Normandy Terrace Nursing & Rehabilitation Center
841 Rice Road, San Antonio, TX 78220 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 320 certified beds · (210) 648-0101 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jan 2026
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 3 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $287,359 in federal fines (most recent 2025-08-18)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (96%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 30.1% | 15.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.8% | 3.0% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.2% | 2.4% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 1.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.2% | 3.3% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 29.9% | 14.0% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.7% | 18.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.0% | 3.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 20.2% | 13.4% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 7.4% | 9.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.1% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 88.0% | 79.4% | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Met the expected recovery: 52.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 28% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 52.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 60.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 48.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 9.7% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 320 beds and averages 110.4 residents a day — about 34% occupied, or roughly 210 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.01 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.85 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.46 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.23 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 96% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
50 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-08-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible and each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents and supervision in that: The facility failed to supervise Resident #1 who eloped from the facility on 08/16/25 and was gone from the facility for more than nine hours and found in a closed car and had sustained a heat stroke. The non-compliance was identified as PNC. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) began on 08/16/2025 and ended on 08/16/2025. The facility had corrected the non-compliance before the survey began on 08/17/2025. This deficient practice could place residents who were elopement risks at-risk of harm, serious injury, or death. The findings included: Review of Resident's #1 face sheet, dated 8/17/25, revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: multiple sclerosis (a condition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident receives adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1), reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to supervise Resident #1 who eloped out of a side door of the facility on 2/17/25 at approximately 7:12 p.m. without staff knowledge, through a side door that the alarm had been turned off on and was found ambulating down the sidewalk approximately 400 feet from the facility. An Immediate Jeopardy was identified as past noncompliance on 4/23/25. The IJ began on 2/17/25 and ended on 2/18/25. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could put residents at risk of accidents, and could result in serious injury, harm, impairment, and death. The findings were: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 4/22/25 revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with readmission on [DATE]. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2024-08-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents had the right to be free from abuse, neglect and misappropriation of property for 2 of 6 residents (Residents #2 and #3) reviewed for abuse, in that: 1. The facility failed to protect Resident #2 from physical abuse when Resident #1 grabbed, scratched and hit Resident #2 during a smoke break on [DATE]. The facility failed to respond to develop a plan of care, behavior monitoring, interventions or train staff on behaviors to prevent further abuse. 2. The facility failed to protect Resident #3 from physical and psychological abuse when Resident #1 repeatedly hit Resident #3 in the face and head and scratched him on [DATE] which resulted in swelling, redness, bruising to Resident #3's left eye, scratches to his face, neck, chest and arms and trauma. On [DATE] Resident #1 was arrested and charged with a class three felony for abuse of an elderly and currently resided in a local jail waiting indictment. An IJ was identified on [DATE].…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2024-08-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that includes measurable objective and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 3 of 4 residents (Residents #1, #2, and #3) reviewed for care plans, in that: 1. Facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan with interventions that addressed Resident #1's diagnoses of mental illness including depression, schizophrenia, dementia or antisocial personality disorder, and behaviors which included stealing, agitation, and aggression. 2. The facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan with interventions that addressed Resident #2's behaviors, specifically associated around smoke breaks, refusal of medications and mental illness or his altercation with Resident #1 associated with a smoke break and interventions to keep him…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-06-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to consult with the resident's physician when there is a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status (that is, a deterioration in health, mental, or psychosocial status in either life-threatening conditions or clinical complications) for 1 (Resident #2) of 7 residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to notify Resident #2's physician of her change of condition on [DATE]. Resident #2 continued to have these symptoms and was sent out to the hospital on [DATE]. On [DATE] at 4:30 pm an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified. While the IJ was removed on [DATE], the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of potential for more than minimal harm that was not an immediate jeopardy due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation the effectiveness of their Plan of Removal. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk for a delay in medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible and each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents and supervision, in that: Resident #1 eloped from the facility on 02/21/2024 and again on 03/04/2024. The facility failed to prevent Resident #1 from eloping on 2/21/24. Resident #1 eloped again when he was not being monitored on 3/4/24. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified as past non-compliance on 04/18/2024. The non-compliance began on 02/21/2024 and ended on 03/05/2024. The facility had corrected the non-compliance before the survey began. This deficient practice could place residents who were elopement risks at-risk of harm, serious injury, or death. The findings were: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 04/18/2024, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: unspecified dementia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-07-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary services to maintain good grooming, personal hygiene for residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living for 3 of 5 residents (Residents #1, #2, and #3) reviewed for ADLs. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received scheduled showers on 6/13/2026, 6/16/2026, 6/18/2026, 6/20/2026, 6/23/2026, 6/25/2026. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 received scheduled showers on 6/13/2026, 6/16/2026, 6/18/2026, 6/20/2026, 6/23/2026, 6/25/2026, 6/27/2026, 6/30/2026. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3 received scheduled showers on 6/15/2026, 6/19/2026, 6/22/2026, 6/24/2026, 6/26/2026. These failures could place residents at risk of skin breakdown, infection, and contribute to feelings of poor self-esteem and hopelessness.The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's admission record, dated 7/2/2026, revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary services to maintain good grooming, personal hygiene for residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living for 3 of 6 Residents (Residents #1, #2, and #3) reviewed for quality of life. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received scheduled showers on 04/22/2026, 04/27/2026, 05/1/2026, 05/4/2026, 05/6/2026, 05/8/2026, and 05/13/2026. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 received scheduled showers on 04/25/2026, 04/28/2026, 05/9/2026, and 05/12/2026. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3 received scheduled showers on 04/22/2026, 04/27/2026, 05/8/2026, 05/13/2026, and 5/15/2026. These failures could affect any resident and contribute to feelings of poor self-esteem and hopelessness.The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's admission record, dated 05/18/2026, revealed a [AGE] year-old male readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with an original admission date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with the comprehensive person-centered care plan and in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4 received wound care on 04/01/2026, 04/03/2026, 04/05/2026, 04/06/2026, 04/07/2026, 04/08/2026, 04/09/2026, 04/10/2026, 04/11/2026, 04/12/2026, 04/13/2026, 04/15/2026, 04/16/2026, 04/20/2026, 04/20/2026, 04/24/2026, 04/30/2026, 05/06/2026, 05/08/2026, 05/09/2026, 05/10/2026, 05/13/2026, 05/04/2026, and 05/18/2026. These failures could affect residents who receive wound care treatments by placing them at risk for receiving inadequate treatments resulting in the worsening of the wounds.The findings include: Record review of Resident #4's face sheet, dated 05/20/2026, revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: type 2 diabetes mellitus…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that were complete and accurately documented for 2 of 6 residents (Residents #4 and #5) reviewed for accuracy of records: 1. Nursing staff failed to document accurate weekly skin assessments and weekly ulcer assessments for Resident #4 from March to May 2026 when it was documented the resident had no skin breakdown when the resident had a wound to the right heel. 2. Nursing staff failed to document weekly skin assessments for Resident #5 for May 2026. These failures could affect residents whose records were maintained by the facility and could place the residents at risk of errors in care and treatment.The findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #4's face sheet, dated 05/20/2026, revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia (insulin resistance and high blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident has the right to be informed of, and participate in, his or her treatment, including; the right to be informed in advance, by the physician or other practitioner or professional, of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives or treatment options and to choose the alternative or option he or she prefers for 2 of 5 residents (Residents #2 and #3) reviewed for the right to be informed of, and participate in treatment.1.The facility failed to obtain signed consents for 2 anti-psychotic medications for Resident #2.2.The facility failed to obtain a signed consent for an anti-psychotic medication for Resident #3.These failures could place residents at risk for inaccurate documentation of clinical records and misuse of psychotropic medication that could result in diminished quality of care.The findings included:1.Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 4/24/2026, revealed a [AGE] year-old female…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1) reviewed receiving nebulizer treatments. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's face mask and tubing were stored properly to prevent contamination when the resident's unprotected face mask and tubing were observed lying on the resident's bedside table next to their bed. This failure could put residents receiving medication via nebulizer and face masks at risk for cross-contamination and respiratory infection. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 04/23/2026, reflected a [AGE] year old male with current admission date of 08/22/2025 with diagnoses which included: hemiplegia (paralysis affecting one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness affecting one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the environment was as free of accident hazards as is possible and each resident receives adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents hazards and supervision: Resident #1 left the facility without supervision or staff knowledge on 3/19/26 from 11:35 p.m. to 11:57 p.m. Resident #1 was found approximately 0.1 miles away at a local fast-food restaurant. This failure could place residents at risk of accidents that could result in serious injury, harm, impairment, or death.The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 3/20/26 reflected a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (stroke, caused by loss of blood flow to part of the brain), COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease; long-term lung condition that makes it hard to breathe), abnormal posture, muscle weakness, lack of coordination,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored properly in the cart for 1 of 3 medication carts (300 hallway medication cart) reviewed for storage: he facility failed to ensure Resident #2's insulin Lispro was stored appropriately in a locked medication cart. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving prescribed medications as ordered and drug diversions. The findings included: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 3/18/26 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 1 diabetes (a chronic autoimmune disease in which the body's immune system destroys the insulin-producing cells of the pancreas, leading to an absolute deficiency of insulin), and dependence on renal dialysis (medical treatment that replaced some functions of the kidneys when they are no longer able to work effectively). Record review of Resident #2's most recent MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that were complete and accurately documented for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for accuracy of records: The facility failed to document wound care treatments on the TAR for Resident #3 on 3/1/25, 3/6/26, 3/7/26, 3/11/26, 3/13/26, 3/14/26, 3/15/26, and 3/16/26. These failures could affect residents whose records were maintained by the facility and could place the residents at risk of errors in care and treatment.The findings included: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet dated 3/19/26 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE], and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes, muscle weakness, lack of coordination, retention of urine, and pain. Record review of Resident #3's most recent quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected that the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision-making skills and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-23 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of needs and preferences for three (3) of twelve (12) residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3) reviewed for reasonable accommodation of needs. 1. The facility failed to ensure the call light system in Resident #1's room was in a position accessible to the resident on 02/20/2026.2. The facility failed to ensure the call light system in Resident #2's room was in a position accessible to the resident on 02/20/2026.3. The facility failed to ensure the call light system in Resident #3's room was in a position accessible to the resident on 02/23/2026. This failure could place the residents at risk of being unable to obtain assistance when needed and help in the event of an emergency.The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 02/20/2026, revealed an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]and re-admitted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 34 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for one (1) of twelve (12) residents (Resident #4) reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4 did not have two (2) velphoro oral tablets (a phosphate binder, a medication used to control phosphorus levels in the blood) at the bedside. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of medication misuse or drug diversion.The findings included: Record review of Resident #4's admission Record, dated 02/20/2026, revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #4's Diagnosis Report, dated 02/23/2026, revealed diagnoses including end stage renal disease (the final stage of chronic kidney disease, where the kidneys lose nearly all their ability to filter waste in the blood), and dependence on renal dialysis (condition where…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior by housekeeping and maintenance services, which were necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for homelike environment. The facility failed to maintain Resident #3's bathroom with dry clean drywall without damage and without stains. This failure could place residents at risk for diminished self-worth.The findings included: A record review of Resident #3's admission record dated 1/13/2026 revealed an admission date of 8/29/2025 with diagnoses which included mid back spine fractures at T7-T8 and T11-T12 (spine fractures), bladder cancer, and muscle weakness. A record review of Resident #3's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted for long term care supports for activities of daily life (ADLs). Resident #1 was assessed with the need for assistance with hygiene…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-16 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation as defined in this subpart, for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for misappropriation of property, in that: Housekeeper F (HK F) took Resident #2's money to purchase herself meals. This failure could place residents at risk for harm by exploitation which could result in psychosocial harm and mistrust of the staff. The findings included: Record review of the facility's undated Freedom from Abuse Notice to Employees Resident / Patient Abuse, Neglect, and Mistreatment of Belongings policy revealed, Gratuities and Loans . gratuities and gifts are any type of denomination of currency, items, of monetary value or could be exchanged for monetary value, services that are typically of monetary value, and items that have been designated to an individual that may have monetary value. It is the policy of the facility not to accept…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-16 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the basis for discharge was documented in the resident's medical record for 1 out of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for inappropriate discharges. 1.The facility failed to provide and document sufficient preparation and orientation for Resident #1 to ensure safe and orderly discharge from the facility to another facility. 2.The facility failed to develop and implement an effective discharge planning process and involve Resident #1 and the resident representative in the development of the discharge plan and inform Resident #1 and resident representative of the final plan. 3.The facility failed to have a discharge summary that included a post-discharge plan of care for Resident #1 that was developed with the participation of the resident representative(s), which would assist the resident to adjust to his or her new living environment. These failures could place residents at risk of diminished continuity of care and unsafe and/or improper…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #2 and Resident #3) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure RN A followed infection control policy/procedures during wound care for Resident #2 and Resident #3. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for infection. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's admission Record, dated 10/23/25, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: right femur fracture, Alzheimer's Disease (disease affecting memory and other important mental functions) , Dementia (group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning). An interview was attempted on 10/22/25 at 2:06 pm, Resident #2 did not respond to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to respect the residents right to personal privacy for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #2 and Resident #3) reviewed for privacy/dignity. The facility failed to ensure residents' privacy/dignity was maintained during wound care on (2) occasions. This failure could place residents at risk for poor self-esteem, decreased self-worth, and quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's admission Record, dated 10/23/25, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: right femur fracture, Alzheimer's Disease (disease affecting memory and other important mental functions), Dementia (group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning). Record review of Resident #2's comprehensive MDS assessment, dated 9/5/25, revealed the resident's cognitive skills for daily decision making were severely impaired. An interview was attempted on 10/22/25 at 2:06 pm, Resident #2 did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown sources are reported immediately but not later than 2 hours to the administrator of the facility and to other officials, including to the State Survey Agency in accordance with State law through established procedures, for 1 of 1 Residents (Resident #1) reviewed for Neglect, in that: The facility did not report an allegation of Neglect to the State Survey Agency (HHSC) within the 2 hours time frame of Resident #1's elopement from the facility This deficient practice could affect any resident and could contribute to further neglect. The findings were: Review of Resident #'s 1 face sheet dated 8/17/25, revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: multiple sclerosis (a condition in which nerve damage affects the communication between the brain and body), type 2 diabetes mellitus (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-25 · tag F0552 — patternEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to be informed of, and participate in, his or her treatment, including: The right to be informed in advance of the care to be furnished and the type of care giver or professional that will furnish the care, and the right to be informed in advance, by the physician or other practitioner or professional, of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives, or treatment options and to choose the alternative or options he or she preferred, for 1 (Resident #70) of 8 residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to obtain signed consent from Resident #70 to receive care under secured conditions. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving care under secured conditions without their or their responsible party's prior knowledge or consent, placing residents at risk of inability to make decisions regarding their plan of care. Findings included: 1. Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 2 of 6 residents (Residents #66 and #56) reviewed for infection control, in that: 1. While providing incontinent care for Resident #66, CNA E failed to use proper infection control. 2. While providing incontinent care for Resident #56, CNA F failed to use proper infection control. These deficient practices could place residents at-risk for infection due to improper care practices. The findings were: 1. Record review of Resident #66's face sheet, dated 07/24/2025, revealed an admission date of 04/01/2024, and, a readmission date of 02/19/2025, with diagnoses which included: Alcoholic cirrhosis of liver (Damage to the liver due to alcohol consumption), Dysphagia (Difficulty swallowing), Sepsis (Body's response to infection…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote and maintain the resident's dignity for 1 (Resident #10) of 25 residents reviewed for dignity, in that: Resident #10's wheelchair was visibly soiled with dust and food particles. This deficient practice could result in psychosocial harm due to feelings of embarrassment. The findings were: Record review of Resident #10's face sheet, dated 07/25/2025, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Abnormal Posture, Unspecified Lack of Coordination, and Muscle Wasting and Atrophy. Record review of Resident #10's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 14 which indicated intact cognition. Record review of Resident #10's care plan, revised 07/22/2025, revealed The resident has an ADL self-care performance deficit. Observation on 07/25/2025 at 1:45 p.m. revealed Resident #10 utilized a motorized wheelchair for ambulation. Further observation revealed Resident #10's wheelchair was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his or her personal and medical records for one of five residents (Resident # 66) reviewed for privacy. The facility failed to ensure MA C locked the computer, which exposed Resident #66's morning medication list after she walked away and left the computer unattended. This failure could place residents at risk of having medical information exposed to others and cause residents to feel uncomfortable and disrespected. The findings include: Record review of Resident #66's face sheet, dated 07/24/25, revealed an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #66 had diagnoses that included: Hypertension (is when the force of blood against the artery walls is persistently too high), and Depression (is a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and Dementia (decline in cognitive function, impacting memory,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is incontinent of bladder receives appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 1 of 2 resident (Resident #66) reviewed for incontinent care, in that: While providing incontinent care for Resident #66, CNA E used a back to front motion to clean Resident #66's buttocks. This deficient practice could place residents at-risk for infection and skin break down due to improper care practices.The findings were: Record review of Resident #66's face sheet, dated 07/24/2025, revealed an admission date of 04/01/2024, and, a readmission date of 02/19/2025, with diagnoses which included: Alcoholic cirrhosis of liver (Damage to the liver due to alcohol consumption), Dysphagia (Difficulty swallowing), Sepsis (Body's response to infection causes injury to its own tissues and organs), Dementia (Decline in cognitive abilities), Hyperlipidemia (Elevated level of any or all lipids(fat) in the blood), Hypertension (High blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that CNAs were able to demonstrate competency in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents' needs for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #66) by 1 of 6 CNAs (CNA E) reviewed for competent staff, in that: The facility failed to ensure CNA E used the right technique to clean Resident #66 while providing incontinent care. This deficient practice could place residents at-risk for infection and skin break down due to improper care practices.The findings were: Record review of Resident #66's face sheet, dated 07/24/2025, revealed an admission date of 04/01/2024, and, a readmission date of 02/19/2025, with diagnoses which included: Alcoholic cirrhosis of liver (Damage to the liver due to alcohol consumption), Dysphagia (Difficulty swallowing), Sepsis (Body's response to infection causes injury to its own tissues and organs), Dementia (Decline in cognitive abilities), Hyperlipidemia (Elevated level of any or all lipids(fat) in the blood), Hypertension (High blood pressure), Major depressive disorder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for, 1 of 3 (Hall 300 Nurse cart) medication carts observed, in that: The Nurse Medication Cart in the 300-hall contained five loose medication pills. This failure could place residents who receive medications at risk for not receiving the intended therapeutic effects of medications. The findings were: The findings were: Observation on 07/24/2025 at 7:45 p.m. of the 300 Hall Nurse Medication Cart revealed there were five loose medication pills inside one of the drawers. During an interview with MA C on 07/24/2025 at 7:50 p.m., MA C confirmed there were five loose medication pills inside a drawer of the Nurse Medication Cart. MA C stated the pills must have dropped at some point during a medication pass and she had not had a chance to clean the medication cart today. During an interview with the DON on 7/24/2025 at 8:20 p.m., the DON stated medication carts should not have loose medications. The DON stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0813 — isolatedHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain and ensure safe and sanitary storage of residents' food items for 1 ( Resident # 86 ) of 5 resident refrigerators reviewed in that: The personal refrigerator for Resident # 86 contained food items that were unlabeled and undated. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of foodborne illness due to consuming foods which are spoiled. The findings were: Observation on 07/22/2025 at 10:37 a.m. revealed Resident #86 personal refrigerator contained a plastic bowl with lid containing menudo (Mexican tripe soup) without an expiration date, which was unlabeled and undated. Further observation on 07/22/2025 at 1:30 p.m. revealed the plastic bowl in Resident # 86's personal refrigerator was still present without an expiration date, which was unlabeled and undated. Interview on 7/22/25, at 2:00 p.m. CNA B, said the refrigerator in Resident #86's room contained a plastic bowl with lid containing menudo without an expiration date. CNA B said the bowl was unlabeled and undated. CNA B stated it was the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records that were complete and accurately documented for 1 (Resident #66) of 25 residents reviewed for clinical records, in that: Resident #66's diagnoses of insomnia and aggressiveness /combativeness were not listed in his diagnosis list and Resident #66's physician order for psychotropic medication erroneously read supervised self-administration. This deficient practice could cause miscommunication among the resident's caregivers and result in improper care. The findings were: Record review of Resident #66's face sheet, dated 07/25/2025, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Generalized Anxiety Disorder and Major Depressive Disorder. Record review of Resident #66's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 03 which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Record review of Resident #66's care plan, revised 08/10/2024, revealed, The resident has a behavior problem r/t dementia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials including to the State Survey Agency where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities in accordance with State law through established procedures for 7 of 12 residents (Residents #2, #3, #4, #5, #7, #8, and #9), reviewed for freedom from abuse, neglect, and exploitation. 1. The facility failed to report when Resident #2 physically attacked Resident #3 for 2 days after the incident. 2. Facility failed to report an incident of suspected abuse, from 12/23/2024 when Resident #5 pushed Resident #4 down until 02/24/2025. 3. DON failed to report an incident of suspected abuse, from Saturday 04/19/2025 when Resident #7 accused staff hurting her, until Monday 04/21/2025. 4. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to a resident who [NAME] unable to carry out activities of daily living for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #2), reviewed for activities of daily living in the area of incontinent care. Resident #2 was not provided with incontinent care by a nursing staff member on 6/7/24 in a timely manner. This failure could result in residents experiencing a diminished quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's admission Record, dated 6/11/24, revealed Resident #2 the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the most recent readmission on [DATE]. , Resident #2 hadwith diagnoses that included: Parkinson's Disease (A disorder of the central nervous system that affects movement, often including tremors) , acute kidney failure (condition in which kidneys suddenly are unable to filter waste from blood) , schizophrenia (a disorder that affects a person's ability to think,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident medical records were kept in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, the facility must maintain medical records on each resident that are complete and accurately documented for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for clinical records. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's vital signs were documented in the EMR on [DATE] and [DATE]. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for improper care due to inaccurate records. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's admission Record, dated [DATE], revealed Resident #2 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the most recent readmission on [DATE], with diagnoses that included: Parkinson's Disease (A disorder of the central nervous system that affects movement, often including tremors), acute kidney failure (condition in which kidneys suddenly are unable to filter waste from blood), schizophrenia (a disorder that affects a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-05-31 · tag F0576 — widespreadEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promote the residents' right to receive mail, for all facility residents, in that: Facility staff did not distribute mail received on Saturdays to the residents. This deficient practice could result in residents not receiving mail in a timely manner and a diminished quality of life. The findings were: During a confidential group meeting on 05/30/2024 at 1:30 p.m., members of the resident group stated that they do not receive mail on Saturdays and stated they feel this practice is disrespectful. During an interview with the AD on 05/31/2024 at 3:15 p.m., the AD stated mail is not delivered to resident on Saturdays. During an interview with the ABOM on 05/31/2024 at 3:18 p.m., the ABOM stated she and BOM do not work on Saturdays, and that the mail received at facility on Saturdays was left for them to sort and is given to residents on Mondays. During an interview with the Weekend Receptionist on 05/31/2024 at 3:42 p.m., the Weekend Receptionist stated she receives the mail from the postman/woman on Saturdays and was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-31 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide, based on the comprehensive assessment and care plan and the preferences of each resident, an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities for 3 of 22 residents (Residents #14, #48 and #73) reviewed for activities in that: 1. The facility failed to provide Resident #14 activities designed to meet her interests and promote physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. 2. The facility failed to provide Resident #48 activities designed to meet his interests and promote physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. 3. The facility failed to provide Resident #73 activities designed to meet her interests and promote physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. This deficient practice could affect residents at the facility who require assistance to activities to decline in mental acuity due to lack of stimulation, boredom, and depression. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #14's face sheet,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to residents had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other residents for 1 of 8 residents ( Resident #21) reviewed for reasonable accommodations, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #21's call light was within reach. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their needs met Findings include: Record review of Resident #21's face sheet dated 5/28/24 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility 3/14/24 with diagnoses that included: End stage renal disease (disorder when kidneys no longer function on their own), Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (disorder that develops in some people who have experienced a shocking, scary, or dangerous event), and Diabetes Type II (disorder in which body doesn't produce enough insulin or does not use it properly,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the interview and record review, the facility failed to transmit the resident assessment within the required time frame for 1 of the 2 discharged residents (Resident # 89) reviewed for data encoding and transmission, in that: The facility did not submit a discharge not anticipated MDS for Resident #89. This failure could put residents discharged from the facility at risk of not having their assessments transmitted accurately. Findings included: Record review of Resident #89's face sheet, dated 5/31/2024, revealed a [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 3/12/24 with the diagnoses that included: Alzheimer's Disease (a brain disorder that gradually destroys memory, thinking, and learning skills), General Anxiety Disorder (is a condition that causes people to experience excessive, persistent, and unrealistic worry about everyday things), and Hypertension ( when the pressure in your blood vessels is too high (140/90 or higher). Record review of Resident #89's discharge MDS,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I residents with mental illness were provided with a PASRR Evaluation assessment for 1 of 2 residents (Residents #21) reviewed for PASRR screening, in that: Resident #21's PASRR Level 1 assessment did not accurately capture the resident's diagnosis of mental illness. These failures could put residents with inaccurate PASRR Level 1 Evaluations at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs. The findings were: Record review of Resident #21's face sheet, dated 5/28/24, revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility 3/14/24 with diagnoses that included: End stage renal disease (disorder when kidneys no longer function on their own), Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (a disorder that develops in some people who have experienced a shocking, scary, or dangerous event), and Diabetes Type II (disorder in which body doesn't produce enough insulin or does not use it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received proper treatment and care to maintain mobility and good foot health for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #1) reviewed for foot care. The facility failed to provide Resident #1 with access to a podiatrist. The deficient practice placed residents at risk of discomfort, poor foot hygiene, and a decline in resident's physical condition. The findings were: Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 05/28/2024 revealed an [AGE] year old female admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interfere with doing everyday activities), rheumatoid arthritis (an autoimmune disorder that affects the lining of the joints, causing painful swelling), depression (a mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life), and diabetes mellitus (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-22 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public for 6 out of 12 resident rooms (Rooms #203, #207, #211, #213, #225 and #322) and 2 of 4 dining rooms (MC Dining room [ROOM NUMBER] and #3), 1 of 1 nurses' station (200 Wing), and 1 of 3 wings (300 Wing) reviewed for environmental conditions. 1. The ceiling tiles of the 300 Wing contained brown/black colored stains. 2. The floor in Memory Care dining room [ROOM NUMBER] had missing tiles on the floor. 3. The floor in Memory Care dining room [ROOM NUMBER] had debris and food crumbs throughout the floor and the floor was sticky. 4. There were brown colored stains on the ceiling of room [ROOM NUMBER] and #225. 5. The floors in resident rooms #203, #211, #213, and #225 had debris and food crumbs, including under and around beds and fixtures. 6. The floor in the 200 Wing nurses' station contained debris and food crumbs, including under and around…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-22 · tag F0924 — isolatedPut firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to equip corridors with firmly secured handrails for 1 of 4 halls reviewed for environmental conditions. The facility did not ensure a handrail found in the Memory Care unit, across from the dining room was firmly affixed to the wall. This failure could place residents at risk for avoidable accidents and decreased quality of life due to environmental hazards. Findings included: An observation on 3/22/24 at 9:34 am revealed a handrail in the Memory Care unit across from dining rooms #1 and 2 was loose and partially detached from the wall. The handrail appeared to be resting on three brackets which was loosely attached to the wall. During an observation and interview on 3/22/24 at 11:43 am, the MD confirmed the handrail in the Memory Care unit across from dining rooms #1 and 2 was loose and partially detached from the wall and called another maintenance staff on the phone to fix the handrail. The MD said he was not aware that the handrail was loose and partially detached from the wall. An observation and interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-04-06 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to consider the views of a resident group and act promptly upon the grievances and recommendations of such groups concerning issues of resident care and life in the facility for 3 (01/27/23, 02/15/23 and 03/30/23) of 3 Resident Council meetings reviewed for resident group response. The facility failed to have an effective way to resolve the issues with the resident's meals being cold, late and not palatable to meet the resident's dietary needs and preferences. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for weight loss, food borne illnesses and decreased quality of life and psychosocial well- being. Findings Included: Review of the Facility's Meal Service Times revealed, Breakfast 7 am, Lunch 12 pm and Dinner 5 pm. Observation on 04/04/23 at 9:35 am, several residents were eating breakfast or just completed it and Resident #97 was eating breakfast in her room. Observation on 04/06/23 at 1:35 pm, the last lunch meal was served to a resident in their room on the 300 hall. Review of the Resident Council minutes dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents for one (Hall 100 memory care unit) of six halls and the dining rooms observed for environment, in that: The facility failed to ensure the shared bathrooms on Halls 100 (memory care unit) were clean, for Rooms 121,123, 122, 124, 128, 125, 110, 112, 115, 113, 106, 108, 102, 104 and the dining rooms. These failures could place residents at risk for diminished quality of life due to the lack of a well-kept environment and equipment. Findings included: An observation on 04/04/23 at 9:57 a.m. in resident's Rooms and 115 and 113's shared bathroom revealed there was a strong smell of urine with sticky floor tiles. The grout around the base of the toilet was black. The co-base in the bathroom is stained with a brown grimy substance. An observation on 04/04/23 at 10:20 a.m. in dining room on the right side of the hallway revealed handwashing sink with a grimy brown…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-04-06 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food that was palatable, attractive and at a safe and appetizing temperature for eight (Residents #3, #18, #31, #37, #42, #70, #97, and #101) of nine residents reviewed for Palatable food. 1.The facility failed to provide food to the residents in a timely manner which resulted in the resident's food being cold. 2.The facility failed to ensure the resident's food was cooked thoroughly and not undercooked. These failures could place residents at risk for weight loss, food borne illnesses resulting in gastro-intestinal issues, diminished quality of life and psycho-social well- being. Findings included: Review of the Facility's Meal Service Teams revealed, Breakfast 7 am, Lunch 12 pm and Dinner 5 pm. Observation on 04/04/23 at 9:35 am Resident #97 was eating her breakfast and watching TV. Observation on 04/06/23 at 1:35 pm, the last resident on the 300 Hall received their meal. Interview on 04/04/23 at 9:37 am, Resident #97 stated the meals were late at times and was not sure why. Interview on 04/04/23 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designated to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for four (Residents #1, #36, #39, and #90) of six residents reviewed for infection control. LVN A failed to disinfect the glucometer machine (an instrument for measuring the concentration of glucose in the blood) between resident use, for resident #36 and #90. RN B failed to disinfect the blood pressure cuff in between blood pressure checks for Residents #1, #39, and unknown resident. This failure could place residents at-risk of cross contamination which could result in infections or illness. Findings included: Review on 04/05/23 of Resident #1's EHR revealed the resident was an [AGE] year-old female that was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Hypertension, (elevated blood pressure), and congestive heart…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-06 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for two (smoke area and 300 hall) of 13 fire extinguishers, one (on 300 hall) of two portable ice machines, one (main) of two dining areas reviewed for environment. 1.The facility failed to ensure one fire extinguisher located in the patio smoke area and one fire extinguisher located at the end of the 300 hall exit were both fastened and mounted securely to their posts. 2. The facility failed to ensure one of their portable ice machines, the table it sat on and the flooring underneath it was clean that was located behind the 300 hall nurse's station. 3.The facility failed to ensure the facility's Auto floor scrubber was not stored in the main dining room, where the resident ate their meals. 4. The facility failed to ensure one kitchen door, one dishwasher door and the flooring of the kitchen and dishwasher room entrances were cleaned or replaced. These failures placed residents at risk of safety hazards and cross contamination which could…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-08-15 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to post on a daily basis information that included the facility name, current date, total number and actual hours worked by registered nurses, licensed practical or licensed vocational nurses, certified nurse aides directly responsible for resident care per shift and the resident census for 1 of 3 days (08/13/2025) reviewed for posting of required information. The facility failed to post the required current nurse staffing and census information on 08/13/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of not having access to information regarding staffing data and the facility census.The findings included: During an observation on 08/13/2025 from 02:24 p.m. to 02:47 p.m. revealed information regarding the current nurse staffing and census information was not found available in a public posting. During an observation and interview on 08/13/2025 at 02:45 p.m., the DON revealed she also could not locate the daily census and nurse staffing posting. She was observed to ask Receptionist A for the posting location. Receptionist A was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-07-25 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed a to dispose of garbage and refuse properly for 3 of 4 dumpsters (Dumpsters #1, #2 and #3) reviewed for disposal of garbage. The facility failed to ensure:1. Dumpster #1 had a drainage plug that completely covered the drainage hole in the dumpster and the doors were completely shut.2. Dumpster #2 had a drainage plug and the doors were completely shut.3. Dumpster #3 had a drainage plug that completely covered the drainage hole in the dumpster. These deficient practices could place residents at risk for exposure to germs and diseases carried by vermin and rodents. The findings were: 1. Observation on 07/24/2025 at 11:36 AM revealed Dumpster #1 had a drainage hole approximately 2-inches in diameter that was half covered by a piece of metal from inside the dumpster. The other half of the drainage hole was uncovered. The sliding door on the left side of the dumpster was open approximately 4-inches. 2. Observation on 07/24/2025 at 11:37 AM revealed Dumpster #2 had a drainage hole approximately 2-inches in diameter and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$287,359 in federal fines across 5 penalties.
- $16,149 — penalty dated 2025-08-18
- $10,604 — penalty dated 2025-04-25
- $207,019 — penalty dated 2024-08-13
- $44,605 — penalty dated 2024-05-31
- $8,982 — penalty dated 2024-04-18
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CREATIVE SOLUTIONS IN HEALTHCARE — 149 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.7 | -1.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
The other 148 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 148; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| BOWERS, SEAN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 07/01/2024 |
| CISNEROS, ALFRED | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 02/18/2008 |
| COBB, TRAVIS | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 10/05/2022 |
| COOPER, STEPHEN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 11/11/2022 |
| HARDIN, SHERRIE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 09/04/2024 |
| KERZEE, RICHARD | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 09/24/2007 |
| KORENEK, PATRICIA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 05/05/2018 |
| SOECHTING, PAUL | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 11/22/2024 |
| STRACK, JOE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 02/11/2022 |
| HUGGINS, LINDA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 02/01/2023 |
| WILLIG, ZACHARY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2025 |
| THOMPSON, JOHNNY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/01/2024 |
| SAN ANTONIO V ENTERPRISES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/06/2025 |
| BLAKE, GARY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2023 |
| BLAKE, MALISA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 09/01/2023 |
| SCZEPANIK, DUNCAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2025 |
| YALAMURI, RAVIKANTH REDDY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675823. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.