No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Stellar Care Center

47045 Moore Ridge Road, Woodsfield, OH 43793 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 41 certified beds · (740) 472-0144 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Sep 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0744, F0758)2 immediate-jeopardy citations$227,850 in federal fines2 Medicare payment denials
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Sep 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (103) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $227,850 in federal fines (most recent 2025-09-22)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (62%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
37984 Airport Rd · (740) 472-0757 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
135 S Main St · (740) 472-1991 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
309 Guilford Ave
Park
105 W Court St · (740) 472-1328 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased5.4%5.3%15.4%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight11.2%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.6%0.2%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms100.0%30.1%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.8%3.2%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.5%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication29.4%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.0%3.4%4.7%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.3%21.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.8%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine69.2%75.6%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission28.7%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit28.4%12.9%12.0%worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.37U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.15hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.22hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 64% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.5%CMS range 6.7–17.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.921.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.00
RN hours/ resident / day
0.80
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.37
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.17
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.60
RN hoursweekends
62.5%
Total nursing turnover
54.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 41 beds and averages 34.7 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.17 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.00 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.37 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.37 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.16 to 0.60 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 62% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

16
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-28)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2024-11-07)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

103 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 90 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-09-30 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of hospital records, facility policy review and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive and individualized suprapubic catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder through a small cut in the lower abdomen (just above the pubic bone) to drain urine for resident's who can't pass urine normally through the urethra) care/interventions to prevent complications resulting in an acute change in medical condition and hospitalization. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and Actual Harm on 09/21/25 when Resident #05 was transferred to a local hospital and then life-flighted to a higher acuity hospital and admitted to the intensive care unit for treatment of sepsis and acute kidney injury secondary to a urinary tract infection. Prior to the hospitalization, facility staff failed to ensure Resident #05's orders for suprapubic catheter care, monitoring, and catheter changes were completed as ordered, documentation of care was accurate, and staff were knowledgeable on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-07-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed and open medical record review, hospital record review, review of patient handout information from Medscape.com, emergency medical services (EMS) records, policy review and interviews the facility failed to provide comprehensive, resident centered care to adequately manage and prevent worsening of cardiac conditions for Resident #50. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and serious life-threatening harm/death for Resident #50, who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a history of chronic heart failure, cardiomyopathy, ventricular tachycardia (with an implanted defibrillator), atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and hypokalemia (low blood potassium level) when the resident did not receive the correct physician ordered dose of diuretics or antiarrhythmic medications for his cardiac conditions upon admission to the facility. The resident also did not receive comprehensive, individualized care for his extensive cardiac history including monitoring for fluid volume overload (intake and output),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, hospital record review, facility policy review and interview, the facility failed to timely identify a decline in condition and obtain medical intervention for Resident #26 following an injury sustained because of a fall. This affected one (Resident #26) of four residents reviewed for skin conditions.Actual harm occurred on 04/04/26 when Resident #26 complained of pain and had a decline in the ability to transfer. There was no thorough assessment completed to ensure the resident was provided timely and necessary treatment/medical intervention because of this change in condition. On 03/27/26 Resident #26 had sustained an unwitnessed fall. Between 04/04/26 and 04/08/26 the facility failed to complete a comprehensive nursing assessment or physician notification related to the resident's pain and decline in functional status that was identified during this time. On 04/08/26 the resident's family requested an x-ray due to the resident's complaint of pain and decline in functional status. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY.Based on review of the medical record, review of the Self-Reported Incident, review of the facility's investigation, review of facility policy, review of staff education, review of facility plan of correction documentation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure licensed nursing staff appropriately wasted narcotic medications and failed to ensure legible and appropriate documentation related to narcotic administration and wasting. This affected five residents (#7, #10, #12, #18, and #20) of seven reviewed for abuse. Findings Include:Review of the Self-Reported incident (SRI) created 06/05/26 at 1:35 P.M. revealed during an in-house audit of narcotic records on 06/01/26 it was noted LPN #200 had not followed protocol for narcotic documentation for Residents #7, #10, #12, #18, and #20. LPN #200 had admitted during an interview that she was not following protocol by not wasting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · F2026-05-15 · tag F0836 — widespread
    Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the food license was renewed timely. This had the potential to affect 31 of 31 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 31.Findings include: Review of an email from the Administrator to Corporate Accounts Payable dated 02/12/26 revealed the Administrator sent the appropriate food license application to the corporate office and requested payment be sent to the local health department to renew the building's food service license.Review of a Food Service Operation License revealed it was issued on 03/06/26 and would expire 03/01/27.Review of an additional food license application revealed it was completed on 03/11/26 and had a late fee of $110.00 applied to the renewal fee. (The initial renewal application fee was not paid).Interview on 04/20/26 at 9:29 A.M. with the local health department revealed the facility went without a license for three days. The original license expired on 03/02/26 and the new license was issued on 03/06/26. The facility did have to pay a late fee.Interview on 04/21/26 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, policy review, and job description review,the facility failed to ensure professional standards of nursing care were provided when nursing staff did not verify and maintain a valid medical practitioner's order for the resident's clinical record prior to administering a controlled psychotropic medication. Although the dispensing pharmacy had a prescription for the medication, the facility did not have the order available or documented within the resident's medical record and medication administration record at the time of administration of the medication. This affected one resident (Resident #11) of four residents reviewed for medications. The census was 31. Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/09/23 and a re-admission date of 03/23/26 with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infraction affecting left non-dominant side, other schizophrenia, acquired absence of right leg above the knee, acquired absence of left leg…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, observations, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents did not exit the facility unsupervised, had elopement assessments completed as appropriate and fall interventions were in place. This affected three residents (Resident #5, #26 and #32) of three residents reviewed for accidents. The census was 31. Findings include: 1.Record review revealed Resident #32 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia and diabetes.Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment completed on 02/01/26 revealed Resident #32 had severely impaired cognition, wandered one to three days during the assessment period, and was able to walk 150 feet with supervision or touching assistance.Review of a care plan dated 02/25/26 revealed Resident #32 resided on a secured unit. The goal was to wander safely within her environment. Interventions included but were not limited to administer medications as ordered, ask resident to discuss how they feel about placement,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure weights were obtained as ordered. This affected one (#26) of one resident reviewed for edema. The facility census was 31.Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #26 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including weakness and hypertension.Review of a care plan dated 12/19/25 revealed Resident #26 had altered cardiovascular status related to hypertension, congestive heart failure (CHF), and myocardial infarction. The goal was to be free from signs and symptoms of complications related to cardiac problems through the review date. Interventions included but were not limited to give cardiac medications as ordered, monitor for edema and note extent/report to provider, and weight monitoring as ordered and as needed.Review of a Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed Resident #26 had mildly impaired cognition, had no behaviors, had a diagnosis of CHF, and had a weight gain while not on a physician prescribed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-15 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and policy review the facility failed to ensure residents did not receive psychotropic medications without an active order in the medical record. This affected one resident (Resident #11) of four residents reviewed for medication use. The facility census was 31.Findings include: Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/09/23 and a re-admission date of 03/23/26 with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infraction affecting left non-dominant side, other schizophrenia, acquired absence of right leg above the knee, acquired absence of left leg above the knee, anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder.Review of Resident #11's physician's orders revealed an order for clonazepam 0.5 milligrams (mg) twice a day as needed with a start date of 09/22/25 and an end date of 12/20/25. This was the only clonazepam order in the medical record.Review of Resident #11's controlled drug sheets for the medication clonazepam 0.5mg…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-15 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of pharmacy receipts, Pyxis spread sheet review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors when medications were not administered per physician orders. This affected one resident (#26) of three residents reviewed for anticoagulant medications. The facility census was 31.Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #26 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including weakness and hypertension.Review of a care plan dated 01/15/26 revealed Resident #26 was at increased risk of adverse reactions related to taking anticoagulant (blood thinning) medications. The goal was to experience no adverse reactions to the medication regimen throughout the review date. Interventions included but were not limited to administering medications as ordered, monitor skin for increased bruising and abnormalities, and obtain/monitor lab/diagnostic work as ordered and report any abnormalities to the medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, pharmacy receipt review, interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure medication administration was accurately documented in the medical record for Resident #26. This affected one resident (Resident #26) of three residents reviewed for anticoagulant medication. The facility census was 31. Findings include:Medical record review revealed Resident #26 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including weakness and hypertension.Review of orders revealed Resident #26 had an order in place dated 01/09/26 for Eliquis oral tablet 5 milligrams (mg) give two tablets (for total of 10 mg) by mouth two times a day for blood clots until 01/14/26. Beginning on 01/15/26, the order decreased to Eliquis 5 mg give one tablet twice a day. Further review of the physician orders revealed no discontinue date for the Eliquis.Review of a pharmacy receipt revealed the facility received an 80 count of Eliquis 5 mg tablets on 01/09/26 from their contracted pharmacy for Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure foods were stored under sanitary conditions. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The census was 36. Findings include:Observation on 01/20/26 at 8:38 A.M. during the initial tour of the facility kitchen revealed a walk-in white refrigerator. Upon entry to the refrigerator a foul odor was noted. Upon inspection under the shelf in the right corner a rotten apple, an old onion, open cheese slice, and an unidentifiable rotted item.Interview and observation on 01/20/26 at 8:48 A.M. with the Dietary Manager confirmed a foul odor was noted in the white walk in refrigerator and items including a rotten apple, an old onion, open cheese slice, and an unidentifiable rotted item were seen under the shelf in the right corner of the refrigerator.Review of undated facility policy titled Food Storage revealed food will be stored in an area that is clean, dry, and free from contaminants. All refrigerator units should be kept clean and in good working condition at all times.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-28 · tag F0887 — pattern
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to ensure residents, who had resided in the facility for over a year, were offered the opportunity to be vaccinated with the updated Covid-19 vaccine for the 2025- 2026 respiratory season. This affected four residents (Resident #4, #5, #33, and #36) of five residents reviewed for vaccinations. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #4's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), morbid obesity, adult-onset diabetes mellitus, nicotine dependence, and hypertension. Review of Resident #4's Vaccination Consent Form dated 11/12/25 revealed the resident was offered several different vaccines at that time to include Influenza, Pneumococcal, Shingles, Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV), and Hepatitis B. There was a place on the form to add other vaccines that were offered but that box was left blank and no additional vaccines had been added to the form as having been offered. There was no evidence of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 90 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, policy review, and staff interview the facility failed to document advance directives for a resident. This affected one resident (#2) of eighteen residents reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 36.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed admission to the facility on [DATE] for diagnoses including a stroke with left side paralysis, atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat), bilateral above the knee amputations, high blood pressure, anxiety and depression, schizophrenia (mental disorder with delusion thoughts and/or hallucinations), diabetes, and congestive heart failure.Further review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed no current order for code status. Review of discontinued orders revealed an order to discontinue full-code status on 10/27/25. Interview on 01/21/26 at 10:40 A.M. with licensed practical nurse (LPN) #38 revealed that Resident #2's code status should be listed under the orders screen in the electronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-28 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of beneficiary liability notices and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents and/ or their representatives signed the liability notices provided acknowledging their skilled services were ending for coverage under Medicare (MCR) Part A services. This affected two residents (#2 and #36) of three residents reviewed for liability notices. Findings include:1.) Review of Resident #2's liability notices revealed the resident's last covered day for MCR Part A services was on 09/05/25. Notice of non-coverage was documented on a Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) form 10123, titled Notice of MCR Non-Coverage (NOMNC) and was dated for 08/25/25. The form included a place for the residents or their representatives to sign acknowledgement of receiving that notice, but was only signed by two facility employees (Admissions Director #49 and MDS Coordinator #47), and not the resident or their representative. There was no documented evidence on the NOMNC of the resident or their representative having been notified their skilled service was ending or that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-28 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents with the diagnosis of dementia did not receive an anti-psychotic medication without an adequate indication for use. This affected two residents (#5 and #33) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include:1.) Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included unspecified dementia (moderate) with agitation and depression. Review of Resident #5's acknowledgement/ consent for psychoactive medications dated 02/15/25 revealed the resident's representative signed consent for the use of the Seroquel that had previously been indicated to be used for dementia with behavioral disturbances on a prior acknowledgement/ consent dated 03/30/24. The target behaviors it was previously used for included anxiety and agitation. The more recent acknowledgement/ consent form did not include a diagnosis or condition that warranted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident and/ or their representative was provided a transfer notice in writing and a bed hold notice at the time of a transfer to the hospital. This affected one resident (#1) of three residents reviewed for hospitalizations. Findings include:Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included a stroke, acute respiratory failure, and pneumonitis due to the inhalation of food and vomit into his lungs. Review of Resident #1's progress notes revealed a nurse's note dated 09/11/25 at 9:40 A.M. that indicated the nurse went into the resident's room to administer his medications and was unable to arouse the resident. He did not respond to tactile stimuli and remained unresponsive. The facility's Director of Nursing (DON) was notified and it was decided to send the resident to the emergency room. He was transported to the emergency room via squad at 10:05 A.M. The facility was asked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure accuracy of minimum data set (MDS) assessments for residents. This affected two residents (#3, #33) of 18 residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments. The census was 36. Findings include:1.Record review revealed Resident #3 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, cardiac pacemaker, type two diabetes, hypertension, and gastro esophageal reflux disease. Review of Resident #3 orders revealed an order to admit the resident to hospice active 11/20/24. Review of Resident #3 care plan completed 09/10/25 revealed the resident is receiving hospice services. Initiated on 09/10/25. Goals, include the resident needs, will be met with comfort and dignity through end-of-life services. interventions include coordinating care with hospice. Review of Resident #3 annual minimum data set (MDS) completed on 01/01/26 revealed a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 04 indicating…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure residents received complete treatment for infections including antibiotic therapy and failed to ensure physician prescribed weight loss treatment was completed. This affected two residents (#3, #17) of 16 residents reviewed for quality of care. The census was 36. Findings include:1.Record review revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, cardiac pacemaker, type two diabetes, hypertension, and gastro esophageal reflux disease. Review of Resident #3's annual minimum data set (MDS) completed on 01/01/26 revealed a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 04. Review of Resident #3's orders revealed an order to clean left index finger around the nail bed with IHWC, pat dry, apply triple antibiotic ointment (TAO) and cover with band aid daily until resolved. Review of Resident #3's orders revealed an order for Doxycycline hyclate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review the facility failed to ensure catheter care was completed for Resident #17, urinary outputs were monitored as ordered for Resident #27, and Resident #36 completed their full course of prescribed antibiotics for a urinary tract infection (UTI). This affected three residents (#17, #27, #36) of four residents reviewed for urinary catheters and UTIs. The census was 36. Findings Include:1.Record review revealed Resident #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including necrotizing fasciitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hyperlipidemia, insomnia, morbid obesity, and depression. Review of Resident #17's minimum data set (MDS) completed on 12/26/25 revealed the resident had an indwelling urinary catheter. Review of Resident #17's orders revealed an order to maintain 16 French (F) with 10 milliliter (ML) balloon catheter in place, to be changed every 30 days as needed to maintain patency. Review of Resident #17 record revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, resident observations, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate hydration for Resident #36. This affected one resident (#36) of two residents reviewed for hydration status. The facility census was 36.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #36 revealed admission to the facility on 7/28/25 for diagnoses including Atrial Fibrillation (an irregular heartbeat), congestive heart failure, contractures (stiffing of the joints preventing them from bending) of the bilateral hands and knees, Rheumatoid Arthritis, and dementia (impaired memory and cognition). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 quarterly assessment completed on 11/24/25 revealed Resident #36 required set up assistance and supervision with meals, was dependent in several areas including bathing, dressing, toileting, and utilized a specialized wheelchair to be pushed by staff. Further review of the MDS assessment for Resident #36 revealed a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 3/15 indicating significant cognitive impairment.Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure residents received necessary respiratory care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice and the residents care plan. This affected two residents (#10, #17) of three residents reviewed for respiratory care. The census was 36.Findings include:1.Record review revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, metabolic encephalopathy, type 2 diabetes, heart failure, hypertension, and acute kidney failure. Review of Resident #10's orders revealed an order for oxygen (O2) at 2-4 liters (L) per nasal cannula (NC) to maintain oxygen saturation above 90% as needed for shortness of breath and low oxygen saturations (sats), active as of 11/28/25. Review of Resident #10's admission minimum data set (MDS) completed 12/01/25 revealed a brief interview for mental status score of 03 and the resident required oxygen therapy.Review of Resident #10's admission care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-28 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, review of facility contracts and personnel files, the facility failed to provide administration of an intravenous (IV) medication by a competent licensed nurse to Resident #38. This affected one resident (#38) of two residents reviewed for IV medications. The facility census was 36.Findings include:Record review of Resident #38 revealed admission to the facility on 1/13/26 for diagnoses of post operative wound infection with central line placement for intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy, diabetes, liver disease, high blood pressure, anemia (low blood count), depression, and history of stroke. Further review of the medical record for Resident #38 revealed an order written on 01/13/26 for cefepime hcl (antibiotic used for wound infection) 2 grams (GM) in 100 milliliters (ml) normal saline to be administered three times a day intravenously through 02/20/26.Review of the medical record for Resident #38 revealed a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) was placed in the residents right upper arm while in the hospital prior to admission to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-28 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations that identified irregularities during monthly medication regimen reviews were appropriately addressed by the physician/ nurse practitioner and/ responded to timely. This affected two residents (#5, #33) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of unspecified dementia (moderate) with agitation and depression. Review of Resident #5's monthly medication regimen reviews revealed the resident's medications were reviewed monthly by the consulting pharmacist to identify any irregularities in his medication regimen. Irregularities were noted during two of the 11 months reviewed. Review of Resident #5's pharmacy recommendations revealed the pharmacist noted an irregularity when reviewing the resident's medications on 04/17/25. The pharmacist indicated the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-28 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to obtain ordered laboratory tests and report results to provider for one resident. This affected one resident (#36) of one resident reviewed for laboratory services. The facility census was 36.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #36 revealed admission to the facility on 7/28/25 for diagnoses including atrial fibrillation (an irregular heartbeat), congestive heart failure, contractures (stiffening of the joints preventing them from bending) of the bilateral hands and knees, rheumatoid arthritis, and dementia (impaired memory and cognition). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 quarterly assessment completed on 11/24/25 revealed Resident #36 was dependent in several areas including bathing, dressing, toileting, and utilized a specialized wheelchair to be pushed by staff. Further review of the MDS assessment for Resident #36 revealed a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 3/15 indicating significant cognitive impairment.Review of Resident #36's provider orders revealed she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, review of medical records, and facility policies and procedures review, the facility failed to follow infection control practices to prevent the spread of infection. This affected one resident (#38) of five residents reviewed for medication administration and one resident (#10) of one resident reviewed for transmission-based precautions. The facility census was 36.Findings include:1.Record review of Resident #38 revealed admission to the facility on 1/13/26 for diagnoses of post operative wound infection with central line placement for intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy, diabetes, liver disease, high blood pressure, anemia (low blood count), depression, and history of stroke. Further review of the medical record for Resident #38 revealed an order written on 01/13/26 for cefepime hcl (antibiotic used for wound infection) 2 grams (GM) in 100 milliliters (ml) normal saline to be administered three times a day intravenously through 02/20/26. Review of the medical record for Resident #38 revealed a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the facility's infection control logs, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident, who was admitted to the facility on an antibiotic medication, was reviewed to ensure there were laboratory tests that supported the use of an antibiotic to treat a urinary tract infection (UTI), and the resident met criteria under the facility's antibiotic stewardship program for such treatment. This affected one resident (#48) of five residents reviewed for UTI's. Findings include: Review of Resident #48's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a stroke affecting her right dominant side, adult onset diabetes mellitus, and a urinary tract infection. Review of Resident #48's hospital records for her hospital stay prior to her admission into the facility on [DATE] revealed an After Visit Summary (AVS) dated 11/05/25 that revealed the resident was diagnosed with acute…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-09-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — widespread
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility billing/financial information, review of the Facility Assessment, and interview the facility neglected to operate in a manner to ensure all bills were being paid in a timely manner to prevent potential interruption in services. This had the potential to affect all 35 residents residing in the facility.Findings include:Although there was no evidence of any current shut-off for services at the time of the investigation, the risk for interruption of services was identified. The facility failed to provide evidence of fund availability and systems in place to ensure bills/invoices were paid timely and as due. Review of the following vendor/suppliers invoices/billing documentation and interviews completed as part of the State agency investigation revealed the following facility financial solvency concerns included but not limited to: Review of an invoice from the State Fire Marshal revealed an amount of $50 was due on 09/03/23 related to an inspection completed on 07/20/23.Review of an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-30 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — widespread
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, review of the activity calendar and job description review, the facility failed to assess and meet the activity needs of residents. This affected all 35 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of activity calendars dated April 2025 through September 2025 revealed on Sundays, Tuesdays, Thursdays, Fridays and Saturdays, the first two activities of the day are beverage cart and sit and chat. The third activity on Sunday is church, and throughout the rest of the days the third activity is a game of some sort. On Mondays from 8:30 A.M. to 3:30 P.M., beauty shop was listed as the activity and either resident council at 2:00 P.M. or movies in the evening at 6:00 P.M. There were no other days with activities in the evenings. On Wednesdays, from 8:00 A.M. to 11:00 A.M. was resident shopping and at 2:00 P.M. was cards. Observation on 09/15/26 at 1:26 P.M. during resident council meeting, the council stated they would like to have some more activities.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-30 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility assessment tool, the facility failed to ensure sufficiency nursing staff was available to provide timely and appropriate nursing and nursing-related services to residents. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 35. Findings include: Interview on 09/15/25 at 8:19 A.M. with anonymous staff member #170 revealed there were a lot of times where Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) were on the floor by themselves, and on the weekends the facility had a lot of staff call off. Anonymous staff member #170 reported there were not enough CNAs to care for the residents as there were so many residents who were completely dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). The staff member continued that a lot of tasks and care for residents, such as bathing and oral care could not be completed in a timely manner, and feeding assistance provided to residents was rushed due to a lack of staff. Anonymous staff member #170 reported call lights take a long time to answer as the limited…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-09-30 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — widespread
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide specialized memory care services as advertised. This affected seven residents (#10, #14, #20, #25, #26, #29, and #35) of seven residents residing on the memory care unit. The facility census was 35. Findings include:Record review revealed Resident #10 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including paranoid schizophrenia and major depression. Record review revealed Resident #14 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia and major depression. Record review revealed Resident #20 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia and depression. Record review revealed Resident #25 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease and anxiety disorder. Record review revealed Resident #26 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including depression and dementia. Record review revealed Resident #29 admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-09-30 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the Administrator job description, review of vendor invoices, and interviews, the facility failed to have systems in place to ensure it was administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Additionally, based on observation, interviews, review of dietary schedules and the facility assessment, the facility administration failed to ensure the facility employed sufficient dietary staff in accordance with the facility assessment. This affected 35 of 35 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 35. Findings include:1.Review of an invoice from the Fire Marshal revealed an amount of $50 was due on 09/03/23 related to an inspection completed on 07/20/23. Review of an invoice from the Fire Marshal revealed an amount of $75 was due on 09/30/23 related to an inspection completed on 08/16/23. Review of an invoice from the Fire Marshal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-09-30 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the Facility Assessment, interviews, record reviews, and observations the facility failed to conduct an accurate and thorough facility assessment to determine appropriate resources were available to provide necessary care and services the residents required during both day-to-day operations and emergencies, including nights and weekends. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 35.Findings include: Review of [NAME] Care Center Resident Analyzer and Resident Minimum Data Set (MDS) information revealed there were 15 residents (Residents #3, #5, #7, #9, #10, #20, #22, #24 #23, #25, #26, #30, #31, #33, and #34) who were dependent on staff for toileting . Review of [NAME] Care Center Resident Analyzer and Resident Minimum Data Set (MDS) information revealed there were 14 residents (Residents #3 , #4, #5, #6, #9, #10, #22, #24, #25, #26, #30, #31, #33, and #34) who were dependent on staff for dressing . Review of [NAME] Care Center Resident Analyzer and Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, they facility failed to ensure residents received comprehensive, resident centered care related to skin assessments, supplement orders, physician orders and physician notification related to weight gain. This affected four residents (Resident #5, #30, #8 and #24) of 24 residents reviewed for quality care. The census was 35. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #05 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus, hypertension, vitamin D deficiency, vitamin B deficiency, hyperlipidemia, gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), neuromuscular bladder dysfunction, and benign prostatic hyperplasia. a. Record review of Resident #05 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 08/01/25 revealed a brief interview for mental status score (BIMS) of 08, and has no exhibited or displayed behaviors. MDS revealed Resident #5 had Moisture related skin damage (MASD) , had a pressure reducing device for bed and chair, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, review of facility policy, and material safety data sheet (MSDS) review, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place for Resident #26 and failed to ensure a post-fall assessment was completed after Resident #27's unwitnessed fall. This affected two residents (Resident #26 and Resident #27) out of five residents reviewed for falls. Additionally, the facility failed to properly store hazardous chemicals. This had the potential to affect seven residents (#10, #14, #20, #25, #26, #29, and #35) out of seven residents residing on the memory care unit. The facility census was 35.Findings Include:1. Record review revealed Resident #26 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including major depressive disorder, dementia, hypertension, insomnia, anxiety, and vitamin D deficiency.Review of Resident #26's quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 01 indicating cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-30 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review and interview the facility failed to ensure comprehensive discharge instructions were provided and failed to ensure documentation of a discharge was located in the medical record. This affected one (Resident #27) of one resident reviewed for discharge process. The census was 35.Findings Include: Closed record review revealed Resident #27 discharged from the facility on 07/24/25 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, type two diabetes mellitus, cognitive communication deficit, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, heart failure, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, hyperkalemia, and insomnia.Review of Resident #27 Multidisciplinary discharge summary revealed Resident #27 was discharged on 07/24/25 to their home. Review of Resident #27 discharge summary revealed an incomplete discharge instructions with no evidence of education regarding diet or activities provided to Resident #27 or their representative. Record review revealed no documentation of a discharge note…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-30 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was completed within 48 hours of admission to the facility. This affected two (#8 and #27) of two residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 35. Findings include:1. Record review revealed Resident #8 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, and metabolic encephalopathy. Review of an assessment titled Care Conference Summary dated 09/16/25 revealed attendees included Resident #8, dietary staff, social services, activities, and therapy. The plan of care was reviewed with Resident #8. Review of Resident #8 ' s care plan revealed the dietary care plan was initiated on 09/15/25, but the rest of the care plan was not completed until 09/23/25. Interview on 09/23/25 at 3:05 P.M. with Administrator confirmed baseline care plans should be completed with 48 hours of admission to the facility. Administrator…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure showers were given to residents based on their preferences and shower schedules. This affected two (#24 and #28) of five residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). The facility census was 35. Finding include:1. Record review revealed Resident #24 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer ' s disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and hypertension.Review of a minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #24 had no behaviors and was dependent on staff for bathing.Review of a care plan initiated on 09/05/25 revealed Resident #24 was at risk or had an ADL self-performance deficit related to cognition deficit, impaired vision, and weakness. Interventions included but were not limited to use a mechanical lift and assist of two staff, dependent on staff for toileting, and dependent on staff for bathing.Review of a shower schedule revealed Resident #24 receives showers…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was administered under a physician order. This affected one (#8) of one resident reviewed for oxygen. The facility census was 35. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #8 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, and metabolic encephalopathy. Review of a nursing note dated 09/09/25 at 6:15 P.M. by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #8 revealed Resident #8 admitted to the facility by ambulance with oxygen in place at 2 liter per minute (lpm).Review of a Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed Resident #8 received oxygen therapy. Review of Resident #8's orders revealed there was no order in place for oxygen.Interview and observation on 09/22/25 at 3:57 P.M. with Resident #8 revealed she had an oxygen concentrator set to 2 liters per minute (lpm) and was wearing a nasal cannula. Resident #8 confirmed she had oxygen in place, and the tubing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-30 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive the treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive care plan, and the resident's choices related to pain management. This affected one (Resident #2) of one resident reviewed for pain management. The census was 35. Findings include:Resident #2 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including lung cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type two diabetes mellitus, brain cancer, weakness, chronic pain, and heart failure. Record review revealed an order placed on 09/10/25 for Tramadol 50 milligram (mg) (opioid pain medication) tablet one tablet by mouth every six hours as needed for pain. Record review revealed an order placed 09/10/25 for acetaminophen one tablet (analgesic) by mouth every eight hours as needed for pain of head, neck, and trunk extremities. Record review of Facility Audit report revealed Tramadol 50 mg was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-30 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received medically related social services. This affected one resident (#30) of one resident reviewed for psychosocial well-being. The facility census was 35. Findings include:Record review revealed Resident #30 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including major depression, anxiety disorder, and alcohol dependence in remission. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed on 08/09/25 revealed Resident #30 had mildly impaired cognition and no behaviors. Review of a care plan dated 08/21/25 revealed Resident #30 was at risk for a psychosocial well-being problem related to social isolation, depression and left side hemiplegia. Interventions included but were not limited to psych services as needed, allow the resident time to answer questions and to verbalize feelings and fears, and provide opportunities for the resident to make his own decisions. Review of a psychiatric note dated 09/10/25 by Nurse Practitioner (NP) #822…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident. This affected two residents (#30 and #2) of 24 resident's records reviewed for pharmaceutical services. The facility census was 35. Findings include:1. Record review revealed Resident #30 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), anxiety, major depression disorder, hyper cholesterol, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD), cerebral infarction, hypothyroidism, hypertension, constipation, and osteoporosis. Review of Resident #30's June 2025 medication administration record (MAR) revealed an order for Debrox Otic Solution (Carbamide Peroxide (Otic) Instill five drops in both ear two times a day for ear wax removal for three days, irrigate on the fourth day. From 06/11/25 through 06/14/25, Resident #30's MAR for Debrox was marked as 9 for other/see nurses notes. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-30 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received nutritive, palatable food. This affected two Residents (Resident #23 and Resident #28) of two residents reviewed for food. The census was 35.Findings include: 1. 1. Record review revealed Resident #23 admitted to the facility 12/10/24 with diagnoses including osteoarthritis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) , anemia, heart failure, urinary tract infection, and adjustment disorder.Record review of Resident #23's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed 08/08/25 revealed severe cognitive impairment, no displayed or exhibited behaviors, and the resident has an ordered mechanically altered diet and an ordered therapeutic diet. Resident #23 had a weight loss of five percent or more in the last month or loss of ten percent or more in the last six months and was not on a physician prescribed weight loss regimen. Record review of Resident #23's care plan revised 09/05/25 revealed the residents at risk for malnutrition/ alteration in nutritional status related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-30 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared in a form to meet individual resident needs. This affected two residents (Resident #5, and Resident #23 ) of two residents reviewed for food. The facility census was 35.Findings include: 1.Record review revealed Resident #05 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus, hypertension, vitamin D deficiency, vitamin B deficiency, hyperlipidemia, gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), neuromuscular bladder dysfunction, and benign prostatic hyperplasia.Record review of Resident #05's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment completed 08/01/25 revealed cognitive impairment, a mechanically altered diet and therapeutic diet. Review of Resident #05's orders revealed an order placed 12/08/24 for a low concentrated sweets diet (LCS), with mechanical soft texture.Review of Resident #05's care plan revealed a plan of care revised on 09/15/25 stating…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident records and documentation were accurate. This affected one (#5) of two residents reviewed with an indwelling urinary device. The census was 35.Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #05 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus, hypertension, vitamin D deficiency, vitamin B deficiency, hyperlipidemia, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, neuromuscular bladder dysfunction, and benign prostatic hyperplasia.Record review of Resident #05's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed 08/01/25 revealed a brief interview for mental status score (BIMS) of 08, and the resident had no exhibited or displayed behaviors. Resident #05 had an indwelling catheter, a suprapubic catheter. The resident had bilateral upper and lower extremity range of motion (ROM) impairment, used a wheelchair, and was dependent on staff or required maximal assistance for activity of daily living (ADL) care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were in place when a resident's catheter bag was oberved on the ground. This affected one (#9) of two residents reviewed for catheter care. The facility census was 35. Findings include:Record review revealed Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including quadriplegia, pure hypercholesterolemia, and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. Review of an order dated 02/28/25 revealed Resident #9 had an indwelling catheter with 18 french and 30 cc balloon in place to be changed every 30 days and as needed.Review of a care plan dated 08/08/25 revealed Resident #9 had severely impaired cognition and was frequently incontinent of bladder.Observation on 09/16/25 at 9:38 A.M. revealed Resident #9 was resting with his bed in a low position and his catheter bag was laying on the floor.Observation on 09/16/25 at 10:15 A.M. revealed Resident #9 was resting in bed and his catheter bag remained on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to maintain appropriate infection control practices during a wound treatment. This affected one resident (#14) of one observed for a dressing change. The census was 32. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #14 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including quadriplegia, diabetes mellitus, neurogenic bladder and peripheral vascular disease. Review of the electronic Physician Orders dated 04/17/25 revealed Resident #14 was receiving daily treatments including pressure ulcer treatments to an unstageable right hip pressure ulcer. The resident had an indwelling urinary catheter and was ordered enhanced barrier precautions (an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organism that involves the use of a gown and gloves during high-contact resident care activities i.e. residents with wounds or indwelling medical devices). On 04/17/25 between 2:19 P.M. and 2:58…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained free of accident hazards when medication carts and treatment carts were left unlocked and unattended. This had the potential to affect seven residents (#26, #27, #28, #29, #30, #31 and #32) residing on the locked memory care unit. The census was 32. Findings include: Medical record reviews revealed Resident #26, #27, #28, #29, #30, #31 and #32 were all severely impaired for daily decision-making and resided on the locked, memory care unit. On 04/21/25 at 8:07 A.M., observation with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #76 revealed the medication cart and treatment cart were unsupervised and unlocked at the nurses' station upon arrival to the memory care unit. Certified nurse assistant (CNA) #78 was observed in the dining room serving breakfast trays, and the medication and treatment carts were not within view of the CNA. There was no nurse or staff observed at the nurses' station at the time of the observation. Interview with LPN #76 at the time of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-21 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure required components of the comprehensive assessments were completed as required. This affected one resident (#14) of four residents sampled. The census was 32. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #14 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including quadriplegia, chronic pain, diabetes mellitus, neurogenic bladder, major depressive disorder and peripheral vascular disease. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident's Cognitive Pattern: Brief Interview for Mental Status and Pain Assessment interview were not completed as required. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the Pain Assessment interview was not completed as required. On 04/21/25 at 12:25 P.M., interview with Assistant Director of Nursing #85 verified the above. This deficiency represents an incidental finding of non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00164581.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans as required. This affected two residents (#23 and #33) of four sampled residents. The census was 32. Findings include: 1. Closed medical record review revealed Resident #33 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypertension, pancreatic disorder and colostomy. The resident was discharged home on [DATE]. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #33 was cognitively intact for daily decision-making, denied pain, his overall goal was to return to the community, there was no active discharge plan, no referrals had been made and the local contact agency was unknown. Further review of the record revealed no other MDS assessments were completed for review. a. Review of the Physician Orders dated 03/12/25 revealed Resident #33 was ordered routine Tylenol 650 milligrams three times a day for complaints of pain to the head, neck, trunk and extremities. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, policy review, wound dressing guideline review and interview, the facility failed to provide appropriate care and services to treat pressure ulcers. This affected one resident (#14) of one reviewed for wound care. The census was 32. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #14 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including quadriplegia, chronic pain, diabetes mellitus, neurogenic bladder, major depressive disorder and peripheral vascular disease. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #14 had no skin impairments. Review of the Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Ulcer Risk Evaluation dated 04/06/25 revealed the resident was at moderate risk for skin breakdown. Review of the nurse practitioner Skin and Wound Initial Evaluation dated 04/08/25 and 04/15/25 revealed three new facility acquired pressure ulcers including an unstageable pressure ulcer (full-thickness skin and tissue loss in which the extent of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-21 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
    Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure colostomy care was provided as ordered. This affected two residents (#23 and #33) of four residents sampled. The census was 32. Findings include: 1. Closed medical record review revealed Resident #33 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypertension, pancreatic disorder and colostomy. The resident was discharged home on [DATE]. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #33 was cognitively intact for daily decision-making and had a surgical wound. Review of the Physician Orders dated 02/11/25 revealed colostomy care was to be provided once a shift. Review of Resident #33's Treatment Administration Records (TAR) revealed the following: a. Dated February 2025 revealed colostomy care was completed on 18 of 35 opportunities. b. Dated March 2025 revealed colostomy care was completed on 53 of 62 opportunities. c. Dated April 2025 revealed colostomy care was completed on 24 of 30…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-21 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the facility's medication error rate was not 5 percent or greater. This affected two residents (#19 and #30) of three residents observed for medication administration with seven errors out of 26 opportunities resulting in an error rate of 26.9%. The census was 32. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #19 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic atrial fibrillation, cerebrovascular disease, hypertension, congestive heart failure and diabetes mellitus. Review of the electronic Physician Orders dated April 2025 revealed Resident #19 was ordered the following medications to be administered at 9:00 A.M.: glipizide (diabetes) 5 milligrams (mg), metformin 500 (mg), Eliquis 2.5 (mg) and Metoprolol tartrate 25 (mg). On 04/17/25 between 10:22 A.M. and 10:50 A.M., observation revealed Registered Nurse (RN) #100 prepared and administered glipizide (diabetes), metformin (diabetes),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy review and interview the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive and individualized pressure ulcer prevention program to prevent the development of pressure ulcers for Resident #13 and Resident #22. This affected two residents (#13 and #22) of five residents reviewed. The facility census was 32. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #13 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and altered mental status. Review of a care plan revised on 06/26/24 revealed Resident #13 required (staff) assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) related to dementia, heart disease and fatigue. Interventions included requiring extensive assist to total dependence from one to two staff to complete bed mobility and toileting, check incontinence garments every two to three hours, change per product recommendations and provide peri-care as needed. Review of Resident #13's assessment dashboard…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure foods were stored and served in a sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect 33 of 33 residents who receive food from the facility. Findings included: 1. Continuous observations during an initial tour of the kitchen on 11/04/24 from 8:29 A.M. to 8:44 A.M. revealed two cartons of cream with an expiration date of 11/01/24 in the walk-in refrigerator; an undated gallon Ziploc bag of beets, an undated Styrofoam container of leftovers, a bag of cookies dated 10/16/24, six undated cups of coleslaw, four undated cups of fruit, two undated bowls of salad, and two undated cups of dessert in the standing refrigerator; two 48 ounce jars of Dijon mustard with an expiration date of 10/20/24 and half of a five pound container of chili powder with an expiration date of 09/08/24 were in the dry storage area; and after running the dish washer four times, the machine would not heat past 175 degrees to the required rinse temperature of 180 degrees. Interview on 11/04/24 at 8:31 with [NAME] #537 confirmed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of facility invoices, the facility failed to ensure the facility floors, walls, air vents and rooms were maintained, clean, and free of insects. This affected five residents (Resident's #5, #24, #29, #30, and #32) out of 24 residents reviewed in the initial pool. The facility census was 33. Findings include: Observations and interviews on 11/06/24 at 1:31 P.M. with the Administrator confirmed the following environmental concerns: a. The tile and grout around the base of Resident #24's toilet was a discolored dark brown/black color. b. The air vent going into the bathroom of Resident #30's room was rusty. There was a hole in the wall above the baseboard on the right side of the door. The tile and grout around the base of Resident #30's toilet was a discolored dark brown/black color. c. The wall above the vinyl baseboard in Resident #5's bathroom was torn around the entire perimeter of the bathroom. d. Resident #32's bed was positioned long-ways against the wall. The wall had scraped drywall and paint removed in eight areas, all measuring…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #186 had an order in place for advanced directives and Resident #7's was listed correctly throughout the medical record. This affected two (#7 and #186) of two residents reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 33. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #186 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including displaced bimalleolar fracture of right lower leg, muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, hypothyroidism, and severe intellectual disabilities. Review of Resident #186's orders from 10/04/24 revealed there were no orders in place for the residents code status in the physical chart or in the electronic chart. Interview on 11/05/24 at 2:31 P.M. with Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed Resident #186 did not have an order in place for her code status until an audit was completed after being made aware of another concern with advanced directives. The DON stated there should have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) was accurate regarding a psychiatric diagnosis. This affected one resident (Resident #7) of one resident reviewed for PASRR. Findings include: Review of Resident #7's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/25/19 with diagnoses including major depressive disorder and unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition. Resident #7's care plan revealed care plans were in place for depression and psychosis. Review of Resident #7's PASRR documentation revealed only a PASRR document dated 05/24/19. The diagnosis for major depressive disorder and unspecified psychosis were not indicated on the PASRR documentation in section D of the document (indications of serious mental disorder). Review of Resident #7's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed in section A: Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of Resident #4's medical records revealed an admission date of 12/28/22 and diagnoses of cerebral infarction, atherosclerotic heart disease, hypertension and hyperlipidemia. Review of Resident #4's physician orders revealed an order for Eliquis (an anticoagulation medication used to reduce the risk of blood clots) oral tablet 2.5 milligrams (mg) with instructions to administer 2.5 mg by mouth two times a day related to cerebral infarction. Review of Resident #4's care plan revealed there were no care plans present for anticoagulation medications or for the increased risk of bruising and bleeding related to the medications use. Interview on 11/06/24 at 2:30 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified that there were no anticoagulation or risk for bleeding care plans present in Resident #4's medical record. Review of a policy titled Care Planning dated 08/2023 revealed the facility's interdisciplinary team was responsible for the development of an individualized comprehensive care plan for each…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, and review of policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure a dependent resident received assistance with bathing, showers, shaving, and oral care. This affected one (Resident #32) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The census was 33. Findings include: Review of Resident #32's record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia with behavioral disturbance, myocardial infarction, acute kidney failure, gastroesophageal reflux disease, Alzheimer's disease, muscle weakness, repeated falls, cognitive communication deficit, malignant neoplasm of bronchus or lung, chronic gout, and osteoarthritis. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) assessment, dated 10/10/24, revealed Resident #32 was moderately impaired for daily decision making, had difficulty focusing, was easily distractible or had difficulty keeping track of what was said, he had behavior fluctuations, had no rejection of care,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, family interview, staff interview, review of the facility assessment, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure activities were available for resident participation. This affected one resident (Resident #30) out of three residents reviewed for activities. The census was 33. Findings include: Review of Resident #30's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/14/23 with diagnoses including mild protein calorie malnutrition, abnormalities of gait, anxiety, vitamin D deficiency and alcohol dependence. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) assessment, dated 12/18/23, revealed it was somewhat important for the resident to listen to music, to do things with groups of people, to do favorite activities, to go outside to get fresh air, and attend religious services; music and bingo were a current interest, and watching movies were a past interest. The Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 09/06/24, revealed the resident was moderately impaired for daily decision making, had no behaviors, and utilized a walker. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure skin prevention interventions were implemented for a resident with a known pressure ulcer per the plan of care. This affected one resident (Resident #28) of one resident reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: Review of Resident #28's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included an unstageable pressure ulcer to an unspecified site, history of a right femur fracture, reduced mobility, muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, protein- calorie malnutrition, unspecified dementia, and adult failure to thrive. Review of Resident #28's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/17/24, revealed the resident had clear speech and minimal difficulty hearing, she was able to understand others and was usually able to make herself understood, her cognition was severely impaired and she had a functional limitation in her range of motion on one side of her lower…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure fall prevention interventions were implemented for residents at risk for falls. This affected three (Resident #5, #11, and #28) of five residents reviewed for accidents/supervision. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included mild dementia without behavioral disturbances, adult onset diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and osteoarthritis. Review of Resident #5's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/28/24, revealed the resident had clear speech, she was able to make herself understood, and was usually able to understand others. Her cognition was severely impaired and she displayed verbal behaviors directed at others 1 to 3 days over the seven day assessment period. The resident required a substantial to maximum assistance for going from a sitting to a lying position, lying to sitting on the side of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to adequately assess, monitor, and manage Resident #33's pain after a fall. This affected one (#33) of one resident reviewed for pain. The facility census was 33. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #33 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, hypothyroidism, anxiety disorder, and insomnia. Review of an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #33's cognition was impaired and she did not have pain. Review of a medication administration record for October 2024 revealed Resident #33 had an order in place starting on 09/19/24 for Acetaminophen tablet 325 milligrams take two tablets by mouth every eight hours as needed for pain. Review of a progress note dated 10/21/24 at 9:29 P.M. by Registered Nurse (RN) #512 revealed Resident #33 was found in her room at 5:45 P.M. laying on the floor on her back, was assessed for injuries and vitals were obtained. Resident #33 was assisted into…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure abnormal involuntary movement scale (AIMS) assessments were completed on a resident receiving antipsychotic medication to monitor for side effects associated with antipsychotic medication use. This affected one (Resident #5) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included mild dementia without behavioral disturbances, major depressive disorder, and hallucinations. Review of Resident #5's physician's orders revealed the resident was ordered to receive Seroquel 25 milligrams (mg) by mouth (po) every morning and 50 mg po every night at bedtime for hallucinations. The medication had been ordered since 09/03/24. Resident #5's medical record was absent for any evidence of the resident having an AIMS assessment (a 12 item rating scale used to assess the severity of abnormal movements in residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, review of the daily census, review of staff postings and staff schedules and review of the facility assessment, the facility failed to ensure adequate staffing levels to meet resident needs. This had the potential to affect all 33 residents residing in the building. Findings included: Observation and interview on 08/26/24 at 8:07 A.M. revealed there was only one State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #53 on the Memory Lane secure unit to provide care for ten (10) residents. The STNA verified she was the only staff member on the unit due to the nurse administering medication on the connected assisted living (AL) (located on the first floor and the memory care unit is located on the second floor). STNA #53 revealed she usually worked 6:00 A.M. until 6:30 P.M. day shift on the secured unit and the nurse always went to the AL first around 6:30 A.M. to administer medications, leaving her alone on the unit to provide morning care (incontinence care and assist residents with activities of daily living), assist residents out of bed for breakfast, pass…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a clean, safe, and homelike environment. This affected 25 residents (#2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #15, #17, #18, #19, #20, #22, #23, #25, #27, #28, #29, #30, #31, #32 and #33) of 33 residents in the facility. Findings include: 1. Observation of the environment in the second floor secured Memory Care Unit, 08/26/24 between 8:07 A.M. and 9:38 A.M. included: a. Toilet paper holders were missing from rooms 202, 204, 205, 208 and 211. b. room [ROOM NUMBER]'s door frame into the bathroom needed painted bilaterally from the floor up three feet due to the paint being scratched off. c. room [ROOM NUMBER] was missing a cover on the air conditioner. d. room [ROOM NUMBER] had drywall damage in the bathroom, a one and half foot by one foot area, was loose with a hole. The drywall was falling apart. There was a mouse trap underneath the heating/air conditioning unit. e. room [ROOM NUMBER] left of the bathroom door the molding lining the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-11 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure a resident's physician was provided accurate information regarding a discharge Against Medical Advice (AMA), and failed to provide the resident or resident representative with required documentation upon transfer. This affected two residents (#34, and #36) of three residents reviewed for transfer. The facility census was 33. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #36's closed medical record revealed an admission date of 07/01/24 with diagnoses that included aftercare following joint replacement surgery, moderate protein calorie malnutrition, depression, gastroesophageal reflux disease, polyosteoarthritis, osteoarthritis, dizziness and giddiness, artificial left knee, dementia, hypertension, unsteady on feet, and muscle weakness. The resident was discharged to another nursing facility on 08/14/24. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) annual assessment, dated 06/18/24, revealed the resident was moderately impaired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-11 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a discharge summary which included a recapitulation (concise summary) of the resident's stay at the facility, was completed. This affected three residents (#34, #35 and #36) of three residents reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 33. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #36's closed medical record revealed an admission date of 07/01/24 with diagnoses that included aftercare following joint replacement surgery, moderate protein calorie malnutrition, depression, gastroesophageal reflux disease, polyosteoarthritis, osteoarthritis, dizziness and giddiness, artificial left knee, dementia, hypertension, unsteady on feet, and muscle weakness. The resident was discharged to another nursing facility on 08/14/24. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) annual assessment, dated 06/18/24, revealed the resident was moderately impaired for daily decision making. Review of the medical record revealed the resident did not have a Discharge Planning form. The resident was given a Release of Responsibility for Discharge…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with edema was provided ordered medication for the treatment of edema related to the medical condition of congestive heart failure, skin ointments were applied for open skin lesions, weights obtained for a resident with edema, and intake and output assessed. This affected two residents (#21, #32) of three residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 33. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #21's medical record revealed a 02/27/24 admission with diagnoses including dementia with behavioral disturbance, vitamin B deficiency, osteoarthritis, respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic gout, localized edema, myocardial infarction, acute kidney failure Stage 3, hypertension, nutritional deficiency, hypo-osmolality and hyponatremia, acute and chronic combined systolic and diastolic congestive heart failure (CHF), Alzheimer's disease, muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and malignant neoplasm of unspecified part of bronchus or lung. A 05/28/24 Quarterly Minimum Data Set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to provide comprehensive pressure ulcer care timely and as ordered. This affected two residents (#14 and #26) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcer care and services. The facility census was 33. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #26's medical record revealed a 08/21/24 admission with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia and hypercapnia, ulcerative colitis, severe protein calorie malnutrition, hypertension, hypothyroidism, depression, restless legs syndrome, polyneuropathy, scoliosis, gastroesophageal reflux disease, lupus erythematosus and spondylosis of lumbar region. Review of the 08/21/24 admission note included the resident had a Stage 1 pressure ulcer (defined as intact skin with a localized area of non-blanchable erythema (redness). In darker skin tones, the PI may appear with persistent red, blue, or purple hues)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interviews the facility failed to ensure residents received physician ordered nutritional supplements for identified nutritional needs. This affected two residents (#26 and #32) of four residents reviewed for nutritional care and services. The census was 33. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #26's medical record revealed a 08/21/24 admission with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia and hypercapnia, ulcerative colitis, severe protein calorie malnutrition, hypertension, hypothyroidism, depression, restless legs syndrome (RLS), polyneuropathy, scoliosis, gastroesophageal reflux disease, lupus erythematosus and spondylosis of lumbar region. The resident was not due for a comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. Review of a Nutrition assessment dated [DATE] (1:59 P.M.) included the resident diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure respiratory equipment was maintained in a sanitary manner. This affected one resident (#19) of four residents observed for medication administration. The census was 33. Findings include: Review of Resident #19's medical record revealed a a 07/29/20 admission with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, cataract, anxiety disorder, depressive disorder, hyperlipidemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), hypothyroidism, gastroesophageal reflux disease, osteoarthritis, hypertension, vitamin D deficiency and insomnia. Physician orders included an order dated 12/28/22 for Albuterol nebulizer 0.63 milligrams (mg) and 3 milliliters (ml) inhale one vile via nebulizer every six hours as needed rinse mouth after each use. Physician orders included an undated treatment to change nebulizer set weekly and as needed for soiling on Sundays. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, manufacturer guidelines, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of five percent or less when the facility had 26 opportunities for administration with two errors resulting in a 7.69 percent medication error rate. This affected one resident (#19) of four residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 33. Findings include: Observation of medication administration on 08/26/24 at 8:38 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #42 revealed medications were administered to Resident #19. Oral medications were administered initially. At 9:13 A.M. the nurse returned to the resident to administer the first of two respiratory medications; Ventolin HFA Aerosol Solution micrograms (mcg) per activation (ACT) (Albuterol Sulfate HFA) two puffs inhale orally two times a day related to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was administered first. The nurse opened a new box of inhaler, shook it, held it to the resident mouth and activated the inhalation canister, asking the resident to breathe in. She…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure laboratory tests were obtained as ordered. This affected three residents (#3, #19, and #21) of four residents reviewed for laboratory testing. The facility census was 33. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #19's medical record revealed a a 07/29/20 admission with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, cataract, anxiety disorder, depressive disorder, hyperlipidemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), hypothyroidism, gastroesophageal reflux disease, osteoarthritis, hypertension, vitamin D deficiency and insomnia. Physician orders included a 01/28/24 order for a Basic Metabolic Panel (BMP), Complete Blood Count (CBC), Vitamin D, B12, and Folate levels every three months. A 04/01/24 physician order included a Hemoglobin A1C and Lipid Level every six months. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] included the resident was severely impaired for daily decision making, had COPD and shortness of breath.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-29 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, review of the daily census and staff postings, review of staff time punches/timecards, review of the facility assessment, review of resident notes, and interviews the facility failed to ensure adequate staffing levels to meet resident needs. This had the potential to affect all 37 residing in the building. Findings included: 1. Observation and interview on 07/10/24 at 7:24 A.M. revealed there was only one State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #173 on the secure unit to provide care for 10 residents. The STNA confirmed she was the only staff member on the unit due to the nurse administering medication on the connected assisted living (located on the first floor and the memory care unit is located on the second floor). The STNA confirmed she usually worked day shift on the secured unit and the nurse always went to the AL first to administer medications, leaving her alone on the unit to provide morning care (showers/incontinence care/dress residents), assist residents out of bed for breakfast, pass breakfast trays, and assist with resident meals.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-07-29 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the staffing schedules, timecard review, review of the daily census and staff postings, review of the facility assessment, and interviews the facility failed to ensure there was eight consecutive hours of Registered Nurse (RN) coverage seven days a week. This had the potential to affect all 37 residents residing in the facility. Findings included: Review of the staffing schedule dated 06/01/24 to 06/30/24 revealed on (Sunday) 06/09/24, (Saturday) 06/22/24, and (Sunday) 06/30/24 there was no RN scheduled to work. Review of the staffing time sheets, dated 06/09/24, 06/22/24, and 06/30/24, revealed there was no evidence an RN worked on 06/09/24 or 06/22/24. On 06/30/24, RN #113 clocked in at 6:52 A.M., however, there was no time entered for the end of the RN's shift that date. Review of the daily postings dated 06/09/24, 06/22/24, and 06/30/34 revealed no evidence an RN worked on those dates. Interview on 07/02/24 at 9:21 A.M., the Staffing Scheduler #102, confirmed there may be some days in June there was no RN coverage due to the facility only having one RN, at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-07-29 · tag F0837 — widespread
    Establish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, personnel file review, job description review, facility assessment review, time sheet review, daily census and staff posting review, schedule review, medical record review, infection log review, policy review and interview the facility failed to maintain an effective governing body, legally responsible to establish and implement policies regarding the management and operation of the facility including but not limited to staffing needs, complete and accurate medical records, staff education and certification renewal to ensure the total care needs of all residents, residing in the facility, are met as planned. This had the potential to affect all 37 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #108's personnel file revealed the STNA's certification to work in a long term care facility was verified with the nurse aide registry (keeps track of those individuals who have met written and skills test criteria to be certified for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — widespread
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of e-mail correspondence, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure medical records were accurate and complete. This affected four (Resident #9, #14, #24, and #50) of four records reviewed but had the potential to affect all 37 residents residing in the building. Findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including paranoid schizophrenia, delusional disorders, anxiety, major depression, Vitamin B 12 and D deficiency, suicidal ideations, insomnia, and protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of Resident #9's physician progress notes for 2024 revealed no evidence the physician progress notes were filed in the resident's paper medical record or scanned into the electronic medical record (EMR) Interview on [DATE] at 9:50 A.M., with Registered Nurse (RN) #180 and the Administrator, confirmed the physician had visited the resident on [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], and [DATE] however, the progress notes had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on infection control log review, interviews and policy review the facility failed to maintain a comprehensive infection control program responsible for tracking and trending infections. This had the potential to affect all 37 residents residing in the facility. Findings included: 1. Review of the infection control log dated 04/24 to 06/24 revealed no evidence infections were being trended. Further review revealed all the infections listed on the log were treated with antibiotics. There was no documented evidence of infections not treated with antibiotics. 2. Further review revealed no evidence staff illnesses were being tracked/monitored. 3. Review of the facility policies revealed no evidence an infection control policy and procedure was readily available for staff reference. Interview with Infection Preventionist (IP)/Registered Nurse (RN) #167 on 07/03/24 at 8:33 A.M., revealed she had not trended infections for the last six months or so and she doesn't always include the organism on the tracking log. The IP nurse reported she was told by someone (would not provide name)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-29 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the infection control logs, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure infections met criteria for treatment with antibiotics. This affected seven residents (Resident #8, #15, #21, #22, #36, #52 and #53) of 37 residents residing in the facility. Findings included: 1. Review of April 2024 infection control log revealed: Resident #53 was treated with Cipro 250 milligrams (mg) twice daily for 10 days for a urinary tract infection (UTI). There was no documented evidence the resident meet McGeer Criteria (provide standardized guidance for infection surveillance activities and research studies in nursing homes and similar facilities). for treatment of the UTI. The physician was not notified regarding the antibiotic use. 2. Review of May 2024 infection control log revealed: a. Resident #8 had an oral infection and was treated with an erythromycin dose pack. There was no documented evidence the resident met McGeer Criteria for treatment or the physician was updated regarding treatment. b. Resident #21 was treated with Bactrim DS twice a day for eight days…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-29 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the certificate of training, review of the facility assessment, and interview the facility failed to ensure the Infection Preventionist (IP) had specialized training in infection prevention and control from 09/23 through 07/02/24. This had the potential to affect all 37 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Nursing Home Infection Preventionist Training Course certificate revealed Register Nurse (RN) #167 completed the course on 07/02/24. Interview on 07/02/24 at 8:50 A.M., with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed she was hired about seven months ago and the IP nurse had been RN #167 since she (the DON) started. Interview on 07/02/24 at 1:16 P.M. and 07/03/24 at 11:46 A.M. with RN #167 revealed she had been the IP nurse for about one year now, however she just started the IP training a little over a week ago (06/23/24). She thought she had completed the course, however when she logged into the system today…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-07-29 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on personnel file review, review of the facility assessment, and interview the facility failed to ensure State Tested Nursing Assistants (STNA) received the required 12 hours of in-service training per year. This had the potential to affect all 37 residents residing in the building. Findings included: 1. Review of STNA #154's personnel file revealed STNA #154 was hired on [DATE]. There was no documented evidence the STNA had in-service hours for 2023 or 2024. 2. Review of STNA #138's personnel file revealed STNA #138 was hired on [DATE]. There was no documented evidence the STNA had in-service hours for 2023 or 2024. 3. Review of STNA #110's personnel file revealed STNA #110 was hired on [DATE]. There was no documented evidence the STNA had in-service hours for 2023 or 2024. 4. Review of STNA #153's personnel file revealed STNA #153 was hired on [DATE]. There was no documented evidence the STNA had in-service hours for 2023 or 2024. 5. Review of STNA #162's personnel file revealed STNA #162 was hired on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-29 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident assessments were completed accurately on admission. This affected one (Resident #14) of three residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments. The facility census was 37. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including femur fracture, left wrist fracture, cirrhosis, esophageal varices, pancytopenia, and hypertension. Review of Resident #14's hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] revealed no evidence the resident had pressure ulcers. Review of Resident #14's admission history of physical dated 05/07/24 revealed no evidence the resident had pressure ulcers. Review of Resident #14's nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a surgical incision (right wrist and right hip), scattered bruising throughout the body. The note indicated the resident had no other skin issues noted. Review of Resident #14's five-day admission Minimum Date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to provide comprehensive pressure ulcer care timely and as ordered. This affected one (Resident #14) of three reviewed for care and services. The facility census was 37. Findings included: Record review revealed Resident #14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including femur fracture, left wrist fracture, cirrhosis, esophageal varices, pancytopenia, and hypertension. Review of Resident #14's hospital Discharge summary, dated [DATE], revealed no evidence the resident had pressure ulcers. Review of Resident #14's admission history of physical, dated 05/07/24, revealed no evidence the resident had pressure ulcers. Review of Resident #14's nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had surgical incisions (right wrist and right hip) and scattered bruising throughout the body. The note indicated the resident had no other skin issues noted. Review of Resident #14's skilled note, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-29 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
    Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided a comprehensive, resident centered plan for urostomy care This affected one (Resident #50) of one residents residing in the facility with a urostomy. The facility census was 37. Findings included: Closed record review revealed Resident #50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic systolic heart failure, cardiomyopathy, hypertension, ventricular tachycardia, urinary tract infections, atrial fibrillation, acute kidney failure, retention of urine, and mixed hyperlipidemia. The residence expired on [DATE]. Review of Resident #50's hospital Discharge summary, dated [DATE], revealed the resident had acute cystitis secondary to Escherichia. Coli (bacteria found in feces) due to cystostomy catheter (surgical connection between the urinary bladder and the skin used to drain urine) malfunctioning urostomy (surgical procedure that creates a stoma (artificial opening) for the urinary system). It…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure residents received physician ordered nutritional supplements for identified nutritional needs. This affected one (Resident #50) of three residents reviewed for care and services. The census was 37. Findings included: Closed record review revealed Resident #50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic systolic heart failure, cardiomyopathy, hypertension, ventricular tachycardia, urinary tract infections, Escherichia coli (E. coli), atrial fibrillation, acute kidney failure, retention of urine, and mixed hyperlipidemia. Review of Resident #50's hospital Discharge summary, dated [DATE], revealed the resident had moderate malnutrition and anasarca (general swelling throughout the body). Ensure (a nutritional supplement) three times a day was ordered for hypoalbuminmenia (when your body doesn't produce enough of the protein, albumin) and anasarca secondary to poor intakes from ileus and would need increased…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-29 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed and open medical record review, review of the facility investigation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure medications were administered per physician orders resulting in significant medication errors. This affected two (Resident #6 and #25) of 11 residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 37. Findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, transient ischemic attack (TIA), Vitamin D deficiency, acute cystitis, anemia, anxiety, epilepsy, chronic pain, glaucoma, peripheral vascular disease, gastroenteritis, osteoporosis, overactive bladder, falls, long term use of anticoagulants, and history of venous thrombosis and embolism. Review of Resident #6's progress notes, dated 05/28/24, revealed the nurse was walking down the hall with medication and forgot which room Resident #28 was in and the STNA (unidentified) said the resident was in the room (specific location was provided in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to store refrigerated food and frozen food in a sanitary method. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 32. Findings include: During the initial kitchen tour on 05/30/23 at 8:30 A.M. observation of the freezer revealed a closed plastic bag filled with frozen sausage patties with no date located on the bag. Further observation of the freezer revealed a cardboard box of pre-made biscuits with a plastic bag full of biscuits which was left open to air. Observation of the walk-in cooler on 05/30/23 at 8:35 A.M. revealed a cardboard box of beef franks with one beef frank in a plastic bag which was left open to air. Further observation revealed a cardboard box of individually sealed butter packets with a partially covered quarter stick of butter wrapped in the original paper wrapper left open to air. A cardboard box of individually wrapped sticks of butter were observed with a partially wrapped half stick of butter left open to air. Interview with Dietary Staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-01 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide evidence or documentation of the Infection Preventionist's (IP) specialized training in infection prevention and control. This had the potential to affect all 32 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Record review revealed a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Nursing Home Infection Preventionist Training Course certificate for Corporate Registered Nurse (RN) #160. Interview on 05/30/23 at 4:15 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed she is the facility's designated Infection Preventionist but does not have a certificate or documentation indicating completion of the required specialized training. The DON further confirmed the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Nursing Home Infection Preventionist Training Course certificate provided to the survey team was issued to Corporate Registered Nurse (RN) #160 who is not the facility's infection preventionist and does not work at the facility at least part-time.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-01 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #13's advanced directive form was dated by the physician and failed to ensure Resident #286's advanced directive form was properly signed and matched the physician order. This affected two (Resident #13 and Resident #286) of seventeen residents reviewed for advanced directives. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia, diabetes mellitus, and anxiety. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 04/15/23, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The MDS further revealed Resident #13 required limited, one-person assistance with personal hygiene, toileting, dressing, and bed mobility. Review of Resident #13's Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) Comfort Care Form was signed by the physician, however, there…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-01 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to notify the resident representative of a change in health status. This affected one (Resident #13) of one resident reviewed for notification of change. The facility census was 32. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia, diabetes mellitus, and anxiety. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 04/15/23, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The MDS further revealed Resident #13 required limited, one-person assistance with personal hygiene, toileting, dressing, and bed mobility. Review of the plan of care, dated 01/02/23, revealed the resident had a potential for alteration in respiratory status related to impaired breathing patterns such as shortness of breath related to COPD with interventions including to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-01 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure residents utilizing a reclining wheelchair were assessed to determine if the device was utilized as a potential restraint. This affected one of one residents (Resident #27) reviewed for potential restraint use. The facility census was 32. Findings include: Observations of Resident #27 on 05/30/23, 05/31/23, and 06/01/23 revealed the use of a tilt-in-space (allows the whole chair to tilt up to 30 to 60 degrees keeping the knees and hips at a 90 degree angle) reclining wheelchair. Review of Resident #27's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/20/21 with diagnoses that included cerebrovascular accident with hemiplegia and hemiparesis and diabetes mellitus. Further review of the medical record found no evidence of physician's orders for the use a reclining tilt-in-space wheelchair. There was no evidence of any type assessment found to determine if the tilt-in-space wheelchair was a potential restraint or a resident safety enabler used for positioning and comfort. On 05/31/23 at 2:13…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-01 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to complete a significant change assessment for a resident receiving hospice services. This affected one resident (Resident #23) out of two residents reviewed for receiving hospice services. The facility census was 32. Findings include: Review of Resident #23's medical record revealed Resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with admitting diagnoses including anxiety disorder, dementia, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder. Review of Residents #23 physician orders revealed order dated 12/29/21 for hospice services via Incare Hospice related to senile degeneration of the brain. Review of Resident #23 care plan revealed the facility hospice care plan revised 04/25/22, included collaboration of care for Resident #23 between the facility and hospice. Further review revealed Resident #23 was recertified to continue hospice services and the hospice plan of care revised on 04/23/23 for the continuation of hospice services through 06/23/23.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-01 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident assessments were completed accurately to reflect physical behaviors, type of falls, medication use and frequency. This affected two (Resident #29 and #30) of twelve residents reviewed for accuracy of assessment. The facility census was 32. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #29's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/02/22 with diagnoses that included dementia with psychotic disturbance, delusional disorder and diabetes mellitus. Further review of the medical record included nursing progress notes revealed on 11/04/22 Resident #29 was involved in an altercation with Resident #14, when Resident #29 pushed Resident #14 to the ground and then kicked him. Staff members intervened immediately and separated the residents. At this time Resident #29 was placed on one on one observations and physician notified. The physician indicated to send Resident #29 for a mental health evaluation. On 11/05/22 Resident #29 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-01 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to revise and update Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) for major mental disorder diagnosis and prescribed psychotropic medications. This affected three residents (Resident #31, Resident #284, Resident #286) out of three residents reviewed for PASARR. The facility census was 32. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #284's medical record revealed Resident #284 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the admitting diagnoses including bipolar disorder, hemiplegia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and Diabetes Mellitus type 2. Review of Resident #284 physician orders revealed Resident #284 was ordered an antipsychotic medication Seroquel 50 milligrams two times a day for bipolar disorder. Review of Resident #284 Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) dated 05/25/23 revealed in section E - Indications of Serious Mental Illness question number one was marked for having a diagnosis of panic or other severe anxiety…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure resident's nutritional plans of care were revised to include adaptive equipment and/or revised to include the correct adaptive equipment used by the residents. This affected three residents (#10, #27, and #33) of three residents reviewed for adaptive equipment. Findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including blindness in right and left eye and gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD). Review of Resident #10's orders dated September 2023 revealed on 06/23/23 the resident was ordered a scoop plate and scoop bowl for all meals. Review of Resident #10's plan of care including the nutritional plan of care initiated on 06/07/23 and the blindness plan of care initiated on 06/16/23 revealed no evidence of the scoop plate and scoop bowl for all meals per the residents' orders on 06/23/23. Interview on 09/11/23 at 11:17 A.M., with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed Resident #10's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician order indicated a specific topical antibiotic for a wound treatment and failed to discontinue a physician order for one-to-one supervision following readmission from the hospital. This affected two (Resident #13 and Resident #29) of 13 residents reviewed. The facility census was 32. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia, diabetes mellitus, and anxiety. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 04/15/23, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The MDS further revealed Resident #13 required limited, one-person assistance with personal hygiene, toileting, dressing, and bed mobility. Review of a nursing progress note, dated 05/25/23 at 9:00 A.M., revealed the resident was seen in the emergency room for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to provide nutritional intervention to facilitate healing to a resident with an unstageable suspected deep tissue injury as ordered by the physician. This affected one Resident (#31) of one resident reviewed for pressure ulcer/injury. The facility census was 32. Findings included: Review of Resident #31's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including pneumonia, generalized muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, fibromyalgia, and bipolar disorder. Review of Resident #31's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 04/14/23, revealed she was cognitively independent. Further review revealed she had two unstageable deep tissue injuries (persistent non-blanchable deep red, maroon or purple discoloration; intact skin with localized area of persistent non-blanchable deep red, maroon, purple discoloration due to damage of underlying soft tissue), had pressure reducing devices for her chair…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-01 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure residents with poor nutrition received nutritional supplements as recommended and ordered. This affected two residents (#5 and #25) of three residents reviewed for nutritional supplements. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #25's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including lung cancer, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, anorexia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, and depression. Review of Resident #25's nutrition assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had inadequate oral intakes and intakes not meeting estimated needs to maintain weight as evidence by varied intakes. Recommend house supplement daily and monitor. Review of Resident #25's orders dated September 2023 revealed no evidence of a physician order for house supplement daily. Review of Resident #25's medication/treatment administration records dated September 2023 revealed no evidence house…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-01 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure psychotropic medications were ordered with appropriate diagnoses and Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) assessments were completed for a resident receiving antipsychotic medications. This affected one resident (#31) of one resident reviewed for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review. The facility census was 32. Findings included: Review of Resident #31's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including pneumonia, generalized muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, fibromyalgia, and bipolar disorder. Review of Resident #31's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 04/14/23, revealed she was cognitively independent, had an active diagnosis of bipolar disorder, and during the seven day look back period received an antidepressant for six days and an antipsychotic for five days. 1. Review of Resident #31's physician order, dated 04/08/23, identified risperidone (an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-01 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders for laboratory testing was followed and completed as ordered. This affected one (Resident #29) of five residents reviewed for medication use. The facility census was 32. Findings include: Review of Resident #29's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/02/22 with diagnoses that included dementia with psychotic disturbance, delusional disorder and diabetes mellitus. Further review of the medical record including physician's orders revealed on 01/10/23 the physician ordered the following laboratory testing: complete blood count (CBC), base metabolic profile (BMP), lipid panel, vitamin D level and HgbA1c level. Review of laboratory results found no evidence labs were obtained as ordered on 01/10/23. On 05/31/23 at 2:11 P.M., interview with the facility Administrator verified no labs were completed as ordered on 01/10/23 for Resident #29.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2026-05-15 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure the daily posted nursing staff information was current. This had the potential to affect all 31 residents residing in the facility. The census was 31.Findings include: On 04/20/26 at 9:40 A.M. during the initial tour an observation revealed the required daily nurse staff posting was dated 04/18/26. No other posting of the daily nurse staffing was observed during the tour.In an interview on 04/20/26 at 9:45 A.M. Activities Director #103 confirmed the observed posting was dated 04/18/26 and was not current.This is an incidental finding discovered during the course of the complaint investigation.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$227,850 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.

  • $52,360 — penalty dated 2025-09-22
  • $175,490 — penalty dated 2024-07-29
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-02-07 for 4 days
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-08-23 for 41 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIONSTONE CARE — 24 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.7+0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 23 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
LIONSTONE ALS OPCO HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 07/01/2022
KAZARNOVSKY, SOLOMONIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF50%since 06/30/2022
STEIN, ABBAIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF50%since 06/30/2022
CUSNER, ADAMIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/27/2025
DEGYANSKY, JEFFREYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2020
GOLDISH, ELIEZERIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/09/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$2.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-14.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$304K
Related-party expense10% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 61%Medicare 5%Other / private 33%

This home reported $304K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$260per resident / day
operating cost
$7,891per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$227per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366448. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-28, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next