No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

The Convalarium Of Dublin

6430 Post Rd, Dublin, OH 43016 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 90 certified beds · (614) 981-4436 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (614) 981-4436 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0606) — cited Aug 2024Resident-funds citation (F0565)2 actual-harm citations1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$70,901 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0606), cited Aug 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (63) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $70,901 in federal fines (most recent 2024-03-25)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
6805 Avery Muirfield Dr Ste 100 · (614) 793-8351 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.3 mi
6805 Hospital Dr · (614) 336-0431 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
6700 Perimeter Loop Road
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
Stillwater<0.1 mi
6400 Post Rd · (614) 799-2300

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased2.3%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.6%6.2%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.7%0.4%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms36.8%30.1%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%3.2%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened1.6%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication17.5%25.5%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine89.3%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.6%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control26.1%21.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table1.6%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine54.5%75.6%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.6%24.9%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.9%12.9%12.0%typical

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 39 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

51.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
52.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.25U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 52.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 36% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF51.0%CMS range 34.8–66.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.1%CMS range 7.5–15.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge52.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge52.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge43.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.181.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.21
RN hours/ resident / day
0.88
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.89
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.98
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.97
RN hoursweekends
46.4%
Total nursing turnover
26.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 80.2 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.98 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.21 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.89 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.54 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.16 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.31 to 0.97 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-15)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2024-11-27)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

63 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 50 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY.Based on record reviews, staff and resident interviews, hospital record reviews, incident investigation reports, and policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure two staff were present during resident transfers and failed to utilize a mechanical lift for the transfer. This affected one resident (Resident #06) of three residents reviewed for mechanical lift transfers. Actual harm occurred on 04/30/26 when Resident #06, who required the use of a mechanical lift assisted by two staff members for transfers, was picked up by one staff member, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #206, and transferred from the shower chair to the bed. CNA #206 did not utilize the assistance of a mechanical lift and performed the transfer by himself. This resulted in an acute comminuted overlapping left humeral diaphyseal fracture and required hospitalization and surgical intervention to repair. The facility census…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, resident and staff interviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide a safe environment that was free from accident hazards and failed to complete a thorough investigation into a resident's fall. This resulted in Actual Harm for one resident when on 03/04/24, Resident #04 was attempting to enter the main entrance of the facility with an uneven surface transition causing Resident #04 to fall backwards out of his wheelchair sustaining a subdural hematoma (serious condition where the blood collected between the skull and the surface of the brain), retrolisthesis (backward slippage of one vertebral body with respect to the subjacent vertebra) of cervical vertebrae and a scalp laceration requiring three sutures. Additionally, a second resident (Resident #02) was placed at risk for the potential for more than minimal harm that was not actual harm when the cognitively impaired resident was not provided with adequate supervision when he was let outside…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2022-05-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interview, review of a fall investigation, review of hospital documentation, review of facility policy, and review of a MedlinePlus article, the facility failed to ensure Resident #16 received appropriate bed mobility assistance. Actual harm occurred when State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #500 was assisting Resident #16 with changing and bed mobility by himself and rolled Resident #16 away from himself which resulted in Resident #16 falling out of bed and sustaining a finger fracture. This affected one (Resident #16) of two residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 43. Findings include: Review of Resident #16's medical record revealed Resident #16 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic diastolic heart failure, muscle weakness, Type II diabetes mellitus, hypertension, contracture of right hand, left hand and unspecified joint, and gout. Review of Resident #16's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/06/22, revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were safely transported to outside medical appointments. This affected one (#66) of three residents reviewed for outside medical transportation. The facility census was 83.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #66 revealed an admission date of 01/09/25. Diagnoses included heart failure, hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease with heart failure and with stage five chronic kidney disease, Type II diabetes, anemia, end stage renal disease, obstructive and reflux uropathy, spinal stenosis cervical region, atrial fibrillation, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and dependence on renal dialysis.Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #66 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #66 had no psychosis, no verbal or physical behaviors, and no rejections of care. Resident #66 used a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure tracheostomy care procedures were followed as indicated during routine tracheostomy care. This affected one, (Resident #43), of four residents reviewed for respiratory care services. The facility census was 83.Findings include:Review of Resident #43's electronic health record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, encephalopathy, nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, Type Two Diabetes Mellitus, and tracheostomy status. Resident #43's electronic health record revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was unable to be calculated due to the resident's status of being rarely or never understood, though the resident's cognition was noted to be severely impaired as of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on 04/22/26.Review of Resident #43's physician orders revealed tracheostomy care orders dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, staff and resident interviews, and policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure accurate medical records. This affected one resident, (Resident #6), of six residents reviewed for medical record accuracy. The facility census was 83.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #6 revealed an admission date of 8/16/24. She had diagnoses including chronic congestive heart failure, hypertension, and generalized muscle weakness.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, did not have any hallucinations, delusions, or behaviors, had no range of motion impairment in upper of lower extremities and utilized a wheelchair for mobility. Resident #06 required substantial maximal assistance with toileting hygiene, showering, and dressing and was dependent for sit to stand, chair to bed and tub shower transfers. Resident #06 had no falls since admission. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-01-15 · tag F0680 — widespread
    Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of a written statement, review of an electronic mail (email) document, staff interview, employee file review, and review of a facility job description, the facility failed to ensure their activities program was directed by a qualified professional. This had the potential to affect all 80 residents who resided in the facility. The census was 80.Findings include:Review of the employee file for Activity Aide (AA) #517 revealed she was employed with the facility from 03/24/23 to 11/10/25 as the Activities Director. There was no evidence of her being licensed or registered by the state. She became an activity assistant on 11/10/25.Review of an email document from Corporate Representative #800 to the Administrator and AA #517, dated 06/25/25, revealed AA #517 was to enroll in a course to become certified with the National Certification Council for Activity Professional (NCCAP). The facility would reimburse her for any cost after completion.Review of a written statement from AA #517 dated 01/06/26 revealed she started to take the activities courses to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-01-15 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure equipment in the kitchen was operating correctly. This had the potential to affect all 70 residents who are served meals from the kitchen. The facility identified 10 (#13, #17, #10, #11, #3, #47, #49, #56, #1, and #68) residents who received nothing by mouth. The census was 80.Findings include:Observation and interview during tour of the kitchen on 01/07/25 from 11:08 A.M. to 12:30 P.M., with Dietary Supervisor (DS) #595, revealed while setting up the drinks for the lunch trays, [NAME] #599 was observed using the plastic scoop to break up the ice in the ice machine. Further observation of the ice machine revealed the ice was not forming cubes, but instead was dropping large sheets of ice into the bin of the machine. An employee had to physically break up the ice to fit into a drinking glass. DS #595 confirmed the findings from the ice machine at the time of the observation. Continued observation of the kitchen revealed the steamer had a metal tray sitting on the table directly under the doors with dirty water in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident and staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure shared glucometers were appropriately disinfected after use and failed to ensure staff wore required personal protective equipment while providing care for residents on infection control precautions as ordered. This directly affected two (#54 and #21) of two residents observed for infection control practices and had the potential to affect eight (#2, #42, #53, #8, #5, #82, #38, and #34) additional residents residing on the Blarney Stone Hall who utilize the shared glucometer. The facility census was 80.Findings include:1. Medical record review for Resident #54 revealed an admission date of 11/13/25 and medical diagnoses of respiratory failure with hypoxia, diabetes type II, metabolic encephalopathy, hepatic encephalopathy, cirrhosis of the liver, alcohol abuse, opioid dependency, insomnia, chronic viral hepatitis B, and chronic viral hepatitis C. Review of Resident #54's care plan last…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review, resident and staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide resident care following a meal to maintain dignity. This deficient practice affected one (#32) of three residents reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 80.Finding Include:Record review for Resident #32 revealed an admission date of 03/22/23. Diagnoses included of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the left non-dominant side, morbid obesity due to excess calories, aphasia following cerebrovascular disease, cerebral infarction due to occlusion or stenosis of the right middle cerebral artery, major depressive disorder, anxiety, bipolar disorder, vascular dementia, hyperlipidemia, chronic kidney disease, and lack of coordination.Review of Resident #32's care plan, last revised on 11/03/25, revealed the resident was at risk for activities of daily living (ADLs) performance deficit related to generalized weakness, decreased strength and endurance, and decreased activity tolerance, impaired mobility, and incontinence related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure psychotropic medications were not unnecessarily provided. This affected two (#5 and #8) of five residents review for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 80. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/05/25 and medical diagnoses of cerebral palsy, depression, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic respiratory failure, alcohol abuse, atrial fibrillation, and insomnia. Review of Resident #5's physician orders revealed an active order for the antidepressant, Lexapro five (5) milligrams (mg) with a start date of 11/14/25. Further review of the physician's orders revealed an active order for the antidepressant Zoloft 50 mg with a start date of 12/23/25. Review of psychiatric progress notes dated 12/26/25 and 01/02/26 revealed the plan for Resident #5's depression was to continue Lexapro 5 mg. No documentation for the Zoloft 50 mg order was noted in either progress note. Review of Resident #5's medication administration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident's comprehensive care plan was updated to include all interventions implemented by the facility to address nutritional concerns. This affected one (#35) of four residents reviewed for nutrition. The census was 80.Findings include:Record review for Resident #35 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, schizophrenia, and peripheral vascular disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #35 had impaired cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 08. The resident was assessed to require self-care and mobility assistance.Review of the care plan dated 11/05/25 revealed Resident #35 was at risk for malnutrition/alteration in nutritional status related to her chronic progression illness. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure adequate finger nail care was provided for a dependent resident. This affected one (#21) of one residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 80. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #21 revealed an admission date of 10/16/25. Diagnoses included atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, dysphagia, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the care plan dated 10/29/25 revealed Resident #21 was at risk for an activities of daily living (ADLs) self-performance deficit with interventions to eat with supervision or touching assistance, and the resident was dependent on personal hygiene. Review of Resident #21's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 12 indicating the resident had moderately impaired cognition and required set up assist with oral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 50 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to timely assess and implement treatment for non-pressure skin conditions. This affected one (#56) of three residents reviewed for wounds. The facility census was 80.Findings include:Review of Resident #56's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/02/25. Diagnoses included respiratory failure with hypoxia, cerebral edema, protein-calorie malnutrition, cerebral infarction, metabolic encephalopathy, hypokalemia, convulsions, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, peripheral vascular disease, and pneumonia. Review of the Resident #56's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was unable to complete the Brief Interview of Mental Status due to severe cognitive impairment. Further review revealed the resident was fully dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs).Review the Resident #56's care plan last revised on 11/19/25 revealed the resident was at risk for skin alteration related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer preventative interventions were in place as ordered. This affected one (#35) of five residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 80.Findings include:Record review for Resident #35 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, schizophrenia, peripheral vascular disease.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #35 had moderately impaired cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 08. The resident was assessed to require self-care and mobility assistance.Review of the care plan dated 11/05/25 revealed Resident #35 previously had a right heel pressure ulcer and was at risk for additional skin breakdown related to her immobility.Review of Resident #35's physician orders revealed an order dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of a risk assessment, resident and resident family interviews, staff interview, and review of an incident log, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation into a resident accident with injury. This affected one (#92) of three residents reviewed for accidents and injuries. The facility census was 80. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #92 revealed an admission date of 02/18/25 and discharge date of 03/04/25. Diagnoses included respiratory failure with hypoxia, sepsis, heart failure, heart disease, displaced fracture of the scapula, cognitive communication deficit, and muscle weakness. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #92 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 12 indicating moderately impaired cognition and required supervision and touching assist. The assessment revealed the resident had no falls since admission. Review of the plan of care dated 03/10/25 revealed Resident #92 was at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0778 — isolated
    Help the resident make transportation arrangements to and from radiology services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of a concern form, review of written statements, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure adequate transportation was provided to residents for outside appointments. This affected one (#96) of three residents reviewed for transportation to outside appointments. The census was 80.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #96 revealed an admission date of 10/03/24. Diagnoses included acute chronic systolic heart failure, type II diabetic mellitus morbid obesity, chronic respiratory failure, and major depression bipolar disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #96 was cognitively intact and was dependent on staff for toileting, showers/bath, putting on footwear, and turning side-to-side in bed. She used a wheelchair to transfer throughout the facility. Review of the nursing progress notes for Resident #96 confirmed she had multiple appointments arranged outside the facility. On 04/03/25,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, review of a concern form, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure dental services were provided in a timely manner. This affected one (#8) of two residents reviewed for dental services. The facility census was 80.Findings include: Review of Resident #8's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/01/25 and medical diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hemiplegia, congestive heart failure, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, dementia, unspecified hallucinations, and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #8's concern form dated 10/30/25 revealed the resident filed a concern form reporting that his teeth (dentures) were missing. Further review of the concern form revealed Resident #8's dentures were found broken and lodged in the toilet. The guardian was notified on 11/04/25 and indicated they would contact the dental company for Resident #8 to be seen by the dentist. Review of Resident #8's care plan dated 11/03/25 revealed to monitor and notify the medical provider as needed of signs and symptoms of oral/dental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident and staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide recommended eating equipment and utensils during meals as specified. This affected one (#21) of four residents reviewed for nutrition. The census was 80. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #21 revealed an admission date of 10/16/25. Diagnoses included atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, dysphagia, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #21 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 indicating moderately impaired cognition and required set up assist with eating.Review of the care plan dated 10/29/25 revealed Resident #21 was at risk for malnutrition or alteration in nutritional status with interventions for adaptive equipment as ordered, assist with meals as ordered, monitor the resident's ability to chew/swallow, and report changes to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident and staff interview, review of facility's infection control surveillance log, and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website, the facility failed to ensure proper personal protective equipment (PPE) was available for staff providing care for a resident (#24) with COVID-19 infection. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure a resident (#25) with known exposure to a COVID-19 resident followed appropriate guidance and physician orders to prevent potential spread of the virus. This had the potential to affect all 83 residents residing in the facility. The census was 83. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #24 revealed an admission date of 12/15/24. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic respiratory failure, type II diabetes mellitus, and pneumonia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #24 was cognitively intact required limited assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of facility policies and procedures, the facility failed to maintain sanitary food storage and preparation conditions. This had the potential to affect 55 residents who ate food prepared from the facility. The facility census was 79. Findings include: Observation of the kitchen walk in refrigerator on 11/25/24 at 8:38 A.M. revealed that a container that appeared to contain de-stemmed grapes, a container that appeared to contain shredded lettuce and a container that contained a small diced yellow fruit were unlabeled and undated on the refrigerator shelves. Interview on 11/25/24 at 8:38 A.M. with Dietary Manager #235 confirmed that three containers of food in the walk in refrigerator were unlabeled and undated. Dietary Manager #235 was unable to verify when the food items were initially opened. Observation on 11/25/24 at 8:43 A.M. revealed that there was approximately one inch thick of ice and snow like frost build up on the bottom left freezer when the walk in freezer door was opened. There were boxes of food with ice and frost on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-27 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, review of immunization records, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to educate residents on the risks and benefits and/or offer influenza vaccinations to residents as required. This affected five (Residents #42, #44, #61, #72, and #89) of five reviewed for immunizations. The facility census was 79. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #42 revealed an admission date on 10/29/24. Medical diagnoses included encephalopathy, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, type II Diabetes Mellitus with hyperglycemia, and morbid obesity. Review of immunization records revealed Resident #42 received the influenza (flu) immunization on 11/23/22. There was no further evidence Resident #42 had been offered the vaccination since admission. There was no evidence Resident #42 had been educated on the risks and benefits of receiving the flu vaccination. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #44 revealed an initial admission date on 05/13/23 and a readmission date on 09/23/24. Medical diagnoses included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-27 · tag F0887 — pattern
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, review of immunization records, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to educate on the risks and benefits and/or offer COVID-19 vaccinations to residents as required. This affected five (Residents #42, #44, #61, #72, and #89) of five reviewed for immunizations. The facility census was 79. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #42 revealed an admission date on 10/29/24. Medical diagnoses included encephalopathy, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, type II Diabetes Mellitus with hyperglycemia, and morbid obesity. Review of immunization records revealed Resident #42 received COVID-19 vaccinations on 03/04/21, 04/01/21, and 11/10/21. There was no evidence Resident #42 and/or the resident's representative was educated on the COVID-19 vaccination upon admission. There was no evidence the COVID-19 vaccination was offered to Resident #42 or the resident's representative upon admission. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #44 revealed an initial admission date on 05/13/23 and a readmission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to follow resident code status orders. This affected one (Resident #90) of one resident reviewed for code status. Also, the facility failed to follow physician orders regarding resident weight status. This affected one (Resident #44) of five residents reviewed for nutritional orders. The census was 79. Findings include: 1. Resident #90 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were congestive heart failure, muscle weakness, chronic respiratory failure, acute pulmonary edema, asthma, morbid obesity, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, anxiety disorder, insomnia, depression, hypothyroidism, osteoarthritis, and obstructive sleep apnea. Review of her Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed she was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #90's physician orders and code status form found she had a code status of Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) Comfort Care Arrest (CCA). Review of Resident #90's progress notes dated [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident medical record review, interviews with staff, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide proper wound monitoring for Resident #61. This affected one resident (#61) out of five residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 79 residents. Findings include: Resident #61 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure, protein calorie malnutrition, paraplegia, disease of spinal cord, tracheostomy, and person injured in a motor vehicle accident. Review of Resident #61's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that resident had four stage four pressure ulcers, all of which were present upon admission to the facility. Review of Resident #61's medical record revealed the resident was seen by the wound care nurse and wound nurse practitioner on 09/18/24 and measurements of his wounds were recorded. On 09/24/24, Resident #61 had a brief hospitalization and he was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 09/25/24, Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were not left at bedside. This affected one resident (#55) of one resident observed for medications left at bedside. The census was 79. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #55 revealed an admission date of 02/14/20. The resident was admitted with diagnosis of acute and chronic respiratory failure. Observation on 11/27/24 at 8:50 A.M. upon entering Resident #55's room, revealed the resident was asleep with bipap upon his face. The nightstand beside the bed had a pill cup with eight tablets of medications. There was not a nurse in the room at this time. There was a certified nurse aide who came into the room with his breakfast tray and the resident removed the bipap then grabbed at the pill cup to take them. The resident stated they were the pills from the night time. This surveyor asked the resident to wait until the nurse could come to the room to verify the medications. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #187 on 11/27/24 verified the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-27 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to prevent a medication error rate of less than five percent. There were two medication errors out of 25 opportunities, resulting in an eight percent error rate. This affected one (Resident #20) of six residents observed for medication administration. The census was 79. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #20 was admitted on [DATE]. Review of the physician orders dated 07/17/24 for Resident # 20 revealed an order for Tylenol 325 milligrams (mg), give two tablets every six hours for general discomfort and an order dated 09/30/24 for Morphine Sulfate oral solution 20 mg per 5 milliliters (ml) to give 0.5 mg by mouth four times a day and to give 0.5 ml by mouth every two hours for pain and short of breath. Observation of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #119 on 11/26/24 at 2:15 P.M. revealed LPN #119 prepared medications for Resident # 20 which included Tylenol 500 mg, two tablets and Morphine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-27 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview, resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to prevent significant medication errors. This affected two (Resident's #44 and #23) of five residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 79. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #44 revealed an admission date of 05/13/23 and a re-entry admission date of 09/23/24. Medical diagnoses include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), morbid obesity due to excess calories, type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy, and unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of Resident #44's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the physician orders for Resident #44 revealed an order for insulin glargine solostar subcutaneous solution pen-injector 100 unit, inject 45 units subcutaneously two times a day related to type two diabetes melluitus with diabetic polyneuropathy with a start date of 09/24/24.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record reveiw, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure catheter bags were stored in a sanitary manner to prevent infection. This affected one (Resident #20) of one resident observed for catheter storage. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) were in place for Resident #96. This affected one (Resident #96) of one resident observed for EPB. The facility census was 79. Findings include: 1. Resident #20 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinsonism, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, personal history of malignant neoplasm of prostate, and muscle weakness. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that resident had an indwelling catheter. Review of Resident #20's orders dated 06/17/24 revealed that Resident #20 had scheduled catheter and foley care monitoring on every shift daily. Observation of Resident #20 on 11/26/24 from 6:59 A.M. until 7:16 A.M. revealed that his catheter bag…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-09 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to notify Resident #21's family of a resident's fall in a timely manner. This affected one (Resident #21) of three residents reviewed for family notification. The facility census was 83. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #21 revealed an admission date of 08/15/23 with diagnoses of Parkinson's disease without dyskinesia, muscle weakness, and vascular dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment completed 09/26/24 revealed Resident #21 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #21's General Durable Power of Attorney (POA) form dated 04/20/23 revealed the resident's wife was the POA for healthcare and listed in the medical record as emergency contact number one. Review of the Resident Preferences Evaluation dated 08/26/24 revealed It is very important for the resident to have their family or a close friend involved in discussions about their care. Review of the incident report dated 09/28/24 revealed Resident #21 was exiting the restroom when he slid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, review of the facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered laboratory services for a resident were completed in a timely manner. This affected one (Resident #10) of three residents reviewed for laboratory services. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 10/20/22 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, diabetes Mellitus (DM) and dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed 07/18/24 revealed Resident #10 had a memory problem and had a diagnosis of DM. Review of Resident #10's physician orders dated 07/18/24 revealed hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) (a blood test that measures average blood sugar levels over the past two to three months) and basal metabolic panel (BMP) (checks the body's fluid balance and levels of electrolytes) every six months on the second Wednesday in August and January due to a diagnosis of DM. Review of the physician notes dated 07/18/24 revealed a new order received from certified nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of the facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to complete hand hygiene during medication administration to residents in enhanced barrier precautions. This affected two (Resident #24 and #70) of four residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Observation on 09/12/24 at 12:07 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #999 revealed prior to preparing medication for Resident #70, hand hygiene was not performed, and gloves were not worn. LPN #999 began preparing Resident #70's medication, directly from the medication card into the medication cup. LPN #999 then returned the medication card to the cart, locked it, and entered Resident #70's room, which had an enhanced barrier sign posted on the door. Resident #70 needed moderate assistance with medication administration, including spoon-feeding the medication with applesauce. Resident #70 took medications without difficulty. Upon exiting, hand hygiene was not performed by LPN #999. Observation on 09/12/24 at 12:15 P.M. with LPN #999 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-01 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — widespread
    Not hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, review of employee files, review of Bureau of Criminal Investigation (BCI) log, and policy review the facility failed to ensure background checks for staff were completed prior to employment. This affected three (State Tested Nursing Assistant [STNA] #230 and STNA #122, and Occupational Therapist [OT] #356) of the five employee files reviewed for background checks. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 81. Findings include: Review of employee file for STNA #230, revealed a hire date of 07/26/23. There was no documented evidence a background check was completed, and STNA #230 was not listed on the BCI background check log. Review of employee file for STNA #122, revealed a hire date of 07/29/22. There was no documented evidence a background check was completed, and STNA #122 was not listed on the BCI background check log. Review of employee file for OT #356, revealed a hire date of 07/26/23. There was no documented evidence a background check was completed, and OT #356 was not listed on the BCI…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-01 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, review of personnel files, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure performance evaluations were completed for State Tested Nursing Assistants (STNAs). This affected two (STNA #122 and STNA #230) of the four employees' files reviewed but had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 81. Findings include: Review of STNA #122's personnel file, revealed a hire date of 07/29/22. There was no documented evidence of a performance review being completed since being hired. Review of STNA #230's personnel file, revealed a hired date of 07/28/23. There was no documented evidence of a performance review being completed. Interview with the Administrator on 07/31/24 at 1:23 P.M., revealed the facility had no documented evidence that STNA #122 and STNA #230 had any performance evaluations completed. Interview with Human Resources (HR) #366 on 07/31/24 at 11:10 A.M., verified there was no documented evidence of any performance evaluations being completed for STNA #122 and STNA #230. This deficiency represents noncompliance investigated under…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-01 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, review of employee's personnel files, the facility failed to ensure State Tested Nursing Assistants (STNAs) received at minimum, 12 hours of training to ensure continuing competence. This affected two (State Tested Nursing Assistant [STNA] #230 and STNA #122) of the five employee's files reviewed. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 81. Findings include: Review of the STNA #230's personnel file, revealed a hire date of 07/26/23. There was no documented evidence STNA#230 received at minimum, 12 hours of training to ensure continuing competence. Review of STNA #122's personnel file, revealed a hire date of 07/29/22. There was no documented evidence STNA#230 received at minimum, 12 hours of training to ensure continuing competence. Interview with Human Resources (HR) #366 on 07/31/24 at 11:10 A.M. verified STNA #230 and STNA #122 and STNA had documented evidence they received at minimum, 12 hours of training to ensure continuing competence. This deficiency represents noncompliance investigated under…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-01 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to follow the prepared menu. This had the potential to affect all residents who received meals from the kitchen. The facility identified eight (#58, #59, #66, #72, #76, #77, #80, and #83) residents who did not receive meals from the kitchen. The facility census was 81. Findings include: Review of the prepared lunch menu for 07/30/24, revealed chicken Parmesan, cauliflower, garlic toast and tiramisu for dessert. Observation on 07/30/24 at 11:56 A.M., revealed the lunch trays for Unit One, with a test tray on an open cart left the kitchen. The last lunch tray was delivered to a resident at 12:46 P.M. and the test tray was removed. Observation of the resident's tray revealed mixed vegetables instead of cauliflower and there was no garlic bread or a substitute. Observation of the lunch test tray on 07/30/24 at 12:47 P.M., revealed the tray consisted of chicken parmesan, mixed vegetables and tiramisu for dessert. There was no garlic bread or substitute. Interview on 07/30/24 at 2:06 P.M. with Dietary Manager…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-01 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of mealtimes, staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure no more than 14 hours elapsed between the evening meal and breakfast. This had the potential to affect all residents who receive food from the kitchen. The facility identified eight residents (#58, #59, #66, #72, #76, #77, #80, and #83) who did not receive meals from the kitchen. The facility census was 81. Findings include: Review the facility's mealtimes revealed the evening meal was served on Unit One at 4:50 P.M., Unit Two at 5:10 P.M., and the dining room at 5:30 P.M. Breakfast was served on Unit One at 7:50 A.M., Unit Two 8:10 A.M. and dining room at 8:30 P.M. There was 15 hours noted between the evening meal and breakfast. Interview with Dietary Manager (DM ) #140 on 07/29/24 at 1:46 P.M, verified there were 15 hours between the evening meal and breakfast and there were no substantial snacks being offered. Interview with three Residents (#03, #05, and #68) on 08/01/24 at 9:11 A.M., revealed the time between supper and breakfast was too long. Residents (#03, #05 and #68) stated that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-01 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview, and staff interview, review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide scheduled showers/baths for residents. This affected two (#25 and #68) residents out of the five residents reviewed for showers. The current census is 81. Findings include: 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #25, revealed the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a re-admission on [DATE]. Diagnoses included diabetes, hyperkalemia, hyperglycemia, pressure ulcer wounds, and obesity. Review of Resident #25's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident had intact cognition and required staff assistance with bathing. Review of Resident #25's shower task worksheets completed by State Tested Nursing Assistants (STNAs) from 07/18/24 to 07/31/24 revealed the resident only had one shower documented on 07/29/24. Review of Resident #25's progress notes from 07/18/24 to 07/31/24 revealed no documentation of the resident refusing any care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-03-25 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe outside environment for the residents. This affected two (#04 and #50) of two residents reviewed for the physical environment and had the had the potential to affect all 82 residents residing in the facility. Finding include: Observation on 03/14/24 at 6:28 A.M. revealed there was an identified resident in a wheelchair with a neon yellow shirt on in the facility's parking lot. When you drive into the facility's property there is a driveway with pot holes and there was a parking lot to the left of the building. There several pot holes in the driveway and parking lot. There were orange cones noted on the sidewalk of the facility. Interview and observations of the main entrance, parking lot/driveway and sidewalk on 03/14/24 at 10:45 A.M. with Maintenance Director #115 revealed there were areas of hazards on the sidewalk marked with six large orange cones. Maintenance Director #115 stated some areas of repair had been completed, and some areas still needed to be repaired. The facility was working…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #15, who was status post brain surgery, received the appropriate care and services to attend to his scheduled neurologist appointments. This affected one (Resident #15) of three residents reviewed for physician appointments. The facility census was 82. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission date of 03/20/23. Diagnoses included acute respiratory failure, seizures, cerebrospinal fluid drainage device, hydrocephalus, and chronic pain. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #15's cognition was unable to be assessed. Review of Resident #15's after care visit summary dated 03/20/23 revealed Resident #15 had status post cranioplasty on 01/23/23 and had hydrocephalus (water on the brain) with shunt placement on 02/20/23. Resident #15 was transferred to another hospital on [DATE] for neurology evaluation and fever work up. On 03/20/23, Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-25 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #15 was provided with dental services. This affected one (Residents #15) of three residents who were reviewed for dental services. The facility census was 82. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission date of 03/20/23. Diagnoses included acute respiratory failure, tracheostomy, cerebrospinal fluid drainage device, dysphagia, anemia, and transient ischemic attack. Review of Resident #15's admission agreement dated 03/20/23 revealed the responsible party for Resident #15 signed an authorization form for Resident #15 to be provided with dental services. Review of Resident #15's care plan dated 04/03/23 revealed Resident #15 had the potential for oral/dental health problems having natural teeth in poor condition related to anemia, dysphagia, fluids/nutrition provided by gastric tube and tracheostomy. Individualized interventions included to coordinate arrangements for dental care and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interview, resident interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn when staff entered a COVID-19 positive rooms. This affected two (Residents #34 and #35) of three reviewed for COVID-19. Additionally, the facility failed to complete contact tracing during a COVID-19 outbreak. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Facility census was 76. Findings include 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #34 revealed an admission date of 10/24/23. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, COVID-19, respiratory failure with hypoxia, diabetes, and encephalopathy. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #34 was cognitively intact and required partial to moderate assistance for lower body dressing and hygiene. Review the progress note dated 01/31/24 revealed the resident tested positive for COVID-19 and was placed in isolation. Physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-07 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation related to sexual abuse. This affected one (Resident #100) of three residents reviewed for abuse. This had the potential to affect nine (Residents #35, #52, #80, #6, #7, #51, #2, #63 and #101) Maintenance Man (MM) #150 had contact with. Additionally, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of misappropriation. This affected one (Resident #65) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 79. Findings included: 1. Closed medical record review for Resident #100 revealed an admission date of 09/13/23. Diagnoses included bilateral trans radial amputation, Cystic Fibrosis, anemia, heart failure, pneumonia, diabetes, anxiety, depression, bilateral trans radial amputation, and respiratory failure. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #100 was cognitively intact. Her functional status was partial/moderate assistance for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-07 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident interviews, staff interviews, and record review, facility failed to ensure call lights were answered in a timely manner. This affected one (Resident #34) of one resident observed for call lights. Facility census was 76. Findings include 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #34 revealed an admission date of 10/24/23. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Covid-19, respiratory failure with hypoxia, diabetes, and encephalopathy. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #34 was cognitively intact and required partial to moderate assistance for lower body dressing and hygiene. Review of the plan of care dated 11/22/23 revealed Resident #34 was at risk for pain with intervention to encourage resident to call for assistance when in pain. The resident had an activity of daily living self-care deficit with interventions to use the call bell for assistance. Review the progress notes dated 01/31/24 revealed Resident #34 tested…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of sexual abuse was reported to the state agency in a timely manner. This affected one (Resident #100) of three reviewed for abuse. The census was 79. Findings included: Closed medical record review for Resident #100 revealed an admission date of 09/13/23. Diagnoses included bilateral trans radial amputation, Cystic Fibrosis, anemia, heart failure, pneumonia, diabetes, anxiety, depression, bilateral trans radial amputation, and respiratory failure. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #100 was cognitively intact. Her functional status was partial/moderate assistance for eating and toileting and she required supervision for transfers and bed mobility. The resident had impairment to bilateral upper extremities. Review of the investigation dated 01/03/24 revealed Resident #100 reported her cell phone was missing and blamed it on the Maintenance Man (MM)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-07 · tag F0675 — failed to support quality of life — isolated
    Honor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident interviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident's maintained quality of life while in COVID-19 isolation. This affected Residents #34 and #35 of two review for COVID-19 isolation. The facility identified seven residents (#3, #34, #35, #50, #59, #69) with COVID-19 positive diagnosis. Facility census was 76. Findings include 1. Review of the medical record for the Resident #34 revealed an admission date of 10/24/23. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, COVID-19, respiratory failure with hypoxia, diabetes, and encephalopathy. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #34 was cognitively intact and required partial to moderate assistance for lower body dressing and hygiene. Review the progress note dated 01/31/24 revealed Resident #34 tested positive for COVID-19 and was placed in isolation. Physician order dated 02/02/24 revealed an order for the resident to remain on isolation precautions until…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident interviews, staff interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure showers were offered twice weekly according to resident preference. This affected three (Residents #3, #35, and #55) of three reviewed for showers. Facility census was 76. Findings include 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed an admission date of 11/11/22. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, COVID-19, diabetes, acute respiratory failure, bipolar disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 was cognitively intact and required partial moderate assistance with ambulation and activities of daily living. Review of the care plan dated 02/05/24 revealed the resident required assistance of one staff for bathing. Review of the shower sheets from 12/05/23 to 02/05/24 revealed showers were only offered on 12/11/23, 12/14/23, 01/19/24, and 01/29/24. Interview and observation on 02/05/24 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-07 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident representative interview, staff interviews, and record review, facility failed to ensure dietitian recommendations were followed to maintain a resident's nutrition status. This affected one (Resident #55) of three reviewed for nutrition. Resident census was 76. Findings include Review of the medical record for Resident #55 revealed an admission date of 09/05/23. Diagnoses included osteomyelitis of left foot and ankle, anorexia, dementia without behaviors, cognitive communication deficit, traumatic amputation of left foot and vascular disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #55 was cognitively impaired and required two person assistance for bed mobility. Review of the care plan dated 12/23/23 revealed the resident was at risk of potential nutritional problem related to osteomyelitis with interventions to administer medications as ordered, monitor for signs of malnutrition and weight loss, obtain labs and diagnostic work as ordered and report to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-11 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, hospital record review, laboratory testing result review, and staff interview, this facility failed to implement Foley catheter care and maintenance orders and failed to change the Foley catheter per physician order prior to obtaining a urine sample. This affected one (Resident #2) of the three residents reviewed for Foley catheter care. The facility census was 81. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed and admission date of 08/03/23. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus, bipolar disorder, dependence on respiratory ventilator, and cardiomegaly. Review of Resident #2's hospital assessment and plan note dated 07/11/23 revealed under section 11. Foley status: present on admission, will need to be removed in 1-2 days. Review of Resident #2's handoff to skilled nursing facility provider note dated 08/03/23 revealed under section 11. Foley status: present on admission, patient refuses removal multiple times indicating Purewick's (a non-invasive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of video surveillance, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure direct care staff wore the required personal protective equipment while providing incontinent care for a resident in contact isolation. This affected one (Resident #1) of the five residents reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 81. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed and initial admission date of 11/17/22 and a re-entry date of 12/27/22. Diagnosis included chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia, bipolar disorder, PTSD, adjustment disorder with depressed mood, borderline personality disorder, and chronic pain syndrome. Review of Resident #1's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicating resident had an intact cognition for daily decision making abilities. Resident #1 was noted to reject care or evaluation.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-05-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to store and thaw foods in a sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect 41 out of 43 residents who received meals from the kitchen. The facility identified two residents (#8 and #38) who received no food by mouth. The facility census was 43. Findings include: 1. Observation on 04/25/22 from 7:14 A.M. to 7:30 A.M. of the reach-in refrigerator revealed a serving tray of cups filled with eight glasses of milk and three lemonades, a serving tray filled completely with individual cups of orange juice, and a third serving tray with six to seven additional cups of orange juice. None of the cups of beverages were dated. Interview with Dietary Supervisor #95 at that time of the observation confirmed the beverages were undated and Dietary Supervisor #95 stated they were probably poured today. 2. Observation on 04/25/22 from 7:14 A.M. to 7:30 A.M. of the dry storage room revealed two large bins filled with cheerios and bran flakes cereal which were undated, a bin of raisin bran cereal which was dated for 02/11/22 or 02/15/22,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-05-10 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of Resident Council meeting minutes, staff interview, resident interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to timely address and follow up on resident concerns expressed during Resident Council meetings. This affected seven (Residents #4, #14, #19, #20, #24, #30, and #32) of seven residents who regularly attended Resident Council meetings. The facility census was 43. Findings Include: Review of Resident Council meeting minutes dated 04/26/22, 03/25/22, 02/23/22, 01/25/22, 12/28/21, 10/28/21, 09/30/21, 09/08/21, and 07/22/21 revealed the residents had recurrent concerns of staff not wearing nametags, snacks not being passed, staff not checking their floors for dirty laundry, medication administration, requests for ice water to be passed more frequently, and call light response times. Residents #4, #14, #19, #20, #24, #30, and #32 attended the meetings regularly. Further review of the Resident Council meeting minutes revealed there was no evidence of any follow up from the facility staff regarding the resident concerns having been addressed. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-05-10 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide written notification of transfer to residents and/or resident representatives. This affected seven (Resident #2, #4, #6, #10, #16, #21, and #23) of eight residents reviewed for hospitalization and discharge. Additionally, the facility failed to provide written notification of resident transfer or discharge to the ombudsman. This affected eight (#2, #4, #6, #10, #16, #21, #23, and #42) out of eight residents reviewed for hospitalization and discharge. The facility census was 43. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and passed away on 04/26/22. Resident #6 had diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, quadriplegia, anemia, spinal stenosis, unspecified dementia, dysphagia, lymphedema, dysphagia, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, contracture of muscle of multiple sites, hypertension and anxiety disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-05-10 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide notice of bed hold policies to residents and/or their representative upon transfer to the hospital. This affected seven residents (#2, #4, #6, #10, #16, #21, and #23) of seven residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 43. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #6 revealed Resident #6 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and passed away on 04/26/22. Resident #6 had diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, quadriplegia, unspecified dementia, dysphagia, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, and anxiety disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #6 had severely impaired cognition. Review of the progress note dated 04/08/22 revealed Resident #6 suffered a fall and was transferred to the hospital. Review of the progress note dated 04/13/22 revealed Resident #6 had returned from the hospital. Review of the medical record for Resident #6 revealed no evidence…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-10 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the beneficiary notice worksheet, the facility failed to ensure residents received a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) prior to being cut from therapy services. This affected two (Resident #295 and #297) of three residents reviewed for beneficiary notices. The facility census was 43. Findings Include: 1. Review of the closed medical record for Resident #295 revealed an admission date on 10/23/21. Resident #295 discharged to home on [DATE]. Medical diagnoses for Resident #295 included COVID-19, Type two diabetes mellitus without complications, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (lack of oxygen), muscle weakness, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed Resident #295 had mildly impaired cognition. Resident #295 required extensive assistance from one staff to complete transfers, dressing, and personal hygiene tasks and required supervision from one staff for all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-10 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of Pre-admission Screenings and Resident Reviews (PASARR), the facility failed to ensure PASARR's were completed accurately. This affected two (Residents #2 and #10) of two residents reviewed for PASARR screenings. The facility census was 43. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed an original admission date on 11/13/21 and a readmission date on 01/04/22. Resident #2 had medical diagnoses with dates of 11/13/21 which included schizophrenia and anxiety disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2 had intact cognition and required extensive assistance from one to two staff to complete Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Review of Resident #2's PASARR screening dated 10/08/21 revealed the screening included mental health diagnoses of schizophrenia, suicidal ideations, and depression. Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed there was no evidence another PASARR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to timely identify and address resident pressure ulcers. This affected one (Resident #22) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 43. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed the resident admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including lymphedema, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and chronic pulmonary embolism. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #22 had intact cognition. Review of the plan of care revised on 01/07/22 revealed Resident #22 was at risk for impaired skin integrity related to generalized weakness, decreased strength and endurance, decreased activity tolerance, impaired mobility, chronic rashes, and diagnoses. Interventions included administering medications and treatments according to physician orders, encourage to reposition, monitor nutrition status, pressure reducing mattress, preventative skin care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-10 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, and review of a hospice binder, the facility failed to ensure residents with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services. This affected one (Resident #35) of one resident reviewed for range of motion. The facility census was 43. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #35 had an admission date of 12/30/16 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, type two diabetes mellitus, major depressive disorder, anemia, anxiety disorder, contracture of left and right knee, adult failure to thrive, dysphagia, and essential hypertension. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #35 was rarely or never understood. Resident #35 had limited range of motion on both sides of upper and lower extremities. Review of the physician's orders revealed Resident #35 utilized hospice services since 11/17/19. Review of Resident #35's physician orders, medication administration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident medications and wound cleansers were acquired from the pharmacy in a timely manner. This affected two (Resident #6, Resident #39) out of five residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 43. Findings Include: 1. Review of Resident #6's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, quadriplegia, anemia, severe protein calorie malnutrition, dysphagia, and dementia. Resident #6 was receiving hospice services. Resident #6 passed away on 04/26/22. Review of the Minimal Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #6 had severe cognitive impairment. Review of the care plan dated 04/22/22, revealed Resident #6 used anti-anxiety medications related to anxiety. Interventions included give medications as order by the physician and monitor for signs/symptoms of medication. Review of the physician orders dated 04/2022, revealed Resident #6…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-10 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician reviewed/addressed pharmacy recommendations in a timely manner. This affected two (Resident #4 and #22) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 43. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including lymphedema, dysphagia, polyneuropathy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anxiety disorder, irritable bowel syndrome, obstructive sleep apnea, hypertension, major depression, and chronic pulmonary embolism. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #22 had intact cognition. Review of the physician recommendation form dated 08/03/21 for Resident #22 revealed the pharmacist recommended evaluating sertraline (antidepressant medication) 50 milligrams (mg) every day and trazodone (antidepressant medication) 50 mg every night. This was not addressed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored properly. This affected two (Resident #22 and #242) out of four residents observed during medication administration. The facility census was 43. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 10/26/16. Resident #22's diagnoses included lymphedema, morbid obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dysphagia, chronic pulmonary embolism, and anxiety and depressive disorders. Review of the quarterly Minimal Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #22 was cognitively intact. Resident #22's functional status was independent to limited one person assist for all activities of daily living. Review of the physician ordered morning medications revealed Resident #22 was ordered Aspirin Enteric Coated Tablet Delayed Release 81 milligrams (MG), give one tablet by mouth in the morning, Celecoxib (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medication) capsule…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-10 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure routine dental appointments were arranged for residents. This affected two (Resident #15 and #21) out of three residents reviewed for dental services. The facility census was 43. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed she admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus, unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition, and encephalopathy. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had impaired cognition. Review of the plan of care dated 05/03/20 revealed Resident #15 had the potential for dental or oral cavity deficits related to having her own teeth. Interventions included assisting her with oral care as needed, completing oral assessment according to facility policy, and provide follow up with dentist as recommended. Review of Resident #15's physician's order dated 02/07/22 revealed an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-10 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate foods in order to honor resident preferences for a vegetarian diet. This affected one (Resident #30) out of two residents reviewed for food preferences. The facility census was 43. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #30 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebrovascular disease affecting left non-dominant side, type two diabetes, and hypertension. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #30 had intact cognition. Resident #30 was identified as being on a therapeutic diet. Review of the plan of care revised on 11/19/21 revealed Resident #30 was at risk for malnutrition and hydration deficits related to diagnoses, being on a therapeutic diet with supplements, and vegetarian food preferences. Interventions included monitoring nutritional labs, monitoring percent of meals consumed, monitoring weight…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$70,901 in federal fines across 5 penalties.

  • $45,429 — penalty dated 2024-03-25
  • $4,558 — penalty dated 2024-02-20
  • $4,178 — penalty dated 2024-02-12
  • $10,256 — penalty dated 2024-01-22
  • $6,480 — penalty dated 2023-12-26

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIONSTONE CARE — 24 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 51.7+1.3 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 23 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
LIONSTONE HZ OPCO HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 01/01/2023
KAZARNOVSKY, SOLOMONIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF50%since 01/01/2023
STEIN, ABBAIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF50%since 01/01/2023
CUSNER, ADAMIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/27/2025
DEGYANSKY, JEFFREYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2020
GOLDISH, ELIEZERIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/09/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-13.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$466K
Related-party expense4% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 22%Medicare 6%Other / private 72%

This home reported $466K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$429per resident / day
operating cost
$13,054per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$377per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365717. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next