Five Points at Lake Highlands Nursing and Rehab
315 East 19th Street, Dallas, TX 75238 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 280 certified beds · (214) 355-3300 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (53) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $58,149 in federal fines (most recent 2025-12-11)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (64%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 21.3% | 15.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.9% | 3.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.1% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 6.3% | 2.4% | 6.5% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.0% | 3.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 22.5% | 14.0% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 10.2% | 18.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.7% | 3.8% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 12.9% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 7.1% | 9.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.5% | 1.5% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 88.0% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 18.3% | 25.7% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 6.7% | 12.3% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.37 | 2.17 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.79 | 2.06 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
25.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 51 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 48.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 27 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 60% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 25.4%CMS range 15.3–40.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.8%CMS range 7.3–15.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 48.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 59.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 33.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 44.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 6.7% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.9%CMS range 3.5–12.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.30 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 280 beds and averages 173.8 residents a day — about 62% occupied, or roughly 106 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.36 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.13 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.87 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.56 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 64% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
53 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible and failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and put measures in place to prevent Resident #1 who was at risk for eloping from the facility. On 09/29/25, Resident #1 eloped out of the facility and was found in a nearby hospital about 12 hours later. Resident #1 retuned back to the facility and continued on one-to-one supervision. The noncompliance was identified as Past Non-compliance (PNC). The Immediate jeopardy (IJ) began on 09/29/25 and ended on 09/30/25. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. These failures could place residents at risk of potential accidents, injuries, harm, or death.Findings include: Review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-09-19 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide and document sufficient preparation and orientation of resident to ensure safe and orderly transfer or discharge from the facility and ensure the orientation was provided in a form and manner that the resident could understand for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for discharge. The facility failed on 8/21/2025 to ensure Resident #1's post-discharge destination and continued care provider could meet Resident #1's needs in that Resident #1 did not go to the Resident Representative's (RP) home, Resident #1 was taken to another family members residence because Resident #1 RP couldn't care for her due to work schedule and on or about 25 or 26 August 2025 Resident #1's RP obtained an order of protective custody for Resident #1 and Resident #1 was arrested and taken to a psychiatric hospital.This failure could place residents at risk of being discharged without preparation, causing a disruption in their care and place the residents at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-07-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and records review the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and transferred in a safe manner to prevent an accident for one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for accidents and hazards, in that: The facility failed to provide Resident #1 with adequate supervision and assistance with transfers to prevent an accident. On 05/14/25, Resident #1 had an unexpected or unintentional incident, which resulted in an injury to her left knee when transferred by two CNAs from the bed to a dialysis chair. On 05/19/25, the facility sent Resident #1 to the hospital after an x-ray of the bilateral (both) knees, dated 05/16/25 , revealed a possible acute nondisplaced fracture (the bone did not move when the fracture occurred) . follow-up x-rays or CT scan is recommended. On 05/19/25, Resident #1 had surgery to her left distal femur (lower part of thighbone, located just above the knee joint) to repair the fracture. An IJ was identified on 06/20/2025 at 1:30PM.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-06-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible and that residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for one (Resident #1) of four resident reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was adequately supervised to prevent her from leaving the facility unsupervised. There was a door near the secure unit that did not have an audible alarm. It was determined the noncompliance was identified as a Past Noncompliance Immediate Jeopardy (IJ). The IJ began on 06/01/2024 and ended on 06/02/2024. The facility corrected the noncompliance before the investigations began. This failure placed residents at risk for harm and/or serious injury. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 05/22/2024, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old-female who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident had diagnoses which included: Heart…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-10-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure that a resident receives care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers and does not develop pressure ulcers unless the individual's clinical condition demonstrates that they were unavoidable; and a resident with pressure ulcers receives necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility failed to appropriately identify the Resident #1's pressure ulcers, obtain and provide appropriate treatment, monitor the wounds, and provide interventions to prevent further deterioration of the wounds. Resident #1 was hospitalized and had sugery for osteomyelitis (bacterial infection in the bone) of the bone/joint of the right hip. This failure could place residents with wounds at an increased and unnecessary risk of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene for 1 of 4 residents (Resident#1) reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had her fingernails cleaned and trimmed on 05/26/26. This failure could place residents at risk for loss of dignity, risk for infections, and a decreased quality of life. A record review of Resident #1's annual MDS assessment, dated 02/21/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnosis which included: hypertension (elevated blood pressure), type 2 diabetes mellitus (elevated blood sugar), non-Alzheimer's dementia (brain disorders causing cognitive decline due to factors other than Alzheimer's), and multiple sclerosis (a chronic autoimmune disease of the central nervous system in which the immune…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-31 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to review and revise the person-centered comprehensive care plan for 1 (Resident #55) of 7 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plan revisions.The facility failed to revise Resident #55's comprehensive care plan to include a diagnosis of dementia.This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving appropriate interventions to meet their current health needs.Record review of Resident #55's face sheet, printed 03/31/26, reflected an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included dementia (decline in mental function) developed 03/20/24, acute kidney failure (sudden loss of kidney function), heart failure (heart muscle doesn't pump blood and oxygen to support other organs), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (progressive, treatable lung disease), and age-related osteoporosis (brittle and fragile bones due to loss of bone density).Record review of Resident #55's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 03/09/26,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-31 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary services for residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 7 residents (Resident #2, #12, #24, #91, #126, #144, and #156) of 10 residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to ensure: Resident #24, Resident #91, Resident #144 had their fingernails trimmed on 03/29/2026.Resident #126 had her fingernails trimmed and cleaned and facial hair trimmed on 03/29/2026.Resident #156 had his fingernails cleaned and trimmed on 03/29/2026.Resident #2 had her fingernails trimmed and cleaned on 03/29/2026.Resident #12 had his fingernails trimmed and cleaned on 03/29/2026 These failures could place residents who were dependent on staff for ADL care at risk for loss of dignity, risk for infections and skin breakdown, and a decreased quality of life.1. Record Review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] as a [AGE] year-old female with initial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-31 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food prepared that conserved nutritive value, flavor, and appearance for 6 residents (Resident #s 11,29,72,87,129, and 133) of 6 residents on pureed diet.Cook A failed to follow the recipe for the pureed potato salad served for lunch service on 03/30/26.This failure could place residents at risk of weight loss, altered nutritional status, and diminished quality of life. Findings included:Record Review of the facility's recipes to scale document for Monday, March 30, 2026, Lunch reflected, . Potato Salad,Yield :6 Serving Size: 1 # 8 Scoop . Instructions: .Place in a blender or food processor. Add liquid, if needed (example reserved juice, reserved liquid, or milk) to assist with pureeing. Puree with a blender or food processor until smooth. NOTE: Water should not be used as a liquid to puree foods. If needed, gradually add thickener. Serve: #8 scoop .Record Review of Resident diet roster dated 3/29/26 Lunch meal reflected, Resident #s 11, 29, 72, 87, 129, and 133 were on pureed texture diet.During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-31 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide each resident with at least three meals daily, at regular times comparable to normal mealtimes in the community or in accordance with resident needs, preferences, requests, and plan of care for 1 of 5 halls ( A1) reviewed for designated meal service times.The facility failed to provide lunch according to the designated meal service schedules on multiple occasions.This deficient practice could place residents at risk of low blood sugar levels, increased stress levels, slowed metabolism rates, weakened immune systems, malnutrition, weakened hearts, and organ failures.Record review of the facility's undated posted meal service reflected breakfast mealtime was 7:30 a.m., lunch mealtime was 12:30 p.m., and dinner mealtime was 5:30 p.m.During an observation on 03/29/2026 at 12:30 p.m., in the facility's dining room on hall A1, residents sat at tables for the lunch meal service. Observation revealed food trays arrived by staff at 1:25 p.m. and distributed. During an observation on 03/30/2026 at 12:30 p.m.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility's only kitchen in that:The facility failed to ensure food items in the kitchen were appropriately covered and food item discarded after the expiry date on 3/29/2026.These failures could affect residents who received their meals from the facility's kitchen, by placing them at risk for food-borne illness, if consumed and food contamination. Findings included:Observation on 03/29/2026 at 9:11 AM revealed approximately one half pitcher labeled as nectar thick water with a use by date of 03/26/26 was left in the walk in refrigerator.Observation on 03/29/2026 at 9:15 AM revealed multiple frozen sweet roll dough items and frozen beef steak fritters were stored in open cardboard boxes and left exposed to frigid air in the walk in freezer.In an interview and observation on 3/29/26 at 9:20 AM with Dietary Aide E, she stated that everyone in the kitchen was responsible for covering food items. She stated that usually dietary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that includes the services that attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 32 residents (Resident #87) who were reviewed for care planning. The facility failed to create a comprehensive care plan to maintain the placement of Resident #87's Scopolamine Base Patch (used to manage excessive drooling) as ordered by his physician. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk by not having their physician orders followed, choking on his saliva, and loss of dignity. Record review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #87 as a [AGE] year-old male initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #87's diagnoses included: non-Alzheimer's dementia, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, and lack of coordination. Review revealed Resident #87 had 0 for a BIMS score, which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-31 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care, including tracheostomy care, was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for one (Resident #89) of one resident reviewed for tracheostomy (a surgical opening in the neck providing a direct airway through the trachea) care. The facility failed to ensure RN D followed the procedure for tracheostomy care for Resident #89 on 03/30/26 by:Changing his gloves and performing hand hygiene before applying a clean trach drainage spongeUsing sterile technique when inserting the inner cannula into the resident's trach. These failures could place residents at risk for respiratory infections.Review of Resident #89's Comprehensive MDS assessment, dated 03/16/26, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her BIMS was 99 which meant Resident #89 was unable to complete the assessment interview. Her active diagnoses included acute…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-31 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 22 (Resident #112) residents observed for pharmacy services. CMA R failed to ensure Resident #112's medications were administered by leaving a cup containing medications on her bedside table for the resident to take later without supervision. This failure could place residents who received medications from CMA A by placing them at risk for medication errors and receiving less than therapeutic benefits from medications.Review of Resident #112's MDS assessment, dated 02/29/26, revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to facility on 02/29/26 with diagnoses included: Atrial Fibrillation or Other Dysrhythmias (Atrial fibrillation (AFib) is the most common form of arrhythmia), hypertension (high blood pressure), Diabetes Mellitus (elevated blood sugar), depression (a serious,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable for 1 of 6 medication carts observed for medications labeling and. The Hall C2 medication cart contained an insulin bottle of Lispro injection 100 unit/ml with no open date. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving the therapeutic benefit of the medication or adverse reaction to expired medication. During observation and interview on 03/30/26 at 1:47 PM, the medication cart for Hall C2 with LVN J, observation of top-drawer holding insulin, found an insulin bottle of Lispro insulin with no open date. LVN J stated she used the insulin bottle and gave Resident #2 her insulin doses at breakfast and lunch time administration. LVN J stated insulin expired 28 days after opening it and a negative outcome could be the medication loses potency and could be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 38 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of infection for 2 residents (Resident #140 and Resident #190) of 5 residents observed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure:CNA C changed gloves and completed hand hygiene during incontinent care for Resident #140 on 3/29/26.CNA Q performed hand hygiene while providing incontinence care to Resident #190 on 03/29/26. CNA P and CNA Q wore proper PPE while performing incontinent care for Resident#190 ,who was in enhanced barrier precautions for indwelling medical devices on 03/29/26. These failures could place residents at risk for infection and cross contamination of pathogens and illness.Resident # 140Record review of the Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #140 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses included cerebral infarction (a condition caused by a blockage in blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately notify the resident representative and the resident's physician, when there was significant change in resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status for one of eight (Resident #2) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure LVN K notified the RP and the physician when Residents #2 was hit with the door. On 11/24/25 LVN K entered Resident #2's room hitting him with the door, she failed to complete an incident report, document assessments completed, and any required ongoing monitoring for delay in injury and failed to notify the resident's responsible representative of the resident's broken dentures. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their responsible party, physician and oncoming staff notified of changes, which could result in a delay in medical intervention and a decline in health. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's Face Sheet dated 12/12/25 reflected an [AGE] year-old…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #3). The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's room was free from hazards. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of living in an unsafe environment which could lead to falls and injuries.Findings include: Record review of Resident #3's Face Sheet, dated 12/09/25, reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included muscle weakness and difficulty walking. Record review of Resident #3's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 9/01/25, reflected a BIMS score of 15, an intact cognitive response. For ADL care, it reflected the resident required substantial assistance. Record review of Resident #3's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 12/09/2025, reflected the resident was a risk for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #5) reviewed for ADL care provided to dependent residents. The facility failed to ensure Resident #5 received any of her scheduled showers based on records reviewed for November and December 2025. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene, skin integrity, or decreased self- esteem.Findings Included: Record review of Resident #5's Face Sheet, dated 12/09/25, reflected she was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included Cerebral Infarction impacting left dominant side (stroke) and reduced mobility. Record review of Resident #5's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 9/16/25, reflected a BIMS score of 14, an intact cognitive response. For ADL…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to obtain from hospice the hospice election form, hospice plan care, and physician certification and recertification of the terminal illness specific to the patient and failed to designate a member of the facility's interdisciplinary team who was responsible for working with hospice representatives to coordinate care to the resident for one of three (Resident #2) residents reviewed for hospice services. The facility failed to coordinate care between the facility and Hospice Agency J for Resident #2 at the time of her Respite stay from 11/22/25 through 11/26/25 which resulted in her not receiving her Hospice aide services from 11/24/25 through 11/26/25. These failures could place residents on hospice at risk of not having services coordinated between service providers.Findings included:Record review of Resident #2's Face Sheet dated 12/12/25 reflected an [AGE] year-old female with an admission date of 11/22/25. Her diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0914 — isolatedProvide bedrooms that don't allow residents to see each other when privacy is needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to be treated with respect and dignity for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for dignity. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4 had a privacy curtain. This deficient practice could place the resident at risk of not feeling as if they were being treated with dignity and respect while being fed.Findings include:Record review of Resident #4's Face Sheet, dated 12/09/25, reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included major depressive disorder and anxiety. Record review of Resident #4's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 11/19/25, reflected a BIMS score of 8, a moderate impairment. For ADL care, it reflected the resident required supervision or touching assistance. Record review of Resident #4's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 12/02/2025, reflected the resident had an impaired cognitive impairment and an intervention included providing the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary services for residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 1 resident (Resident #3) of 6 residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3 had his fingernails cleaned and trimmed on 11/06/25. This failure could place residents who were dependent on staff for ADL care at risk for loss of dignity, risk for infections, and a decreased quality of life. Record review of Resident #3's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #3 was an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included dehydration (occurs when the body loses more fluids than it takes in, leading to a depletion of water and electrolytes), coronary artery disease (a condition where the arteries that supply blood to the heart [coronary arteries] become narrowed or blocked), and benign prostatic hyperplasia (a non-cancerous…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #1, Resident #2) observed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure CMA A disinfected the blood pressure cuff in between blood pressure checks for Residents #1 and Resident #2 during a medication pass on 11/06/25. These failures could place residents at-risk of cross contamination which could result in infections or illness.Observations on 11/06/25 between 09:24 AM and 07:43AM revealed CMA A took a blood pressure cuff from the top of the medication cart, entered Resident #1's room, checked his blood pressure and put the blood pressure cuff back on the top of the medication carts without sanitizing it. CMA A gave Resident #1 his morning medications. CMA A moved the medication cart to the front of Resident #2's room. CMA A retrieved the blood pressure cuff from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene to residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living for one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for quality of life. The facility failed to assist Resident #2 with timely incontinence care . These failures could put residents at risk of poor personal hygiene, impaired skin integrity, and decreased feelings of self-worth and dignity. Findings included: A record review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #2 had history and diagnoses of Hemiplegia (complete paralysis of one side of the body) and Hemiparesis (involves weakness on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting right dominant side; Need for Assistance with Personal Care; Anxiety and MDD (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to assure that medications were secure and inaccessible to unauthorized staff and residents, for one (medication cart #1) of two medication carts observed for medication storage. On 06/09/25 at 7:53 AM, MT Q failed to ensure medications were secured or attended to by authorized staff when MT Q did not lock the medication cart (#1) before she walked away. This failure placed residents at risk of a potential for more than minimal harm if a resident accessed and ingested medications or drug diversion. Findings included: During an observation on 06/09/25 at 7:53 AM revealed a medication cart (#1) unlocked, unattended and not under direct observation of authorized staff. The lock was in the out position, and anyone could open the drawers and left the medications accessible. Various multi-dose bottles of OTC medications were organized in the top drawer of the medication cart. Residents' routine and PRN medications and medication blister packs were organized in other drawers of the medication cart. One resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-14 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents in 1 of 5 rooms observed. The metal vent cover was missing from the air conditioning opening in the ceiling. The built-in dresser was missing 4 dresser drawers and 2 dresser doors. This facility failure could place Residents at risk for an unsafe environment. Findings include: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 05/14/2025 revealed a [AGE] year-old admitted [DATE] with a readmission on [DATE]. Admitting diagnosis of Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypercapnia (the inability to adequately remove carbon dioxide from the blood, leading to elevating levels of CO2 in the blood (hypercapnia) ; Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with (Acute) Exacerbation (sudden worsening in airway function and respiratory symptoms in patients with COPD (a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe) ; Essential (Primary) Hypertension (high…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs in order attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for care plans. The facility did not put a floor mat for Resident #1 as indicated in his care plan as an intervention in the resident's care plan who was a high fall risk while he was in his bed on 05/14/25. This failure can put residents at risk for falls to sustain injuries due to not following interventions for fall precautions in place. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1 admission record dated, 05/14/25, revealed a [AGE] year-old male readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included Unspecified Parkinsonism (a progressive nervous system disorder, which affects the ability to move muscles and muscle spasms or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #10) reviewed for ADL care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #10 was provided showers as scheduled. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving services and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #10's admission record, dated 05/14/2025, revealed a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting right dominant side. Record review of Resident #10's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 04/29/2025, revealed a BIMS score of 14, indicating intact cognition. Further review of the MDS revealed Resident #10 required partial/moderate assistance in showering and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-14 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure personnel provide basic life support, including CPR, to a resident requiring such emergency care prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel and subject to related physician orders and the resident's advance directives for 1 of 4 (Emergency Response Cart 1) emergency crush carts reviewed for emergency preparedness. Facility failed to check inventory daily on an Emergency Response Cart 1 on C hallway from [DATE] to [DATE]. These failures could place residents at risk for delayed emergency response care. The findings included: Review of Emergency Response Cart 1's daily log inventory check off on [DATE] at 09:46 AM, revealed no check off was completed from [DATE] to [DATE] on Emergency Response Cart 1. Further review of the daily Emergency Response Cart 1 inventory log revealed it was also incomplete for [DATE] with the following items not checked off; Kling (a type of gauze bandage), blood pressure cuff, stethoscope, K-Y-…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement their written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident's property for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for injuries of unknown origin. The facility staff failed to report an injury of unknown origin to the abuse and neglect coordinator when Resident #1 sustained a large bruise to her right and left eyes and laceration to her right eyebrow. This failure could place the residents at risk for further potential abuse due to unreported and uninvestigated allegations of abuse, neglect, and injuries of unknown origin. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet dated 01/23/25 reflected Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1's active diagnoses included Huntington's disease (a condition that leads to progressive degeneration of nerve cells in the brain that affects…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including the procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for medications and pharmacy services. The facility failed to take Resident #1's blood pressure and administer her medication in accordance with the physician orders. Resident #1 was administered Propranolol (a beta blocker medication that relaxes blood vessels in the body is used to treat a variety of conditions including high blood pressure) three times a day from 12/01/24 through 01/18/25. The medication was only to be given if her blood pressure was over 110/60. However, there was no documented evidence to indicate her blood pressure was taken in her clinical record to validate the medication needed to be given and did not need to be held. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen safety. 1. The facility failed to ensure food in the facility's dry storage, refrigerator, and freezer areas were labeled and dated according to guidelines. 2. The facility failed to seal open items in plastic bags in the dry storage pantry, refrigerator, and freezer areas. 3. The facility failed to ensure that expired items in the dry storage pantry, refrigerator and freezer areas were removed. These deficient practices could affect residents who received meals and/or snacks from the main kitchen and place them at risk for cross contamination and other air-borne illnesses. Findings Included: Observation of the kitchen during the brief initial tour of the kitchen on 12/08/24 at 9:33 AM, revealed the following: Dry storage area *One box of twenty-five 4 fl. oz. of thickened unflavored water that expired on 11/27/24, *One box of thirty-eight 4 fl. oz. of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for three (Resident #104, Resident #62, and Resident #89) of nine residents observed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA D performed hand hygiene while providing incontinence care to Resident #104. 2. The facility failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions for Resident #62 and Resident #89. These failures placed residents at risk for healthcare associated cross contamination and infections. Findings included: 1. Record Review of Resident #104's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 08/17/24, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's BIMs score was 5 indicating the resident's cognition was severely impaired. The resident was dependent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and interviews the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior for one (Resident #98) of five residents reviewed for environment. The facility failed to ensure Resident #98's windowsill was repaired after it was broken leaving damaged wood and debris exposed to the room. This failure could place residents at risk for a diminished quality of life due to the lack of a homelike environment. Findings included: Record review of Resident #98's admission Record dated 12/8/24 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of resident #98's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected she was rarely or never understood and had severe cognitive impairment. Her diagnoses included kidney failure, pneumonia, aphasia (inability to speak), respiratory failure, stroke, seizure disorder, and anoxic brain damage (caused by lack of oxygen to the brain. She was fed by a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-10 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure all Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) level 1 residents with mental illness were provided with a PASARR level 2 evaluation for 7 of 10 residents (Resident #104, Resident #82, Resident #5, Resident #14, Resident #21, Resident #64's, and Resident #76), reviewed for resident assessment. Resident #104, Resident #21, Resident #64, and Resident #76 PASARR's level 1 screening form did not reflect mental illness and the residents did not have a PASARR level II evaluation. Resident #82 was not referred to the Local Mental Health Authority (LMHA) for PASARR Level 2 screening. Resident #5 and Resident #14 did not have a PASARR level 1 or 2 evaluation completed. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving necessary specialized services to meet their individual needs. The findings were: Resident #104 Record review of Resident #104's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 08/17/24, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident to meet the resident's medical and nursing needs for one (Resident #57) of four reviewed care plans. The facility failed to develop a care plan to address Resident #57 smoking. This failure could place residents who smoke at harm due to not completing safe smoking assessment. Findings included: Review of Resident #57's quarterly MDS Resident Assessment, dated 10/03/24, revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His active diagnoses included Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, Malnutrition, Asthma, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. MDS revealed Resident #57's ADLs related to going from sitting to standing, transferring from chair to bed and back to chair, and walking 50 feet with 2 turns requiring Moderate Assistance helper does less than half the effort in lifting, and supporting resident's trunk. Review of Resident #57's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for one (Resident #104) of four residents reviewed for ADL care. 1. The facility failed to provide Resident #104 with thorough incontinence care on 12/08/24. This failure could place residents at risk for a skin breakdown and infection. Findings included: 1. Record Review of Resident #104's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 08/17/24, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's BIMs score was 5 indicating the resident's cognition was severely impaired. The resident was dependent on staff for all personal hygiene. The resident was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Her diagnoses included non-Alzheimer's dementia, muscle weakness, and lack of coordination. Record review of Resident #104's Care Plans, revised…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-10 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed ensure that a resident who was incontinent of bowel received appropriate treatment and services to restore as much normal bowel function as possibleto for 1 (Resident #104) of 4 residents reviewed for incontinence care. 1. CNA D failed to clean Resident #104's peri-area during incontinence care provided on 12/08/24. These deficient practices affect residents who depend on nursing care and could place residents at risk for infection and harm. The findings included: 1. Record Review of Resident #104's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 08/17/24, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's BIMs score was 5 indicating the resident's cognition was severely impaired. The resident was dependent on staff for all personal hygiene. The resident was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Her diagnoses included non-Alzheimer's dementia, muscle weakness, and lack of coordination. Record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable on one of five carts the medication cart. Medication cart contained an insulin pen of Humalog open with no open date. This failure could place residents receiving medications at risk for drug diversion, drug overdose, and accidental or intentional administration to the wrong resident which could lead to exacerbation of their disease process and deterioration in general health. Findings include: During observation/interview on 12/11//24 at 02:10 PM of the medication cart with LVN A, observation of top-drawer holding insulin, found an insulin pen of Humalog insulin with no open date. LVN A stated insulin expired 28 days after opening it and a negative outcome could be the medication loses potency and could be ineffective. During an interview on 12/10/24 at 03:29 PM with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-10 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received food prepared in a from designed to meet individual needs for one (Resident #6) of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition services. The facility failed to ensure the lunch meal served to Resident #6 on 12/08/24 had the appropriate consistency for the meat serving for the mechanical soft diet. The deficient practice could affect residents who received mechanical soft meals from the kitchen by contributing to choking, poor intake, and/or weight loss. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #6's annual MDS assessment, dated 11/13/24, reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His BIMS score was 13 which indicated his cognitive status was intact. The resident required supervision for eating. His diagnoses included difficulty swallowing and respiratory failure. The resident required a mechanically altered diet. Record review of Resident #6's care plans, dated 08/29/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to have housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior for one (Hall 300) of three halls and five residents (Residents #2, #5, #6, #7 and #8) of 13 residents reviewed for safe clean environment. 1.The facility failed to ensure the housekeeping and nursing departments cleaned the Sit to stand mechanical lift on the 300 hall. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's bed frame, G-tube machine, wall, and light fixture was thoroughly cleaned and repaired a large hole in the wall next to the headboard of her bed. 3.The facility failed to ensure the housekeeping and nursing departments cleaned Residents #5, #6, #7, # 8's wheelchairs. 4. The facility failed to ensure Resident #8's room was cleaned properly and free from dust and debris particles. These failures could place residents at risk having a feeling of low self-esteem, respiratory and stomach issues and injury due inhaling…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to respect the resident's right to personal privacy for four (Residents #1, #2, #3 and #4) of 13 residents reviewed for confidentiality of records. The facility failed to ensure LVN A did not leave Residents #1, #2, #3, #4's medication blister packs on top of an unattended Medication cart while she was in Resident #4's room with the door closed. This failure could place residents at risk of having their medical information exposed causing HIPAA violations with their personal information being known to other residents and visitors, resulting in embarrassment, frustration, and decreased psycho-social well-being. The findings included: Observation on 12/05/24 at 11:37 am to 11:46 am, Residents #1, #2, #3 and #4's medication blister cards were on top of and unattended medication cart. It was in front of Resident #4's room and the door was closed. Record review of Resident #1's December 2024 MAR Printed 12/05/24 revealed, Letrozole Oral Tablet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 (Resident #8) of 13 residents reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure staff did not leave an unwrapped piston syringe (used to withdraw bodily fluids) to flush Resident #8's urinary catheter, was left on her dresser with her personal belonging around it. This failure could place residents at risk of getting sick with infections due to cross contamination which could result in a change in condition and decreased psycho-social well-being. Findings included: Observation on 12/05/24 at 12:14 pm revealed, Resident #8 was on EBP for a urinary catheter and wound on her sacral. There was a piston syringe and pack of gauze dressing on her dresser next to a basket of magazines and a toothbrush. There…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-18 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — patternProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to assist residents in obtaining routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for 4 out of 9 residents (Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #7 and Resident #8) reviewed for dental services. The facility failed to provide timely dental services for Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #7, and Resident #8 from December 2023 through May 17, 2024. This failure could place residents at risk of oral complications, dental pain, and diminished quality of life. Findings included: 1) Record review of Resident #3's face sheet showed a [AGE] year-old woman, who was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included: Chronic Osteomyelitis (a bone infection that occurs when an infection does not clear up after treatment), Paraplegia (leg paralysis), Congestive Heart Failure (chronic condition in which the heart does not pump blood as well as it should), Cerebral Infarction (occurs as a result of disrupted blood flow to the brain due to problems with blood vessels that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, for 5 of 9 residents (Residents #1, #2, #7, #8, #9) reviewed for environment. The facility failed to ensure Residents #1, #2, #7, #8, and #9 had hot water for washing and bathing in their rooms. This failure affected residents by placing them at risk for a diminished quality of life. Findings include: Record review of Resident's #1 Face Sheet dated 1-20-2024, showed a [AGE] year-old female who was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had a primary diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis with unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, calculus of kidney, muscle wasting and atrophy, and an unspecified disorder of the eyes. In an observation of Resident #1's bathroom on 1-20-2024 at 4:40PM, it was discovered that Resident #1 did not have hot water in her bathroom. Record review of Resident #2's Face Sheet dated 1-20-2024, showed a [AGE] year-old female with an admission date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide residents who were unable to carry out ADLs the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene for 6 of 9 residents (Residents #1, #2, #5, #7, #8, #9) reviewed for showers. The facility failed to ensure Residents #1, #2, #5, #7, #8, and #9 received showers as scheduled. This failure affected residents by placing them at risk for discomfort, diminished self-esteem, and decreased quality of life. Findings include: Record review of Resident's #1 Face Sheet dated 1-20-2024, showed a [AGE] year-old female who was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had a primary diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis with unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, calculus of kidney, muscle wasting and atrophy, and an unspecified disorder of the eyes. Record Review of Resident #1's Social Service Quarterly Assessment, dated 1-18-2024 revealed a BIMS Score of 13 which indicated little to no cognitive impairment and required extensive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to treat each resident with respect, dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality for 1 of 5 (Resident #1) observed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was treated with dignity and respect while being fed by a staff member. This failure can damage resident's self-esteem and self-worth causing negative psychosocial outcomes affecting their health. Findings include: Record review of Resident's #1 Face Sheet dated 1-20-2024, showed a [AGE] year-old female who was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had a primary diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis with unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, calculus of kidney (hard deposits made of minerals and salts that form inside your kidneys), muscle wasting and atrophy, and an unspecified disorder of the eyes. Record Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that the Resident's environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible; and each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 (Resident #1) of 9 residents reviewed for accidents. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had an environment free of accident hazards by not keeping her bed at a safe angle while being fed thereby preventing a choking hazard. This failure affected residents by placing them at risk for choking and aspiration. Findings include: Record review of Resident's #1 Face Sheet dated 1-20-2024, showed a [AGE] year-old female who was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had a primary diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis with unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, calculus of kidney, muscle wasting and atrophy, and an unspecified disorder of the eyes. Record Review of Resident #1's Social Service Quarterly Assessment, dated 1-18-2024 revealed a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 2 (Resident #11 and Resident #81) of 2 residents reviewed for accidents, hazards, and supervision. 1. The facility failed to ensure safe smoking for Resident #11 when he had a lighter and a pack of cigarette in his possession. 2. The facility failed to ensure safe smoking for Resident #81 when he had a lighter and a pack of cigarettes in his possession. This failure could place residents at risk for injury, burns and an unsafe smoking environment. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #81's face sheet dated 11/07/23 indicated Resident #81 was a [AGE] year-old male, with an original admission to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #81 had diagnoses which included dementia (group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking and social abilities) alcohol dependence, tobacco use, major depression, and difficulty in walking. Record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-07 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — patternHave policies on smoking.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to establish policies, in accordance with applicable Federal, State, and local laws and regulations, regarding smoking, smoking areas and smoking safety that also took into account nonsmoking residents for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #11, Resident #81) reviewed for safe smoking. The facility failed to develop a policy to address residents signing in and out on a Release of Responsibility for Leave of Absence form to smoke, which included Resident #11 and Resident #81. This failure could place residents at risk for injury, burns and an unsafe smoking environment. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #81's face sheet dated 11/07/23 indicated Resident #81 was a [AGE] year-old male, with an original admission to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #81 had diagnoses which included dementia (group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking and social abilities) alcohol dependence, tobacco use, major depression, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-07 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who were fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to restore, if possible, oral eating skills and to prevent complications of enteral feeding including but not limited to aspiration pneumonia, diarrhea, vomiting, dehydration, metabolic abnormalities, and nasal pharyngeal ulcers for one of 3 residents (Resident #7) reviewed for enteral nutrition. LVN D failed to check for residual volume prior to medication administration. This failures could place residents at risk for metabolic abnormalities, medical complications, or a decline in health. Findings included: Record review of Resident #7's face sheet, dated 07/07/23, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included Gastrostomy status (an opening in the stomach at the abdominal wall made surgically to introduce food), dysphasia (speech disorder) and cerebral palsy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-07 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was not five percent or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 11%, based on three out of 27 opportunities, which involved 2 of 5 residents (Resident #7 and Resident #75) reviewed for medication errors. 1. LVN D failed to administer medications as ordered to Resident #7 by administering Vitamin B-12 1000 mcg instead of Vitamin B-12 500 mg and administered Folic acid 800 mcg instead of 1mg. 2. LVN D failed to administer medication as ordered to Resident #75 by administering Levemir 18 units instead of Lantus 18 units. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving the desired therapeutic effect of their medications and uncontrolled pain. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #75's face sheet, dated 07/07/23, reflected a 71-years old female who was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #75 had diagnoses which included:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one of five residents (Resident #152) reviewed for infection control. 1. CNA A failed to complete hand hygiene while providing incontinent care to Resident #152. 2. The facility failed to ensure linens and trash were not on the floor in Resident #152's room and bathroom. These failures could place residents at risk for contamination and infection and foul smell in the rooms. The findings include: 1. Observation on 11/05/23 at 09:35 AM revealed there were linens on the floor and trash on the floor in room [ROOM NUMBER] and there was foul smell in the room. Observation on 11/05/23 at 12:50 PM revealed there were linens and a used brief on the floor in the bathroom. CNA A was in the bathroom collecting the linens.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$58,149 in federal fines across 5 penalties.
- $16,149 — penalty dated 2025-12-11
- $10,361 — penalty dated 2025-09-19
- $15,143 — penalty dated 2025-07-08
- $8,985 — penalty dated 2024-05-18
- $7,511 — penalty dated 2023-10-11
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CREATIVE SOLUTIONS IN HEALTHCARE — 149 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.7 | -1.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
The other 148 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 148; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| BOWERS, SEAN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 07/01/2024 |
| CISNEROS, ALFRED | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 02/18/2008 |
| COBB, TRAVIS | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 10/05/2022 |
| COOPER, STEPHEN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 11/22/2022 |
| HARDIN, SHERRIE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 09/04/2024 |
| KERZEE, RICHARD | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 09/24/2007 |
| KORENEK, PATRICIA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 05/05/2018 |
| SOECHTING, PAUL | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 11/22/2024 |
| STRACK, JOE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 02/11/2022 |
| HUGGINS, LINDA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 02/01/2023 |
| WILLIG, ZACHARY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2025 |
| THOMPSON, JOHNNY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/01/2024 |
| DALLAS I ENTERPRISES | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/15/2025 |
| BLAKE, GARY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2022 |
| BLAKE, MALISA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 09/01/2022 |
| FULLER, ELISE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2025 |
| SILVA, PHILLIP | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 86% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 455895. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-31, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.