No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Buena Vida Nursing and Rehab-San Antonio

5027 Pecan Grove, San Antonio, TX 78222 · Government - Hospital district · 222 certified beds · (210) 333-6815 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Flagged for abuse3 immediate-jeopardy citations2 immediate-jeopardy citations CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$174,889 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Oct 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (49) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $174,889 in federal fines (most recent 2026-02-13)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
Southcross · (210) 333-1255 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
3930 E Southcross Blvd · (210) 333-3700 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3203 S WW White Rd · (210) 337-1863 · Call to confirm hours
Place of worship
4115 E Southcross Blvd · (210) 333-3310

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased34.3%15.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.2%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.7%2.4%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.6%3.3%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened36.9%14.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication16.9%18.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.5%3.8%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control19.0%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.8%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.5%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%88.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission4.2%25.7%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.4%12.3%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.402.171.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.772.061.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.46U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.21hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 77% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.581.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.27
RN hours/ resident / day
1.03
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.63
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.93
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.23
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 222 beds and averages 66.9 residents a day — about 30% occupied, or roughly 155 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.93 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.27 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.63 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.66 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.04 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.28 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-29)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-12)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

49 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible; and to ensure resident receives adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents and hazards in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's environment was free of hazards and Resident #1 was adequately monitored. On 2/4/2026 Resident #1 told CNA A she wanted to kill herself. Resident #1 was discovered harming herself by cutting her right wrist with a shaving razor on 2/5/2026. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 2/4/2026 and ended on 2/8/2026. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could result in residents experiencing suicidal ideations being at risk for harm, injuries, and death. The Findings:Record review of Resident #1's admission Record dated 2/5/2026 revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of mild cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident receives adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 11 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received adequate supervision and did not elope from the facility on 9/05/2025 at approximately 6:15 PM until he was returned to the facility by a visitor at 6:45 PM. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 9/05/2025 at approximately 6:15 PM and ended on 9/06/2025 at 5:30 PM. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. The failure could place residents at-risk of injury or death due to not being adequately supervised. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 1/13/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included dementia (a progressive disorder that affects memory, reasoning, and other cognitive processes), adjustment disorder…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2025-10-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from neglect for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for neglect in that: 1. Resident #1 was not provided wound care daily to the left ankle or skin assessments by facility nursing staff from 08/28/2025 - 09/24/2025. Resident #1 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] for osteomyelitis and had to have a left BKA. 2. Resident #1 went for approximately one month without adequate treatment for wounds which led to infection and right BKA. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was provided with wound care to a surgical wound on the resident's right leg. 4. The ADON failed to ensure wound care treatment orders were added to Resident #1's EMR. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 10/04/2025. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 12:35 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 10/06/2025 the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-10-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents with surgical wounds received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing, for 1 of 8 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for surgical wounds in that: Resident #1 did not have weekly skin assessments during the month of September 2025, did not receive care to the right surgical wound as ordered by the physician and was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] with an infection to Resident #1's right below the knee amputation. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 10/04/2025. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 12:35 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 10/06/2025 the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of no actual harm with the potential for more than minimal harm that is not IJ, due to the need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2025-10-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing, for 1 of 8 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for pressure ulcers in that: Resident #1 had a Stage IV pressure ulcer on his left ankle and did not have wound treatment orders in the month of September 2025. Resident #1 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] with osteomyelitis and had a left below the knee amputation on 09/25/2025. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 10/03/2025. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 4:53 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 10/06/2025 the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of no actual harm with the potential for more than minimal harm that is not IJ, due to the need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. These…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that are complete and accurately documented for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for medical records accuracy.The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's Nursing Assistant ADL Flow Sheets were accurately documented from 4/13/2026 to 5/12/2026.This failure could place residents at risk for an incomplete clinical picture and errors in care and treatment.The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 5/12/2026, revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: cerebral infarction (stroke), type 2 diabetes mellitus (body does not use insulin effectively), and need for assistance with personal care. Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 4/1/2026, revealed a BIMS score of 07 which indicated severe cognitive impairment. His functional abilities were supervision or touching assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 3 residents (Resident #2, Resident#3, and Resident #4) reviewed of 29 residents reviewed for pharmaceutical services. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #2's, Resident #3's, and Resident #4's narcotic sheets were labeled in way to account for all medications dispensed by pharmacy. This facility failure could affect residents who take narcotics for pain and could result in misappropriation of medications or drug diversion.The Findings Include: 1. Record review of Resident #2's admission Record, dated 03/04/2026, revealed resident was a [AGE] year-old male and admitted to facility on 06/25/2025 with diagnoses of Muscle Weakness (often sudden reduction in strength where muscles cannot exert expected force), Dementia (progress decline…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs for 4 of 11 residents (Residents #1, #2, #3, and #4) reviewed for comprehensive care planning. The facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care planning for assessed elopement risks of Residents #1, #2, #3, and #4. This failure could lead to residents not receiving necessary care and decreased quality of life. Findings included: 1.Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 1/13/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included dementia (a progressive disorder that affects memory, reasoning, and other cognitive processes), adjustment disorder (emotional or behavioral reactions to stressful life events), alcohol abuse, and psychosis (a loss of contact with reality). Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 of 8 residents (Resident # 5, 6 and 8) reviewed for infection control in that: Resident #5 had a foley catheter and did not have a sign for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP).Resident #6 had a foley catheter and was observed with her foley catheter tubing touching the floor under Resident #6's wheelchair.Resident #8 had a gastric tube and did not have a sign for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). This deficient practice could affect residents on enhanced barrier precautions and place them at risk for infection. The findings were: 11.Record review of Resident #5's undated face sheet revealed Resident #5 was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus type 2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-06 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure personal privacy for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #5) observed for foley catheters in that: Resident #5 was observed in bed with her foley bag attached to the side of the bed without a privacy cover, exposing her foley bag contents to the open bedroom door. This deficient practice could affect residents who have foley catheter bags and could result in loss of dignity and low self-esteem. The findings were: Record review of Resident #5's undated face sheet revealed Resident #5 was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus type 2 (high blood sugar levels), cerebral infarction (stroke) and hydronephrosis with renal and ureteral calculous obstruction (swelling of one or both kidneys causing a blockage or obstruction). Record review of Resident #5's MDS assessment, dated 08/12/2025, reflected Resident #5 had a BIMS score of 04, indicating severe cognitive impairment.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-29 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 4 of 6 residents (Resident #7, Resident #8, Resident #10, and Resident #35) who were reviewed for resident assessments. 1.The facility failed to document Resident #7's use of anticonvulsant medication on the quarterly MDS assessment. 2. The facility failed to accurately code Resident #8's hypoglycemic medication on the quarterly MDS assessment.3. The facility failed to document Resident #10's use of antiplatelet medication on the quarterly MDS assessment.4. The facility failed to accurately code Resident #35's diagnosis of bipolar disorder on the quarterly MDS assessment. This failure could place residents at risk of improper or incorrect care and services necessary for their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #7's admission sheet dated 10/16/2023 with an original date of 4/08/2020 documented a [AGE] year-old…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise the comprehensive care plan after each assessment for 5 of 6 residents (Residents #1, #4, #7, #10, and #35) reviewed for care planning. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's care plan was accurate to reflect that he was not a smoker.2. The Facility failed to ensure Resident #4's care plan reflected he was on dialysis. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #7's care plan was accurate and updated to reflect the type of psychoactive medications prescribed for Resident #7 and the specific side effect monitoring of those medications. 4. The facility failed to ensure Resident #10's care plan was accurate and updated to reflect the type of blood thinning medication Resident #10 was prescribed.5. The facility failed to ensure Resident #35's care plan was accurate and updated to reflect Resident #35's psychiatric diagnoses and psychoactive specific medication monitoring. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drug records were in order and that an account of all controlled drugs was maintained and periodically reconciled for 3 of 5 carts (2300/2400 hall nurse cart, 2300/2400 hall medication aide cart, and the 2200/2500 hall medication aide cart) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure the controlled substance reconciliation logs were signed for accuracy of medication quantities during shift change. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving their prescribed medications, experiencing untreated pain and anxiety, and a decreased quality of life. The findings included: During an observation of the 2200/2500 hall medication aide cart on 8/28/2025 at 8:14 AM, a sample of controlled medications was inventoried for accuracy with Medication Aide B. The sample inventory showed no discrepancies between medication quantities documented on the individual controlled substance logs and the number of pills remaining in the blister packs, however record review of the comprehensive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 2 of 8 residents (Resident #3 and Resident #34) reviewed for infection control: 1. The facility failed to ensure staff wore proper PPE while performing wound care for Resident #3. 2. The facility failed to ensure CNA F and CNA G performed hand hygiene between glove changes while performing incontinent care for Resident #34. These failures could place residents at-risk for infection due to improper care practices.The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #3's admission record, dated 8/29/25, revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included liver cell carcinoma (liver cancer), mid protein calorie malnutrition, malignant neoplasm (cancerous tumors) of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-29 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for 3 (dry #1, #3, and #4) of 4 dryers reviewed for environment. The facility failed to properly dispose and maintain the lint accumulation in the facility dryers in a timely manner. This failure could put residents at risk for an unsafe and unsanitary environment.Findings included: Observation on 8/28/25 at 4:19 p.m. of facility's laundry room revealed there were four (4) dryers that were in use at that time. Observation of the lint collector area beneath three (3) dryers revealed a layer of thick lint about 0.5 inch thick accumulated on the top of lint trap and on the bottom of the dryer. Record review of a document titled Dryer Cleaning, no date, showed a log that was filled out on 8/26/25 at 11:00 a.m., 1:00 p.m., and 3:00 p.m. Interview on 8/28/25 at 3:07 p.m. Laundry Aide H stated they should clean out the lint trap every 2 hours and document it in a log after she cleans it. Laundry Aide H stated she forgot to document on the log when she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 34 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents have the right to be informed of and participate in their treatment, including the right to be informed in advance of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives or treatment options, and to choose the alternative or option they prefer for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #35) whose records were reviewed for informed consent. The facility failed to obtain signed consent prior to administering the psychotropic medication Risperdal (an atypical antipsychotic indicated for the treatment of schizophrenia, bipolar I disorder with acute manic or mixed episodes, and autism-associated irritability) for Resident #35. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving medications without consent and without the option choose alternative treatment or decline treatment based on awareness of the risks and benefits of the medications.The findings included: Record review of Resident #35's admission sheet dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to respect the residents' right to confidentiality in his or her personal and medical records for one (Laptop) of three medication cart computers reviewed for confidential medical records. The facility failed to ensure a laptop A was not left open with patient information on the screen. This failure could place residents at risk of resident-identifiable information being accessed by unauthorized persons. Findings included: Observation on 08/26/25 at 11:21 a.m. revealed laptop A was on top of a medication cart was left open in hallway displaying Resident #25's appointment information for a medical appointment with the date, time, and location for the appointment for anyone passing by to see. No staff was at the cart with laptop A and no staff returned to Laptop A before it timed out and turned off on its own. Interview on 8/29/25 at 1:05 p.m. the DON stated the laptop was used by all staff. The DON stated the computer should not be left on displaying patient information because it was a HIPPA violation and anyone…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) program under Medicaid in subpart C of this part to the maximum extent practicable to avoid duplicative testing and effort for 1 of 8 residents reviewed for PASRR (Resident #34). The facility failed to ensure Resident #34 had an accurate PASRR Level 1 Screening indicating diagnoses of mental illness and refer the residents to the state designated authority. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving needed assessments (PASRR Evaluation), individualized care, and specialized services to meet their needs.Findings included: Record Review of Resident #34's admission record, dated 8/26/25, revealed a [AGE] year-old female initially admitted [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder (a mental health condition with a mix of schizophrenia symptoms such as hallucinations and delusions, and mood disorder symptoms, such as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible for 1 of 4 hallways (hallway 2300) observed for accidents and hazards: The facility failed to ensure hallway 2300 did not have a capped lancet lying in the middle of the floor. This failure could place residents at risk of harm or injury and contribute to avoidable accidents and a decline in health. The findings included: During an observation on 8/28/2025 at 11:07 AM, a capped lancet was observed lying on the floor of hallway 2300. Twenty minutes later at 11:27 AM, the capped lancet was still observed lying on the floor of hallway 2300. Between 11:07 AM and 11:27 AM, Housekeeper A was observed walking up and down hallway 2300 past the capped lancet cleaning restrooms and resupplying rooms with soap and paper towels. Housekeeper A did not pick up the capped lancet or bring it to the attention of staff nurses during the observation period. During an interview with Housekeeper A on 8/28/2025 at 11:30 AM, Housekeeper A stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder and bowel received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #34) reviewed for incontinent care: The facility failed to ensure CNA F did not wipe between Resident #34's gluteal folds from back to front in the wrong direction during incontinent care. This deficient practice could place residents at-risk for infection and skin break down due to improper care practices. The findings included: Record Review of Resident #34's admission record, dated 8/26/25, revealed a [AGE] year-old female initially admitted [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes (high blood sugar levels, insulin resistance, and a relative loss of insulin), bacteremia (infection or bacteria in the blood), schizoaffective disorder (a mental health condition with a mix of schizophrenia symptoms such as hallucinations and delusions, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who required dialysis received such services, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #4) reviewed for dialysis: The facility did not maintain communication, coordination, and collaboration with the dialysis facility for Resident #4. This failure could affect residents who received dialysis treatments and place them at risk for complications and not receiving proper care and treatment to meet their needs. The findings included:Record review of Resident #4's admission record, dated 8/29/25 with an initial admission date of 12/13/2017 and readmission of 7/31/25 revealed a resident [AGE] year-old male resident with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease (the final stage of and type 2 diabetes mellitus (high blood sugar levels, insulin resistance, and a relative last of insulin) without complications. Record Review of Resident #4's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 7/31/25, reflected…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 2 of 5 medication carts (the 2200/2500 hall medication aide cart and the 2300/2400 hall medication aide cart) assessed for medication storage and labeling. The facility failed to ensure all medications located inside the 2200/2500 hall medication aide cart and the 2300/2400 hall medication aide cart were stored in labeled containers. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving inadequate treatments or ingesting medications for which they were not prescribed. The findings included: During an observation of the 2200/2500 hall medication aide cart on 8/28/2025 at 8:14 AM, two dosing cups with pills were discovered sitting in the top drawer of the cart. During an interview with Medication Aide B on 8/28/2025 at 8:14 AM, Medication Aide B stated if pills are left in dosing cups in the medication cart, they could be mistaken for someone else's pills and be given to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medical records were kept in accordance with professional standards and practices and were complete and accurately documented for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #35) reviewed for accuracy of records. The facility failed to ensure Resident #35's diagnosis of bipolar disorder was documented on the resident's active diagnosis list, the MDS assessment, and the care plan. This failure could place residents at risk for improper care due to inaccurate records. The findings included: Record review of Resident #35's admission sheet dated 7/01/2025 documented a [AGE] year-old male resident with diagnoses including dementia with behavioral disturbance, benign prostatic hyperplasia (enlarged prostate leading to difficulty urinating), and hypothyroidism (when the thyroid gland does not produce enough thyroid hormone). Record review of Resident #35's MDS dated [DATE] documented a BIMS score of 14 indicating intact cognition and recorded the use of antipsychotic,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all allegations involving abuse, neglect, and misappropriation were reported immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the allegation was made to the State Survey Agency for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility did not report to the State Survey Agency (HHSC) an alleged romantic relationship between Resident #1 and LVN A, as reported by Resident #1 to the DON, and LVN A to the ADON. This failure could place residents at risk for abuse/neglect and could lead to a diminished quality of life and psychosocial harm. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission record, undated, reflected a [AGE] year-old resident with an initial admission of 02/03/2025 and diagnoses including acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (a condition where the lungs cannot adequately oxygenate the blood) and quadriplegia (paralysis of all four limbs). Record review of Resident #1's BIMS Assessment reflected…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that the comprehensive person-centered care plan described services that are furnished to maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for care plans in that: 1. Resident #1's care plan did not indicate that Resident #1 was noncompliant with the facility smoking policy and did not indicate effective interventions for the noncompliance. 2. Resident #1's care plan did not indicate that Resident #1 had verbally disruptive and aggressive behaviors toward staff and others and did not indicate effective interventions for the behaviors. This deficient practice could affect residents with behaviors and/or residents who smoke due to these conditions not being identified in the care plan and not indicating effective interventions to the behaviors in the care plan. The findings were: Record review of Resident #1's undated face sheet revealed Resident #1 was a [AGE] year…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assured accurate administering of all drugs to meet the needs of residents for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for medication regimen. 1. LVN B did not administer Resident #1's Hydrocortisone gel to his face within the parameters of the scheduled administration time on 11/15/2024. 2. MA A documented that MA A administered medications to Resident #1 on 11/15/2024 that had not been administered. 3. MA A prepared Resident #1's medications, placed the medications in unlabeled cups and stored the medications in the top drawer of MA A's medication cart on 11/15/2024. 4. MA A was administering Lidocaine 4% patches for Resident #1 instead of Lidocaine gel as ordered. 5. LVN A did not administer Resident #1's Hydrocortisone gel to his face within the parameters of the scheduled administration time on 11/18/2024. These failures could place residents who receive medications…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 7 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for quality of care. 1. The facility failed to schedule an ENT appointment for Resident #1 per a physician's order. 2. The facility failed to schedule a Vascular appointment for Resident #1 per a physician order. This failure could affect resident who were referred for services with outside providers and could result in a decline in physical condition. The findings were: Record review of Resident #1's undated face sheet revealed Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Cerebral Infarction (a disruption in the brain's blood flow), Hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and Depression. Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 08/17/2024, revealed Resident #1 had a BIMS score of 15, indicating no cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection and prevention control program that included, at a minimum, a system for preventing and controlling infections for 1 of 3 (Resident #3) residents reviewed for medication administration. MA B failed to perform hand hygiene after administering medications to Resident #2 and before administering medications to Resident #3. This failure could place residents receiving medication at risk for cross contamination and/or spread of infection. The findings were: Record review of Resident #2's undated face sheet revealed Resident #2 was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Dementia (a general term for impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions), Anxiety and Asymptomatic Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection (a virus that attacks the body's immune system). Record review of Resident #2's admission MDS assessment, dated 09/25/2024, revealed Resident #2 had a BIMS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain housekeeping and maintenance services to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior for 1 of 6 resident rooms, observed for housekeeping and maintenance, in that: 1. Resident #2's bed foot board was broken and hanging on the bedframe. 2. Resident #2 was sleeping in bed without linen. These failures could lead to resident injury and a diminished quality of life. The findings were: Record review of Resident #2'a face sheet, dated 11/1/24 reflected a male age [AGE]. The resident was re- admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: dementia (primary). Record review of Resident's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] reflected resident's BIMS score was documented as 1 (severely impaired). B/B was documented as incontinent; and resident required one staff assistance for bathing. Resident was ambulatory with staff supervision. Record review of Resident #2's CP, undated, reflected the resident received ADL for transfer, mobility, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, that are complete; and accurately documented for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for medical records. Resident #1's Nurse [NAME] for October 2024 for bathing was documented differently from the CNAs October 2024 POC (an electronic record system) documentation. This failure could result in residents not having an accurate overall view of their care and services. The findings were: Record review of Resident#1 's face sheet, dated 10/31/24 reflected a male age [AGE]. The resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage (primary) (stroke), anxiety, cognitive deficits, and dysphasia following cerebral infarction (stroke). RP was listed as: family member. Record review of Resident#1's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], reflected: the resident's BIMS score was 6 (moderate impairment). Resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that are complete and accurately documented for 2 of 3 residents (Residents #1 and #2) reviewed for accuracy of medical records in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure medications prescribed to Resident #1 were documented on the MAR for multiple dates in August 2024. 2. The facility failed to ensure medications prescribed to Resident #2 were documented on the MAR for multiple dates in August 2024. These failures could affect residents whose records are maintained by the facility and could place the residents at risk for errors in care and treatment. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 8/16/24 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included bipolar disorder (disorder associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs), muscle weakness, lack of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents have a right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for safe, clean, comfortable environment, in that: 1. In room [ROOM NUMBER], there were loose tiles around the toilet, the bolt securing the toilet to the flood was rusted, there was an excessive accumulation of dust and debris on top of the mirror above the sink and paper towel dispenser, and the vent located on the wall across from the bathroom had a large accumulation of dust surrounding each opening. 2. A light above the sink in the Secured Unit shower room was not functioning. 3. In the bathroom of room [ROOM NUMBER], the toilet seat had a broken hinge. 4. In room [ROOM NUMBER], there were broken window blinds, there were large water marks on the ceiling panels of the bathroom, and the ceiling exhaust fan in the bathroom was separated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 10 of 24 residents (Residents #3, #4, #8, #11, #14, #19, #24, #33, #39, and #46) reviewed for the provision of routine and emergency drugs and biologicals, in that: 1. On [DATE] at 10:54 AM MA B administered Resident #3's baclofen 1 hour and 53 minutes late, and the resident's torsemide (a diuretic used to treat swelling), buspirone, and gabapentin (a medication to treat nerve pain) 53 minutes late. 2. On [DATE] at 10:46 AM MA B administered Resident #4's clonazepam (a medication used to treat anxiety) 1 hour and 46 minutes late. 3. On [DATE] at 11:18 AM MA B administered Resident #8's buspirone (a medication to treat anxiety) 2 hours and 18 minutes late. 4. On [DATE] at 11:22 AM MA B administered Resident #11's hydralazine 2 hours and 55…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-12 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to prepare and provide food and drink that was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature, for 7 of 28 residents (Resident #13, #15, #17, #25, #37, #54, and #61) reviewed for palatable and appetizing food, in that: 1. The facility served Resident #25 a breakfast meal 1 hour and 2 minutes after the kitchen delivered the meal, and the meal was cold and not palatable to the resident. 2. The facility served Resident #13 a breakfast meal 58 minutes after the kitchen delivered the meal, and the meal was cold and not palatable to the resident. 3. The facility served Resident #61 a breakfast meal 56 minutes after the kitchen delivered the meal, and the meal was cold and not palatable to the resident. 4. The facility served Resident #37 a breakfast meal 54 minutes after the kitchen delivered the meal, and the meal was cold and not palatable to the resident. 5. The facility served Resident #15 a breakfast meal 45 minutes after…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen, in that: 1. The facility failed to store an opened bag of cereal in a sealed container in the dry storage room. 2. The facility failed to ensure the chlorine sanitizer in the dish machine was at the minimum concentration necessary to sanitize dishes and utensils. These deficient practices could place residents who received meals and/or snacks from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness. The findings were: 1. Observation on 07/09/2024 at 10:41 AM in the dry storage room revealed a 35-oz. bag of corn flakes cereal. The cereal was stored in a zip-locked bag that was not sealed. During an interview on 07/09/2024 at 10:42 AM, the DM stated the zip locked bag should have been sealed to prevent the quality of the cereal from spoiling and potential contamination from rodents and pests. She further stated it was the responsibility of all dietary staff storing food in the dry storage room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-12 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor residents' right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other residents, for 1 of 24 residents (Resident #24) reviewed for needs and preferences, in that: On 07/09/2024 at 11:14 AM Resident #24 was left in her bedroom, in her bed with the call light button underneath her left back. Resident #24 was semi-paralyzed on her left side and could not reach the call light button. This failure could place residents at risk for harm by not honoring residents' individualized needs and preferences. The findings included: Record review of Resident #24's admission record dated 07/11/2024, revealed an admission date of 10/16/2023 with diagnoses which included left sided hemiparesis (left sided semi paralysis), contractures of left elbow and hand (a condition that causes one or more fingers to bend…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 1 of 2 medication rooms reviewed for medication storage, in that: The medication room on the second floor was left unattended and unlocked. This failure could place residents at risk for harm by not receiving the medications due to misappropriation. The findings included: Observation on 7/10/24 at 09:50 AM revealed the medication room on the facility's second floor, located at the beginning of the resident's hallway, was left unattended and unlocked. Further observation revealed multiple residents' medications which were stored inside the room. The medication room had a key latch door handle which was unlocked. During an interview on 07/10/2024 at 09:55 AM LVN A stated she was the nurse on duty for the second floor. LVN A stated she was busy serving Resident's breakfasts and was unaware the medication room was unattended and unlocked. During an interview on 7/10/24 at 10:00 AM MA B stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-12 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed a to dispose of garbage and refuse properly for 1 of 2 Dumpsters (Dumpster #2) reviewed for disposal of garbage, in that: The facility failed to ensure Dumpster #2's door was completely shut, had a drain plug, and was free of pests. These deficient practices could place residents at risk for exposure to germs and diseases carried by vermin and rodents. The findings were: Observation on 07/11/2024 at 11:50 AM revealed Dumpster #2 did not have drainage plug, the door was open, and there were ants present. During an interview on 07/11/2024 at 11:51 AM, the DM stated the door to Dumpster #2 was open and should not have been, as it presented an unsanitary condition and an opportunity for the proliferation of rodents. The DM also noted the presence of ants crawling on the rear side of the Dumpster. During an interview on 07/11/2024 at 12:15 PM, the Maintenance Director stated the drain plug was missing from Dumpster #2 and he would ensure it was replaced. The DM also noted the presence of ants and indicated he would…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-12 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to be adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area from each resident's bedside and toilet and bathing facilities, for 1 of 24 residents (Resident #25) reviewed for call light accessibility and functionality, in that: On 07/09/2024 at 01:00 PM Resident #25 utilized his call light which did not illuminate the nurse call light directly outside and above of his room door. This failurs could place residents at risk for harm by not receiving care and attention when their nurse call light system malfunctions and or is out of reach. The findings included: Record review of Resident #25's admission record dated 07/11/2024 revealed an admission date of 11/18/2022 with diagnoses which included left sided hemiparesis (left sided semi paralysis) and general anxiety disorder. A record review of Resident #25's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-12 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for environmental concerns, in that: The ceiling fan in the Soiled Utility Room on th 2300 Hallway had dust and dirt particles in the vent slats. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not living in a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment. The findings included: Observation on the 500 Hall on 07/10/24 from 9:55 AM to 10:25 AM with the Maintenance Director revealed the soiled utility room on the 2300 resident hallway had a ceiling fan measuring approximately 2 x 2 feet that had dust and dirt particles in the vent slats. During an interview with the Maintenance Director on 7/10/24 at 10:15 AM he stated that he would repair all of the maintenance concerns revealed during the observation tour. The Maintenance Director stated that the repairs would improve resident safety and homelike environment. During an interview with the Administrator on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, which are complete, and accurately documented for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for completeness and accuracy. The facility failed to transcribe Resident #3's order for Morphine correctly. This deficient practice could affect residents whose records were maintained by the facility and could place them at risk for errors in care and treatment. The findings were: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet, dated 6/20/2024 revealed, the resident was admitted initially on 7/132018 with readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: chronic systolic heart failure(specific type of heart failure that occurs in the heart's left ventricle. The left and right ventricles are the bottom chambers of the heart. In a person with systolic heart failure, the heart is weak, and the left ventricle can't contract (squeeze) normally when the heart beats), chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality. The facility must protect and promote the rights of the resident for 1 of 17 (Resident #29) in that: The facility failed to honor Resident #29's right to present when Administrator A entered the resident's room and misappropriated personal items and threw them away in the trash. This failure could result in residents experiencing a decline in self-worth and quality of life. The findings were: Record review of Resident #29's face sheet, dated 06/26/24, revealed a [AGE] year-old female resident who was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: end stage renal disease, anxiety, major depressive disorder, HTN (hypertension). Resident was her own RP. Record review of Resident #29's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-03 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to treat residents with dignity and respect of personal possessions for 1 of 17 residents (Resident #17) reviewed for resident rights, in that: Hospitality Aide D turned off, on 12/23/23 at 3:44 PM, Resident #17's electronic monitoring device, a personal possession, without asking for permission to turn off the device. This deficient practice could affect residents who reside at the facility and result in a loss of personal property, frustration and loss of dignity. The findings were: Record review of Resident #17's face sheet, dated 6/27/24 revealed, a [AGE] year old male who was admitted on [DATE] and discharged [DATE] home with diagnoses that included: HEMIPLEGIA AND HEMIPARESIS ( paralysis of one side of the body), FOLLOWING CEREBRAL INFARCTION (stroke), DEMENTIA, and PARANOID PERSONALITY DISORDER. Resident was his own RP. Record review of Resident #17's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 10 (moderately impaired). Record review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-03 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right to be free from misappropriation of property was provided for 1 of 17 residents (Resident #29) reviewed for misappropriation and exploitation, in that: The facility did not prevent Resident #29's personal belongings from being lost when the former Administrator (A) without the resident's permission or the resident being present removed personal items from the resident's room. This failure could affect residents and their responsible party by preventing them from having access to their personal effects and belongings. The findings included: Record review of Resident #29's face sheet, dated 06/26/24, revealed a [AGE] year-old female resident who was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: end stage renal disease, anxiety, major depressive disorder, HTN (hypertension). Resident was her own RP. Record review of Resident #29's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed BIMS score was 15 (cognitively intact). Record review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen (Main Kitchen), in that: The facility failed to ensure opened items in the reach in refrigerators were dated or discarded correctly. This deficient practice could place residents who ate food from the kitchen at risk for foodborne illness. The findings were: During an observation and interview with the DM, in the refrigerator storage areas, on 05/30/2023 at 09:02 a.m., revealed an opened container of mushrooms (received 05/21/2022) with no opened date; an opened container of jalapenos (received 05/21/2022) with no opened date; an opened container of sour cream (received 05/17/2023) with no opened date; and an opened container of flavored sauce (received 10/12/2022 and opened 10/18/2022). The DM stated opened food items, per facility policy, were supposed to be discarded seven days after being opened. The DM also stated items were supposed to be dated after being opened. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-02 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of resident needs for 1 of 15 residents reviewed for call light: Resident # 214's call light was not placed within reach. This failure could place residents who used call lights for assistance at risk in maintaining and/or achieving independent functioning, dignity, and well-being. Findings included: Record review of Resident's # 214 face sheet dated, 6/2/23, revealed a [AGE] year-old male, admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included: Hemiplegia on Left side [loss of strength on left side arm and leg] Hyperlipidemia [abnormally high concentration of fats in the blood Hypertension [blood pressure that is higher than normal] Review of Resident # 214's admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 15, suggesting the patient was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #214's admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed that under section G, G0300, option # 2 was selected, stating the patient is unsteady on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-02 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' right to formulate an advance directive for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #44) reviewed for advanced directives, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #44's Out-of-Hospital Do Not Resuscitate (OOH-DNR) was signed by the appropriate witnesses. This failure could place residents at-risk for residents' rights not being honored. The findings were: Record review of Resident #44's face sheet, dated 06/02/2023, revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: dementia, major depressive disorder, congestive heart failure, diabetes, and bipolar disorder. Record review of Resident #44's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 03/13/2023, revealed the resident had a BIMS score of 13, which indicated borderline/intact cognitive impairment. Record review of Resident #44's physicians orders, dated 06/02/2023, revealed an order entered on 04/14/2023 that read: DNR. Record review of Resident #44's care plan, undated,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary services to maintain acceptable grooming and personal hygiene for 1 of 15 residents reviewed for ADLs (activities of daily living). Resident # 54 The facility did not ensure Resident #54 received grooming for their facial hair. This failure could place residents who required assistance with activities of daily living, and who were dependent on staff to perform personal hygiene at risk for embarrassment and or decreased self-esteem or decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #54's face sheet, dated 6/2/23, revealed a [AGE] year-old female with an admission date of 10/12/22 with diagnoses that included: Diabetes type II [is a condition that happens because of a problem in how the body regulates and uses sugar as a fuel]. Dementia [is a condition characterized by progressive or persistent loss of intellectual functioning] Mild Intellectual Disability [slower in all areas of conceptual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-10-06 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to post the daily nursing staffing formation that included the facility name, the current date, the total number and actual hours worked by the following categories of licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift: registered nurses, licensed practical nurses, certified nurse aides and resident census in a prominent place readily accessible to residents, staff, and visitors for 61 residents in that: The facility failed to post the daily staff posting information on 10/01/2025 and 10/02/2025. This failure could place residents and visitors at risk of not being able to review the facility's daily staffing hours. The findings included: During an observation, 10/01/2025 at 8:28 a.m., a daily staffing poster was observed on top of the receptionist desk in a plastic display holder that was titled, Daily report of nursing staff directly responsible for resident care and was dated 09/10/2025. During an observation, 10/02/2025 at 12:02 p.m., the daily staffing poster display was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$174,889 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

  • $14,508 — penalty dated 2026-02-13
  • $9,113 — penalty dated 2026-01-16
  • $151,268 — penalty dated 2025-08-29

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CREATIVE SOLUTIONS IN HEALTHCARE — 149 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.7-1.7 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.1-0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 1 of 53.2-2.2 vs chain
The other 148 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)
1 of 5Afton Oaks Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterHouston, TX 1 of 5Arlington Heights Health and Rehabilitation CenterFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Beltline Healthcare CenterGarland, TX 1 of 5Bluebonnet Nursing & RehabilitationKarnes City, TX 1 of 5Bluebonnet Point WellnessBullard, TX 1 of 5Brentwood Terrace Healthcare And RehabilitationParis, TX 1 of 5Cottonwood Nursing & RehabilitationDenton, TX 1 of 5Countryview Nursing & RehabilitationTerrell, TX 1 of 5Dogwood Trails ManorWoodville, TX 1 of 5Downtown Health and Rehabilitation CenterFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Estates Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Fair Park Health & Rehabilitation CenterDallas, TX 1 of 5Five Points Nursing & Rehabilitation of College StCollege Station, TX 1 of 5Five Points at Lake Highlands Nursing and RehabDallas, TX 1 of 5Five Points of PflugervillePflugerville, TX 1 of 5Franklin Heights Nursing & RehabilitationEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Gilmer Nursing & RehabilitationGilmer, TX 1 of 5Grace Pointe Wellness CenterEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Graham Oaks Care CenterGraham, TX 1 of 5Granbury Care CenterGranbury, TX 1 of 5Greenhill VillasMount Pleasant, TX 1 of 5Heritage At Longview Healthcare CenterLongview, TX 1 of 5Huebner Creek Health & Rehabilitation CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Interlochen Health and Rehabilitation CenterArlington, TX 1 of 5Kenedy Health & RehabilitationKenedy, TX 1 of 5Kennedy Health & RehabLufkin, TX 1 of 5Lake Lodge Nursing & RehabilitationLake Worth, TX 1 of 5Lampstand Nursing and RehabilitationBryan, TX 1 of 5Lancaster Nursing & RehabilitationLancaster, TX 1 of 5Marine Creek Nursing & RehabilitationFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Mesa Vista Inn Health CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Mountain View Health & RehabilitationEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Navasota Nursing & RehabilitationNavasota, TX 1 of 5Normandy Terrace Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5North Pointe Nursing and RehabilitationWatauga, TX 1 of 5Park Place Care CenterGeorgetown, TX 1 of 5Parkview Manor Nursing and RehabilitationWeimar, TX 1 of 5Peach Tree PlaceWeatherford, TX 1 of 5Pebble Creek Nursing CenterEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Pecan Tree Rehab And Healthcare CenterGainesville, TX

Showing 40 of 148; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
WEST WHARTON COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICTOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/01/2022
BOWERS, SEANIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 07/01/2024
CISNEROS, ALFREDIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 02/18/2008
COBB, TRAVISIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 10/05/2022
COOPER, STEPHENIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 11/22/2022
HARDIN, SHERRIEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 09/04/2024
KERZEE, RICHARDIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 09/24/2007
KORENEK, PATRICIAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 05/05/2018
SOECHTING, PAULIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 11/22/2024
STRACK, JOEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 02/11/2022
HUGGINS, LINDAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/01/2022
WILLIG, ZACHARYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2025
THOMPSON, JOHNNYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
SAN ANTONIO IV ENTERPRISES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/07/2025
BLAKE, GARYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2022
BLAKE, MALISAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/01/2022
DIXON, ANNAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 04/14/2025
PANTHER, RANDYIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-28.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 81%Medicare 5%Other / private 14%

About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$247per resident / day
operating cost
$7,501per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$192per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 455390. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-29, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next