No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Five Points Nursing & Rehabilitation of College St

3105 Corsair Drive, College Station, TX 77845 · For profit - Corporation · 130 certified beds · (979) 213-6105 Medicare only — no Medicaid

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuse3 immediate-jeopardy citations1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$39,676 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2025
  • inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (29) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $39,676 in federal fines (most recent 2026-03-02)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2805 Earl Rudder Fwy S · (979) 680-8808 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1815 Brothers Blvd · (979) 693-3841 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2704 Texas Ave S · (979) 695-6888 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1700 Sebesta Rd · (979) 764-3486 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-10 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased16.5%15.8%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.8%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.7%0.3%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms6.8%2.4%6.5%typical
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.9%3.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened12.4%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication18.0%18.0%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.6%3.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control15.6%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table14.1%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.4%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%88.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission34.9%25.7%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit11.8%12.3%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.732.171.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.602.061.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.38U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.16hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.17hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 51.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 56 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 65% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge51.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge39.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge44.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified95.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge93.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.9%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.32
RN hours/ resident / day
0.60
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.76
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.69
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.16
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 130 beds and averages 95.7 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 34 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.69 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.76 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.32 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.84 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.39 to 0.16 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-23)
0
at the previous standard inspection (2024-03-12)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible and each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 (Resident #2) of 3 residents. The facility failed, on 12/08/25, to ensure two staff members assisted Resident #2 off the toilet and onto her wheelchair. Resident #2 fell and hit her knee on the toilet paper dispenser when CNA E transferred her off the toilet alone. Resident complained of pain. On 12/10/25 an x-ray revealed Resident #2 had a broken femur, was sent to the hospital and had surgery. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 12/21/2025. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 2:07 pm. While the IJ was removed on 12/22/25 at 7:54 pm, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and severity level of no actual harm. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated 12/21/25, revealed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-08-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation for 1 out of 8 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse/neglect. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was not neglected by not checking on Resident #1 from 2:40pm - 4:40pm on 08/26/2025. Resident #1 was found outside with a temperature of 104 degrees [F] and sent to the hospital due to being unresponsive and tachycardic (your heart is beating too fast, over 100 times a minute at rest). The temperature on 08/26/25 was a high of 97 degrees [F]. An IJ was identified on 08/28/2025 at 4:15 PM. While the IJ was removed on 08/29/2025 at 10:27 AM, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of no actual harm with the potential for more than minimal harm that was not immediate jeopardy and a scope of isolated due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems This deficient…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision for 1 of 8 resident (Resident #1) reviewed for supervision. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had adequate supervision or was checked on for over two hours as he was found outside on 08/26/25 with a temperature of 104 degrees [F] and sent to the hospital due to being unresponsive and tachycardic (your heart is beating too fast, over 100 times a minute at rest). The temperature on 08/26/25 was a high of 97 degrees [F]. An IJ was identified on 08/28/2025 at 4:15 PM. While the IJ was removed on 08/29/2025 at 10:27 AM, the facility remained out of compliance at a level of no actual harm at a scope of isolated with a potential for more than minimal harm, that was not immediate jeopardy, due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems This deficient practice placed residents at risk for falls, injuries, dehydration, hospitalization, and death. Findings…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible and that each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents hazards and supervision. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's fall mat was in place, and the bed was in low position on 02/12/2026 at approximately 7:00 a.m., when he was found lying on the floor. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The noncompliance began on 02/12/2026 and ended on 02/12/2026. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could place residents at risk for falls with the possibility of injury, including fractures.Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 03/02/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE], diagnoses included unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-01-26 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, as determined by resident assessments and individual plans of care and considering the number, acuity and diagnoses of the facility's resident population in accordance with a current accurate facility assessment for 9 of 11 residents ( Residents #1, #2, #3, #4 #5, #6, #7,#8 and #11). 1. The facility failed to ensure sufficient staff to provide Resident #6 needed care to prevent feelings of helplessness and pain from prolonged exposure to diarrhea for 3 hours while unable to obtain assistance. Residents #4 and #7 needed care including incontinent care and repositioning on 1/23/2025 for an unknown amount of time. 2. The facility failed to provide adequate staff to provide showers to Residents #1, #2,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2025-01-26 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to maintain the highest practicable well-being of each resident for for 9 of 11 residents ( Residents #1, #2, #3, #4 #5, #6, #7,#8 and #11). 1. The facility Administration failed to ensure an effective system to monitor for adequate staffing to provide Resident #6 needed care to prevent feelings of helplessness and pain from prolonged exposure to diarrhea for 3 hours while unable to obtain assistance. Residents #4 and #7 needed care including incontinent care and repositioning on 1/23/2025 for an unknown amount of time. 2. The facility Administration failed to ensure an effective monitoring system for adequate staffing to provide showers to Residents #1, #2, #3, #4 #5, #6, #7,#8 and #11 in compliance with their shower schedules. These failures placed residents at risk of inadequate supervision, an unsafe environment, skin breakdowns, falls and serious harm.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for two of eight (Resident #1 and Resident #2) residents reviewed for quality of care. 1. The facility failed to provide urostomy (a surgical procedure that creates an alternate pathway for urine to leave the body though an artificial opening on the abdomen) bags for Resident #1.2. The facility failed to provide tracheostomy (a surgical hole created through the neck to the trachea to assist with breathing) inner cannulas (a removable tube within a tracheostomy that helps keep the airway clear of mucus and debris) and Enemeez (a docusate sodium mini enema used to treat constipation) for Resident #2.These failures placed residents at risk of injury, infection, not receiving adequate care and services, and decreased quality of life.Findings include:Review of Resident #1's admission record, dated 05/06/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old male…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to heal pressure injuries for one resident (Resident #2) out of four residents reviewed for pressure injuries.The facility failed to assess the wound to Resident #2's sacrum (the triangular area at the base of the spine fused between the hips) and acquire orders upon admission on [DATE] until 04/08/2026. This failure could place residents at risk of worsening wounds, infections and pain. Findings included:Review of Resident #2's admission record, dated 05/06/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged to the hospital on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: quadriplegia (a condition that causes paralysis in all four limbs), paralytic syndrome (a medical condition characterized by partial or complete loss of muscle function due to nerve or neurological impairment), and other reduce mobility. Review of Resident #2's comprehensive admission MDS,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for one (Resident #1) of two residents reviewed for medication administration, in that: The facility failed to ensure they administered Resident #1 a one-time order, dated 12/10/25, of 500 ml of Sodium Chloride 0.9%. Resident #1 instead received approximately 900 ml of Sodium Chloride 0.9%. Resident #1 was sent to the hospital for SOB, and returned the same day with a diagnosis of pneumonia, no fluid overload. The failure placed residents at risk for fluid overload, shortness of breath, blood pressure issues, physical injury to organ failure. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 12/18/25, revealed a seventy-six-year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Her admitting diagnoses included acute combined systolic (congestive) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received care, consistent with professional standards of care to prevent development or promote wound healing for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility failed to provide treatments on from 10/03/2025 thru 10/09/2025 to a skin tear on Resident #1's shin on the right lower leg. This failure could place residents at risk for worsening skin concerns leading to discomfort, pain, and potential infections. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 09/16/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included type 2 diabetes (a chronic condition where the body either does not use insulin properly or does not produce enough insulin, leading to high blood sugar levels), unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety (memory loss, difficulty with communication,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature controls, and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keysfor 1 of 3 medication carts (Medication Cart #1) reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to prevent Medication Cart #1 was locked and medications were secure and not accessible to other staff, residents, or visitors. This failure could place residents at risk of having unauthorized access to prescriptions, biologicals, and over-the counter medications. Findings included: Observation on 10/28/2025 at 2:37 AM revealed an unlocked medication cart #1 in front of one of one nurses' station. RN C was sitting behind the nurse's station. Interview on 10/28/2025 at 2:40 AM RN C stated she did not realize the medication cart was unlocked. She stated all medication carts were to be locked except when a nurse was obtaining medications from the cart. RN C stated if a resident did ingest medications the resident was allergic to there was a possibility the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-03 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodations of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other residents for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3 call light was within reach on 06/03/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of their needs not being met. Findings include: Record review of Resident #3's admission record, dated 06/03/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #3 had diagnoses which included: unspecified dementia severity without behavioral disturbance psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety (memory loss and thinking difficulties), major depressive disorder (mental health condition characterized by persistent feelings of sadness, loss of interest, and reduce…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for bathing. The facility failed to provide showers to Resident #1 and Resident #2 in compliance with her shower schedule. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of decline in skin integrity and overall health. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission record, dated 06/03/2025, reflected an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung disease that makes it difficult to breathe), hyperlipidemia (having too much fat in your blood, specifically too much cholesterol and or triglycerides), heart failure (the heart isn't able to pump enough blood to meet the body's needs), primary generalized osteoarthritis (cartilage in joints start…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received care, consistent with professional standards of care to prevent development or promote wound healing for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility failed to provide treatments on 04/30/2025, 05/03/2025, and 05/05/2025 to a pressure ulcer on Resident #1's left heel. This failure could place residents at risk for worsening pressure ulcers leading to discomfort, pain, and potential infections. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated, 05/15/2025, reflected an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included cellulitis of left lower limb (a bacterial skin infection affecting the deeper layers of the skin and the tissue beneath it in the left leg), pressure ulcer of left heel, stage 4 (the most severe type, characterized by deep tissue damage, potentially exposing muscles, tendons, or bone), type 2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-04-23 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, including information for agency and contract staff, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data in a uniform format according to specifications established by CMS for fiscal year 2025 for the first quarter (October 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024) reviewed for one of one facility administration reviewed. The facility failed to submit PBJ (Payroll Based Journal) staffing information to CMS for October 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. This failure could place all residents at risk for personal needs not being identified and met, decreased quality of care, decline in health status, and decreased feelings of well-being within their living environment. Findings Included: Record review of the CMS PBJ report for CMS FY Quarter 1 2025 (October 1, 2024-December 31, 2024) indicated the facility failed to submit data for the quarter. In an interview on 4/21/25 at 9:49 AM with ADM and RCN revealed ADM and RCN stated that they were aware the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 9 of 23 residents (Resident # 6, #15, #17, # 24, # 28, #45, # 66, #72, #76) reviewed for ADL care. The facility failed to provide showers as scheduled for Residents # 6, #15, #17, # 24, # 28, #45, # 66, #72, and #76. This failure could place residents who were unable to carry out ADLs independently, at risk of skin breakdown, pain, and infection. Findings included: 1. Record review of face sheet dated 4/22/25 for Resident # 6 reflected she was an [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (a condition where the lungs fail to adequately oxygenate the blood, leading to low blood oxygen levels), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing food or liquids), type 2 diabetes (a long term condition in which the body has trouble…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 13 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-23 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident and determined by considering the number, acuity, and diagnoses of the facility's resident population with accordance with 9 (Residents #6, #11, #24,#28, #45, #66, #72, #73, #76) of 20 residents reviewed for sufficient staffing. The facility failed to ensure the facility had sufficient staffing to meet the needs of Residents #6, #11, #24, #28, #45, #66, #72, #73, #76. This failure could place the residents at risk of resident's needs, safety, and psychosocial well-being not being met. Findings included: 1. Record review of the face sheet dated 4/22/25 for Resident # 6 reflected she was an [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (a condition where the lungs fail…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen. 1. The facility failed to discard a ham expired 04/16/2025 containing ice particles in the plastic ziplog bag. 2. The facility failed to ensure an opened bag of rolls were properly sealed, labeled, and dated. These failures could place residents at risk for food borne illness. The findings included: Observation on 04/ 21/2025 at 9:00 AM revealed a ham which was not in the original packing and stored in a freezer bag with an expiration date of 04/16/2025 and filled with ice particles. Observation on 04/21/2025 at 9:00Am revealed a 24-count package of rolls in the freezer, unsealed, and not labeled. An interview on 04/22/25 at 03:06 PM the DM stated she was not aware of expired ham and rolls that were opened and not labeled in freezer or she would have thrown it in the trash. She stated it was every kitchen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-23 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choices for one (Resident #48 ) of six residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to promote and facilitate Residents #48's self-determination by not providing the resident with the support needed to get out of bed daily. This failure could place the resident at risk of feelings of depression, lack of self-determination and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Review of Resident #48's face sheet on 4/22/2025, revealed an [AGE] year-old female resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included unspecified sequelae of cerebral infarction (a condition that occurs after a stroke), muscle weakness, abnormal posture, anemia, muscle wasting and atrophy, hyperlipidemia (abnormally high levels of fats in the blood), depression, generalized anxiety disorder, and hemiparesis (one-sided muscle weakness resulting from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-23 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident had a right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his or her personal and medical records for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for medical record confidentiality. The facility failed to ensure the ADON kept Resident #1's medical information confidential. This failure could place residents at risk of their medical information being provided to unauthorized personnel, other residents, or visitors. Findings include: Record review of the undated Face Sheet for Resident #1 reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Type 2 Diabetes (long-term condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar and using it for energy) without complications. Record review of the Comprehensive MDS for Resident #1 dated 02/17/2025 reflected he had a BIMS score of 5 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Observation on 04/22/2025 from 8:10 AM until 8:13 AM revealed the ADON…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing and mental and psychosocial needs for two (Resident #14 and Resident #48) of six residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. 1. The facility included anticoagulant therapy on the residents' care plans without a recommendation or order for such. 2. The facility failed to include ordered antiplatelet therapy on the residents' care plans. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk of not receiving appropriate interventions and care to meet their current needs. Findings included: Review of Resident #14's face sheet on 4/22/2025, revealed a [AGE] year-old female resident receiving hospice services, who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included senile degeneration of the brain, cognitive communication disorder, polycythemia vera (a rare…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 1 medication room reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure an expired medication was removed from the medication storage room. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving an expired medication, not reaching the intended therapeutic dose and possible exacerbation of health conditions. Findings included: Observation on 04/21/2025 at 3:50 PM in the medication storage room across from the nurse stations revealed a bottle of Glucosamine and Chondroitin with an expiration date of 3/2025. In an interview on 04/21/2025 at 4:03 PM the RCN stated expired medications could potentially not be as effective and could lead to harm In an interview on 04/23/2025 at 10:38 AM the MR/CS/CNA C stated she had worked for the company for almost seven years and had been at the facility since…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-23 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the drug regimen review recommendations from the pharmacy consultant were received and acted upon for 1 (Resident # 58) of 4 residents reviewed for drug regimen review. The facility failed to follow up on pharmacy consultant recommendations dated 1/28/25 for Resident # 58. These failures could place residents being at risk for medication errors, unnecessary medications, and incorrect administration. Findings included: Record review of admission a face sheet dated 4/23/25 for Resident # 58 reflected a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with a diagnoses of dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning), type 2 diabetes (a long term condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar and using it for energy), atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rate), cognitive communication deficit (difficulties in communication caused by problems with cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to properly store, label, and/or secure medications and biologicals for 1 of 2 medication carts. The facility failed to ensure the medication aide cart for A hall was locked when unattended by CMA J on [DATE] from 07:15 AM until 07:43 AM. These failures could place residents at risk of harm due to unauthorized access and potential ingestion of medication, needles, and other biologicals. These failures could also place residents at risk of receiving an expired medication, not reaching the intended therapeutic dose and possible exacerbation of health conditions. Findings included: Observations on [DATE] from 7:15 AM until 7:43 AM revealed a medication cart on A Hall intermittently left unlocked, facing the hallway, and unattended by CMA J as she went into rooms and dispensed medications to the residents on the hall. In an interview on [DATE] at 12:06 PM CMA J stated she was a prn employee who had not worked at the facility for one month. She…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 (Resident #13) of 15 residents reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure TN, MDSC B, DON performed appropriate Enhanced Barrier Precaution steps while providing wound care to Resident #13. This deficient practice could place residents in the facility at risk for infections that could lead to other facility-acquired infections, delayed wound healing, sepsis, and hospitalizations. Findings included: Record review of the undated Face Sheet for Resident #13 reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Multiple Sclerosis (disease in which the immune system eats away at the protective covering of nerves), and pressure induced deep tissue damage of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, personal and oral hygiene for nine (Resident #1, #2, #3, #4 #5, #6, #7, #8 and #11) of eleven residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to provide showers to Residents #1, #2, #3, #4 #5, #6, #7,#8 and #11 in compliance with their shower schedules. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of a decline in hygiene, at risk of skin breakdown, level of satisfaction with life, and feelings of self-worth. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #1's, undated, face sheet reflected an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a readmission on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included chronic (persisting) kidney disease, major depressive disorder (depressed mood), low back pain and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 12/08/24,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature controls for 1 of 2 (100/200 hall cart) medication carts reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed when RN A did not ensure the 100/200 medication carts was locked and medications were secured and not accessible to other staff, residents, or visitors when not in use on 10/16/2024. These failures could place residents at risk of injury and result in residents not receiving doses of medication as well as not being maintained at their best therapeutic level. Findings included: An observation and interview on 10/16/24 at 3:09 PM a medication cart in the 100 hallway was observed unattended against the wall with the drawer's facing outward. The cart was not secured, and the drawers were easily opened revealing various routine medications and other items. Approximately 2-3 minutes later RN A was observed opening the door and coming out of room [ROOM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure nurse staffing data was posted daily and readily accessible to residents and visitors with all required information for 3 (08/26/2025, 08/27/2025, 08/28/2025) of 4 days reviewed for nurse staffing posting.The facility failed to post the daily staffing information in a prominent place on 08/26/2025, 08/27/2025, and 08/28/2025. This failure could place residents, families, and visitors at risk of not being informed of the census and number of staff working each day to provide care on all shifts. Findings:During an observation on 08/28/2025 at 9:06 am, revealed the nursing staffing information posted outside out the DON's office was dated 08/25/2025.During an interview with the DON on 08/29/2025 at 2:30 PM, the DON stated she was responsible for posting the nursing staffing information. The DON stated she had not posted the nursing staff information since 08/25/2025. The DON stated the residents would not be affected by the nursing information not being posted. The DON stated the nursing staffing show…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2025-04-23 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to post the daily nurse staffing data at the beginning of each shift in a prominent place, readily accessible to residents and visitors that included the facility name; and the total number of hours worked per shift by the registered nurses, the licensed vocational nurses, and the certified nurse aides directly responsible for resident care for the facility for 1 of 1 days reviewed for staffing postings. The facility failed to post current daily staffing information on 04/22/2025. This failure could place the residents, families, and visitors at risk of not having access to information regarding the number of staff working each day to provide care on all shifts. Findings included: In an interview and observation on 04/22/25 at 5:00 PM the ADM stated and showed the state surveyor an empty plastic notice holder outside the DON office, was where the staff posting should be located. In an interview on 04/22/2025 at 5:02 PM, the DON stated staffing should be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$39,676 in federal fines across 4 penalties.

  • $12,438 — penalty dated 2026-03-02
  • $17,345 — penalty dated 2025-12-09
  • $6,112 — penalty dated 2025-08-29
  • $3,781 — penalty dated 2025-01-26

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CREATIVE SOLUTIONS IN HEALTHCARE — 149 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.7-1.7 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.1-0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.2-1.2 vs chain
The other 148 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)
1 of 5Afton Oaks Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterHouston, TX 1 of 5Arlington Heights Health and Rehabilitation CenterFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Beltline Healthcare CenterGarland, TX 1 of 5Bluebonnet Nursing & RehabilitationKarnes City, TX 1 of 5Bluebonnet Point WellnessBullard, TX 1 of 5Brentwood Terrace Healthcare And RehabilitationParis, TX 1 of 5Buena Vida Nursing and Rehab-San AntonioSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Cottonwood Nursing & RehabilitationDenton, TX 1 of 5Countryview Nursing & RehabilitationTerrell, TX 1 of 5Dogwood Trails ManorWoodville, TX 1 of 5Downtown Health and Rehabilitation CenterFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Estates Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Fair Park Health & Rehabilitation CenterDallas, TX 1 of 5Five Points at Lake Highlands Nursing and RehabDallas, TX 1 of 5Five Points of PflugervillePflugerville, TX 1 of 5Franklin Heights Nursing & RehabilitationEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Gilmer Nursing & RehabilitationGilmer, TX 1 of 5Grace Pointe Wellness CenterEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Graham Oaks Care CenterGraham, TX 1 of 5Granbury Care CenterGranbury, TX 1 of 5Greenhill VillasMount Pleasant, TX 1 of 5Heritage At Longview Healthcare CenterLongview, TX 1 of 5Huebner Creek Health & Rehabilitation CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Interlochen Health and Rehabilitation CenterArlington, TX 1 of 5Kenedy Health & RehabilitationKenedy, TX 1 of 5Kennedy Health & RehabLufkin, TX 1 of 5Lake Lodge Nursing & RehabilitationLake Worth, TX 1 of 5Lampstand Nursing and RehabilitationBryan, TX 1 of 5Lancaster Nursing & RehabilitationLancaster, TX 1 of 5Marine Creek Nursing & RehabilitationFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Mesa Vista Inn Health CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Mountain View Health & RehabilitationEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Navasota Nursing & RehabilitationNavasota, TX 1 of 5Normandy Terrace Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5North Pointe Nursing and RehabilitationWatauga, TX 1 of 5Park Place Care CenterGeorgetown, TX 1 of 5Parkview Manor Nursing and RehabilitationWeimar, TX 1 of 5Peach Tree PlaceWeatherford, TX 1 of 5Pebble Creek Nursing CenterEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Pecan Tree Rehab And Healthcare CenterGainesville, TX

Showing 40 of 148; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
HUGGINS, LINDAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2024
BLAKE, GARYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2024
CLANTON, AUSTONIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
EAMIGUEL, CHRISTOPHERIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2024
CREATIVE SOLUTIONS IN HEALTHCARE INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2024
WILLIG, ZACHARYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2024
COLLEGE STATION SKILLED PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/20/2025
BLAKE, MALISAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2024
GRILLO, KELLYIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 02/20/2025
KOTHMANN, KRYSTAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 02/20/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

CMS lists this home as Medicare-certified only — it is not Medicaid-certified, so it generally cannot accept Medicaid as payment for a long-term stay. That makes it one of roughly 545 homes nationally where a Medicaid-funded placement is not an option. If you expect to rely on Medicaid, ask the home directly before you tour, and see the Texas Medicaid page for homes that do.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 745051. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next