one resident (#51) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 48.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, adjustment disorder with depressed mood, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, atrial fibrillation, abdominal aortic aneurysm, hypertension, benign prostatic hyperplasia, pacemaker, cystic disease of the liver, bradycardia, transient ischemic attack, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the Discharge Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 had moderately impaired cognition with no behaviors. Review of the progress notes from 04/01/25 to 04/10/25 revealed no documentation of allegation of mistreatment being investigated. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a treatment was timely initiated for treatment of Resident #36's yeast infection. This affected one resident (#36) of three residents reviewed prompt and adequate care. The facility census was 48. Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included infection of the skin, cognitive communication deficit, personality disorder, Parkinson's disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hyperlipidemia, anemia, major depressive disorder, disorder of adult personality and behavior, hypothyroidism, and dementia.Review of the Health Status note dated 03/12/25 at 5:54 A.M. revealed Resident #36 was awake most of the night complaining about a pain and burning sensation in her vaginal area. There was no further documentation or evidence the physician being notified. Review of the Nursing Note dated 03/24/25 at 10:51 A.M revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the medical record, review of manufacturer's instructions, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the air mattress for Resident #10 was set at the appropriate weight for him. This affected one resident (Resident #10) of three residents reviewed for preventative interventions in place. The facility census was 48.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), diabetes, hemiplegia of the left side, anoxic brain damage, aphasia, dysphagia, anemia, osteoarthritis, traumatic brain injury, anxiety disorder, neuromuscular disfunction of the bladder, adult failure to thrive, peripheral vascular disease and bed confinement. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 had severely impaired cognition, was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs) and had an indwelling…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-14 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, review of the hospital records, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to properly care for the feeding tube for Resident #10 to prevent mold from forming within the tube. This affected one resident (#10) of three residents reviewed for feeding tubes. The facility census was 48.Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), diabetes, hemiplegia of the left side, anoxic brain damage, aphasia, dysphagia, anemia, osteoarthritis, traumatic brain injury, anxiety disorder, neuromuscular disfunction of the bladder, adult failure to thrive, peripheral vascular disease, and bed confinement.Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 had severely impaired cognition, was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs) and had an indwelling urinary catheter.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of a self-reported incident (SRI), and policy review, the facility failed to timely investigate and report allegations of misappropriation to the State Survey Agency. This affected one (#5) of three residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 47. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 08/18/24. Diagnoses included congestive heart failure, alcoholic cirrhosis of liver with ascites, and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 had intact cognition. Review of an SRI submitted to the State Survey Agency on 12/19/24 at 12:21:15 P.M. revealed an allegation of a staff member taking $40.00 from Resident #5. The SRI revealed Resident #5 alleged he gave Housekeeper #200 $40.00 on 12/10/24 to purchase vape (an electronic device that heats a liquid into an aerosol that is inhaled through a mouthpiece) supplies.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen and further failed to ensure male staff with beards wore hair restraints while in the kitchen. This had the potential to affect all 50 residents. Findings include: 1. Observations on 10/21/24 from 8:36 A.M. to 8:56 A.M., during the initial kitchen tour with Dietary Manager (DM) #368, revealed various food splatter and stains on the outside of the steamer table and on the shelf underneath. The preparation (prep) table had three large, open bags of dried pasta stored on the shelf with clean pots and pans. Both shelves of the prep table were dirty with various dried food and debris. The stove and the flat grill were covered in black, dried, burnt-on grease and dust covered grease was observed under the flat grill area. The back wall and floor between the steamer and stove had various dried food splatters and debris, with dried food crumbs and debris on the pipe affixed to this wall. On the floor underneath the dish machine was a dark colored dried substance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-28 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and resident interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean, sanitary and safe environment. This had the potential to affected all 50 residents residing in the facility. The facility census 50. Findings include: 1. Observation on 10/22/24 at 3:50 P.M. of the west hall shower room with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #374 revealed a spa tub that appeared to be nonfunctional. The bottom side of the tub had a cover that was pulled off exposing a pipe and wires. Coinciding interview with CNA # 374 verified the finding and stated the chair portion to the tub broke about a month ago and the facility was waiting on a new part. 2. Observation on 10/23/24 between 2:00 P.M. and 2:32 P.M., during an environmental tour with Housekeeping Supervisor (HSKP) #369 and Maintenance Director (MD) #321, revealed the following: - The ceiling fans that were in the dinning area were noted to be unclean and the blades full of dust. - One of the ceiling fans in the dinning room had no chain and was unable to be turned off. - The dinning room tables and chair were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-28 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure grievances during resident council meetings related to evening snacks not being distributed were responded to timely and appropriately. This affected eight residents (#10, #11, #21, #22, #32 #37, #44 and #52) who attended the resident council group meeting, and one resident (#36) reviewed for food. The facility census was 50. Findings include: Interview on 10/21/24 at 11:54 A.M. with Resident #36 revealed snacks in the evening were not being passed. Review of the resident council meeting minutes dated 07/22/24, 08/21/24, and 09/18/24 revealed either snacks were not being distributed or brought to all the rooms in the evening. Completion of the resident council group meeting portion of the annual survey on 10/24/24 between 11:00 A.M. and 12:00 P.M. with Residents #10, #11, #21, #22, #32, #37, #44 and #52 revealed significant concerns related to snacks being unavailable before and after resident meals. Multiple residents commented that staff eat the majority and often times eat all of the snacks that are left at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 31 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of the record for Resident #19 revealed an admission date of 09/09/24 with diagnoses including recurrent E. Coli, striatonigral degeneration, obstructive and reflux uropathy, type two diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypothyroidism, atherosclerotic heart disease, occlusion and stenosis of carotid artery, aortic ectasia, generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and panic disorder. Upon admission, Resident #19 presented with an indwelling urinary catheter related to the diagnoses of obstructive and reflux uropathy, a wound to her right lower extremity, and blanching in the perineal area. Review of the physician's order dated 09/10/24 indicated once daily wound care instructions for the right lower extremity wound and the open area at the intergluteal cleft. Review of the physician's orders dated 09/16/24 indicated Foley (indwelling urinary catheter) to continuous drainage for urinary retention along with orders for Foley care. Review of the comprehensive care plan for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-28 · tag F0569 — isolated
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure resident funds were conveyed timely upon a discharge or death. This affected one resident (#102) of one resident reviewed for personal funds conveyance upon death or discharge. The facility census was 50. Findings include: Resident #102 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including end stage renal disease, heart failure, and anxiety disorder. Review of census records revealed Resident #102 expired at the facility on [DATE]. Review of the account records revealed Resident #102's account was closed on [DATE], and $160.21 was disbursed to Resident #102's estate. Interview with Business Manager (BM) #301 on [DATE] at 4:30 P.M. revealed Resident #102's personal funds were not dispersed with in required time frames (30 days upon on a resident's death or discharge).

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-28 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed an admission date of 02/27/21 with diagnoses including cerebral infraction, a stroke affecting the right dominant side, dementia, aphasia, contracture of the right hand, atrial fibrillation, and legionnaires disease. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #20 had impaired cognition and required substantial to maximum assistance with showers and dressing. Review of the plan of care dated 09/24/24 revealed Resident #20 was recovering from legionnaires disease. Interventions included notifying the guardian and physician. In addition to assessing the resident's respiratory status. Review of the progress note dated 08/23/24 at 4:15 P.M. revealed Resident #20 was sent out to the hospital by emergency medical services (911) per physician order. Note dated 08/31/24 at 6:30 P.M. stated Resident #20 arrived by stretcher to the facility. The resident was alert and oriented and on two liters of oxygen. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-28 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure comprehensive assessments were implemented and completed for Residents #7 and #204. This affected two residents (#7 and #204) of 17 sample residents reviewed for assessments. The facility census was 50. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 09/01/20 with diagnoses including psychotic disorder, delusions, insomnia, and seizures. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #7 had intact cognition and required partial to moderate assistance with rolling left and right. Review of the plan of care dated 09/24/24 revealed Resident #7 had a mobility deficit related to seizures, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, and spinal stenosis. Interventions for bed mobility included supervision from one staff to turn and reposition in bed and bilateral grab bars to each side of the bed to assist with turning and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-28 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete a required Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment upon Resident #30's discharge from the facility. This affected one resident (#30) of two residents reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 50. Findings include: Resident #102 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Hepatitis C, cocaine abuse, chest pain, and kidney failure. Review of the census records and nursing progress notes, Resident #102 was discharged from the facility on 07/03/24. Review of the MDS records for Resident #102 revealed an initial MDS assessment was completed on 05/29/24. No other MDS assessments were completed for Resident #102 during his stay at the facility, including a required discharge assessment upon Resident #102 returning home from the facility. MDS Nurse #336 verified Resident #102's required discharge MDS assessment was not completed as required during an interview on 10/23/24 at 8:00 A.M. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, medical record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents who required staff assistance with baths/showers received needed care. This affected two (#22 and #51) of five residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). The facility census was 50. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 04/23/24. Diagnoses included left femur fracture, difficulty in walking, repeated falls, congestive heart failure (CHF) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/11/24, revealed Resident #22 had impaired cognition, had no behaviors and required partial/moderate assistance from staff for showers and bathing. Interview on 10/21/24 at 3:47 P.M. with Resident #22 revealed he has not had a shower or bath in the last two weeks and the water in the bathroom was cold. Concurrent observation revealed a strong odor in the resident's room. Observation on 10/22/24 at 3:44 P.M. of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-28 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, review of hospital documents, staff documents and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure an accurate weight was obtained to monitor nutritional status for a resident at risk for significant weight loss. This affected one (#201) of two residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 50. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #201 revealed an admission date of 10/08/24 with diagnoses including dementia with behavioral disturbance, Meniere's disease, hypertension, osteoarthritis, anemia, rheumatoid arthritis and major depressive disorder, severe, with psychotic features. Review of the care plan dated 10/15/24 revealed Resident #201 had a nutritional problem related to diagnoses, psychotropic medications, weight loss, underweight related to body mass index (BMI) and mechanically altered diet. Interventions included the following: weight per facility protocol; monitor, record and report to the physician signs/symptoms of malnutrition; and monitor, document and report to the physician signs/symptoms of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-28 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident and staff interview, medical record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to accurately document and effectively manage resident's pain. This affected one (#204) of two residents reviewed for pain management. The facility census was 50. Findings include: Review of the record for Resident #204 revealed an admission date of 09/30/24 with diagnoses including polyneuropathy, subluxation of C3/C4 cervical vertebrae, mid-cervical region cervical disc disorder with myelopathy, cervical spine fusion, adult failure to thrive, bradycardia, generalized anxiety, history of alcohol abuse and chronic post-traumatic stress disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/07/24, revealed Resident #204 was cognitively intact, used a wheelchair for mobility and required minimal staff assistance for all activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of the comprehensive care plan initiated, 10/01/24, revealed no care plan was initiated for Resident #204's risk for pain due to his diagnosis of polyneuropathy and spinal issues. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-28 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, review of pharmacy recommendations, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were addressed in a timely manner. This affected one (#14) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 50. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 01/03/24. Diagnoses included dementia, schizoaffective disorder, suicidal ideation and major depressive disorder. Review of the October 2024 physician orders revealed active orders for: • Breo Ellipta Inhalation Aerosol Powder Breath Activated 100-25 microgram/actuation (mcg/act) one inhalation, inhale orally one time a day related to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with a start date of 01/27/24. • Tiotropium Bromide Monohydrate Inhalation Aerosol Solution 2.5 mcg/act, two puff inhale orally one time a day related to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with a start date of 01/27/24. • Seroquel oral tablet 50 milligrams (mg), give one tablet by mouth every eight hours as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-28 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure as needed (PRN) psychotropic medication orders had an end date. This affected one (#14) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 50. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 01/03/24. Diagnoses included dementia, schizoaffective disorder, suicidal ideation and major depressive disorder. Review of the October 2024 physician orders revealed active orders for: Seroquel oral tablet 50 milligrams (mg), give one tablet by mouth every eight hours PRN for Schizophrenia with a start date of 08/20/24. The order had no end date. Ativan oral tablet one mg, give one tablet by mouth every six hours PRN for anxiety with a start date of 03/18/24. The order had no end date. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) from April 2024 through October 2024 revealed Resident #14 received the PRN Ativan 27 times in April, six times in May, four times in June and no administration of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-28 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, review of manufacturer's instructions and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors during insulin administration. This affected one (#2) of five residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 50. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed an admission date of 03/31/23 with diagnoses including aphasia, type II diabetes, traumatic brain injury, cerebral infraction (stroke) and anxiety. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/06/24, revealed the resident had impaired cognition and received insulin by injection. Review of the plan of care dated 10/04/24 revealed Resident #2 had diabetes mellitus. Intervention included to administer medication as ordered by the physician. Review of the physician's orders dated October 2024 revealed the resident had an order for Lispro (fast acting insulin) to be injected subcutaneous (into layer of skin) by pen prior to meals and before…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-28 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, record review and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #30 received timely and adequate dental services. This affected one resident (Resident #30) out of three residents reviewed for dental services. The facility census was 51. Findings include: Review of Resident #30's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/19/23 and diagnoses included syncope and collapse, unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety, heart failure, and hemiplegia (paralysis) affecting the left nondominant side. Review of Resident #30's care plan revised 04/22/24 included Resident #30 received hospice care from a local hospice agency. Diagnosis of dementia with prognosis of less than six months. Resident #30 would receive integrated care from the facility and hospice agency that would meet her physical, social, intellectual, emotional and spiritual needs. Interventions included hospice agency and facility staff to maintain open lines of communication to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-28 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, review of the hospital discharge documents and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure effective communication between attending physicians and administration to ensure adequate and appropriate resident care. This affected one (#20) of one resident reviewed for coordination of care. The facility census was 50. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed an admission date of 02/27/21 with diagnoses including cerebral infraction (stroke) affecting the right dominant side, dementia, aphasia, contracture of the right hand, atrial fibrillation and Legionnaires disease. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/13/24, revealed the resident had impaired cognition and needed substantial to maximum assistance with showers and dressing. Review of the plan of care dated 09/24/24 revealed Resident #20 was recovering from Legionnaires disease. Interventions included to notify the guardian and physician and to assess respiratory status. Review of the progress note dated 08/23/24 revealed Resident #20…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-01 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility Appointment and Transportation Form the facility failed to ensure Resident #53's frequent urinary tract infections were comprehensively assessed, care planned, and treated timely to assist in preventing re-occurring infection. This affected one resident (Resident #53) out of three residents reviewed for urinary tract infections. The facility census was 52. Findings include: Review of Resident #53's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/30/23 and diagnoses included displaced fracture of lateral end of right clavicle, subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing, adjustment disorder with depressed mood, and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Review of Resident #53's care plan dated 08/07/23 included Resident #53 had mixed bladder incontinence related to impaired mobility. Resident #53 would remain free from skin breakdown due to incontience and brief use through the review date. Interventions included to encourage fluids during the day…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-03-18 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespread
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of the Self-Reported Incident (SRI) log, personnel record review, court docket review, facility policy review, and interview, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy and procedure regarding reference checks. This had the potential to affect all residents who resided in the facility. The census was 55. Findings include: Review of the personnel record for State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #2 revealed a hire date of 09/27/22. Review of the Application for Employment dated 09/26/21 revealed STNA #2 answered no to the question of have you ever plead guilty to or been convicted of a crime other than a driving-related misdemeanor? There were two Verification of Employment forms referencing STNA #2's current and past skilled nursing facility (SNF) employers. The two Verification of Employment forms were incomplete and there was no evidence the forms were sent to the two employers to answer. Review of the State Nurse Aide Registry license verification form revealed STNA #2 was not eligible to work and was not in good standing due to committing abuse,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-18 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, closed medical record review, review of pest control invoices and interview, the facility failed to treat Resident #56 and Resident #57's power wheelchairs with respect. This affected two ( #56 and #57) of three residents reviewed for personal property. The census was 55. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for former Resident #56 revealed an admission date of 01/31/23, discharge date of 12/12/23 with diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis, muscle weakness, cognitive communication deficit, reduced mobility, and homelessness. Review of the hospital social work assessment and discharge plan dated 01/25/23 revealed Resident #56 and Resident #56's son (Resident #57) were evicted that morning. Resident #56's case manager was told to present to the emergency department to help with placement. When Resident #56 and son arrived, they were found to have bed bugs and cockroaches. They were both decontaminated. Resident #56 had applied to multiple apartments since getting the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-18 · tag F0624 — isolated
    Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to provide an orderly discharge for former Resident #56. This affected one (Resident #56) of three former residents reviewed for discharging against medical advice (AMA). The census was 55. Finding include: Review of the closed medical record for former Resident #56 revealed an admission date of 01/31/23, discharge date of 12/12/23 with diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis, muscle weakness, cognitive communication deficit, reduced mobility, and homelessness. Review of the hospital social work assessment and discharge plan dated 01/25/23 revealed Resident #56 and Resident #56's son (Resident #57) were evicted that morning. Resident #56's case manager was told to present to the emergency department to help with placement. Resident #56 had applied to multiple apartments since getting the eviction notice and was on multiple wait lists and unable to stay with friends or family as there were not any in the community. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-18 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, infection control log review and interview, the facility to timely obtain lab services for Resident #43. This affected one (Resident #43) of three residents reviewed for infections. The census was 55. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #43 revealed an admission date of 01/30/24 with diagnoses of parkinsonism, history of falling, rhabdomyolysis, metabolic encephalopathy and Clostridium difficile (C.diff) diarrhea. Review of the health status note dated 01/30/24 timed 5:45 P.M. revealed Resident #43 arrived via cot with admission diagnosis of C-difficile (a bacteria that causes diarrhea and colitis). Review of the health status note dated 01/30/24 timed 8:02 P.M. revealed contact precautions in effect for C.diff. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #43 was cognitively intact, needed partial/moderate assistance with toileting and was always incontinent of bowel. Review of the health status…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-18 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, Centers for Disease Control (CDC) website review, pest control invoices review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to eradicate bed bugs in a resident room prior to Resident #60 being admitted to the room. This affected one (Resident #60) of eight residents reviewed for bed bugs. The census was 55. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #62 revealed an admission date 01/04/24, discharge date to home of 02/04/24 with diagnoses of fracture of left femur, respiratory syncytial virus pneumonia, alcohol dependence and chronic embolism and thrombosis deep veins of left lower extremity. Resident #62 resided in private room [ROOM NUMBER] during his entire stay. Review of the closed medical record for Resident #60 revealed an admission date of 02/06/24, discharge date to home of 02/21/24 with diagnoses of cerebral infarction, aphasia, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting left dominant side. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-05-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure opened food products were dated and labeled. This had the potential to affect 43 of 45 residents receiving food from the kitchen. The facility identified Residents #21 and #30 as not receiving food by mouth. Findings include: A tour of the kitchen was completed on 05/02/22 at 8:30 A.M. through 9:00 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #518. Observation of the food stored in the three door freezer in the room off the dry storage room on 05/02/22 at 8:40 A.M. revealed the following which were confirmed by DM #518: Open and undated bags of frozen hash browns, stuffed cabbage rolls, cookies, chicken tenders and fish. Observation of the two door freezer outside the dry storage room on 05/02/22 at 8:45 A.M. revealed the following which were confirmed by DM #518: An open bag of frozen spinach, not dated. Observation of the dry storage room on 05/02/22 at 8:50 A.M. revealed the following which were confirmed by DM #518: An open bag of spoons which should have been sealed per DM #518 and three open, undated bags of dry cereal.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-05 · tag F0569 — pattern
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of resident fund accounts and spend down letters and interview the facility failed to notify Residents #2, #33 and #41, who received Medicaid benefits, when the amount in the account reached $200.00 less than the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) limit of $2,000.00. This affected three of four residents reviewed for management of personal funds accounts. The facility census was 45. Findings include: Review of resident accounts revealed the facility managed personal accounts for Residents #2, #33 and #41, and all three received Medicaid benefits. Review of spend down letters dated 10/28/21 for Residents #2, #33 and #41 revealed they were notified their accounts were close to the $2,000.00 Medicaid eligibility limit and each residents' account exceeded the SSI limit at that time. Resident #2's letter indicated she had $3,210.27, Resident #33's letter indicated she had $3,521.15 and Resident #41's letter indicated he had #9,375.51 in their respective accounts. Their letters indicated if their assets reached or exceeded the $2,000.00 limit they would lose their Medicaid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #23, Resident #29 and Resident #41 were comprehensively assessed and care plans were developed regarding health conditions, psychotropic medication use and activities of daily living. This affected three (Residents #23, #29 and #41) of 19 residents whose care plans were reviewed. The facility census was 44. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #23 revealed an admission date of 03/03/22 with diagnoses including anemia, non-Hodgkin lymphoma hypertension, arthritis and corneal transplant. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 indicating Resident #23 was cognitively intact. She required extensive assistance in the areas of turning and repositioning in bed, moving between surfaces such as from a bed to a chair, dressing, and toilet use and was totally dependent on staff to move about her room and throughout the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure timely incontinence care for residents. This affected two (Residents #30 and #11) of three residents observed for incontinence care. The facility census was 45. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #30's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/18/21 with diagnoses that included incontinence and muscle weakness. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had impaired cognition, required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, dressing and personal hygiene, and total dependence with toileting. She was incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of the care plan dated 12/15/21 revealed self care deficits related to decreased mobility and weakness and interventions included provide a sponge bath when a full bath or shower cannot be tolerated. Resident #30 required assistance of one staff member and additional assistance as needed for increased weakness or fatigue. 2. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored and discarded when expired. This had the potential to affect all 45 residents currently residing in the facility. Findings include: Observation on 05/02/22 at 10:37 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #502 revealed the medication cart contained a bottle of Geri-Tussin (liquid cough syrup) that had expired on 11/2021. Interview with LPN #502 at the time of the observation revealed she had not checked expiration dates prior to beginning medication administration. LPN #502 verified the Geri-Tussin should have been discarded as indicated by the expiration date. Observation on 05/02/22 at 11:06 A.M. with LPN #510 revealed various unidentifiable loose pills in different compartments of the medication cart, a bottle of Geri-Tussin with an expiration date of 11/2021, and a bottle of Docusate (liquid stool softener) with an expiration date of 04/2022. Interview with LPN #510 at the time of the observation revealed she had not checked expiration dates prior to beginning medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, facility policy review, review of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Considerations for Preventing Spread of COVID-19, and review of the CDC COVID Tracker website the facility failed to maintain proper infection control procedures to prevent the potential spread of infection including proper COVID screening, use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and hand hygiene practices. This had the potential to affect all 45 residents currently residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Observation on 05/02/22 at 7:35 A.M. revealed the front reception area did not have have a COVID screening questionnaire, thermometer for obtaining temperatures, or a sign in log. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #504 revealed nothing was required prior to entry. A second interview with LPN #504 at 7:55 A.M. revealed a COVID questionnaire should be completed prior to entry into the facility. Observation revealed LPN #504 had a questionnaire that consisted of international travel, exposure, symptoms, cough or shortness of breath within the last 14 days and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-05-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure only pasteurized eggs were used for residents and failed to ensure all kitchen equipment was clean and stored in a sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all 45 residents residing in the facility. Finding include: On 05/28/19 from 9:46 A.M. through 10:07 A.M. an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted with Dietary Supervisor (DS) #703. During the tour the following observations were made: In the refrigerator there was a carton of unpasteurized eggs. The stove knobs had accumulated grease and residue. On the shelf above the stove there was a thin layer of grease and dust. Several large pots were stored on the shelf with the open sides up. Dietary Supervisor #703 verified the above findings at the time of the observations. Review of the undated Dietary department responsibilities handout revealed only pasteurized eggs were to be used.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive and individualized plan of care for Resident #147 related to incontinence. This affected one resident (Resident #147) of one resident reviewed for incontinence care. Findings include: Record review of Resident #147 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including hemiplegia, major depressive disorder, symbolic dysfunctions, and suspected elder physical abuse. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 05/16/19 revealed the resident was frequently incontinent of urine and always incontinent of bowels. No evidence could be found in the care plan of any acknowledgement the resident was incontinent or plan to provide appropriate care for their incontinence. Interview with State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #701 on 05/29/19 at 10:46 A.M. revealed she was familiar with Resident #147 and confirmed the resident was incontinent. Interview with the Director of Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-05-30 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to develop a comprehensive discharge summary for Resident #48. This affected one resident (Resident #48) of two residents reviewed for transfer/discharge. Findings include: Record review of Resident #48 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis including a displaced fracture of left femur. The discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 03/04/2019 revealed the resident was independent for transfers, to walk in the room, locomotion, dressing, eating, toilet use and personal hygiene. Limited assistance was needed for walking any distance. The resident was cognitively intact. The resident was discharged on 03/04/19. Review of the East Park Care Resident Discharge Summary Form revealed it had not been completed. The physician's name and the diagnosis were on the form but no other information. There was no overview of the resident's stay, post -discharge plan of care or discharge instructions. Interview with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-30 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure stop dates within 14 days were included in orders for as-needed (PRN) psychotropic medications for Resident #147 and Resident #33. The facility also failed to ensure duplicate entries were not in place for PRN psychoactive medications in the medication administration record (MAR) for Resident #147. This affected two residents (Resident #33 and #147) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #147 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including hemiplegia, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, symbolic dysfunctions, and suspected elder physical abuse. Record review revealed a physician order for the anti-anxiety medication, Lorazepam (Ativan) 0.5 milligrams (mg) to be given three times per day PRN for anxiety for 30 days. The start and end dates of the order were not identified on the order sheet. No evidence could be found identifying…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to maintain adequate infection control practices during meal delivery to prevent the spread of infection. This affected two residents (Resident #44 and Resident #148) of two residents observed receiving meal trays in their rooms. The facility census was 45. Findings Include: Observation of State tested nursing assistant (STNA) #600 delivering lunch meal trays to resident rooms on 05/28/19 at 12:38 P.M. revealed STNA #600 entered the room of Resident #44, placed the meal tray down and unfolded the paper surrounding a muffin without first washing her hands or using gloves. An interview with STNA #600 was made shortly after leaving the resident's room, STNA #600 verified she did not wash/sanitize her hands or wear gloves as she touched the food. Observation of STNA #601 on 05/30/19 at 12:45 P.M. revealed STNA #601 entered Resident #148's room, unwrapped a straw and holding it by the top, placed it into the resident's cup. STNA #601 did not wash/sanitize hands or wear gloves. An interview with STNA #601 verified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-10-28 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility assessment and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the facility assessment contained all required information. This had the potential to affect all 50 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 50. Findings include: Review the facility assessment dated [DATE] revealed the assessment did not contain the following required information: - Evidence of direct input into the assessment from direct care staff, including but not limited to, Registered Nurses (RNs), Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs), Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) and other representatives of the direct care staff. - Consideration of specific staffing needs for each shift (day, evening and night) or plans to adjust, as necessary, based on any changes to its resident population. - Consideration of specific staffing needs for each resident unit in the facility and plans to adjust, as necessary, based on changes to its resident population. Interview on 10/21/24 at 2:15 P.M. with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$84,417 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $35,595 — penalty dated 2025-10-14
  • $48,822 — penalty dated 2024-10-28
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-11-20 for 7 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIONSTONE CARE — 24 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.7-0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 23 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
KAZARNOVSKY, SOLOMONIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF50%since 10/01/2021
STEIN, ABBAIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF50%since 10/01/2021
CUSNER, ADAMIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/27/2025
DEGYANSKY, JEFFREYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2020
GOLDISH, ELIEZERIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/09/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+0.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$556K
Related-party expense9% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 17%Medicare 10%Other / private 73%

This home reported $556K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$359per resident / day
operating cost
$10,921per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$360per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365731. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-10-28, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next