Brookview Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 67 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.55 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 85% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 30% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 89 beds and averages 73.6 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.06 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.33 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.65 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.77 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.18 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.36 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on resident interview, medical record review, hospital record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received timely treatment for constipation. This resulted in actual harm after Resident #14 had no bowel movement (BM) for seven days in the facility and was admitted to the hospital the following day with abdominal pain and was found to be impacted with stool. This affected one (#14) resident reviewed for bowel movements. The facility census was 72. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 12/08/24 with diagnoses of constipation, anxiety, and generalized abdominal pain. Review of the comprehensive admission assessment completed 12/14/24 revealed Resident #14 had intact cognition and was occasionally incontinent of bowel. Constipation was not present at the time of the assessment. Resident #14's care plan, reviewed on 03/26/25, revealed a care area initiated 01/17/25 indicating Resident #14 was at risk for alteration in elimination constipation. The goal was for Resident #14 to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure infection control measures were properly utilized during wound care. This affected one (#61) of one residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 69.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #61 revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified open wound to the right ankle, muscle weakness, difficulty walking, malnutrition, psychoactive substance abuse, Charcot's joint of the right ankle, and osteomyelitis.Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #61 was cognitively intact and did not display any behaviors at the time of the assessment. She required supervision to partial assistance with activities of daily living. She required surgical wound care with dressings to her foot.Review of physician orders for Resident #61 revealed an order dated 05/16/26 for enhanced barrier precautions to be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, facility investigation information, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure timely medical follow up for residents following a fall with injury. This affected one Resident (#10) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility also failed to complete a wound dressing change per the physician's orders. This affected one (#79) of five residents reviewed for wound dressing changes. The facility census was 74. Findings include:1. Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/09/25. Diagnoses included ovarian cancer, abdominal lining cancer, general anxiety disorder, type II diabetes, major depressive disorder, adult failure to thrive, dementia, difficulty walking, unsteady on her feet, dysphagia, disorientation, and osteoarthritis.Review of Resident #10's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 indicating Resident #10 was cognitively intact. Resident #10…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure all medications ordered by the physician were administered to a resident. This affected one (#70) of eight residents review for medication administration. The facility census was 74.Findings include:Review of Resident #70's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/08/16. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, diabetes mellitus due to underlying condition with diabetic polyneuropathy, psychotic disorder with delusions, hypertension, severe protein calorie malnutrition, and muscle weakness.Review of Resident #70's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #70 had severely impaired cognition with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 03.Review of Resident #70's care plan dated 02/17/26 revealed Resident #70 was at risk for alteration in mood related to her diagnoses of anxiety, dementia, and depression with interventions that included to administer medications…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, review of manufacturer instructions, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident were not administered medications they were identified as having allergies to. This affected one (#10) of three residents reviewed for medication allergies. Additionally, the facility failed to remove medication patches prior to administering/applying another medication patch. This affected one (#78) of eight residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 74. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/09/25. Diagnoses included ovarian cancer, abdominal lining cancer, general anxiety disorder, type II diabetes, major depressive disorder, adult failure to thrive, dementia, difficulty walking, unsteady on her feet, dysphagia, disorientation, and osteoarthritis. Review of Resident #10's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received interventions to offset significant weight loss. This affected two (#31 and #60) of three residents reviewed for significant weight loss. The facility census was 72. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #31 revealed an admission date of 02/24/25 with diagnoses of dehydration and moderate protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of the initial comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/03/25, revealed Resident #31 had intact cognition and required set-up or clean-up assistance for eating. Further review of the medical record revealed Resident #31 was hospitalized overnight for altered mental status from 03/10/25 through 03/11/25. Review of the weight history for Resident #31 revealed he weighed 157.7 pounds on 03/10/25, and weighed 138.2 pounds on 03/11/25, upon return from the hospital. Review of the hospital discharge records, dated 03/11/25,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff and resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident's dialysis access sites were monitored by the facility. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure pre and post dialysis evaluations were completed. This affected two residents (#21 and #24) of two reviewed for dialysis. This facility census was 72. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record of Resident #21 revealed an admission date of 02/21/25. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease and dependence on renal dialysis. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #21 was cognitively intact, and diagnoses were listed. The assessment further indicated Resident #21 was on hemodialysis while a resident. Review of the physician orders revealed an order dated 02/24/25 to monitor the AV fistula for bruit and thrill every shift. A second order was placed on 03/25/25, after surveyor inquired, to monitor the left arm for bruit/thrill…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received medications as ordered. This affected two (#21 and #123) of eight residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 72. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #123 revealed an admission date of 03/11/25 with diagnoses of metabolic encephalopathy, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Review of the comprehensive admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/17/25, revealed Resident #123 had intact cognition. Review of a discontinued physician order, active 03/11/25 through 03/19/25, revealed Resident #123 received Lactulose Oral Solution 10 grams (gm) per 15 milliliters (ml). Give 60 ml by mouth three times daily for hyperammonemia (elevated ammonia in the blood). Review of a discontinued physician order, active 03/19/25 through 03/26/25, revealed Resident #123's Lactulose Oral Solution dose increased to 75 ml three times daily. Review of the current physician…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of pharmacy recommendations, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure timely response to pharmacy recommendations for residents on psychotropic medications. This affected three (#11, #60, and #62) of five residents reviewed for pharmacy recommendations. The facility census was 72. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record of Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 06/14/11. Diagnoses included anxiety disorder, schizoaffective disorder, major depressive disorder, paranoid schizophrenia, long-term use of opiate analgesic, and chronic pain syndrome. Review of the, Physician Recommendation Forms, the facility failed to ensure a physician addressed the recommendations of the pharmacist. On 03/09/24 the pharmacist indicated hydroxyzine 25 milligrams (mg) was ordered twice daily and was due for an evaluation for continued use. On 04/10/24 the pharmacist indicated a quarterly review was due for further use of Trazadone 150 mg at bedtime, per State and Federal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on resident interview, record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received insulin as ordered by the physician. This affected one (#123) of eight residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 72. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #123 revealed an admission date of 03/11/25 with diagnoses of metabolic encephalopathy and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Review of the comprehensive admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/17/25, revealed Resident #123 had intact cognition. Review of the baseline care plan dated 03/13/25 revealed Resident #123 had diabetes. Review of the current physician order dated 03/11/25 revealed Resident #123 received Humalog KwikPen Subcutaneous Solution Pen-Injector 100 units per milliliter (ml) (Insulin Lispro), inject 8 units subcutaneously (SQ) three times a day for diabetes mellitus (DM). The scheduled dosing times were 8:00 A.M., 11:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. Review of the current physician order dated 03/13/25 revealed Resident #123 received Humalog Injection…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff wore gloves when administering injections. This affected three residents (#21, #122, and #123) observed for insulin injections. Additionally, the facility staff did not disinfect a glucometer between resident use. This affected two residents (#21 and #122). Further, the facility failed to ensure staff wore proper personal protective equipment and practiced appropriate hand hygiene. This affected two residents (#122 and #123). The facility census was 72. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record of Resident #21 revealed an admission date of 02/21/25. Diagnoses included type II diabetes mellitus. Review of the medical record of Resident #122 revealed an admission date of 03/19/25. Diagnoses included type II diabetes mellitus. Review of the medical record of Resident #123 revealed an admission date of 03/11/25 Diagnoses included type II diabetes mellitus. Observation on 03/26/25 at 8:05 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #400 administered seven units of Humalog insulin…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIONSTONE CARE — 24 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $352K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH