Gardens At St Henry The

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 42 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 65.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.58 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 87% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 25 beds and averages 23.6 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 1 bed typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.27 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.70 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.80 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.46 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.49 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Potential for harm · E2025-09-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain a safe sanitary kitchen. This had the possibly to affect 23 out 25 residents who receive food from the kitchen. The facility identified Resident #1 and #2 did not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 25. Findings Include: Observation of the kitchen on 09/02/25 at 9:48 A.M. revealed the trash can by the food serving table had a flip lid. The here was observed multiple areas of thick food particles on the can. Observation of the kitchen freezer revealed the door handles had a red sticky substance on them as did the surface of the refrigerator behind the door handles. These findings were verified with Dietary Manager #106 at the time of the observation. Facility policy Cleanliness, undated, revealed purpose to keep the kitchen and servery as clean as possible during and after operations.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon observation and interview the facility failed to properly place a catheter bag. This affected one (#33) of one residents in the facility with a catheter. Census was 25. Records Reviews for Resident #33 revealed resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis fracture of shaft of humerus and left arm, major depressive disorder, anxiety, and panic disorder.The Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #33 was cognitively intact and was admitted with suprapubic catheter due to neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. Observation of Resident #33 on 09/02/25 at 10:38 A.M. revealed suprapubic catheter bag laying on the floor folded in half beside Resident #33's bed.Interview with RN #101 verified suprapubic catheter bag was laying on the floor beside the bed.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0694 — isolated
  Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to provide care for peripherally inserted central catheter. This directly affected one resident, #12, of one reviewed for intravenous catheters. The facility census was 25.Findings Include:Review of the medical record of Resident #12 revealed an admission date of 03/18/25. Diagnoses include urinary tract infection and Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase in urine. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #12 to be cognitively intact. The assessment indicated no intravenous catheter. Review of the physician order dated 08/25/25 revealed an order to change the midline dressing every week. The order indicated this should occur on Mondays. Interview and direct observation of Resident #12 on 09/02/25 at 8:45 A.M. revealed a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) in the right upper arm. The dressing was loose and dated 08/25/25. Direct observation and interview on 09/02/25 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure medications were securely stored. This had the potential to affect two residents, (#18 and #19), identified by the facility as being confused and independently mobile residents. The facility census was 25. Findings Include:Observation on 09/02/25 at 8:50 A.M. an antibiotic was noted on the medication cart which was located in the hallway. The cart was unattended. Registered Nurse (RN) #110 was observed to exited a resident room and verified the medication had been lying on the medication cart unattended. The medication was labeled Resident #12 and contained Ertapenem sodium (antibiotic) solution reconstituted 1 gram. Review of the policy titled Medication Storage, undated, revealed medications will be stored in a manner that ensures the safety of the residents. All medications will be stored in a locked cabinet, cart, or medication room that is accessible only to authorized personnel.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to follow infection control procedures for residents in isolation. This directly affected one resident, (#12), and had the potential to affect five residents, #01, #02, #12, #16, and #33, on isolation. The facility census was 25.Findings Include:Review of the medical record of Resident #12 revealed an admission date of 03/18/25. Diagnoses include urinary tract infection and Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase in urine. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #12 to be cognitively intact. The assessment indicated no isolation. Review of the physician order dated 08/26/25 revealed an order for contact isolation. Observation on 09/02/25 at 8:45 A.M. revealed a sign on the door to Resident #12's room indicating enhanced barrier precautions. Personal protective equipment was available for use. Observation on 09/02/25 at 9:00 A.M. revealed Registered Nurse (RN) #110 entered the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-11-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff interview and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure residents oxygen tubing was changed according to the physicians orders and the facility policy. This affected one (#15) of one resident reviewed for oxygen use. The facility census was 24. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included cerebral palsy, epilepsy, muscle weakness, hyperlipidemia, spondylosis without myelopathy, hypertension, personality disorder, fibromyalgia, and major depressive disorder. Review of the physician orders dated 06/28/21 revealed Resident #15 was to have oxygen tubing change weekly on concentrator. Review of Resident #15's medication administration record (MAR) revealed the residents oxygen tubing was to be changed weekly on Saturdays. The MAR documented Resident #15's oxygen was marked as changed on 11/05/22. Observation on 11/07/22 at 11:36 A.M., revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-11-09 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from the unnecessary medications regarding the use of an antibiotic medication without an adequate indication for use. This affected one (#17) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 24. Findings include: Review of Resident #17's medical record revealed an admission dated of 01/06/22. Diagnoses listed included epilepsy, dysphagia, aphasia, blindness, and multiple sclerosis. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #17 was severely cognitively impaired, required extensive staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADL's), and did not have a urinary tract infection (UTI) in the last 30 days. Review of MDS assessments dated 01/13/22, 04/11/22, 07/12/22, and 09/30/22 revealed Resident #17 had not had a UTI within the last 30 days of those assessments. Review of physician orders revealed an order dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIONSTONE CARE — 24 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $78K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH