No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Granbury Care Center

301 South Park Street, Granbury, TX 76048 · Government - Hospital district · 174 certified beds · (817) 573-3726 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0605) — cited Feb 20261 immediate-jeopardy citation1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$37,501 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $37,501 in federal fines (most recent 2025-09-12)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (94%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1308 Paluxy Rd · (817) 579-3924 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
314 S Morgan St · (817) 573-5539 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1509 W Pearl St · (817) 475-7886 · Call to confirm hours
Park
City Park0.3 mi
301 N Park Dr · (817) 573-7275 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased13.8%15.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.3%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.9%0.8%2.0%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.6%2.4%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.6%3.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.0%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication25.1%18.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.7%3.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control19.8%13.4%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.1%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication4.1%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.2%88.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.9%25.7%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit18.9%12.3%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.152.171.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.812.061.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 83 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

49.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
73.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.29U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.16hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 73.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 41 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 46% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF49.8%CMS range 40.3–58.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.8%CMS range 7.6–15.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge73.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge82.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge73.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened6.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.7%CMS range 4.5–12.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.861.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.28
RN hours/ resident / day
0.79
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.63
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.71
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.24
RN hoursweekends
94.2%
Total nursing turnover
75.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 174 beds and averages 134.2 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 40 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.71 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.28 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.63 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.36 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.85 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.30 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 94% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-19)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-04)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

37 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-09-12 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident received CPR in accordance with professional standards of practice for one (Resident #1) of six resident's reviewed for CPR. On [DATE] at 12:20 am, LVN A failed to initiate CPR on Resident #1 who was a full code status. Resident #1 expired on [DATE]. An Immediate Jeopardy was identified on [DATE] at 5:00 pm. The noncompliance began on [DATE] and ended on [DATE]. It was determined to be past non-compliance due to the facility having implemented action that corrected the non-compliance prior to the beginning of the investigation. This failure could affect residents who are full code status and could need CPR by placing them at risk of death. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated [DATE] revealed an [AGE] year-old female, with an original admission date of [DATE] and the latest readmission date of [DATE]. The resident expired on [DATE]. The resident had a primary diagnoses of unspecified dementia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-02-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of 10 residents reviewed for multiple falls. The facility failed to implement a system for identifying fall patterns and implementing interventions to prevent falls that lead to emergency room visits with serious injury on 12/17/2023 and 02/07/2024 for Resident #1 and 12/10/2023 and 01/04/2024 for Resident #2. An IJ was identified on 02/16/2024. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 10:25 am. While the IJ was removed on 02/16/2024, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of pattern and a severity level of potential for more than minimal harm, due to the facility's need to continue to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their corrective systems. These failures could place the residents at risk for falls, serious injuries, hospitalizations, and death. Findings…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-30 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive assessment within 14 days after admission to the facility, for 1 of 7 (Resident #6) residents reviewed for comprehensive assessments.The facility failed to complete Resident #5's comprehensive admission MDS assessment within 14 days after admission.This failure could place residents at risk of not having their care and treatment needs assessed to ensure necessary care and services were provided.Findings included:Record review of Resident #5's electronic face sheet dated 03/30/3036, reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including non-pressure chronic ulcer of left heel (left heel chronic wound that was not a pressure ulcer), DM type 2 (a chronic condition characterized by high blood sugar levels due to the body's inability to use insulin effectively), hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol), insomnia (inability to fall or stay asleep during the night), cellulitis of left lower limb (left lower leg skin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-19 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free of any significant medication error reviewed 5 of 5 (LVN E, LVN I, LVN J, LVN K and ADON A) staff reviewed for Insulin use. The facility failed to ensure LVN E held Resident #102's Lantus 100 Units/ML two (2) times when his blood glucose was under 120 for a two (2)-month review period. The facility failed to ensure LVN I held Resident #102's Lantus 100 Units/ML thirteen (13) times when his blood glucose was under 120 for a two (2)-month review period. The facility failed to ensure LVN J held Resident #102's Lantus 100 Units/ML three (3) times when his blood glucose was under 120 for a two (2)-month review period. The facility failed to ensure LVN K held Resident #102's Lantus 100 Units/ML six (6) times when his blood glucose was under 120 for a two (2)-month review period. The facility failed to ensure ADON A held Resident #102's Lantus 100 Units/ML six (1) times when his blood glucose was under 120 for a two (2)-month review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed food safety. The facility failed to ensure foods were properly labeled in the kitchen. This failure could place residents at risk for food borne illnesses.Findings include: During an observation on 02/16/2026 between 9:02 AM and 9:24 AM, of the kitchen revealed: 2 boxes of bananas in the walk-in refrigerator appeared brown and/or bruised. The box was not labeled with the received date or use by date.1 - 106 oz can labeled Frutas Tropicals was dented along the top rim1 - 112 oz can labeled Banana Pudding was dented along the top rim1 - 116 oz can labeled Blueberry Topping was dented along the top rim1 - 7 lb 8 oz bottle labeled Chocolate Syrup was opened and not labeled with a received date or use by date1 - 15.8 oz bottle labeled Chocolate Syrup was not labeled with a received date or expiration date1 - 5 lb bag labeled white cake mix was not labeled with a received date or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed ensure, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, medical records were maintained on each resident that were complete and accurately documented for 1 of 26 residents (Resident #6) reviewed for accurate records.1. The facility failed to have documentation to indicate why Resident #6's long-acting insulin (insulin glargine) was held when chart codes indicated see nurse notes.2. The facility failed to have parameter for Resident #6's long-acting insulin (insulin glargine) documented in physician orders.These failures could place residents of an accurate depiction of care in the facility.Findings include:Record review of Resident #6's electronic physician orders, dated 09/24/2025, reflected Basaglar KwikPen Subcutaneous Solution Pen - Injector 100 unit/ml (insulin glargine) Inject 14 unit subcutaneously two times a day related to type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications. There was no evidence MD-M had parameters to hold insulin if…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-19 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — pattern
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure regular inspections were conducted of all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails, as part of a regular maintenance program to identify areas of possible entrapment for 3 of 4 residents (Resident #7, Resident #22 and Resident #48) reviewed for physical environment.The facility failed to conduct regular inspections of resident side rails, bed frames and mattresses to identify entrapment risks for Resident #7, Resident #22, and Resident #48.This failure could place residents at risk of injury, equipment malfunction, entrapment, or falls.Findings include: Record review of Resident #7's electronic face sheet, dated 02/19/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #7 had diagnoses which included paraplegia (the impairment or total loss of motor and sensory function in the lower half of the body, usually affecting the legs, feet, and sometimes the torso), history of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to be informed of, and participate in, his or her treatment including the right to be informed in advance, by the physician or other practitioner or professional, of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives or treatment options and to choose the alternative or option he/ she preferred for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #8) reviewed for antipsychotic consents.The facility failed to ensure Resident #8 or their representative signed consent for antipsychotic medication aripiprazole (an antipsychotic medication used to treat mental health disorders, such as schizophrenia) prior to administering medication after dosage increased and prior to administering new dosage ordered by physician. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk of not being informed of their health status which would allow them to make informed decisions regarding their care.Findings include: Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure PRN orders for psychotropic drugs were limited to 14 days, except if the attending physician or prescribing practitioner believed that it was appropriate for the PRN order to be extended beyond 14 days, he or she should document their rationale in the residents medical record and indicate the duration for the PRN order for 2 of 7 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility failed to ensure Resident #40's PRN Lorazepam (medicine used to treat the symptoms of anxiety) was discontinued after 14 days or document a rationale for the continued provision of the medication.The facility failed to ensure Resident #117's PRN Diazepam (medicine used to treat the symptoms of anxiety) was discontinued after 14 days or document a rationale for the continued provision of the medication. These failures could place residents at risk for adverse reactions and negative side effects from the administration of medication and dependence on unnecessary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to review the risks and benefits of bed rails with the resident or a resident representative and obtain informed consent prior to installation for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #22) reviewed for bed rail consents. The facility failed to obtain informed consent from Resident #22 or her representative or maintain evidence that Resident #22 or her representative had been provided with sufficient information so that they could make an informed decision prior to installing bed rails.This failure could place residents at risk for not being able to make an informed decision due to not having sufficient information on the risks of bed rail usage.Findings include:Record review of Resident #22's electronic face sheet, dated 02/19/2026, reflected an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #22 had diagnoses which included dementia (a general term for a range of conditions affecting memory, thinking,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and included the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable and, in accordance with State and Federal laws, drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls, and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 1 of 26 residents (Resident # 25)reviewed for label and storage of drugs and biologicals. The facility failed to ensure Resident #25's medications were locked and labeled when unattended.This failure could place residents at risk of having access to unauthorized medications, leading to possible harm or drug diversions. Findings include: Record review of Resident #25's electronic face sheet, dated 02/19/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #25 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to a meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment and describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 6 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #6, Resident #7) of 8 residents reviewed for comprehensive person-centered care plans.1. The facility failed to develop care plans based on assessed needs with measurable objectives in the areas of Hemiplegia/Hemiparesis, Hypertension, GERD, Dementia, and Anxiety for Resident #1.2. The facility failed to develop care plans based on assessed needs with measurable objectives in the areas of Parkinson's Disease, Hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus, diuretic therapy, edema, GERD, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 25 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to make sure that the comprehensive care plan was prepared by an interdisciplinary team that included a nurse aide with responsibility for the resident for 8 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #7, and Resident #8) of 8 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure the nurse aides with responsibility for the residents were invited and attended the resident care plan conferences. These failures could place the residents at risk for not receiving the care and services to meet their needs.The findings included: Resident #1: Record review of Resident #1's Facesheet, dated 07/03/2025, revealed Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female, with an admission date into the facility of 09/08/2023. Diagnoses included Unspecified Dementia (diagnosis given when a person's cognitive impairment was not clearly categorized into a specific type of dementia). Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, that were complete and accurate for 3 (Resident #1, Resident #3 and Resident # 7) of 7 residents reviewed for resident records. The facility failed to ensure weekly skin assessments were documented in the medical record for Resident #1, Resident #3, and Resident # 7. This failure could place residents at risk of having errors in care and treatment. The Findings included: Resident #1 Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 05/02/2025 revealed a [AGE] year-old-female admitted on [DATE], with the most recent admission on [DATE] and with the following diagnoses: Alzheimer's disease, respiratory failure, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side (weakness and partial paralysis of left side following a stroke). Record review of Resident #1's Significant Change MDS assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free from accident hazards as was possible and each resident received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #1 & Resident #2) reviewed for accidents and supervision. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1, and Resident #2 were properly supervised during smoke break to prevent agitation and altercations. These failures could place the residents at risk of injury. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's electronic health record revealed a [AGE] year-old female, admission date 11/04/2021, Diagnoses: hypertension (high blood pressure), unspecified dementia (brain degeneration) chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), major depressive disorder (persistent feelings of sadness, hopelessness, and loss of interest or pleasure in activities). Record review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infections for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for infection control practices. The facility failed to ensure CNA A performed proper hand hygiene and glove changes while providing incontinence care to Resident #1. This failure could place residents at risk for the spread of infection. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 01/10/25, revealed a 67- year- old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including frequency of micturition (urinating), constipation, muscle weakness and Alzheimer's disease (neurological disorder). Review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 required substantial/maximal assistance with most activities of daily living (ADLs). Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-04 · tag F0552 — pattern
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents/resident's representative had the right to be informed in advance, by the physician or other practitioner or professional, of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives or treatment options and to choose the alternative or option he/ she preferred for 2 of 26 residents (Resident #50 and Resident #114) reviewed for antipsychotic consents. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #50's HHSC Form 3713 for Ziprasidone (also known as Geodon an antipsychotic medication used to treat bipolar 1 disorder and schizophrenia) was signed by Resident #50 or Resident 50'ss responsible party. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #114's HHSC Form 3713 for Seroquel (an antipsychotic medication used to treat mental health disorders, such as schizophrenia) was signed by Resident #114 or Resident #114's responsible party. This failure could affect residents who received antipsychotics by placing them at risk of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-04 · tag F0644 — pattern
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to refer residents for PASRR screening and evaluation, with a newly evident mental disorder or related condition for level II PASRR review, 1 of 3 residents (Resident #107) in that: Resident #107 was not referred to the state-designated authority for PASRR re-evaluation upon evidence of past history significant for depression, anxiety, and PTSD when admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a negative PL1. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving adequate services or care related to mental illnesses. Finding include: Record review of Resident #107's Facesheet, dated 12/03/2024, revealed Resident #107 was a [AGE] year-old male, with an admission date into the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #107's Diagnosis Report, dated 12/03/2024, revealed Resident #107's admission primary diagnosis was Bipolar disorder, unspecified, effective 09/12/2023. Other diagnoses included Generalized Anxiety Disorder, which was dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles and included the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions for 2 of 6 medication carts (Hall B nurse medication cart & Hall A-D nurse medication cart) reviewed for medication labeling and storage. The facility failed to ensure Schedule II-V medications subject to abuse were stored so that shortage of medication was readily detectable for 1 of 2 medication rooms (Hall G-H medication room) reviewed for medication labeling and storage. 1. The facility failed to dispose of expired medications from Hall A-D nurse medication cart. 2. The facility failed to have pharmacy labels on 2 insulin flex pens from Hall B nurse medication cart. 3. The facility failed to have medication count sheets with controlled substances from Hall G-H medication room. These failures could place residents at risk of misappropriation of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-04 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food and drink that was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 4 of 26 Residents (Residents #8, #9, #120, and #376) and one (1) of one (1) kitchen. 1. Residents #8, #9, #120, and #376 voiced concerns of cold food, flavor, and/or texture. 2. One (1) of the three (3) foods sampled on the meal tray was cold. These failures could affect the residents by placing them at risk for malnutrition due to residents' decline in consumption in food, dissatisfaction of meals served, and residents to have unwanted weight loss. Findings include: Record review of Resident #120's Facesheet, dated 12/04/2024, revealed Resident #120 was a [AGE] year-old male, with an admission date into the facility of 09/12/2024. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease (a progressive neurological condition that affects the brain and causes movement and non-movement issues) with dyskinesia (a range of movement disorders that involve…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for service safety, in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure staff wore effective hair restraints. 2. The facility failed to ensure staff practiced appropriate hand hygiene during meal prep. These failures could place residents at risk of food borne illness and cross contamination. During an observation on 12/02/2024 at 10:45 a.m., [NAME] G cut a large sheet cake with no gloves on. [NAME] G had white tipped acrylic nails on her fingertips approximately ¼ inch in length. [NAME] G touched the cake with her left thumb on the left bottom of the pan as she held the pan to steady to cut. [NAME] G then wiped her left hand on the front of her left pant and pick up a knife and spread cool whip frosting over half of the sheet cake. [NAME] G picked up a permanent marker from a rolling cart that contained a bag of frozen bananas and wrote on a empty zip lock bag. [NAME] G the pushed then…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs, 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for Resident # 1 that included the edema in his lower extremities and resisting care. This failure could place the resident at risk for a decline in health and providers not having the most current information for the Resident's plan of care. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted on [DATE], with the following diagnoses: Downs syndrome (a genetic disorder caused by an extra set of chromosomes), peripheral vascular disease (a circulatory condition in which narrowed blood vessels reduce blood flow to the limbs), and aortic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medical record was complete and accurately documented for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for resident records. The facility failed to ensure LVN A and documented accurate skin assessments for Resident #1. These failures could place residents at risk of new or worsening pressure injuries, and not receiving required treatments and medications as ordered by the physician. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's discharge MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted on [DATE], with the following diagnoses: Downs syndrome (a genetic disorder caused by an extra set of chromosomes), peripheral vascular disease (a circulatory condition in which narrowed blood vessels reduce blood flow to the limbs), and aortic valve insufficiency (a condition in which a heart valve doesn't properly close, causing blood to flow backwards into the heart instead of pumping out). His BIMS score was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-29 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately inform the resident, consult with the resident's physician, and notify, consistent with his or her authority, the resident representative when there was an accident involving the resident which resulted in injury and had the potential for requiring physician intervention, a significant change in the resident's physical, mental or psychosocial status, or a decision to transfer or discharge the resident from the facility for 1 (Resident #1) of 4 residents reviewed for notification of changes. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's POA/resident representative was immediately notified when the resident had a change in condition that required her to be transported via ambulance to the hospital. The non-compliance was identified as PNC. The noncompliance began on 07/26/2027 and ended on 07/27/2027. The facility corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure placed residents at risk of not having the comfort and company of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, which were complete and accurately documented for 1 (Resident #1) of 4 residents reviewed for documentation. RN B failed to accurately document the notification of Resident #1's resident representative when Resident #1 had a change in condition and was sent via ambulance to the hospital. This failure could place residents at risk of inaccurate documentation in residents' records and decreased confidence in the facility staff. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet, dated 07/29/2024, revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included Unspecified Dementia (symptoms affecting memory, thinking, and social abilities), severe, without behavioral, psychotic, mood disturbances, or anxiety, Hypothyroidism (underactive thyroid), unspecified, Depression…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-23 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 2 (Resident #3 and Resident #7) of 6 residents reviewed who required working call lights for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure the call light in Resident #3 and Resident #7's room was in good working order. The string to activate call light was long enough to be within reach of residents in room. This failure could place residents at risk of not being able to alert staff to their room. Findings include: Record review of MDS dated [DATE] reflected . Resident #3 Female [AGE] years old, admitted on [DATE]. BIMS of 0, severe cognitive impairment. Medical Diagnosis of Alzheimer's (neurodegenerative disease). Resident's Care Plan dated 5/2/24 states the resident has a communication problem r/t impaired cognitive status, ensure/provide a safe environment: Call light in reach. Record review of MDS dated [DATE] reflected . Resident #7,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free from accident hazards as was possible and each resident received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 20 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents and supervision. CNA A failed to ensure Resident #1 was properly transferred by two persons using a Hoyer Lift to prevent accidents. This failure could place the residents at risk of injury. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's electronic health record revealed a [AGE] year-old male, admission date 09/06/2023, Diagnoses: muscle weakness, other lack of coordination, age-related physical debility, nondisplaced fracture of lateral end of unspecified clavicle (clavicle fracture), subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing, and repeated falls. Record review of Resident #1's MDS Resident Assessment and Care Screening , Section G, Functional Status revealed Transfer: 3=Extensive assistance; Two+…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-21 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #3) of 10 Residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments. - The facility failed to ensure the Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] reflected falls and Significant Change MDS dated [DATE] reflected accurate number of falls for Resident #1. - The facility failed to ensure the Significant Change MDS dated [DATE] reflected accurate number of falls for Resident #3. This failure could place residents at risk of inaccurate assessments and not receiving appropriate care according to their status. Findings include: Resident #1 Review of Resident #1's electronic face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to facility on 08/24/2021 with diagnoses to include: dementia, depression, schizophrenia, and repeated falls. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 01/18/2024, revealed a BIMS score of 15 which indicated no impaired cognition. Section J Health…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan based on assessed needs with measurable objectives that have the ability to be evaluated or quantified to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) of 10 residents reviewed for comprehensive person-centered care plans. The facility failed to develop care plans based on the assessed needs with measurable objectives and timeframes in areas such as impaired visual function, Seizure Disorder, and risk for falls for Resident #1. The facility failed to develop care plans based on the assessed needs with measurable objectives and timeframes in areas such as hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus, and risk for falls for Resident #2. The facility failed to develop care plans based on the assessed needs with measurable objectives and timeframes in areas such as Anticoagulant and Antiplatelet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observation, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan were prepared by an interdisciplinary team, that included but not limited to, a nurse aide or a registered nurse with responsibility for the resident for 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) of 10 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to invite and include the input of the nursing staff as members of the interdisciplinary team after the completion of the comprehensive assessment for Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3. This failure could place the residents at risk for decreased quality of life and not having their needs met. Findings include: Resident #1 Review of Resident #1's electronic face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to facility on 08/24/2021 with diagnoses to include: dementia, depression, schizophrenia, and repeated falls. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 01/18/2024, revealed a BIMS score of 15 which indicated no impaired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-21 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and records review, the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to implement an appropriate action plan to address identified quality deficiencies for 1 of 1 facility. The QAPI committee failed to implement the corrective actions outlined on the Plan of Correction dated 12/13/2023 for deficient practice F657. This failure placed residents at risk for substandard quality of care due to the failure of the facility to take action on an identified problem affecting resident safety. Findings include: Review of a CMS 2567 dated 11/16/23 revealed that, based on observation, interviews, and record review, a deficient practice was cited at F657 (Care Plan Timing and Revision) during the 11/16/23 SSA recertification survey. Interviews and records revealed that the facility failed to invite and include the input of the nursing staff as members of the interdisciplinary team after the completion of the comprehensive assessment. Review of the facility's 12/22/23 Plan of Correction which was submitted in response to the 02/15/23 SSA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observation, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan were prepared by a interdisciplinary team, that included but not limited to, a nurse aide with responsibility for the resident for 3 (Resident #5, Resident #6, and Resident #8) of 40 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to invite and include the input of the nursing staff as members of the interdisciplinary team after the completion of the comprehensive assessment for Resident #5, Resident #6, and Resident #8. This failure could place the residents at risk for decreased quality of life and not having their needs met. Findings include: Resident #5 Record review of Resident #5's Face Sheet, dated 10/26/2023, revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #5's diagnoses included Unspecified Dementia (mild memory disturbance due to known physiological condition), Unspecified severity, with agitation, Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), Oral Phase, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and included the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable for 2 (Hall G medication cart and Hall E medication cart) of 6 medication carts reviewed for medication labeling and storage. The facility failed to ensure that insulin stored on Hall G and Hall E's medication cart were properly labeled and not past the medications' expiration date. These failures could place residents at risk of harm or decline in health due to lack of potency of medications/biologicals. The findings included: During an observation on [DATE] at 08:54 a.m., the G Hall medication cart located at the nurses station inspected for medication storage and labeling revealed: 1. Two insulin lispro pen injectors not labeled with an open date. 2. Two insulin glargine pen injectors not labeled with an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for 1 of 1 kitchen's reviewed for food service safety. The facility failed to properly label food items in the refrigerators, and freezers. The facility failed to discard food items after the use by date in refrigerators and freezers. The facility failed to seal items to protect them from freezer burn in freezers. The facility failed to discard expired food items in the dry food storage areas. The facility failed to maintain clean, refrigerators and freezers. The facility staff failed to practice good hand hygiene while preparing and serving food. These failures placed residents at risk of food borne illnesses that ate from the facility kitchen. Findings included: During an observation on 11/12/23 at 10:06AM of the facility's 1 kitchen: Bakery Freezer 1 bag small purple berries with the date of 10/24 on the package no label to identify what it was. Later DM said that it was blueberry and that the staff should have put a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an encoded, accurate, and complete MDS discharge assessment was electronically transmitted to the CMS System for 1 (Resident #84) of 3 residents records reviewed for closed records. The facility did not ensure the discharge MDS assessment was completed and electronically transmitted as required for Resident #84. This failure could place residents at risk of facility not providing complete and specific information for payment and quality of measure purposes. Finding included: Review of Resident #84's electronic face sheet, accessed 11/15/2023, revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis to include: broken left leg, anxiety, and kidney disease. Further review of electronic face sheet revealed resident discharged home on [DATE]. Review of Resident #84's Discharge MDS dated [DATE], revealed assessment was not completed and had not been submitted. During an interview on 11/15/23 at 02:18 PM, the DON stated she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to accurately reflect the resident's status on the Discharge MDS for 1 (Resident #134) of 3 residents reviewed for closed records. The facility failed to properly code Resident #134's Discharge MDS assessment a 04 for discharge to short-term general hospital instead of 01 for discharged home. This deficient practice could result in missed or inaccurate care. The findings included: Review of Resident #134's electronic face sheet accessed on 11/15/23 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include: fusion of spine, heart failure, and kidney disease. Further review of electronic face sheet Resident #134 was discharged home on [DATE]. Review of Resident #134's Discharge MDS, dated [DATE] and transmitted 10/18/23, revealed: Section A- Identification Information discharge date [DATE] and discharge status 04 (short-term general hospital). Review of Resident #134's Discharge summary, dated [DATE], revealed date of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to properly store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for sanitization The facility failed to ensure that kitchen staff obtained food temperatures prior to serving meals on 09/04/2023, 09/14/2023,09/15/2023, 09/19/2023, 09/20/2023, 09/24/2023, 09/27/2023, 09/28/2023, 09/29/2023, 09/30/2023, 10/01/2023, 10/02/2023, and 10/03/2023. The facility failed to ensure plastic drinking cups were cleaned and sanitized properly. These failures could place residents that eat out of the kitchen at risk for food borne illnesses. Findings included: During an observation on 10/03/2023 at 9:45 AM of the kitchen revealed blanks on temperature logs for the month of October 2023. During an interview on 10/03/2023 at 9:45 AM the DM stated the cook was to write the temperatures of food when it was cooked on the temperature log. The DM stated if the cook did not write the temperature on log, then there was no way to prove that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$37,501 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $16,394 — penalty dated 2025-09-12
  • $21,107 — penalty dated 2024-02-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CREATIVE SOLUTIONS IN HEALTHCARE — 149 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.1-0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.2-0.2 vs chain
The other 148 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)
1 of 5Afton Oaks Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterHouston, TX 1 of 5Arlington Heights Health and Rehabilitation CenterFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Beltline Healthcare CenterGarland, TX 1 of 5Bluebonnet Nursing & RehabilitationKarnes City, TX 1 of 5Bluebonnet Point WellnessBullard, TX 1 of 5Brentwood Terrace Healthcare And RehabilitationParis, TX 1 of 5Buena Vida Nursing and Rehab-San AntonioSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Cottonwood Nursing & RehabilitationDenton, TX 1 of 5Countryview Nursing & RehabilitationTerrell, TX 1 of 5Dogwood Trails ManorWoodville, TX 1 of 5Downtown Health and Rehabilitation CenterFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Estates Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Fair Park Health & Rehabilitation CenterDallas, TX 1 of 5Five Points Nursing & Rehabilitation of College StCollege Station, TX 1 of 5Five Points at Lake Highlands Nursing and RehabDallas, TX 1 of 5Five Points of PflugervillePflugerville, TX 1 of 5Franklin Heights Nursing & RehabilitationEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Gilmer Nursing & RehabilitationGilmer, TX 1 of 5Grace Pointe Wellness CenterEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Graham Oaks Care CenterGraham, TX 1 of 5Greenhill VillasMount Pleasant, TX 1 of 5Heritage At Longview Healthcare CenterLongview, TX 1 of 5Huebner Creek Health & Rehabilitation CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Interlochen Health and Rehabilitation CenterArlington, TX 1 of 5Kenedy Health & RehabilitationKenedy, TX 1 of 5Kennedy Health & RehabLufkin, TX 1 of 5Lake Lodge Nursing & RehabilitationLake Worth, TX 1 of 5Lampstand Nursing and RehabilitationBryan, TX 1 of 5Lancaster Nursing & RehabilitationLancaster, TX 1 of 5Marine Creek Nursing & RehabilitationFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Mesa Vista Inn Health CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Mountain View Health & RehabilitationEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Navasota Nursing & RehabilitationNavasota, TX 1 of 5Normandy Terrace Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5North Pointe Nursing and RehabilitationWatauga, TX 1 of 5Park Place Care CenterGeorgetown, TX 1 of 5Parkview Manor Nursing and RehabilitationWeimar, TX 1 of 5Peach Tree PlaceWeatherford, TX 1 of 5Pebble Creek Nursing CenterEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Pecan Tree Rehab And Healthcare CenterGainesville, TX

Showing 40 of 148; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
BOWERS, SEANIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 07/01/2024
CISNEROS, ALFREDIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 02/18/2008
COBB, TRAVISIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 10/05/2022
COOPER, STEPHENIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 11/11/2022
HARDIN, SHERRIEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 09/04/2024
KERZEE, RICHARDIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 09/24/2007
KORENEK, PATRICIAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 05/05/2018
SOECHTING, PAULIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 11/22/2024
STRACK, JOEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 02/11/2022
HUGGINS, LINDAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/01/2022
WILLIG, ZACHARYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/01/2022
THOMPSON, JOHNNYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
CREATIVE SOLUTIONS IN HEALTHCARE AT GRANBURY LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/30/2025
BLAKE, GARYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2022
BLAKE, MALISAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/01/2022
MESSINA, LYDIAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 04/15/2025
WUSTERHAUSEN, KRISIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-11.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 73%Medicare 4%Other / private 23%

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$236per resident / day
operating cost
$7,177per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$212per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 455915. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next