No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Als Woodstock INC

1649 Park Rd, Woodstock, OH 43084 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 42 certified beds · (937) 826-3351 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (937) 826-3351 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0607) — cited Apr 2019Resident-funds citations (F0565, F0568)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation$42,094 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0568)
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $42,094 in federal fines (most recent 2024-02-20)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (60%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
15 N Main St · (937) 834-5320 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
26 S Main St · (937) 834-2270 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
11907 State Route 161 · (614) 879-6896 · Call to confirm hours
Park
N Lewisburg Community Park · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
332 W Bennett St · (937) 826-3253

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased2.2%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.9%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms48.2%30.1%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.2%3.2%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened0.0%6.1%16.1%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication19.7%25.5%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.7%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control9.3%21.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table15.9%8.8%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication5.0%1.2%1.4%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.541.731.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days6.031.801.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.42U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.25hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.15hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.42 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 72% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.62
RN hours/ resident / day
0.79
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.68
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.09
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.58
RN hoursweekends
59.5%
Total nursing turnover
57.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 42 beds and averages 39.1 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.09 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.62 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.68 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.15 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.58 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-10-31)
1
at the previous standard inspection (2021-10-14)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

38 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2024-10-31 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interview, review of dental visit documentation, review of hospital documentation, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with timely dental services to address non-restorable and decaying teeth. Actual harm occurred to Resident #33 when the dentist identified the resident's teeth required extraction (removal) and the facility failed to follow up with a referral to an oral surgeon. This resulted in the resident developing fever and chills which prompted a visit to the emergency department where the resident was diagnosed with system inflammatory response syndrome and bacteremia caused by a tooth infection. This affected one (#33) of one residents reviewed for dental services. The census was 35. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #33 revealed an admission date of 06/25/20. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease and diabetes mellitus. Further review of the medical record revealed the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to follow infection control protocol when changing a wound dressing. This affected one (#19) of three residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 42. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #19 revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses including rhabdomyolysis, hyponatremia, hypertension, heart disease, diabetes mellitus type two, personality disorder, convulsions, Rickets and right leg amputation. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #19 revealed an intact cognition. Resident #19 required set up assistance for eating, supervision assistance for bed mobility and toileting. Resident #19 requires extensive assistance for transfers. Resident #19 was coded as receiving wound care for diabetic ulcer during the look back period. Review of the plan of care for dated 06/30/25 for Resident #19 revealed resident is at risk for experiencing an alteration in skin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of a facility self-reported incident (SRI) and staff interviews, the facility failed to develop a plan of care to address a resident's behaviors. This affected one (#11) of three residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 42. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #11 revealed admission date of 04/23/25 with diagnoses including Diabetes Mellitus, stroke, ataxia following stroke, depression and anxiety. The resident was discharged on 06/05/25 to another skilled nursing facility. The discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed with a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. The resident was required set up of touching assistance for Activities of Daily Living. Review of Resident #11's physician orders revealed an order dated 05/23/25 for one-on-one (1:1) supervision until further notice. Review of Resident #11's Health Status Note dated 06/01/25 at 8:54 A.M. revealed resident continues to be 1:1 with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-22 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, review of the facility activity calendar, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure group activities were conducted as scheduled. This had the potential to affect 22 residents residing in the facility who regularly attend group activities, the facility identified 17 (#02, #03, #04, #05, #06, #08, #10, #14, #16, #19, #22, #24, #25, #26, #30, #34, and #35) residents who chose not to attend and/or are not physically able to attend group activities. The facility census was 39. Findings include: Review of the activity calendar for 01/21/25 revealed documentation to support the facility had a group activity scheduled for 9:00 A.M. The activity planned was coffee time in the activity room. Review of the activity calendar on 01/21/25 at 10:30 A.M. revealed a planned group activity of exercise in the facility dining room. Observation on 01/21/25 at 9:07 A.M. revealed the activity room door to be closed and locked. Observation of the facility common areas and dining room revealed no group activity taking place.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to notify a resident representative of change of condition. This affected one (#39) out of the three residents reviewed for change of condition. The facility census was 39. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #39 revealed an admission date of 04/20/21 with medical diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, alcohol dementia, behavioral disturbances, Wernicke's encephalopathy, and peripheral vascular disease. Review of the medical record for Resident #39 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/01/25, which indicated Resident #39 had moderate cognitive impairment and required supervision with oral care, toilet hygiene, and bathing. The MDS indicated Resident #39 was independent with eating, bed mobility, and transfers. Review of the medical record for Resident #39 revealed a nurse's note, dated 11/26/24 at 1:40 P.M., which stated Resident #39 tested positive for Coronavirus Disease 2019…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient smoking assessments were completed to determine resident capabilities and deficits regarding smoking safety. This affected four (#2, #13, #16, and #26) of five residents reviewed for smoking. The facility census was 35. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 04/20/21. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, and panlobular emphysema (BLE). Review of Resident #26's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was assessed with moderately impaired cognition. Review of Resident #26's most recent smoking evaluation dated 09/03/24 revealed the resident was assessed to use tobacco products; however, there was no additional assessment information to determine resident safety or clinical suggestions related to smoking needs in regard to determining if the resident required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-31 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were reviewed and responded to timely from the physician. This affected four (#2, #7, #9, and #33) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The current census was 35. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #2 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #2 include cerebral palsy, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and epilepsy. Review of Resident #2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition and was receiving antidepressant medications during the assessment period. Review of Resident #2's medication orders revealed on 03/22/23 the resident received orders to be administered citalopram 10 milligrams (mg) daily for depression and on amitriptyline 10 mg daily for depression. Review of Resident #2's pharmacy recommendation dated 06/12/24 revealed a recommendation made to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans as required. This affected one (#31) of three residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 35. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #31 revealed an admission date of 01/03/23 with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, type two diabetes, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, hypertension, anxiety, seizures, and varicose veins of the left lower extremity with an ulcer of the ankle. Review of Resident #31's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact with one stage one pressure ulcer (non-blanchable erythema of intact skin). Review of Resident #31's care plan dated 07/02/24 revealed there was no care plan developed regarding the wound to the left medial ankle or seeing the wound clinic. Interview on 10/29/24 at 2:52 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified Resident #31 did not have a care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and resident and staff interview, the failed to ensure physician orders were in place to address wound treatments. This affected one (#31) of one residents reviewed for wounds. The facility census was 35. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #31 revealed an admission date of 01/03/23. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, type two diabetes, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, hypertension, anxiety, seizures, and varicose veins of the left lower extremity with an ulcer of the ankle. Review of Resident #31's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact with one stage one pressure ulcer (non-blanchable erythema of intact skin). Review of a health status note dated 07/24/24 revealed Resident #31 was seen by a physician regarding the wound on the left ankle. A new order was received to send the resident to the wound clinic and an appointment was scheduled on 07/30/24 at 3:00 P.M. The resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure psychotropic as needed medications had an appropriate stop date or rationale for extending the usage as required. This affected one (#9) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 35. Findings include: Record review for Resident #9 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #9 include paranoid schizophrenia, diabetes type two, depression, anxiety, and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #9's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had impaired cognition. Per the assessment, the resident received anti-anxiety and antidepressant medications during the assessment period. Review of Resident #9's physician orders dated 11/01/23 revealed the resident was ordered to receive the anti-anxiety medication lorazepam one (1) milligram (mg) as needed every eight hours for anxiety with no stop date included in the order. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interview, pharmacy delivery document review, and policy review the facility failed to administer an antibiotic as ordered by the physician. This affected one (#7) of one resident reviewed for urinary tract infections. The facility census was 35. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 05/24/23 with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, type one diabetes, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, hypertension, schizoaffective disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #7's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #7's physician orders for October 2024 revealed the resident was ordered the antibiotic piperacillin/tazobactum (Zosyn) 3-0.375 gram (gm)/50 milliliter (ml) every six hours for seven days from 10/18/24 through 10/24/24. Resident #7 was ordered Zosyn 3-0.375 gm four times daily for eight administrations…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 27 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, review of the medical record, review of the police report, review of the hospital documentation, and review of the facility's wandering and exit-seeking policy and procedure, the facility failed to provide a safe environment and adequate supervision to prevent Resident #8 from exiting the facility without staff knowledge. This affected one (Resident #8) of three residents reviewed for elopement. The facility identified six residents (Resident #8, #19, #20, #23, #25, and #33) at risk for elopement. The facility census was 39. Findings include: Review of Resident #8's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including pulmonary nodule, metastatic squamous cell carcinoma, and emphysema. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #8 had severe cognitive impairment, required contact guard assistance from staff with ambulation, exhibited wandering behaviors, and required an elopement…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-25 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident and staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident concerns brought up at the resident council meeting were addressed timely and appropriately. This affected nine (#05, #07, #10, #13, #14, #18, #30, #32, and #36) residents in regular attendance of the resident council meetings. The Facility census was 39. Findings include: Review of the resident council meeting minutes dated 09/2023 revealed concerns related to the Administrator, needing to spend more time in the facility and concerns related to nursing and the staff taking too long to answer call lights. Review of the resident council meeting minutes dated 12/2023 revealed concerns related to the Administrator, messing things up, making promises that were not kept, and he couldn't remember what he was told. The meeting also brought up concerns related to agency nurses. Interview on 01/22/24 at 11:00 A.M. with Resident #23 revealed the facility does not address resident concerns timely and revealed the Administrator was not seen often at the building fixing the concerns. Interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's representatives were notified when a change in condition occurred. This affected two (#16 and #21) of three residents reviewed for change in condition. The facility census was 39. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for the Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 06/24/16. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis unspecified cerebrovascular disease, bipolar disorder, dysphasia, and muscle weakness. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #16 was cognitively impaired with a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) of six and required moderate assistance from staff with eating. Resident #16 was dependent on staff for mobility and transfers. Review a nurse's progress note dated 11/24/23 for Resident #16 revealed the nurse noticed a change in condition when the resident had an altered mental status, had dark foul-smelling urine and the physician was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a home like environment for one (#16) of three residents reviewed for physical environment. The facility census was 39. Findings include: Review of the medical record for the Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 06/24/16. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis unspecified cerebrovascular disease, bipolar disorder, dysphasia, and muscle weakness. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #16 was cognitively impaired with a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) of six and was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLS). Interview and observation on 01/22/24 at 12:15 P.M. with Resident #16 revealed an outlet cover above him was hanging out of the wall approximately eight inches and had a cable cord hanging from it. The resident reported it had been that way since he was moved to the room a few weeks ago. Interview on 01/22/24 at 12:34 P.M. with State Tested…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interviews, staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received showers as scheduled. This affected two (#16 and #21) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). The Facility census was 39. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for the Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 06/24/16. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis unspecified cerebrovascular disease, bipolar disorder, dysphasia, and muscle weakness. Review of the shower preference document revealed Resident #16 was scheduled to get showers on Sundays and Wednesdays. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #16 was cognitively impaired with a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) of six and the resident was dependent on staff for bathing. Review of the shower sheets from the past three months (10/15/23 to 01/23/24) for Resident #16, revealed the resident was offered showers on (Sunday) 10/15/23, (Sunday) 10/29/23,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's call lights were answered timely. This affected one (#23) of the three residents reviewed for call lights. The facility census was 39. Findings include: Review of the medical record for the Resident #23 revealed an admission date of 02/19/18. Diagnoses included cerebral palsy, diabetes, somatization disorder, epilepsy, borderline personality disorder, dysphasia, paraplegia, and muscle weakness. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #23 was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 and required partial assistance from staff for mobility and activities of daily living (ADLs). Interview on 01/22/24 at 11:00 A.M. with Resident #23 revealed the facility did not have enough staff to provide needed care for residents and had long waits for the call lights to be answered. Observation at the same time revealed Resident #23 activated his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, resident interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received their diet as ordered. This affected one (#35) of three residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 39. Findings include: Review of the medical record for the Resident #35 revealed an admission date of 11/26/20. Diagnoses included sepsis, morbid obesity, hyperlipidemia, gastro esophageal reflux disease (GERD), diabetes, intellectual disability, and muscle weakness. Review of a dietary note dated 10/03/22 revealed Resident #35 was recommended to receive half portioned meals for lunch and dinner. Review of a physician's order dated 10/04/22 revealed Resident #35 was ordered to receive half portioned meals. Review of a dietary note dated 12/20/23 revealed Resident #35 had stable weights and received half portion meals for lunch and dinner. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #35 was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview Mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, resident interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided with the appropriate assistive devices for dining. This affected one (#16) of three residents reviewed for assistive devices for dining. The facility identified eight (#05, #7, #14, #16, #17, #19, #36, and #39) residents with orders for adaptive equipment. The facility census was 39. Findings include: Review of the medical record for the Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 06/24/16. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis unspecified cerebrovascular disease, bipolar disorder, dysphasia, and muscle weakness. Review of the plan of care dated 12/17/23 for Resident #16 revealed the resident was at risk for altered nutrition and hydration with interventions to offer encouragement, assistance and cueing as needed at mealtime, encourage to dine in the dining room, provide diet as ordered and the Dietician and Speech Therapy to evaluate as needed, Review of the Minimum Data…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-12-27 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, review of timecard punches, and review of facility schedule, the facility failed to ensure Registered Nurse (RN) coverage was maintained for eight consecutive hours, seven days a week. This had the potential to affect all 39 residents. The facility census was 39. Findings include: Review of the timecard punches for Saturday 12/16/23 revealed no RN coverage for the day. Review of the daily written schedule for Saturday 12/16/23 revealed no RN scheduled for the day. Interview on 12/26/23 at 1:36 P.M. with Director of Nursing (DON) revealed she worked Monday through Friday and is on-call everyday, seven days a week. DON verified no RN was scheduled or worked on Saturday 12/16/23. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00149061.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-12-27 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview with staff and residents, and review of daily menus, the facility failed to follow menus plan to provide nutritious and well-balanced meals. This had the potential to affect all 39 residents who the facility identified as receiving food from the kitchen. The facility census was 39. Findings include: Observation on 12/26/23 at 11:48 A.M. of test tray revealed sloppy joe sandwich, mixed vegetables, and cantaloupe served. The food was palatable. The menu revealed lunch was to be a hamburger, French fries, tossed salad, and cantaloupe. Review of medical record for Resident #03 revealed an admission date of 02/19/18 with diagnoses including but not limited to cerebral palsy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dysphagia, anxiety, type two diabetes, epilepsy, borderline personality disorder, and major depression. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #03 was cognitively intact and required limited assistance for personal hygiene and transfers.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-10-10 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide a clean and sanitary environment for the residents. This affected Resident #36 and #43 and had the potential to affect all 39 residents who resided in the facility. Findings include: Observation on 10/05/23 from 8:30 A.M. through 11:30 A.M. revealed there were four halls where residents resided and traveled throughout the facility. All the halls in the facility were carpeted. The carpeting in all halls was embedded with black dirt, grime, food, and fluid spills. The carpeting was soiled from the beginning of each carpeted area through the end. Many areas on each hall had large, discolored areas with stained like areas. In the dining area, there was visible food residue under the tables and throughout the floor. On the walls in the dining area and in the four resident hallways, there were visible cobwebs containing insects in multiple corners and, on the keypads, leading to the outside of the facility were a large number of dead insects on top of the keypads.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-10 · tag F0568 — isolated
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, review of facility policy, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain full and complete accounting records for the residents. This affected one (#45) of four resident reviewed for facility management of funds. The facility identified 24 residents that the facility manages residents funds. The facility census was 39. Findings include: Review of Resident #45's medical record revealed an admission date 05/09/16. Diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder- bipolar type. Resident #45 has a court appointed guardian of person only. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #45 had cognitive impairment with episodes of delusions and daily behavioral symptoms not directed at others. Review of Resident #45's fund management service authorization and agreement to handle resident funds signed by Resident #45's court appointed guardian on 03/24/23, stated that they authorized the facility to establish and manage an Federal Deposit Insurance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-10 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide residents a diet order to meet their daily nutritional needs. This affected two (Residents #30 and #45) of four residents reviewed for therapeutic diets. The facility census was 39. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #30 revealed an admission date of 08/15/2023 with diagnoses of acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and emphysema. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment indicated Resident #30 had no cognitive impairment. Resident #30 had verbal behavioral symptoms which occurred one to three days during the assessment period and had no rejection of care. Resident #30 was independent with eating. Review of Resident #30's physicians orders revealed they were silent for a diet order. Interview on 10/05/23 at 10:28 A.M., with Resident #30 stated he should be receiving a diet that was consistent with his diagnosis, that did not contain any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-10 · tag F0826 — isolated
    Provide specialized rehabilitative services by qualified personnel, when ordered for a resident by a doctor.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident and staff interviews, review of facility policy, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide a written physicians order for specialized rehabilitative services for a resident. This affected one (Resident #30) of four residents reviewed for specialized rehabilitative services. The facility census was 39. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #30 revealed an admission date of 08/15/23. Diagnoses included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and emphysema. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 08/22/23 revealed Resident #30 had no cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #30's physician orders for 08/15/23 to 09/15/23 revealed there were no physician orders for specialized rehabilitative services for Resident #30. Records of the therapy service records revealed their records were kept in a separate electronic medical record system for therapy. Review of Resident #30's service log summary of physical therapy revealed a 60-minute evaluation was provided 08/22/23. In…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-14 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record review, staff interview, and review of Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) waiver guidance; the facility failed to notify the resident/resident representative of the bed hold and reserve bed payment policy upon transfer to the hospital. This affected one (#30) of one residents reviewed for hospitalization. The census was 34. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #30 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis include acute respiratory failure. Review of an annual minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #30 had severely impaired cognitive function. Review of a progress note dated 08/26/21 at 11:28 P.M., revealed a chest x-ray was completed for Resident #30. The x-ray findings were consistent with interstitial pulmonary edema, atypical/viral infectious etiology may be considered as less likely alternative etiology in the appropriate clinical setting. The progress note revealed the physician was made…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-04-25 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure diagnoses were accurate for the use of antipsychotic medications and failed to ensure adverse side effects from said medications were monitored. This affected one (Resident #4) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications and four review. The facility also failed to ensure adverse side effects from psychotic medications were monitored for four (Residents #30 #34, #25 and #15) of four residents reviewed for psychotropic drug use. The facility census was 37. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #4 revealed an admission date of 01/27/17. Medical diagnoses included hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, seizure disorder, depression, anxiety, and Alzheimer's Disease. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/05/19, revealed Resident #4 was cognitively impaired. Review of a physician order dated 10/03/17 revealed Zyprexa, an anti-psychotic medication, ten milligrams (mg) by mouth at bedtime for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-04-25 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with all current diagnoses. This affected one (Resident #30) of three residents reviewed for accurate assessments. The facility census was 37. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #30 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including osteoporosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pacemaker, Vitamin D deficiency, low back pain, dementia, disc degeneration, major depressive disorder with psychosis, atrial fibrillation and wedge compression fracture of third lumbar. Review of the comprehensive admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required supervision with personal hygiene and ambulation in the corridor. The resident was independent for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, eating, toileting and ambulation in room. Review of the diagnoses revealed the assessment was not coded as having depression with psychosis and dementia.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that care plans were developed for activities. This affected one (Resident #20) of two residents reviewed for activities. The facility census was 37 Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #20 revealed an admission date of 09/20/18. Review of most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #20 had intact cognition. Review of the MDS dated [DATE] revealed interview for activity preferences was coded as somewhat important to have books, newspapers and magazines to read, have music to listen to, be around animals, keep up with the news and attend religious services. The resident identified that it was very important to him to do things with groups of people, to do his favorite activities and go outside when the weather was good. Review of the record revealed no plan of care related to activities. Interview with MDS Coordinator #18 on 04/25/19 09:11 A.M. verified that a plan of care for activities…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-25 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an assessment for activities and an activity calendar were provided for residents. This affected two (Resident #1 and Resident #20) of two residents reviewed for activities. The census was 37. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #4 revealed he was admitted on [DATE]. Medical diagnoses included Alzheimer's Disease, depression and seizure disorder. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed he was severely cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #4's plan of care for activities, dated 02/01/18, revealed the resident had decreased orientation. Activities were needed that promoted a pleasant social environment that he could enjoy and observe. The resident enjoyed staying in his room the majority of the time and coloring books in his room. The interventions were to adapt activity as needed to ensure resident was able to enjoy the activity. Assure activities are compatible with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and review of recommendations and manufacturer's guidelines for side rails and motorized wheelchairs, the facility failed to ensure there was safe distance between the side rail and the mattress on a bed and failed to ensure a motorized wheelchair was set at a safe speed . This affected one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for side rails and one (Resident #2) of five residents who operated a motorized wheelchair. The facility identified there were 22 ambulatory residents of which the speed of the motorized wheelchair could potentially affect. The census was 37. 1. Medical record review for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 12/30/09. Medical diagnoses included anxiety, depression and Schizophrenia. Review of annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/02/19, revealed he was cognitively intact. His functional status was independent for bed mobility, transfers, and eating. He was a limited assistance for toilet use. On this MDS, bed rails were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-04-25 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure side rail assessments were completed for two (Residents #1 and #10) of eight residents reviewed for side rails. The census was 37. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 12/30/09. Medical diagnoses included anxiety, depression and Schizophrenia. Review of annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed he was cognitively intact. His functional status was independent for bed mobility, transfers, and eating. He was a limited assistance for toilet use. On this MDS, bed rails were coded as not being used. Review of the care plan, dated 01/22/15, revealed the resident had a activities of daily living self performance deficit related to postural kyphosis, difficulty walking, and muscle wasting. Interventions were to keep left side of bed against the wall and an enabler to right side of the bed to aid in transfers and repositioning. Review of the most recent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-04-25 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolated
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure side rails were properly installed. This affected three (Residents #1, #5 and #7) of three residents who had reviewed for side rails. The census was 37. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 12/30/09. Observation of the side rail on 04/22/19 at 1:00 P.M. revealed the side rail was attached to the right side of the resident's bed with zip ties. 2. Medical record review for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 02/11/16. Observation of the side rail on 04/22/19 at 1:30 P.M. revealed the side rail was attached to the left side of the resident's bed with zip ties. 3. Medical record review for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 02/19/18. Observation of the side rail on 04/22/19 at 1:40 P.M. revealed the side rail was attached to the right side of the resident's bed with zip ties. Interview with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS) #7 on 04/22/19 at 2:10 P.M. revealed he used zip ties to attach the rails because he did was not provided with installation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-01-22 · tag F0680 — widespread
    Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews, employee file reviews, and review of the facility Activity Director (AD) job description, the facility failed to ensure the employee in the role of AD was qualified as required. This had the potential to affect all 39 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 39. Findings include: Interview on 01/22/25 at 9:18 A.M. with AD #135 confirmed he was hired at the facility as the AD on October 15, 2024, and was currently enrolled in an activity training course. AD #135 confirmed he was not a qualified therapeutic specialist or an activities professional who was licensed by the state or had a minimum of two years' experience in social or recreational program within the past five years or was a qualified occupational therapist or occupational therapist assistant or completed a training course approved by the State. Interview on 01/22/25 at 9:30 A.M. with Regional Nurse #140 confirmed the employee in the role of AD was currently enrolled in a training course for activities certification and had started some of the online training but had not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-10-10 · tag F0711 — widespread
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide signed and dated current physician orders for the month of October 2023. This affected four (Residents #30, #42, #45, and #47) of four residents reviewed for physician orders. This had the potential to affect all 39 residents residing in the facility that received physician services at the facility. Findings include: Review of Resident #30, #42, #45, and #47's paper and electronic medical records revealed there were no October 2023 signed physician orders summary. Interview on 10/05/23 at 11:05 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) stated the house physician took the paper monthly physician orders summary for October, for every resident, with him when he was here Wednesday, (10/04/23) and returns them on his next scheduled visit. The DON stated that no copies of the orders were available in the charts or electronically until he returned with them, and this was a common practice of the physician, and it was done each month. Review of the facility policy titled Medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · C2019-04-25 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespread
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure reference checks for new employees were completed prior to hire. This affected four (Employees #10, #12, #19 and #29) of nine personnel files reviewed. This had the potential to affect all 37 residents. The facility census was 37. Findings include: Review of State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) # 10's personnel file revealed a hire date of 10/09/18. Continued review of the personnel file revealed the record to be silent for reference checks being completed prior to hire. Review of STNA #12's personnel file revealed a hire date of 05/31/18. Continued review of the personnel file revealed the record to be silent for reference checks being completed prior to hire. Review of STNA #19's personnel file revealed a hire date of 08/22/18. Continued review of the personnel file revealed the record to be silent for reference checks being completed prior to hire. Review of STNA #29's personnel file revealed a hire date of 01/22/18. Continued review of the personnel file revealed the record to be silent for reference checks…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · C2019-04-25 · tag F0623 — widespread
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided a transfer/discharge notification upon transfer and failed to notify the Ombudsman. This affected two (Residents #1 and #19) of two residents reviewed for hospitalization. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The census was 37. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 12/30/09. Review of progress notes dated 10/13/18 revealed Resident #1 was sent out to the hospital for possible sepsis and returned to the facility on [DATE]. The record contained no notice of transfer/discharge. 2. Medical record review for Resident #19 revealed an admission date of 10/10/16. Review of progress notes for Resident #19 revealed on 02/01/19 the resident was sent out to a behavior hospital and returned to the facility on [DATE]. The record contained no notice of transfer/discharge or notification to the Ombudsman. Interview with Social Worker Designee #35 on 04/24/19 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2019-04-25 · tag F0625 — widespread
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a bed hold notice was given to a resident upon transfer to the hospital. This affected one (Resident #19) of two residents reviewed for bed hold notification. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The census was 37. Medical record review for Resident #19 revealed an admission date of 10/10/16. Review of progress notes for Resident #19 revealed on 02/01/19 the resident was sent out to a behavior hospital and returned to the facility on [DATE]. The record contained no documentation the resident was provided with a bed hold notification. Interview with Social Worker Designee #35 on 04/24/19 at 12:32 P.M. revealed she didn't have a bed hold notice for the resident. She stated she was doing them prior to 12/01/19, but when the new company took over she didn't have one for the new company. During interview with the Director of Nursing on 04/24/19 at 1:00 P.M., it was revealed the facility did not have a policy pertaining to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$42,094 in federal fines across 7 penalties.

  • $4,938 — penalty dated 2024-02-20
  • $4,938 — penalty dated 2024-02-12
  • $13,674 — penalty dated 2024-01-22
  • $3,764 — penalty dated 2024-01-08
  • $8,469 — penalty dated 2023-12-18
  • $2,117 — penalty dated 2023-11-20
  • $4,194 — penalty dated 2023-10-30

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIONSTONE CARE — 24 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.7-0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 23 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
LIONSTONE ALS OPCO HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 07/01/2022
KAZARNOVSKY, SOLOMONIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF50%since 06/30/2022
STEIN, ABBAIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF50%since 06/30/2022
CUSNER, ADAMIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/27/2025
DEGYANSKY, JEFFREYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2020
GOLDISH, ELIEZERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/09/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$3.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-7.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$309K
Related-party expense9% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 90%Medicare 1%Other / private 9%

About 90% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $309K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$253per resident / day
operating cost
$7,701per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$237per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365606. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-10-31, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next