Cottingham Retirement Community

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 40 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.59 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 88% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 56.7 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.99 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.61 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.63 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.71 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.10 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.70 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2022-08-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, review of the transportation service report, staff interviews, physician interview, and review of the facility policy regarding change in a resident's condition, the facility failed to timely notify the physician of a significant change of condition for one resident (#55). This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for serious life-threatening harm, injury, and/or death when Resident #55 experienced abnormally low blood pressures over the course of four hours with no notification to the physician of the abnormal levels until Resident #55 was found unresponsive on [DATE] at 5:45 A.M. and subsequently expiring at the hospital later that evening. This affected one (#55) of four residents reviewed for a change in condition. The facility census was 57 residents. On [DATE] at 1:11 P.M., the Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), and Regional Director of Clinical Services #500 were notified that Immediate Jeopardy began on [DATE] at 1:24 A.M. when Licensed Practical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-02-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, review of the freezer and refrigerator temperature logs, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and prepared under sanitary conditions. This had the potential to affect 56 out of 56 residents who eat food prepared in the kitchen. The facility identified one (Resident #08) who did not eat food by mouth. The facility census was 57.Findings Included:Observation of the dry food storage area on 02/09/26 at 6:33 P.M. revealed a package of opened, undated sandwich buns with mold growing on one of the buns. In addition, there was an opened, undated loaf of white bread. The Dietary Supervisor #132 verified the above items and discarded them.Observation of the walk-in refrigerator in the main kitchen on 02/09/26 at 6:44 P.M. revealed a loosely covered cart of pre-prepared foods with a date of 02/03/26. The cart contained five trays of individual prepared salads, a tray of individual servings of pumpkin pie, two trays of individual servings of coconut cream pie and two trays of individual dishes of pears. Located next to the cart dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure discharge summaries were completed. This affected one (#01) of one resident reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 57.Findings include:Review of the closed medical record for Resident #01 revealed an admission date of 11/07/25 and a discharge date of 02/03/26. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease without dyskinesia with fluctuations, hyperlipidemia, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, major depressive disorder, repeated falls, bipolar disorder, cerebrovascular disease, conversion disorder with seizures or convulsions, encephalopathy, other symbolic dysfunctions, and chronic viral hepatitis B without delta-agent.Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #01 was cognitively intact. Resident #01 was assessed to require setup assistance for eating, oral hygiene, and personal hygiene, and partial/moderate assistance for toileting,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure care was coordinated with the hospice provider. This affected one (#29) of three residents reviewed for hospice services. The facility census was 57. Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #29 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, cognitive communication deficit, aphasia, hemiplegia (right side), unspecified convulsions, stenosis of right cerebral artery, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, hypertension and history of transient ischemic attacks. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/18/25, revealed Resident #29 was moderately cognitively impaired. Further review of Resident #29's medical record revealed a referral for hospice services on 11/06/25. Review of a progress note, dated 11/12/25 and authored by Social Service Director (SSD) #214, revealed a care conference was held with Resident #29's family and they felt a hospice referral…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to have physician orders in place for the administration of oxygen. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure appropriate oxygen in use signage was posted. This affected one (#56) of two residents reviewed for oxygen therapy. The facility census was 57.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #56 revealed an admission date of 02/14/2023. Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, asthma, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, morbid obesity, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder, recurrent, moderate.Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had no cognitive impairment. Review of the physician orders revealed Resident #56 did not have orders for the administration of oxygen.Observations on 02/10/26 at 10:16 A.M. and on 02/11/26 at 10:45 A.M. revealed Resident #56 was receiving oxygen at two liters per minute (lpm)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff interview, and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure medications were stored in an appropriate manner. This affected one (#11) of four residents reviewed for medication storage. The facility census was 57.Findings include:Record review for Resident #11 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dementia, chronic venous hypertension, Type II diabetes, and neuropathy. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #11 had minimally impaired cognition.Review of the physician orders revealed Resident #11 received the following medications: gabapentin oral capsule 300 milligrams (mg), three capsules by mouth twice daily for neuropathy and carvedilol 3.125 mg, one tablet by mouth twice daily for hypertension.Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for 02/10/26 and 02/11/26 revealed Resident #11 was administered gabapentin and carvedilol as ordered.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff and resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper enhanced barrier precautions were donned when completing a wound treatment. This affected one (Resident #17) of three residents reviewed for infection control. In addition, the facility failed to develop and implement a water management plan to mitigate the risk of Legionella. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 57.Findings Include:1. Resident #17 was admitted to facility on 04/28/25. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's Disease, infection of the skin, low back pain, depression, anxiety disorder, diabetes, hypertensive retinopathy, dermatochalasis, chronic kidney disease, diabetic retinopathy, and kidney transplant. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #17 was severely cognitively impaired and suffered with moderate depression. Resident #17 had an infected diabetic foot ulcer; treatments…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure timely provision of a pneumococcal vaccine to a resident once consented. This affected one (Resident #19) of five residents reviewed for pneumococcal vaccine administration. The facility census was 57.Findings Include:Review of the medical record for Resident #19 revealed an admission date of 08/06/2025. Diagnoses included unspecified dementia, chronic kidney disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, and muscle weakness.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe problems with thinking and memory. The resident was set up assistance for eating, supervision assistance for ambulation, moderate assistance for oral hygiene, upper body dressing, personal hygiene, sit to stand, and transfers, and maximal assistance for toileting, bathing and lower body dressing. Resident #19 was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder and rejected care and had wandering…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0887 — isolated
  Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure timely provision of COVID-19 vaccine to a resident once consented. This affected one (Resident #55) of five residents reviewed for COVID-19 vaccine administration. The facility census was 57.Findings Include:Review of the medical record of Resident #55 revealed an admission date of 08/05/25. Diagnoses included nondisplaced lateral mass fracture of first cervical vertebra, subsequent encounter for fracture with delayed healing, muscle weakness, unspecified dementia, and anxiety disorder.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #55 had moderate problems with thinking and memory. The resident was independent mobilizing in her wheelchair, setup assistance for eating, supervision assistance for sit to stand and transfers, moderate assistance for oral hygiene, toileting, bathing, upper and lower body dressing, and personal hygiene. Resident #55 was always incontinent of bladder and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, medical record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure call lights were functional. This affected one (#12) of three residents reviewed for call lights. The facility census was 57. Findings include:Review of Resident #12's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease, dysphagia, glaucoma, congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, heart disease, dementia without behaviors, osteoporosis, benign prostatic hyperplasia, anxiety disorder, edema, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, and hypertension.Review or Resident #12's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/05/26, revealed the resident was mildly cognitively impaired. Resident #12 utilized a wheelchair for mobility, required set-up assistance for eating, and moderate assistance with toileting, oral hygiene, dressing, and personal hygiene. Interview with Resident #12 on 02/10/26 at 2:39 P.M. revealed his…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of the medical record, observations, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Coronavirus-19 (COVID-19) precautions were implemented appropriately for all positive residents. This had the potential to affect all 58 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 58. Findings include: Review of the medical record for 24 residents (#1, #4, #6, #8, #10, #12, #13, #15, #19, #21, #23, #26, #37, #41, #44, #45, #48, #49, #50, #53, #56, #58, #63, and #64) revealed the residents had tested positive for COVID-19 when the outbreak started in the facility on 12/08/25. Observation on 12/22/25 at 8:06 A.M. revealed Registered Nurse (RN) #30 went into Resident #26's room, who was COVID-19 positive, without wearing a N-95, gown, gloves, or face shield as required, to administer medications wearing a surgical mask only. Interview on 12/22/25 at 8:09 A.M. with RN #30 verified she did not wear the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) as required when entering Resident #26's room. RN #30 confirmed Resident #26 was positive for COVID-19.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIONSTONE CARE — 24 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $219K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH