No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Oak Grove Manor

1670 Crider Rd, Mansfield, OH 44903 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 75 certified beds · (419) 589-6222 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0609, F0610) — most recent Oct 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$15,593 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (71) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $15,593 in federal fines (most recent 2023-12-27)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (68%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1600 Crider Rd · (419) 775-1769 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Rite Aid1.5 mi
1075 Ashland Rd · (419) 589-8843 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1229 Ashland Rd · (419) 589-0005 · Call to confirm hours
Park
(614) 466-7170 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
St. Mary's<0.1 mi
1630 Ashland Rd · (419) 589-2114

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.6%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.3%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms15.0%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.9%3.2%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened2.6%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.7%25.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine82.4%94.5%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.7%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control30.6%21.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table12.0%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.2%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine11.4%75.6%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission16.4%24.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.1%12.9%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.181.731.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.691.801.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 36 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

47.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
50.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.39U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.19hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 34 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 67% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF47.0%CMS range 31.4–60.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.5%CMS range 5.8–13.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge50.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge32.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge58.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.6%CMS range 3.6–15.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.161.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.42
RN hours/ resident / day
0.84
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.06
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.32
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.23
RN hoursweekends
68.1%
Total nursing turnover
88.2%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 75 beds and averages 71.6 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.32 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.06 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.79 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.53 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 68% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-01)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-16)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

71 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 59 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-02-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, review of the facility Elopement/Unauthorized Absence policy and procedure and interviews with staff and the transportation driver, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and comprehensive individualized interventions to prevent Resident #14, who was identified at risk for elopement, from leaving the building when on an outside doctor's appointment, unaccompanied by facility staff or family, and prior to the transportation company picking her up and returning her to the facility after the appointment had concluded. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for serious life-threatening harm, negative health outcomes, and/or death when Resident #14, who was assessed to be at risk for elopement, exited the doctor's office without staff knowledge when the appointment was completed. This affected one (#14) of two residents reviewed for elopement. The facility identified 11 residents (#7, #14, #19, #28, #31, #39, #42, #46, #51, #56, and #60) who were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, resident interview, and record review, the facility failed provide ongoing assessment and monitoring of existing pressure ulcers, failed to complete treatments as ordered by the physician, and failed to notify the physician of the need to alter treatment when pressure ulcers increased in size and when new pressure ulcers developed. This affected two (Resident #63 and #69) of three residents reviewed for skin breakdown. Actual harm occurred when Resident #69 did not have any ongoing assessments of existing pressure ulcers and did not have treatments applied as ordered which resulted in the Stage 3 pressure to the resident's right buttock increasing in size from 7 centimeters (cm) by 5 cm to 12.1 cm by 8 cm by 2 cm. The facility census was 75. Finding include: 1. Review of the open medical record for Resident #69 revealed admission on [DATE]. Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, chronic pain syndrome and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. Review of the admission Minimum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-25 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, staff interview, resident interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure food was palatable and appropriate temperature. This had the potential to affect all 75 residents residing in the facility who receive food from the kitchen. Findings include:Review of the resident council meeting for 09/08/25 revealed residents did not like most of the food due to having the same food, dry meat, and food not being seasoned. Under the area that reads status update on the resident council minutes revealed the concern was not resolved. Interview on 09/24/25 at 1:39 P.M. with Resident #53 revealed breakfast was always cold so he no longer eats breakfast. Resident #53 stated he has reported it to the Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs); however, nothing has changed. Resident #53 stated the CNAs would offer to reheat the food; however that was not preferred. Interview on 09/24/25 at 2:00 P.M. with Resident #4 revealed the food was frequently cold by the times the trays were passed. Resident #4 stated she eats the food because she was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medical appointments were timely scheduled as physician ordered. This affected one (Resident #36) of two residents reviewed for appointments. The facility census was 75. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #36 revealed an admission on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic ischemic heart disease and acute diastolic (congestive) heart failure (CHF). Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #36 was cognitively intact. Review of the care plan dated 08/18/25 revealed Resident #36 had altered cardiovascular status related to CHF and hypertension. Interventions included monitoring and reporting to medical providers any signs and symptoms of chest pain or pressure especially with activity, heartburn, nausea and vomiting, shortness of breath, excessive sweating, dependent edema, changes in capillary refill, color or warmth of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a kitchen did not have expired food, kitchen was clean and sanitary, and opened food items were not labeled or dated. This had the potential to affect all 73 residents residing in the facility who receive food from the kitchen. Findings include: A tour of the kitchen on 06/29/25 from 8:10 A.M. through 8:33 A.M. revealed in the dry storage room, there were 12 bags of raisins that had a best buy date of 07/14/24, red wine vinegar was opened and had a best if used 03/13/24, molasses was opened and had a best if used by date of 11/15/24, and ziti, penne and elbow pasta bags were opened with no label or date. In the walk-in refrigerator, the packages of biscuits, waffles, pepperoni, and sliced cheese were not labeled and dated. In the preparation area, there was grease on the floor behind the convection oven and the microwave had dried food on the top of the inside of the microwave. The stand up fan had food splatter on the base of the stand. Interview with Dietary [NAME] #340 on 06/29/25 at 8:34 A.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-07-01 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — widespread
    Have policies on smoking.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure they implemented their smoking policy by ensuring the facilities grounds were free from discarded cigarette butts. This finding had the potential to affect all 73 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Observations on 06/29/25 at 1:05 P.M. revealed residents were on a supervised smoke break. Approximately 25 cigarette butts were noted in the rocks surrounding the smoking area. Fire proof receptacles and fire proof ashtrays were located in the smoking area. Interview 06/29/25 at 1:10 P.M. with Medical Records #1121 confirmed approximately 25 cigarette butts were in the rocks in the smoking area which were not cleaned up. A second observation on 06/30/25 at 9:52 A.M. revealed approximately five cigarette butts were lying on the ground surrounded by lint in front of the emergency exit off of the kitchen. Interview on 06/30/25 at 12:05 P.M. with the Administrator revealed it was every staff member's responsibility to pick up cigarette butts from the ground in the smoking areas. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    2. Observation on 06/29/25 at 11:16 A.M. revealed Registered Nurse (RN) #383 obtained a blood sugar using a blood glucose testing (BGT) machine for Resident #66. RN #383 then walked back down the hall and placed the contaminated BGT machine on top of the medication cart before placing the contaminated BGT machine in the top drawer of the medication cart without disinfecting the device. Interview on 06/30/25 at 11:51 A.M. with RN #383 with the Director of Nursing (DON) present revealed RN #383 obtained Resident #12's blood sugar just prior to obtaining Resident #66's blood sugar using the same BGT machine. RN #383 confirmed the multi-use BGT machine was not disinfected or decontaminated between residents because the medication administration cart did not have disinfectant wipes to disinfect or decontaminate the BGT machine to prevent the potential of cross contamination of blood borne pathogens. Interview on 07/01/25 at 9:20 A.M. with the DON confirmed nursing was not disinfecting the BGT machine after each use. The DON confirmed four residents (#34, #66, #223 and #224) shared the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-01 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, facility policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had accurate advance directive orders and consistent information in place throughout the medical record for Resident #121. This affected one (#121) of 23 residents reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 73. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #121 revealed an admission date of 04/05/19 with diagnoses including dementia. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #121 was rarely understood. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #121 revealed an order dated 02/28/25 for a Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care (DNRCC) code status (meaning only comfort measures would be initiated in the event of a medical emergency). Review of the plan of care dated 03/04/25 revealed Resident #121 was a DNRCC. Review of the hard medical chart for Resident #121 revealed there were two code statuses in the front of the chart.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete a treatment for Resident #12. This affected one of one resident reviewed for wound treatments. The facility census was 73. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed an admission date of 06/03/25. Resident #12 was hospitalized from [DATE] through 06/11/25. Resident #12 was readmitted [DATE]. Diagnoses included unspecified fracture of upper end of left tibia, diabetes mellitus, and adult failure to thrive. Review of the care plan initiated 06/05/25 and revised on 06/17/25 revealed he had an open area on his right hand related to gout. One intervention was to assess, monitor and record wound healing. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #12 was cognitively intact and received treatments and ointments to areas other than feet. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) from June 2025 revealed an order to cleanse area to back of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-01 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the Ohio Board of Nursing Administrative Code, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure they had sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate skills to complete the resident's central venous line therapy procedures. This affected one (Resident #122) of one resident reviewed for intravenous (IV) access. Findings include: Review of Resident #122's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including osteomyelitis and chronic kidney disease. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #112 exhibited intact cognition. Review of Resident #122's hospital discharge documentation dated 06/13/25 revealed an central venous catheter (CVC) double lumen (DL) tunneled left internal jugular (IJ) was placed on 06/06/25 and a hemodialysis central line access permanent catheter left internal jugular was placed on 06/03/25. Review of Resident #122's physician orders revealed an order dated 06/11/25 to use…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-01 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate did not exceed medication error rate of five percent (%) or greater. Two errors occurred within 28 opportunities for an error rate of 7.14%. This affected two (Residents #35 and #41) of four residents observed for medication administration. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident 41's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus and edema. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #41 had intact cognition. Review of Resident #41's physician orders dated [DATE] revealed an order for potassium chloride powder give 20 milliequivalents (meq) by mouth one time a day for a supplement. Observation on [DATE] at 8:15 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #308 administered Resident #41's morning medication administration. LPN #308 revealed she administered nine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-01 · tag F0800 — isolated
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents received the correct texture of diet and adaptive equipment as ordered by the physician. This affected one (Resident #53) of three residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility identified 18 residents on a mechanically altered diet. The facility census was 73. Findings include: Review of the medical record for the Resident #53 revealed an admission date of 03/08/25. Diagnoses included dementia and dysphagia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #53 had a memory problem and was on a therapeutic mechanically altered diet with no significant weight change. Review of the physician's orders for July 2025 revealed Resident #53 was ordered a regular diet, mechanically altered texture, and honey thick consistency liquids with finger foods as available. Review of Resident 53's diet ticket on 07/01/25 at 12:05 P.M. revealed Resident #53 was on a regular diet,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 59 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents had water at the appropriate temperature in their bathrooms. This affected three (Residents #3, #4, and #6) out of three reviewed for water temperatures. Facility census was 59. Findings include: Review of an invoice dated 10/16/24 revealed a fifty-gallon hot water tank was ordered. Review of a typed timeline provided by Maintenance Supervisor #104 revealed he was notified the hot water heater for Resident #3's room blew the seams out of the back. An order was placed for a new hot water heater. The new hot water heater was delivered late in the afternoon of 10/16/24. Maintenance Supervisor #104 installed the new hot water heater on 10/17/24. According to the timeline on 11/15/24, Maintenance Supervisor #104 was notified of the high limit switch and the breaker for the new hot water tank were tripping frequently. Maintenance Supervisor #104 replaced the upper thermostat on 11/15/24. On 11/22/24, Maintenance Supervisor #104 was notified that the water was cold again. Maintenance Supervisor #104 found the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure treatments were put in place in a timely manner. This affected three (Residents #3, #6, and #7) of three residents reviewed for wounds. Facility census was 59. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #3 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acquired absence of bilateral legs, peripheral vascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and chronic pain syndrome. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 was cognitively intact and had Moisture Associated Skin Damage (MASD). A skin condition/shower sheet dated 11/06/24 revealed Resident #3 had an open area that appeared to be an abrasion. Resident #3 requested to have an appointment made at the dermatologist. A skin monitoring/shower review sheet dated 11/12/24 revealed Resident #3 had an abrasion to buttock. Resident #3 did not want to see the facility Certified Nurse Practitioner (CNP). On 11/13/24 an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, review of a cleaning task list, and policy review, the facility failed to store food in a safe and sanitary manner and failed to ensure food service equipment, storage areas, and kitchen floor were properly cleaned. This had the potential to affect all 67 residents. The facility census was 67. Findings included: 1. Observation of the kitchen on 10/24/24 at 9:55 A.M. with Dietary Aide #134 revealed walk-in cooler #1 was full of boxes. The boxes were stored directly on the floor inside the cooler and staff were unable to walk into the cooler due to the amount of boxes stacked four to five boxes high. Interview with Dietary Aide #134 at the time of the observation revealed the facility received the food delivery the day before and no one had time to unpack the boxes. Dietary Aide #134 verified the boxes containing food items were stored directly on the cooler floor. Review of the undated policy titled, Food Storage, revealed all refrigerated food should be stored off of the floor. 2. Observation of the kitchen on 10/29/24 at 7:50 A.M. revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-29 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to maintain a pest free environment. This had the potential to affect all 67 residents. The census was 67. Findings include: 1. Observation on 10/28/24 at 10:00 A.M. revealed the dish washer room in the kitchen had, at minimum, four to five gnats and a fly. Further observation of the kitchen serving area revealed a fly was present in the area. Interview on 10/28/24 at 10:05 A.M. with Dietary Manager #119 verified the gnats and flies in the kitchen. 2. Observation on 10/29/24 at 9:30 A.M. revealed Resident #10 was sitting in a chair in his room. When Resident #10 moved, five (5) flies flew off of him. Interview on 10/29/24 at 9:32 A.M. with the Administrator verified the number of flies in Resident #10's side of the room. The Administrator removed the bag of garbage from the end of the resident's bed; however, no flies were observed near the garbage. Interview on 10/29/24 at 9:48 A.M. with Resident #23 revealed there are often flies in his room. Review of a policy titled, Pest Control Policy,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident family interview, staff interview, orthopedic staff interview, review of hand written statements, review of the facility incident and accident log, and policy review, the facility failed to investigate an injury of unknown origin as required. This affected one (#24) of three residents reviewed for abuse, neglect, mistreatment, exploitation, and misappropriation. The facility census was 67. Findings included: Review of Resident #24's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/17/24. Diagnoses included infection and inflammatory reaction due to an internal left knee joint prosthesis, periprosthetic fracture around internal prosthetic right hip joint, atrial fibrillation, transient ischemic attack, and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #24's clinical admission note dated 10/17/24 revealed the resident required use of a wheelchair and knee immobilizer. She had a range of motion impairment of one unspecified lower extremity. Resident #24's gait was documented as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-31 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility menu, resident interview, staff interview, observation, review of the facility food temperature logs, and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure food temperatures were assessed to ensure safe ranges prior to resident consumption. This had the potential to affect all 64 residents in the facility who were identified by the facility to receive food from the facility kitchen. The facility census was 64 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility lunch menu dated 07/30/24 revealed the following items were listed: chicken parmesan, spaghetti noodles, cauliflower, garlic toast. Interview on 07/30/24 at 8:26 A.M. with Resident #23 confirmed the food at the facility was fair, sometimes the hot items were not hot enough for her liking. Interview on 07/30/24 at 10:13 A.M. with Staff Member (SM) #510 confirmed she heard food concerns from residents on a daily basis, including hot food items were not hot enough, food was too tough, and residents receiving food they did not order or items they disliked. Interview on 07/30/24 at 11:01…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-31 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, resident interview, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors. This affected one (Residents #39) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 64 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #39 revealed an admission date of 11/11/17 with diagnoses including parkinsonism, bipolar disorder, osteoarthritis, and depression. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #39 dated 07/08/24 revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #39 revealed an order dated 09/15/23 for Gabapentin (an anti-seizure medication) 600 milligram (mg) tablets three times daily. The order included entries indicating the medication was reordered on 07/23/24 and 07/24/24. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident #39 dated July 2024 revealed the resident did not receive Gabapentin on 07/23/24 and 07/24/24. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-31 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to serve residents with orders for mechanically altered diets the proper textured diet as ordered by the physician. This affected three (Residents #11, #16, and #18) of 14 residents on a mechanically altered diets. The facility census was 64 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 08/23/19 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, oral phase dysphagia, muscle weakness, and a complete loss of teeth. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #11 dated 07/12/24 revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition, required a mechanically altered diet and received set up assistance with eating. Review of the care plan for Resident #11 dated 07/16/24 revealed the resident had the potential for oral/dental health problems related to being edentulous (no natural tooth or tooth fragments present) and was at risk for malnutrition and dehydration. Interventions included to consult with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-31 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, resident interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to serve resident meals which honored the resident's preferences and accommodated resident allergies. This affected three (Residents #11, #16, and #18) of 14 residents on a mechanically altered diets. The facility census was 64 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 08/23/19 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, oral phase dysphagia, muscle weakness, and a complete loss of teeth. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #11 dated 07/12/24 revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition, required a mechanically altered diet and received set up assistance with eating. Review of the care plan for Resident #11 dated 07/16/24 revealed the resident had the potential for oral/dental health problems related to being edentulous (no natural tooth or tooth fragments present) and was at risk for malnutrition and dehydration. Interventions included to consult…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-05-16 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — widespread
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure mail was delivered to residents on Saturdays. This affected nine (#3, #7, #17, #27, #33, #41, #52, #53, and #56) of nine residents interviewed regarding mail delivery and had the potential to affect all 70 residents residing in the facility. The census was 70. Findings include: Interview on 05/15/24 at approximately 10:00 A.M. with nine (#3, #7, #17, #27, #33, #41, #52, #53, and #56) residents during a Resident Council meeting revealed multiple concerns were expressed that residents were not receiving mail on Saturdays. The residents reported mail was delivered to the business office, sorted, and then distributed to residents by the activities department. The residents reported the business office was typically open Monday through Friday, so mail that was delivered to the facility on Saturday was never distributed to residents within 24 hours of delivery. During an interview on 05/15/24 at 10:40 A.M., Activities Assistant #41 reported the activities department staff were in charge of distributing mail to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-05-16 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure garbage and refuse was disposed of properly. This had the potential to affect all 70 residents residing in the facility. The census was 70. Findings include: During an observation on 05/13/24 at approximately 8:10 A.M., with Dietary Supervisor #55, two exterior facility dumpsters were observed with trash laying on the ground around the dumpsters. The trash included a potato bag, a chip bag, an empty applesauce container, a disposable glove, soup cans, bread wrappers, jelly packet wrappers, water and pop bottles, cookie wrappers, a used brief, a disposable plastic cup, sandwich wrappers, and a chicken nugget carton from a local fast-food chain. Further observation revealed unidentified animal track marks could be seen throughout the mud located near the dumpsters. During an interview at the time of the observation on 05/13/24, Dietary Supervisor #55 verified the debris on the ground around the dumpster and stated the facility had issues with raccoons.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, and review of a concern log, the facility failed to maintain comfortable sounds levels in the facility. This has the potential to affect nine (#3, #7, #17, #27, #33, #41, #52, #53, and #56) of nine residents who voiced concerns regarding the sound levels in the facility. The facility census was 70. Findings include: Observation at the nursing station, which was located in the center of the four units in the facility was completed on 05/15/24 at 7:10 A.M. The observation identified there was a very loud alarm that sounded anytime the door to the patio where residents who smoke go outside was opened. The alarm and panel was located at the front of the nursing station and was very loud. The alarm was heard going off multiple times on 05/15/24 including at 7:14 A.M., 7:18 A.M., and 7:20 A.M. The observation identified there are currently four unidentified residents who are not interviewable located at the nursing station and appeared annoyed at the ongoing sound. Interview with Resident #3 was completed on 05/15/24 at 1:57 P.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-16 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident representative interview, staff interview, and review of scheduled activities, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered or assisted in attending activities and failed to provide activities as scheduled. This affected six (#3, #17, #27, #41, #46, and #53) of nine residents reviewed for participation in activities. The facility census was 70. Findings include: 1. Review of the activity calendar for May 2024 revealed on 05/15/24 the facility would provide a detective activity at 2:00 P.M. and a daily walk outside at 3:00 P.M. Observation on 05/15/24 from 1:57 P.M. to approximately 2:30 P.M. revealed five (#3, #17, #27, #41, and #53) residents were sitting in the dining area where scheduled activities in the facility were planned to take place. Further observation revealed there were no staff in the area and no organized activities were taking place. Interviews at the time of observation revealed numerous random residents reported they were unsure if…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-16 · tag F0680 — pattern
    Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on personnel file review, staff interview, and review of a job description, the facility failed to ensure the activities program was directed by a qualified individual as required. This had the potential to affect all residents who resided in the facility with the exception of two (#32 and #60) residents who the facility identified as not participating in activities. The facility census was 70. Findings include: Interview on 05/16/24 at 11:23 A.M., with Activities Director (AD) #51 confirmed the staff member did not have the certification, experience, or education required to be the director of the facility's activities program. AD #51 also verified they were not licensed or registered. AD #51 stated the facility would be providing the training for AD #51 to become a certified activities program director. Review of the personnel record for AD #51 revealed AD #51 did not have a certification to be an activities director or the appropriate training and/or education to hold the position of activities director. During an interview on 05/16/24 at 12:22 P.M., the Administrator…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide one (#71) of 17 sampled residents reasonable accommodations of needs and preferences to enhance the ability to perform self-mobility. The facility census was 70. Findings include: Review of Resident #71's medical record identified admission to the facility occurred on 04/08/24 with medical diagnoses including morbid obesity, congestive heart failure, high blood pressure, diabetes, and chronic kidney disease. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #71 was cognitively intact and required partial/moderate assistance with rolling. Review of Resident #71's physician orders dated 04/13/24 revealed an order for bilateral bed mobility bars to facilitate independence with bed mobility. Observation and interview with Resident #71 occurred in the resident's while the resident was in bed on 05/15/24 at 2:12 P.M. Resident #71's bed was observed without assist bars…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure one (#38) of five residents reviewed for advanced directives were consistent throughout the medical record. The facility census was 70. Findings include: Review of Resident #38's medical record identified admission to the facility occurred on 09/18/20 with medical diagnoses including congestive heart failure (CHF), edema, pain, morbid obesity, and diabetes. Review of Resident #38's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was assessed with moderately impaired cognition. Review of Resident #38's physician orders dated 03/25/24 revealed an order for the resident to be a Full Code (full life-saving measures in the event of cardiac or respiratory arrest) status for advanced directive. Review of Resident #38's current plan of care revealed the resident wished to have a Do Not Resuscitate - Comfort Care (DNR-CC; only comfort measures to be administered in the event of cardiac or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, resident and staff interview, review of self-reported incidents (SRIs), and policy review, the facility failed to ensure alleged perpetrators were identified in reports of abuse allegations submitted to the State Survey Agency. This affected one (#30) of two residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 70. Findings include: Review of Resident #30's medical record identified admission to the facility occurred on 08/08/22 with medical diagnoses including non-stemi myocardial infarction, anemia, hypertension, generalized weakness, depression, obesity, and hypokalemia. Interview with Resident #30 on 05/13/24 at 8:26 A.M. stated Stated Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #92 was rough with her care and she reported it to the facility. Resident #30 stated the facility did an investigation and asked her questions regarding the incident. Review of the facility's SRI submitted to the State Survey Agency on 04/09/24 identified an allegation of abuse was made by Resident #30. The facility reported the incident as required; however, the facility omitted STNA #92 as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interview, review of emergency medication availability lists, and review of an emergency medication policy, the facility failed to provide an as needed medication from the emergency supply for one (#3) of five residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 70. Findings include: Review of Resident #3's medical record identified admission occurred on 10/19/17 with medical diagnoses including asthma and bipolar disorder. Review the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 was assessed with no cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #3's nursing progress notes identified at 6:43 P.M. on 05/14/24 the resident requested a respiratory assessment be completed. The assessment completed at that time identified no concerns. Further review of the progress notes revealed a note dated 05/15/24 at 3:14 P.M. identified a nurse called the pharmacy and requested a refill of Resident #3's inhaled bronchodilator medication Ventolin inhaler…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors. This affected one (#59) of five residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 70. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #59 revealed an admission date of 08/03/23. Diagnoses included absence of right below the knee amputation status post gangrene, type two diabetes with hyperglycemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with acute exacerbation, major depressive disorder, unspecified dementia with mood disturbances, anemia, delirium due to psychosis. Review of the medical record and physician's order for Resident #59 revealed and order dated 04/22/24, that identified a change in dosage of the antipsychotic Abilify from two (2) milligrams (mg) to five (5) mg. The order was received and acknowledged by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #82. The order transcribed by LPN #82 on 04/22/24 was inadvertently discontinued. Review of Resident #59's medication administration records (MARs) for April and May 2024…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation in the medical record when wound care treatments, prevention devices, and supplement orders were administered. This affected one (#66) of two residents reviewed for wounds. The facility census was 70. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #66 revealed an admission date of 02/23/24 with diagnoses including displaced fracture of the left femur, diabetes mellitus, and anxiety. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #66 revealed an order dated 03/02/24 to cleanse the surgical site, staples, and sutures on the left hip with normal saline, pat dry, and leave open to air every night shift. Further review revealed an order dated 03/26/24 for the resident to have podus boots (boots used for heel pressure injuries) on when in bed as tolerated every shift for prevention, and an order dated 05/04/24 for house liquid protein twice a day for wound healing in the morning and at bedtime. Review of the medication administration record (MAR) and treatment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-06 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the medical director was an active participant of the Quality Assurance (QA) Committee. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Review of the facility's sign-in sheet for the QA meeting minutes for the meetings held in September 2023 and November 2023 revealed no evidence the medical director attended the meetings. Interview with the Administrator on 01/29/24 at 3:17 P.M. verified the medical director did not attend the QA meetings as required. The Administrator stated that the last QA meeting that Medical Director (MD) #391 attended was February 2023. A phone interview on 01/29/24 at 3:49 P.M. with Medical Director (MD) #391 revealed that he attended the QA meeting in February and that he runs a full-time clinic. MD #391 stated that since the meetings are in the middle of the day, he can't make it.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-02-06 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the facility provided a sanitary environment. This affected seven residents (Resident #3, #9, #43, #46, #54, #69 and #80) and had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Observation of the shower rooms on 01/22/24 at 6:43 A.M. with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #336 revealed the shower room on 200-Hall had dirty linens all over the floor and the trash was overflowing. The shower room on the 400-Hall had mold in the corner of the shower and on the shower chair. The toilet had brown paper towels in it and did not have a flushing handle. ADON #336 stated that that toilet is not in use, and the water is not turned on but there shouldn't be dirty paper towels in it. ADON #336 verified the findings at the time of the observations and verified that the shower rooms are both still being used by residents for their showers. Observation of the physical environment on 01/22/24 at 6:45 A.M. with the Administrator revealed the floor around Resident #3's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified when residents had a change of condition. This affected three residents (Resident #14, #49 and #69) out of three reviewed for change of condition. The facility census was 74. Findings include: 1. Review of the open medical record for Resident #69 revealed an admission on [DATE]. Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, chronic pain syndrome and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. The resident was dependent on toileting and needed assistance with repositioning. The assessment indicated Resident #69 had four stage 3 pressure ulcers (extend through the skin into deeper tissue and fat but do not reach muscle, tendon, or bone) on admission. Review of the admission nursing assessment dated [DATE] revealed a pressure ulcer to the right gluteal fold (right buttock) that measured 7 centimeters (cm) by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure its smoking policy was followed as written. This affected three (#2, #45, and #56) of three residents interviewed for smoking. The facility identified 14 residents who were smokers. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Interview on 01/22/24 at 7:05 A.M. with Resident #45 revealed that smoke breaks are always late, especially in the morning. Interview on 01/22/24 at 7:10 A.M. with Resident #56 revealed that smoke breaks are always late especially in the morning. Interview on 01/22/24 at 9:30 A.M. with Resident #2 revealed that smoke breaks are always late especially in the morning. Observations on 01/25/24 at 7:00 A.M. revealed Residents #2, #16, #45, and #56 were waiting near the designated smoking area to be taken outside for a supervised smoke break. Observation and interview on 01/25/24 at 7:28 A.M. with State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #400 verified that she came to take the smokers outside to the designated smoking area at 7:28 A.M. and that the smoking time was 7:00 A.M. STNA #400…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a system to preventing the spread of infections and communicable diseases for nine residents (Resident #5, #6, #12, #27, #59, #60, #67, #70 and #74) identifed as being on isolation precautions. This has the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Observations of the physical environment on 01/22/24 at 5:05 A.M. revealed isolation carts outside of nine resident rooms (Resident #5, #6, #12, #27, #59, #60, #67, #70 and #74). There were no gowns in any of the isolation carts. Additionally, two residents (Resident #59 and #74) did not have a sign posted on the door indicating vistors should see the nurse before entering. Interview on 01/22/24 at 5:40 A.M. with State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #352 stated there was not enough personal protective equipment (PPE) available. She stated she had gloves and masks, but had to go into isolation rooms without a gown because there were not enough available on her shift. Interview on 01/22/24 at 5:31 A.M. with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to provide routine bathing and grooming services for Resident #65 and routine bathing services for Resident #63. This affected two residents (#65 and #63) of three residents reviewed for provision of Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). The facility census was 74. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #65 revealed an admission date of 11/03/23. Medical diagnoses included wedge compression fracture of the vertebrae, muscle weakness, chronic pain, and a myocardial infarction (heart attack). Resident #65's listed shower days were on Mondays and Fridays. Review of Resident #65's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/09/23, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 which indicated intact cognition. Resident #65 was identified to be hard of hearing but did not use a hearing aide. Resident #65 required substantial/maximum assistance with toileting, showering/bathing, and dressing. Resident #65 was dependent for personal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive plan of care was developed to address a resident's communication barriers. This affected one (#15) of three residents reviewed for communication. The facility census was 73. Findings include: Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/15/23. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction (stroke) and bilateral hearing loss. Review of the admission Nursing Observation assessment, dated 09/15/23, revealed Resident #15 was alert to person, place and situation. She was observed to be verbally incomprehensible. There was no indication Resident #15 was deaf. Review of the baseline care plan, dated 09/15/23, revealed Resident #15 was deaf and had a hearing aid. No interventions for effective communication with the resident were identified. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/22/23, revealed Resident #15 had highly impaired hearing, had a hearing aid, sometimes understood staff and sometimes was understood by staff. Review of the care plan,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, review of a fall investigation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to implement fall interventions for a resident identified at risk for falls. This affected one (#74) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 73. Findings include: Review of Resident #74's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/21/23 and a discharge date of 10/31/23. Diagnoses included Congestive Heart Failure (CHF), legal blindness, chronic pain syndrome, and repeated falls. Review of Resident #74's baseline care plan, dated 10/21/23, revealed the fall section was not initiated and no interventions were implemented. Review of the fall risk assessment, dated 10/22/23, revealed Resident #74 was at risk for falls as he was legally blind, had balance problems while standing and walking, had decreased muscular coordination, was jerking or unstable when making turns and required the use of assistive devices. The assessment was silent for clinical suggestions for interventions. Review of the Medicare Five-Day Minimum Data Set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, facility policy review, and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, the facility failed to ensure a resident was placed on contact isolation and contact isolation precautions were followed when the resident tested positive for a drug resistant organism. This affected one (#8) of three residents reviewed for infection control. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #8 revealed an admission date of 08/15/22 with diagnoses including dementia and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) (diagnosed on [DATE]). Review of the nursing progress note dated 07/07/23 at 6:23 P.M. revealed Resident #8 had tested positive for MRSA. There were no orders noted for contact isolation. The nursing progress note dated 07/09/23 at 11:20 P.M. stated Resident #8 continued on an antibiotic for MRSA in the nares (nostrils). Review of the medical record including care plan, physician's orders, Medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interview the facility failed to ensure residents dependent on staff was provided showers/ bathing on regular basis. This affected three (#10, #20 and #40) of three residents reviewed for receiving routine bathing services. The total facility census was 62. Findings include: Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE], with most recent readmission on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #10 included non-pressure chronic ulcer of the left heel and mid foot, cirrhosis of the liver, hepatic encephalopathy, depression, type two diabetes, gout, and severe septic shock. Review of the 06/12/23 quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident is cognitively intact, had physical behaviors one to three days of the review period and required extensive assist from staff for personal hygiene. Review of the bathing documentation provided for Resident #10 for the last 30 days revealed the resident had documented bed baths on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and facility staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident at risk for pressure development had physician ordered pressure reducing interventions implemented per the order. This affected one (#10) of two residents reviewed. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE], with most recent readmission on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #10 included non-pressure chronic ulcer of the left heel and mid foot, cirrhosis of the liver, hepatic encephalopathy, depression, type two diabetes, gout, and severe septic shock. Review of the 06/12/23 quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident is cognitively intact, had physical behaviors one to three days of the review period and required extensive assist from staff for personal hygiene. The resident was coded as having a risk for pressure ulcers but not currently having any pressure ulcers. Review of Resident #10's physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-11-15 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of staffing schedules, review of Benefits Improvement and Protection Act (BIPA) daily staff postings, and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week as required. This had the potential to affect all 61 residents currently residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of facility staffing schedules and daily BIPA staffing postings dated between 10/01/22 and 11/08/22, revealed an RN was not present and working in the facility for eight consecutive hours on 10/02/22, 10/03/22, 10/08/22, 10/09/22, 10/10/22, 10/15/22, 10/27/22, 11/05/22, 11/06/22, or 11/07/22 (10 days). Interview on 11/09/22 at 9:54 A.M. with the Director of Nursing verified the facility did not have RNs on duty in the facility for eight consecutive hours on the aforementioned dates. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Master Number OH00137389 and Complaint Number OH00136346.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-11-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure expired refrigerated medications were discarded, monitor temperatures in the medication refrigerators, and ensure foods and drinks were not stored in the medication refrigerator. This had the potential to affect all 61 residents receiving medications stored in the medication refrigerator. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Observation and interview on 11/07/22 at 1:04 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed the facility had one medication storage room. Observation of the refrigerator used for storing medications in the medication storage room revealed a refrigerator temperature log posted on the refrigerator. The refrigerator temperature log was dated July 2022 and had four temperatures logged for the month of July 2022. The DON verified the temperatures of the refrigerator should be monitored daily to assure the temperature ranged from 34 to 41 degrees. The DON verified the refrigerator temperature had not been monitored since July 2022. Observation on 11/07/22 at 1:05 P.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-11-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a clean and sanitary kitchen area. This had the potential to affect all residents who resided in the facility and received meals from the facility kitchen. The facility identified no residents who did not eat from the facility kitchen. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Observation on 11/07/22 at 8:15 A.M. revealed the kitchen oven with large amounts of dark, sticky grease buildup on the outside and the inside. The inside oven windows were coated in grease and unable to see through the glass. The bottom of the oven had thick dark grease and the grates were coated in grease buildup. There were crumbs and cobwebs on the bottom shelf of the oven. The steam table revealed sticky dark grease dripping down the front of the steam table by the controls. A stand-up fan located by the doors of the kitchen blowing towards the steam table had dust coating the blades and the safety screen. The dishwashing room revealed six rubber mats that were sticky and had crumbs stuck to them. The floor of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-11-15 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility provided Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) quarterly meeting attendance sheets and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the Infection Preventionist attended QAA meetings at least quarterly. This had the potential to affect all 61 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the QAA attendance sheets dated 05/20/22, 06/15/22, 07/20/22, 08/19/22, 09/29/22, and 10/27/22 revealed there was no Infection Preventionist documented as attending any of the meetings. Interview on 11/09/22 at 2:18 P.M., the Administrator verified the Infection Preventionist was not present at the QAA meetings.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-11-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident and staff interview, policy review, and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidance, the facility failed to ensure infection control measures were followed related to hand hygiene and personal protective equipment (PPE). This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 61. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included heart failure, heart disease, anemia, and hypertension. Review of Resident #15's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively impaired and required setup assistance for meals. Review of Resident #15's physician orders identified an order dated 10/28/22 for contact/droplet precautions for exposure to Covid-19. Interview on 11/07/22 at 9:28 A.M., with Resident #04 revealed staff often wore their masks down below their nose and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-11-15 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Review of Resident #54's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/16/22 and discharged on 09/18/22. Diagnoses included COVID-19, atrial fibrillation, vascular dementia, epileptic seizures, wedge compression fracture of thoracic vertebra, and intracerebral hemorrhage. Record review of the nursing progress note dated 09/18/22 at 2:26 P.M., revealed Resident #54 was having seizures. Resident #54's physician was made aware and gave orders to send Resident #54 to the hospital. Resident #54 was transported to the emergency room. Interview on 11/08/22 at 5:01 P.M.,with Business office Manager (BOM) #302 confirmed Resident #54 nor her Representative received a written notice of discharge. Interview on 11/09/22 at 10:19 A.M., with Social Services Designee (SSD) #353 confirmed Resident #54 nor her Representative or the Ombudsman received a written notice of discharge for Resident #54. Based on medical record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide written notification for the reason for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents who were required staff assistance with activities of daily living were provided assistance with grooming. This affected one (Resident #45) out of four residents reviewed for activities of daily living. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure residents received showers as scheduled. This affected five (Residents #9, #18, #28, #44, and #49) out of five residents reviewed for showers. The census was 61 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #45's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic respiratory failure, dependence on supplemental oxygen, heart failure, macular degeneration, and long-term use of anticoagulants. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/07/22, revealed Resident #45 had moderate cognitive impairment and required one person assistance for bathing as well as limited assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-11-15 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 5. Review of the medical record for Resident #312 revealed Resident #312 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included heart failure, hypertension, long-term use of anticoagulants, anxiety disorder, neuropathy, peripheral vascular disease, open wound of right foot and left elbow, and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #312's MDS 5-day assessment, dated 10/05/22, revealed the resident had mild cognitive impairment. Review of the pharmacy Medication Regimen Review (MRR) for Resident #312, dated 10/08/22, revealed a pharmacy recommendation regarding a contraindication in administration of the resident's prescribed Plavix and Omeprazole medications. The MRR described an inefficacy of Plavix when co-administered with Omeprazole, listed alternatives to Omeprazole, and noted per the manufacturer there was an increased risk of bleeding with the co-administration of these two medications. Review of prescribed medications in the medical record for Resident #312 revealed there were no changes to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-11-15 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews, pharmacy regiment reviews, policy review, family and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications . This affected four (#04, #9, #11, and #18) of four residents reviewed for psychotropic medications. The facility census was 61. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #04 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, depression, psychosis, and bipolar disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #04 was cognitively intact and was independent for activities of daily living. Review of Resident #04's prescribed medications list dated November 2022 revealed the resident was ordered to receive Wellbutrin (Bupropion) 150 milligram (mg), once per day; Sertraline 100 mg, once per day; Risperidone 0.5 mg; twice per day, and Lamotrigine 200 mg, once per day. Review of pharmaceutical recommendations made to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-15 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff, physician and pharmacy interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5 percent. There were four observed errors out of 31 opportunities this resulted in a medication error rate of 12.9 percent. This affected two resident's (#01 and #310) out of three residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 61. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #01 revealed an admission date of 03/15/06. Diagnosis included constipation. Review of the physician order for Resident #01 dated 06/04/22 revealed an order for senna tablet 8.6 milligrams (mg) give one tablet by mouth in the morning for constipation. Observation of the medication administration on 11/08/22 at 07:29 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) # 403 did not have Resident #01's medication senna tablet 8.6 mg available for administration. LPN #403 verified the medication was not available and revealed she would check later to see if the medication may be located in the stock medication room.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-15 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide bed hold notification, at the time of transfer. This affected two (#21 and #54) of five residents reviewed for bed hold notice. The facility census was 61. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #21's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/08/22. Resident #21 was paying privately for their stay at the facility. The record revealed Resident #21 was hospitalized from [DATE] through 11/03/22. The record provided no evidence of written notification of the facility's bed hold notification. Resident #21 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Interview on 11/08/22 at 12:36 P.M., with Business office Manager (BOM) #302, confirmed she is responsible for providing resident/families bed hold notifications when they are transferred to the hospital. The interview confirmed she only sends these notification to residents whom are Medicaid payer source. The interview confirmed upon admission to the facility each resident is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-15 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan which included the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident. This affected two (#49 and #54) of 17 residents reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility census was 61. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #49's medical record revealed an admisssion date of 08/08/22. Diagnoses included: discitis, hyperlipidemia, chronic pain syndrome, cocaine abuse, alcohol abuse, dementia, psychotic disturbance, encephalopathy, malnutrition, lymphoma, and arthritis. Review of Resident #49's electronic and paper medical record revealed no evidence of a baseline care plan being developed. Interview on 11/09/22 at 9:54 A.M., with the Director of Nursing verified there was no baseline care plan developed within 48 hours of Resident #49's admission. 2. Review of Resident #54's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/16/22. Diagnosis included: COVID-19, atrial fibrillation, vascular dementia, epileptic seizures, wedge compression fracture of thoracic vertebra, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive care plan and include residents in care planning process. This affected two (#34 and #36) of 20 residents reviewed. The facility census was 61. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis included hypertension, muscle weakness, abnormal posture, dysphagia, disorders of bladder, glaucoma, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and obesity. Record review of the Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #34 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 of 15 (cognitively intact). Resident #34 required extensive assistance of two for bed mobility, total dependence of two for transfers, toileting, dressing, and supervision for eating. Record review of Resident #34's medical records revealed there was no documentation of a comprehensive care plan being completed within seven days of admission to include…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-15 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure discharge planning for a resident was initiated. This affected one (#110) of two residents reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of Resident #110's medical record revealed an admission dated of 10/13/22, with medical diagnoses including: stroke, failure to thrive, hypertension, COVID-19 and pain. Review of Resident #110's written plan of care identified no plan was in place for discharge planning. Review of Resident #110's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (MDS) identified in section Q: identified Resident #110 is an active discharge plan occurring for the resident to return to the community. The MDS identified a plan was occurring. Resident #110's record identified no plan could be located. Interview on 11/07/22 at 10:55 A.M., with Resident #110 confirmed she lived in her home in the community prior to admission with the assistance of her brother. The interview confirmed this is where she plans on returning to, but has not heard anything from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered skin assessments were completed. This affected on (#49) of one residents sampled for skin integrity. The census was 61 residents. Findings included: Review of Resident #49's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/08/22, with diagnoses included: discitis, hyperlipidemia, chronic pain syndrome, cocaine abuse, alcohol abuse, dementia, psychotic disturbance, encephalopathy, malnutrition, lymphoma, and arthritis. Review of Resident #49's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/15/22, revealed the resident was cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility. Review of Resident #49's physician orders identified an order dated 08/09/22 for weekly skin review every dayshift every Tuesday for monitoring. Review of Resident #49's plan of care, dated 08/26/22, revealed the resident was at risk of impaired skin integrity related to loss of skin integrity, edema, and nutrition. Interventions included evaluate skin integrity, and monitor for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to assess a resident after an accident, complete fall risk assessments after falls and ensure physician orders for were followed to not provide straws to a resident at risk for aspiration. This affected three (#18, #45, and #49) of four residents reviewed for accidents/ hazards. The facility census was 61. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #18's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included hypotension, muscle weakness, abnormal posture, other abnormalities of gait and mobility, and rheumatoid arthritis. Review of Resident #18's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/21/22, revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required the extensive assistance of one staff for transfers. Review of Resident #18's plan of care, dated 06/15/22, revealed the resident was at risk for falls related to unsteadiness on feet, and rheumatoid arthritis.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident meal intakes were consistently recorded/monitored. This affected three (#9, #30, and #38) out of 20 residents reviewed. The census was 61. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 11/09/21. Diagnoses included protein calorie malnutrition, dementia, altered mental status, and nutritional deficiency. Resident #9 had a physician's order, dated 11/23/21, for a regular diet with mechanical soft textures. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment, dated 08/30/22, revealed Resident #9 required supervision after set up for meals. Review of the care plan, revised 11/06/22, revealed Resident #9 was at risk for malnutrition. Interventions included to provide diet and supplements as ordered, monitor nutritional health state, monitor percent of meals consumed and record, and provide assistance to resident as needed. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) meal intake documentation from October 2022 to November 2022 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing and humidification was changed in accordance with the physician order. This affected one (Resident #36) of six residents reviewed for oxygen services. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of Resident #36's medical record revealed admission to the facility occurred on 09/05/22 with medical diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure, congestive heart failure, depression, anemia, morbid obesity, diabetes, high blood pressure, and pain. Review of Resident #36's physician order, dated 10/08/22, revealed an order to change pre-filled water bottles on oxygen concentrator and humidification weekly and as needed. Observation of Resident #36's oxygen concentrator and humidification on 11/07/22 at 10:29 A.M. revealed the date written on the bottle was 10/08/22. The oxygen tubing attached to the oxygen concentrator was undated. Review of Resident #36's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for November 2022 revealed a nurse had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-15 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, review of narcotic records, review of facility medication policies, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure pain medications were available and administered as ordered by the physician. This affected one (Resident #36) of two residents reviewed for pain. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of Resident #36's medical record revealed admission to the facility occurred on 09/05/22 with medical diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure, depression, morbid obesity, restless leg syndrome, pain, and diabetic neuropathy. The medical record revealed Resident #36 had a physician order for Lyrica (nerve pain medication) 100 milligram (mg) TID (three times a day), for pain and neuropathy, since admission. Interview with Resident #36 on 11/07/22 at 10:21 A.M. revealed Resident #36 stated the facility has not had her Lyrica in the facility since 11/04/22 and it still was not in the facility. Resident #36 identified this was the second time this had occurred since her admission to the facility. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-15 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to monitor a resident before and after dialysis treatments. This affected one (Resident #30) of one resident reviewed for dialysis services. The facility's census was 61. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #30 revealed admission date of 05/24/22. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease, with dependence on renal dialysis, diabetes mellitus, and hyperlipidemia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #30 was on dialysis treatments. Review of the care plan dated 09/02/22 revealed Resident #30 had potential for complications related to dialysis and end stage renal disease. Interventions included assess vital signs, check bruit and thrill every shift, and provide renal medications as ordered. Review of Resident #30's physician orders revealed an order dated 06/30/22 to monitor dialysis port site for infection and an order dated 07/19/22 for dialysis treatments on Tuesdays,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were available for administration, leading to missed medication. This affected two (Residents #21 and #9) of five residents reviewed for medication availability. The facility's census was 61. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #21's medical record identified admission to the facility occurred on 09/08/22 with medical diagnoses including; diabetes, left heel wound with osteomyelitis (infection), congestive heart failure, and high blood pressure. Resident #21 was hospitalized from [DATE] through 11/03/22 for a surgical intervention to the left heel wound. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #21 was alert and oriented with no confusion noted. Review of Resident #21's re-admission physician orders revealed orders for the following medications: HumaLOG KwikPen Solution Pen-injector (insulin) 20 units in the evening with dinner,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-15 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility administered an unnecessary medication to a resident, This affected one (#34) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Record review for Resident #34 revealed an admission date of 08/08/22, with diagnosis of urinary tract infection. Review of the nursing progress note dated 09/30/22, between 11:32 and 11:55 A.M., completed by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #346 revealed Resident #34 was confused and disoriented. The physician was notified and ordered a urinalysis with a culture and sensitivity test. Record review of the lab results for the urinalysis test for Resident #34 ordered on 09/30/22 revealed the urinalysis was collected on 10/04/22. Review of the physician order for Resident #34 revealed an order dated 10/05/22 for Resident #34 to receive an antibiotic Cipro tablet 250 milligrams (mg) by mouth two times a day for infection for five days. Review of the medication administration record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-15 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors and insulin as well as piperacillin - tazobectam was administered without error. This affected two residents (#14 and #310) out of three residents reviewed during medication administration. The facility census was 61. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 06/28/19. Diagnosis included type two diabetes mellitus. Review of the physician orders for Resident #14 revealed an order for novolog solution (insulin aspart) inject as per sliding scale subcutaneously every shift for sliding scale for blood sugar control. If blood sugar was 150 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL) to 200 mg/dL give four units, 201 mg/dL to 250 mg/dL give six units, 251 mg/dL to 300 mg/dL give eight units, 301 mg/dL to 350 mg/dL give 10 units, 351 mg/dL to 400 mg/dL give 12 units, 401 mg/dL to 450 mg/dL give 14 units, and 451 mg/dL to 500 mg/dL give 16 units. Inject 10 units subcutaneously three…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-15 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure medication therapeutic levels were monitored. This affected one resident (#09) out of 20 residents sampled. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #09 revealed an admission date of 11/09/21. Diagnoses included dementia without behavioral disturbance, heart failure, cardiac arrhythmia, and atrial fibrillation. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #09 had impaired cognition. Review of the care plan dated 11/30/21 revealed Resident #09 had congestive heart failure. Interventions included give cardiac medications as ordered, monitor signs and symptoms of heart failure to physician, and check for labored breathing. Review of the current physician's orders for November 2022 revealed Resident #09 had an order for 125 micrograms (mcg) Digoxin every 48 hours by mouth for heart failure. Resident #09 had an order for a Digoxin level monitoring…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-15 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to timely notify the physician of laboratory results. This affected one resident (#34) out of five residents reviewed for physician notification. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of the medical record review for Resident #34 revealed an admission date of 08/08/22. Diagnosis included urinary tract infection. Review of the nursing progress note dated 09/30/22 revealed Resident #34 was confused and disoriented. The physician was notified and ordered a urinalysis with a culture and sensitivity test. Review of the laboratory results for the urinalysis test for Resident #34 ordered on 09/30/22 revealed the urinalysis was collected on 10/04/22. Review of the laboratory results for the urinalysis with the culture and sensitivity test for Resident #34 ordered on 09/30/22 revealed the culture and sensitivity resulted on 10/06/22 with greater than 100,000 Escherichia coli (E-coli). The culture and sensitivity results printed to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-07-01 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of personnel files and staff interview the facility failed to ensure certified nursing assistants (CNA) received regular performance reviews as required. This had the potential to affect all 73 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the personnel file for CNA #1106 revealed a date of hire of 10/25/23 and there was no annual performance review. Review of the personnel file for CNA #1108 revealed a date of hire of 06/07/23 and there was no annual performance review. Interview with Human Resources Director (HRD) #415 on 07/01/25 at 10:59 A.M. verified there were no annual performance reviews completed for CNA #1106 and CNA 1108.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-07-01 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of personnel files and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure certified nursing assistants (CNA), who were hired for more than one year, had 12 hours of in-services annually. This had the potential to affect all 73 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the personnel file for CNA #1106 revealed a date of hire of 10/25/23 and there was no evidence CNA #1106 had 12 hours of annual in-services. Review of the personnel file for CNA #1108 revealed a date of hire of 06/07/23 and there was no evidence CNA #1108 had 12 hours of annual in-services. Interview with Human Resources Director (HRD) #415 on 07/01/25 at 11:25 A.M. verified there was no evidence that CNAs #1108 and #1106 had 12 hours of in-service annually. HRD #415 stated he received an email from Corporate Human Resources (CHR) #700 that stated all employees were scheduled a minimum of 12 hours of in-services in the program. HRD #415 stated he was searching for a report from the software. Interview on 07/01/25 at 1:37 P.M. with the Administrator and Regional Nurse #500 verified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-07-01 · tag F0582 — pattern
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview. the facility failed to provide the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) in a timely manner to the residents. This affected two (Residents #1 and #17) of three residents reviewed for NOMNC. The facility census was 73. Findings include: Review of Resident #1's NOMNC revealed the last covered day was 06/10/25. It was signed and dated on 06/09/25. Review of Resident #17's NOMNC revealed the last covered day was 06/12/25 and signed on 06/12/25. Review of the Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage notice was dated 06/11/25. Interview on 07/01/25 at 8:10 A.M. with Social Service Designee (SSD) #416 verified Resident #1 and #17 did not receive two days notice before the end of a Medicare covered Part A stay or when all all of Part B therapies were ending. SSD #416 stated he was not aware NOMNC required at least a two-day notice.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$15,593 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $15,593 — penalty dated 2023-12-27

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIONSTONE CARE — 24 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.7-0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 23 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
LIONSTONE HZ OPCO HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 01/01/2023
KAZARNOVSKY, SOLOMONIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER50%since 01/01/2023
STEIN, ABBAIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL50%since 01/01/2023
CUSNER, ADAMIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/27/2025
DEGYANSKY, JEFFREYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2020
GOLDISH, ELIEZERIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/09/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-23.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$219K
Related-party expense3% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 66%Medicare 7%Other / private 27%

This home reported $219K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$327per resident / day
operating cost
$9,929per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$264per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365837. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-01, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next