No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Pebble Creek Nursing Center

11608 Scott Simpson Drive, El Paso, TX 79936 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (915) 857-0071 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Flagged for abuseBehavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)3 immediate-jeopardy citations1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$145,184 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0610) — most recent May 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (64) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $145,184 in federal fines (most recent 2025-05-20)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (97%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
11544 Vista del Sol Dr · (915) 592-2600 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1485 George Dieter Dr · (915) 521-7087 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Food King0.2 mi
1480 George Dieter Dr · (915) 857-6080 · Call to confirm hours
Park
11600 Vista del Sol Dr · (915) 865-7456 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
Renuevo0.2 mi
1480 George Dieter Dr · (915) 329-1897

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased21.1%15.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.6%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.5%0.3%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.1%0.8%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.6%2.4%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.4%3.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened14.7%14.0%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.5%18.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.5%3.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control17.1%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.3%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%88.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.9%25.7%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.6%12.3%12.0%typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

9.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.34U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.15hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 57% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.9%CMS range 6.7–14.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay3.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened10.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.3%CMS range 4.4–15.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.381.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.45
RN hours/ resident / day
0.88
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.06
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.38
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.38
RN hoursweekends
97.4%
Total nursing turnover
100.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 91.7 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 28 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.38 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.06 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.01 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.53 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.47 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 97% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-20)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-16)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

64 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 50 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation for 1 of 11 residents (Residents #16) reviewed for Neglect. The facility failed to immediately implement protective measures on 03/03/25 when the charge nurse reported to the DON concerns related to Resident #6 not receiving anticonvulsant medication according to the physician's order. The facility proceeded to allow the doses to be missed during the weekend of 3/08/25-03/09/25 without interventions/protections during that time. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 05/18/25. While the IJ was removed on 05/20/25, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated with a potential for more than minimal harm , due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. These failures could place residents at risk for further abuse and neglect. Findings include: Record Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free of significant medication errors for 1 (Resident # 16) of 6 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to administer Resident #16's Levetiracetam 100 mg/ml 7.5 ml by mouth two times on 03/08/25 at 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. and two times on 03/09/25 at 8:00 a.m. and at 8:00 p.m. according to physician orders. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 05/18/25. While the IJ was removed on 5/20/25, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of actual harm not IJ with a scope of pattern because the facility had not had time to monitor their plan of removal for effectiveness. This failure placed residents on anticonvulsant medications at risk for harm, or neglect. The findings included: Record Review of Resident #16's face sheet dated 05/15/25 revealed resident was a [AGE] year-old female with admission date 05/14/2024. Record Review of Resident #16's annual history and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-05-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure in response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment the facility had evidence that all alleged violations were thoroughly investigated and prevent further abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment while the investigation was in progress for 1 of 11 residents (Residents #16) reviewed for abuse/neglect. - The facility failed to investigate, prevent, correct, and report alleged violations of neglect for Resident #16 when reported by LVN C on 03/03/25. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 05/18/25. While the IJ was removed on 5/20/25, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of actual harm not IJ with a scope of pattern because the facility had not had time to monitor their plan of removal for effectiveness. These failures could place residents at risk for further abuse, and neglect. Findings include: Record Review of Resident #16's face sheet dated 05/15/25 revealed resident was a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure all residents were free from abuse for 1 (Resident #2) of 5 residents reviewed for abuse. On 08/01/24, CNA A was providing Perineal Care (cleaning the private areas of residents) to Resident #2. During the peri-care CNA A was observed being verbally and physically abusive, grunting, rough, and aggressive while turning Resident #2. CNA A was observed aggressively positioning Resident #2's legs and arms and aggressively putting on the brief, and Resident #2's bottoms. The following day 08/02/24 Resident #2 was assessed by the nursing staff revealing a 4 cm (a metric unit for the measurement of length of objects and small distances) by 3 cm left lower leg bruise, 7 cm by 4 cm left leg bruise, and 5 cm by 2 cm inguinal (relating to or situated in the region of the groin) area left side bruise. The noncompliance was identified as past non-compliance. The non-compliance began on 08/01/24 and ended 08/02/24 due to the facility having implemented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-22 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — pattern
    Hire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that it employed a qualified social worker on a full-time basis for one of one social worker positions reviewed for social services, in that: The facility, which was licensed for 120 beds, failed to employ a qualified social worker on a full-time basis since 05/20/2026.This failure put facility residents at risk of not having their psychosocial or discharge planning needs met. Findings included:Review of the Facility's Summary Report revealed the facility was licensed for 120 beds.Record review of the facility's Census Report dated 05/20/2026 revealed that the facility had a capacity of 120 beds and had a census of ninety-five.During a telephone interview on 05/22/26 at 2:08 p.m. with the current Social Worker J it was revealed he was hired on 05/19/26. He said, I have a master's degree in social services, and yes I am the social worker at the facility. He said he had finished school on 05/15/26 and was scheduled to take his licensing exam on 06/06/26 for Licensed Master Social Worker. He said he was responsible for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-22 · tag F0882 — pattern
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a designated Infection Preventionist who had completed specialized training in infection prevention and control for 2 of 2 nurses reviewed as designated Infection Preventionists.The facility failed to ensure DON and ADON LVN K, designated Infection Preventionists, completed the required specialized training in infection prevention and control.This failure could affect the facility's ability to appropriately recognize and respond to communicable diseases and infections including COVID-19.Findings include:During an interview on 05/22/26 at 10:37 a.m. with Regional Compliance Nurse M and DON revealed that the DON and ADONs implemented and monitored infection control protocols and surveillance activities for infection control. The state surveyor was provided with a copy of the training certificate for completion for Nursing Home Infection Preventionist Training Course - WB4973 dated 03/20/26 for ADON RN L.During an interview on 05/22/26 at 2:48 p.m. with ADON RN L she said, I am not the Infection Control Preventionist. I…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident had a right to be treated with respect and dignity including the right to be free from any physical or chemical restraints imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience, and not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for restraints. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3 was free from any physical restraint when a pillow was observed tucked under the bedsheet in a manner that restricted movement to Resident #3. This failure could place residents at risk for restricted movement, feeling of entrapment, decreased mobility, and possible injury.Record review of Resident #3's face sheet, dated 04/22/2026, reflected an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and then readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #13 had diagnoses which included Unspecified Dementia (decline in mental abilities), Amnesia (total loss of memory), Ataxia (lack of muscle control…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen. - The facility's kitchen staff failed to ensure a zip top bag that contained meat slices was sealed in the walk-in refrigerator on 03/28/2026.- The facility's kitchen staff failed to maintain safe consumable produce as evidence by overripened whole bananas with black peels in a container in the walk-in refrigerator. On 03/28/2026.-The facility's kitchen staff failed to ensure the rims of 2 containers in the walk-in refrigerator were free from dried drippings on 03/28/2026-The facility's kitchen staff failed to ensure whole eggs were sealed in a labeled and dated container in the walk-in refrigerator on 03/28/2026.-The facility's kitchen staff failed to ensure that two refrigerator temperature logs and one freezer temperature logs were filled out for the date of 03/27/2026 on 03/28/2026. These failures could place all residents who received meals from the kitchen at risk of food-borne…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-31 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for one of eight residents (Resident#1) reviewed for ADL care. -The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's face was clean and free of facial hair on 03/30/26.This failure could place residents who required assistance with ADL's at risk for unmet care needs.Findings included:Record review of Resident # 1's admission record dated 03/30/2026 revealed an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE].Record review of Resident #1's diagnosis list dated 03/30/2026 revealed age-related cognitive decline (normal gradual changes in memory) and polyosteoarthritis ( arthritis affecting multiple joints at one time causing pain stiffness and reduced mobility).Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 09 indicating moderate cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-17 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to and the facility must make prompt efforts to resolve grievances the resident may have and identify a Grievance Official who was responsible for overseeing the grievance process, receiving and tracking grievances through to their conclusion, leading any necessary investigations by the facility, maintaining the confidentiality of all information associated with grievances, issuing written grievances decisions to the resident, and coordinating with state and federal agencies as necessary in light of specific allegations for 1 of 1 grievance binders reviewed.The facility failed to ensure they were adhering to the facility grievance policy to receive and track grievances that were filed orally by residents prior to 3/13/2026.This failure could place residents at risk of not having their grievances properly resolved, tracked, and documented for future review.The findings include:During an observation conducted on 3/13/2026 at 2:45 PM, the Social Worker provided the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that the residents had the right to a dignified existence for 2 (Resident #5 & Resident #6) of 4 residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure the urinary collection bags for Resident #5 and Resident #6's catheters were covered with a privacy bag. This failure could place residents at risk for a loss of dignity, decreased self-worth and decreased self-esteem.Resident #5: Record review of Resident #5's face sheet dated 01/22/2026, revealed an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #5's diagnoses included disorder of urinary system (conditions affecting the structures near the urinary tract), Chronic viral Hepatitis C (affects the liver), Hypokalemia (low potassium in blood serum), Acute kidney disease (kidneys stop working), cirrhosis of the liver (liver damage). Record review of Resident #5's MDS dated [DATE], reflected a BIMS score of 00, which indicated severe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 3 of 4 residents (Resident #5, Resident #7, Resident #8) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure the urinary catheter bag for Resident #5, Resident #7, and Resident #8 were anchored and secured to prevent infection. This failure could place residents at risk of infection due to improper care practices.Resident #5: Record review of Resident #5's face sheet dated 01/22/2026, revealed an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #5's diagnoses included disorder of urinary system, Chronic viral Hepatitis C, Hypokalemia (Low Potassium in blood Serum) Acute kidney disease (kidneys stop working), cirrhosis of the liver. Record review of Resident #5's MDS dated [DATE], reflected a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality for 4 (Resident #1, Resident #8, Resident #9, Resident #15) of 6 residents reviewed for dignity with meal assistance. The facility failed to ensure that Residents #1 was assisted with eating while staff were seated at eye level.The facility failed to ensure that Residents #8 was assisted with eating while staff were seated at eye level.The facility failed to ensure that Residents #15 was assisted with eating while staff were seated at eye level.The facility failed to ensure staff asked Resident #9 if the resident wanted to wear a clothing protector. This failure could place residents at risk of inadequate monitoring during feeding, which could result in, reduce dignity, and hinder the ability to respond promptly to signs of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #12) reviewed for infection control in that: The facility failed to ensure staff followed infection control practices during wound care when Wound Care Nurse did not change gloves between contaminated and clean tasks for Resident #12. This facility failure could place residents at risk for worsening pressure injuries, pain, and a decline in health. Findings include:Record review of Resident #12's face sheet undated, revealed admission on [DATE] and re-admission on [DATE] to the facility. Record review of Resident #12's history and physical dated 7/28/25 revealed diagnoses of unspecified dementia (cases where the specific type of dementia cannot be clearly identified despite the presence of cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 50 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality for 6 of 15 residents reviewed (Resident #25, Resident #37, Resident #40, Resident #58, Resident #67, and Resident #76) for residents' rights, in that: The facility staff failed to knock before entering the room of Resident #25, Resident #37, Resident #40, Resident #58, Resident #67, and Resident #76. This failure could affect residents' self-esteem and dignity. The findings include: Resident #25 Record review of Resident #25's face sheet dated 05/15/25 revealed she was admitted on [DATE] to the facility and readmitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #25's history and physical dated 10/24/24 revealed a [AGE] year-old female diagnosed with major depressive disorder, insomnia and anxiety disorder. Record review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-20 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for 2 of 11 residents (Resident #22 and #88) reviewed for call light placement. The facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach for Residents #22 and #88. This failure could affect residents by not having access to call for assistance resulting in needs not being met. Findings included: Record review of Resident #22's face sheet dated 05/13/25 revealed resident was an [AGE] year-old female with admission date 10/09/24. Record review of Resident #22's history and physical dated 04/10/25 revealed the resident's following medical diagnoses: dementia, high blood pressure, hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol levels), chronic kidney disease (a condition that affects your kidneys' ability to filter waste from your blood), and obsessive-compulsive disorder (a mental health condition characterized by unwanted thoughts and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's environment was as free of accident hazards as possible for 3 of 30 residents (#18, #48, and #75) reviewed for accidents. -The facility failed to properly dispose of a retractable lancet device (small, pen like tool that holds a lancet (a small needle) used to prick the skin for blood sampling) in sharps container in one room (resident# 75). -The facility failed to properly dispose of a razor in one room (rResidents #18 and #48's room) This deficient practice could place residents at risk of harm or injury and contribute to avoidable accidents. The findings included: Resident #18 Record review of Resident #18's face sheet dated 05/16/2025 revealed a [AGE] year-old female that was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #18's History and Physical dated 03/25/25 revealed, Resident #18 was diagnosed with unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance. Record review of Resident #18's Quarterly MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-20 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food that was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature, for one test tray reviewed and for 3 residents (Resident #6, Resident #40 and Resident #41) of 18 residents interviewed in hallways 100 and 500. The facility failed to maintain food hot on regular diet, puree diet, renal diet, test trays and served cold meals to Resident #6, Resident #40 and Resident #41. This failure could place residents who ate in their rooms at risk of poor intake and/or foodborne illness. The findings included: Resident #6 Record review of Resident #6's face sheet dated 05/15/25 revealed she was originally admitted on [DATE] to the facility and readmitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #6's history and physical dated 10/30/24 revealed a [AGE] year-old female diagnosed with major depressive disorder, gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis (a condition where stomach contents, including acid, frequently flow back…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 out of 1 kitchen . The facility failed to cover and seal the meal carts containing the residents' meal trays while transporting them through four out of four hallways in the facility. The facility failed to ensure staff wore hairnets in the kitchen. The facility failed to maintain 1 ranch dressing container and 1 mayonnaise container free from drippings during the initial kitchen tour The facility failed to thaw ground meat under running cold water per policy during initial kitchen tour. The facility failed to maintain clean grease filters over the stovetop during the initial kitchen tour. The facility failed to maintain 2 of the 3 compartments' sinks within the appropriate temperature. These failures could place all residents who received meals from the main kitchen and place them at risk for food borne illness. The findings were: Meal Carts During observations on 05/13/25 at lunchtime, meal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that are complete and accurately documented for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #16) reviewed for clinical records, in that: The facility failed to ensure that LVN C documented completely and accurately in the resident's clinical record when Resident #16 had a seizure on 03/10/25. This deficient practice could affect residents that had history of seizures and at place them at risk of having incomplete and inaccurate medical records . The findings were: Record Review of Resident #16's face sheet dated 05/15/25 revealed resident was a [AGE] year-old female with admission date 05/14/2024. Record Review of Resident #16's annual history and physical dated 05/16/25 revealed Resident #16 was non-verbal and was prescribed Levetiracetam 100mg/ml solution 7.5ml by mouth twice a day for seizures. Record Review of Resident #16's annual MDS dated [DATE] revealed there was no BIMS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care is provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 (Resident #44) of 12 residents observed for oxygen management. -Resident #44 utilized oxygen in his room and did not have an oxygen sign posted outside of the room. This failure could place residents on oxygen therapy at risk of receiving incorrect or inadequate oxygen support and decline in health and at risk of fire hazards by not posting oxygen signs outside the residents' rooms. Findings include: Record review of Resident #44's face sheet dated 05/15/25 revealed he was admitted on [DATE] to the facility and readmitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #44's history and physical dated 05/05/24 revealed a [AGE] year-old male diagnosed with shortness of breath, sleep apnea (a common sleep disorder characterized by repetitive pauses in breathing or periods of shallow breathing during sleep), and acute…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designated to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 1 (Residents #75) of 31 residents reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to keep rResident #75's bed sheet clean and free of blood stains. These deficient practices could place residents at risk for infection due to improper care practices. Finding included: Record review of Resident #75's admission record dated 05/16/2025 revealed a [AGE] year-old male that was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #75's history and physical dated 04/08/25 revealed, Resident #75 was diagnosed with Diabetes mellitus type 2. Record review of Resident #75's five-day MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 14 indicating intact cognitive function. Record review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0576 — isolated
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to have reasonable access to the use of a telephone and a place in the facility where calls can be made without being overheard for 1 of 4 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for telephone use. The facility failed to provide a place for Resident #1 to make telephone calls without being overhead. This failure could place residents at risk of conversations being overheard and privacy rights not being respected. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 01/14/2025, reflected [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident # 1's History and Physical dated 10/13/2024, revealed diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder (mental health condition with symptoms of schizophrenia and a mood disorder where person may experience depression, mania and psychosis), anxiety (feeling of worry, nervousness, or unease, typically about an imminent event or something with an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical and nursing needs and described the services to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #8) of 9 residents reviewed for care plans. -The facility failed to follow the comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident #1's and #8's fall risk, by failing to have fall mats in place next to bed while residents were lying down in bed. This deficient practice could place residents in the facility at risk of not receiving the necessary care or services as indicated in their comprehensive person-centered plans developed to address their needs. Findings include: Resident #1: Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 01/14/2025, reflected [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE].…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living receives the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal and oral hygiene for 2 of 5 (Resident #2, Resident #7) residents reviewed for assistance with peri-care. CNA A failed to provide perineal care with professional standards to ensure Resident #2 was clean, free of contamination. CNA K failed to provide perineal care with professional standards for Resident #7 to ensure they were clean, free of contamination. This failure could place residents who were dependent on staff for ADL care at risk for infections. Findings include: Resident #2 Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 09/17/24, revealed, admission on [DATE] to the facility. Record review of Resident #2's facility history and physical dated 05/15/24, revealed, a [AGE] year-old female diagnosed with Down Syndrome (a condition in which a person has an extra chromosome or an extra piece of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that the residents environment remains as free of accidents hazards as is possible and each resident receives adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 (Resident #2) of 6 residents, and one (room [ROOM NUMBER]) of 5 rooms observed. During observations conducted on 05/14/24 at 9:08 am, the sharps container located in room [ROOM NUMBER] occupied by Resident #2, had two disposable razors exposed and reachable on top of the box. During observations conducted on 05/14/24 at 10:24 am, the sharps container located in room [ROOM NUMBER] had one syringe exposed and reachable on the top of the box. This failure could place residents at risk of accidents, and potential harm. Findings include: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 05/16/24, revealed Resident #2 was admitted on [DATE] and that he was a [AGE] year-old male with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction due to occlusion or stenosis (abnormal narrowing of a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for infection control. LVN E failed to use gown prior to providing care for Resident #46 who is on enhanced barrier precautions. RN F failed to use gown prior to providing care for Resident #74 who is on enhanced barrier precautions. This failure could place residents at risk for cross contamination and the spread of infection. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #46's face sheet indicated she was a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including gastrostomy (an opening into the stomach from the abdominal wall, made surgically for the introduction of food), cerebral infarction (also known as a stroke, refers to damage to tissues in the brain due to a loss of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the resident's had the right to be informed of the risks, and participate in, his or her treatment which included the right to be informed in advance, by the physician or other practitioner or professional, of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives or treatment options and to choose the alternative or option he or she preferred, for 3 of 20 residents (Resident#29, Resident #46, Resident # 90) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to obtain informed consent based on information of the benefits, risks, and options available from Resident #29 prior to administering Lorazepam, an antianxiety medication used to treat anxiety. The facility failed to obtain informed consent based on information of the benefits, risks, and options available from Resident #46 prior to administering Valproic Acid, a mood stabilizer . The facility also failed to obtain informed consent based on information of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure residents the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for 1 (Residents #1) of 6 residents reviewed for accommodation of needs: Resident #1's call light was not left within his reach or within sight. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their needs met and a decline in their quality of care and life. Findings included: Resident #1 Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 05/16/24, revealed Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] and that he was a [AGE] year-old male with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety, lack of coordination, cognitive communication deficit, cardiac arrhythmia (a condition in which the heart beats with an irregular or abnormal rhythm), muscle wasting and atrophy, difficulty in walking, muscle weakness…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide necessary services to maintain good grooming and hygiene for a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living for 2 residents out of 3 (Resident #45, Resident #40). The facility failed to provide personal hygiene for Resident #45 and facial hair care for Resident #40. This deficient practice placed residents at risk of poor hygiene and decline in residents' self-esteem. Findings included: A. Resident #45 Record review of Resident #45's face sheet dated 05/16/2024 revealed admission on [DATE] and re-admission on [DATE] to the facility. Resident #45 was a [AGE] year-old male diagnosed with UNSPECIFIED DEMENTIA, UNSPECIFIED SEVERITY, WITHOUT BEHAVIORAL Primary DISTURBANCE, PSYCHOTIC DISTURBANCE, MOOD DISTURBANCE, AND ANXIETY. Record review of Resident #45's admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed severe cognitive impairment to be able to make daily decisions based on a BIMS (an assessment used to monitor cognition) score…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY During observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents with urinary incontinence received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for 1 resident 1 (Resident #39). Resident #39's indwelling catheter tubing was laying on the floor. The facility failed to ensure Resident #39's subpubic catheter was properly secured . This failure placed resident at an increased risk of a Urinary Tract infection. The Findings included: Review of Resident #39's face sheet revealed an [AGE] year-old woman, who was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #39's history and physical dated 01/16/2023 revealed diagnoses of UTI (urinary tract infection), Alzheimer's, Dementia, Diabetes, Gross Hematuria (Blood in the urine). Record review of Resident #39's MDS dated [DATE] revealed no information regarding resident's daily decision making, or functional abilities and goals. Record review of Resident #39's care plan dated 04/03/2024 revealed she has an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nurse aides are able to demonstrate competency in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents' needs, as identified through resident assessments and described in the plan of care for 1 of 3 (Resident #14) residents reviewed for care, in that: CNA A changed Resident #14's colostomy bag and wafer without being trained on how to perform the procedure. (A colostomy wafer is a plastic ring that adheres to the skin around the stoma which is an opening in the stomach and connects to an ostomy bag. The wafer, also known as a flange, baseplate, or skin barrier, is designed to protect the skin from the stool that passes through the stoma. The ostomy bag collects the stool and can be detached from the wafer for disposal or cleaning).( An ostomy is a surgical procedure that creates an opening in your abdominal wall. This opening goes from an area inside your body to the outside, usually through your abdominal muscles and skin. Ostomy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permit only authorized personnel to have access to medications in medication cart 1 of 4 reviewed for label and storage of drugs and biologicals. The facility failed to ensure medication cart #1 was locked when unattended. The facility failed to ensure discontinued medication was locked in medication rooms. This failure could place residents at risk of having access to unauthorized medications and/or lead to possible harm or drug diversions. Findings included: During an observation and interview on 05/14/24 at 11:00am the medication cart #1 was left unattended and unlocked by LVN E. LVN E failed to lock medication cart #1 as she walked away from the medication cart to administer insulin. Medication cart #1 was unattended from 11:05 am to 11:13 am until she noticed and locked the cart. During an interview on 5/14/24 at 11:15 am LVN E stated that she must have overlooked the unlocked cart. LVN E stated that she was aware…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for Food safety. The facility failed to close and seal food and seasonings, dispose of expired foods, and maintain a vent free of dust build up. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk of food borne illness. Findings include: Observation and interview on 05/14/24 at 08:07am with dietary staff L. Observed the Cream of Tartar, Salt, and Dill weed seasonings are all opened. Dietary staff L stated they should not be opened and closed them correctly. Observation on 05/14/2024 at 09:09 am: inside the dry storage room they had about 6 bags of expired instant pudding that was dated February 22, 2024. Observation on 05/14/2024 at 08:59 am. Inside the walk-in refrigerator there was a cheese bag that was left opened and not sealed correctly. Observation on 05/14/2024 at 11:15 am: Dietary staff K was wearing crocs with the holes open on the side while preparing the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the MDS assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 (Resident #82) of 6 residents reviewed for accuracy of MDS assessments. - The facility failed to ensure that Resident #82's MDS accurately reflected resident's behaviors related to physical behaviors directed toward others. This deficient practice could affect residents who receive MDS assessments and could cause residents not to receive correct care and services. The findings were: Record review of Resident #82's admission record, dated 05/15/2024, revealed Resident #82 was a [AGE] year-old male with admission date of 02/03/2023. Resident diagnoses included cerebral infarction (damage to tissues in the brain due to a loss of oxygen to the area) and major depressive disorder (mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life). Record review of Resident 82's care plan last…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-15 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of needs for 2 (Residents #3 and #5) of 16 residents reviewed for call light button placement. -The facility failed to ensure that Residents #3's and #5's call lights were within their reach. This failure could place residents at risk of not being able to have their needs met. Findings included: Resident #3: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet dated 02/15/2024, revealed a [AGE] year-old female, with an initial admission date of 05/11/2020 and readmission date of 11/08/2023. Resident #3's diagnoses included: dementia (loss of cognitive functioning - thinking, remembering, and reasoning- to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities), gastrostomy status (surgical procedure used to insert a tube through the abdomen and into the stomach), seizures (sudden uncontrolled burst of electrical activity in the brain), lack of coordination, and history of falling. Record review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical and nursing needs, and services to be furnished to attain or maintain the residents highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 5 (Resident #2) residents reviewed for care plans. -The facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident #2 to include head of bed to be elevated 30 degrees due to continuous enteral feeding (nutrition delivered using the gut). This deficient practice could place residents in the facility at risk of not receiving the necessary care or services and not having personalized plans developed to address their needs. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 02/14/2024 revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of schizophrenia, contracture…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who is fed by enteral means receives the appropriate treatment and services for 2 of 5 (Resident #2 and Resident #15) reviewed for enteral feeding. -The facility failed to ensure that Resident #2 and Resident #15's head of bed was maintained at 30 degrees elevated according to physicians' orders. The failure could place residents receiving enteral feedings at risk of aspiration (when food or liquid goes into the lungs or airway). Findings include: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 02/14/2024 revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of schizophrenia, contracture of muscle on multiple sites, gastronomy status (surgical procedure used to insert a tube through the abdomen and into the stomach), muscle weakness, dysphagia (swallowing difficulties), and moderate protein calorie malnutrition. Record review of Resident #2's annual MDS assessment dated [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-30 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for 3 (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #4) of 7 residents reviewed for call light response time. The facility failed to respond in a timely manner to Resident #1, 2, and 4's call lights. Staff failed to respond to Residents #2's call light notification for 47 minutes. This failure puts residents at risk of not being able to get assistance when using the call light system whatever needs or incidents occur. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 10/27/23 revealed admission on [DATE] and readmission on [DATE] to the facility. Record review of Resident #1's history and physical dated 07/06/23 revealed a [AGE] year-old female diagnosed with cognitive decline, anxiety, and generalized weakness with activities of daily living. Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident medical and nursing needs to be furnished to attain or maintain the residents highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #7) reviewed for care plans in that: The facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident #7's oxygen therapy. This deficient practice could place residents in the facility at risk of not receiving the necessary care or services and having personalized plans developed to address their needs. Findings include: Record review of Resident #7's face sheet dated 10/25/23 revealed admission on [DATE] and readmission on [DATE] to the facility. Record review of Resident #7's history and physical dated 10/27/23 revealed an [AGE] year-old female diagnosed with muscle weakness (reduced muscle strength) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care is provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 2 (Resident #6 and Resident #7) of 10 residents observed for oxygen management. The facility failed to ensure Resident #6 and Resident #7 had an oxygen sign posted outside their bedrooms. This failure could place residents at risk of being exposed to combustion or flammability. Findings include: Record review of Resident #6's face sheet dated 10/25/23 revealed admission on [DATE] to the facility. Record review of Resident #6's history and physical dated 07/19/23 revealed an [AGE] year-old female diagnosed with shortness of breath, pulmonary effusion (occurs when fluid builds up in the space between the lung and the chest wall), and pulmonary embolism (sudden blockage in your pulmonary arteries, the blood vessels that send blood to your lungs). Record review of Resident #6's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide care that in accordance with professional statndards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's choices for 1 of 9 (Resident #8) residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility failed to administer diarrhea medication (Imodium) as prescribed for Resident #8 who had history of loose stools on: 09/21/23 at 1:59 pm and 9:39 pm, 09/22/23 at 12:23 am, 12:04 pm, 9:48 pm, 09/23/23 at 12:04 pm and 9:48 pm, 09/25/23 at 9:59 pm, 09/26/23 at 12:59 pm. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving their medications, not receiving the intended therapeutic effects of their medication and could contribute to possible adverse reactions. Findings included: Record review of Resident #8's face sheet dated 09/28/23 revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia (group of conditions characterized by impairment of at least two brain functions, such…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0559 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide written notice, including the reason for the change, before the resident's room or roommate in the facility is changed for 1 of 9 (Resident #9) residents reviewed for room changes. The facility failed to notify Resident #9's RP of room changes on 06/24/2023. This failure could place residents at risk for decrease quality of life being in a new environment. Findings include: Record review of Resident #9's face sheet dated 09/28/23 revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia (group of conditions characterized by impairment of at least two brain functions, such as memory loss and judgment). Family member was listed as Emergency Contact #1 and as Responsible Party (RP). Record review of Resident #9's MDS significant change in status assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 03, indicating she was severely cognitive impaired. Record review of Resident #9's progress note dated 06/24/23 written by LVN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to consult with the resident's physician when there is a need to alter treatment significantly (that is, a need to discontinue an existing form of treatment due to adverse consequences, or to commence a new form of treatment) for 1 of 9 (Resident #8) residents reviewed for notification to NP/MD. The facility failed to notify NP/MD of Resident #8's unresolved loose stools. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk of delay in medical treatment, hospitalization, and decline in condition. Findings include: Record review of Resident #8's face sheet dated 09/28/23 revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia (group of conditions characterized by impairment of at least two brain functions, such as memory loss and judgment), anxiety (feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness), gastrointestinal hemorrhage (blood often appears in stool or vomit). Record review of Resident #8's MDS significant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 9 (Resident #8) residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to develop a care plan addressing Resident #8's history of loose stools. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their individual care needs met, which could cause a decline in physical health, psychosocial health, and quality of care. Findings include: Record review of Resident #8's face sheet dated 09/28/23 revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia (group of conditions characterized by impairment of at least two brain functions, such as memory loss and judgment), anxiety (feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness), gastrointestinal hemorrhage…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care, is provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, the residents' goals, and preferences for 1 of 9 (Resident #8) residents reviewed for oxygen therapy. The facility failed to ensure Resident #8's oxygen tank was full while receiving oxygen therapy. This failure could affect residents receiving oxygen therapy at risk for respiratory distress. Findings include: Record review of Resident #8's face sheet dated 09/28/23 revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia, anxiety, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. Record review of Resident #8's MDS change in status assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 03, indicating she was severely cognitive impaired. Was coded with no oxygen use. Record review of Resident #8's physician orders for September 2023 revealed may use oxygen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility is free of pests and rodents for residents for 1 of 9 (Resident #9) residents reviewed for environment. The facility failed to keep Resident #9's room clean to avoid ants in room. This was determined to be past non-compliance at potential for more than minimal harm due to the facility having implemented actions that corrected the non-compliance prior to the beginning of the inspection. Findings include: Record review of Resident #9's face sheet dated 09/28/23 revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia (group of conditions characterized by impairment of at least two brain functions, such as memory loss and judgment). Family member was listed as Emergency Contact #1 and as Responsible Party (RP). Record review of Resident #9's MDS significant change in status assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 03, indicating she was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-05 · tag F0577 — pattern
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to post notice of the availability of the most recent survey of the facility conducted by Federal or State surveyors and any plan of correction reports in areas of the facility that were prominent and accessible to the public. 1. The facility failed to verbally inform residents or by posting a sign letting the residents know the location of the most recent survey results. This failure could place residents at risk of not being able to fully exercise their rights to be informed of the facility's survey citation history. Findings include: Observation on 04/03/2023 at 2:25 PM with the Receptionist revealed the state survey book was located on a low shelf in a desk in the front entrance of the facility. No signs were posted to indicate where the state survey book was located. In a confidential interview five of seven residents interviewed did not know they could review past survey reports or where these survey reports could be found. Interview on 04/03/2023 at 2:30 PM, the Receptionist stated she did not know where the results of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the residents' rights that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 2 of 10 (Residents #3 and #26) residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3 comprehensive care plan addressed Resident #3's oxygen. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #26 pommel cushion in was included on her care plan. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs. Finding include: 1. Record review of Resident #3's face sheet, dated 4/5/23, revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #3's local hospital history and physical, dated 2/7/23,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-05 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — pattern
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to restore, if possible, oral eating skills and to prevent complications of enteral feeding which included but not limited to aspiration pneumonia, diarrhea, vomiting, dehydration, metabolic abnormalities, and nasal-pharyngeal ulcers for 2 of 10 residents (Resident # 193 and Resident #87) reviewed for enteral feeding. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #193 enteral feeding was changed within 48-hour period. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #87's enteral feeding bag label had the time the administration of the feeding was begun and did not have the rate of administration. The feeding pump did not correctly reflect the amount of formula that had been delivered to the resident. These failures could place residents at risk of insufficient nutritional supplementation and possible weight loss. Findings include: 1. Record review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-05 · tag F0694 — pattern
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received parenteral fluids must be administered consistent with professional standards of practice and in accordance with physician orders for 2 of 10 residents (Resident #197 and Resident #14) reviewed for midline/picc care. 1. Resident #197's midline (intravenous catheter) was dated 3/8/23, edges of dressing were loosened and dry blood around insertion site. 2. Resident #14 picc line dressing was not dated These failures placed residents at risk of developing an infection. Findings included: Record review of Resident #197's face sheet, dated 4/5/23, revealed an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #197's local hospital history and physical, dated 2/26/23, revealed a diagnosis of necrosis (death of body tissue) of the left 3rd toe. Record review of Resident #197's admission nurse note, dated 3/7/23, in the cardiovascular section revealed Resident #197 had an IV…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who needed respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, the residents' goals and preferences for 2 of 10 residents (Residents #3 and Resident #86) reviewed for respiratory care. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3 received oxygen according to physician orders. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #86 received oxygen according to physician orders. 3. The facility failed to ensure the residents on oxygen in 4 of 10 rooms (403, 404, 405, 414) had oxygen signs posted outside their bedrooms as there were no signs posted outside of their bedroom for oxygen use. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving incorrect or inadequate oxygen support and decline in health. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #3 face sheet, dated 4/5/23, revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 (kitchen) kitchen reviewed for food and nutrition services 1. The facility failed to ensure food products in the dry storage, freezer, and in the refrigerator were correctly labeled, wrapped, and were not expired. 2. The facility failed to ensure 2 of 6 kitchen staff effectively wore hairnets exposing their hair. These failures could place residents at risk of food borne illness. Findings include: Observations on 04/02/2023 at 8:05 AM with the Dietary Manager revealed in regular the refrigerator there was outdated or not labeled nectar drinks in 4 different containers. The dry storage are had yellow cornbread not labeled, brownie mix was expired, cereal bags not labeled or dated, chocolate chips expired, sugar was left open. The walk-in refrigerator had cheese unlabeled, pork unlabeled, apple sauce was expired, beans was not labeled, oranges, jelly, ranch, salsa de tomato were not labeled or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-05 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from any physical or chemical restraints imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience and not required to treat the residents medical symptoms for one of 10 residents (Resident #26) reviewed for restraints The facility failed to assess and document Resident #26's need for a pommel cushion in her wheelchair. This failure could place residents at risk of having items that restrict their movement without the items having been evaluated for their necessity to treat medical symptoms or conditions. Findings include: Record review of Resident #26's face sheet, dated 04/05/2023, documented [AGE] year old female who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #26's History and Physical, dated 10/27/2022, documented she had diagnoses which included unspecified fracture of skull, muscle weakness, and unspecified convulsions. Record review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-05 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for 2 of 10 residents (Residents #3 and Residents #26) reviewed for accuracy of assessments . 1. The facility failed to accurately reflect Resident #3's oxygen therapy on the Quarterly MDS assessment. 2. The facility failed to accurately reflect Resident #26 use of a pommel cushion in her wheelchair on her Annual MDS assessment. These failures could place residents at risk for inaccurate and incomplete MDS assessment which could cause residents not to receive correct care and services. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #3 face sheet, dated 4/5/23, revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #3 local hospital history and physical, dated 2/7/23, revealed diagnoses which included dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-05 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that met professional standards of quality care and the facility failed to ensure the baseline care plan was developed within 48 hours of a resident's admission for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #197) reviewed for baseline care plan. The facility failed to ensure Resident #197 had a baseline care plan that addressed her midline IV catheter. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the care and services and continuity of care. Findings include: Record review of Resident #197's face sheet, dated 4/5/23, revealed an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #197's local hospital history and physical, dated 2/26/23, revealed a diagnosis of necrosis (death of body tissue) of the left 3rd toe. Record review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for 1 of 12 residents (Resident # 57) reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #57's catheter bag was not on the floor. This failure place residents at increased risk for urinary tract infections. Record review of Resident #57's face sheet, dated 04/05/2023, documented a [AGE] year-old female who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #57's admission History and Physical, dated 05/06/2022, documented she had a Foley (urinary) catheter in place. Her diagnoses included unspecified dementia (memory loss affecting daily activities) and that she had urinary incontinence (involuntary loss of urine from the bladder) . Record review of Resident #57's electronic diagnosis listing, accessed 04/05/2023, documented she had dementia , neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (lacked bladder control…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation , interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, which included procedures that assured the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals, to meet the needs of each resident for 1 resident of 7 residents (Residents #69) reviewed for pharmacy services. 1. The facility failed to ensure LVN D did not administer expired insulin to Resident#69. 2. The facility failed to ensure LVN D administered insulin to Resident #69 according to Manufacturer's Specifications. 3. The facility failed to maintain an accurate record of controlled drug destruction. These deficient practices could result in a decline in health due to incorrect monitoring of medication after administration and an accurate record of controlled drug destruction could result in drug diversion. Findings include: 1. Record Review of Resident #69's face sheet, dated 04/05/23, revealed an [AGE] year-old female with an admission date of 05/13/21. Record Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-05 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the pharmacist reported any irregularities to the attending physician and the facility's medical director and director of nursing, and failed to ensure these irregularities were acted upon for one resident of five residents (Resident #51) reviewed for Drug Regimen Review. The facility failed to ensure the physician gave a reason for not accepting the pharmacy consultant recommendation in January 2023 that Resident #51 received gradual dose reduction for Risperdal (an antipsychotic). This deficient practice could place residents at risk of receiving unnecessary medications and dosages. Findings include: Record review of Resident #51's face sheet, dated 04/03/2023, documented a [AGE] year-old and female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #51's History and Physical, dated 09/09/2020, documented she had diagnoses which included schizophrenia (illness where people interpret reality abnormally), depression (persistent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-05 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who used psychotropic drugs received gradual dose reductions, and behavioral interventions, unless clinically contraindicated, in an effort to discontinue these drugs for one resident of five residents (Resident #51) reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility failed to ensure Resident #51 received a gradual dose reduction for Risperdal (an antipsychotic). This deficient practice could place residents at risk of receiving unnecessary medications and dosages. Findings include: Record review of Resident #51's face sheet, dated 04/03/2023, documented a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #51's History and Physical, dated 09/09/2020, documented she had diagnoses which included dementia (problems with memory, thinking and social abilities that interfere with daily life), schizophrenia (illness where people interpret reality abnormally), depression (persistent sadness and loss of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-05 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure medication error rates were not 5 percent or greater. There were 2 errors out of 27 opportunities which resulted in a 7.41 percent error rate which involved 1 of 7 residents (Residents #69) reviewed for medications. 1. The facility failed to ensure LVN D did not administer expired insulin to Resident#69. 2. LVN D failed to ensure Resident #69 received a nutritional snack/meal within 15 minutes according to manufacturer's specifications . These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving medications according to physician orders. Findings include: Record review of Resident #69's face sheet, dated 04/05/23, revealed an [AGE] year-old female with an admission date of 05/13/21. Record review of Resident #69's History and Physical, dated 10/26/22, revealed a diagnosis which included Diabetes. Record review of physician orders, dated 4/5/2023, revealed NovoLog Flex Pen (Insulin Aspart) inject as per sliding scale,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-05 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #69) reviewed for significant medication errors. LVN D failed to administer insulin to Resident #69 according to Manufacturer's Specifications. This deficient practice could place residents' at risk of hypoglycemia . The findings include: Record review of Resident #69's face sheet, dated 04/05/23, revealed an [AGE] year-old female with an admission date of 05/13/21. Record review of Resident #69's History and Physical, dated 10/26/22, revealed a diagnosis which included Diabetes. Record Review of Resident #69's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 01/14/2023, revealed Resident #69 had a BIMS score of 7, which indicated she had severe cognitive impairment. In section, I of the MDS assessment Resident #69 had an active diagnosis of diabetes, malnutrition (lack of proper nutrition), and anemia (lack of red blood cells in the blood). Record Review Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medical records , in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, were maintained on each resident that were accurately documented for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #197) reviewed for medical records. The facility failed to ensure Resident #197's treatment administration record accurately documented treatment for the residents midline dressing. This failure could place residents at risk of infection by not receiving treatment as ordered by physician. Findings include: Record review of Resident #197's face sheet, dated 4/5/23, revealed an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #197's local hospital history and physical, dated 2/26/23, revealed a diagnosis which included necrosis (death of body tissue) of the left 3rd toe. Record review of Resident #197's admission nurse note, dated 3/7/23,in the cardiovascular section revealed Resident #197 had an IV access, midline…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-07-02 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure nurse staffing data was posted and readily accessible to residents and visitors for two days (06/30/2024, and 07/01/2024) reviewed for nurse staffing information. The facility failed to post and maintain the required nursing staffing information to include facility name, current date, current resident census, and total number and actual hours worked by licensed and unlicensed nursing staff for dates of June 29th and July 1st, 2024. These failures could place residents, their families, and facility visitors at risk of not having access to information regarding facility regarding staffing schedule and facility census. Findings included: During an observation on 07/01/2024 at 8:40 a.m., the public access area walls located between residential hallways near nursing stations revealed daily staffing sheet posting information dated 06/29/2024. The current date and information on staff scheduled and total hours worked were not posted. During observation and interview on 07/01/2024 at 11:04 a.m., the public…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$145,184 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $137,014 — penalty dated 2025-05-20
  • $8,170 — penalty dated 2024-09-20
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-06-19 for 70 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CREATIVE SOLUTIONS IN HEALTHCARE — 149 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.7-1.7 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.1-0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.2-1.2 vs chain
The other 148 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)
1 of 5Afton Oaks Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterHouston, TX 1 of 5Arlington Heights Health and Rehabilitation CenterFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Beltline Healthcare CenterGarland, TX 1 of 5Bluebonnet Nursing & RehabilitationKarnes City, TX 1 of 5Bluebonnet Point WellnessBullard, TX 1 of 5Brentwood Terrace Healthcare And RehabilitationParis, TX 1 of 5Buena Vida Nursing and Rehab-San AntonioSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Cottonwood Nursing & RehabilitationDenton, TX 1 of 5Countryview Nursing & RehabilitationTerrell, TX 1 of 5Dogwood Trails ManorWoodville, TX 1 of 5Downtown Health and Rehabilitation CenterFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Estates Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Fair Park Health & Rehabilitation CenterDallas, TX 1 of 5Five Points Nursing & Rehabilitation of College StCollege Station, TX 1 of 5Five Points at Lake Highlands Nursing and RehabDallas, TX 1 of 5Five Points of PflugervillePflugerville, TX 1 of 5Franklin Heights Nursing & RehabilitationEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Gilmer Nursing & RehabilitationGilmer, TX 1 of 5Grace Pointe Wellness CenterEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Graham Oaks Care CenterGraham, TX 1 of 5Granbury Care CenterGranbury, TX 1 of 5Greenhill VillasMount Pleasant, TX 1 of 5Heritage At Longview Healthcare CenterLongview, TX 1 of 5Huebner Creek Health & Rehabilitation CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Interlochen Health and Rehabilitation CenterArlington, TX 1 of 5Kenedy Health & RehabilitationKenedy, TX 1 of 5Kennedy Health & RehabLufkin, TX 1 of 5Lake Lodge Nursing & RehabilitationLake Worth, TX 1 of 5Lampstand Nursing and RehabilitationBryan, TX 1 of 5Lancaster Nursing & RehabilitationLancaster, TX 1 of 5Marine Creek Nursing & RehabilitationFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Mesa Vista Inn Health CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Mountain View Health & RehabilitationEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Navasota Nursing & RehabilitationNavasota, TX 1 of 5Normandy Terrace Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5North Pointe Nursing and RehabilitationWatauga, TX 1 of 5Park Place Care CenterGeorgetown, TX 1 of 5Parkview Manor Nursing and RehabilitationWeimar, TX 1 of 5Peach Tree PlaceWeatherford, TX 1 of 5Pecan Tree Rehab And Healthcare CenterGainesville, TX

Showing 40 of 148; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
HUGGINS, LINDAIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 10/01/2018
CREATIVE SOLUTIONS IN HEALTHCARE INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2018
BLAKE, GARYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2018
BLAKE, MALISAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2018

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+2.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 83%Medicare 3%Other / private 14%

About 83% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$218per resident / day
operating cost
$6,634per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$223per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 455718. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next