Mesa Springs Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 86 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 73.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 65 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.42 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 71% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 89 beds and averages 68.3 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.45 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.02 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.00 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.63 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and records reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident to ensure the comprehensive care plan described the services and interventions to be used to attain and maintain the resident's practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 (Resident #6) of 3 residents reviewed for care plans. The care plan for Resident #6 did not adequately address his interventions to describe how to meet his needs when transferring resulting in a fracture to right arm. This deficient practice placed residents at risk of not having care needs met, which could cause a decline in physical and psychosocial health and serious injury. Findings include: Record review of Resident #6's Face Sheet, dated 10/04/2023, revealed an [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #6's diagnoses included Unspecified displaced fracture (pieces of the bone moved so much that a gap formed around the fracture) of the surgical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement their written policies and procedures regarding allegations of abuse/neglect for one (Resident #1) of seven residents reviewed for abuse/neglect. The facility did not report an incident of neglect to the state agency within the given time frame. These failures could place all residents that access the facility van. The findings included:Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet, dated April 14, 2026, revealed a [AGE] year-old female with the latest admission date of 08/24/2025. Her diagnoses included Hemiplegia, unspecified affecting right dominant side (a type of paralysis that affects one side of the body, often resulting from brain damage due to conditions such as a stroke or injury); and ataxic gate (an unsteady, irregular walking pattern caused by cerebellar dysfunction, leading to poor coordination and balance); and cognitive communication deficit (difficulty in communications that arise from impaired cognitive functions). Record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-03-19 · tag F0851 — widespread
  Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow guidelines for mandatory submission of staffing information based on payroll data in a uniform format. Long-term care facilities must electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, including information for agency and contract staff, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data in a uniform format according to specifications established by CMS, for 1 of 1 (FY Quarter 4 2025) reviewed for Staffing Data Report. The facility failed to submit staffing information to CMS for FY Quarter 4 2025 (October 1- December 31). The facility's failure could place residents at risk for personal needs not being identified and met, decreased quality of care, decline in health status, and decreased feelings of well-being within their living environment. The findings included: Review of the facility's Staffing Data Report for FY Quarter 4 2025 (October 1- December 31) reflected the facility triggered for Failed to Submit Data for the Quarter. Review of the facility's PBJ nurse staffing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 3 (Resident #19, Resident#24 and Resident#31) of 12 residents reviewed for quality of care.The facility failed to ensure Resident #19 and #24's nasal canula was properly stored while oxygen was not in use on 03/17/2026.The facility failed to ensure Resident #31's nebulizer mask was properly stored while not in use on 03/17/2026. These failures could place residents on oxygen therapy at risk of receiving incorrect or inadequate oxygen support and decline in health.The findings include:1. Record review of Resident #19's admission Record dated 03/18/2026 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE].Record review of Resident #19's History and Physical dated 11/25/2025 revealed resident had a diagnosis of hypoxic respiratory failure (a life threating condition where the lungs cannot adequately transfer…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-19 · tag F0700 — pattern
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to review the risks and benefits of bed rails with the resident or a resident representative and obtain informed consent prior to installation for 3 of 5 residents (Resident #2, Resident #3, and Resident #6) reviewed for bed rail consents. 1. The facility failed to obtain informed consent, or maintain evidence that, Resident #2 and Resident #3 or their representative had been provided with sufficient information so that they could make an informed decision prior to installing bed rails.2. The facility failed to obtain informed consent from Resident #6 when bed rails were installed on his bed. Informed consent was obtained 17 days after bed rail safety evaluation was performed and 23 days after physician order was obtained. This failure could place residents at risk of not being able to make an informed decision due to not having sufficient information on the risks of bed rail usage.Findings included:1. Record review of Resident #2's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-19 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received, and the facility provided food and drink that was palatable, attractive, and at safe and appetizing temperatures for reviewed food and nutrition services.The facility failed to adhere to their policy for acceptable serving temperatures on 03/17/26.This failure could place residents at risk of food-borne illnesses, decreased appetite, and overall meal dissatisfaction.Findings included:In an observation on 03/17/26 at 12:10 PM, the Meal Cart for the 100-hall left the kitchen into the 100-hall. The last tray was observed to be served by staff into their room at 12:23 PM. All sample trays were tested for temperature and all meal entrees were under the serving temperature per facility policy. All trays were in transported in a meal cart with the plate covering on. On 03/17/26 at 12:25 PM, the Food Sample Trays tested at the following: Mechanical diet- 114 F Steak Fritters, 118 F [NAME] Beans, and 111 F Red Potatoes; Regular diet- 130 F Steak Fritters, 115 F [NAME] Beans, and 117 F…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen in the facility.1.The facility failed to date a tray of covered cups of milk and fruit cups on 03/17/26.2. The facility failed to keep 2 boxes of Vanilla pudding cups off the floor in the walk-in pantry on 03/17/26.3. The facility failed to ensure the steam table was clean and free from food particles on 03/17/26.4. The facility failed to ensure cookware was properly rinsed and sanitized in adherence to professional standards for food service safety on 03/17/26.These failures could place residents at risk of food-borne illnesses.Findings include:During the brief initial kitchen interview on 03/17/26 at 8:55 AM, the following observations were made: a serving tray with multiple cups of milk covered with plastic wrapping, 3 small bowls of served fruit covered with plastic wrapping, and a cup of gelatin, located in the walk-in refrigerator, was not dated; 2 boxes of Vanilla puddings on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet, attain, and/or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 2 of 16 residents (Resident #2 and Resident #3) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2, and Resident #3 had a care plan in place for bed rails. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk of not receiving individualized care and services to meet their needs.Findings included:1. Record review of Resident #2's electronic face sheet, dated 03/18/2026, reflected an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side (left sided weakness or immobility following a stroke), and muscle weakness, Record review of Resident #2's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-06 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to voice grievances to the facility or other agency or entity that hears grievances without discrimination or reprisal and without fear of discrimination or reprisal for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #312) reviewed for grievances. The facility failed to ensure a grievance was completed for Resident #312's complaint of LVN A. This failure could place residents at risk for not having their grievances resolved. The findings included: Record review of Resident #312's electronic face sheet indicated a [AGE] year-old female, who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a current admission date of 05/31/25. Resident #312's medical diagnoses included dementia, asthma, weakness, chronic kidney disease, stage 4 severe, pressure ulcer on left buttock, difficulty swallowing, type 2 diabetes mellitus, Parkinson's disease, heart failure, anemia, high blood cholesterol, high blood pressure, gout, cognitive communication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-06 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures to prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and misappropriation for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #312) reviewed for developing and implementing neglect policies. The facility failed to follow its policy to investigate and report to the Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) when Resident #312's family member alleged that LVN A neglected Resident #312. This failure could place residents at risk of not having allegations thoroughly investigated per policy. Findings included: Record review of Resident #312's electronic face sheet indicated a [AGE] year-old female, who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a current admission date of 05/31/25. Resident #312's medical diagnoses included dementia, asthma, weakness, chronic kidney disease, stage 4 severe, pressure ulcer on left buttock, difficulty swallowing, type 2 diabetes mellitus, Parkinson's disease, heart failure, anemia, high blood…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of the residents for 1 of 1 medication room and 1 of 3 (treatment cart) medication carts reviewed for drugs and biologicals. 1. The facility failed to ensure 1 vancomycin IV bag (antibiotic medication in bag for IV) had been removed from the medication room when it had expired on December 2024. 2. The facility failed to ensure 6 boxes of lancets (needles used to obtain small blood samples) were removed from the medication room when they had expired on or after 08/27/2020. 3. The facility failed to ensure 12 IV start kits (used to start IVs) were removed from the medication room when they had expired on 12/10/2024. 4. The facility failed to ensure 8 packages of lubricating jelly (used for lubrication) were removed from the medication room when they had expired on 12/02/2024. 5. The facility failed to ensure 1 tube of Anasept gel (topical solution that fights bacteria and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,190 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,190 — penalty dated 2023-10-12

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $648K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX