No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Navasota Nursing & Rehabilitation

1405 E Washington, Navasota, TX 77868 · For profit - Corporation · 172 certified beds · (936) 825-6463 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0609) — most recent Dec 2025Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0744)5 immediate-jeopardy citations1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$105,594 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0609) — most recent Dec 2025
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • inspectors cited 5 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $105,594 in federal fines (most recent 2025-09-18)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
501 E Washington Ave · (936) 825-6444 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1712 E Washington Ave · (936) 825-2185 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1401 E Washington Ave · (936) 825-7161 · Call to confirm hours
Park
900 Kettler St · (936) 825-6475 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1530 E Washington Ave · (936) 825-6851

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased26.0%15.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.7%3.0%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.8%0.8%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.0%2.4%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.3%3.3%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened29.1%14.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication13.0%18.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.1%3.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control14.5%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table19.4%9.6%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.3%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.3%88.0%79.4%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.112.171.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days4.432.061.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.20U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.06hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 23% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.071.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.27
RN hours/ resident / day
0.69
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.53
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.49
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.20
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 172 beds and averages 65.8 residents a day — about 38% occupied, or roughly 106 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.49 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.27 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.53 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.67 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.31 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-05)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-09)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

48 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-09-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received care and services consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent pressure ulcers and did not develop pressure ulcers unless the individual's clinical condition demonstrated that they were unavoidable for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility failed to:A. Ensure Resident #1 had appropriate interventions in place to prevent unstageable pressure ulcers under her C- Collar neck brace.B. Perform thorough skin assessments under Resident #1's C-collar to ensure pressure ulcers were not developing.C. Ensure Resident #1's C-collar was applied properly and maintained, as it was noted to be taped in place to prevent removal, with fecal matter smeared on tape.These failures resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation on 09/17/2025. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 1:01PM. While the IJ was removed on 09/18/2025, the facility remained out of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-08-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible and ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility failed to ensure CNA A, on 07/30/25, did not transfer Resident #1 from his bed to a shower chair without using two people and a mechanical lift. Resident #1 fell and suffered pain to his right ankle and behind his right knee. The noncompliance was identified as Past Noncompliance. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) began on 07/30/25 and ended on 07/30/25. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began.This deficient practice placed residents at risk of pain, injury, and hospitalization. Findings included:Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 08/08/25 reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents receive care consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers unless the individual's clinical condition demonstrates that they were unavoidable; and once developed, failed to ensure necessary treatment and services to promote healing for one (Resident #21) of six residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility failed to ensure Resident #21 who was at risk for skin breakdown was turned every two hours and provided incontinent care. on 05/07/2024, Resident #21 was left in the same position in her Geri-chair (specialized recliners that are upholstered in non-permeable, easily sanitized vinyl.) for 6 and a half hours from 8:00 AM till 2:30 PM. Once Resident #21 was placed in bed she was observed to have two DTIs (A pressure-related injury to subcutaneous tissues under intact skin.) to her coccyx that were previously unidentified by the facility. An immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for 2 of 14 residents (Residents #1 and 2) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure TLVN and LVN C assessed and reported a new new skin injury to Resident #1's first two toes of the right foot and a new skin injury to Resident #'s first and fifth toes of the right foot. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 03/06/24. While the IJ was removed on 03/08/24 at 03:00 PM., the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated with the potential for more than minimal harm, due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. This failure placed residents at risk of new or worsening pressure ulcers. Findings included: 1. Review of the undated face sheet for Resident #1 reflected an [AGE] year-old…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-01-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement written policies and procedures that ensured reporting of crimes in federally funded long-term care facilities in accordance with section 1150B of the Act, any incident that involved an emergency situation that posed a threat to resident health and safety immediately, but not later than 24 hours after the incident occurs or is suspected. The facility failed to: 1. The facility failed to report to State Survey Agency (HHSC), immediately, but not later than 24 hours, when, on [DATE], two employees witnessed another employee with a gun in the facility. 2. The facility failed to follow their own procedures when a verbal altercation between employees occurred, and, on [DATE], one of the employees involved in the verbal altercation brought a handgun into the facility, and the incident was not immediately reported to the administrator or the DON. 3. The facility failed to call the police and to follow its own facility protocol for an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2023-12-07 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment for one (Resident #1) out of three residents reviewed for advanced directives, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's DNR was signed by the MD until [DATE] when it was ready to be signed on [DATE]. Resident #1's DNR was not uploaded into the EHR, resulting in LVN A having an incomplete OOH-DNR form with which to make her determination of whether to begin CPR. This failure also resulted in Resident #1's Care Plan reflecting a now incorrect code status at the time Resident #1 became unresponsive. These failures resulted in LVN A performing CPR for 5 minutes, and in 911 being called, who continued CPR for an additional 30 minutes, intubated Resident #1 and transported Resident #1 to the hospital. An IJ was identified on [DATE]. The IJ Template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 06:00PM. While the POR was accepted on [DATE] at 1:40 PM and the immediacy was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with State and Federal laws, all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to 1 of 3 medication carts (Medication Cart #1) reviewed for drug storage and labeling.The facility failed to ensure Medication Cart #1, was locked, medications secured, and not accessible to other staff, residents, or visitors and was left unlocked by RN A two times at 6:49 a.m. and 7:30 a.m. on 06/23/2026.This failure could place residents at risk of having unauthorized access to medications, decreased effectiveness of medication, or missing medications. Findings include: Observation of Station 3 hall Nurses Station on 06/23/2026 at 6:49 a.m., revealed Medication Cart #1 was facing toward the hall area near the nurses' station. There were not any staff in the hall or near the nurse's station. RN A exited a room approximately 6:55 a.m. on 300 hall and walked toward the nurse's station to the unlocked medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received care and services, consistent with professional standards of practice to maintain skin integrity to prevent the development of pressure ulcers and other skin conditions for three (Resident #1, Resident #3 and Resident #4) of four residents reviewed for skin integrity. The facility failed to consistently complete, and documents required skin checks weekly for three residents (Resident #1, Resident #3 and Resident #4).This failure put residents at risk for undetected skin issues, worsening skin issues and decreased quality of life.Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet shows an admission to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include Alzheimer's Disease, protein calorie malnutrition, anemia, depression, insomnia, and cerebral infarction. Review of Resident #1's Minimum Data Set Assessment and Care Screening dated 3-26-2026 Resident #1 requires maximum assistance of the helper to roll left to right, for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident was treated with respect, dignity and care for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #2) observed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's door was closed when provided with personal care on 5/5/2026.This failure could place residents at risk of feeling embarrassed, loss of dignity and decrease in quality of life.Findings included:Review of Resident 2's Face sheet dated 05/05/2026 reflected an admission date of 12/23/2025 with diagnoses of unspecified dementia (cognitive decline,) monoclonal gammopathy (blood disorder where cells produce abnormal; proteins) and end stage renal disease (final irreversible stage of kidney failure). Review of Resident 2's MDS assessment, dated 03/27/2026, reflected Resident #2 had a BIMS score of 11 out of 15, indicating moderative cognitive impairment. Review of Resident 2's comprehensive care plan on 05/05/2026, reflected resident has an ADL Self Care Performance Deficit related to impaired cognition and debility.Observation on 5/05/2026 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that the call light system was adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area from residents room for 1 of 6 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for resident call system. The facility failed to ensure the call light system in Resident #1's room was functioning on 05/05/2026. This failure could place residents at risk of harm by not being able to call for help when needed and at risk of not receiving the care and services to maintain their highest level of well-being.Findings included: Review of Resident 1's Face sheet dated 05/05/2026 reflected an admission date of 12/13/2024 with diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease (progressive irreversible brain disorder affecting memory, thinking, behavior), anemia (deficiency of healthy red blood cells) and depression (sadness in mood, loss of interest).Review of Resident 1's MDS assessment, dated 03/26/2026, reflected Resident #1 had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed ensure the comprehensive care plan, consistent with resident rights, included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for one of five residents (Resident #1) reviewed for care plans completion. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's care plan was completed to reflect Resident #1 was lying on a mattress located on the floor and was crawling on the floor toward his roommate's bed. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving appropriate interventions to meet their medical and safety needs. Findings include:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 03/04/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with a diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease with late onset ( a progressive brain disorder characterized by memory loss, confusion often influenced by a mix of genetics, environmental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-12 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing activity program to support residents in their choice of activities, both facility sponsored group and individual activities, and independent activities, designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, encouraging both independence and interaction in the community for 3 of 59 residents reviewed for activities. The facility failed to provide activities for all residents in the facility for the entire months of August 2025 and September 2025. This failure could place residents at risks of boredom, depression, behavior, diminished quality of life and decreased cognitive function. Findings included:Record review of the activity participation record binder for the year of 2025 reflected there were not any participation records for the months of August 2025 and September of 2025. Record review of the QAPI, dated 12/08/2025, reflected the Activity Director and Activity…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-12 · tag F0742 — pattern
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review , the facility failed to ensure a resident who was diagnosed with a mental illness or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who had a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder, received appropriate treatment and services to correct the assessed problem or to attain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being for four (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3 ) of five resident reviewed for behavioral health.The facility failed to ensure Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3 received appropriate psychiatric services. This failure could place residents at risk because their mental and psychosocial needs not being met and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet, dated 12/12/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of anxiety disorder ( involves repeated episodes of sudden feelings of intense anxiety and fear or terror that reach a peak within minutes with panic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents had the right to be free from abuse and neglect for two (Resident #2 and Resident #5) of four residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility failed to protect Resident #2 from physical abuse by Resident #5.This failure placed residents at risk of abuse, neglect, trauma, and psychosocial harm.Findings included: 1.Review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated 12/12/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of major depressive disorder ( a mental condition characterized by a persistently depressed mood and long-term loss of pleasure or interest in life, often with other symptoms such as disturbed sleep or feelings of guilt), diarrhea, unspecified (a condition in which feces are discharged from the bowels frequently and in a liquid form), other depressive disorder, recurrent without psychotic features (someone having repeated, severe depression episodes but without delusions, meaning…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment remained as free of accidents and hazards as possible for 1 of 3 shower rooms reviewed for accidents and supervision.The facility failed to ensure the shower door located on Mc [NAME] Hall was closed and locked.This failure could place residents at risk of injuries, illness, and hospitalization. Findings included:Observation on 12/12/2025 at 10:15 a.m. revealed the shower room door on [NAME] Hallway was left opened and propped open 1 time. Observation revealed no staff or residents in the hallway or near the shower room. In the shower room there was no-rinse scented spray cleanser, shampoo and body wash, and shaving cream located on top of the clothes barrel.Interview on 12/12/2025 at 10: 20 a.m. CNA A stated he unlocked the shower room door and closed it when he exited the shower room to assist a resident to the shower room. He stated the door was closed when he left it unlocked. He stated he knew not to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medications and biologicals were stored in locked compartments for one of three ([NAME] Hall) medication carts reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to ensure [NAME] Hall medication cart was locked and medications were secure and not accessible to other staff, resident, or visitors. This failure could place residents at risk of having unauthorized access to prescription, biologicals, and over-the-counter medications. Findings included: Observation on 07/01/2025 at 8:35 AM revealed an unlocked medication cart 1 across from station one nurses station and near the entrance to [NAME] hallway. The back of the cart was against the wall with the drawers facing the nurse's station. The locking mechanism was protruding outward on the medication cart. The state surveyor opened the drawers and captured photos. The nursing staff or any staff was not near the nurse's station or the unlocked medication cart. Observation on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 32 citations
  • Potential for harm · F2025-06-05 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to voice grievances to the facility or other agency or entity that hears grievances without discrimination or reprisal and without fear of discrimination or reprisal for five of six residents (confidential residents) reviewed for grievances. The facility failed to post the grievance procedure in a prominent and accessible locations throughout the facility; provide residents with access to grievance forms, and instruction on how to file an anonymous grievance. This failure could place residents at risk by limiting their access to the grievance process, which may result on unresolved concerns that impact their well-being and overall quality of care. Findings include: Observation on June 4, 2025, at 10:38 AM, revealed the facility's grievance procedure posted in the first hallway near the front entrance. The notice was affixed approximately nine feet above the floor, which made it difficult to read. The height rendered it inaccessible to residents who use wheelchairs or those who…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene for 3 of 11 residents (Residents # 11, #17, and #32) reviewed for ADLS . 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #11's fingernails were cleaned, trimmed and filed. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #17 received baths per her care plan and her request and failed to ensure her nails were trimmed. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #32 had clean clothing, failed to ensure she received baths three times a week and failed to ensure her nails were trimmed and filed. These failures could place residents at risk for a decline in health, skin breakdown, loss of self-esteem, a diminished quality of life and health-related issues from lack of hygiene . Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #11's, undated, face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure, based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, the resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for one of six residents (Resident #39) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to take vital signs daily for 58 of the last 68 days per the QAPI initiated physician orders for Resident #39. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving necessary medical care and lead to an unacknowledged change in condition and possible hospitalization. Findings include : Record review of Resident #39's face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old, female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #39 had diagnoses which included, Dementia, severe with agitation (damage or loss of nerve cells in the brain resulting in behavior changes), Essential Hypertension (high blood pressure), and Generalized Anxiety…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with the professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. The facility failed to ensure a hair net was worn by Dietary Aide . These failures could place residents who ate food served by the kitchen at risk of food-borne illness. Findings included: An observation on 06/04/2025 at 10:49 AM, a Dietary Aide was observed in the kitchen prepping dessert and washing dishes without a hair restraint on. In an interview on 06/05/2025 at 9:08AM with Dietary Aide , she stated she had worked in the kitchen for 1 year and she knew a hair net should be always on. She stated she found a hair net on the floor in the kitchen but did not realize her hair net had fallen off. She stated she was trained by a previous Dietary Manager to always wear a hair net and she also had her food handler certificate . She stated some consequences for not wearing a hair net could be food getting into the food and causing contamination . In…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals for one of two medication carts (RN medication cart) reviewed for medication safety. The facility failed to ensure that a loose Tramadol pill (controlled medication) in RN Medication Cart was secured, administered, and/or disposed of based on facility policy. The failure puts residents at risk for not receiving their prescribed medication and risk of possible drug diversion. Findings include: Observation of the RN Medication Cart for Station II and III on 6/4/2025 at 03:10 PM with RN A revealed one loose pill on the bottom of the drawer within the locked drawers of the medication cart. It was a small, white circular pill AN 627. Medication identified by RN A as Tramadol 50 mg. The medication was put into a cup and taken to the RCN and DON. The RCN and Traveling DON were notified of the loose medication in the cart. The RCN and Traveling DON stated that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide or obtain from an outside source dental service to meet the needs of 1 of 4 residents (Resident #33) reviewed for dental services. The facility did not assist Resident #33, who had missing teeth and pain when she ate , with a dental service consult. This failure could place residents at risk of oral complications, pain, difficulty eating, and diminished quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #33's face sheet showed a 69 -year-old woman, who was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included: Parkinson's disease (neurodegenerative disorder that affects movement), Protein - calorie malnutrition (inadequate intake of food (as a source of protein, calories, and other essential nutrients). Rhabdomyolysis (muscle tissue break down ). Record Review of Resident #33 's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] , reflected a BIMS score of 10 which indicted moderately impaired cogntition. MDS section L- Oral / dental status…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections and follow accepted national standards for one of six residents reviewed for infection control practices. (Resident #52). The facility failed to ensure that LVN B used gloves to open a capsule prior to medication administration on 6/4/2025. This failure could place the resident at risk for cross contamination. Findings include: Review of Resident #52's Face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old, female admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Dementia, severe with other behavioral disturbance, Essential Hypertension (high blood pressure), and Cognitive Communication Deficit (problem with communication caused by cognition rather than a language or speech deficit). Review of the MDS assessment for Resident #52 dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-23 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide services by sufficient numbers of nurse aides and licensed nurses on a 24-hour basis to provide nursing care to all residents in accordance with resident care plans for 6 of 8 shifts (04/19/25 06:00 AM-06:00 PM, 04/19/25 06:00 PM-06:00 AM, 04/20/25 06:00 AM-06:00 PM, 04/20/25 06:00 PM-06:00 AM , 04/21/25 06:00 AM-06:00 PM , and 04/22/25 06:00 AM-06:00 PM) reviewed for sufficient nurse staffing. The facility failed to schedule nurse aides and licensed nurses in numbers consistent with the posted nurse staffing during the following shifts: 04/19/25 06:00 AM-06:00 PM, 04/19/25 06:00 PM-06:00 AM, 04/20/25 06:00 AM-06:00 PM, 04/20/25 06:00 PM-06:00 AM , 04/21/25 06:00 AM-06:00 PM , and 04/22/25 06:00 AM-06:00 PM. This failure placed residents at risk of not having their needs for assistance with activities of daily living and their medical needs met. Findings included: Review of the posted nurse staffing for 04/20/25, 04/21/25, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-30 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received services in the facility with reasonable accommodations of each resident's needs for 3 of 6 residents (Residents #1, #2, & #3) reviewed for resident rights in that: Residents #1, #2, & #3 's call lights was not within reach on 01/30/2025. This failure could affect residents who needed assistance with activities of daily living and could result in needs not being met. Findings included: 1.Record review of Resident #1's admission record dated 01/30/2025, revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease (a brain disorder that causes memory and thinking skills to decline over time. Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 01/22/2025, revealed the resident had a BIMS score of 03, which indicated severe impairment. The MDS also revealed Resident #1 was dependent in the areas of toileting hygiene, shower/bathe self, lower…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. Resident #3's comprehensive care plan did not reflect Resident #3's received psych service. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for not receiving proper care and services due to inaccurate care plans. Findings include: A record review of Resident #3's face sheet dated 01/30/2025, reflected an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #3's diagnoses included: unspecified dementia (a condition that cause a decline in thinking, memory, and reasoning abilities), major depressive disorder (mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4's care plan was updated to reflect the resident's recent falls on 12/20/2024, 01/24/2025 & 01/25/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving appropriate care to meet their current needs. Findings include: Record review of a facility face sheet for Resident #4 dated 01/30/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #4's diagnoses included: unspecified dementia ((a condition that cause a decline in thinking, memory, and reasoning abilities), repeated falls (falling multiple times, usually within a short period), lack of coordination (not being able to move different parts of your body smoothly together), and muscle weakness (when your muscles don't have the strength…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to immediately inform the resident, consult with the resident's physician and notify, consistent with his or her authority, the representative when there was a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status for one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's MD was notified after she experienced swelling in her left arm. Resident #1 complained of pain 11/16/2024, the Medical Doctor was not informed. On 11/20/2024 the Medical Doctor assessed the resident and ordered an X-ray which showed no significant findings on 11/21/2024 of which the MD was not notified. On 11/26/2024 the resident requested to go to the emergency room where she was diagnosed with a ruptured left bicep tendon with instructions to keep arm elevated and free of compression. This failure could place residents at risk of illness, injury, uncontrolled pain, and a decreased quality of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were trauma survivors received culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice, and accounted for residents' experiences and preferences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization for 1 (Resident #1) of 1 resident reviewed for trauma informed care. The facility had Resident #1 in a shared room with Resident #2, when his care planning for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) documented that having roommates triggers his PTSD. This failure could place residents at increased risk for psychological distress due to re-traumatization. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's Face Sheet dated 07/17/2024 reflected a [AGE] year-old male initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: chronic / acute post-traumatic stress disorder (mental health condition that can affect anyone who has experienced a traumatic event,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-09 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide a private space for residents' monthly resident council meetings and the confidential resident group meeting during survey for five of five confidential residents reviewed for resident council. The facility did not provide a private space for resident council meetings. The failure could place residents, who attended resident council meetings, at risk of not being able to exercise their rights of being able to voice their grievances in a private space without uninvited staff being present. Findings Included: Interview on 05/07/2024 10:10 AM, the Administrator stated the residents would be in the dining area that it was located next to the nurses' station which was an open room with no doors for privacy. After speaking with the administrator, the meeting was then moved to the Activity Directors office. A confidential resident group meeting held in the Activity Director's office on -05/08/224 at 10:30 AM with 5 residents. The residents in attendance of the resident group meeting stated they normally meet in the dining…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 5 of 10 residents (Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #20, Resident #46, and Resident #61) reviewed for ADL's. A) The facility failed to ensure assistance was provided for repositioning and incontinent care every 2 hours for Resident #4, and Resident #20. B) The facility failed to ensure Resident #3, Resident # 46 and Resident #61's nails were cleaned. These failures placed residents at risk for a decline in health, skin breakdown, loss of self-esteem, and a diminished quality of life and could result in health-related issues from lack of hygiene. Findings Included: A) Review of Resident #4's face sheet dated 05/07/2024 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses Dementia (A group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-09 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide, based on comprehensive assessment and care plan and the preferences of each resident, an ongoing program to support residents in their choices of activities, both facility-sponsored group and individual activities and independent activities, designed to meet the interest of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, encouraging interaction in the community for 4 of 8 residents (Resident #4, Resident #20, Resident #21, and Resident # 61) reviewed for activities. Residents #4, #20, #21, and Resident #61 were not receiving one-on-one activities or involved in group activities during the months of February, March, April, and May of 2024. This failure could place residents at risk for a decline in social, mental, psychosocial well-being, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #4's face sheet, dated 05/07/2024, revealed Resident #4 was an [AGE] year-old…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to prepare puree food by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance for 1 of 1 kitchen observed for puree preparation. The facility failed to follow the puree diet recipes. The puree diet meatloaf was mixed with water instead of thickener or a broth with nutrient value. This failure could affect residents on puree diet at risk of receiving inadequate diet that could affect their health. Findings included: Observation on 05/06/2024 at 12:08pm revealed [NAME] M pureed the meatloaf with water instead of the thickener on the counter. [NAME] M did not have any recipes out for the pureed food. Observation of [NAME] N pureeing food on 05/07/2024 at 10:41am did not have recipes out for the pureed food. An interview with [NAME] N on 05/07/2024 at 2:08pm revealed that [NAME] N had been trained on puree. She stated that when pureeing meat, broth or thickener was supposed to be used. She stated that when adding thickener or broth, a little at a time was added until the meat was at the proper texture.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for foods safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food safety and sanitation. The facility failed to ensure food that was prepped was labeled and dated. The facility failed to maintain proper temperatures of food before putting on the steam table. This failure placed residents at risk of foodborne illness. Findings included: Observation of the kitchen on 05/06/2024 at 6:52am revealed inside the walking cooler with milk, apple juice, and orange juice were not dated or labeled with the date they were prepped. In the freezer there were two bags of round pieces of dough that were not sealed or dated as to when it was opened. There were also sausage patties that were not sealed or dated in the freezer. In the dry food storage area, there was a container of flour that did not have a date as to when it was opened. Observation of [NAME] M on 05/06/2024 at 12:08pm revealed the temperature of the pureed meatloaf was 120 degrees when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1 of 9 (Resident # 39) residents in 1 of 3 dining rooms. The facility failed to promote Resident # 39's dignity while dining when staff did not serve his lunch tray for 20 minutes after his tablemate was served. This failure could affect all residents who were eating in the dining room, by contributing to poor self-esteem, and unmet needs. Findings included: Record review of Resident #39's Face Sheet dated 05/08/2024 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of intermittent explosive disorder (repeated, sudden bouts of impulsive, aggressive, violent behavior, or angry verbal outbursts), unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition ( a disorder caused by a lack of proper nutrition or an inability to absorb nutrients…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure the residents received services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of each resident's needs for 2 (Resident #45 and Resident #46) out of 14 reviewed for call lights. The facility failed to ensure Resident #45 and Resident #46's call lights were within reach. This failure could affect all residents who needed assistance with activities of daily living and could result in needs not being met. Findings included: Record review of Resident #45's Face Sheet dated, 05/08/2024, reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of essential tremor ( a condition that affects the nervous system, causing involuntary and shaking or trembling), unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, anxiety ( a mild cognitive impairment has yet to be diagnosed with no behaviors), repeated falls ( fall more than once a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment. for one resident (Resident #18) of eight reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters care plans, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #18's Comprehensive Care Plan reflected his use of an indwelling urinary catheter. These failures could place residents with indwelling urinary catheters at risk for urinary tract infections, change of condition and risk for not having their individually assessed needs met which could result in a diminished quality of care and staff being unaware of needed interventions. Findings included: Review of Resident #18's face sheet dated 05/08/2024 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses dementia (A group of symptoms…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident with limited range of motion receives appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or to prevent further decrease in range of motion for two of five residents (Resident #4 and Resident #20), reviewed with limited range of motion. A) The facility failed to ensure Resident #4 had interventions in place for her bilateral hand contractures (A permanent tightening of the muscles, tendons, skin, and surrounding tissues that causes the joints to shorten and stiffen and a decrease in ROM) to prevent further decline of the range of motion in her hands and failed to ensure her fingernails were trimmed. B) The facility failed to ensure Resident #20 had interventions in place for her right-hand contracture to prevent further decline of the range of motion in her right hand. This deficient practice placed residents with contractures at risk for decrease in mobility, range of motion, and contribute to worsening of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who are incontinent of bladder receive appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for one of four residents reviewed for catheters. (Resident #18) The facility failed to ensure Resident #18 received care to prevent urinary tract infections when they stored his catheter bag on the floor and failed to ensure a catheter secure device was in place to prevent dislodgment. These failures could place residents with foley catheters at risk for urinary tract infections and change of condition. Findings included: Review of Resident #18's face sheet dated 05/08/2024 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses dementia (A group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life.), Cerebrovascular disease (conditions that impact the blood vessels in your brain.), bipolar disorder (A serious mental illness…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who displayed or was diagnosed with dementia received the appropriate treatment and services to attain or maintain his or her highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, for one of 12 residents (Resident #18) reviewed for residents with dementia and behaviors. The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to address Resident #18's continuous behaviors regarding his indwelling catheter. This failure could place residents at risk for their medical, physical, and psychological needs not being met and placed residents with indwelling catheters at risk of urinary tract infections and traumatic removal of the catheter leading pain and injury. Findings included: Review of Resident #18's face sheet dated 05/08/2024 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses dementia (A group of symptoms…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases for two of four residents reviewed for infection control. (Residents #22 and #32) LVN A failed to sanitize the common glucometer, which is used during blood testing between resident blood sugar checks. This failure could lead to contamination of the nurse cart and potential resident exposure to blood-borne diseases. Findings Included: Review of Resident #22's face sheet dated 05/09/2024 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses Diabetes Mellitus Type II (A condition results from insufficient production of insulin, causing high blood sugar.) and Sepsis due to Methicillin Susceptible Staphylococcus Aureus (an infection caused by a type of bacteria commonly found on the skin). Review of Resident #22's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) program under Medicaid and incorporate the recommendations from the PASARR level II determination and the PASARR evaluation report into a resident's assessment, care planning, and transitions of care for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for PASARR coordination. The facility failed to ensure specialized OT, PT and ST evaluations and therapies were effectively requested for Resident #3 within three business days of a PASARR IDT meeting on [DATE] in which the services were agreed to be necessary. This failure placed residents at risk of not attaining the highest practicable well-being possible. Findings included: Review of the undated face sheet for Resident #3 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #3 had diagnoses which included mandibulofacial dysostosis (rare disorder of skull and facial development),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-23 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the completion of a significant change assessment for 1 (Resident #34) of 8 residents reviewed for Significant Change Assessments. The facility failed to ensure Resident #34 had a significant change assessment completed following the discharge from hospice service. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving adequate services and reimbursement to meet their needs. Findings included: Review of Resident #34's face sheet dated 03/23/23 revealed Resident #34 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hepatic failure, unspecified without coma (loss of brain function occurs when the liver is unable to remove toxins from the blood), hypothyroidism, unspecified (type of disorder of thyroid gland, a condition in which the production of thyroid hormone by the thyroid gland is diminished), type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications (a chronic disease affecting blood glucose regulation), unspecified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-23 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a PASRR screening was completed for residents with a mental disorder or an intellectual disability for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #25) reviewed for PASRR Level I screenings. The facility did not ensure an accurate PL1 screening (a preliminary assessment completed for all individuals prior to admission to a Medicaid-certified nursing facility to determine whether they might have a mental illness or intellectual disability) was completed for Resident #25. This failure could place residents at risk for a diminished quality of life and not receiving necessary care and services in accordance with individually assessed needs. Findings included: Record review of Resident #25's face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #25 had diagnoses which included Bipolar Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, Hypertension, Cognitive Communication Deficit (Difficulty with thinking and how someone uses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection and prevention control program that included, at a minimum, a system for preventing and controlling infections for 1 of 3 residents (Resident # 64) reviewed for wound care. Facility failed to ensure the scissors were sanitized before using it to cut wound care supplies while providing wound care to Resident #64 This failure could place the residents at risk for cross contamination and infection. Findings included: Record review of Resident #64's face sheet on 03/22/23 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertension, Open Left and right Foot Wound, Depression, Hyperlipidemia (excess fat in blood), chronic kidney disease and Cerebral Infarction (stroke). Record review on 03/23/23 of Resident #64's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 99 out of 15 indicating the resident chose not to participate or 4 or more items…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to post on a daily basis information that included the facility name, current date, total number and actual hours worked by registered nurses, licensed practical or licensed vocational nurses, certified nurse aides directly responsible for resident care per shift and the resident census for 2 of 2 days (05/05/2026 - 05/06/2026) reviewed for posting of required information. The facility failed to post the required current nurse staffing and census information from 04/29/2026 to 05/05/2026. This failure could place all residents, their families, and facility visitors at risk of not having access to information regarding staffing data and the facility census.Findings included:During an observation on 05/05/2026 at 09:20 A.M., a document labeled [facility name] Federal and State Staffing Level Requirements, dated 04/28/2026, was posted on a wall outside the ADM's office passed following entry to the facility. The document included the following information: census and the number and hours worked of registered nurses, licensed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-06-05 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to examine the results of the most recent survey of the facility conducted by Federal or State surveyors and any plan of correction in effect with respect to the facility and post in a place accessible to residents, family members and legal representatives of residents, the results of the most recent survey of the facility for 6 of 57 reviewed for rights to survey results. The facility failed to ensure survey results were not posted in a location readily accessible and visible to residents, their legal representatives, or family members. This failure could place residents at risk of having their rights limited to access information regarding the facility's compliance with state and federal requirements. Findings include: During an observation conducted on June 4, 2025 at 10:41 AM, the facility's survey results book was found placed behind a plant stand with a potted plant, blocking visibility and made it difficult to locate or access. The placement of the survey book was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2025-01-30 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure nurse staffing data was posted daily and readily accessible to residents and visitors with all required information for 7 (01/24/2025, 01/25/2025. 01/26/2025. 01/27/2025. 01/28/2025. 01/29/2025, and 01/30/2025) of 8 days reviewed for nurse staffing posting. The facility failed to post the daily staffing information in a prominent place on 01/24/2025, 01/25/2025, 01/26/2025, 01/27/2025, 01/28/2025, 01/29/2025, and 01/30/2025. This failure could place residents, families, and visitors at risk of not being informed of the census and number of staff working each day to provide care on all shifts. Findings: Record review of the facility's nursing staff information reflected the facility failed to complete and post the nursing staff information on the following dates 01/24/2025, 01/25/2025. 01/26/2025. 01/27/2025. 01/28/2025. 01/29/2025, and 01/30/2025 During an observation on 01/30/2025 at 8:50 am, revealed the nursing staffing information posted outside out the administrators office was dated 01/23/2025.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$105,594 in federal fines across 6 penalties.

  • $54,365 — penalty dated 2025-09-18
  • $10,361 — penalty dated 2025-08-12
  • $6,422 — penalty dated 2024-05-09
  • $17,329 — penalty dated 2024-03-08
  • $8,924 — penalty dated 2024-01-30
  • $8,193 — penalty dated 2023-12-07

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CREATIVE SOLUTIONS IN HEALTHCARE — 149 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.7-1.7 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.1-0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 1 of 53.2-2.2 vs chain
The other 148 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)
1 of 5Afton Oaks Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterHouston, TX 1 of 5Arlington Heights Health and Rehabilitation CenterFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Beltline Healthcare CenterGarland, TX 1 of 5Bluebonnet Nursing & RehabilitationKarnes City, TX 1 of 5Bluebonnet Point WellnessBullard, TX 1 of 5Brentwood Terrace Healthcare And RehabilitationParis, TX 1 of 5Buena Vida Nursing and Rehab-San AntonioSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Cottonwood Nursing & RehabilitationDenton, TX 1 of 5Countryview Nursing & RehabilitationTerrell, TX 1 of 5Dogwood Trails ManorWoodville, TX 1 of 5Downtown Health and Rehabilitation CenterFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Estates Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Fair Park Health & Rehabilitation CenterDallas, TX 1 of 5Five Points Nursing & Rehabilitation of College StCollege Station, TX 1 of 5Five Points at Lake Highlands Nursing and RehabDallas, TX 1 of 5Five Points of PflugervillePflugerville, TX 1 of 5Franklin Heights Nursing & RehabilitationEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Gilmer Nursing & RehabilitationGilmer, TX 1 of 5Grace Pointe Wellness CenterEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Graham Oaks Care CenterGraham, TX 1 of 5Granbury Care CenterGranbury, TX 1 of 5Greenhill VillasMount Pleasant, TX 1 of 5Heritage At Longview Healthcare CenterLongview, TX 1 of 5Huebner Creek Health & Rehabilitation CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Interlochen Health and Rehabilitation CenterArlington, TX 1 of 5Kenedy Health & RehabilitationKenedy, TX 1 of 5Kennedy Health & RehabLufkin, TX 1 of 5Lake Lodge Nursing & RehabilitationLake Worth, TX 1 of 5Lampstand Nursing and RehabilitationBryan, TX 1 of 5Lancaster Nursing & RehabilitationLancaster, TX 1 of 5Marine Creek Nursing & RehabilitationFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Mesa Vista Inn Health CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Mountain View Health & RehabilitationEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Normandy Terrace Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5North Pointe Nursing and RehabilitationWatauga, TX 1 of 5Park Place Care CenterGeorgetown, TX 1 of 5Parkview Manor Nursing and RehabilitationWeimar, TX 1 of 5Peach Tree PlaceWeatherford, TX 1 of 5Pebble Creek Nursing CenterEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Pecan Tree Rehab And Healthcare CenterGainesville, TX

Showing 40 of 148; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
HUGGINS, LINDAIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 02/01/2021
CREATIVE SOLUTIONS IN HEALTHCARE INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/01/2021
BLAKE, GARYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/01/2021
BLAKE, MALISAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/01/2021

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-13.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 84%Medicare 3%Other / private 13%

About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$207per resident / day
operating cost
$6,293per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$182per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675399. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next