No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Walnut Creek Nursing Center

5070 Lamme Road, Kettering, OH 45439 · For profit - Corporation · 139 certified beds · (937) 293-7703 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (937) 293-7703 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Oct 2023Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2023
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (54) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (61%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1551 Shore Woods Dr · (937) 435-2083 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2921 W Alex Bell Rd · (937) 991-3601 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2921 W Alex Bell Rd · (937) 294-7141 · Call to confirm hours
Park
4999 Cordell Dr · (937) 433-9969 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased2.2%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight13.9%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms20.9%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.2%3.2%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened2.3%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication32.8%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine83.7%94.5%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.2%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control14.5%21.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table19.9%8.8%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.0%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine39.6%75.6%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.4%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.4%12.9%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.541.731.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.131.801.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 49 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

57.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
53.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.45U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.18hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.21hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 53.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 32 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.45 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 76% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF57.8%CMS range 45.6–70.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.9%CMS range 6.5–14.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge53.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge62.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge40.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.1%CMS range 4.0–15.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.141.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.50
RN hours/ resident / day
0.83
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.75
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.08
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.32
RN hoursweekends
61.3%
Total nursing turnover
84.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 139 beds and averages 104.4 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 35 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.08 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.75 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.77 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.21 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.57 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 61% is well above the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-03-20)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2023-11-16)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

54 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 43 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, physician interview, review of the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP) website, the facility failed to adequately assess residents' skin, failed to identify a pressure ulcer (a pressure ulcer is a localized injury of the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction), and/or aid in the healing of existing pressure ulcers. This resulted in Actual Harm to one resident (#17) who was at risk for developing pressure ulcers, was readmitted to the facility without a pressure ulcer, and subsequently developed an avoidable, in-house acquired pressure ulcer on 01/31/25 which was first identified as a stage III (full-thickness skin loss in which adipose [fat] is visible) pressure ulcer to the sacrum. The affected one (#17) of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The census was 95 . Findings include: Review of Resident #17's medical record revealed an admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to provide skin assessments, wound treatments and wound measurements were completed in a timely manner. This affected two (#13 and #15) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcer. The facility census was 110. Findings include: 1.Review of medical record for Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 11/11/25. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, Diabetes Mellitus, anxiety, atherosclerotic heart disease and hypertension. The resident remained in the facility. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed he had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of five indicating impaired cognition. He required set up for eating, maximum assistance with bed mobility, transfers and was dependent upon staff for toileting hygiene. No pressure ulcers were documented. A care plan initiated 11/18/25 documented a risk for skin alteration related to impaired mobility with interventions which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were given as ordered. This affected one (#19) of four residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 110. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #19 revealed admission date of 1/9/26. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, right femur fracture and hypertension. The resident remained in the facility. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed he had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of seven indicating impaired cognition. He was independent with eating, required supervision for bed mobility, moderate assistance for transfers and maximum assistance toileting hygiene. Review of the physician orders revealed an order for two Senna Plus (laxative/stool softner) tablets with a start date of 01/10/26. Observation on 01/24/26 at 9:34 A.M. of medication administration for Resident #18 by Licensed Practical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to accurately monitor and track infections in the facility. This had the potential to affect all 107 residents in the facility. The facility census was 107.Findings include:Review of the Infection Control tracking Logs for June 2025, July 2025, and August 2025 revealed infections were monitored and there was no Coronavirus (COVID-19) or Tuberculosis (TB) in the facility. There were no Infection Control Logs for September 2025, October 2025, November 2025, December 2025 and January 2026.Review of the COVID-19 positive residents dated 11/26/25, revealed there were four residents who tested positive for COVID-19 in November 2025. Interview on 01/08/26 at 9:26 A.M., the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) / Infection Preventionist #311 confirmed there were no Infection Control tracking logs or Infection Location surveillance/maps for September 2025, October 2025, November 2025, December 2025, and January 2026. Interview also confirmed that the facility had COVID-19 in late November 2025 and December 2025…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the refrigerators were clean and free from expired foods. This had the potential to affect 106 residents with exception of Resident #42 who the facility identified as being nothing by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 107.Findings include: Observation on 01/08/26 at 2:37 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed the resident refrigerator on the 100-Hall, Skilled Hall and 200-Hall was dirty, with a moist hand towel lying inside the refrigerator on the top shelf, with brown stains scattered throughout the towel. There were four personal containers of various food items, unlabeled and undated. There were multiple bottles of opened, iced coffee in the refrigerator without names or dates noted on the bottles, there was no expiration date present on the bottles. The attached freezer was noted with a frozen red substance on the floor of the freezer. The thermometer was laying upside down, on the floor of the freezer, and was stuck and unable to move. There were two cups of Dairy Queen ice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation was completed when a resident eloped from the facility. This affected one (Resident #89) out of one resident reviewed for elopement. The facility census was 107.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #89 revealed an admission date of 09/12/25. Diagnoses included cardiac arrhythmia, cerebral infarction (stroke), essential hypertension, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety.Review of the Elopement Evaluation for Resident #89 completed on 09/12/25 revealed the resident was at risk of elopement.Review of the care plan for Resident #89 dated 09/22/25 revealed the resident had impaired cognition as evidenced by deficits in memory, judgement, decision making related to Dementia and was at risk for elopement and resided on a secured Memory Care Unit (MCU). Interventions included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were developed and accurate. This affected two (Residents #14 and #63) out of three residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 107.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 12/12/25, Diagnoses included abscess of lung without pneumonia, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, and unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition.Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #14 was cognitively intact. Resident #14 was independent with eating and lost more than five percent (%) weight in the last month and 10 % in the last six months and was not on prescribed weight loss regimen. There were no nutritional approaches.Review of the physician orders for Resident #14 dated 12/12/25 revealed the resident was ordered to receive a regular diet, regular texture, thin consistency diet.Review of Resident #14's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure neurological (neuro) assessments were completed for residents following unwitnessed falls. This affected one (Resident #110) out of four residents reviewed for assessments. The facility also failed to ensure a resident was properly assessed for a change in condition prior to a hospital transfer. This affected one (Resident #07) out of the four residents reviewed for change in condition. The facility census was 107.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #110 revealed an admission date of 09/11/24. Diagnoses included Diabetes Mellitus Type II, Vascular Dementia, and Hypertension. Resident #110 was discharged from the facility on 11/08/25.Review of the medical record dated 08/01/25, revealed Resident #110 experienced an unwitnessed fall. Review of the Post-Fall Evaluation for Resident #110 dated 08/01/25 revealed the resident sustained a hematoma (collection or pool of blood that gathers…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, review of video footage, review of personnel files, review of Self- Reported Incidents (SRI), and policy review, the facility failed to ensure timely required checks were completed on residents throughout the shift, failed to ensure residents were assessed following an unwitnessed fall and prior to moving the resident off of the floor and placing her back in the bed, failed to ensure the staff appropriately transferred residents following an unwitnessed fall and failed to ensure a post-fall assessment was completed following an unwitnessed fall. This affected one (Resident #01) out of three reviewed for falls. The facility census was 107.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #01 revealed an admission date of 02/26/25 with diagnoses of cerebral atherosclerosis, unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety, encephalopathy, unspecified, dysphagia, oropharyngeal phase,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the common dining environment was conducive for residents eating in the dining room. This affected two (Residents #24, and #63) out of the six reviewed for dining. This had the potential to affect all 16 residents who ate in the main dining room. The facility census was 107.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #24 revealed an admission date of 09/29/25. Diagnoses included major depressive disorder, permanent atrial fibrillation, adjustment disorder with anxiety, and essential hypertension.Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #24 was cognitively intact, required set-up assistance for meals and was on a mechanically altered diet.Review of the medical record for Resident #63 revealed an admission date of 02/02/24 with diagnoses of diffuse traumatic brain injury with loss of consciousness status unknown, sequela, dysphagia, oral phase, dysphagia, pharyngeal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered per physician orders and that medication errors were below five percent (%). This affected three (Residents #11, #47, and #112) out of four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 107.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 07/31/25 with diagnoses of cerebral palsy, gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis, and major depressive disorder. The resident was dependent on staff for medication administration. Review of the physician orders for Resident #11 dated 07/31/25 revealed the resident was ordered to receive 30 milliliters (mL) of Mylanta (heartburn and indigestion) maximum strength oral suspension (400 milligrams (mg) aluminum hydroxide, 400 mg magnesium and 40 mg simethicone) per five mL. twice daily.Review of the medical record for Resident #47 revealed an admission date of 11/11/25 with diagnoses of anemia, cyst of pancreas, gastritis, unspecified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 43 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were served food to meet their needs. This affected one (Resident #104) out of three residents reviewed for proper diets. The facility census was 107.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #104 revealed an admission date of 05/17/22 with diagnoses of vascular dementia, moderate, with other behavioral disturbance, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified, essential (primary) hypertension, and adult failure to thrive. Review of the physician order dated 01/13/25 revealed Resident #104 was ordered to receive a regular diet, mechanical soft texture, regular consistency with regular texture food / snacks as desired with supervision. Review of the Care Plan dated 06/09/25 revealed Resident #104 was at risk for malnutrition/alteration in nutritional status related to dementia with behaviors, history of failure to thrive, depression/anxiety, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and cerebrovascular accident. The resident received…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of facility's Self-Reported Incidents (SRI) and investigation, resident interviews, review of personnel file, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the residents were treated with respect and dignity. This affected two (#34 and #40) of five residents reviewed for abuse and dignity. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #34 revealed an admission to 08/30/24 with medical diagnoses of Parkinson's disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and depression. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #34 was cognitively intact and was dependent upon staff for toilet hygiene, bathing, bed mobility, and transfers. Resident #34 was always incontinent with bladder and bowel. Review of the facility's SRI number 265729, dated 09/26/25 at 5:08 P.M., revealed on 09/25/25 at 7:30 P.M., Resident #34 stated Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #210 failed to provide cares/services for Resident #34 as requested. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews, resident and staff interviews, review of facility Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs) and investigation, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff immediately reported allegations of abuse to administration and failed to complete a thorough investigations into allegations of abuse. This affected two (#34 and #105) of five residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 103.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #34 revealed an admission to 08/30/24 with medical diagnoses of Parkinson's disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and depression. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #34 was cognitively intact and was dependent upon staff for toilet hygiene, bathing, bed mobility, and transfers. Resident #34 was always incontinent with bladder and bowel. Review of the facility's SRI number 265729 and investigation, dated 09/26/25 at 5:08 P.M., revealed on 09/25/25 at 7:30 P.M., Resident #34 stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff had there hair contained in food preparation areas and failed to ensure food was stored properly. This had the potential to 98 out of 98 residents who receive their meals/food from the kitchen, the facility identified one resident (#30) that did not receive food from the kitchen. The census was 99. Findings include: Observations of the kitchen on 05/21/25 at 2:14 P.M. revealed Dietary Aide (DA) #150 preparing meals trays and DA #160 arranging drink cups and preparing drinks. Neither DA #150 or DA #160 had were wearing hairnets or had their hair contained. Interview with DA #150 on 05/21/25 at 2:19 P.M. confirmed she was not wearing a hairnet. DA #150 stated her hairnet must have fell off. Interview with Dietary Director (DD) #170 on 05/21/25 at 2:29 P.M. confirmed DA #150 and DA #170 were not wearing hairnets and did not have their hair contained in the food preparation area. DD #170 stated hairnets were required at all times in the kitchen. Further observation on 05/21/25 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place for a resident who was at risk for falls and had recent falls. This affected one (#69) of the three residents reviewed for accidents. The census was 95. Findings include: Review of Resident #69's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/05/24. Diagnoses listed included psychotic disorder, cognitive disorder with Lewy bodies, anxiety disorder, depressive disorder, and muscle weakness. Review of a care plan for Resident #69 dated 11/18/24, revealed the resident was at risk for falls and potential injury related to dementia, impaired balance, impaired cognition, medications, poor decision-making skills, unsteady gait, history of falls, and keeps eyes closed when walking. An intervention of anti-rollbacks to the resident's wheelchair was implemented on 02/03/25. Review of a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #69 dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered per physician's order. This affected one (#71) resident out of the five residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 95. Findings Include: Review of medical record for Resident #71 revealed an admission date 09/04/25. Diagnoses included acute respiratory failure, obstructive and reflux uropathy, acute and chronic respiratory failure, pleural effusion, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, morbid obesity, and sleep apnea. Review of a physician order for Resident #71 dated 12/04/24 and discontinued on 01/24/25, revealed the resident had an order for Midodrine five milligrams (mg) by mouth every eight hours as needed (PRN) for hypotension related to systolic blood pressure less than 100 millimeters or mercury (mm/Hg), and do not give the medication four hours before bedtime. Review of a physician order for Resident #71 dated 01/01/25, revealed the resident was ordered to have a blood pressure taken twice daily (morning and night) and check…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure abnormal involuntary movement scale (AIMS) assessments were completed as ordered. This affected two (#69 and #76) of the five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility also failed to ensure an ordered stop date for an as needed (PRN) antianxiety medication was implemented. This affected one (#69) of the five residents reviewed for unnecessary mediations. The census was 95. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #69's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/05/24. Diagnoses listed included psychotic disorder, cognitive disorder with Lewy bodies, anxiety disorder, depressive disorder, and muscle weakness. Review of a monthly medication review (MMR) dated 11/26/24, revealed Resident #69 was currently receiving the antipsychotic medication Risperdal and recommended an AIMS assessment be completed due to this antipsychotic therapy requiring an AIMS assessment. The MMR was signed by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the proper storage of medications when outdated and expired medications were being stored in the medication carts. This affected two (#47 and #70) residents of the five residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 95. Findings Include: Review of medical record for Resident #70 revealed an admission date 03/21/24. Diagnoses included depression, type two diabetes, anemia, and hypertension. Review of record for Resident #47, revealed an admission date 11/19/24. Diagnoses included heart failure, depression and atrial fibrillation. Observation of the 100-hall medication cart on 03/19/25 at 10:55 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #117, revealed an Insulin Aspart (fast acting insulin) 100 units per milliliter belonging to Resident #70 with an open date of 02/06/25. Interview with LPN #117 at the same time verified Resident #70's insulin was opened 02/06/25. Observation of the 200-hall medication cart on 03/19/25 at 11:24 A.M. with LPN #32, revealed a container Potassium Chloride 10…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, review of online resources from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and review of facility policy, the facility failed to timely implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). This affected three (#14, #17, and #46) residents of five reviewed for Transmission-Based Precautions (TBP). The census was 95. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #17's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/16/18. Diagnoses listed included malnutrition, cerebral palsy, chronic kidney disease stage 3, dysphagia, and atherosclerotic heart disease. Review of a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #17 was cognitively intact, was receiving Hospice services and did not have any pressure ulcers. Further review of Resident #17's medical record, revealed a stage III (full-thickness skin loss in which adipose [fat] is visible) pressure ulcer to the resident's sacrum was identified on 01/31/25 and treatments were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical records review, staff interview, observation, review of facility policy, and review of Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, the facility failed to ensure staff wore appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) while caring for a resident who was positive with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). This affected one (#1) out of three residents reviewed for infection control. The census was 90. Findings include: Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/24/24. Diagnoses listed included cerebral atherosclerosis, hypertension, vascular dementia, and chronic kidney disease. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 was severely cognitive impaired and receiving Hospice services. Review of physician orders revealed an order dated 01/13/25 for contact and droplet precautions due to COVID-19. Review of progress notes dated 01/13/25 at 12:36 P.M. revealed Resident #1 tested positive for COVID-19 with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-03 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed and parameters were met prior to the administration of insulin resulting in significant medication errors. This affected one resident (#10) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. Facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #10 revealed admission date of 06/21/24. Diagnoses include diabetes mellitus with skin complications, congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, and hypertension. Resident #10 was admitted to hospice on 08/26/24 for a diagnosis of senile asthenia. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of seven out of 15. Resident #10 required extensive two-person assistance for transfers, one person assistance for bed mobility, dependent for toileting and independent for eating. Medications documented injections were received seven of seven days…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observations and staff interview the facility failed to ensure residents were administered as ordered resulting in two medication errors out of 25 opportunities or an eight percent (%) medication error rate. This affected two (#18 and #19) out of of four residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 88. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #18 revealed admission date of 04/18/23. Diagnoses include alcoholic hepatic failure without coma, traumatic subdural hemorrhage, bipolar disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, depression and chronic respiratory failure. The resident remained in the facility. Observation of medication pass on 01/18/24 at 8:15 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #118 for Resident #18 revealed she was given Amlodipine (blood pressure) 10 milligrams (mg), Keppra (seizures) 750 mg, Lisinopril (blood pressure) 20 mg, Metformin (diabetes) 500 mg, Senna (laxative) 8.6 mg and Zyprexa (antipsychotic) 2.5 mg. Further review of Resident #18's physician orders revealed an order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-18 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record reviews, observations, staff interview and review of medication information from Medscape, the facility failed to ensure antipsychotic and/or blood pressure medications were administered as physician ordered resulting in significant medication errors. This affected three (#15, #13, #18) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 88. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #18 revealed admission date of 04/18/23. Diagnoses include alcoholic hepatic failure without coma, traumatic subdural hemorrhage, bipolar disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, depression and chronic respiratory failure. Observation of medication pass on 01/18/24 at 8:15 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #118 for Resident #18 revealed she was given Amlodipine (blood pressure) 10 milligrams (mg), Keppra (seizures) 750 mg, Lisinopril (blood pressure) 20 mg, Metformin (diabetes) 500 mg, Senna (laxative) 8.6 mg and Zyprexa (antipsychotic) 2.5 mg. Further review of Resident #18's physician orders revealed an order for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-11-16 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure QAA meetings were conducted at least quarterly and all required members were in attendance. This had the potential to affect all 85 residents of the facility. The facility census was 85. Findings included: Review of the QAA meeting information revealed the facility conducted a QAA meeting first and second quarter of 2023 with all required members present at the meetings. Review of the Ad hoc QAA meeting attendance sheet, dated 11/08/23, revealed the medical director was not present for the meeting. Further review of the QAA meeting information revealed no documentation to support the facility conducted a QAA meeting in the fourth quarter of 2022. Interview on 11/16/23 at 3:46 P.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #501 confirmed the Medical Director was not present for the Ad Hoc QAA meeting on 11/08/23. RN #501 also confirmed there was no documentation to support the facility conducted a QAA meeting in the fourth quarter of 2022. Review of the policy titled,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-16 · tag F0638 — pattern
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record reviews, staff interviews, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual 3.0, the facility failed to compete quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments within the required time frame. This affected four (#21, #39, #46 and #77) of the 19 residents reviewed for timely completion of MDS assessments. The facility census was 85. Findings included: 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #39 revealed an admission date of 01/26/17 with medical diagnoses of dementia, diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension (HTN), and hypothyroidism. Review of the medical record for Resident #39 revealed a quarterly MDS assessment with assessment reference date (ARD) of 08/19/23 which indicated Resident #39 was cognitively intact and required supervision with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, and toileting. Review of the quarterly MDS revealed a completion date of 09/20/23. 2) Review of the medical record for Resident #46 revealed an admission date of 01/18/18 with medical diagnoses of DM, Alzheimer's disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, HTN, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 manual, the facility failed to complete comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments within the required timeframe. This affected two (#40 and #57) of the 19 residents reviewed for timely completion of MDS assessments. The facility census was 85. Findings include: 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #40 revealed an admission date of 08/09/18 with medical diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, hypertension (HTN), heart failure, and chronic kidney disease stage III. Review of the medical record for Resident #57 revealed an annual MDS with assessment reference date (ARD) of 10/14/23 which indicated Resident #40 had severe cognitive impairment and required set-up to supervision with transfers, bed mobility, toileting and eating. Further review of the MDS revealed a completion date of 11/10/23. 2) Review of the medical record for Resident #57 revealed an admission date of 09/07/23 with medication diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF), HTN, diabetes mellitus, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 manual, the facility failed to ensure resident interviews were conducted for cognition Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and for mood 9-Item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) as required by RAI manual. This affected two (#57 and #77) of the 19 residents reviewed for Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accuracy. The facility census was 85. Findings include: 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #57 revealed an admission date of 09/07/23 with medical diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF), hypertension (HTN), diabetes mellitus, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the medical record for Resident #57 revealed an admission MDS assessment with assessment reference date (ARD) 09/25/23 which indicated the facility did not complete resident interviews for BIMS or PHQ-9 and the resident interviews were dashed. Review of the MDS assessment revealed staff interviews were not conducted to determine Resident #57's BIMS or PHQ-9. 2) Review of the medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to accurately fill out a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) for Residents. This affected one (#68) of the five residents reviewed for PASARR. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Resident #68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of acute kidney failure, amnestic disorder due to known physiological condition, metabolic encephalopathy, need for assistance with personal care, muscle weakness, bipolar disorder, alcohol dependence with alcohol-induced persisting dementia, non-pressure chronic ulcer of right heel and midfoot, schizoaffective disorder, and pseudobulbar affect. Review of the Minimal Data Set (MDS) assessment 3.0 dated 09/25/23 revealed Resident #68 had moderate cognitive impairment. Her functional status is listed as totally dependent for transfers, bed mobility, and toileting. The MDS also revealed Resident #68 was incontinent of urine and bowel and assessed with no pressure ulcers. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews, staff interviews, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual 3.0, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive person-centered care plans. This affected three (#31, #77, and #87) of the 19 residents reviewed for comprehensive person-centered care plans. The facility census was 85. Findings included: 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #31 revealed an admission date of 08/18/23 with medical diagnoses of malignant neoplasm of prostate, secondary malignant neoplasm of bone, non-pressure chronic ulcer of left foot, and hypertension (HTN). Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 08/25/23 for Resident #31, revealed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment and required limited staff assistance with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, and toileting. The MDS assessment did not indicate Resident #31 had any skin issues. Review of a physician's progress noted dated 10/23/23 for Resident #31,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, staff and resident interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide dependent residents with bathing needs. This affected two (#01 and #37) of the four residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). The facility census was 85. Finding included: 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #01 revealed the resident had an original admission date of 06/07/22. Diagnoses included, but not limited to, cerebral palsy, Parkinson's disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes type 2, morbid obesity, malignant neoplasm of bladder, gastroesophageal reflux, schizoaffective disorder, chronic diastolic heart failure, chronic kidney disease, bipolar disorder, anxiety, gout, and auditory hallucination. Review of the comprehensive plan of care dated 05/30/23 for Resident #01, revealed the resident had an ADL self- care performance deficit related to activity intolerance, fatigue, and impaired balance with an intervention to encourage…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to complete weekly skin assessments and the facility failed to complete wound treatments as ordered by the physician for a resident's surgical site. This affected one (#31) of the six residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 85. Finding included: Review of the medical record for Resident #31 revealed an admission date of 08/18/23 with medical diagnoses of malignant neoplasm of prostate, secondary malignant neoplasm of bone, non-pressure chronic ulcer of left foot, and hypertension. Review of a skin evaluation assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #31 revealed the resident had skin issues to the toes on the resident's right foot. The medical record revealed no documented evidence that the facility completed any weekly skin assessments after the resident's admission on [DATE]. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #31 revealed an assessment reference date (ARD) of 08/25/23 which indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to complete weekly skin assessments and monitoring of pressure ulcer as per facility policy. This affected one (#77) of the two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 85. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #77 revealed an admission date of 05/31/23 with medical diagnoses of schizophrenia, moderate protein calorie malnutrition, and hypertension. Review of the weekly skin assessments from 06/02/23 to 06/25/23 for Resident #77, revealed the facility completed the weekly skin assessments. There were no documented weekly skin assessments or monitoring of the resident's Stage IV pressure ulcer to coccyx after 06/25/23 and before the resident was seen by the wound physician on 08/21/23. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 09/07/23 for Resident #77, revealed the resident was dependent on staff or required extensive staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's tube feeding was administered per physician orders. This affected one (#25) of two residents reviewed for tube feeding. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #25, revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but not limited to, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, diabetes mellitus, morbid obesity, unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition, major depression, anxiety disorder, osteoarthritis, dysphagia oropharyngeal phase, gastroparesis, cerebral palsy, celiac disease, and gastrostomy. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment 3.0 dated 09/07/23 for Resident #25, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score 15, implying no cognitive impairment. Further review revealed no behaviors exhibited, no rejection of care and no wandering. Resident #25 received 51 percent or more total calories…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to administer and document as needed (PRN) psychotropic medications for an appropriate indication, failed to implement non-pharmacological interventions prior to administration of PRN psychotropics and failed to timely evaluate and monitor the effectiveness of antipsychotic medications for residents. This affected three (#26, #37 and #46) of the six residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. The facility census was 85. Finding Include: 1) Record review of Resident #26 revealed an original admission dated of 07/14/2023 with diagnosis's including but not limited to: metabolic encephalopathy, vascular dementia, bipolar disorder, adult failure to thrive, chronic atrial fibrillation, type two diabetes, sleep apnea, hallucination, and orthostatic hypotension. Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #26 revealed no behaviors, rejection of care or wandering. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a Frazier Water Protocol (protocol to allow residents with dysphagia to freely consume thin liquid water with supervision) was followed per resident preference and as physician ordered. This affected one (#21) of one residents reviewed for hydration. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of Resident # 21's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/09/2020. Diagnoses included, but not limited to, chronic kidney disease, dysphagia, aphasia, anoxic brain damage, unspecified atrial fibrillation, hypertension, blindness in right eye, type II diabetes, muscle weakness and major depressive disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #21 required partial or moderate assistance with eating. Review of a physician order dated 05/10/21 revealed Resident #21 was ordered a Frazier Water Protocol after meals for dysphagia. Additionally, Resident #21 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews, review of the facility's Self-Reported Incident (SRI), and policy review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from sexual abuse. This affected one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for sexual abuse. The facility census was 92. Findings include: Closed medical record review for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 04/14/22. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting the left dominant side, dementia, depression, and Alzheimer's disease. Resident #1 was sent to the emergency room on [DATE] at 4:21 P.M. and the family will transfer Resident #1 to another facility upon discharge from the hospital. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 was severely cognitively impaired with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of seven. Resident #1 required extensive assistance from staff with bed mobility, transfers, and toilet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observations and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to provide wound care treatment as ordered by the physician. This affected two (#110 and #176) residents out of the three reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 92. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #110 revealed an admission date of 05/19/23 with medical diagnoses of morbid obesity, hypertension, and depression. Review of the medical record for Resident #110 revealed a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/19/23, which indicated Resident #110 was cognitively intact and required extensive staff assistance with bed mobility, transfers, toileting, and was dependent upon staff for bathing. The MDS did not contain documentation to support Resident #110 had any pressure ulcers or skin issues. Review of the medical record revealed a wound physician note, dated 09/07/23, which stated Resident #110 had chronic ulcers of right foot. Further review of the medical record revealed a wound physician note, dated 09/21/23, which stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-05-25 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure call lights were answered in a timely manner by any staff available and trained to complete the task. This affected three resident rooms (#301, #308 and #310) of three resident rooms reviewed for call light response. Findings include: Observation on 05/18/21 at 8:24 A.M. revealed room call lights for rooms 301, 308 and 310 were activated for assistance. Observation on 05/18/21 at 8:27 A.M. of Registered Nurse (RN) #106 and License Practical Nurse (LPN) #204 continued standing at the medication cart and prepared medications. At 08:29 AM continued to sound for room [ROOM NUMBER], 308 and 310 alerting staff members of activation. Observation on 05/18/21 at 8:30 A.M. the Director of Nursing (DON) and Unit Manager #105 walked onto the unit and by the rooms with the call light activated. Neither staff responded to the call lights. At 08:34 A.M. the call lights for room [ROOM NUMBER], 308 and 310 continued to sound in the hallway and on the call…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, family interview, observation, and review of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines, the facility failed to ensure residents who were recently admitted to the facility were put on quarantine status. This affected three residents (#140, #258, and #292 ) of four reviewed for newly admissions. The facility Census was 99. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #140 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart beat irregularity, high blood pressure, and falls. There was no evidence the resident had received the COVID-19 vaccination. Observation on 05/10/21 at 10:30 A.M. revealed Resident #140 was in a private room. There was no isolation cart with personal protective equipment (PPE) outside of the resident's door, or a sign on the door indicating the resident was on quarantine status. Interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #105 on 05/10/21 at 2:30 P.M. revealed Resident #140 had received the first vaccination for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-25 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to notify the resident and the contact party of a room change. This affected two residents (#63 and #75) of 20 residents reviewed. The facility census was 99. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #63's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/05/20. Diagnoses included chronic pulmonary disease, major depressive disorder, anxiety, and chronic pain. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #63 was cognitively intact, had no behaviors, and required extensive assist with one-person physical assist. Resident #63 had a responsible party emergency contact. Further review of the medical record revealed there was no notification to the resident or the responsible party prior to a room change. Interview on 05/10/21 at 11:25 A.M., Resident #63 reported he was moved a week ago due to an incident happening with the former roommate. He was not given a notice in advance of his room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-25 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of the Notice of Medicare Non Coverage forms, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure timely notification was made to the resident or residents representative of the discontinuation of skilled services. This affected two residents (#08 and #05) of three reviewed for beneficiary notice. The facility census was 99. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #08 revealed an admission date on 07/25/20. Diagnoses included Covid-19 (history), history of falls, restless leg syndrome, hypertension, schizoaffective disorder, insomnia, major depressive disorder, and vascular dementia. Review of the document titled Notice of Medicare Non Coverage (NOMNC) revealed skilled services would end for Resident #08 on 02/04/21. Further review of the document revealed the resident or the resident representative had not signed the required document. Additionally, a letter attached to the NOMNC on the facility letter head dated 03/11/21 stated this letter was the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to report an allegation of resident to resident abuse. This affected two residents (#61 and #63) of 21 reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 99. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #61 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's Disease, mixed receptive language, cognitive communication deficit and alcohol dependence. Review of Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #61 was moderately impaired with no physical or verbal behaviors exhibited. Review of the nurse notes dated 12/26/20 revealed Resident #61 was upset with staff and stated he was going home. Resident #61 was unable to be redirected by staff. Review of the nurse notes dated 05/06/21 revealed Resident #61 was using profanity towards staff and throwing objects off of the bedside table. Review of the Care Plan revealed Resident #61 was verbally abusive towards staff, exhibited verbal aggression…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-25 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of resident to resident abuse. This affected two residents (#61 and #63) of 21 reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 99. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #61 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's Disease, mixed receptive language, cognitive communication deficit and alcohol dependence. Review of Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #61 was moderately impaired with no physical or verbal behaviors exhibited. Review of the nurse notes dated 12/26/20 revealed Resident #61 was upset with staff and stated he was going home. Resident #61 was unable to be redirected by staff. Review of the nurse notes dated 05/06/21 revealed Resident #61 was using profanity towards staff and throwing objects off of the bedside table. Review of the Care Plan revealed Resident #61 was verbally abusive towards staff, exhibited…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-25 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided a written notice of reason for the transfer. This affected one resident (#257) of two residents reviewed for transfer. The facility census was 99. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #257 revealed an admission date on 04/15/21. Diagnoses included cystitis (urinary tract infection), repeated falls, injury of falling, acid reflux, [NAME] cell (skin cancer) carcinoma, and hearing loss. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. The resident required extensive assistance of two people for bed mobility, supervision for transfers, and extensive assistance for toileting with one staff member. The resident was coded as having one fall with no injuries in the look back period. Review of the plan of care dated 04/15/21 revealed the resident was at high risk for falls. Interventions included anticipate and meet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-25 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI), the facility failed to timely complete resident minimum data set (MDS) assessments as required. This affected three (#49, #55 and #27) of three residents reviewed for timely completion and submission of the MDS to Centers of Medicare and Medicaid. Facility census was 88. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #49 revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses including high blood pressure, abnormal heart rhythm, heart failure and heart disease. Review of the admission MDS dated [DATE] for Resident #49 revealed the assessment was completed on 08/02/21 instead of 07/30/21 as required by the RAI manual. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #55 revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, diabetes, major depressive disorder, and anxiety. Review of the admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #55 revealed the assessment was completed on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-25 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) reflecting the current health care status. This affected one resident (#48) of three residents reviewed for MDS accuracy. The facility census was 99. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #48 revealed an initial admission date on 02/26/17 with discharge on [DATE] and a readmission on [DATE] due to fecal impaction and urinary tract infection. Diagnoses included peripheral vascular disease, cellulitis of left lower leg, chronic gout, peripheral neuropathy, benign prostatic hyperplasia with urinary tract infections, chronic kidney disease edema, dysphagia, metabolic encephalopathy, chronic pain, convulsion, hypertension, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. Review of the plan of care 01/08/19 revealed the resident had an indwelling catheter due to neurogenic bladder. Interventions include change catheter as ordered, monitor intake and output per policy, and resident uses an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-25 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline plan of care and provide a summary to the resident within 48 hours after admission. This affected one resident (#247) of one resident reviewed for baseline plan of care. The facility census was 99. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #247 revealed an admission date of 05/05/21. Diagnoses included abdominal aortic aneurysm without rupture, anxiety, anorexia, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and lung cancer. Resident is the responsible party listed in the electronic health record. Review of the baseline plan of care dated 05/05/21 revealed a partially completed document without any signatures of facility staff members, resident or the resident representative. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. Resident #247 required limited assistance for bed mobility and transfers. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure the type and location of dialysis site access was addressed in the comprehensive care plan. This affected one resident (#38) of two residents who received dialysis. The census was 99. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #38 revealed an admission date of 04/28/15. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease on hemodialysis, diabetes mellitus type two, and vascular dementia. Review of the active physician orders revealed an order dated 02/23/21 for Resident #38 to receive hemodialysis on Tuesday and Thursday. Further review of the active physician orders revealed there were no orders indicating Resident #38's type and location of dialysis site access. Review of the quarterly minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #38 was cognitively intact and received dialysis. Review of Resident #38's comprehensive care plan revealed a focus of Resident #38 need for dialysis related to end…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care was revised to include an accurate dialysis schedule, accurate medication usage, and constipation issues. This affected two residents (#38 and #48) of 29 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The census was 99. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #38 revealed an admission date of 04/28/15. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease on hemodialysis, diabetes mellitus type two, and vascular dementia. Review of the quarterly minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #38 was cognitively intact and received dialysis. Review of the active physician orders revealed an order dated 02/23/21 for Resident #38 to receive hemodialysis on Tuesday and Thursday. Review of the comprehensive care plan revealed a focus of Resident #38 needs for dialysis related to end stage renal disease. Further review of the comprehensive care plan revealed Resident #38 received…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-25 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure a discharge summary was provided to residents upon discharge. This affected one resident (#89) of four residents reviewed for discharge/hospitalization. The facility census was 99. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #89 revealed an admission date of 03/29/21. Diagnoses included diabetes mellitus type two, hypertension, and cerebral infarction. Review of the admission minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #89 had moderate cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance with activities of daily living. Review of the health status note dated 04/14/21 at 12:11 P.M. revealed Resident #89 discharged home and all belongings and medication went with the resident. Review of the medical record for Resident #89 revealed no evidence of a discharge summary having been provided to Resident #89 upon discharge. Interview with the Unit Manager #701 on 05/18/21 at 11:50 A.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure residents were provided timely incontinence care. This affected two residents (#60 and #71) of two residents reviewed for incontinence care of 44 incontinent residents. The facility census was 99. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #60 revealed an admission date of 04/10/18. Diagnoses included chronic kidney disease stage three, diabetes mellitus type two, and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. Review of the annual minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #60 was cognitively intact, required limited assistance with activities of daily living, required total dependence assistance with bathing, and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Interview with Resident #60 on 05/11/21 at 11:18 A.M. revealed she was left wet in her bed for extended periods of time. Interview with State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #332 on 05/17/21 at 2:08 P.M. revealed she worked on day shift and frequently…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-05-25 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview, and policy review the facility staff failed to monitor a dialysis access site. This affected one resident (#38) of two residents who received dialysis. The census was 99. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #38 revealed an admission date of 04/28/15. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease on hemodialysis, diabetes mellitus type two, and vascular dementia. Review of the quarterly minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #38 was cognitively intact and received dialysis. Review of the active physician orders revealed an order dated 02/23/21 for Resident #38 to receive hemodialysis on Tuesday and Thursday. Review of the active physician orders revealed they had no documentation of the type and location of the residents dialysis access site as well as any orders to monitor the dialysis access site. Review of the Medication Administration Record and Treatment Administration Record dated 04/01/21 through 05/17/21 revealed no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure medication was stored in a secure manner away from resident access. This had the potential to affected seven residents (#31, #26, #28, #55, #74, #44 #255) who the facility identified as independently mobile and confused of 15 who resided on the memory care unit and six residents (#246, #251, #5, #8, #24, #34) of 47 residents residing on the 100 and 200 halls. The facility census was 99. Findings include: 1. Observation on 05/10/21 at 12:05 P.M. of the nursing supply room located on the 100 hall. The door to the supply room was unlocked. Inside the room, was a metal storage cabinet unlocked that contained multiples of nasal decongestant, ear drops, deep sea nasal spray, milk of magnesia, polyethylene laxative, calcium antacid, metricida plus 30 chemical, aspirin 81 milligram (mg) 36 bottles, ferrous sulfate elixir, antacid liquid, Mucinex expectorant, and MiraLAX single use packets for the facility stock supply. Interview on 05/10/21 at 12:10 P.M., with LPN #212 verified the metal cabinet should be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIONSTONE CARE — 24 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.7-0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 23 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
LIONSTONE CARNATION OPCO HOLDINGS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 06/28/2024
KAZARNOVSKY, SOLOMONIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF50%since 06/28/2024
STEIN, ABBAIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF50%since 06/28/2024
CROSS RIVER BANKOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTERESTsince 06/28/2024
HUNTER, RACHELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/28/2024
VALENTINE, ANTHONYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/16/2026
KLUGMAN, JACOBIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/16/2026
STEIN, SHALOMIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/16/2026
STERNBUCH, DANIELIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/16/2026
LIONSTONE CARNATION PROPCO HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/28/2024
PEACE CAPITAL HOLDINGS II LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/28/2024
SMS 2021 TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/28/2024
WALNUT CREEK SNF PROPCO LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/28/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-42.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$309K
Related-party expense3% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 63%Medicare 3%Other / private 34%

This home reported $309K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$327per resident / day
operating cost
$9,930per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$229per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365821. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next