No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Lampstand Nursing and Rehabilitation

2001 E 29th St, Bryan, TX 77802 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 140 certified beds · (979) 822-6611 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
2 immediate-jeopardy citations2 immediate-jeopardy citations CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$31,460 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $31,460 in federal fines (most recent 2025-10-10)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (97%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
(979) 779-4756 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2601 Osler Blvd · (979) 485-9123 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased27.0%15.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.8%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.9%0.3%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.4%0.8%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.8%2.4%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%3.3%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened20.0%14.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.2%18.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.5%3.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control13.2%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.5%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.6%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine90.7%88.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission28.4%25.7%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit31.8%12.3%12.0%worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

34.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 43 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

34.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.37U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.20hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 63% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF34.4%CMS range 21.6–50.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.6%CMS range 8.3–15.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened7.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.1%CMS range 3.8–13.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.491.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.45
RN hours/ resident / day
0.74
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.13
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.33
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.39
RN hoursweekends
97.3%
Total nursing turnover
100.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 140 beds and averages 77.6 residents a day — about 55% occupied, or roughly 62 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.33 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.13 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.75 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.57 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 97% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-10)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2025-02-12)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

52 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-10-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the care and supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 7 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #1 was repositioned with two-person assist and left in an unsafe position when CNA A walked away from the bedside on 9/15/2025. The noncompliance was identified as Past Noncompliance (PNC). The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 1:25PM. The IJ began on 9/12/2025 and ended 9/15/2025. The facility corrected the noncompliance before the survey began on 10/08/2025. This failure placed residents at risk for accidents, falls, fractures, and diminished quality of life.Findings Include: Record Review of Resident #1's Facesheet dated 10/08/2025 revealed a 37 y/o male, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included unspecified convulsions, schizophrenia, weakness, and personal history of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Record review of Resident #1's admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-10-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for 1 of 7 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #1 was provided pharmacy services to ensure that he did not have a preventable seizure on 9/14/2025 at 8:10AM. The noncompliance was identified as Past Noncompliance (PNC). The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 1:25PM. The IJ began on 9/12/2025 at 11:22PM and ended 9/15/2025. The facility corrected the noncompliance before the survey began on 10/08/2025. This failure placed residents at risk for seizures, hospitalization and death.Findings Include: Record Review of Resident #1's Facesheet dated 10/08/2025 revealed a 37 y/o male, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included unspecified convulsions and personal history of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Review of Resident #1's admission MDS, dated [DATE], reflected no BIMS score, indicating…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-04-30 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide and document an effective discharge planning process that focused on the resident's discharge goals, the preparation of the residents to be active partners and effectively transition them to post discharge care, and the reduction of factors leading to preventable readmissions for 1 of 6 (Resident #1) of residents reviewed for safe discharge. On 4/26/2024 the facility discharged Resident #1 from the facility pending a hearing for an appeal. The facility transported Resident #1 and all of his belongings to RP1's home. There was no one at the home who was able to accept Resident #1, the facility left the resident sitting outside of the home that was located on a busy street. Resident #1 was considered blind, was moderately cognitively impaired, was at risk for elopement with a previous history of elopement. The facility failed to ensure a safe discharge for Resident #1 when the facility dropped Resident #1 off at his RP1's home on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2023-11-29 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to obtain timely laboratory services to meet the needs of 1 of 4 residents reviewed for laboratory services. (Resident #3) The facility failed to obtain laboratory values as ordered on [DATE]. Resident #3's laboratory blood draw specimen became useless after an extended time and was not redrawn. Resident #3 was hospitalized on [DATE] with diagnoses including sepsis. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on [DATE] at 5:10 p.m. While the IJ was removed on [DATE] at 1:45 p.m., the facility remained out of compliance at actual harm with a scope identified as isolated, due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. This failure could place residents at risk for a delay in identifying or diagnosing medical issues. Findings Include: Review of Resident #3's undated face sheet reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female with diagnoses including Alzheimer's, dementia, congestive heart failure and type II diabetes.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-06-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remained as free of accidents and hazards as was possible and that each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents hazards and supervision. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #1's bed was in low position, and his alternating air mattress was with the correct settings when Resident #1 experienced an unwitnessed fall on 06/05/2026 at 07:34 PM. This failure could place residents at risk for falls with the possibility of injury, including fractures.Findings included: Review of Resident #1's admission record, dated 06/09/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and most recently readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included: pressure ulcer of sacral region (an pressure sore to the area just above the buttocks on the lower back), osteomyelitis (an infection in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to immediately inform the resident; consult with the resident's physician; and notify, consistent with his or her authority, the resident representative(s) when there is a significant change in the resident's physical status for one (Resident #1) of seven residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure ADON A notified the resident's responsible party/medical power of attorney within a reasonable time when Resident #1 fell out of bed on 06/12/2026. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their responsible party/medical power of attorney notified of changes, which could result in a delay in timely intervention and a decline in condition. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet dated 06/23/2026 reflected a [AGE] year-old female with an admission date of 06/04/2026. Her diagnoses included unspecified fracture of right femur (break in thigh bone), anemia in chronic kidney disease (kidneys are damaged…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for catheter care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's urinary drainage bag was found hanging from the bed frame with the bottom of the bag touching the floor/floor mat on two occasions on 06/09/2026. This failure could place residents with indwelling catheters (a tube that is inserted through the urethra to the bladder to drain urine) at risk of developing infections.Findings included: Review of Resident #1's admission record, dated 06/09/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and most recently readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included: pressure ulcer of sacral region (an pressure sore to the area just above the buttocks on the lower back), osteomyelitis (an infection in the bone), and end stage renal disease (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents could exercise their rights without interference for 1 of 10 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to prevent staff from obscuring the view of an authorized electronic monitoring device in Resident #1's bedroom on 05/28/2026. This failure placed residents at risk of abuse, neglect, or maltreatment not being identified.Findings included: Review of the undated face sheet for Resident #1 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included traumatic brain injury, schizophrenia, seizure disorder, and major depressive disorder. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment for Resident #1 dated 05/01/2026 reflected he could not participate in the BIMS assessment due to cognitive impairment. Review of the care plan for Resident #1 dated 09/15/2025 reflected the following: FOCUSResident/Resident's responsible party has requested electronic monitoring.GOALResident/Responsible…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to properly store, prepare, and distribute food in accordance with professional standards for 1 of 1 kitchen observed for food service safety.1. The facility failed to properly store, label and date all food items located in the walk-in refrigerator on 04/08/2026 and 04/10/2026.2. The facility failed to ensure the dry food pantry was clean and free of accumulated black residue on the wall and shelves.These failures could have placed residents at risk for food contamination and foodborne illness.Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to properly store, prepare, and distribute food in accordance with professional standards for 1 of 1 kitchen observed for food service safety.1. The facility failed to properly store, label and date all food items located in the walk-in refrigerator on 04/08/2026 and 04/10/2026.2. The facility failed to ensure the dry food pantry was clean and free of accumulated black residue on the wall and shelves.These failures could have placed residents at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 of 7 residents (Resident #26, Resident #37, and Resident #76) reviewed for infection control. RN Treatment Nurse C did not change contaminated gloves prior to Resident #26's repositioning; contact with clean supplies; and she did not wash her hands after removing gloves post perineal care. RN B did not sanitize her hands between changing gloves while performing indwelling catheter care on Resident #37. ADON LVN F did not sanitize the over-the-bed table prior to setting supplies on it and turned her back to a sterile field multiple times while performing tracheostomy care on Resident #76. These failures could place the residents at risk of infection transmission, sepsis, and hospitalization. Findings included: A. Record review of Resident #26's face sheet, dated 04/10/2026, reflected [AGE] year-old male…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1 (Resident #26) of 7 residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to encourage and assist Resident #26 with dressing in his preferred personal clothing which was available on-site rather than hospital type gowns during the day. This failure could place residents at risk for diminished quality of life, loss of dignity, and a decrease sense of self-worth. The findings include: Record review of Resident #26's face sheet, dated 04/10/2026, reflected [AGE] year-old male originally admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: unspecified convulsions (sudden, involuntary, and often violent contractions of muscles, characterized by shaking, rigidity, and potential loss of consciousness), major depressive disorder severe with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 1 of 15 residents (Resident #10) reviewed for resident rights.The facility failed to ensure Resident #10's bathroom was free from dirt on the floor.This failure could place residents at risk of infection and diminished quality of life.Findings include:Record review of Resident #10's admission record, dated 04/10/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and most recently readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included urinary tract infection, depression (a mood disorder with persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and chronic kidney disease (the gradual loss of kidney function).Record review of Resident #10's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE] reflected a BIMS score of 13, which indicated no cognitive impairment.During an interview and observation on 04/08/2026 at 1:55 PM, Resident #10 stated it made her upset that the facility did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments for 2 ( Resident #22 and Resident #52) out of 8 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to update the comprehensive care plan to reflect Resident #22 and Resident #52 received in room activity programs. This failure could have placed residents at risk for not having their needs identified and met. Findings include: Record review of Resident #22's face sheet, dated 04/09/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old-male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety ( a medical diagnosis indicating that a person has a clear memory loss and the specific cause and severity have not been determined and does not have any behaviors…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for two of eight residents (Resident # 22 and Resident #52) reviewed for ADL care.The facility failed to ensure Resident #22 and Resident #52's nails were cleaned and did not have any on 04/08/2026 and 04/09/2026. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving services or care, diminished quality of life , and decreased self-esteem.Findings included: Record review of Resident #22's face sheet, dated 04/09/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old-male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety ( a medical diagnosis indicating that a person has a clear memory loss and the specific cause and severity have not been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing activity program to support residents in their choice of activities, both facility sponsored group and individual activities, and independent activities, designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, encouraging both independence and interaction in the community for 2 (Residents #22, and #52 of 6 residents reviewed for activities. The facility failed to provide activities for Resident #22 and Resident #52 to meet their psycho-social and mental needs for the months of January, February , March and April 2026.This failure could place residents at risks of boredom, depression, behavior, diminished quality of life and decreased cognitive function. Findings include:Record review of Resident #22's face sheet, dated 04/09/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old-male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 37 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as is possible for one of three housekeeping carts (Housekeeping Cart #1) reviewed for hazards.The facility failed to ensure Housekeeping Cart #1, with chemicals inside the compartments, was locked when unsupervised. This failure could place residents at risk for injuries, illness, and hospitalization.Findings included:Observation on 04/08/2026 at 9:15 am revealed Housekeeping Cart #1 was located near 100 hall. The compartment where chemicals were stored was not locked. The compartment had glass cleaner, disinfectant cleaner, tub and tile cleaner, and bio waste degrader. Housekeeper G was not standing near the housekeeping cart, and no other staff was near the unlocked housekeeping cart. Housekeeper G was at the end of 100 hall. There were not any residents near the unlocked housekeeping cart.During an interview on 04/08/2026 at 9:25 a.m., Housekeeper G stated the housekeeping cart was expected to be locked anytime housekeeper walked away…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who is incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for 1 ( Resident #16) of three residents reviewed for catheter care. The facility failed to have the appropriate size foley catheter ( a medical device used to drain urine from the bladder) in the facility when Resident #16 was complaining of pain from his catheter on 04/08/2026.This failure could place residents at risk for infection, sepsis( a serious condition in which the body responds improperly to an infection, causing organ damage) and hospitalization.Findings included:Review of Resident #16's face sheet, dated 04/09/2026, reflected Resident #16 was a [AGE] year-old-male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications ( a diagnosis of diabetes where high blood sugar exists but had not caused chronic damage to organ systems), benign…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding for one (Resident #33) of two residents reviewed for enteral feeding (a tube is inserted directly through the abdomen to the stomach to provide nourishment). The facility failed to ensure RN D attended to a flow error alarm on a feeding pump for 45 minutes for Resident #33 on 04/08/2026. This failure could place residents at risk of malnutrition, pain, and/or significant changes in condition. Findings included: Record review of Resident #33's admission record, dated 04/08/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and most recently readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dysphagia following cerebral infarction (difficulty swallowing after blood flow to the brain was blocked causing damage to the brain), Gastrostomy status (a tube is inserted directly through the abdomen to the stomach to provide nourishment and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with State and Federal laws, all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 1 of 4 medication carts ( Medication Cart #1) reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to ensure Medication Cart #1 was locked and medications were secure and not accessible to other staff, residents or visitors.This failure could place residents at risk of having unauthorized access to prescriptions, biologicals, and over-the-counter medications.Findings include:Observation on 04/09/2026 at 1:03 pm revealed medication cart #1 was unlocked against the wall by the common tv area. The back of the cart was against a half wall with the top open to the tv common area. The drawers of the medication cart were facing the area near the nurse's desk. The locking mechanism was protruding outward on the medication cart. The State Surveyor opened the drawers and captured photos. The med aide…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and reviews, the facility failed to provide food that was prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs and by methods that conserve nutritive value and flavor for 4 residents who ate pureed diets from 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food and nutrition services.The facility failed to ensure that the lunch meal on 04/09/2026 was served at the correct temperature and was palatable. The facility failed to ensure [NAME] A refrained from adding an unmeasured amount of liquid to fish sticks, pureed meal during lunch service on 4/10/2026. This failure could affect residents at risk for diminished or altered nutritional status and potential weight loss.Email received from the Administrator on 04/09/2026 at 8:23 revealed 4 residents at the facility received a pureed diet. Observation and interview conducted on 04/10/2026 at 10:43 AM revealed [NAME] A placed an unmeasured amount of broth into the puree blender with the fish sticks. She did not measure the broth. [NAME] A proceeded to puree the fish sticks. She stated there were 4 residents on puree diets.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that are completely and accurately documented for 1 (Resident #26) of 7 residents reviewed for medical records. The facility failed to maintain complete and accurate documentation of provided incontinent care for Resident #26. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for not receiving proper care due to incomplete and inaccurate records.The findings include: During an attempted interview with Resident #26 on 4/09/2026 at 2:15 p pm. to verify if he was changed or needed to be changed, he was unable to give comprehensive answer regarding his incontinent status. Record review of Resident #26's face sheet, dated 04/10/2026, reflected [AGE] year-old male originally admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: unspecified convulsions (sudden, involuntary, and often violent contractions of muscles, characterized by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 4 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for measurable objectives and timeframes. The facility failed to enter dates into the Care Plan when Resident #1 sustained bruises, and no goal or interventions for the resident's diagnosis of schizophrenia (a mental health disorder). This failure could result in inadequate care due to incomplete and inaccurate care plans. The findings include: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 12/15/25, reflected a -[AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-readmitted [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included: TBI (traumatic brain injury), ID (intellectual disability,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents observed for pharmacy services.The facility failed to assure Resident #1 was aware of the medications that he was administering.This failure could affect residents receiving medications by placing them at risk for medication errors. Findings included:Review of Resident #1's MDS assessment, dated 12/4/2025, reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included unspecified convulsions (A seizure occurs due to an electrical disturbance in the brain, while a convulsion describes the involuntary action of jerking and contraction), schizophrenia, unspecified (a serious mental health condition that affects how people think, feel and behave), weakness (the state…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-10 · tag F0551 — isolated
    Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the legal surrogate so designated may exercise the resident's rights to the extent provided by state law for 1 of 7 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure that LVN F did not care for Resident #1 on 10/08/2025 and 10/09/2025 after the RP told him to leave the room and not care for Resident #1 after 10/08/2025 at 7:32AM. This failure couple place residents whose rights are exercised through a legal representative at risk of not having their rights exercised.Findings Include: Record Review of Resident #1's Facesheet printed on 10/08/2025 revealed a 37 y/o male, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included unspecified convulsions, schizophrenia, weakness, and personal history of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Record review of Resident #1's admission MDS, dated [DATE], reflected no BIMS score. Section GG -Functional Abilities - admission section reflected Resident #1 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature controls, and permit only authorized personnel to have access, for 1 Resident (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for medication storage, in that: A bottle of Nystatin Topical Powder was found on 04/24/25 at 12:55 pm left unattended and unsecured at Resident #1's bedside. This deficient practice placed residents at risk for unauthorized access, drug diversion, or ingestion of medications leading to harm. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 0414/25 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. She had diagnoses of diabetes mellitus Type 2 (a chronic condition where the body either doesn't produce enough insulin, or the cells don't properly respond to the insulin produced, leading to elevated blood sugar levels), mild cognitive impairment, disorder of pituitary gland, and obesity. Review of Resident #1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-02-12 · tag F0572 — widespread
    Give residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, observations, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide a notice of residents' rights to the residents during the residents' stay for three out of four halls. Information of residents' rights was posted only on Hallway 4 and not accessible for viewing by all facility residents. Resident rights were not included in residents' admission packets since November 2023. These failures placed residents at risk of a decreased quality of life, decreased awareness or their rights, and decreased execution of their resident rights. The findings were: Record review of facility's admission packet dated 10/19/22 reflected Health Care Center Policies, Information, and Required Notices: Acknowledgement of Receipt of Policies, Information, & Required Notices - Statement of Resident Rights Notice of rights and services (19.403)(B)(6). The Health Care Center must inform the resident, the resident's next of kin or guardian, both orally and in writing, a language that the resident understands. Of his rights and all rules and regulations governing resident conduct and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one of one kitchen reviewed for sanitation. 1. The facility failed to properly label food and dispose of store perishable foods in the dry storage pantry and walk in fridge. 2. The facility failed to ensure the ice machine was properly cleaned. These failures could place residents who were served from the kitchen at risk for consuming hazardous expired food and developing foodborne illnesses. Findings Included: Observation on 02/10/25 at 9:30 am revealed a 50-pound bag of yellow onions sitting in water on the floor in the dry storage room. Observation on 02/10/25 at 9:38 am revealed cold eggs sitting on the stove top in a pan with a spatula in the pan. Observation on 02/10/25 at 9:39 am revealed a pitcher of tea and a pan of cake sitting in the food warmer. The warmer was in the off position. Observation on 02/10/25 at 10:32 am revealed the inside of the ice machine had an unknown black slime by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment, and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections, for two of two medication aides (MA A and MA B) observed for infection control practices during medication pass. A) MA A failed to sanitize the blood pressure cuff during medication pass after using it on Resident #46 then using it on Resident #45. B) MA B failed to sanitize the blood pressure cuff during medication pass after using it on Resident #133 then using it on Resident #28. This failure could place residents who require assistance with medication administration at risk for healthcare associated cross-contamination and infections. Findings included: A) Review of Resident #46's face sheet dated 02/11/2025 reflected she was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses anemia (Deficiency of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-12 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain all mechanical and electrical equipment in safe operating condition in 1 of 1 kitchen, in that: The coffee brewing system was not heating. The left side of the double oven was not heating. One well on the steam table was not heating The mobile heated delivery cart was not maintaining a proper temperature. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of decreased resident's quality of life who receive meals from the kitchen and could result in foodborne illness for residents who received meals from the kitchen. Findings included: Observation in the kitchen on 02/10/2025 at 9:15 am revealed the heated delivery cart on with the temperature reading 75 degrees . Observation in the kitchen on 02/10/2025 at 9:15 am revealed the coffee pot had an error message stating, heating element malfunction. Observation in the kitchen on 02/10/2025 at 11:30 am revealed the left well of the steam table was not working. Observation in the kitchen on 02/10/2025 at 11:30 am revealed the left side compartment of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-12 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolated
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service in 1(DA B) of- 8 1 kitchen staff in that: DA B had not received training from facility management staff, mandatory online training, or obtained a food handlers certificate before working in the kitchen. This could leave the resident's at risk of consuming improperly handled food and a contracting a foodborne illness Findings included: Record Review on 02/12/25 at 2:30 PM of DA B's employee file revealed her application and background check, but nothing else. In an interview with DA B on 02/10/25 at 9:30 am, she stated that she had not been trained on how to use the dishwasher,. She stated she was not sure what temperature was appropriate for the dishwasher and what level the disinfectant was supposed to be at. In an interview with DA A on 02/10/25 at 9:35 am, she stated that DA B was hired on 02/04/25 and that she was trying to help her out, but was not able to teach her everything. She…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one of one kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. The facility failed to ensure [NAME] C properly used proper hand hygiene during food preparation. This failure could place residents who ate food from the kitchen at risk for foodborne illness. Findings included: Observation on 01/16/2025 between 10:45 AM and 11:15 AM, [NAME] C was preparing residents' lunch meal. She was not wearing gloves when she was stirring food in pots on the stove. [NAME] C exited from the stove area and pushed a utility kitchen cart from the stove area located in front of the kitchen to the area back of the kitchen. [NAME] C touched her clothes and adjusted her hair net prior to picking up gloves from the container. [NAME] C did not wash or sanitize her hands prior to picking up the fourchettes ( a component of the glove where the fingers fit into the glove) on the gloves with her fingers on both hands. [NAME] C proceeded to put her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 1 (Resident #1) of 4 residents reviewed for environment. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's room was free of odor and soiled sheets. This failure placed residents at risk of living in an uncomfortable environment leading to a diminished quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated, 01/17/2025, reflected an [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included Parkinson's disease without dyskinesia, without mention of fluctuations (a progressive movement disorder of the nervous system. Dyskinesia (involuntary, erratic, writhing movements of the face, arms, legs, or trunk)), unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety (a decline in mental ability…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review , the facility did not ensure prompt efforts were made to document a resident grievance for one (Resident #2) of four residents reviewed for grievance resolutions. The facility failed to promptly document grievances regarding answering call lights and begin an investigation. This failure placed resident at risk of not having their grievances resolved. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated, 01/17/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #2 had diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified (a long- term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe), polyneuropathy, unspecified (a condition that occurs when nerves are damaged, causing problems with sensation, coordination, and other body functions), and morbid obesity with alveolar hypoventilation ( a severe form of obesity that can be life-threatening. Record review of Resident #2's admission MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain functional abilities for 1 (Resident #3) out of 7 residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3 was placed in a safe and comfortable position while eating. This failure placed the resident at risk of discomfort and choking/aspiration. Findings included: Review of Resident #3's face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of unspecified fracture of left femur, multiple sclerosis (a disease which causes nerve damage and disrupts communication between the brain and the body), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and cognitive communication deficit (communication impairment causing trouble reasoning and making decisions while communicating). Review of Resident #3's comprehensive MDS, dated [DATE], reflected a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one (Resident #3) out of five residents reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure staff wore PPE while providing care for Resident #3. 2. The facility failed to ensure staff followed the facility policy and tied back long hair to minimize cross contamination. These failures placed the residents at risk of cross contamination and infection. Findings included: Review of Resident #3's face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of unspecified fracture of left femur, multiple sclerosis (a disease which causes nerve damage and disrupts communication between the brain and the body), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and cognitive communication deficit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received services in the facility with reasonable accommodations of each resident's needs for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for resident rights in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's call light was within reach on 08/14/24. This failure could affect residents who needed assistance with activities of daily living and could result in needs not being met. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission record dated 08/14/24 documented a 63year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included: cerebral infarction (disrupted blood flow to the brain due to problems with the blood vessels that supply it) essential primary hypertension (abnormally high blood pressure that not caused by a medical condition), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and general anxiety disorder (mental health condition that causes people to feel constant, excessive, and unrealistic worry about…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to review and revise care plans for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for care plan revision. The facility failed to complete a quarterly review and revision of Resident #1's care plan by 03/29/24. Resident #1's last care plan was reviewed, revised, and completed on 12/29/23. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their individual care needs met in a timely manner or a diminished quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission record, dated 04/25/24, revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE], had an RP, and diagnoses including unspecified dementia (A group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning), unspecified recurrent major depressive disorder, unspecified mood [affective] disorder, cognitive communication deficit, unspecified chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (A group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food under sanitary conditions in the facility's only kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. The facility failed to discard of food products that were past the use by date or in accordance with facility policy. The facility failed to properly label left over food held in the walk-in refrigerator. The facility failed to ensure that their three-door refrigerator was operating at a temperature of 41 degrees Fahrenheit or less and that temperatures were properly logged. The facility failed to remove dented cans from the dry storage area to prevent service to residents. The facility failed to clean the industrial can opener. The facility failed to clean up a liquid spill in the kitchen. These failures could place the residents at risk of cross contamination, loss of nutritional value, weight loss, and foodborne illness. Findings included: Observation on 01/07/2024 at 9:09 AM revealed that the facility's three door refrigerator's exterior thermometer displayed 48 degrees…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-09 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to enter baseline care plans for three of three Residents (Resident #136, Resident #138 and Resident #141) admitted within the last month and reviewed for new admissions to the facility. The facility failed to follow its policy which reflected residents must have a baseline care plan on admission and it must be presented to the resident. This failure put residents at risk for not being provided assistance as needed. Findings include: Resident #136 Review of the Face Sheet for Resident #136 reflected he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Sepsis, Acute Respiratory Failure, Fluid overload, Malignant Melanoma of skin, bacterial pneumonia, Depression, Atrial Fib, Cerebrospinal disease, COPD, Cellulitis of left lower limb, Pressure Ulcer of Sacrum. Review of MDS assessments for Resident #136 reflected no assessments had yet been completed. Review of Resident #136's assessment records reflected no baseline or other care plans were present for the resident,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 3 of 22 residents (Resident #8, Resident #33, Resident #57 ) reviewed for ADL's. A) The facility failed to ensure assistance was provided for showering/bathing and personal hygiene for Resident #8. B) The facility failed to provide nail care for Resident #33. C) The facility failed to provide nail care for Resident #57. These failures could lead to a reduction in quality of life by creating isolating behaviors due to embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, and dignity and could contribute to health-related issues from lack of hygiene. Findings Included: A) Review of Resident #8's Face Sheet dated 01/08/2024 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses Autistic Disorder (A condition related to brain development that impacts how a person perceives and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-09 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure two of four residents reviewed with limited range of motion (Resident #33 and Resident #51), received appropriate treatment and services to prevent a decline in range of motion. A) The facility failed to ensure Resident #33 had interventions in place for her hand contractures to prevent further decline of her hand, associated pain and pressure areas. B) The facility failed to ensure Resident #51 had interventions in place for her left-hand contracture (A permanent tightening of the muscles, tendons, skin, and surrounding tissues that causes the joints to shorten and stiffen and a decrease in ROM) and left knee contracture to prevent further decline of the range of motion in her left hand and left knee. This deficient practice placed residents with contractures at risk for decrease in mobility, range of motion, and contribute to worsening of contractures. Findings Include: A) Review of Resident #33's Face Sheet reflected a [AGE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and record review, the facility failed to accommodate the needs and preferences for two of twenty residents (Residents #33 and #74) reviewed for accommodation of needs, in that: The facility failed to ensure that Residents #33 and #74 had their call lights in reach. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for not receiving timely care and nursing interventions. Findings included: Resident #33 Review of Resident #33's Face Sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnosis cerebral palsy, severe intellectual, paralytic syndrome (loss of weakness or movement). Review of Resident #33's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #33 was assessed to have a BIMS score of five (5) indicating severe cognitive impairment. Resident #33 required extensive assist with all ADLs. Further review reflected Resident #33 had impairment in range of motion (ROM) to the upper (shoulder, elbow, wrist, hand) and lower extremity (hip,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-09 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to recognize the residents right to formulate an advance directive for one of three residents (Resident #138) reviewed for DNR status. The facility failed to enter a life code status for Residents #138 in his chart until pointed out by the surveyor on second day of survey. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their end of life wishes met. Findings include: Review of the Face Sheet for Resident #138 reflected he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Fluid Overload and Pyuria. On 1/09/24 an admission MDS assessment had not been completed for Resident #138. Review of the Care Plan for Resident #138 dated 1/06/24 reflected interventions were in place for: risk of pressure ulcer development, fall risk, Foley Catheter, Diuretic therapy, ADL deficits, and Fluid Overload. A DNR intervention was added to the Care Plan on 1/08/24 after surveyor intervention. Review of Resident #138's out of hospital Do Not Resuscitate Order (DNR) dated 1/05/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #74) reviewed for physical environment, in that: The facility failed to maintain a clean commode free from feces. These failures could affect resident by placing him at risk for diminished quality of life due to the lack of a well-kept environment, infection, and illness. Findings included: Review of Resident #74's face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] readmission date 11/21/2023 with the following diagnosis acute cerebrovascular, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral 11/21/2023 secondary disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. Review of Resident #74's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] reflected Resident #74 was assessed to have a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three (3) indicating…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received care, consistent with professional standards of care to prevent development or worsening of diabetic ulcers for one of five (Resident #1) residents reviewed for diabetic ulcers. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received her physician ordered diabetic ulcer preventative measures routinely. This failure could place residents at risk for worsening pressure ulcers leading to discomfort, pain, and potential infections. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's Face sheet dated 01/08/2024 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 4 (It is the last stage before kidney failure. It is likely someone with stage 4 will need dialysis or a kidney transplant in the near future.), Myocardial Infarction (Damage to the heart muscle caused by a loss of blood supply due to blocks in the arteries.), and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received care, consistent with professional standards of care to prevent development or worsening of pressure ulcers for one of one (Resident #32) reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility failed to ensure Resident #32 received her physician ordered pressure ulcer preventative measures routinely. This failure could place residents at risk for worsening pressure ulcers leading to discomfort, pain, and potential infections. Findings included: Review of Resident #32's Face Sheet dated 01/09/2024 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety, type 2 diabetes and morbid (severe) obesity. Record review of Resident #32's comprehensive MDS dated [DATE] reflected Resident #32's functional status required extensive assistance of two-person physical assist for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remains free of accident hazards as possible. The facility failed to ensure a needle was disposed of safely when a blood draw needle was found in a Resident #48's room with blood in tubing. This failure put residents in danger of accidental injury and exposure to blood borne illness. Findings include: Observation on 1/07/24 at 9:07 am of Resident #48's room revealed a used needle (butterfly type) with blood visible in tubing was on the extra bed in the room. In an interview at the time Resident #48 stated she had a lab test some days earlier but she stated she rarely touched the extra bed. Review of the Face Sheet for Resident #48 reflected she was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnoses of: Hypo-osmolality and Hyponatremia, Restless legs syndrome, Anxiety disorder, Bipolar disorder, Chronic pain syndrome and congenital spinal deformity. Review of the MDS assessment for Resident #48 dated 12/15/23 reflected a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who are incontinent of bladder receive appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for two of four residents reviewed for catheters (Resident #22, and Resident #138). A) The facility failed to ensure Resident #22's received care to prevent urinary tract infections when they stored his catheter bag on the floor. B) The facility failed to ensure Resident #138 received care to prevent urinary tract infections when they stored his catheter bag on the floor. These failures could place residents with foley catheters at risk for urinary tract infections and change of condition. Findings included: A) Review of Resident #22's Face sheet dated 01/08/2024 reflected a [AGE] year old male admitted on [DATE] with the following diagnosies Dementia (A group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life.), Chronic Diastolic (Congestive) Heart failure (A condition where the heart can't…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory care was provided consistent with professional standards of practice for 2 of 6 Residents (Resident #22 and #59) reviewed for respiratory care. A) The facility failed to ensure Resident 22's oxygen tubing was changed weekly and his oxygen concentrator filter was clean and in place. B)The facility failed to ensure Resident #59's oxygen tubing and nasal canula were dated and changed. The facility further failed to ensure Resident #59 was comfortable by receiving humidified air to prevent dried nasal passages. This failure could place residents who use respiratory equipment at risk for respiratory infections. Findings included: A) Review of Resident #22's Face sheet dated 01/08/2024 reflected a [AGE] year old male admitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses Dementia (A group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life.), Chronic Diastolic (Congestive) Heart failure (A condition where the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews the facility failure to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles. The facility failed to ensure safe medication administration when an observation during medication pass on [DATE] revealed five loose pills were found within the medication cart's drawers and greatly increased the chances for accident administration to the wrong resident. This failure put residents at risk for accidental ingestion of medication that was not prescribed to them and subsequent side effects. Findings include: Observation of the Medication Cart for hall 100 on [DATE] at 11:00 AM revealed medication was loose in the cart with Med Aide M. Observation revealed OTC meds were not marked for opening dates. Med Aide Sterling stated the facility policy indicated they no longer had to mark opening dates on OTC medications. Observation revealed 5 loose pills were found in the medication drawer, one clear oblong, two white oblong, one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-09 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of one of one (Resident #31) resident reviewed with needs and preferences to assist the resident in maintaining and/or achieving independent functioning, dignity, and well-being to the extent possible in accordance with the resident's own needs and preferences. The staff did not accommodate Resident #31's dietary preferences. This failure could affect residents who have told the facility their food preferences and rely on the facility to not serve them food that they have told them they dislike to the detriment to their dignity and quality of life . Findings include: Review of Resident #31's Face Sheet dated 01/07/2023 reflected an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of major depressive disorder, cognitive communication, mood [affective] disorder, vascular dementia, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction 04/09/2022 secondary affecting left dominant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-09 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe functional environment for room [ROOM NUMBER], 200 hall, Resident #22, staff, and the public. A large crack in the floor was observed from the outside wall in room [ROOM NUMBER](Resident #22's room) which extended all the way through the room and across 200 hallway. Ants were noted building a mound from the crack under Resident #22's bed. This failure could place residents at risk for an unsafe environment. Findings included: Review of Resident #22's Face sheet dated 01/08/2024 reflected a [AGE] year old male admitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses Dementia (A group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life.), Chronic Diastolic (Congestive) Heart failure (A condition where the heart can't fill up with blood properly due to stiffening of the left ventricle.) and retention of urine (A condition where your bladder doesn't empty all the way or at all when you urinate.). Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$31,460 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $8,405 — penalty dated 2025-10-10
  • $23,055 — penalty dated 2024-04-26

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CREATIVE SOLUTIONS IN HEALTHCARE — 149 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.1-0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 1 of 53.2-2.2 vs chain
The other 148 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)
1 of 5Afton Oaks Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterHouston, TX 1 of 5Arlington Heights Health and Rehabilitation CenterFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Beltline Healthcare CenterGarland, TX 1 of 5Bluebonnet Nursing & RehabilitationKarnes City, TX 1 of 5Bluebonnet Point WellnessBullard, TX 1 of 5Brentwood Terrace Healthcare And RehabilitationParis, TX 1 of 5Buena Vida Nursing and Rehab-San AntonioSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Cottonwood Nursing & RehabilitationDenton, TX 1 of 5Countryview Nursing & RehabilitationTerrell, TX 1 of 5Dogwood Trails ManorWoodville, TX 1 of 5Downtown Health and Rehabilitation CenterFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Estates Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Fair Park Health & Rehabilitation CenterDallas, TX 1 of 5Five Points Nursing & Rehabilitation of College StCollege Station, TX 1 of 5Five Points at Lake Highlands Nursing and RehabDallas, TX 1 of 5Five Points of PflugervillePflugerville, TX 1 of 5Franklin Heights Nursing & RehabilitationEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Gilmer Nursing & RehabilitationGilmer, TX 1 of 5Grace Pointe Wellness CenterEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Graham Oaks Care CenterGraham, TX 1 of 5Granbury Care CenterGranbury, TX 1 of 5Greenhill VillasMount Pleasant, TX 1 of 5Heritage At Longview Healthcare CenterLongview, TX 1 of 5Huebner Creek Health & Rehabilitation CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Interlochen Health and Rehabilitation CenterArlington, TX 1 of 5Kenedy Health & RehabilitationKenedy, TX 1 of 5Kennedy Health & RehabLufkin, TX 1 of 5Lake Lodge Nursing & RehabilitationLake Worth, TX 1 of 5Lancaster Nursing & RehabilitationLancaster, TX 1 of 5Marine Creek Nursing & RehabilitationFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Mesa Vista Inn Health CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Mountain View Health & RehabilitationEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Navasota Nursing & RehabilitationNavasota, TX 1 of 5Normandy Terrace Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5North Pointe Nursing and RehabilitationWatauga, TX 1 of 5Park Place Care CenterGeorgetown, TX 1 of 5Parkview Manor Nursing and RehabilitationWeimar, TX 1 of 5Peach Tree PlaceWeatherford, TX 1 of 5Pebble Creek Nursing CenterEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Pecan Tree Rehab And Healthcare CenterGainesville, TX

Showing 40 of 148; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
HUGGINS, LINDAIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 12/01/2019
CREATIVE SOLUTIONS IN HEALTHCARE INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/01/2019
BLAKE, GARYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/01/2019
BLAKE, MALISAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/01/2019

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+13.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 69%Medicare 8%Other / private 23%

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$193per resident / day
operating cost
$5,879per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$225per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 676019. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next