No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Maple Hills Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation

31054 State Route 93 North, McArthur, OH 45651 · For profit - Corporation · 42 certified beds · (740) 596-5955 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (740) 596-5955 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation at the harm level (F0740)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2364 Blizzard Ln · (740) 698-1900 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
530 N Market St · (740) 596-2566 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
630 W Main St · (740) 596-7066 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Lake Hope1.7 mi
Lake Hope · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
64698 Infirmary Rd · (740) 596-9863

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased0.0%5.3%15.4%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.2%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms84.3%30.1%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.6%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened0.0%6.1%16.1%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.3%25.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine66.7%94.5%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.7%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control12.6%21.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table5.8%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine30.8%75.6%79.4%worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.47U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.30hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.47 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 78% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.04
RN hours/ resident / day
0.47
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.72
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.23
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.57
RN hoursweekends
54.5%
Total nursing turnover
55.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 42 beds and averages 35.0 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.23 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.04 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.72 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.93 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.35 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.23 to 0.57 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-26)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2023-11-08)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

45 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2021-12-21 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident, who was displaying signs of a depressed mood, received an antidepressant as ordered by the physician. This affected one (Resident #78) of two residents reviewed for mood and behaviors. Actual harm occurred to Resident #78 when the facility failed to administer ordered antidepressant medication and antianxiety medication resulting in the resident expressing thoughts of being depressed, sleeping for extended periods of time, and being tearful when being conversed with. Findings include: A review of Resident #78's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included unspecified toxic encephalopathy, psychoactive substance abuse, and stimulant abuse with intoxication. A review of Resident #78's hospital records revealed they included a patient instruction sheet dated 12/01/21 for an admit date of 11/16/21. The resident's chronic problems included the diagnoses of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on record review, staff interview, review of a facility self reported incident form, and review of a facility job description, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented the assistance devices necessary to prevent accidents. This affected one resident (#35) of five sampled residents. The facility census was 34. Findings include:Review of the closed medical record for Resident #35 revealed an admission date of 05/22/26 and diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, malignant neoplasm of the endometrium, and history of fracture of T11-T12 vertebrae. Review of the admission five day Minimum Data Set assessment revealed a brief interview for mental status score of 14, indicating intact cognition. It further documented the resident required supervision only with transfers and walking 10 feet. Review of a facility self reported incident form revealed on 06/01/26 Resident #35 was being transported to an appointment by Activities…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility's cycle menu, review of food temperature logs, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received food that was procured from their food service supply company and was prepared in the facility's kitchen to ensure proper food handling and preparation to safe guard it from possible food-borne illnesses. This affected eight (Resident #5, #6, #11, #20, #22, #24, #31, and #35) out of 36 residents who resided in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's cycle menu for Week #1 of the Spring and Summer Menu revealed the scheduled meal for lunch on 09/16/25 included chicken tortilla rice bowl as the main entree. They were also having seasoned black beans, corn, and a Mexican Wedding Cookie. The cycle menu did not include an alternate meal choice, other than what was on the facility's alternate/ always available menu. Review of a food temperature log for the meals served on 09/16/25 revealed the dietary staff obtained hot food temperatures of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on record review, review of a facility self-reported incident (SRI), and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure pre-operative laboratory testing was completed for a resident that was scheduled to have a surgical procedure performed to address kidney stones. This affected one (Resident #38) of two residents reviewed for pre-operative surgical procedures. Findings include: Review of Resident #38's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included acute pyelonephritis (a bacterial infection of the kidney), unspecified hydronephrosis (swelling of one or both kidneys due to the backup of urine often caused by a blockage in the urinary tract such as from kidney stones), and calculus of kidney (kidney stones). Review of Resident #38's progress notes revealed a nurse's note dated 10/03/25 at 10:27 A.M. by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #113…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place per the plan of care and failed to ensure a fire blanket was available in the designated smoking area. This affected one resident (#8) out of the two residents reviewed for falls and had the potential to affect the seven residents (#1, #4, #8, #13, #17, #18, and #29) identified by the facility as smoking in the designated smoking area. The facility census was 32. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #8 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included dementia, COPD, and tobacco use. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 05/13/25, revealed the resident was assessed to have impaired cognition. Review of the care plan, dated 06/20/25, revealed the resident was at risk for falls. Interventions included a Call Do Not Fall Sign. Review of the nurses progress note, dated 05/06/25, revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-26 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and completion of a facility provided meal test tray the facility failed to provide palatable meals at the appropriate temperature. This affected all thirty-one residents who receive their meals from the kitchen with the exception of one resident (#20), who does not receive them. The facility census was 32. Findings include: Review of resident concern logs and resident council minutes on 06/24/25 revealed multiple entries of food temperature complaints. Test tray completed on 06/25/25 at 01:05 P.M. and included one beef enchilada, black beans, Mexican corn, and fruit punch. All food items were cool to taste with varying temperatures including corn temperature of 109 degrees Fahrenheit and black bean temperature of 108 degrees Fahrenheit. Both items cool to taste. Interview with Dietary Manager #699 on 06/25/25 at 1:10 P.M. verified both items did not have an appropriate temperature after being the last meal tray served. Interview with Resident #29 on 06/25/25 at 1:40 P.M. revealed her meals are served cool sometimes once she is served her meal tray…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews the facility failed to maintain all kitchen equipment in a clean, serviceable, and operational manner. This affected all residents who received meals from the kitchen with the exception of one resident (#20) who did not receive them. The facility census was 32. Findings include: Observation of the kitchen on 06/23/25 at 09:13 A.M. revealed the lift up door for the ice machine was broken and falling off when gently lifted. The overhead stove hood was visibly soiled with heavy layer of dust and multiple cobwebs hanging over the cooking area. The gas stove range was also visibly soiled with heavy dry burnt on foods from accidental spills. Interview with Dietary Manager #699 on 06/23/25 09:35 AM. verified she did not know how to remove the hood vents to clean them, and that someone was supposed to show her the process before he left but never did. Also stated the ice machine has been broken for as long as she has worked here. She also verified the stove top was visibly soiled and that there were multiple substances that had been burned onto it.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, resident record reviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents dignity was maintained while providing assistance with consuming meals. This affected one resident (#19) observed during dining experiences. The facility census was 32. Findings include: Record review for Resident #19 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and dysphagia. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/04/25, revealed the resident was assessed to have severely impaired cognition. Observation on 06/25/25 at 9:10 A.M. revealed Resident #19 was lying in bed asleep with the lights off. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #160 entered the residents room, turned on the lights, and asked Resident #19 if she was hungry. CNA #160 then set up the residents breakfast meal tray and began feeding the resident the meal while standing over her. Interview with CNA #160 at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was implemented for a resident with a tracheostomy or requiring respiratory care. This affected one resident (Resident #186) out of twelve residents reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility census was 32. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #186 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of the supraglottis, tracheostomy, bipolar disorder, anxiety, muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait and movement, dysphagia, acute embolism and thrombosis, dyspnea, obesity, and diseases of the larynx. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/10/25, revealed this resident was assessed to have intact cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 14 out of 15. Review of physician orders revealed this resident had a tracheostomy upon admission to the facility with orders for daily care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were accurately completed for residents who smoked. This affected two residents (#4 and #8) reviewed for smoking. The facility identified seven residents (#1, #4, #8, #13, #17, #18, #29) who resided in the facility and smoked. The facility census was 32. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #4 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included hemiplegia and hemiparalysis, dementia, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disorder (COPD). Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/16/25, revealed the resident was assessed to have intact cognition. Review of the facility Smoking and Safety assessment, dated 01/14/25, revealed the resident was not assessed to require the use of a smoking apron while smoking. Review of the care plan, dated 06/19/25, revealed the resident was at risk for injury related to smoking. Interventions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents who were dependent on staff for nail care and meal assistance received care in a timely and appropriate manner. This affected two residents (#2 and #19) out of the three residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). The facility census was 32. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #2 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included hemiplegia and hemiparalysis affecting the left side, dementia, and chronic pain. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data set (MDS) assessment, dated 05/07/25, revealed the resident was assessed to have impaired cognition. Review of the care plan, dated 06/10/25, revealed the resident was at risk/had an ADL self-performance deficit. Interventions included the resident was dependent for personal hygiene. Observation of Resident #2 on 06/23/25 at 1:25 P.M. revealed the resident was lying in bed. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 34 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure dialysis communication forms were utilized to ensure communication between the facility and the dialysis center. This affected one resident (#16) of one resident reviewed for dialysis. Facility census was 32. Review of Resident #16's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/23/24. Medical diagnoses included osteomyelitis, diabetes mellitus type 2, severe calorie malnutrition, alcoholic cirrhosis of liver without ascites, end stage renal disease, anxiety, anemia, dependence on dialysis, right below the knee amputation, thrombocytopenia, and atrial fibrillation. Review of Resident #16's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #16 was cognitively intact, dependent for toilet and tub/shower transfers, and required assistance for mobility and was wheelchair dependent. Review of Resident #16's care plan dated 06/06/25 revealed Resident #16 will experience no complications related to dialysis through…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of an invoice from an outside plumbing company, review of maintenance temperature logs, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure hot water temperatures were maintained between 105 degrees Fahrenheit (F.) and 120 degrees F. as required and did not pose a potential burn risk for the residents. This had the potential to affect seven residents (#2, #7, #10, #18, #20, #21, and #26), who the facility identified as having the use of the first floor shower room and five residents (#8, #9, #22, #25, and #28), who the facility identified as having the ability to utilize the sinks in their rooms on the second floor, without staff assistance. Findings include: On 04/17/25 at 9:20 A.M., an observation of the facility's boiler room located in the basement revealed there were three hot water tanks for providing hot water throughout the facility. Two of the three hot water tanks were of the same size and were a standard electric water heater. The third hot water tank was larger in size and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-04-02 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interviews, resident interviews, Ombudsman electronic communication, and policy review, the facility failed to provide sufficient staff to meet residents' needs. This affected three residents (#24, #28, and #30) of three residents reviewed for personal care needs and had the potential to affect all 33 of 33 residents in the facility. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia and hypertension. Review of a nursing note dated 03/13/25 at 4:32 P.M. by Director of Nursing (DON) revealed she was made aware Resident #30 was outside, when she went outside to check, the first floor nurse was with Resident #30. Resident #30 had wandered out the side door with construction workers because she wanted to take a walk. Resident #30 was immediately assessed and had no injuries, she was taken back into the facility, and her wander-guard was checked and working properly. All wander-guards…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the administrator's job description, observations, review of the facility vendor and supplier bills, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the facility was administered in a manner that enabled it to use it's resources effectively and efficiently including compliance with all financial obligations for the delivery of care to attain and maintain the highest practicable well being of each resident. This affected 33 of 33 residents residing in the facility. Findings included: 1. Review of information received from an anonymous complainant on 03/18/25 revealed the facility owed over $10,000 for their water bill, but due to it being a nursing facility the water department was either unable to or refused to issue a shut off notice. a .)Review of an invoice dated 04/06/24 from Stockmeister (plumbing, heating, and cooling repair company) revealed the facility owed $110 at the time of receipt for a service call related to the garbage disposal not working. Review of an invoice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the facility provided a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment for residents. This affected 33 of 33 residents residing in the facility. Findings included: Continuous observations on 03/20/25 from 8:39 A.M. to 8:49 A.M. revealed trash throughout the yard, parking lot and woods surrounding the facility. Trash including plastic grocery bags, cigarette butts, and Styrofoam food containers. There was an empty flower pot with three inches of standing water and a Styrofoam container in it with a black mold-like substance. There was a sidewalk next to the building leading to the back where the resident smoking area is. At the back corner of the building, there was a hole which appeared to be created from a water drip. The drop off into the hole was approximately three feet and the hole was starting to go underneath the sidewalk. There was no hand rail for the residents to use. Interview on 03/20/25 at 1:37 P.M. with Licensed Practical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident medical record documentation was accurate and not falsified. This affected three residents (#24, #26, and #28) of three sampled residents reviewed for accurate medical records. Findings included: Review of medical records for Residents #24, #28, and #26 revealed the director of nursing (DON) entered notes on 02/08/25 which stated Resident assessed noted no signs or symptoms of dizziness, nausea, headache, shortness of breath, confusion, or chest pains. Vital signs obtained and within normal limits. Family and MD (medical director) notified. Interview on 03/20/25 at 10:15 A.M. with the DON revealed she was on the phone with a nurse manager during the time of the gas leak incident (on 02/08/25), but she did not come to the facility. The nurse manager who was at the facility was who completed resident assessments on paper regarding the incident. Interviews on 03/20/25 with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #380 and Registered Nurse (RN) #355 at 1:21 P.M. revealed they did not look into it, but did hear the DON…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, review of the Administrator job description and personnel file and interview, the facility failed to employ a qualified administrator to ensure the facility was effectively and efficiently administered to allow all residents to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being and to ensure staff were knowledgeable of who the administrator was. This had the potential to affect all 34 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: On [DATE] between 10:45 A.M. and 12:41 P.M. interviews with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #216, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #223, and Registered Nurse (RN) #220 revealed none of the staff knew who the current facility Administrator was. The staff revealed they were not familiar with Interim Administrator (IA) #260 or Administrator #275. During the interview with the CNA, the CNA revealed she had not met IA #260 or Administrator #275. She stated she was aware there had been a new administrator…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy review and interview, the facility failed to maintain a safe, functional and comfortable environment for all residents and failed to timely address an alarming carbon monoxide detector to ensure resident safety. This had the potential to affect all 34 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 34. Findings Include: Review of the Fire Department Run Report dated 02/08/25 revealed the fire department was dispatched to the facility at 9:10 A.M. for a possible gas or carbon monoxide (CO) leak at the facility. There was no gas detected on the first floor of the facility but upon entering the basement, the multi-gas meter started alarming with carbon monoxide level at 87 parts per million (ppm) (normal/average levels 0.5-5.0 ppm). Evacuation and ventilation procedures were started. The gas was shut off at the meter by the fire department. Gas and CO level began falling rapidly once the gas was shut off and normal readings were restored. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared and served in a sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all residents that received meals from the facility's kitchen. The facility's census was 30. Findings include: On 11/01/23 at 11:02 A.M., a visit to the facility's kitchen was made to observe the pureed food process, obtain food temperatures prior to tray line and to observe the meal process. During the pureed food process, Dietary [NAME] #177 was observed to pull her N-95 mask down by grasping the outside of her mask with her bare hands. She would then raise her mask after talking to re-cover her mouth and nose. She would then handle food equipment such as pans and food processing equipment with her same bare hands without performing hand hygiene. She was also noted to touch the outside of her N-95 mask when she had gloves while handling trays used to place the residents' food on. She did not remove her gloves or performing hand hygiene before she continued with the serving of the residents' food. Findings were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-08 · tag F0644 — pattern
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Pre-admission Screening and Resident Reviews (PASARRs) were accurate, updated, and new mental health diagnoses were sent for a Level II review. This affected four residents (#6, #8, #11, and #13) of four residents reviewed for PASARRs. The facility census was 30. Findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including type II diabetes, hypertension, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, insomnia, and major depressive disorder. On [DATE], Resident #8 received a diagnosis of delusional disorders on [DATE], anxiety on [DATE], and schizoaffective disorder on [DATE]. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #8 had a PASARR completed on [DATE]. An additional PASARR was not completed to include updated mental health diagnoses. Interview on [DATE] at 3:37 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed a new PASARR had not been completed to include new mental health diagnoses. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-08 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of the menu's spreadsheet, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate serving sizes were provided in accordance with the facility's menu's spreadsheet. This affected 19 residents (#1, #3, #4, #5, #6, #8, #9, #11, #13, #14, #15, #17, #18, #21, #26, #29, #31, #32, and #136) who the facility identified as receiving regular/ no added salt/ and carbohydrate controlled diets. Findings include: On 11/01/23 at 12:40 P.M., an observation of the lunch meal process served from the facility's kitchen revealed residents receiving regular diets, no added salt diets, and carbohydrate controlled diets did not receive the appropriate serving size of zucchini and summer squash vegetable blend on their meal tray. Multiple residents' trays (for those residents on those types of diets) were observed to only receive one scoop of the vegetable blend by Dietary [NAME] #177 using a 2 oz spoodle, before being placed in a food cart to be delivered to the units. Prior to the tray line, Dietary [NAME] #177 indicated the serving size of the zucchini…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the floors in a safe manner that prevents fall hazards and keeping a homelike environment. This had the potential to affect three residents (#23, #32, and #135). The facility census was 30. Findings included: Observation on 10/31/23 at 9:58 A.M. revealed the floor in Resident #32's room was cracked, uneven, and when stepped on, had two tiles that moved and the linoleum in the bathroom had cracked and risen. Observation on 10/31/23 at 3:13 P.M. revealed the floor in Resident #135's room was bumpy and uneven. Observation on 11/01/23 at 3:23 P.M. revealed the transition strip from Resident #23's room to the hallway was missing. Interview on 11/01/23 at 3:23 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #122 confirmed missing transition strip, cracked, bumpy and uneven floors as well as shifting tiles affecting Residents #23, #32, and #135. Review of a policy titled Preventative Maintenance Program revealed the Maintenance Director is responsible for developing and maintaining a schedule of maintenance services to ensure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-08 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to provide written notice of discharge to Resident #34 and the ombudsman. This affected one resident (#34) of two residents reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 30. Findings included: Record review revealed Resident #34 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic osteomyelitis, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, anemia, hypokalemia, insomnia, major depression, and hyperlipidemia. Further review revealed Resident #34 discharged was discharged on 09/21/23. Review of the record revealed no documented evidence a written notice was given to Resident #34 or sent to the ombudsman. Interview on 11/01/23 at 10:15 A.M. with Director of Nursing verified the facility did not have record of a written discharge notice being given to Resident #34 or the Ombudsman. Review of a policy titled Transfer and Discharge (Including AMA) revealed the facility should provide a transfer/discharge…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was dependent on staff for personal care received the assistance needed with nail care. This affected one resident (#12) of two residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL's). Findings include: A review of Resident #12's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, difficulty walking, muscle wasting and atrophy, and muscle weakness. A review of Resident #12's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident did not have any communication issues and her cognition was severely impaired. She was not known to have displayed any behaviors or reject care during the seven days of the assessment period. She had a functional limitation in her range of motion of her bilateral lower extremities. A prior quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was totally dependent on two for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was receiving hospice services had relevant hospice related records (Comprehensive Assessments and Plan of Care and visit notes) readily accessible and part of the resident's medical record to ensure continuity of the resident's care. This affected one resident (#20) of one resident reviewed for hospice services. Findings include: A review of Resident #20's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included protein-calorie malnutrition, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and muscle wasting and atrophy. A review of Resident #20's physician's orders revealed he was a Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care Arrest (DNRCC-A). His physician's orders did not include an order for hospice care/ services despite the resident being identified as receiving hospice services on the facility's roster matrix. A review of Resident #20's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, facility failed to ensure new fall prevention interventions were established post-fall for two residents. This affected two residents (#24 and #32) of two residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 30. Findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, hyperlipidemia, muscle weakness, type II diabetes, hypothyroidism, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, heart failure, major depression, hypertension, anemia, and psychotic disorder with delusions. Review of minimum data set (MDS) completed on 08/16/23 revealed Resident #24 had impaired cognition, no behaviors, is occasionally incontinent of bowel, and required total dependence for activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of physician orders revealed Resident #24 used quarter bedrails for a mobility enabler, requires a low bed with floor mat to the open side of the bed, non-skid strips to the floor at bedside, and ted hose…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents, who were identified as having had significant weight loss, had new nutritional interventions implemented timely to address their known weight loss. This affected two residents (#9 and #24) of two residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings include: 1. A review of Resident #9's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included congestive heart failure, adult onset diabetes mellitus, and major depressive disorder. A review of Resident #9's physician's orders revealed she had an order to receive a frozen nutritional supplement twice a day at lunch and dinner. The nutritional intervention had been in place since 07/25/23. A review of Resident #9's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident did not have any communication issues and was cognitively intact. Her height was 60 inches and her weight was 103 pounds. She was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-08 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure artificial nutrition via gastrostomy tube (g-tube) was completed per professional standards. This affected one resident (#135) of one resident reviewed for tube feeding. The facility census was 30. Findings included: Record review revealed Resident #135 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including aphasia, down syndrome, autistic disorder, type II diabetes, respiratory disorders, hypertension, gastrostomy status, major depression, anemia, dysphagia, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, and hyperlipidemia. Review of minimum data set assessment from 10/18/23 revealed Resident #135 was dependent on staff for eating and had a feeding tube. Review of orders revealed Resident #135 had an order from 10/11/23 for a nothing by mouth (NPO) diet. On 10/11/23 the resident was ordered enteral feed order every six hours for g-tube, flush peg tube with 200 cubic centimeters (cc's) every six hours, enteral feed order every day and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-12-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a clean and sanitary kitchen. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Findings include: During the initial tour of the kitchen on 12/13/21 from 8:56 A.M. to 9:31 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #5 revealed the fridge in the kitchen and one fridge at the storage room had debris on the floor of the fridge. Further observation revealed three freezers and one fridge located in the dry storage room had debris on the floor of the freezer and the fridge. Observation on 12/15/21 at 10:30 A.M. with [NAME] #15 while preparing puree for residents, revealed [NAME] #15 had no gloves on, had the knife and measuring spoons sitting on top of the recipe sheet. Observation revealed [NAME] #15 reused spatula that she had used earlier to scrape the food from the food processor and laid it on top of the counter. [NAME] #15 was also observed touching the tip of the measuring spoons with her bare hands before dipping into the seasoning. Further observation revealed water dripping from the base of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and medical record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated with dignity and respect when the resident's soiled clothing was not changed and the resident was in a public area. This affected one resident (Resident #4) of three sampled residents reviewed for dignity. Findings include: Review of Resident #4's medical record revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Huntington's Disease, essential hypertension, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and pain. Review of Resident #4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #4's speech was clear, makes self-understood, understands others, and her cognition was moderately impaired. Resident #4 had no behaviors and did not reject care. Resident #4 required limited assistance of one staff for bed mobility, to transfer, did not walk, required supervision with set up help to eat, and was dependent on one staff to dress. Observation of Resident #4 on 12/13/21 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-21 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to conduct an admission comprehensive assessments within 14 calendar days as required. This affected two residents (Resident #228 and Resident #229) of 13 sampled residents. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #228's medical record revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: type II diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anxiety disorder, dementia with behavioral disturbance, essential hypertension, and hyper lipodema. Review of Resident #228's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 11/09/2021 was in progress and not completed. Interview of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #20 on 12/14/21 1:49 P.M. confirmed Resident #228's admission MDS was not completed within the required 14 calendar days as required. 2. Record review for Resident #229 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Type 2 diabetes mellitus, gastro esophageal reflux disease, mood disorder, pressure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-21 · tag F0638 — isolated
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to assess residents once every three months as required. This affected three sampled residents (Resident #2, Resident #4, and Resident #18) of 13 sampled residents. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: type II diabetes, mild cognitive impairment, and bipolar disorder. Review of Resident #2's Minimum Data Sets (MDS) revealed she had an annual MDS dated [DATE]. Review of Resident #2's quarterly MDS revealed it was dated 10/11/21, however this MDS was not completed until 12/07/21. Interview of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #20 on 12/14/21 at 2:22 P.M. confirmed Resident #2's quarterly MDS was not completed timely. 2. Review of Resident #4's medical record revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Huntington's disease, essential hypertension, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and pain. Review of Resident #4's MDS revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents' complete comprehensive care plans included care plans for respiratory care and pain. This affected two (Resident #22 and #25) of 15 residents reviewed for care plans. Findings include: 1. A review of Resident #25's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure (CHF), shortness of breath (SOB) and Covid-19 infection. A review of Resident #25's active physician's orders revealed she had an order to receive oxygen at 2 liters per minute (LPM) per nasal cannula every shift as needed (prn) for SOB or an oxygen saturation level (SPO2) less than 90%. The order for oxygen had been in place since 10/10/21. A review of Resident #25's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident did not have any communication issues but her cognition was moderately impaired. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents and/ or their representatives were invited to attend care planning conferences to be a part of the development of their plan of care. This affected two (Resident #18 and #78) of four residents reviewed for care planning. Findings include: 1. A review of Resident #78's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included unspecified toxic encephalopathy, psychoactive substance abuse, stimulant abuse with intoxication, anemia, history of a stroke, and acute kidney failure. Her admission record identified her sister as being her power of attorney for care. A review of Resident #78's electronic health record (EHR) revealed no documented evidence of the resident and/ or her representative being invited to attend an initial care planning conference following her recent admission to the facility. The EHR did not show evidence of any care planning conference being…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-21 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident, who was dependent on staff for assistance with personal care, received the assistance needed to be able to receive showers as she desired. This affected one (Resident #78) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL's). Findings include: A review of Resident #78's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included unspecified toxic encephalopathy, psychoactive substance abuse, and stimulant abuse with intoxication. A review of Resident #78's baseline care plans revealed she required the assist of one for bathing activities. The baseline care plan indicated the resident wanted to be showered every other day. A review of Resident #78's shower documentation revealed showers were documented under the task tab in the electronic health record (EHR) when provided. The task tab for bathing documented the resident had only received two bathing activities…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were properly positioned during meals and a resident was in an appropriate size wheelchair to allow her feet to come into contact with the floor and not dangle while she was sitting in the wheelchair. This affected two (Resident #4 and #23) of three residents reviewed for positioning. Findings include: 1. A review of Resident #23's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included cerebral palsy and lack of coordination. A review of Resident #23's physician's orders revealed she had the use of a mechanical lift for all transfers. She had an order indicating she received occupational therapy (OT) on 10/06/21 for wheelchair management. A review of Resident #23's OT notes for a date of service between 10/06/21 and 11/04/21 revealed the resident's diagnoses included cerebral palsy and abnormal posture. Her plan of treatment included wheelchair management training. The resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure fall prevention interventions were implemented as per the plan of care for a resident with a known history of falls. This affected one (Resident #78) of three residents reviewed for falls. Findings include: A review of Resident #78's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included unspecified toxic encephalopathy, psychoactive substance abuse, stimulant abuse with intoxication, convulsions obstructive hydrocephalus and cerebrovascular disease. A review of Resident #78's active physician's orders revealed there were no fall prevention interventions included in the resident's physician's orders. A review of Resident #78's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments revealed her admission and Medicare (MCR) 5 day MDS assessments were still in progress. A review of Resident #78's initial care plans revealed, in addition to her baseline care plans, she had a care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident interview, and staff interview the facility failed to provide an ordered therapeutic diet and failed to maintain a resident's nutritional status. This affected one resident (Resident #18) of one sampled residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings include: Review of Resident #18's medical record revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: non infective gastroenteritis and colitis, hypothyroidism, essential hypertension, bone disorder, anxiety, recurrent depressive disorder, recurrent depressive disorders, Parkinson's disease, and over active bladder. Review of Resident #18's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #18's speech was clear, she made herself understood, understands others, and her cognition was intact. Resident #18 had no behaviors and did not reject care. Resident #18 required limited assistance of one staff for bed mobility, to transfer, and was independent with set up help to eat. Resident #18 had no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice when two residents were receiving oxygen that was outside of the physician ordered parameters. This affected two of four residents (Residents #24 and #26) reviewed for respiratory services. Findings include: 1. A record review for Resident #26 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Resident was re-admitted to the facility from the acute care hospital following a hospitalization in October 2021. The resident had the following diagnoses: obstructive sleep apnea, hypertension, congestive heart failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A review of the Minimum Data Set admission Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed the resident had no cognitive impairment and was receiving oxygen. An observation of the resident, on 12/13/21 at 10:18 AM, revealed the resident was receiving oxygen via nasal cannula at five…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-21 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and medical record review the facility failed to conduct an assessment of a resident's bed rails and did not have evidence of maintaining a resident's side rail. This affected one Resident (Resident #18) of two sampled residents reviewed for accidents. Findings include: Review of Resident #18's medical record revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: non infective gastroenteritis and colitis, hypothyroidism, essential hypertension, bone disorder, anxiety, recurrent depressive disorder, recurrent depressive disorders, Parkinson's disease, and over active bladder. Review of Resident #18's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #18's speech was clear, she made herself understood, understands others, and her cognition was intact. Resident #18 had no behaviors and did not reject care. Resident #18 required extensive assistance of one staff for bed mobility, to transfer, and had no falls. Review of Resident #18's physician orders…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-21 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to provide medically related social services after the death of a resident's child. This affected one resident (Resident #18) of 13 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of Resident #18's medical record revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: non infective gastroenteritis and colitis, hypothyroidism, essential hypertension, bone disorder, anxiety, recurrent depressive disorder, recurrent depressive disorders, Parkinson's disease, and over active bladder. Review of Resident #18's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #18's speech was clear, she made herself understood, understands others, and her cognition was intact. Resident #18 had no behaviors and did not reject care. Resident #18 required limited assistance of one staff for bed mobility, and to transfer. Review of Resident #18's progress notes revealed on 08/06/21 Resident # 18 was notified by her sister that Resident #18's son had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-21 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's indication for use of a pain medication was clear and a resident had adequate monitoring for medications by obtaining laboratory testing as ordered. This affected two residents (Resident #18 and Resident #229) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #18's medical record revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: non infective gastroenteritis and colitis, hypothyroidism, essential hypertension, bone disorder, anxiety, recurrent depressive disorder, recurrent depressive disorders, Parkinson's disease, and over active bladder. Review of Resident # 18's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #18's speech was clear, she made herself understood, understands others, and her cognition was intact. Resident #18 had no behaviors and did not reject care. Review of Resident #18's physician orders revealed thyroid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-21 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and medical record review the facility failed to identify and track a resident's target behaviors when the resident received an antianxiety and antidepressant medication. This affected one sampled resident (Resident #18) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: Review of Resident #18's medical record revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: non infective gastroenteritis and colitis, hypothyroidism, essential hypertension, bone disorder, anxiety, recurrent depressive disorder, recurrent depressive disorders, Parkinson's disease, and over active bladder. Review of Resident #18's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #18's speech was clear, she made herself understood, understands others, and her cognition was intact. Resident #18 had no behaviors and did not reject care. Resident #18 required extensive assistance of one staff for bed mobility and to transfer. Resident #18 received an antianxiety and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-02-19 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure all essential mechanical equipment (boiler) was maintained in a functional and safe operating condition. The had the potential to affect all 34 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: Review of the boiler inspection dated [DATE] revealed Certificate of Operation expired: The Certificate of Operation is expired due to either a non-passed inspection within the last 12 months or non-payment of fees. Please contact the Division of Industrial Compliance support staff within 30 days of this order. Observation on [DATE] at 11:58 A.M. of the boiler room revealed the boiler had a red tag on it dated [DATE]. Boiler needs serviced was written on the tag. There was no further evidence of attempts by the facility to follow up on the expired Certificate of Operation for the boiler until [DATE], following surveyor intervention. On [DATE] at 1:17 P.M. information provided via email from Regional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIONSTONE CARE — 24 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.5+0.5 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.7+0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 23 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
LIONSTONE ALS OPCO HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 07/01/2022
KAZARNOVSKY, SOLOMONIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF50%since 07/01/2022
STEIN, ABBAIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF50%since 07/01/2022
CUSNER, ADAMIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/27/2025
DEGYANSKY, JEFFREYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2020
GOLDISH, ELIEZERIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/09/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$2.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-14.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$299K
Related-party expense10% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 66%Medicare 3%Other / private 30%

This home reported $299K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$269per resident / day
operating cost
$8,187per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$235per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366139. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next