Creekview Health And Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 43 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 46.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 32 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 63% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 91 beds and averages 75.4 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.37 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.89 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.82 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.59 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.71 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 67% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure two dietary aides had a protective facial hair covering while working in the kitchen, failed to ensure food items were properly labeled (name, date opened, or expiration date), failed to ensure frozen food items were stored at a temperature for frozen food items to remain frozen solid which had the potential to affect 71 of 72 residents, and failed to ensure an expired nutritional supplement was discarded and unavailable for resident use on 1 of 2 medication carts observed.The findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Sanitary Standards-Dietary Personnel, revised 7/2016, revealed .It is the policy of this facility .dietary personnel will be required to follow additional sanitary standards .Hair restraints .beard restraint .must be worn at all times while in the kitchen .Review of the facility's policy titled, Food Storage, revised 8/2019, revealed .It is the policy of this facility .Foods shall be labeled, dated .Dates used may be a date prepared/opened and/or used by date…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0557 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 resident (Resident #19) was treated with dignity during feeding assistance of 7 residents observed for dining.The findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Rights, undated, revealed .You have the right to be treated with dignity and respect in a manner that promotes or enhances your quality of life .Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinsonism, Spastic Quadriplegic Cerebral Palsy, and Dementia. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #19 scored a 12 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Further review revealed Resident #19 was dependent on staff for eating. Review of the comprehensive care plan for Resident #19 revised 6/30/2025, revealed .ADL [Activities of Daily Living] Self Care Performance Deficit r/t [related to]…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of medical record, and interview, the facility failed to resubmit a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) after the resident was admitted to the facility with a mental health diagnosis for 1 resident (Resident #11) of 8 residents reviewed for PASRR. The findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, PASRR Policy and Procedure Program, undated, revealed .To ensure compliance with federal and state regulations regarding the .PASRR process for individuals seeking admission .particularly those with serious mental illness (SMI), Intellectual disability (ID), or related conditions (RC) .policy applies to all admissions to the SNF [Skilled Nursing Facility] .Resident Review .conducted when there is a .change in the resident's condition .may trigger a new PASRR evaluation.Review of a PASRR Level I Screen for Resident #11 dated 3/3/2020 (submitted prior to admission to the facility), revealed the resident had .Anxiety Disorder .Psychotropic Medications…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility policy, record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 resident (Resident #82) of 19 residents reviewed for care plans.The findings include:Review of the facility policy titled, Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Planning, dated 12/2023, revealed .facility.shall develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that includes.information necessary to properly care for each resident.Review of the medical record revealed Resident #82 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Region Stage 4, Chronic Hepatitis C, and Herpes Viral Infection of Urogenital System. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #82 scored a 14 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Further review revealed the resident had a pressure ulcer and viral…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility policy, review of manufacturer guidelines, medical record review, observations, and interviews the facility failed to ensure insulin medication was labeled appropriately to include an open date for 2 residents (Resident #46 and Resident #23) and failed to ensure eye medication was labeled appropriately to include an open date for 1 resident (Resident #67) of 3 residents reviewed for medication administration on 1 medication cart of 2 medication carts observed.The findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Labeling and Storage, dated 2001, revealed .The nursing staff is responsible for maintaining medication storage .in a .safe .manner .Medications are stored .and are labeled accordingly .Review of the manufacturer guidelines, undated, revealed .HOW SUPPLIED/STORAGE AND HANDLING .Storage Conditions for TRESIBA FlexTouch [Degludec] [medication used to treat diabetes] .In-use (opened) .Room Temperature .56 days .Storage conditions for .NovoLog [Insulin…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility policy, medical record review, observations and interviews the facility failed to ensure staff followed infection control guidelines during wound care for 1 resident (Resident #44) of 3 residents reviewed for wounds. The findings include:Review of the undated facility policy titled, Wound Care, revealed .Put on exam glove. remove dressing .Pull glove over dressing and discard.sanitize hands.put on gloves .Review of the medical record revealed Resident #44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Dementia, and Hypertension. Review of the Physician's Orders for Resident #44 dated 4/26/2025, revealed .cleanse sacrum with normal saline, pat dry, apply calcium alginate and collagen particles to wound bed and cover with foam dressing three times per week and as needed.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #44 scored 00 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-06-28 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the Facility Assessment, review of facility's daily staffing sheets, review of facility shower schedules, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate staffing on the weekends to meet the needs of residents in the facility for 2 months (May and June 2022), which had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment updated 4/25/2022, showed the average daily census was 60. Licensed nurses and Certified Nurse aides (CNA) providing direct care total number needed or average range correlates to census number; staff will be assigned to meet needs of all residents. Review of the facility assignment sheets dated 5/1/2022-5/31/2022 and 6/1/2022-6/27/2022 showed the facility had fewer CNA's working on the weekends. Review of the facility's shower schedule revised 6/15/2022, showed Resident #29 was to receive a shower on Wednesday and Saturday on dayshift (7:00 AM- 3:00 PM). Review of Resident #29's shower…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-06-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to properly store frozen foods in 1 of 1 freezer, failed to date 3 containers of dried foods in the kitchen area, and failed to maintain proper temperatures in 2 of 2 nourishment refrigerators, potentially affecting 58 of 60 residents in the facility. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Food Storage-Dry Goods, dated 10/2019, showed .The Dining Services Director or designee ensures .the storage .date marked as appropriate . Review of the facility policy titled, Food Storage .Cold, dated 10/2019, showed .all food items are stored properly .arranged in a manner to prevent cross contamination . During an observation of the walk-in freezer on 6/26/2022 at 9:20 AM, with the Regional Director of Dietary Services revealed the following: 1. A 2-pound bag of peas, spilled in the box and open to air with freezer burn (covered in ice crystals). 2. An 8-pound ribeye open to air with freezer burn. 3. 15 4-ounce chicken breasts open to air with freezer burn. 4. 14 fish fillets open to air with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility policy, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to include a urinary catheter for 1 resident (Resident #12), to include Activities of Daily Living (ADL) for bathing for 4 residents (Residents #14, #29, #52, and #210), and to include use of psychotropic medications for 1 resident (Resident #35) of 20 residents reviewed for care plans. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans, dated 1/2/2020, revealed .It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment .The comprehensive care plan will be developed within 7 days after the completion of the comprehensive MDS [Minimum Data Set] assessment .…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-06-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, facility shower schedule review, and interview, the facility failed to provide scheduled showers for 4 residents (Residents #14, #29, #52, and #160) of 10 residents reviewed for showers. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Bathing a Resident, dated 1/2/2020, showed .It is the practice of this facility to assist residents with bathing to maintain proper hygiene and help prevent skin issues . Resident #14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive pulmonary Disease, Hypertension, Repeated Falls, and Abnormalities of Gait and Mobility. Review of Resident #14's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], showed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. She was totally dependent with one staff member assistance for bathing. Review of the facility's shower schedule…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 25% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TN