Legacy Rehabilitation and Living

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 72 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 75.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 48 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.10 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 97% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 150 beds and averages 119.9 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 30 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.24 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.81 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.80 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.42 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-05-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the resident's environment remained as free from accident hazards as possible and that each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 (Resident #1) of 2 residents reviewed for accident hazards. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was properly secured/fastened in the facility van resulting in bodily injury to the head, arm, stomach, and leg of Resident #1. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 05/04/2026 at 4:47 PM. The IJ template was provided to the OM on 05/04/2026 at 5:21 PM. While the immediate jeopardy was lifted on 05/05/2026 at 3:23 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm and a scope of isolated because all transportation staff had not been trained on 05/05/2026. The Plan of Removal (POR) of IJ will be included in the findings. This failure could place residents at risk for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to report to the State Survey Agency an allegation of neglect involving a fall with injury within 2 hours of the allegation for 1 (Resident #1) of 1 resident.The facility failed to report a fall with an injury on [DATE] for Resident #1.This failure could place residents at risk of not having incidents of abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property being reviewed and investigated in a timely manner by the facility and state survey agency. This could place residents at risk of continued and/or unrecognized abuse, neglect, or exploitation.Findings Included:Resident #1Record review of Resident #1's face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had a medical history of encounter for orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation (multi-phase process aimed at protecting the surgical site, promoting healing, and preparing for rehabilitation and prosthetic use), end stage…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-05 · tag F0837 — isolated
  Establish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the governing body of the facility had appointed an Administrator, who is licensed by the state, to be responsible for the management of the facility and report to the governing body. The facility had not had an Administrator since March 2026. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of decreased quality of life and quality of care due to lack of staff oversight and monitoring of care for all 128 residents at the facility. The findings included: Record review of the facility employee list printed on 5/1/26 by the facility revealed there was no ADM listed. In an interview on 5/1/26 at 8:40 am the former ADM stated he was not the ADM over the building anymore and had his license pulled from the building in March. He stated it had been over 30 days since the facility had had an ADM at the facility. He stated he did not know who the possible new ADM would be. He stated a new ADM had not been officially onboarded, which meant hired. During an interview on 5/1/26 at 10:25 am, the HRD confirmed the former ADM…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning, is provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences for 1 (Resident #1) of 8 residents reviewed for respiratory care.The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received O2 via NC continuously as ordered by her physician.This failure could place residents who receive oxygen at an increased risk of hypoxemia (low levels of oxygen in the blood, decreasing the oxygen supply to vital organs), and shortness of breath.Findings Included:Record review of Resident #1's admission record dated 01/21/26 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, single subsegmental thrombotic pulmonary embolism without acute cor pulmonale (blockage in the small branch of the pulmonary artery…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-09 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs for 1 (Resident #1) of 8 residents reviewed for unnecessary drugs.The facility failed to discontinue 4 medications (mirtazapine, escitalopram, tizanidine, and tramadol) as documented in the physician orders in Resident #1's hospital discharge records dated 08/01/25.This failure could place residents at risk of harm due to medication side effects and/or medication interactions.Findings Included:Record review of Resident #1's admission record dated 09/09/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] from an acute care hospital. She had diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, metabolic encephalopathy (problems in the brain from chemicals in the blood), acute pancreatitis (sudden inflammation of the pancreas resulting in severe abdominal pain), acute kidney failure (sudden episode of kidney failure that happens in hours or days), and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-31 · tag F0576 — pattern
  Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to send and receive mail, and to receive letters, packages and other materials delivered to the facility through a means other than the postal service for 13 of 13 anonymous residents reviewed for Resident Rights The facility failed to ensure mail and packages from the U.S Postal Service were delivered to residents on Saturdays.The facility failed to ensure mail and packages delivered by means other than the postal service were delivered to residents on Saturdays and Sundays.These failures could cause residents to experience loneliness, depression, missing property and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: In a Resident Council meeting on 07/30/2025 at 2:00PM, 13 anonymous residents stated they had not received mail on Saturdays. One anonymous resident stated Act E delivered the mail to them Monday through Friday. Another anonymous resident stated packages delivered at a time other than 8AM-5PM, Monday through Friday, sat in the foyer of the facility until Act E returned to work on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 (LVN A, CNA B, and CNA C) of 6 staff observed for resident care LVN A did not wear a gown when administering medications through Resident #11. CNA A and CNA B did not wear a gown when providing catheter care for Resident #86. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of cross-contamination and infections. Findings include: Resident #11:Record review of Resident #11's clinical record revealed a [AGE] year-old female resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include metabolic encephalopathy (a chemical imbalance in the blood that causes problems in the brain), herpes viral encephalitis (a rare but serious inflammation of the brain caused by the herpes simplex virus (HSV)), cerebral infarction…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, the facility failed to report an alleged violation of abuse/neglect immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation resulted in serious bodily injury, to officials in accordance with State law, including to the State Survey Agency for one (Resident #1) of 9 residents reviewed for abuse/neglect. The facility failed to report that Resident #1 alleged that she had been raped on 1-22-2025. The noncompliance was found to be Past Non-Compliance (PNC). The noncompliance began on 1-22-2024 and ended on 2-2-2024. The facility corrected the noncompliance before the investigation began. This failure could result in delayed identification of abuse or neglect and lack of timely follow-up on recommended interventions to prevent serious bodily harm, or lasting physical impairment. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 2-4-2025 revealed a [AGE] year-old female resident admitted to the facility originally…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review; the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 2 of 3 medication carts (2C-1 and 100 Skilled medication carts) observed. -1 loose pill (Meloxicam)discovered in 2C-1 medication cart. -2 loose pills (Flexeril and unidentified pill) and a packet of 50 (Methadone) pills not double locked. These failures could result in residents' medications not being properly stored and maintained at their best therapeutic level. Findings include: Observation on 06/05/24 at 08:41 AM of Medication cart 2C-1, 1 loose pill was discovered, and MA D was able to identify medication as Meloxicam (an anti-inflammatory medication to help with arthritic pain). Interview on 06/05/24 at 08:49 MA D stated that a negative outcome for having loose pills in the medication cart. MA D stated that it could lead to a missed medication dose for the resident. Observation on 06/04/24 at 11:59 AM of medication cart for 100 skilled Hall revealed 2 pills and a small packet of 50…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-06-07 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the menu was followed, for 2 out of 5 residents that received pureed food (Resident # 19 and 21), and one resident (#16) who had a mechanical soft diet in the Alzheimer's unit in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 19 received a pureed pancake for breakfast on 6/5/24. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #16 received toast with her breakfast on 6/5/24. 3. Residents #16, 19 and # 21 received pudding for the lunch dessert instead of cream pie and pudding for the supper meal instead of the chocolate chip cookie the other residents received for 6/5/24. Residents #16,19 and 21 did not receive sweet potato casserole for lunch. 4. Residents #16, 19 and #21 received pudding for the lunch meal on 6/6/24 instead of the dessert empanada. 5. Residents #16, 19 and #21 received jello for the lunch meal on 6/6/24 instead of the mixed berry cake. These failures could place residents at risk for unwanted weight loss, hunger,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1 of 21 residents (Resident #94) reviewed for resident's rights. -CNA A was standing next to Resident #94's Geri-chair while feeding resident his lunch time meal. This failure could cause residents to feel humiliated and disrespected. Findings include: Record Review of Resident #94's clinical records revealed a [AGE] year-old male resident who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #94 had the following diagnosis of personal history of transient ischemic attack (TIA), and cerebral infarction (stroke) without residual deficits, Hemiplegia (muscle weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body that can affect the arms, legs and facial muscles) and Hemiparesis (a nervous system disorder that causes a person to have a relatively mild loss of strength on one side of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$13,070 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $13,070 — penalty dated 2026-05-05

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX