Grace Pointe Wellness Center
2301 N Oregan St, El Paso, TX 79902 · For profit - Corporation · 154 certified beds · (915) 532-8941 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0609, F0610) — most recent Apr 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 5 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (55) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $76,770 in federal fines (most recent 2025-04-11)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 17.3% | 15.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.5% | 3.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.5% | 2.4% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.1% | 3.3% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 8.8% | 14.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 14.1% | 18.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.8% | 3.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 8.6% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 19.7% | 9.6% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 9.4% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 88.0% | 79.4% | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 27% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 50% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.6%CMS range 6.4–15.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.30 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 154 beds and averages 55.1 residents a day — about 36% occupied, or roughly 99 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.62 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.43 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.00 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.95 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.90 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.54 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
55 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation for 1 of 7 residents (Residents #1) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure residents right to be free from abuse when Resident #1 reported sexual abuse by CNA O to staff in January 2025 and the alleged perpetrator was not suspended, the allegation was not investigated, and the facility did not report the suspected crime to local law enforcement and the State Agency, resulting in failure to protect residents from further potential criminal activity by an alleged perpetrator. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 04/09/25. While the IJ was removed on 04/10/25, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated with a potential for more than minimal harm, due to the facility need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. These failures could place residents at risk for further abuse,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury to the administrator of the facility and to other officials including the State Survey Agency in accordance with State law through established procedures for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for abuse. -The Facility Administrator failed to report a suspected crime to local law enforcement and the State Survey Agency, resulting in failure to protect residents from further potential criminal activity by an alleged perpetrator when Resident #1 reported sexual abuse by CNA O to staff in January 2025. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 04/09/25. While the IJ was removed on 04/10/25, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-04-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure in response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment the facility had evidence that all alleged violations were thoroughly investigated and prevent further abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment while the investigation was in progress for 1 of 7 residents (Residents #1) reviewed for abuse/neglect. 1. The facility failed to investigate an allegation of sexual abuse of Resident #1. 2. The facility failed to prevent further potential abuse and mistreatment by allowing the alleged perpetrator to remain in the facility and to have direct contact with the residents. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified 04/09/25. While the IJ was removed on 04/10/25, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated with a potential for more than minimal harm, due to the facility need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. These failures could place residents at risk for abuse,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2024-03-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to immediately notify and consult with the resident's physician when a significant change in a resident physical, mental, or psychosocial status (that was, a deterioration in health, mental, or psychosocial status in either life-threatening conditions or clinical complications for 1 of 5 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for change in condition. The facility failed to immediately inform NP/MD of Resident #1's change in condition addressing cyanotic episode (change of body tissue color to a bluish-purple hue, as a result of decrease in the amount of oxygen) to fingertips and lips. Resident #1's MD/NP was not notified of change in condition from approximately 8:00 a.m. to 10:36 p.m. on [DATE]. This failure resulted in an identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on [DATE]. The IJ template was provided to the Administrator and DON on [DATE] at 2:51 p.m. The IJ was removed on [DATE], but the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2024-03-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's choices for 1 of 5 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to immediately inform NP/MD of Resident #1's change in condition addressing cyanotic episode (change of body tissue color to a bluish-purple hue, as a result of decrease in the amount of oxygen) to fingertips and lips. Resident #1's MD/NP was not notified of change in condition from approximately 8:00 a.m. to 10:36 p.m. on [DATE]. This failure resulted in an identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on [DATE]. The IJ template was provided to the Administrator and DON on [DATE] at 2:51 p.m. The IJ was removed on [DATE], but the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity of potential for more than minimal harm due to the facility's need to monitor their corrective actions. This failure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-17 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — patternHire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that it employed a qualified social worker on a full-time basis for one of one social worker positions reviewed for social services. The facility, which was licensed for 154 beds, failed to employ a qualified social worker on a full-time basis since 02/09/2026. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their psychosocial or discharge planning needs met. Record Review on 06/16/2026 at 02:27 PM, of an email sent to SW on May 27, 2026, from The Association of Social Work Boards (ASWB) revealed a passing score on the ASWB master's examination. Received preliminary requirements for licensure in the state of Texas and how to obtain forms and instructions on ways to complete the licensing process in the state of Texas,In an interview on 06/16/2026 at 02:35 PM SW stated she had been employed with the facility since February 2026. She stated she had been informed upon hire that she was required to obtain her license within six months of employment. The SW was unable to provide documentation or an employment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-17 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to appropriately discharge for 1 (Resident #3) of 1 resident reviewed for transfer/discharge. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3 was provided a proper 30-day discharge letter from the facility after an incident with LVN R. This failure could place residents at risk of being discharged inappropriately causing a disruption in their care and services and potential decline in health.Record review of Resident #3's face sheet dated 06/16/2026, revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and still currently a resident at the facility. Resident #3's diagnoses included Depressive Disorders (feelings of sadness, tearfulness, emptiness or hopelessness), Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (Mental Health Condition that triggered by experiencing or witnessing a terrifying event), and Schizophrenia (brain disorder that makes it hard to tell the difference between what was real and what was imaginary),Record review of Resident #3's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality for 2 of 8 residents (Residents #2 and Resident #15) reviewed for dignity. -The facility failed on 03/10/2026 to assist Resident #2 to shave her facial hair.-The facility failed on 03/10/2026 and 03/11/2026 to cover Resident #15's genitals and anus. The deficient practice could affect residents by contributing to poor self-esteem, dignity issues and diminished quality of life.The findings included:Record review of Resident #2's face sheet revealed Resident #2 was a 69 year old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #2's history and physical revealed diagnoses including morbid obesity (severely elevated body weight that increases health risks), schizoaffective disorder (mental illness…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-12 · tag F0680 — patternEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the activities program was directed by a qualified professional who was a qualified therapeutic recreation specialist or an activities professional for 1 of 1 (activities staff) reviewed for staff qualifications.The facility failed to ensure the activities staff had completed State approved training to direct facility activities.This failure could place residents who participated in facility activities at risk of physiological, psychological, social, and spiritual harm by receiving services from unlicensed personnel.Findings include:During an interview on 3/11/2026 at 8:47 AM the Receptionist stated that the Activities Assistant was the only individual in the Activities department.During an observation on 3/11/2026 at 10:14 AM, the Activities Assistant lead an activity independently with 14 residents present and engaged in physical stretching, meditation, and prayer.During an interview on 3/12/2026 at 10:03 AM the HR Coordinator stated the activities department consisted of one Activities Assistant and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for sanitation and food storage. -The facility failed to ensure dietary staff followed proper food safety practices for cooling and storing prepared food on 03/10/2026. This failure had the potential to place all residents who received meals from the main kitchen at risk for foodborne illness due to, improper food storage practices.Findings included: During an observation on 3/10/2026 at 8:37 a.m. in the facility's kitchen, inside refrigerator #1 revealed: a steam table pan containing oatmeal was observed stored on the bottom rack of the refrigerator, covered with plastic food wrap. Upon assessment, the pan containing oatmeal was noted to be hot to the touch at the time of storage. During an interview on 03/10/2026 at 10:40 a.m., the [NAME] stated hot oatmeal should not have been placed directly into the refrigerator and explained that food must be allowed to cool prior to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-12 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in safe operating condition for 1 of 3 dryers reviewed.The facility failed to ensure the furthest right dryer was operational.This failure placed residents at risk for delay in having their clothes and bedding returned without delay.During an observation on 3/11/2026 at 3:09 PM of the laundry room revealed Laundry Aide I was utilizing 2 of 3 dryers in the laundromat. The furthest right Dryer was rusted, had dust, and was missing its operational panel that covered the top portion of the dryer. The dryer was non-responsive despite moving the knobs and checking for power to the machine. Laundry Aide I confirmed the 3rd dryer was non-operationalDuring an interview on 3/11/2026 at 3:10 PM with Laundry Aide I, she stated she had worked at the facility for 2 years and the 3rd dryer has not been operational for approximately a year. She stated she was not the individual who reported it the dryer was non-operational but suspected it was the day shift…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were provided services with reasonable accommodation of needs and preferences for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #10) reviewed for call lights. The facility failed to ensure Resident #10's call light was within reach on 03/10/2026.This failure placed residents at risk of having their needs unmet when they were unable to contact staff.Findings included:Record review of Resident # 10's admission Record revealed an [AGE] year-old male with an initial admission date of 04/07/2023 and a readmission date of 12/12/2024. Record review of Resident #10's History and Physical dated 10/07/2025 revealed a diagnosis of Dementia (decline in brain function including memory, thinking, and reasoning). Record review of Resident #10's Quarterly MDS assessment revealed a BIMS score of 02 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Section GG revealed resident needed supervision or touching assistance for toileting meaning that the helper provides…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for one of eight residents ( Resident #2) reviewed for ADL care. The facility failed on 03/10/2026 to ensure Resident #2's fingernails were clean and trimmed. This failure could place residents who required assistance with ADLs at risk for unmet care needs.Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet revealed Resident #2 was a 69 year old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #2's history and physical revealed diagnoses including morbid obesity (severely elevated body weight that increases health risks), schizoaffective disorder (mental illness involving mood symptoms and psychosis), unspecified psychosis (loss of contact with reality), bipolar disorder with manic episode and psychotic features (severe mood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 (Resident #18) of 5 residents observed for oxygen management.The facility failed to ensure Resident #18's nasal canula was properly stored while oxygen was not in use. This failure could place residents on oxygen therapy at risk of receiving incorrect or inadequate oxygen support and decline in health.The findings include:Record review of Resident #18's admission Record dated 03/10/2026 revealed a [AGE] year-old male with an admission date of 06/06/2025. Record review of Resident #18's History and Physical dated 09/09/2025 revealed a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder(Long term lung condition caused by damage to the airways and lungs leading to reduced air flow and difficulty breathing). Record review of Resident #18's Comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 09…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility was free of pests and rodents for 1 of 1 dining rooms reviewed.- 1 living cockroach was in the dining room.-The facility failed to dispose of 1 dead cockroach in the dining room.-The facility failed to dispose of 5 dead cockroaches in the Air Conditioning unit room.This failure placed residents at risk for a facility wide infestation of cockroaches. Findings include:During an observation on 3/11/2026 at 11:05 AM, a live cockroach was discovered in the dining room and was acknowledged by the Activities Assistant. A dead cockroach was found between the wall and the furniture table in the dining room near the air conditioning unit. Inside the air conditioning unit room, 5 additional dead cockroaches were found to the right of the doorway. Activities Assistant proceeded to pass out coffee and stepped over the cockroach at 11:28 AM. Residents sitting in the dining room exterminated the cockroach at 11:37 AM and was left at the table side by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 40 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-31 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pharmacy services.The facility failed to document accurately on Resident #1's EMAR for Acetaminophen with Codeine 300-30 MG tablet, 1 tablet. This failure could place residents at risk of inaccurate drug administration and not having appropriate therapeutic effects.Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 12/29/25 noted she was a [AGE] year-old female with admission date 08/28/25.Record review of Resident #1's health and physical dated 12/23/25 revealed a medical history of Lupus Erythematosus (an autoimmune disease where the immune system mistakenly attacks the body's own tissues, causing inflammation and tissue damage).Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-01 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — patternHire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that it employed a qualified social worker on a full-time basis for one of one social worker positions reviewed for social services, in that: The facility, which was licensed for 154 beds, failed to employ a qualified social worker on a full-time basis since 08/14/2025. This failure put facility residents at risk of not having their psychosocial or discharge planning needs met. Findings included:Record review of the facility census dated 09/24/2025 revealed that the facility had a capacity of 154 beds and had a census of fifty-four. During an interview and record review on 09/25/25 at 12:49 PM with the Administrator revealed, the Social Worker had resigned a month ago. He said they hired a social worker on 08/29/25, and she only worked for about a week and resigned for personal reasons. He said they just hired a social worker to start on 10/07/25. He said their company had multiple facilities in town and he had not reached out for help with social services at his facility. He said the potential risk of not having a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-01 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure efforts were made to resolve resident grievances, for one (Resident #1) of four resident reviewed for grievance resolution. The facility did not issue a written decision to Resident #2 who filed a grievance on 09/05/25 and 09/09/25. This failure could place residents at risk of feeling that their voices were not being heard or taken seriously and could cause feelings of worthlessness. Findings included:Review of the admission Record dated 09/24/25, revealed Resident #2 was admitted on [DATE] from home. Review of History & Physical dated 08/08/25 revealed Resident #2 was a [AGE] year-old female GAD (severe, ongoing anxiety that interferes with daily activities), bipolar disorder (a mental health condition characterized by extreme shifts in mood, energy, and behavior), DM2 (a chronic metabolic disorder characterized by high blood sugar levels due to insulin deficiency), HTN (is a condition where the force of blood flowing through the arteries is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-01 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures to prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation for 1 of 10 employees (LVN A) reviewed for annual employee misconduct registry and nurse aide registry screenings, in that: The facility had failed to complete the annual employee misconduct registry and annual nurse aide registry screenings for LVN A. This failure could place residents at risk for abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of property. The findings included:Record review of facility's policy undated on Abuse/Neglect revealed the resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation as defined in this subpart. Procedure A. Screening: Criminal History and Background Checks All potential employees will be screened for history of abuse, neglect or mistreating of elderly/individuals as defined the applicable requirement of 483.13 (c) (1) (ii) (A) and (B). Employees will be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-01 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide to send a copy of notice to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman at least 30 days prior to the discharge or as soon as possible for 1 (Resident #2) of two residents reviewed for facility-initiated discharges, in that: The facility failed to send a copy of the Discharge Notice at the same time notice was provided to Resident #2 on 09/03/25 to the Local Office of the State-Long Term Care Ombudsman. This failure could place residents at risk of not providing added protection to residents from being inappropriately transferred or discharged and provide residents with access to an advocate who can inform them of their options and rights. Findings included:Review of the admission Record dated 09/24/25, revealed Resident #2 was admitted on [DATE] from home. Review of History & Physical dated 08/08/25 revealed Resident #2 was a [AGE] year-old female GAD (Severe, ongoing anxiety that interferes with daily activities), bipolar disorder (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that information is comprehensive, timely and properly signed for 1 of 9 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for accuracy and completeness. The facility failed to document when Resident #3 complained of pain to the right lower extremity. This failure could place residents at risk for incomplete or inaccurate clinical records, which could lead to miscommunication, a delay in treatment, or a potential decline in the resident's health. Findings included: Record review of closed admission Record dated 07/31/25 for Resident #3, revealed Original admission Date: 03/07/25; re-admission date 03/21/25. Date of discharge: [DATE] at 12:30 PM to hospital. Review of Hospital Operative Record dated 04/17/25 for Resident #3 revealed, Date of Surgery: 04/17/25. Preoperative diagnosis: Right reverse obliquity intertrochanteric femur fracture (is a break in the upper part of the right thigh bone femur, specifically in the area between the two bony bumps) due to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment and described the services that were to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan regarding information found in a Social Services Quarterly Assessment that no male CNAs should be in Resident #1's room. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not receiving the necessary care or services. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 04/09/2025, revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, medical records were maintained on each resident that were complete and accurately documented for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accuracy and completeness. The facility failed to document an allegation of sexual abuse was made by Resident #1's. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for abuse, neglect, exploitation. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 04/09/2025, revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included: vascular dementia (type of dementia caused by conditions that disrupt blood flow to the brain, leading to cognitive and behavioral changes), hypertension (high blood pressure), hemiplegia (total or partial paralysis of one side of the body that results from disease of or injury to the motor centers of the brain) and hemiparesis (muscle…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-12 · tag F0576 — patternEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation , interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to have reasonable access to the use of a telephone and a place in the facility where calls can be made without being overheard for 3 of 22 (Residents #17, #34 and #40 ) residents reviewed for telephone use. The facility failed to provide a place for Resident #17, #34, and #40 to make telephone calls without privacy or being overheard. This failure could place all residents that use the telephone at risk of conversations being overheard and privacy rights not being respected . The findings included : Record review of Resident #17's admission Record, dated 12/12/24, reflected [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident # 17's Hospital History and Physical dated 03/31/23, revealed diagnoses of dementia without behavioral disturbance, and Alzheimer's disease. Record review of Resident # 17's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 15 demonstrating he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, that include measurable objectives and time frames to meet residents' mental, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 2 of 22 residents (Resident #39, Resident # 33) reviewed for care plans. 1. The facility failed to implement the resident 's care and Resident #39 was not seen by the podiatrist, and her toenails were long . 2. The facility failed to develop a care plan that addressed Resident #33's wandering behavior. This failure could place residents increased risk of being unable to maintain their highest practicable physical well-being. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident # 39's admission Record dated 12/12/2024, reflected [AGE] year-old women who was originally admitted into the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident # 39's Hospital History and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-12 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — patternProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide proper treatment and care to maintain mobility and good foot health in accordance with professional standards of practice, including to prevent complications from the resident's medical conditions and if necessary, assist the resident in making appointments with a qualified person, and arranging for transportation to and from such appointments for 2 of 22 residents (Resident #39, Resident #62) reviewed for foot care. --The facility failed to provide access to podiatrist for Resident #39. -The facility failed to provide access to podiatrist for Resident #62. This failure could place residents at risk of poor foot hygiene and a decline in residents' physical condition. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident # 39's admission Record dated 12/12/2024, reflected [AGE] year-old women who was originally admitted into the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident # 39's Hospital History and Physical,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care is provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 2 (Resident #26 and Resident #39) of 2 residents observed for oxygen management. -The facility failed to keep the oxygen concentrator filter clean for Resident #26. --The facility failed to keep the oxygen concentrator filter clean for Resident #39. These failures could place residents at risk of a significant reduction in the quality of oxygen being delivered, inadequate oxygen support, and decline in health. Findings included: 1. Record Review of Resident #26's admission Record dated 12/12/24, revealed resident is [AGE] year-old male with original admission date into the facility 3/18/2018 and readmitted [DATE]. Record Review of Resident #26 MDS revealed BIMS score of 10, meaning moderate cognitive impairment. MDS revealed medical diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (is a common long-term lung…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident; and failed to have an established system in place for accurate reconciliation of controlled substances for 2 of 4 medication carts that had controlled substances and safe and secure storage of medications for of 2 of 3 medication carts reviewed for medication storage. -The facility failed to ensure Licensed staff signed the Controlled Substance Medication Count Record after counting and verifying that all controlled substances in the medication cart had been accounted for with the on-coming and off-going nurses. -The facility failed to ensure liquid medication stored in medication carts on two halls (200 and 400) did not have dried drippings on the sides of the bottles. - The facility failed to ensure medication carts located in 200 Hall and 400…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services that assured the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing of medications. -The facility failed to ensure opened bottles of Acidophilus Probiotic Dietary Supplement was refrigerated after opening in the 400 Hall medication cart. These failures could place residents at risk for not having their medications available or at decrease efficacy of medications by not following manufacturer's specifications, and cross contamination. The findings included: 400 Hall In an observation on 12/11/24 at 10:34 AM of Medication Aide's medication cart on the 4th floor with LVN B, revealed bottle of Acidophilus Probiotic Dietary Supplement was dated as opened on 11/03/24. LVN B confirmed the manufacturer's label on the bottle said to Refrigerate after opening. LVN B immediately removed the medication bottle from the medication cart.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation and food storage -The facility failed to store foods in the refrigerator in sealed containers. -The facility failed to keep 1 of 23 spice bottles stored on metal storage rack completely sealed. The facility failed to keep the kitchen ceiling tiles free of dried brown water stains throughout kitchen. -The facility failed to keep ceiling vents free of lint that were directly above food preparation area. - The facility failed to replace missing ceiling tiles in room between the kitchen and Dishwashing Room and in the Dry Storage Room. - The facility failed to maintain Vegetable sink in operational condition. -The facility failed to follow the Three-Compartment Sink Procedures that specified procedure to sanitize pots and pans. -The facility failed to maintain a working trash can next to the hand washing sink in the kitchen. These failures could affect…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections during laundry room observation, and 1 of 1 treatment cart observed for Infection Control. -The facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene when passing out food trays. -The facility failed to ensure opened packages of gauze non-sterile sponges were stored in sealed plastic bags. -The facility failed to ensure facility staff did not store personal belongings on a clean linen table shelf. These failures could place residents at risk for cross contamination and the spread of infection. Findings included: Hand Hygiene: In an observation on 12/09/24 at 12:48 PM LVN D was observed distributing meal trays, after distributing four meal trays LVN D repositioned a resident in her wheelchair and then continued to pass out meal trays to other residents. LVN D did not perform any hand hygiene after…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-12 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public for 3 of 3 facility floors reviewed for environment and 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for safe operating equipment. -Resident rooms had loose closet doors in need of repair. This failure could affect residents, placing them at risk of living in an unsafe, uncomfortable environment and decreased quality of life due to poor conditions of the facility interior and exterior; and potential for injury to residents and staff by not maintaining essential equipment in safe operating condition. Findings includes: 1. Observation on 12/09/24 at 9:54 AM during initial rounds revealed: -Rooms 219, 417 and 428 did not have sliding closet doors. -rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] closet doors were off the double track and did not have the Sliding Closet Door Bottom Guide to keep the closet doors in place when opened. -room [ROOM NUMBER], 210, 214, 217, 218, 226 and 418:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure residents the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for 1 resident (Resident #41) of 22 residents reviewed for call light placement. -The facility failed to ensure that Residents #41 call lights were within their reach on 12/09/2024. This failure places the resident at risk of not being able to call for assistance when needed. Findings included: Record Review of Resident #41's admission Record dated 12/10/24, revealed [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE]. Record review of Resident # 41's Hospital History and Physical dated 10/02/24, revealed diagnoses: Parkinson's disease with dyskinesia (Parkinson's disease is a movement disorder of the nervous system), cerebellar ataxia (Cerebellar ataxia is a condition characterized by poor muscle control that affects walking, balance, hand coordination, speech,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents had the right to be treated with respect and dignity and to be cared for in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, for 1 (Resident #8) of 11 residents reviewed for being treated with dignity and respect. The facility failed to ensure that an unidentified nurse staff did not enter Resident #8's room at an unidentified time and date without permission after knocking, leaving him without time to put on clothing. This failure put residents at risk of embarrassment, decreased self-esteem, and loss of a sense of independence and control. Findings included: Record review of Resident #8's face sheet dated 04/03/2024 revealed he was [AGE] years old and was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #8's History and Physical dated 07/29/2023 revealed he had diabetes, multiple amputations to his right foot, and was being treated for a non-healing wound. Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-04 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents had the right to receive unopened mail and other letters, packages and other materials delivered to the facility for the resident for one (Resident #8) of 11 residents reviewed for receiving unopened mail and other materials delivered to the facility for the resident. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #8 received an unopened personal correspondence. This failure places residents at risk of violations of their right to privacy due to their letters and packages being opened before they are delivered to the resident. Findings included: Record review of Resident #8's face sheet dated 04/03/2024 revealed he was [AGE] years old and was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #8's History and Physical dated 07/29/2023 revealed he had diabetes, multiple amputations to his right foot, and was being treated for a non-healing wound. Record review of Resident #8's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse when an altercation occurred on 2/26/24 between two residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of 11 reviewed for implementation of policies that prevent abuse. 1. The facility failed to investigate an altercation on 2/26/2024 at 9:29 AM between Resident #1 and #2. 2. The facility failed to protect Resident #1 from Resident #2 resulting in a resident-to-resident physical altercation on 02/26/2024 at 1:00 PM. This failure puts residents at risk of physical altercations that could result in injury. Findings included: Record review of the facility form 3613-A dated regarding an incident on 02/26/2024 at 1:00 PM revealed that it involved Resident #1 and Resident #2. Per the report Resident #2 made contact with Resident #1's left cheek when he became agitated that he was talking to Resident #1 and Resident #1 was ignoring him. The report stated that Resident #1 and Resident #2 were seated next to each other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to implement written policies that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents for two residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of 11 reviewed for implementation of policies that prevent abuse. 1. The facility failed to investigate altercation on 2/26/2024 at 9:29 AM between Resident #1 and #2. 2. The facility failed to protect Resident #1 from Resident #2 resulting in a resident-to-resident physical altercation on 02/26/2024 at 1:00 PM. This failure puts residents at risk of physical altercations that could result in injury. Findings included: Record review of the facility Abuse/Neglect revised 03/29/2018 revealed that the resident has the right to be free from abuse. Residents should not be subjected to abuse from anyone, including other residents. The facility will provide and ensure the protection of resident rights. It is each individual's responsibility to recognize and report actual or alleged abuse and situations…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse are reported immediately, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials for two residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of 11 reviewed for implementation of policies that prevent abuse. LVN C failed to report an alterction between Resident #1 and #2 that took place the morning of 02/23/2024 to the Administrator. This failure puts residents at risk of physical altercations that could result in injury. Findings included: Record review of the facility form 3613-A dated regarding an incident on 02/26/2024 at 1:00 PM revealed that it involved Resident #1 and Resident #2. Per the report Resident #2 made contact with Resident #1's left cheek when he became agitated that he was talking to Resident #1 and Resident #1 was ignoring him. The report stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-04 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who displays or was diagnosed with dementia, receives the appropriate treatment and services to attain or maintain his or her highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for one resident (Resident #1) of 3 reviewed for appropriate treatment and services to attain or maintain their highest practicable well-being. 1. The facility failed to track resident's ongoing wandering behaviors which placed him at risk of not having these behaviors identified and addressed. 2. The facility failed to identify and establish a care plan to address Resident #1's wandering behavior which placed him at risk of verbal and physical abuse from other residents. This failure puts residents with dementia at increased risk of not having their dementia-related needs met. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet dated 03/21/2024 revealed he was [AGE] years old and was admitted to the facility on [DATE].…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-17 · tag F0644 — patternCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) program for 4 (Resident #22, Resident #30, Resident #11 and Resident #237) of 23 residents reviewed for PASARR coordination. -The facility failed to ensure that Resident #22 ' s PASARR status was reviewed when he was given a new psychiatric diagnosis and prescribed antipsychotic medication -The facility failed to ensure that Resident #30 ' s PASARR status was reviewed when he received a new diagnosis and began receiving psychological services -The facility failed to submit a request for specialized services for Resident #11 in order for him to continue his therapy. -The facility failed to submit a request for initial specialized services for Resident #237. This failure could result in residents not receiving specialized services to address their unique needs. Findings included: Resident #22 Record review of Resident #22 ' s face sheet dated 11/16/2023 revealed he was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident medical and nursing needs to be furnished to attain or maintain the residents highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 2 of 27 residents (Resident #13 and Resident #237) reviewed for care plans in that: - The facility failed to include Resident #13 ' s smoking on his care plan. - The facility failed to include in Resident #237 ' s comprehensive care plan that he was PASSAR positive (had mental illness diagnosis and/or intellectual/developmental disability qualifying him for specialized PASSAR Services). This deficient practice could place residents in the facility at risk of not receiving the necessary care or services and not having personalized plans developed to address their needs. Findings include: Resident #13 Record review of Resident #13 ' s face sheet revealed he was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of 1 resident (Resident #62) of 4 reviewed for medication orders. The facility failed to re-order pain medication for Resident # 62 after the blister pack had been completed. The facility failed to remove insulin from medication on the second floor for a resident that was moved to the third floor on 10/12/23. The facility failed to remove medications from medication carts when residents were discharged to the hospital. This deficient practice could result in a decline in health if medication was not ordered for residents when needed. Findings included: Resident #62 Record review of Resident #62 ' s face sheet dated 11/17/2023 revealed a [AGE] year-old male with an admission date to the facility of 12/12/2022. Record review of Resident #62 ' s undated electronic diagnosis list…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biological were stored in locked storage area and to limit access to authorized personnel for 3 of 3 rooms reviewed for medication storage. -The facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked storage area and limited access to authorized personnel. -The facility failed to permanently attach metal box containing controlled substances to the refrigerator rack for 2 of 3 medication refrigerators. The facility's failure could place residents at risk for not receiving prescribed medications as ordered and risk for drug diversion. Findings included: Observation and interview on 11/14/23 at 10:30 AM with LVN J revealed facility did not have designated medication room on any of the floors. The nurse stated there was a room behind the nurse's station on each floor where they kept a locked cabinet to store discontinued medications, OTC (over the counter medications) floor stock, extra medication blister packets, and a locked medication refrigerator to store medications…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation and food storage. -The facility failed to keep floor in the dry storage room free of black grease built up. -The facility failed to keep wall in the dry storage room free of Scraped paint. -The facility failed to keep bottles of vinegar stored on metal storage racks in the dry storage room free of white powder residual on caps. -The facility failed to keep floor in the dry storage room clean, and free of food and paper particles. -The facility failed to keep refrigerator storage racks free of rust. -The facility failed to store foods in refrigerator in sealed containers; food containers had dried food drippings around the caps and dried brown stains on side of food container. -The facility failed to keep large skillets stored on metal racks free of black burnt grease built up on the sides and bottoms of pans. The facility failed to store foods in dry…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection in 1 of 3 (2nd floor) dining rooms and for 2 of 27 residents (Resident #16 and Resident #57) reviewed for infection control. -The facility failed to ensure staff followed infection control practices when passing out meal trays during dining service. -The facility failed to ensure that Resident #57 ' s catheter tubing did not drag on the floor. -The facility failed to ensure LVN I washed her hands and put on gloves prior to checking for G-Tube Placement. These deficient practices could place residents at risk for infection due to improper care practices. Findings included: Observation on 11/14/23 at 12:34 PM of the second-floor dining room revealed CNA D was observed taking a meal tray from the food cart and passed it out to a resident.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-17 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on Observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain essential equipment in safe operating condition for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for safe operating equipment. The oven thermostats did not properly set the temperature in the four ovens. Vegetable sink has not been operable in over 3 months. These failures could place residents at risk of foodborne illnesses and injury. Findings included: An initial tour of the kitchen on 11/14/23 started at 8:14 AM, revealed oven thermostats were not working. There was a sign posted above the Vegetable sink that stated it was out of service. Observation and interview on 11/14/23 at 8:36 AM with [NAME] and Dietary Director revealed that 4 of 4 ovens were not working properly. [NAME] reported they had been having problems with oven temperatures for several months. He demonstrated to the surveyors; oven thermostats did not work. The [NAME] said, The oven will not heat up to the temperature set with the thermostat. Sometimes the oven temperatures are too cold or too hot. Maintenance staff had attempted to fix the problem.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-17 · tag F0551 — isolatedGive the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, that facility failed to extend to the resident representative ' s the right to make decisions on behalf of the resident for 1 of 8 (Resident #10) residents reviewed for resident rights in that: The facility failed to respect Resident #10 ' s Next of Kin ' s decisions regarding refusing DNR and attempted to seek legal guardianship to obtain DNR consents. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving services without their or their representative ' s consent. Findings include: Record review of Resident #10 ' s face sheet dated 11/17/2023 revealed an [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions) and dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning — thinking, remembering, and reasoning — to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities). Record review of Resident #10 ' s…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the prompt resolution of all grievances to include ensuring that all written grievance decisions include the date the grievance was received, a summary statement of the resident ' s grievance, the steps taken to investigate the grievance, a summary of the pertinent findings or conclusions regarding the resident ' s concerns, a statement as to whether the grievance was confirmed or not confirmed, any corrective action taken or to be taken by the facility as a result of the grievance, and the date the written decision was issued for 1 of 8 (Resident # 44) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure an investigation was initiated promptly for Resident #44 ' s grievance of missing money and debit card. This failure could place residents at risk for grievances not being addressed or resolved promptly in turn leading to resident ' s lost properties not being replaced. Findings include: Record review of Resident #44 ' s face sheet dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source, are reported immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the event, if the events result in serious bodily injury, or no later than 24 hours if the events do not result in serious bodily injury, to the Administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency) in accordance with state law through established procedures for 1 of 8 (Resident # 44) reviewed for misappropriation of property. The facility failed to report an allegation of misappropriation of property (money, old coin and debit card) to the State Survey Agency within 24 hours of being made by Resident #44. This failure could place residents at risk of allegations of abuse, neglect, misappropriation of property not fully investigated and emotional distress. Findings include: Record review of Resident #44 ' s face sheet dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-17 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident ' s status for 2 (Residents #7 and #22) of 23 residents reviewed for accuracy of MDS assessments. - The facility failed to ensure that Resident #7 ' s MDS accurately reflected her refusal of care. - The facility failed to ensure that Resident #22 ' s MDS accurately reflected use of restraints. These failures could put residents at risk of not having their need for help with removal of facial hair or the use of bedrails assessed accurately . Findings included: Resident #7 Record review of Resident #7 ' s face sheet dated 11/17/2023 revealed she was an [AGE] year-old female, was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #7 ' s History and Physical dated 03/31/2023 revealed she had dementia without behavioral disturbance, and fracture of the right femur (broken right thigh bone). She was alert and oriented times one (knew her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents are unable to carry out activities of daily living receive the necessary services to maintain good grooming for 1 (Resident #7) of 23 residents reviewed for quality of life. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #7 did not have facial hair on her chin and upper lip. This failure put residents at risk of embarrassment and a negative self-image. Findings included: Resident #7 Record review of Resident #7's face sheet dated 11/17/2023 revealed she was an [AGE] year-old female, was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #7's History and Physical dated 03/31/2023 revealed she had dementia without behavioral disturbance, and fracture of the right femur (broken right thigh bone). She was alert and oriented times one (knew her name) and was confused and agitated. Record review of Resident #7's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed her BIMS score was 6…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-17 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who are continent of bladder receives services and assistance to maintain continence for one (Residents # 19) of 23 residents reviewed for bladder incontinence. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #19 ' s oxygen tubing was long enough for her to walk to the bathroom, resulting in increased instances of urinary incontinence. This failure put residents at increased risk of urinary tract infections, urinary incontinence, embarrassment, and a negative self-image. Findings included: Resident #19 Record review of Resident #19 ' s face sheet dated 11/16/2023 revealed she was [AGE] years old, was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #19 ' s History and Physical dated 03/31/2023 revealed she had diagnoses including congestive heart failure, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (a condition where lungs cannot provide enough oxygen to the blood), respiratory…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents who need respiratory care are provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 3 (Residents #4, #19, and #22) of 9 Residents reviewed for oxygen usage. The facility failed to ensure that Residents #4, #19, and #22 ' s oxygen concentrators had clean filters. This failure could put residents at increased risk of breathing in dust and allergens and of decreased effectiveness of oxygen concentrators. Findings include: Resident #4 Record review of Resident #4 ' s face sheet dated 11/16/2023 revealed she was [AGE] years old, was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #4 ' s History and Physical dated 03/13/2023 revealed she had diagnoses including hypoxemia (low levels of oxygen in the blood). Supplemental oxygen was to be given as needed via nasal cannula (a thin plastic tube with two prongs for insertion into the nose). Record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-17 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from any physical restraints that are not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms for 1 (Resident #22) of 23 residents reviewed for restraints. The facility failed to ensure Resident #22 had an evaluation, consent, and correct orders for the bed rails that were on his bed. This failure put residents at risk of unnecessary restraints on their movement. Findings included: Resident #22 Record review of Resident #22 ' s face sheet dated 11/16/2023 revealed he was [AGE] years old, was initially admitted to the facility 04/09/2018 and readmitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #22 ' s History and Physical dated 08/31/2023 revealed he had a history of paraplegia (paralysis of the whole body) and was bed bound. Record review of Resident #22 ' s quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed his BIMS score was 11 (moderate cognitive impairment). He had no symptomatic behaviors. He was dependent on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2026-03-12 · tag F0577 — patternAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure the residents had the right to examine the results of the most recent survey of the facility and the facility failed to post the results of the most recent survey in a place that is readily accessible to residents, family members, legal representatives of residents, and the public for 1 of 1 survey results binder reviewed.The facility failed to ensure the annual survey results binder was accessible for residents, family members, and staff on 03/11/2026This failure placed residents, family members, and legal representatives of the residents at risk of not being informed the facility's survey and investigation results.Findings included:During an observation conducted on 03/11/2026 from 11:27 AM to 11:55 AM the annual survey results binder was not locatable in an easily accessible area on the ground floor, 2nd floor, and 3rd floor. At 11:56 AM it was observed The Administrator was placing the annual survey results binder in the receptionist desk area.During an interview on 03/11/2026 at 11:57 AM with the Administrator,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$76,770 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $24,542 — penalty dated 2025-04-11
- $52,228 — penalty dated 2024-03-05
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-03-22 for 39 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CREATIVE SOLUTIONS IN HEALTHCARE — 149 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.7 | -1.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.2 | +0.8 vs chain |
The other 148 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 148; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| BOWERS, SEAN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 07/01/2024 |
| CISNEROS, ALFRED | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 02/18/2008 |
| COBB, TRAVIS | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 10/05/2022 |
| COOPER, STEPHEN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 11/11/2022 |
| HARDIN, SHERRIE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 09/04/2024 |
| KERZEE, RICHARD | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 09/24/2007 |
| KORENEK, PATRICIA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 05/05/2018 |
| SOECHTING, PAUL | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 11/22/2024 |
| STRACK, JOE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 02/11/2022 |
| HUGGINS, LINDA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 12/01/2023 |
| WILLIG, ZACHARY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2025 |
| THOMPSON, JOHNNY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/01/2024 |
| EL PASO X ENTERPRISES, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/08/2025 |
| BLAKE, GARY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2024 |
| BLAKE, MALISA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 09/01/2022 |
| AHMED, FAROOQUE | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2025 |
| MORA, LISA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/15/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $198K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675106. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.