No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Downtown Health and Rehabilitation Center

424 South Adams Street, Fort Worth, TX 76104 · Government - Hospital district · 161 certified beds · (817) 335-5781 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuse1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)2 actual-harm citations CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$36,418 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors recorded 3 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $36,418 in federal fines (most recent 2024-12-19)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (94%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
321 S Henderson St · (817) 529-9949 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
CarePlus0.1 mi
426 S Henderson St · (800) 746-7287 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
829 W Vickery Blvd · (817) 876-1980 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
908 Pennsylvania Ave · (817) 335-3222

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased13.8%15.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.7%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.9%2.4%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.7%3.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened8.7%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication12.6%18.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.7%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.5%3.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control12.4%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table6.3%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.0%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine58.3%88.0%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.1%25.7%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.8%12.3%12.0%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

36.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 31 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

36.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.23U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 30% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF36.7%CMS range 22.9–51.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.4%CMS range 7.5–16.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened7.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.851.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.35
RN hours/ resident / day
0.92
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.97
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.24
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.13
RN hoursweekends
93.6%
Total nursing turnover
88.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 161 beds and averages 99.4 residents a day — about 62% occupied, or roughly 62 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.24 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.97 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.83 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.41 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.44 to 0.13 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 94% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-12)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-19)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

52 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 39 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-02-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' right to be free from abuse for one (Resident #2) of five residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to prevent Resident #2 from being abused by Resident #1 on the secure unit, who had a history of being verbally and physically aggressive to other residents. Resident #1 physically attacked Resident #2 which resulted in him being sent to the hospital and sustained a serious injury to his right eye on 12/29/24. The non-compliance was identified as past non-compliance. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) began 12/29/24 and ended on 12/29/24. The facility corrected the non-compliance before surveyor's entrance. This failure could place all residents at risk for abuse that could lead to serious injury, harm, impairment, or death. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 01/16/25, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one (Resident #1) of six residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure medication administration and storage protocols were implemented when the facility lost Resident # 1's medications (narcotics used for withdrawal symptoms) upon admission into the facility, which resulted in Resident #1 not receiving the medication and experiencing withdrawal symptoms. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The noncompliance began on 02/10/24 and ended on 02/15/24. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs which could result in serious injury, illness, or death. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's Face Sheet, retrieved on 03/05/24, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards or practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan and the residents' choices for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure fall protocols were implemented when Resident # 1 was found on the floor on 9/15/23. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The noncompliance began on 9/15/23 and ended on 9/16/23. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could residents at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs which could result in serious injury, illness, or death. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 9/26/23, revealed a [AGE] year-old male, who was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included hypertensive heart and chronic kidney…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to, in accordance with State and Federal laws, store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature controls, and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys 1 of 7 residents (Residents #1) reviewed for hazards. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 did not have a bottle of Core Strength pills in his room on 06/16/26. These failures could place the residents at risk of accidental overdose, misuse of medications, and possible adverse reactions.Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet, dated 06/16/26, revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis that include Bilateral Primary Osteoarthritis of Knee (It happens when the slippery cartilage that cushions the ends of your bones gradually breaks down) Record review of Resident #1's MDS Assessment, dated 04/21/26, revealed BIMS score of 15 indicated thinking and memory are perfectly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 7 (Resident #2) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure that CNA C had on PPE when providing high contact care for Resident #1. This failure could place the residents at risk for spread of infection through cross-contamination of pathogens and illness. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's Face Sheet, dated 06/16/26, revealed an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis that include Gastrostomy status (Feeding Tube: a person has a surgically created, small opening in their belly that leads directly into their stomach and Senile degeneration of Brain (he gradual, permanent death of brain cells as a person ages, leading to cognitive decline) Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation for three of seven residents (Resident #1, Resident #2 and Resident#3) reviewed for abuse, neglect, and exploitation. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 was free from abuse by Resident #1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3 was free from verbal abuse by LVN B. This failure could place residents at risk for abuse or neglect that could lead to serious harm.Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 05/06/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included: dementia (decline in mental ability), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a progressive, irreversible lung disease that restricts airflow and makes breathing difficult), protein-calorie malnutrition (a severe nutritional deficiency resulting from inadequate intake of protein and calories), paranoid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials including to the State Survey Agency where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities in accordance with State law through established procedures for one of seven residents (Resident #3) reviewed for freedom from abuse, neglect, and exploitation. The facility failed to report the incident of alleged verbal abuse on 05/03/2025 for Resident #3. This failure could put the residents at risk of abuse, allegations of abuse not being reported immediately, and could result in physical and psychosocial harm. Findings included: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet, dated 05/06/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted [DATE]. Resident #3 had diagnoses including: heart failure (heart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have evidence that all allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, were thoroughly investigated for one of seven residents (Resident #3) reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility did not investigate an incident in which Resident #3 was cussed by LVN B. This failure could place residents at risk for abuse/neglect and could lead to a diminished quality of life and psychosocial harm. Findings included: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet, dated 05/06/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted [DATE]. Resident #3 had diagnoses including: heart failure (heart muscle does not pump blood as effectively as it should), personal history of transient ischemic attack and cerebral infarction (indicate a significantly elevated risk for future, more severe strokes, often referred to as a warning stroke), protein-calorie malnutrition (a severe nutritional deficiency resulting from inadequate intake of protein and calories), type 2 diabetes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one of eight residents (Resident #4) and the facility's water management system reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to perform wound care by not covering Resident #4's right foot prior to leaving the room and being in common areas.2. The facility failed to identify situations that could lead to Legionella growth and to implement measures to prevent the growth of opportunistic waterborne pathogens (control measures), and how to monitor them. This failure could place residents at risk of cross-contamination, increased risk of infection and the spread of infection. Findings included: In an interview on 3/11/2026 at 02:20 p.m., the Maintenance Director stated he was not aware of a facility water management plan and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide services to residents with reasonable accommodations of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health and safety of the resident or other residents for 1 of 12 (Resident #91) reviewed for call lights. The facility failed to keep Resident #91's call light off the floor and within his grasp so Resident #91 could communicate to staff when he needed assistance. This failure placed residents at risk for not getting their needs met and a diminished quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #91's Face Sheet, dated 3-10-2026, revealed a [AGE] year-old male with an initial admission date of 8-29-2024 and a re-admission date of 7-26-2025. Resident #91 had a primary diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic Polyneuropathy (a chronic disorder characterized by high blood sugar [hyperglycemia] that causes widespread damage to peripheral nerves.), Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0635 — isolated
    Provide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure at the time each resident was admitted the facility had a physician order for the resident's immediate care for 1 of 5 (Resident #25) reviewed for residents receiving care and services upon admission. The facility failed to ensure Resident #25 had a current physician's order for use of oxygen after readmission to the facility. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving necessary care and services. Record review of Resident #25's annual MDS, dated [DATE], reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #25 had diagnoses which included interstitial pulmonary disease (a group of over 200 disorders causing progressive inflammation and scarring [fibrosis] of lung tissue, making it difficult to breathe and transfer oxygen to the blood), end-stage renal disease (when kidneys no longer function well enough to meet a body's needs), and chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living receives the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for one of 12 (Resident #104) reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to ensure Resident #104's shirt and pants were changed, which were covered in food, after being fed lunch on 3-10-2026. This failure could place residents at risk for low self-esteem and self-worth causing negative psychosocial outcomes affecting their health. Findings included:Record review of Resident #104's Face Sheet, dated 3-10-2026, revealed a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease (a neurodegenerative disorder that impairs motor function due to the loss of brain cells that produce dopamine) and secondary diagnoses of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (high blood glucose [sugar] levels, often stemming from insulin resistance. In this…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were given the appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve his or her ability to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) to maintain good personal hygiene, for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for ADLs.The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was provided with a shower on 01/20/2026 and 02/09/2026.This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving care and services needed to maintain quality of life and prevent decline in their mental and psychological well-being. Record review of Resident #1's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted from an acute care hospital on [DATE]. She was assessed as cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15. She was independent with eating, oral hygiene, upper body dressing, required set-up or clean-up assistance with person hygiene, and supervisory assistance with shower/baths. She was documented as having a fall in the last…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 39 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to be free from abuse for one (Resident #1) of 4 residents reviewed for abuse, in that: On 09/16/2025 the facility failed to ensure that Resident #1 was not spoken to in a verbally abusive way by CNA A who called Resident #1 an expletive. This failure could result in resident abuse and mental decline. Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's admission record revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of [NAME]-[NAME] Syndrome (a rare genetic disorder characterized by a constant feeling of hunger (hyperphagia), which leads to obesity if not managed.)Review of Resident #1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 09(Moderate cognitive impairment.) Review of Resident #1's Care Plan dated 11/24/2025 revealed Focus: Behavior: Resident #1 exhibits maladaptive behavior at times r/t intellectual disability poor coping skills behave at an age lower than her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury for 1 of 3 (Resident #2) residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility LVN A, LVN B, CNA C and CNA D did not report Resident #2's allegations of abuse and neglect to the Admin who was the abuse coordinator. This failure could place residents at risk of injuries, abuse, and/or neglect. Findings Include: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated 01/16/25, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with a diagnoses which included: paraplegia unspecified (the symptom of paralysis that mainly affects your legs though it can sometimes affect…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 (medication cart) of 1 medication cart on the memory care unit reviewed for pharmacy services The facility failed to ensure discontinued medication were removed from the medication cart. Resident #1's Diazepam that was DC on 12/30/24 was in the narcotic box on the secure unit medication cart. This failure could place residents at risk of unnecessary medication error and/or lead to possible harm or drug diversion. The findings included: Interview on 5/13/25 at 9:50 PM LVN A stated when medications were wasted, they should be crushed and disposed of and two people, 2 nurses, were to sign off on the narcotics sheet and document medication was wasted. Observation and record review on 05/13/25 at 11:00 PM revealed a secure unit narcotic sheet that was not filled out completely for Resident #1's Diazepam 5 mg tablet. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-08 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed ensure residents were free of any significant medication errors for one (Residents #1) of four residents reviewed for medications. 1. Resident #1's Lisinopril and Metoprolol (medications used to lower blood pressure) were not held per physician's order on 07/13/25, 07/21/25, 07/23/24, and 07/25/24 when the resident's blood pressure was below parameters. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving their medications as ordered or possible illness. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female, with an admission date of 07/11/24. Resident #1 had a diagnoses of Multiple Sclerosis (chronic disease that affects the brain and spinal cord), Cognitive Communication Deficit (communication difficulty), Essential Hypertension (high blood pressure), and History of Transient Ischemic Attack (brief interruption of blood flow to the brain). The face sheet noted a discharge date of 09/17/24. Record review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 4 residents, (Resident #1) reviewed for care plans. 1. The facility failed to address Resident #1's multiple refusals of care and services on the comprehensive care plan This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the necessary care and services. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female, with an admission date of 07/11/24. Resident #1 had diagnoses of Multiple Sclerosis (chronic disease that affects the brain and spinal cord), Cognitive Communication Deficit (communication difficulty), and History of Transient Ischemic Attack (brief interruption of blood flow to the brain). The face…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 (Resident #2) of 3 residents reviewed for infection control. 1. The Treatment Nurse failed to discard contaminated gauze after performing wound care on Resident #2 on 05/07/25. This failure could put residents at risk of infection from cross contamination. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 05/08/25, reflected a [AGE] year-old female, with an admission date of 05/05/25. Resident #2 had diagnoses of Chronic Venous Hypertension with Ulcer of Bilateral Lower Extremity (damaged leg veins that causes blood pressure build up and skin breakdown), and Type 2 Diabetes with foot ulcer (body cannot regulate blood sugar levels). In an observation and interview on 05/08/25 starting at 8:40…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-04 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status for one (Resident #1) of two residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status as demonstrated by Resident #1 experiencing a 25.96% weight loss in 4 months. She had an active decline in her weight from 01/08/25 - 04/15/25. This failure could place residents at risk for decreased nutritional status, decline in health, malnutrition, or hospitalization. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's admission record reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including protein-calorie malnutrition (a nutritional status in which reduced availability of nutrients leads to changes in body composition and function), diabetes mellitus (a group of metabolic diseases characterized by high blood sugar levels), dependence on renal dialysis (when a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for one (Residents #6) of four reviewed for adequate supervision. LVN R failed to complete a fall assessment and implement interventions for Resident #6 after a fall, to prevent reoccurrence. The facility failed to ensure an updated fall assessment was complete for Resident #6. This failure could affect residents by not having the necessary resources to ensure appropriate care, interventions, and supervision were provided. Findings included: Review of Resident #6's Face Sheet dated 04/01/2025 revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female was initially admitted on [DATE], and again on 08/20/2024. Relevant diagnoses were alcohol dependence with alcohol-induced persisting dementia, unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, other reduced mobility, history of falling, other lack of coordination, unsteadiness on feet, muscle weakness (generalized),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents, who needed respiratory care, were provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for one (Resident #6) of 3 residents reviewed for Respiratory Care. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #6's nasal cannula and tubing was off the floor, properly stored when not in use, and her humidifier bottle water was dated. These failures could place the residents at risk for respiratory infection and not having their respiratory needs met. Findings included: Review of Resident #6's Face Sheet, dated 04/01/25, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female was initially admitted on [DATE], and again on 08/20/2024. The resident was diagnosed with alcohol dependence with alcohol induced persisting dementia (cognitive decline from alcohol use), Chronic pain, History of falling, benign neoplasm of left bronchus…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals were accurately dispensed and administered to meet the needs of each resident when 1 (Resident #5) of 3 residents were reviewed for pharmaceutical services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #5 did not miss a dose of antibiotic medication that was to be administered on 12/21/24. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving their medications as ordered by their physician. Review of Resident #5's Face Sheet, dated 12/23/24, reflected Resident #5 admitted [DATE] with paraplegia (paralysis in lower half of body) and right femur (large bone in upper leg) chronic osteomyelitis (bone infection). Review of Resident #5's Physician Order, dated 12/20/24, reflected an order for Vancomycin (antibiotic that treats infection caused by bacteria) intravenous (administer directly into a person's vein) solution 750 mg plus 500 mg = 1250 mg intravenously every 12 hours (at 09:00 AM and 09:00 PM) for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional standard for 1 of 2 medication rooms (Med Room A) reviewed for storage of drugs. ADON A failed to ensure medications were secured and not left out in the open outside Med Room A. This could affect residents by placing them at risk of medication not meeting therapeutic levels, misuse and diversion. Findings included: Review of Resident #12's face sheet, dated 12/19/24, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of epilepsy (seizure disorder), schizophrenia ( a serious mental health condition that affects a person's thoughts, feelings and behaviors), and essential hypertension (high-blood pressure). Review of Resident #51's face sheet, dated 12/19/24, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of type 2 diabetes, heart failure, and personal history of transient…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, and accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food and nutrition services. 1. The facility failed to ensure stored food was properly labeled (marked or identified with the contents in the bag), dated ( date the item was received into the facility) . These failures could place all residents at risk of cross contamination and food-borne illness. Findings include: Observation on 12/17/2024 at 8:47 AM, during initial kitchen rounds of 1 of 1 walk-in freezer revealed: 1. An unopened bag of 8 pack of pre-made frozen pancakes, a unopen bag of broccoli were not labeled (marked or identified with the contents in the bag) and not dated (date the item was received into the facility) and not in the original box. 2. Open cardboard box contained individual 4 fl oz magic cup ice cream containers the top of the box had ice crystal conduction collected on top. Interview on 12/19/2025 at 9:42 AM with Dietary Manager revealed the expectation is staff are to close…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-19 · tag F0825 — pattern
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide specialized rehabilitative services such as but not limited to physical therapy, speech therapy-language pathology, occupational therapy, respiratory therapy, and rehabilitative services for mental illness and intellectual disability or services of a lesser intensity as required in the resident's comprehensive plan of care for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #111) reviewed for specialized rehabilitative services. The facility failed to screen Resident #1 and Resident #111 for physical therapy. This failure could place residents who required rehabilitative services at risk of a decline or decrease in their physical capabilities. Findings included: Review of Resident # 1's face sheet, dated 12/19/2024, revealed a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus, personal history of transient ischemic attack (stroke), heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 4 of 30 residents reviewed for infection control (Resident 34, #59, #88, and #369) 1. The facility failed to follow EBP (Enhanced Barrier Precautions) procedures for Resident #34 when LVN Failed to wear PPE while administering medications to Resident #34. 2. The facility failed to follow contact isolation precautions (this is a precaution used to prevent the spread of germs that are spread by touching a person or their belonging) when ADON A and the wound care physician failed to don (to put on) PPE while providing wound care for Resident #369. 3. CNA C failed to sanitize her hands in between feeding Resident #59 and Resident #88. These failures affected residents by placing them at an increased and unnecessary risk of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to care for residents in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for two of four residents (Resident #59 and 88) reviewed for resident rights. CNA C failed to ensure the dignity of Residents #59 and #88 was respected during the breakfast meal when CNA C yelled in front of the residents at Laundry Aide D while they were being fed. This failure could place residents who need assistance with eating at risk for weight loss and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Review of Resident #88's face sheet, dated 12/18/24, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE], with the diagnoses of cognitive communication deficit, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and legal blindness. Review of Resident #88's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 11/15/24, revealed the resident was rarely/never understood. Resident #88 was dependent on staff on eating. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #115) reviewed for accidents and supervision. The facility failed to ensure Resident #115 received adequate supervision when he went out into the courtyard to smoke during non-smoking times. This failure placed residents who required supervision at risk of injury or accidents. Findings included: Review of Resident #115's face sheet, dated 12/18/24, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of staphylococcus arthritis, right knee, methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus infection as the cause of disease (MRSA - a type of bacteria that many antibiotics don't work on), and hypertension (high-blood pressure). Review of Resident #115's initial MDS Assessment, dated 12/08/24, revealed the resident had a BIMS score of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for two (Resident #34 and Resident #74) of five residents reviewed for pharmaceutical services. LVN E failed to hold medication Furosemide 40 MG with parameter to hold at SBP less than110 when Resident #34's BP was 95/84. LVN E failed to check vancomycin blood level (trough) results for Resident #74 before administering vancomycin antibiotic. These failures placed residents at risk for not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of their medications or receiving them as prescribed, per physician orders. Findings included: Review of Resident #34's face sheet, dated 12/18/24, revealed the resident was an [AGE] year-old female readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of type 2 diabetes, sepsis, and hypertension. Review of Resident #34's physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-04 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I residents with mental illness were provided with a PASRR Evaluation assessment for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #5) reviewed for preadmission screenings. The facility failed to refer Resident #5 for PASRR Evaluation after a positive Level 1 PASRR 1 screening. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving inadequate care. The surveyor was unable to interview and observe Resident #5, as he was discharged on 11/02/24. Record review of Resident # 5's face sheet dated 12/04/24 revealed that he was a 68 -year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 11/02/24. His active diagnosis included: cognitive communication deficit (difficulty communicating caused by cognitive impairment), anxiety disorder (fear and worrying) and depression disorder (mood of sadness). Record review of Resident #5's admission MDS dated [DATE], reflected a BIMS score of 12 indicating…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-04 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care that was developed within 48 hours of resident's admission for 1 (Resident #5) of 4 residents reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #5's baseline care plan addressed his Level 1 PASSR, mental illness, anxiety, and depression within 48 hours of resident's admission. This failure could place the residents at increased risk of not having their individual needs identified, met and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: The surveyor was unable to interview and observe Resident #5, as he was discharged on 11/02/24. Record review of Resident # 5's face sheet dated 12/04/24 revealed that he was a 68 -year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 11/01/24. He had an active diagnosis of cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible to prevent accidents for 4 (Resident#1, Resident#2, Resident#3, and Resident#4) of 6 residents reviewed for hazards. The facility failed to ensure Resident#1 and Resident#4 did not keep cigarettes and lighters on themselves. The facility failed to ensure (Resident#2 and Resident#3) did not pick up cigarette butts left on the ground to reuse. These failures placed residents at risk of being burned. Findings included: Record review of Resident#1's face sheet dated 09/11/24 reflected he was a [AGE] year-old, male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident#1 was diagnosed with unspecified Dementia, syncope and collapse, anxiety disorder, history of falling, and nicotine dependence. Record review of Resident#1's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] reflected: Resident#1 had a BIMS score of 13 which indicted cognition intact. Record review of Resident#1's care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-05 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — pattern
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents received proper treatment and care to maintain mobility and good foot health, and failed to provide foot care and treatment, in accordance with professional standards of practice, including to prevent complications from the resident's medical condition(s) for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #1) reviewed for foot care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had her toenails trimmed by a podiatrist. This failure could place residents at risk of discomfort, poor foot hygiene, or a decline in residents' physical condition. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission record, dated 09/05/2024, revealed an [AGE] year-old female who admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's Disease, muscle wasting and atrophy, muscle weakness, and cognitive communication deficit. Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected a BIMS score of 00, indicating severe cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #2 and Resident #3) reviewed for ADL care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 and Resident #3 were provided nail care as needed. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving services and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's admission Record, dated 09/05/2024, revealed a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction, vascular dementia, contracture, left hand, and cognitive communication deficit. Record review of Resident #2's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 08/27/2024 revealed a BIMS score of 9, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Record review of Resident 21's care plan, dated 11/23/2023, revealed Resident #1 had an ADL Self Care Performance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for 2 (Resident #10 and Resident #11) of 9 residents reviewed for ADL care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #10, and Resident #11 were provided showers as scheduled. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving services and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #11's admission record, dated 07/23/2024, revealed a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, end stage renal disease, muscle weakness, and dependence on renal dialysis. Record review of Resident #11's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE], reflected a BIMS score of 14, indicating intact cognition. Further review of the MDS revealed Resident #11 required partial/moderate assistance for showering/bathing. Record review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained free of accident hazards as was possible for 1 of 1 secured unit dining room reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility failed to ensure residents who used the dining/activity room in the secured unit were free of hazards, when a window air condition unit cord was loose while plugged into a live extension cord coiled unsecured above a doorway. This failure could place residents at risk for accidents or injuries resulting from hazards in the facility. Findings included: Observation on 07/23/2024 at 12:22PM of the secured unit dining/activity room revealed approximately 22 residents who were seated at tables waiting on lunch trays to be served by staff. A table that was pushed against the wall by the door to the secure courtyard had three residents seated. The window unit was directly beside a resident chair with the loose cord hanging down near the floor and curved upwards attached to an extension cord that could be easily reached by residents. The extra length…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-27 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse and neglect for one (Resident #1) of one incident reviewed for reporting according to facility policy. CNA A failed to follow the facility's policy to report allegations of abuse when allegedly she observed CNA B hold Resident #1 down in a choke hold on 04/24/24. This failure could place the residents in the facility at risk of abuse and lack of timely reporting of incidents. Findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse/Neglect, revised 03/29/18, reflected the following: The resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation as defined in this subpart. This includes but is not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion and any physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms. Residents should not be subjected to abuse by anyone,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse were reported immediately to the Administrator of the facility for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for reporting abuse and neglect. CNA A failed to immediately report to the Administrator an allegation of abuse involving CNA B and Resident #1 that allegedly occured on 04/24/24. The failure placed residents at risk of not having abuse allegations reported. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet revealed the resident was [AGE] year-old male, admitted on [DATE], with diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (brain disorder that causes memory loss), muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, abnormalities of gait and mobility, abnormal posture (involuntary position of the body), delusional disorders (one or more persistent beliefs that are not based on reality). Review of Resident #1's MDS dated [DATE] revealed the Resident #1 had a BIMS score of 00, indicating Resident #1 was not able to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record reviews, the facility failed to review and revise care plans for 2 (Residents #1 and #2) of 5 residents reviewed for care plan revision. The facility failed to revise Resident #1 and #2's care plans to reflect their need for direct supervision while smoking. This failure could place the residents at risk of harm to themselves or other residents Findings included: Review of Resident #1's undated admission Record revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included paralysis, seizures, stroke affecting left side, and cardiac pacemaker. Review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 15 indicating she was cognitively intact. Her Functional Status indicated she required a wheelchair for mobility, and limited assistance with her ADLs. Review of Resident #1's care plan revealed she did not have a focus area on smoking and/or smoking with supervision. Review of Resident #1's monthly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 5 (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5) of 5 residents reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility failed to ensure Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5 were supervised while smoking This failure could place the residents at risk of injuring themselves or harming another resident. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's undated admission Record revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included paralysis, seizures, stroke affecting left side, and cardiac pacemaker. Review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 15 indicating she was cognitively intact. Her Functional Status indicated she required a wheelchair for mobility, and limited assistance with her ADLs. Review of Resident #1's care plan revealed she did not have a focus area on smoking and/or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-20 · tag F0914 — isolated
    Provide bedrooms that don't allow residents to see each other when privacy is needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assure full visual privacy for 2 (Residents #6 and #7) of 5 residents reviewed for privacy. The facility failed to provide privacy curtains for Residents #6 and #7 while their curtains were being laundered. This failure could place the residents at risk of decreased feelings of self -worth. Findings included: Review of Resident #6's undated admission Record revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included bone infection, diabetes, amputation of right leg below the knee, and Opioid abuse. Review of Resident #6's admission MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 15 indicating he was cognitively intact. His Functional Status indicted he was mostly independent in his ADLs. Review of Resident #6's care plan, dated 04/20/24, revealed he had a focus area for a surgical incision to his right toes and left leg requiring wound care and a focus area for the resident's self-care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-07 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents receive proper treatment and care to maintain good foot health by providing foot care and treatment, in accorance with professional standards of practice, including to prevent complications from the resident's medical condition, for four of eight residents (Residents #1, #2, #3 and #4) reviewed for foot care. The facility failed ensure foot care, specifically trimming of toenails, was provided for Residents #1, #2, and #3. This failure could result in residents developing fungal infections or other podiatric problems. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's undated admission Record revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to that facility on 05/10/23 with diagnoses that included senile degeneration of the brain (severe decline in mental ability), high blood pressure, and delusions. Review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 02/23/24, revealed a BIMS score not calculated due to her mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-21 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property for 1 of 4 residents (Resident's #1) reviewed for abuse. 1. The facility failed to implement their policy on reporting abuse for a resident-to-resident altercation that occurred on 02/18/2024 between Resident #1 and Resident #2. 2. The facility failed to implement their policy and procedures on investigating allegations of abuse for a resident-to-resident altercation that occurred on 02/18/2024 between Resident #1 and Resident #2. These deficient practices could place residents at risk for abuse, neglect, and not having their needs met. Findings include: Resident #1 A record review of Resident #1's electronic face sheet, dated 02/21/24, reflected Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male, who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia ,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse were reported immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, for 2 of 4 residents (Residents #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to report a resident-to-resident altercation that occurred on 02/18/24 between Resident #1 and Resident #2 to the State Survey Agency within 2 hours of being notified. This failure could place residents at risk for abuse. Findings include: Resident #1 A record review of Resident #1's electronic face sheet, dated 02/21/24, reflected Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male, who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia , abnormalities of gait (a change to your walking pattern) and mobility, and muscle weakness. A record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], reflected Resident #1 was able to complete a BIMS assessment and had a BIMS score of 0, which indicated his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure in response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, the facility must have evidence that all alleged violations were thoroughly investigated for 1 of 4 residents (Residents #1) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to thoroughly investigate a resident-to-resident altercation that occurred on 02/18/24 between Resident #1 and Resident #2. This failure could place residents at risk for abuse. Findings include: Resident #1 A record review of Resident #1's electronic face sheet, dated 02/21/24, reflected Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male, who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia , abnormalities of gait (a change to your walking pattern) and mobility, and muscle weakness. A record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], reflected Resident #1 was able to complete a BIMS assessment and had a BIMS score of 0, which indicated his cognition was severely…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical and psychosocial needs for one (Resident #2) of 2 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to develop and implement a care plan addressing Resident #2's behaviors. This failures placed residents at risk of not receiving necessary care and services to meet his individual needs. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's admission record revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included unspecified Dementia, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance. Assigned to the secured unit. Record review of Resident #2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/14/2023 revealed his (BIMS) score was 00 (severe cognitive impairment). Review of Resident #2's care plan dated 10/17/2023 revealed there was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for one (Resident #1) of two residents observed for accidents. Resident #1's bed's wheels failed to lock when placed in the lowest position allowing the bed to roll away from the wall, which caused Resident #1 to fall through the gap. This deficient practice has potential to affect residents by placing them at risk for serious injuries and accidents. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's current admission record, dated12/19/23, revealed a [AGE] year-old male with an admission date of 11/08/2014. Resident #1's diagnosis included unspecified convulsions (a sudden, violent, irregular movement of a limb or of the body, caused by involuntary contraction of muscles and associated especially with brain disorders). Resident #1 placed on the secured unit. Record review of Resident #1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-15 · tag F0710 — isolated
    Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a physician signed and dated orders for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #66 and Resident #256) reviewed for medical records. The facility failed to obtain orders for contact isolation for Resident #66 and Resident #256. This failure placed residents at risk for not receiving appropriate care. Findings included: Record review of Resident #66's face sheet, dated 11/15/2023, revealed a [AGE] year-old female with original admission date of 12/22/2023 and readmission date of 10/02/2023. Resident #66's diagnoses included senile degeneration of brain, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left side, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, and Type 2 Diabetes. Record review of Resident #66's admission MDS, dated [DATE], reflected a BIMS score of 14 indicating intact cognition. Observation on 11/12/2023 at 11:38 a.m., of Resident #66's room revealed signage with report to nurse on door, PPE in organizer hanging on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the facility's only kitchen observed for: 1. The facility failed to ensure food items, placed in the refrigerator, were dated, and labeled appropriately. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk for food-borne illness. Findings included: An observation and interview on 11/12/2023, at 9:37am, revealed two prepared salads, in containers sealed in cellophane, not labeled nor dated. Dietary Aide A stated she put the salads in the refrigerator, got busy with other task, and forgot to date and label the salads. Dietary Aide A stated the importance of dating and labeling food items put in refrigerators, is to inform other staff how long the items have been in the refrigerator so residents will not get food borne illness. In an interview with the Dietary Manager, on 11/14/2023, at 11:55a.m., it was stated that her expectation for her staff is to date, label, and seal foods that are put in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-15 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to keep garbage storage receptacles in a sanitary condition according to professional standards for 1 of 1 kitchen for kitchen sanitation. The facility failed to keep garbage receptacles covered with lids, in the kitchen area, while food was being prepared. This failure could place residents at risk for contracting food-borne illness. Findings included: During an observation on 11-12-2023, at 9:45am, a large trash can was observed to have a liner, with trash contents, in the kitchen area, without a lid or covering. The trash can was not currently in use. During an interview with the Dietary Manager, on 11-12-2023, at 9:55am, she stated the trash can should have a lid on it. The Dietary Manager then kicked the trash can into another room but still did not put a lid on the receptacle. During an interview with the Administrator on 11-14-2023, at 2:00pm she stated that her expectation is that trash receptacles, in the kitchen area, be always covered with a lid. Review of the facility's Kitchen Waste Control and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-15 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public for one (secure unit hall) of three halls reviewed for environment. The facility failed to ensure a safe, functional, sanitary and comfortable environment for residents staff and the public. The facility failed to ensure the secure unit did not have a strong urine odor. This failure could place residents at risk for a diminished quality of life. Findings included: Observation on 11/12/2023 at 10:13 a.m., upon entrance to the secure unit, the hallway near the entrance and towards the middle of the hallway had a urine odor. The floors appeared clean. Residents appeared well groomed and dressed and no residents appeared soiled. Observation and interview on 11/14/2023 at 1:14 p.m., revealed a strong urine odor at the entrance of the secure unit, down the hallway and near the dining room. CNA A stated she noticed the odor and stated residents go to the bathroom anywhere. She stated the rooms and hallway are clean,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$36,418 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

  • $16,859 — penalty dated 2024-12-19
  • $10,225 — penalty dated 2024-02-21
  • $9,334 — penalty dated 2023-09-26

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CREATIVE SOLUTIONS IN HEALTHCARE — 149 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.1-0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.2-1.2 vs chain
The other 148 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)
1 of 5Afton Oaks Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterHouston, TX 1 of 5Arlington Heights Health and Rehabilitation CenterFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Beltline Healthcare CenterGarland, TX 1 of 5Bluebonnet Nursing & RehabilitationKarnes City, TX 1 of 5Bluebonnet Point WellnessBullard, TX 1 of 5Brentwood Terrace Healthcare And RehabilitationParis, TX 1 of 5Buena Vida Nursing and Rehab-San AntonioSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Cottonwood Nursing & RehabilitationDenton, TX 1 of 5Countryview Nursing & RehabilitationTerrell, TX 1 of 5Dogwood Trails ManorWoodville, TX 1 of 5Estates Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Fair Park Health & Rehabilitation CenterDallas, TX 1 of 5Five Points Nursing & Rehabilitation of College StCollege Station, TX 1 of 5Five Points at Lake Highlands Nursing and RehabDallas, TX 1 of 5Five Points of PflugervillePflugerville, TX 1 of 5Franklin Heights Nursing & RehabilitationEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Gilmer Nursing & RehabilitationGilmer, TX 1 of 5Grace Pointe Wellness CenterEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Graham Oaks Care CenterGraham, TX 1 of 5Granbury Care CenterGranbury, TX 1 of 5Greenhill VillasMount Pleasant, TX 1 of 5Heritage At Longview Healthcare CenterLongview, TX 1 of 5Huebner Creek Health & Rehabilitation CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Interlochen Health and Rehabilitation CenterArlington, TX 1 of 5Kenedy Health & RehabilitationKenedy, TX 1 of 5Kennedy Health & RehabLufkin, TX 1 of 5Lake Lodge Nursing & RehabilitationLake Worth, TX 1 of 5Lampstand Nursing and RehabilitationBryan, TX 1 of 5Lancaster Nursing & RehabilitationLancaster, TX 1 of 5Marine Creek Nursing & RehabilitationFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Mesa Vista Inn Health CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Mountain View Health & RehabilitationEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Navasota Nursing & RehabilitationNavasota, TX 1 of 5Normandy Terrace Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5North Pointe Nursing and RehabilitationWatauga, TX 1 of 5Park Place Care CenterGeorgetown, TX 1 of 5Parkview Manor Nursing and RehabilitationWeimar, TX 1 of 5Peach Tree PlaceWeatherford, TX 1 of 5Pebble Creek Nursing CenterEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Pecan Tree Rehab And Healthcare CenterGainesville, TX

Showing 40 of 148; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
FANNIN COUNTY HOSPITAL AUTHORITYOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 03/31/2017
HOLT, ERINIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 02/25/2020
KEETON, WENDYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 10/29/2012
KISSLING, MONICAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 06/21/2017
MCBEAN, PATRICIAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 08/30/2021
SANDERSON, CLARKIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/29/2012
TROMPLER, KELLYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 02/22/2022
HUGGINS, LINDAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 11/01/2022
WILLIG, ZACHARYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2025
FORT WORTH IV ENTERPRISES, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2022
BLAKE, GARYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2022
BLAKE, MALISAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/01/2022
AKINMERESE, OLAWALEIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 04/14/2025
FORD, CHRISTINAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 04/12/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-10.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 87%Medicare 3%Other / private 10%

About 87% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$232per resident / day
operating cost
$7,042per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$210per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 455651. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next