Lila Doyle Post Acute

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

66.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 412 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 52.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 205 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.65 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 90% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 93.5 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.71 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.96 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.89 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2023-11-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record review, document review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident (R)2) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for abuse was not sexually abused by a visitor of the facility. On 10/30/2023, a certified nursing assistant (CNA) witnessed a visitor fondle (stroke or caress lovingly, or erotically) the breast of a cognitively impaired resident, R2. Instead of immediately intervening to separate the resident from the visitor, the CNA left the resident alone in their room to report the incident to a nurse, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)6. LPN6 then removed the resident from their room but did not escort the visitor out of the facility, as listed in the facility's abuse policy. The visitor hung around the facility and was later observed to be in close proximity of the resident and offered R2 some ice cream. One hour and nine minutes after CNA8 observed the visitor fondle the breast of R2, the visitor left the faciity on their own accord. It was determined the facility's non-compliance with one or more requirements of participation caused, or was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2026-02-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to assess a resident to determine the level of supervision required while outside and ensure the environment was safe. On 11/22/2025, Resident (R)4, a resident with severe cognitive impairment, was taken outside by a staff member and left without direct supervision of staff. The staff failed to ensure the gate that enclosed the area was secured and the resident's wheelchair brakes were locked. R4 rolled down a hill, fell out of their wheelchair, and sustained an impacted left femoral neck fracture. The facility failed to ensure fall risk interventions were implemented for R2 and R8. These deficient practices affected 3 (R2, R4, and R8) of 6 sampled residents reviewed for accidents.Findings included: A facility policy titled, Fall Management System revised 04/2025, revealed, This facility is committed to promoting resident autonomy by providing an environment remains as free of accident hazards as possible. Each resident is assisted in attaining or maintaining…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-11-05 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record review, document review, and policy review, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation following an allegation of sexual abuse for 1 resident (Resident #2) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Abuse: Prevention of and Prohibition Against, revised in October 2022, revealed, 4. All allegations of abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation will be promptly and thoroughly investigated by the Administrator or his/her designee. The policy specified, 5. The investigation will include the following; * An interview with the person(s) reporting the incident; * An interview with the resident(s); * Interviews with any witnesses to the incident, including the alleged perpetrator, as appropriate; * A review of the resident's medical record; * An interview with staff members (on all shifts) who may have information regarding the alleged incident; * Interviews with other residents to whom the accused employee provides care or services or who may have information…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to promote the dignity of 1 (Resident (R) 6) of 1 resident who was observed with staff standing while assisting the resident to eat. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Rights: Respect and Dignity, dated 10/04/16, revealed . You have the right to be treated with respect and dignity . reside and receive services in the facility reasonable accommodation of your needs and preferences . Review of R6's admission Record located in the resident's electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, revealed R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but was not limited to; Alzheimer's disease with late onset, encounter for palliative care, need for assistance with personal care, lack of coordination, and disorders of muscle. Review of R6's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 06/08/23, located in the resident's EMR…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement the care plan for 1 (Resident (R)43) of 1 resident reviewed for skin conditions. Specifically, the failure to apply the skin protection devices placed R43 at risk for additional skin tears. Findings include: Review of R43's Medical Diagnosis, located in R43's electronic medical record (EMR) found in the Medical Diagnosis tab, revealed R43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but was not limited to; diabetes, heart failure, and pressure ulcer. Review of a Nursing Note dated 05/01/23 at 5:08 AM and located in the Progress Notes tab of R43's EMR, noted, . When changing the pt's [patient's] PICC (Special IV line) dressing, while removing the tegaderm it was noticed that she had a 4x2 skin tear that was actively bleeding, approx. [approximately] 2 cm (centimeters) above the pt's PICC insertion side. While using sterile technique, bordered gauze was applied to tear. Review of a Nursing Note dated 06/07/23…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident (R)135) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for nutrition and/or hydration status had accurate care plans. This placed R135 at risk for choking and/or aspiration related to the consistency of liquids. Findings include: Review of Medical Diagnosis located in R135's electronic medical record (EMR) and under the Diagnosis tab, revealed R135 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but was not limited to; dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing) and dementia. Review of Physicians Orders located in R135's EMR under the Orders tab and dated 06/27/23, documented, . Special Instructions: MEDS CRUSHED IN APPLE SAUCE .MECHANICAL SOFT DIET NECTAR THICK CONSISTENCY, no straws . Review of Physicians Orders located in R135's EMR under the Orders tab and dated 07/12/23, documented, . Monitor for signs of aspiration pna [pneumonia]: lungs sounds, increased cough, vs [vital signs] . Review of R135's Speech Therapy SLP Discharge…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident (R) 135) of 6 residents observed receiving medications, received nectar thick liquids with the medication pass as ordered by the physician. This placed R135 at risk of choking and aspiration. Findings include: Review of Medical Diagnosis located in R135's electronic medical record (EMR) under the Diagnosis tab, revealed R135 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but was not limited to; dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing) and dementia. Review of Physicians Orders located in R135's EMR under the Orders tab and dated 06/27/23, revealed, . Special Instructions: MEDS CRUSHED IN APPLE SAUCE . MECHANICAL SOFT DIET NECTAR THICK CONSISTENCY, no straws . Review of R135's Speech Therapy SLP Discharge Summary Discharge Recommendations and Status, dated 07/06/23, documented, . Oral intake Solids = Puree consistencies .Liquid = Nectar thick liquids . During an observation of the medication pass on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident (R)5) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for vaccinations were up to date with the pneumococcal vaccination. This placed R5 at increased risk for serious illness related to respiratory infections. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure physician standing orders for the pneumococcal vaccine were individualized to the resident. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Immunizations-Influenza and Pneumococcal revised on 10/2022, revealed, . For Pneumococcal Immunizations refer to the CDC (Centers for Disease Control) website: Pneumococcal Vaccination: Summary of Who and when to vaccinate or Pneumococcal Vaccination Timing for Adults . Two types of Pneumococcal vaccines are available for adults: Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccines (PCV13, PCV15, and PCV 20) . Pneumococcal Polysaccharide Vaccine (PPSV23) . The resident or the resident's representative has the opportunity to decline…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

$22,838 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $13,520 — penalty dated 2026-02-04
• $9,318 — penalty dated 2023-11-05

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in SC