No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Estates Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center

201 Sycamore School Road, Fort Worth, TX 76134 · For profit - Corporation · 141 certified beds · (817) 293-7610 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseResident-funds citation (F0565)4 immediate-jeopardy citations4 immediate-jeopardy citations CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)3 actual-harm citations CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$159,833 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • inspectors cited 4 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 7 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (55) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $159,833 in federal fines (most recent 2026-05-01)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (87%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
201 Sycamore School Rd · (817) 293-7610 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1316 Sycamore School Rd Ste 130 · (817) 293-2441 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
7600 Will Rogers Blvd · (817) 759-6800 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Hallmark Park, 502 Sycamore School Rd · (817) 392-7690 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased21.4%15.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.2%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.8%2.4%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.6%3.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened22.7%14.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication17.1%18.0%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.5%3.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control7.9%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table2.3%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.5%1.5%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine88.6%88.0%79.4%better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.40U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.20hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.20hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 69% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 39% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.221.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.49
RN hours/ resident / day
0.92
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.67
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.08
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.38
RN hoursweekends
86.7%
Total nursing turnover
80.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 141 beds and averages 91.0 residents a day — about 65% occupied, or roughly 50 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.08 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.67 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.57 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.29 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.54 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 87% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-01)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2025-02-14)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

55 citations, most serious first. The 21 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 1 of 24 residents (Resident #17) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure CNA Z did not abuse Resident #17 on 04/30/2026 during incontinent care. An IJ (Immediate Jeopardy) was identified on 04/30/26. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 4:50 PM. While the IJ was removed on 05/01/26, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of potential for more than minimal harm because all staff had not been trained on the plan of removal. This failure could place residents at risk for abuse, physical harm, mental anguish and emotional distress.Findings included: Review of Resident #17's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included heart failure, hypertension (high blood pressure), end stage renal disease (the final permanent state of kidney failure), Alzheimer's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 5 of 6 residents (Residents #1, #2, #3, #8, and #9) reviewed for abuse. 1. The facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided to prevent a physical altercation between Residents #8 and #9 on the facility's memory care unit on 06/17/25 and failed to ensure the nurse on the unit, RN K, had visual access to the residents to be able to intervene timely. Resident #9 punched Resident #8 approximately eight times in the face/head resulting in Resident #8 having an abrasion and swelling on the left side of his face. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was free from verbal abuse when he was verbally abused by CNA #1 on 09/04/25. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3 were free from abuse on 05/13/25 when Resident #2 punched him in the face. The noncompliance was identified as a past non-compliance. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) began on 05/13/25 and ended on 09/05/25. The facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as is possible and each resident received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #8 and Resident #9) reviewed for supervision. The facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided to prevent a physical altercation between Residents #8 and #9 on the facility's memory care unit on 06/17/25 and failed to ensure the nurse on the unit, RN K, had visual access to the residents to be able to intervene timely. Resident #9 punched Resident #8 approximately eight times in the face/head resulting in Resident #8 having an abrasion and swelling on the left side of his face. The noncompliance was identified as a past non-compliance. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) began on 06/17/25 and ended on 06/19/25. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the abbreviated survey began. This failure placed residents at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for two of six residents (Resident #67 and Resident #99) reviewed for accidents. 1. The facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent Resident #99, who had cognitive impairment and resided on the secure unit, from eloping from the facility on 02/03/25 when the resident pried open the window in his room and made it 0.9 miles away from the facility. An Immediate Jeopardy was identified on 02/12/25 at 3:50 PM. While the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 02/14/25, the facility remained out of compliance at the severity level of Potential for more than minimal harm that was not immediate jeopardy and a scope of Isolated due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their plan of removal. 2. The facility failed to provide adequate supervision and assistive devices to Resident #67 on 02/06/25 when he was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's choices for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #67) reviewed for quality of care. RN C failed to assess Resident #67 for a change in condition in a timely manner when he reported he was not feeling well on 02/09/25 at approximately 7:30 AM, and RN C noticed he did not look well and offered to send the resident to the hospital. An IJ was identified on 02/13/25. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 5:20 PM. While the IJ was removed on 02/14/25, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level potential for more than minimal harm that is not Immediate Jeopardy, due to the facility's need to implement corrective systems. These failures could place residents at risk for a delay in treatment or diagnosis, a decline in the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-02-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary treatment and services, based on the comprehensive assessment and consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent development of pressure ulcers for 1 (Resident #67) of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers with use of a wound vacuum. RN C failed to provide Resident #67 with wound care when he reported to her on 02/09/25 at approximately 7:30 AM that he was not feeling well and needed his dressing changed because his wound vac was leaking. RN C did not follow-up with Resident #67 for care until 5:30 PM at which time she discovered she did not have enough supplies to complete wound care. The wound care was not provided for approximately 10 hours after the resident had asked to have the dressing changed, which resulted in resident discomfort and wound drainage getting on the resident, his wheelchair, and bed linens. An IJ was identified on 02/13/25. The IJ template was provided to the facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-01-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents. CNA A failed to get assistance from another staff member when providing Resident #1, who required two staff for assistance with all ADLs, a bed bath on 12/05/24. During the bed bath, CNA A asked Resident #1 to turn to her side. When the resident turned she fell to the floor, which resulted in the resident sustaining a fracture of her right femur (thigh bone). The noncompliance was identified as past noncompliance. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 12/05/24 and ended on 12/05/24. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could place residents at risk for serious injury or harm, decline in health, and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from abuse and neglect for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #1 and Resident # 2) reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility failed to prevent Resident #3 from physically abusing Resident #2, when Resident #3 punched Resident #2 in the face on 08/24/23. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was free from abuse and neglect by not providing adequate supervision and services, when the facility allowed Resident #3, who had a history of physically assaulting residents and staff, to continue to reside in the facility. Resident #3 assaulted Resident #1 on 12/08/23, which caused her to be hospitalized with a subdural hematoma (is a type of brain bleed that results in a tear in a blood vessel below the dura mater, a membrane layer between the brain and the skull), contusion of face (small blood vessels get torn and leak blood under the skin), neck sprain, and closed fracture of transverse process (broken…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 3 of 6 residents (Resident #4, Resident #6, and Resident #7) reviewed for abuse. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4 was free from emotional and mental abuse. Video footage identified CNA A antagonizing Resident #4 when she went to check on him on 02/18/25 . The noncompliance was identified as past noncompliance (PNC). The noncompliance began on 02/18/25 and ended on 02/19/25. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the investigation began. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #6, and Resident #7 were free from abuse on 03/11/25 when Resident #6 verbally abused Resident #7 which cause Resident #7 to physically abuse Resident #6 by hitting him on the face. The noncompliance was identified as past noncompliance (PNC). The noncompliance began on 03/11/25 and ended on 03/14/25. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the investigation began. These failures could place residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible and provide supervision to prevent avoidable accidents for 1 (Resident #5) of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. The facility failed to keep Resident #5 free of accidents after his anti-tippers were removed from his wheelchair during his dialysis treatment on 04/01/25 when he was on the van's lift and fell backwards, hitting his head on the grate of the lift and sustaining an injury. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The noncompliance began on 04/01/25 and ended on 04/02/25. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could place residents at risk of severe injury, hospitalization, and decline in quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #5's admission Record, dated 05/01/25, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male who was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], readmitted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents. Staff failed to ensure Resident #1 did not receive a burn blister to her left wrist on 08/09/24 when she was drinking coffee from the dining room and spilled it on herself. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The noncompliance began on 08/09/24 and ended on 08/09/24. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This deficient practice could affect residents at the facility who drank hot liquids that could cause burns from the facility's kitchen. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's admission record, dated 08/21/24, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #1's admission MDS Assessment, dated 07/06/24, reflected she had a BIMS score of 07, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Further…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program, including hand hygiene, designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment, and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for infection control practices. While providing Resident #1, who was on EBP due to having a feeding tube and urinary catheter, with incontinence care, CNA A failed to wear a gown and failed to secure her identification lanyard badge, which resulted in the badge touching the resident's perineal area, buttocks, and feces.These failures could place residents at risk of cross-contamination and infections. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet, dated 06/17/26, revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed he had the following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure resident records were accurately documented for 17 of 86 residents (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, and #17) reviewed for resident records. The facility failed to ensure on 06/03/26 CNA A did not use CNA B's log in credentials when she documented care provided for Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, and #17.This failure could place residents at risk of inaccurate reporting of their care. Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's EHR revealed CNA care for 06/03/26 documented by CNA-B. Record review of the facility's staffing for 06/03/26 revealed CNA-B was not working. CNA-A was working the 100 Hall where Resident #1 resided. Record review of Resident #2's EHR also reflected CNA care for 06/03/26 documented by CNA-BRecord review for the 15 remaining residents, Residents #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, and #17, who resided on 100 Hall revealed the same documentation as being completed by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-01 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a private meeting space for the residents' monthly council meetings for 15 of 15 confidential residents reviewed for resident council. The facility failed to provide a private space for resident council meetings.This failure could place residents, who attended resident council meetings, at risk of not being able to voice concerns due to a lack of privacy. Findings included:Observation and interview on 04/29/26 at 9:30 AM during a confidential resident group meeting with 12 residents, revealed the resident council meetings were held once a month in the dining room. There were two entrances to the dining room, and both doors were closed and the Activity Director posted do not enter signs on each door. During the meeting three staff members entered the dining room even with the signs posted on the door. The residents stated being interrupted during their resident council meetings was a frequent occurrence and they felt like they could not speak freely with the staff interruptions. Interview on 04/30/26…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as is possible and each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 3 (Residents #7, #23, and #97) of 18 residents reviewed for smoking.The facility failed to follow their smoking policy when Residents #7, #23, and #97 were observed to be smoking on the patio without supervision.This failure placed residents at risk of harm and/or serious injury.Findings included: Review of Resident #7's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility 12/16/25. The resident's diagnoses included heart disease, heart failure, hypertension (high blood pressure), and depression. Resident #7 had a BIMS score of 11 which indicated her cognition was moderately impaired. Review of Resident #7's smoking assessment updated 05/01/26 reflected the resident was safe to smoke. The smoking assessment further reflected the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 (Resident #10) of 8 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans.The facility failed to ensure Resident #10's care plan addressed resident's behavior of picking at her face.This failure could place residents at risk of not having their individual needs met, not receiving necessary care and services, and a decreased quality of life. The findings include:Record review of Resident #10's admission MDS Assessment, dated 02/11/26, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #10's diagnoses included multiple sclerosis (autoimmune condition that affects your brain and spinal cord), chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-01 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was fed by enteral means received appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #11) reviewed for feeding tubes.RN D failed to follow physician orders and added the wrong amount of water during the flush to Resident #11's formula g-tube (device inserted through the belly into the stomach to deliver nutrition, fluids, and medications) during the feeding on 04/30/26. This failure could place residents at risk for a decline in health or adverse effects due to inappropriate management of G-tube care.Findings included:Review of Resident #11's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included aphasia (language disorder caused by brain damage that impairs speaking, understanding, reading, writing), stroke, hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), and cerebral infarction…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 1 of 5 carts reviewed for medication storage. LVN-A failed to secure her medication cart prior to walking away from it on 04/28/26. This failure could place residents at risk of accessing medications not prescribed for them. Observation on 04/28/26 at 5:30 a.m. a medication cart located outside the only nurses' station was unlocked. All drawers were able to be opened, and multiple prescription and over the counter medications were in the drawers. In an interview on 04/28/26 at 5:33 a.m. LVN-A stated she had walked away for just a minute to talk with someone. She stated she knew her cart should have been locked prior to walking away but did not think she was going to be gone very long and most of the residents were still in bed. She stated the risk of leaving the cart unlocked was residents accessing medications not prescribed for them. In an interview on 04/30/26 at 9:39…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 (Resident #4) of 8 residents reviewed for infection controlStaff left a graduated cylinder, used to measure urine output, on the resident's bedside table. This failure could cause cross contamination from an unclean item to the clean items on the bedside table. Findings included:Observation on 04/28/26 at 8:38 a.m. Resident #4's bedside table contained her water cup, hairbrush, her book, and a graduated cylinder with traces of a yellow liquid at the bottom.In an interview on 4/28/26 at 8:38 a.m. Resident #4 stated the cylinder was used to measure the urine from her urinary catheter collection bag. She stated it had been left on her bedside table a couple of other times in the past. She stated she had asked the CNAs not to put it there, but they forget and do it anyway. Resident #4 stated she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to immediately consult with the resident's physician when there was a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) facility reviewed for nutrition. The facility failed to immediately notify the physician when Resident #1's weight showed a 15.9% loss from 02/10/26-03/09/26. This failure could place residents at risk for malnutrition or mismanagement of underlying medical conditions.Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's Annual MDS Assessment, dated 03/15/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. He had a BIMS score of 9, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Section I-Active Diagnoses reflected Resident # 1's active diagnoses included non-Alzheimer's Dementia (brain disorder that affects memory, thinking, and behavior), Parkinson's Disease ( progressive movement disorder of the nervous system), depression (a mood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-24 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for assessments. The MDS Nurse failed to ensure Resident #1's annual MDS assessment, updated on 03/15/26, was accurate and reflected the resident's recent significant weight loss. This failure could place residents at risk for missed care needs and continued decline in health.Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's Annual MDS Assessment, dated 03/15/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. He had a BIMS score of 9, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Section I-Active Diagnoses reflected Resident # 1's active diagnoses included non-Alzheimer's Dementia (brain disorder that affects memory, thinking, and behavior), Parkinson's Disease (progressive movement disorder of the nervous system), depression (a mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness and loss of interest),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 34 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for Resident #1 to address the resident's recent significant weight loss. This failure could place residents at risk for missed care needs and continued decline in health.Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's Annual MDS Assessment, dated 03/15/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. He had a BIMS score of 9, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Section I-Active Diagnoses reflected Resident # 1's active diagnoses included non-Alzheimer's Dementia (brain disorder that affects memory, thinking, and behavior),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure, based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for 1 of 10 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to treat Resident #2's constipation as ordered by the physician.This failure could place residents at risk of developing an obstruction, or a rupture of the intestines. Findings include:Record review of Resident #2's admission MDS assessment, dated 01/14/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #2 had diagnoses which included diabetes, amputation of both legs above the knees, heart failure, and constipation . His BIMS score was 15, which indicated he was cognitively intact. His Functional Ability assessment indicated he needed partial assistance with toileting. Record review of Resident #2's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-24 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that each resident maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range and electrolyte balance, unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrated that this was not possible or resident preferences indicated otherwise for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) facility reviewed for nutrition. The facility failed to recognize, evaluate and address Resident #1's weight loss when there was a documented 15.9 % loss from 02/10/26-03/09/26. This failure could place residents at risk for malnutrition or mismanagement of underlying medical conditions.Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's Annual MDS Assessment, dated 03/15/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. He had a BIMS score of 9, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Section I-Active Diagnoses reflected Resident # 1's active diagnoses included non-Alzheimer's Dementia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 5 residents (Residents #9) reviewed for environment. 1. LVN-W, CNA-R, and MA failed to ensure the linen cart located on the 100 hall was covered when not in use. 2. LVN-W and CNA-U failed to properly discard a red biohazard bag, after providing care when the bag was left in the hallway of Hall 300 outside Resident #9's room. This deficient practice placed staff and residents at risk for infections and human body fluids.Findings included:During an observation and interview on 09/01/2025 at 1:15 PM revealed the clean linen cart located on Hall 100 had the cover up and over the top of the cart, which left the linen exposed to the environment and contamination. LVN-W and MA were observed working on the hall and passing the linen cart. The MA stated the cart was left by CNA-R, who…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for 2 of 4 residents (Residents #1 and #2) reviewed for accuracy of assessments. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 and Resident #2's MDS assessments were accurate and coded for behavior and mood. This failure could place residents at risk for receiving inadequate care and services based on an inaccurate assessment. Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 09/19/2025 reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male, who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The face sheet reflected he was discharged on 09/17/2025 to the hospital. The resident's current diagnoses included: Chronic Respiratory Failure, Unspecified Whether with Hypoxia or Hypercapnia (a condition where the lungs fail to adequately exchange oxygen and carbon dioxide over a prolonged period) Need for Assistance with Personal Care (staff assistance with ADL's); Anxiety (fear and worrying)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents, who needed respiratory care, were provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 2 of 4 residents (Residents #4 and #8) reviewed for respiratory care. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4's nasal cannula and tubing were bagged when not in use. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #8's CPAP mask was bagged when not in use. These failures could place residents at risk for respiratory infection. Findings included:Record review of Resident #4's face sheet dated 09/19/2025 reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old-female, who admitted to the facility on [DATE] and initially on 04/10/2025. The resident's diagnoses included: Heart Failure, asthma (chronic lung condition that causes inflammation in the airway) and COPD (an ongoing lung condition caused by damage to the lungs. The damage results…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections, for 3 of 7 residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure Residents #1, #2 and #3, who were on Enhanced Barrier Precautions, received proper care from staff donning and doffing personal protective equipment for infection control. This failure could place residents at risk for the spread of infections and decreased quality of life. Findings included:Resident #1 Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 10/10/25, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses that included: metabolic encephalopathy (change in brain function due to systemic illness), heart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received appropriate monitoring of his condition after the resident refused three consecutive dialysis treatments on 10/04/25, 10/07/25, and 10/09/25. This failure placed residents at risk of a delay in medical evaluation and treatment, which could result in worsening of conditions. Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 10/10/25, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses that included: metabolic encephalopathy (change in brain function due to systemic illness), heart failure, candidiasis (fungal infection), chronic kidney disease, dependence…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-10 · tag F0644 — pattern
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to incorporate the recommendations from the PASRR Level II determination and the PASRR evaluation report into a resident's assessment, care planning, and transitions of care for 2 of 4 residents reviewed (Residents #2 and #5) for PASRR assessments.1.The facility failed to submit a NFSS form, used to request specialized services for residents, request within 20 from interdisciplinary team meeting dated 03/18/25 for Resident #2. 2. The facility failed to submit a completed a NFSS in the LTC Online Portal within 20 business days of Resident #5's IDT meeting. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving or benefiting from recommendations for services they may require. Findings included:1. Record review of Resident #2's most recent Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #2 had moderate cognitive impairment with a BIMS score of 8. The resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse were reported immediately to the Administrator of the facility for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for reporting abuse and neglect. LVN B failed to report an allegation of verbal abuse to the Administrator, on 09/05/25 when CNA used profanity towards Resident #1. This failure could have resulted in psychological harm to residents. Findings included: Record review of resident #1's face sheet dated 09/09/25, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male with an admission date of 09/04/21 and readmitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #1's Annual MDS, dated [DATE], reflected he had a BIMS score of 15, indicating no cognitive impairment. His diagnoses included Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (A long-term condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar), Chronic Pain Syndrome (Condition characterized by persistent pain lasting longer than 3-6 months, often accompanied…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure the accurate dispensing and administering of all drugs, to meet the needs of each resident for 2 of 3 residents (Residents #2 and #3) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to maintain accurate documentation regarding the administration of Resident #2 and Resident #3's PRN pain medication and failed to ensure LVN C checked the current physician's orders before administering the PRN pain medication, Hydrocodone/acetaminophen 10/325 mg, to Resident #2 on 01/06/25 when the resident had opioid restrictions. The failure placed residents at risk for possible drug overdose and complications. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 03/25/25, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmission on [DATE] with a BIMS score of 09 revealing her cognation was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-14 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who required dialysis received such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 2 of 2 residents (Residents #9 and #63) reviewed for dialysis. The facility failed to ensure dialysis communication forms for Residents #9 and Resident #63 were received back from dialysis center after returning from dialysis treatment on the dates mentioned below. The missing communication forms for Resident #9 totaling to 10 days on the following dates: 01/01/25, 01/03/25, 01/06/25, 01/08/25, 01/10/25, and 01/17/25, 02/03/25, 02/05/25, 02/07/25 and 02/10/25. Resident #63 was missing communication forms totaling to 12 days on the following dates: 01/01/25, 01/03/25, 01/06/25, 01/08/25, 01/10/25, 1/20/25,1/24/25, 01/29/25, 02/03/25, 02/05/25, 02/07/25 and 02/10/25. This failure could place residents at risk of inadequate communication between the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident on one of three medication carts (300) and 3 of 3 residents (Residents #7,#147, and #178) reviewed for pharmacy services. 1. The facility failed to ensure the 300 Hall nurses' medication cart contained accurate narcotic logs for Resident #7, #147 and #178 on 02/12/25. 2. The facility failed to ensure expired medications , 1 bottles of atropine 0.1% with expiration dates of August 2024 was removed and destroyed form 300 hall nurses cart on 02/12/25. These failures could place residents at risk for medication errors, drug diversion, and ineffective drug therapy. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident# 7's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 12/10/24, reflected the resident was [AGE] year-old female readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to immediately consult with the physician of a significant change in the resident's health status; or a need to alter treatment significantly for 1 (Resident #67) of 3 residents reviewed for notification of change. RN C failed to immediately notify the physician that Resident #67 came to the nursing station and stated to RN C that he was not feeling well. RN C stated Resident #67 looked pale, he looked sick. This failure could place residents at risk for delay in treatment, a negative outcome to a resident's physical, mental, and psychosocial health, well-being, or decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #67's face sheet reflected the resident was a [AGE] year old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #67's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 11/28/24, reflected a BIMS score of 14, which indicated his cognition was intact. His diagnoses included paraplegia (the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving neglect were reported to the State Survey Agency in a timely manner for 1 (Resident #67) of three residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. The Administrator failed to report Resident #67 fell backwards in his wheelchair (which had not anti-tippers or brakes), hitting his head on the floor of the van during takeoff in the facility parking lot. Resident #67 was sent to hospital resulting in initial encounter with head injury and contusion of right hand. Resident #67 stated his wheelchair was not strapped down correctly and stated he blacked out. The failure could place residents at risk of serious harm or neglect. Findings included: Record review of Resident #67's face sheet reflected the resident was a [AGE] year old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #67's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 11/28/24, reflected a BIMS score of 14, which indicated his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to investigate and report allegation of neglect for 1 (Resident #67) of 3 residents reviewed for accidents and hazards. The Administrator failed to investigate and report the results of the investigation to the state agency when Resident #67 fell backwards in his wheelchair (which had not anti-tippers or brakes), hitting his head on the floor of the van during takeoff in the facility parking lot. Resident #67 was sent to hospital resulting in initial encounter with head injury and contusion of right hand. Resident #67 stated his wheelchair was not strapped down correctly and stated he blacked out. This failure could place residents at risk of harm and injuries related to neglect and a delay in investigating. Findings include: Record review of Resident #67's face sheet reflected the resident was [AGE] years old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #67's quarterly MDS assessment,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored securely and had acceptable labeling for one (Halls 200 nurses Medication Cart) of three medication carts reviewed for labeling and storage. The facility failed on 02/12/25 to ensure insulin vials were dated after they were opened and were not dated with wrong dates located on the medication cart for the 200 hall. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the therapy needed. Findings included: Observation on 02/12/25 at 1:55 PM of the nurses' medication cart used for Hall 200 back with RN C revealed one insulin vial of Humalog 100 unit/ml which was opened, partially used, and not labeled with the open date. There was also one vial of Levemir dated 5/11/25 that had been opened and partially used on the cart. Interview on 02/12/25 at 2:38 PM with RN C, who was the charge nurse for Halls 200 , revealed she knew insulin pens/vials were supposed to be dated once they were opened or after they were removed from the refrigerator and placed on the cart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-14 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to provide specialized rehabilitative services for 1 (Resident #2) of 3 residents reviewed for specialized rehabilitative services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 received a speech therapy evaluation as per physician orders dated 01/28/25. This failure could place residents with orders for therapy at risk of not meeting their highest practicable well-being. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's Nursing Home Comprehensive Item Set MDS dated [DATE] reflected Resident #2's initial admission date of 07/27/21 and readmission date of 04/13/22. Resident #2's diagnoses were non-traumatic brain dysfunction, non-Alzheimer's dementia (common type of dementia), malnutrition, and aphasia (rare type of dementia where language is heavily affected). Resident #2's MDS also reflected that Resident #2 had severe cognitive impairment. MDS reflected that Resident #2 began receiving occupational therapy in 10/17/24 with no end date. MDS did not reflect…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's comprehensive person-centered care plan was not implemented and did not include measurable outcomes related to signs and symptoms of dehydration such as decreased or no urine output, concentrated urine, strong odor, tenting skin, cracked lips, furrowed tongue, new onset confusion, dizziness on sitting/standing, increased pulse, headache, fatigue/weakness, dizziness, fever, thirst, recent/sudden weight loss, dry/sunken eyes. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their individual needs met, not receiving necessary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident who was incontinent of bladder with an indwelling catheter received appropriate treatment and services for 1 of 2 residents (Residents #1) reviewed for incontinent care and for indwelling urinary catheters. The facility they failed to monitor and document signs and symptoms of dehydration, decreased or no urine output, for Resident#1. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their individual needs met, not receiving necessary care and services, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission record dated 10/04/24 reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male, who initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission on [DATE]. Resident#1's diagnoses included intellectual disability, acquired absence of right leg below the knee, anemia chronic kidney disease, Type 2 diabetes mellitus with unspecified complications, protein calorie…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments for 1 of 6 medication carts located on hall 200 observed for drug storage. 1. The facility failed to ensure one medication cart found on 200 hall was not left unlocked and unattended by LVN A on at 10/04/24 at 12:30 PM. 2. The facility failed to ensure one medication cart found on 200 hall was not left unlocked and unattended by LVN B on 10/05/24 at 9:26 PM. This failure could place residents at risk of access and ingestion medications. Findings included: Observation on 10/04/24 at 12:30 PM revealed one medication cart on Hall 200 was unlocked and unattended with the drawers facing the hallway. At 12:45 PM, the DON walked past the medication cart on Hall 200 hall and locked it. Observation on 10/05/24 at 9:10 PM revealed LVN B drove up to the facility at the same time as the surveyor and they walked into the building together. At 9:26 PM, the medication cart on Hall 200 was unlocked and unattended with the drawers facing the hallway.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-01 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for 1 of 10 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for call lights. Resident #2's call light was not within reach. The call button was on the other side of the privacy curtain draped over a vacant bed. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their needs and preferences met and a decreased quality of life. Finding included: Record review of Resident #2's Face Sheet dated 10/01/2024, reflected the resident was an [AGE] year-old female who was originally admitted to the facility at 07/16/2024. Diagnoses included: Unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance (a group of symptoms that may affect, memory, thinking and interferes with daily life), lack of coordination, anemia (deficiency of healthy red blood cells in the blood), hypothyroidism (decreased productions of thyroid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 (Resident #1) of 10 residents reviewed for accidents. The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #1 was safe from accidents and hazards when she fell from her bed on 09/28/2024 and was found face down on the floor with a bruise on her forehead. Resident #1 did not have a fall mat placed on both sides of her bed. This failure could place residents at risk of injury and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet dated 10/01/2024, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female who was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included: Alzheimer's disease (brain disorder worsening over time), dysphasia (impacts the ability to speak and understand spoken language), and unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance (a group of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 shower rooms (Shower room [ROOM NUMBER]) observed for accident and hazards. The facility failed to ensure two disposable razors in Shower room [ROOM NUMBER] were kept out of reach of residents. These failures could place residents at risk for injury. Findings included: Observation and interview on 06/05/24 at 12:35 PM with CNA A of Shower room [ROOM NUMBER], which was to the right of the nursing station, revealed two navy blue disposable razors on top of the sharps container, within reach of residents to access. According to CNA A, razors were locked in a closet in the shower room. After use, the razors were supposed to be discarded in the sharps container. CNA A stated leaving razors on top of the sharps container placed residents at risk of taking the razors for personal use. CNA A stated if residents used razors without supervision,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-05 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview, the facility failed to designate a registered nurse to serve as the director of nursing on a full time basis for 53 of 65 days (04/13/24-06/05/24) reviewed for DON coverage. The facility failed to designate a RN to serve as DON on a full-time basis since 04/12/24. The failure placed residents at risk of not receiving necessary care and services. Findings included: Interview on 06/05/24 at 3:15 PM with the Administrator revealed the last time the facility had a dedicated DON was on 04/12/24. She stated she had interviewed applicants, but she had not hired anyone yet. Currently the DON responsibilities were being divided up between the ADON, the MDS Coordinator, and the Regional Compliance Nurse. None of the three people were dedicated to the DON position 8 hours a day. The Administrator stated she did not have a policy about DON coverage. Interview on 06/05/24 at 3:30 PM with the ADON revealed she and the MDS Coordinator and the Regional Compliance Nurse were covering for the DON. She stated they were also all performing their regular duties as well.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 9 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure hospital discharge orders were followed for Resident #1 to have a follow-up appointment with a primary care physician. This failure could affect residents who receive care from the facility and place them at risk for worsening conditions. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 01/30/24, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female resident who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, abnormalities of gait and mobility, cognitive communication deficit, muscle weakness, lack of coordination, history of falling, abnormal posture, muscle wasting and atrophy (loss of muscle tissue), dementia, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 3 ice chests observed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure the ice chests were maintained in a manner to prevent cross-contamination. 2. The facility failed to ensure staff personal food items were not stored in the facility's medication refrigerator in the facility's medication storage. These failures placed residents at risk for the development and spread of infection. Findings included: Observation on 01/03/24 at 9:00 AM revealed the facility had three halls and a secured unit. The three halls each had an ice chest, with ice for the residents' drink cups, located where staff and residents had access to them. Observation on 01/04/24 at 9:10 AM revealed Resident #29 filled his drink cup with ice from the 100 Hall ice chest, using the scoop provided, but placing the scoop…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality for 1 (Resident #61) of 17 residents reviewed for dignity. The facility failed to ensure a WanderGuard device was not placed on Resident #61 when the resident was not an elopement risk. The failure placed residents at risk of decreased quality of life and lowered self-esteem. Findings included: Record review of Resident #61's face sheet dated 01/07/24 revealed the resident was an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included neuropathy (damaged nerves resulting in numbness, burning, or pain in relation to whichever part of the body is damaged), aphasia (language disorder affecting ability to communicate), and chronic kidney disease. Record review of Resident #61's MDS assessment, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately consult with the physician of a significant change in the resident's health status; or a need to alter treatment significantly for 1 (Resident #168) of 4 residents reviewed for notification of change. The facility failed to notify Resident #168's physician that the resident's insulin had been discontinued by the hospital or that the resident had returned from the hospital and failed to follow-up with the physician to obtain new orders. The failure placed residents at risk of not having medical complications and deterioration. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 01/05/24 indicated the resident was an [AGE] year-old female, initially admitted on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included pneumonia, diabetes mellitus with ketoacidosis (potentially life threatening complication of diabetes), dehydration, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (not able to keep oxygen and carbon…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 8 residents (Residents #166) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The ADON failed to ensure Resident #166's care plan was updated to include her use of a Life Vest. This failure could place the residents at risk of deterioration and improper care. Findings included: Review of Resident #166's undated admission Record revealed Resident #166 was [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included heart failure, atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat), muscle wasting atrophy (decrease in size and muscle wasting), Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, hypotension and hypertension (high and low blood pressure), unsteadiness on feet, lack of coordination. Review of Resident #166's admission MDS assessment, dated 12/22/23, revealed the resident's BIMS score was blank. Her Functional Status indicated she substantially/ maximum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-05 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain vision abilities for 1 (Resident #45) of 23 residents reviewed for vision services. The facility did not address Resident #45's vision loss and ensure Resident #45 was seen by an ophthalmologist. This failure could place all residents with vision loss at risk of not receiving proper services, decreased ability to communicate and/or a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #45's face sheet revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included stroke, congestive heart failure, and kidney failure. Record review of Resident #45's MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident had a BIMS score of 13 indicating the resident was cognitively intact and capable to discuss his own plan of care. Resident's MDS also revealed that Resident #45 requires supervision assistance by one person with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments for 1 (Resident #57) of 17 residents reviewed for drug storage. LVN A left two medications at the bedside of Resident #57. This failure could place residents at risk of taking medications not prescribed for them. Findings included: Review of Resident #57's undated admission Record revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included schizophrenia, emphysema, muscle weakness and heart attack. Review of Resident #57's annual MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 9 indicating she was mildly cognitively impaired. Her Functional Status indicated she required limited assistance with her ADLs. Review of Resident #57's care plan, dated 1/03/24, revealed she was at risk of altered breathing status related to her emphysema, with interventions of administering her inhaled medications as prescribed. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-05 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment was in safe operating condition for 1 (Resident #22) of 6 residents reviewed for safe, functional equipment. The facility failed to ensure Resident #22's bed was in proper working condition. This failure could place residents at risk for skin tears, injury, falls and discomfort during transfers. Findings included: Record review of Resident #22's face sheet dated 01/05/24 indicated Resident #22 was a [AGE] year-old male and originally admitted on [DATE], readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including acquired absence of right leg below the knee, age-related physical debility (affects the persons physical mobility), muscle weakness, lack of coordination, chronic pain, acute pyelonephritis (sudden and severe kidney inflammation due to bacterial infection) Hypertension (high blood pressure), Diabetes Mellitus (high sugar levels). Record review of Resident #22's quarterly MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents has the right to be free from abuse for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure LVN A did not verbally abuse Resident #1 during their interactions on 08/04/23. This failure placed the resident at risk of decreased feelings of self-worth. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's admission Record revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included stroke affecting his right side, bipolar disorder, Moyamoya disease (a rare progressive cerebrovascular disorder caused by blocked arteries at the base of the brain [basal ganglia]), and seizures. Review of Resident #1's annual MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 15 indicating he was cognitively intact. His Functional Status indicated he required extensive assistance with his ADLs. Review of Resident #1's care plan, dated 07/01/23, revealed he required assistance with most of his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$159,833 in federal fines across 8 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $10,661 — penalty dated 2026-05-01
  • $17,644 — penalty dated 2025-09-10
  • $12,295 — penalty dated 2025-05-01
  • $12,295 — penalty dated 2025-05-01
  • $64,457 — penalty dated 2025-02-14
  • $16,391 — penalty dated 2025-01-13
  • $10,238 — penalty dated 2024-08-21
  • $15,852 — penalty dated 2023-12-13
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-03-19 for 2 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CREATIVE SOLUTIONS IN HEALTHCARE — 149 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.7-1.7 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.1-0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.2+0.8 vs chain
The other 148 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)
1 of 5Afton Oaks Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterHouston, TX 1 of 5Arlington Heights Health and Rehabilitation CenterFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Beltline Healthcare CenterGarland, TX 1 of 5Bluebonnet Nursing & RehabilitationKarnes City, TX 1 of 5Bluebonnet Point WellnessBullard, TX 1 of 5Brentwood Terrace Healthcare And RehabilitationParis, TX 1 of 5Buena Vida Nursing and Rehab-San AntonioSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Cottonwood Nursing & RehabilitationDenton, TX 1 of 5Countryview Nursing & RehabilitationTerrell, TX 1 of 5Dogwood Trails ManorWoodville, TX 1 of 5Downtown Health and Rehabilitation CenterFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Fair Park Health & Rehabilitation CenterDallas, TX 1 of 5Five Points Nursing & Rehabilitation of College StCollege Station, TX 1 of 5Five Points at Lake Highlands Nursing and RehabDallas, TX 1 of 5Five Points of PflugervillePflugerville, TX 1 of 5Franklin Heights Nursing & RehabilitationEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Gilmer Nursing & RehabilitationGilmer, TX 1 of 5Grace Pointe Wellness CenterEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Graham Oaks Care CenterGraham, TX 1 of 5Granbury Care CenterGranbury, TX 1 of 5Greenhill VillasMount Pleasant, TX 1 of 5Heritage At Longview Healthcare CenterLongview, TX 1 of 5Huebner Creek Health & Rehabilitation CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Interlochen Health and Rehabilitation CenterArlington, TX 1 of 5Kenedy Health & RehabilitationKenedy, TX 1 of 5Kennedy Health & RehabLufkin, TX 1 of 5Lake Lodge Nursing & RehabilitationLake Worth, TX 1 of 5Lampstand Nursing and RehabilitationBryan, TX 1 of 5Lancaster Nursing & RehabilitationLancaster, TX 1 of 5Marine Creek Nursing & RehabilitationFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Mesa Vista Inn Health CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Mountain View Health & RehabilitationEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Navasota Nursing & RehabilitationNavasota, TX 1 of 5Normandy Terrace Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5North Pointe Nursing and RehabilitationWatauga, TX 1 of 5Park Place Care CenterGeorgetown, TX 1 of 5Parkview Manor Nursing and RehabilitationWeimar, TX 1 of 5Peach Tree PlaceWeatherford, TX 1 of 5Pebble Creek Nursing CenterEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Pecan Tree Rehab And Healthcare CenterGainesville, TX

Showing 40 of 148; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
WEST WHARTON COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICTOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/01/2023
BOWERS, SEANIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 07/01/2024
CISNEROS, ALFREDIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 02/18/2008
COBB, TRAVISIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 10/05/2022
COOPER, STEPHENIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 11/11/2022
HARDIN, SHERRIEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 09/04/2024
KERZEE, RICHARDIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 09/24/2007
KORENEK, PATRICIAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 05/05/2018
SOECHTING, PAULIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 11/22/2024
STRACK, JOEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 02/11/2022
THOMPSON, JOHNNYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2024
FORT WORTH V ENTERPRISES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/10/2025
BLAKE, GARYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2023
BLAKE, MALISAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/01/2023
HUGGINS, LINDAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/01/2023
JAMAL, SYEDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
ROMERO, BRADLEYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
WILLIG, ZACHARYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-29.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 77%Medicare 4%Other / private 20%

About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$265per resident / day
operating cost
$8,043per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$205per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675028. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-01, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next