Marine Creek Nursing & Rehabilitation
3600 Angle Ave, Fort Worth, TX 76106 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 164 certified beds · (817) 624-6164 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0607) — most recent Sep 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $23,621 in federal fines (most recent 2024-06-28)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (94%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 14.8% | 15.8% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.9% | 3.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.4% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.1% | 2.4% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.2% | 3.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 13.6% | 14.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 18.7% | 18.0% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.3% | 3.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 12.6% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 88.0% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.8% | 25.7% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 0.0% | 12.3% | 12.0% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.62 | 2.17 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.53 | 2.06 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
36.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 44 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 28.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 34% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 36.9%CMS range 24.3–53.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.1%CMS range 6.5–14.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 28.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 33.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 28.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 95.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.8%CMS range 4.4–12.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.11 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 164 beds and averages 125.5 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 38 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.47 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.61 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.04 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.85 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.72 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.63 to 0.56 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 94% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
45 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 29 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-06-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who needed respiratory care, including tracheostomy care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for one (Resident #1) of eight residents reviewed for tracheostomy care. The facility failed to use the recommended amount of pressure (maximum of 25 cmH2O) per manufacturer to inflate Resident #1's tracheostomy tube cuff, which led to chronic over inflation and caused remodeling of the residents T1 and T2 vertebra and swallowing difficulty that likely caused starvation ketoacidosis (metabolic state after prolonged deprivation of glucose as primary source of energy). An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 06/27/24. An IJ Template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 3:30 PM. While the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 06/28/24 at 3:23 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm due to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-04-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents in the facility were free from neglect for 1 (Resident #1) of 6 residents reviewed for neglect. Student Nurse Aide A, who worked the 2:00 PM-10:00 PM shift, failed to report to the charge nurse when she found Resident #1 on the floor on 04/09/24 at 9:46 PM resulting in the resident not receiving immediate treatment and care until 4:40 AM on 04/10/24, when 10:00 PM-6:00 AM staff, discovered significant bruising and injury to the resident's face/head. This failure resulted in the resident not being assessed by a nurse, not having neurological checks performed, not receiving monitoring for possible serious injury, and the physician not being notified for approximately six hours after the fall when the resident was discovered to have significant bruising and injury to the right side of her face and head. The facility failed to ensure Student Nurse Aide A knew what to do when a resident was found on floor. An Immediate Jeopardy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-04-14 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their written policies and procedures to prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property for 1 of 5 residents (Residents #1) reviewed for abuse and neglect. Student Nurse Aide A, who worked the 2:00 PM-10:00 PM shift, failed to report to the charge nurse when she found Resident #1 on the floor on 04/09/24 at 9:46 PM resulting in the resident not receiving immediate treatment and care until 4:40 AM on 04/10/24, when 10:00 PM-6:00 AM staff, discovered significant bruising and injury to the resident's face/head. This failure resulted in the resident not being assessed by a nurse, not having neurological checks performed, not receiving monitoring for possible serious injury, and the physician not being notified for approximately six hours after the fall when the resident was discovered to have significant bruising and injury to the right side of her face and head. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-04-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an environment that was free of accident hazards and that each resident received adequate supervision to prevent elopement for 1 of 3 residents (Residents #1) reviewed for supervision. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1, who had severe cognitive impairment and resided on the secure unit, received adequate supervision to prevent her from wandering into the facility's enclosed courtyard without staff knowledge and being left outside for approximately 3 hours while it was raining. The facility failed to ensure the door that led to the enclosed courtyard was locked or supervised, when the door's locking mechanism lost power during the storm. The noncompliance was identified as past non-compliance. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) began on 04/01/24 and ended on 04/02/24. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure placed residents at risk of harm and/or serious injury. Findings included: Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to be free from abuse for 2 (Resident #45 and Resident #23) of 2 residents reviewed for abuse, in that: On 08/29/2025, the facility failed to ensure that Resident #45 was not punched in the face by Resident #23, resulting in injury to the face.This failure resulted in injuries to Resident #45.Resident #45Record review of a face sheet dated 09/03/2025 revealed Resident #45 was [AGE] years old and was admitted on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (muscle weakness of one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting left non-dominant side, and other pertinent diagnoses including cognitive communication deficit and mood disorder due to known physiological condition with major depressive-like episode.Record review of Resident #45's MDS dated [DATE] reflected a BIMs score of 15. The residents mood interview revealed he had felt…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-11-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who enters the facility with an indwelling catheter or subsequently receives one, based on the resident's comprehensive assessment, receives appropriate treatment and services for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #1) reviewed for incontinence. The facility failed to ensure: Resident #1's catheter bag was placed below the level of the bladder and remained free of dependent loops (a configuration of catheter tubing where the drainage tubing dips below the entry point into the catheter bag) on 11/16/23. Resident #1 had a catheter strap and was held in place to prevent pulling or tugging of indwelling catheter tubing at insert site on 11/16/23. Perineal cleaning for Resident #1 with an indwelling catheter in accordance with the resident's needs, goals for care and professional standards of practice to provide ongoing monitoring, to recognize, and report any changes in condition to Resident #1 on 11/16/23. These failures resulted in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility must store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for one (Resident #1) of six residents reviewed for the storage of drugs and biologicals. This facility failed to ensure MA A did not leave Resident #1's medications unattended on the Medication Cart located on the 400 hall, while she was in another resident's room. This deficient practice had the potential risk of affecting all residents who received medications on the 400 hall, which could cause residents to miss getting their medications or cause other residents to ingest the medications, which could result in adverse reactions in residents. Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility 02/06/26. She had a BIMS score of 13 (cognitively intact) and used a wheelchair and walker for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-12 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide medically related social services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident for one of ten residents (Resident #1) reviewed for medically related social services. The facility failed to ensure a Social Worker assisted Resident #1that was under the age of 22, in obtaining additional resources and services related permanency. This failure could place all residents at risk of not having their needs and preferences met according to permanency planning regulations for those under the age of 22.Record Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 12/31/2025, reflected she was [AGE] years old, admitted on [DATE]. The resident was diagnosed with Diffuse traumatic brain injury with loss of consciousness of unspecified duration, sequela ( a head injury that injured their brain, loss of conscience for an unknown period of time with lasting problems.), Dependence on Respirator [Ventilator]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained free of accident hazards as is possible for 2 of 4 hallways reviewed. The facility failed to ensure 2 of 4 assisted lifting devices were secured properly while being stored in 2 of 4 hallways. This failure had the potential to cause harm to the residents by creating avoidable accident hazards. The findings include: Record Review of an undated facility policy titled Hydraulic Lift reflected there were no instructions on proper storage or caster locking for assisted lifting devices when not in use. Record Review of an undated user manual for Hoyer Advance Patient Lift reflected that the proper storage method for the assisted lifting device is to be fold the mast down towards the legs and then stored in an upright position when the lift is not in use. Record Review of a document titled Inservice Training Attendance Roster for an in-service training titled All beds and hoyers to be locked, dated 1/8/25,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to protect residents' right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment for 20 of 31 residents in the secured unit reviewed for resident rights. The male side of the secured unit had a strong urine smell on 9/16, 9/17 and 9/18/2025. This failure could result in lack of residents' hygiene and could affect their dignity. Findings included:Observation on 9/16/2025 at 7:45am, the end of hallway 100 which was connected to the secured unit had a strong urine smell. Upon entering the secured unit, there was a strong urine smell that spread through the entire male's side of the secured unit. The male side had 20 male residents. Observation on 9/17/2025 at 6:45am, the male side of the secured unit had a strong urine smell. Observation on 9/18/2025 at 9am, the male side of the secured unit had a strong urine smell. In an interview on 9/18/2025 at 9:15am, CNA A, who was the CNA assigned to male side of the secured unit, stated that there were 4 or 5…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-18 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents resided and received services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for two (Resident #136 and Resident #112) of thirty-eight residents reviewed for call lights. Staff failed to ensure Resident # 136's and Resident # 112's call buttons were within reach. This failure could place residents at risk for needs not being met, decreased quality of life, self-worth and dignity.Findings included: Review of Resident #136's face sheet dated 09/18/2025 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE], readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure, Unspecified, Whether with Hypoxia or Hypercapnia (a sudden exacerbation and an underlying long-term condition affecting the lungs, where the specific nature of the blood gas issue, low oxygen or high carbon dioxide, has not been determined or documented ); Unspecified Dementia, Unspecified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident received adequate supervision for one resident (Resident #28) of thirty-eight residents reviewed for supervision and ensured the environment remained free of accident hazards.The facility failed to ensure Resident #28 was not in possession of over-the-counter isopropyl alcohol located in resident's room.These failures could place residents at risk of being in danger and could be fatal if a resident ingested isopropyl alcohol.Findings included:Record review of Resident #28's Face Sheet dated 09/18/2025 revealed a [AGE] year-old male with an admission date of 02/01/2023 with a readmission on [DATE]. Admitting diagnoses included Vascular Dementia, Unspecified, Severity without Behavioral Disturbances, Psychotic Disturbances, Mood Disturbances, and Anxiety (a type of dementia caused by reduced or blocked blood flow to the brain, often stemming from conditions like heart disease, high blood pressure, diabetes, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-14 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed ensure the resident's right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his or her personal and medical records for fourteen (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, and #14) of thirty residents reviewed for privacy and confidentiality. 1. The facility failed to ensure LVN C pulled the privacy curtain while suctioning (mechanical aspiration of pulmonary secretions to clear the airway) Resident #1 on 07/12/2025. 2. The facility failed to ensure LVN C closed the door while suctioning Resident #2 on 07/12/2025. 3. The facility failed to ensure LVN D did not leave Residents #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, and #13's medical information on top of his cart on 07/12/2025. 4. The facility failed to ensure RN E closed, locked, or minimized his laptop's monitor, thus, showing Resident #14's medical information on 07/13/2025. These failures could place the residents at risk of not having their personal privacy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for four (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #12 and Resident #15) of twenty residents reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure LVN C did not re-use a gown to provide treatment for some residents at hall 400 on 07/12/2025. 2. The facility failed to ensure LVN C changed her gown in between Resident #1 and Resident #2 who were with tracheostomy on 07/12/2025. 3. The facility failed to ensure LVN C changed her gloves and performed hand hygiene when changing Resident #2's tracheostomy dressing on 07/12/2025. 4. The facility failed to ensure LVN D wore a gown while administering Resident #12's medication via g-tube on 07/12/2025 5. The facility failed to ensure CNA F changed her gloves and performed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-14 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding for one (Resident #12) of five residents reviewed for feeding tube (a process of providing nutrition directly to the stomach). The facility failed to ensure LVN C checked Resident #12's g-tube (gastrostomy tube: a tube inserted through the abdomen that delivers nutrition directly to the stomach) placement and residual before administering the resident's medications and failed to administer the resident's medication one by one on 07/12/2025. These failures could place residents with g-tubes at risk for aspiration and drug-to-drug interaction. Findings included: Record review of Resident #12's Face Sheet, dated 07/12/2025, reflected an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was diagnosed with dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing). Record review of Resident #12's Comprehensive MDS Assessment, dated 05/15/2025, reflected the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-23 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — patternProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure personnel provide basic life support, including CPR, to a resident requiring such emergency care prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel and subject to related physician orders and the resident's advance directives for 2 of 3 (Emergency cart 1, Emergency cart 2) emergency crush carts reviewed for emergency preparedness. 1. Facility failed to have an ambu bag [is a portable, handheld device used to provide ventilation to a resident struggling to breathe or has stopped breathing] on Emergency cart 1. 2. Facility failed to check inventory daily on Emergency cart 2 from [DATE] to [DATE] and from 4/20 to [DATE]. These failures could place residents at risk for delayed emergency care. The findings included: Review of emergency crash cart 2's daily inventory check off on [DATE] at 3:30 AM, revealed no check off was completed on [DATE], [DATE] to [DATE] and from 4/20 to [DATE]. RN B completed check off on 4/1, 4/18, and [DATE].…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 29 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensurethat a resident who needs respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning, is provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, the residents' goals and preferences for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to obtain physician orders with specific non-rebreather (this is a mask that delivers high concentration oxygen with a minimum of 10 to 15 Liters/minute of Oxygen flow via a mask and has a valve that ensures air only comes in or out one way) amount on resident #1 from 11/11/24 to 11/14/24. This failure could place the resident at risk for receiving inaccurate oxygen therapy and retention of too much carbon dioxide in residents with COPD. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #1's admission record dated 04/23/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old female with an admission date of 01/16/24. Her primary diagnosis was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-23 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that licensed nurses have the specific competencies and skill sets necessary to care for residents' needs, as identified through resident assessments, and described in the plan of care for for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure RN A was trained on using a non-rebreather on Resident #1 and what parameters are required and when to discontinue use of the non-rebreather. This failure could place the resident at risk for receiving inaccurate oxygen therapy and retention of too much carbon dioxide in residents with COPD. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #1 ' s admission record dated 04/23/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old female with an admission date of 01/16/24. Her primary diagnosis was unspecified dementia (a brain disease that alters brain function and causes a cognitive decline), and her secondary diagnoses were Myxedma coma (this is a rare life threatening endocrine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is fed by enteral means receives the appropriate treatment and services to restore, if possible, oral eating skills and to prevent complications of enteral feeding including but not limited to aspiration pneumonia, diarrhea, vomiting, dehydration, metabolic abnormalities, and nasal-pharyngeal ulcers for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for enteral nutrition. The facility failed to ensure the date and time was written on Resident #1's formula and water bag . This failure could place residents at risk of malnutrition and dehydration. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission record, dated 12/12/2024, revealed a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (when body tissues do not have enough oxygen), tracheostomy status (a surgical hole made in the windpipe to help with breathing), and gastrostomy status (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-29 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to retain and use personal possessions for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for personal property. The Administrator took Resident #1's cell phone away from her because she had called 911 several times. This failure could place residents at risk of not being able to retain and use personal property. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's undated admission Record reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and expired on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included congestive heart failure, respiratory failure requiring the use of a tracheostomy, and ventilator dependence. (The resident's heart was failing, she developed breathing issues, was intubated and placed on a ventilator. The resident could not breathe without the ventilator, so a breathing tube was placed in her neck and she continued to rely on the ventilator to breathe.) Record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right to be free from verbal abuse for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for mistreatment, (Resident #1). The facility did not prevent CNA B from mistreating Resident #1. CNA B yelled at Resident #1 during the early morning of 10/31/2024 trying to force resident to go to bed causing Resident #1 to become angry. This failure could place residents at risk for staff mistreatment. Findings included: Record review of Provider Investigation Report dated 11/06/2024 revealed: On the morning of 10/31/2024 at 12:35 AM, Resident #1 was refusing to go to bed. Resident #1's family had a video camera in resident's room and witnessed a confrontation between resident and CNA B. CNA B was trying to force resident to go to bed by grabbing resident's arm and yelling at resident. Resident was resisting going to bed. LVN A was summoned by CNA B to assisting with resident to get her to go to bed. Resident #1 was placed in bed and covered with blanket. Record review of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' environment remained as free of accident hazards as is possible for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for environmental hazards. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's bedframe and mattress were maintained to prevent accidents. This failure could place residents at risk of accidents and injury. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's admission record dated, 11/19/2024, reflected a [AGE] year-old-male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of legal blindness. Record review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 10/25/2024, reflected a BIMS score of 15, indicating intact cognition. Record review of Resident #2's Care Plan revised on 11/15/2024 revealed Resident #2 required supervision with bed mobility. Observation and interview on 11/19/2024 at 9:48 AM, in Resident #2's room, revealed Resident #2 sitting up on the side of his bed. The bed appeared lopsided; with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility was free of pests for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for effective pest control. 1. The facility failed to effectively treat for flies. 2. The facility failed to effectively treat for roaches. These failures could place all residents at risk for the potential of a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Interview on 11/19/2024 at 9:48 AM, Resident #3 stated he had seen roaches and killed one yesterday on his dresser during the 10-6 night shift. Observation on 11/19/2024 at 11:46 AM in Resident #4's room revealed resident was not in room. Resident #4's mattress had no sheets, and a yellowish-brown stain was in the center of the mattresss. Four live flies were observed on the mattress near the stain. Interview on 11/19/2024 at 11:50 AM, Resident #5 stated a roach had crawled on her, and on top of her bed. She stated that happened about 2 Sundays ago (November 3rd) and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents requiring respiratory care were provided care, consistent with professional standards of practices for 2 of 7 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Residents #5 and #16). 1. RN K staff failed to ensure Resident #5's and Resident #16's nasal cannula was bagged for sanitation when not in use per the facility's policy on 10/09/24. 2. RN K failed to ensure Resident #5's oxygen concentrator and filter were free of food crumbs, debris (dust gray fuzzy participles) and spilled brown liquid on 10/09/24. 3. RN K failed to ensure Resident #16's nasal cannula was bagged for sanitation when not in use per the facility's policy on 10/09/24. 4. LVN J failed to ensure Resident #16's oxygen concentrator and filter were free of food crumbs, debris (dust gray fuzzy participles) spilled brown liquid on 10/09/24 and 10/15/24. These failures could place residents who require respiratory care at risk for respiratory infections,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had a right to personal privacy for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for personal privacy. LVN P failed to ensure Resident #1's dignity and privacy was provided when he failed to use the privacy curtain as she laid naked and exposed. This failure placed the residents at risk of not having their privacy respected. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 10/09/24 reflected a female age [AGE] year-old that was admitted on [DATE] with the current DX: Dementia with other behavioral disturbances (disease causing cognitive decline), Cognitive communication deficit (difficulty with language), Basal Cell Carcinoma of skin of other part of trunk (a type of skin cancer that causes bumps, lumps or lesions). Record review of Resident #1's admission MDS dated , 09/10/24, revealed a BIMS score of 02, indicating the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #1's required maximal assistance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide residents in need of ADL care the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene for 1 of 30 residents (Resident #33) reviewed for showers. The facility failed to ensure Resident #33 received showers/baths on scheduled days. This failure could affect residents by putting them at risk for diminished quality of life, hygiene, and self-esteem. Findings include: Record review of Resident #33's face sheet dated 8-22-2024 revealed a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of Muscular Dystrophy (a hereditary condition marked by progressive weakening and wasting of the muscles) with secondary diagnoses of quadriplegia (a severe medical condition that causes partial or total loss of function in all four limbs and the torso), heart failure, and contracture of right and left ankles. Record review of Resident #33's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS Score of 14 indicating being…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-22 · tag F0711 — patternEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, medical records were maintained on each resident that were complete, accurately documented, readily accessible, and systematically organized for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #106) reviewed for resident records. Facility failed to ensure physician orders were written for ventilator setting for Resident #106 on admission [DATE] to 08-22-2024. This failure could place residents at risk for incorrect treatment decisions, evaluation, and treatment plans compromising patient safety due to insufficient information records. Findings included: Review of Resident #106 admission record dated 08-22-2024 revealed a [AGE] year-old female that was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure, sepsis (this is a systemic infection), pneumonia, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (also known as ALS, a nervous system disease that affects nerve cells…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infections for 4 (Residents #18, #59, #72, and Resident #437) of 12 residents reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure LVN M disinfected blood sugar monitoring device between use on Resident #18, #59, and Resident #437 and failed to ensure LVN M performed hand hygiene after removing gloves and touching contaminated blood sugar monitoring device between use on Resident #18, #59 and Resident 437. The facility failed to ensure RN G put on PPE for EBP and perform hand hygiene when administering G-tube medication to Resident #72. These failures could place residents at risk for the spread of disease and infections. Findings included: 1. Resident #18 Review of Resident #18's face sheet on 08-21-2024, revealed a [AGE] year-old…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-22 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program for 3 of 30 residents (Residents #66, 42, and #103) reviewed for effective pest control. The facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to ensure the facility was free of flies for Resident #66, #42, and #103 in the facilities only dining room. This failure could place the residents at risk for an unsanitary environment. Findings included: Record review of Resident #66's face sheet dated revealed a [AGE] year-old male who had an original admission date of 3-9-2020 and a re-admission date of 2-9-2024. Resident #66's primary diagnosis was a cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting the left dominant side and secondary diagnoses of cognitive communication deficit, ulcer of the right heel and midfoot, lack of coordination, and contracture of the right knee. Record review of Resident #66's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated a BIMS score of 13 revealing being cognitively…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents received services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of each resident's needs for 2 of 30 (Residents #17 and #114) reviewed for accommodation in needs. The facility failed to ensure Resident #17 and #114's call lights were within reach of the resident. This failure could have affected residents who needed assistance and could have resulted in their needs not being met. Findings included: Record Review of Resident #17's face sheet dated 8-21-2024, revealed a [AGE] year-old female who initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of Covid-19 and Schizoaffective disorder (Bipolar type), and secondary diagnoses dementia, fracture of T11-T12 vertebra, difficulty walking, unsteadiness on feet, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and lack of coordination. Record review of Resident #17's MDS dated [DATE] indicated a BIMS score of 9 which revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure the residents had the right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his or her personal space for one of five residents (Resident #18) reviewed for privacy. The facility failed to ensure that the roommates of residents with AEM had signed consents in the active section of their EHR as evidenced by record review for Resident #18. This failure could place residents at risk of having medical or personal information or conversations recorded or exposed to others, and cause residents to feel a loss of privacy, dignity, and decreased self-worth and self-esteem. Findings included: Observation on 8-20-2024, at 9:54AM of the room shared by Residents #18 and #59 revealed an AEM camera placed on a dresser top aimed to capture motion of most of the room and Resident #59's bed area. Record Review of Resident #18's admission Record revealed a [AGE] year-old, divorced, Hispanic male whose primary language was Spanish who had initially…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who received nutrition by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services according to professional standards of maintenance for one (Resident #487) of twelve resident reviewed for enteral feeding. The facility failed to ensure Resident #487's G-tube water and enteral administration set (tubing attached to formula and water bottles for continuous G-tube feeding) were changed when his formula was changed on 08-19-2024 and on 08-21-2024 and failed to ensure the water was dated when it was changed. This failure could place residents at risk of infection due to not following appropriate procedures. Findings included: Review of Resident #487's face sheet dated 08-21-2024 revealed a [AGE] year-old male that was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (low oxygen), bacterial infection, anemia, cerebral palsy (a congenital disorder of movement, muscle…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure parenteral fluids were administered consistent with professional standards of practice for one (Resident #487) of 2 residents reviewed for intravenous fluids. The facility failed to ensure Resident #487 received PICC line orders to manage, access, flush, and perform dressing changes since admission [DATE]. A Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter -PICC line is a soft, flexible catheter inserted into a central vein used for prolonged antibiotic therapy, giving fluids, and or getting clinical nutrients. This failure could place residents at risk for infection. Review of Resident #487's face sheet dated 08-21-2024 revealed a [AGE] year-old male that was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included hypotension (low blood pressure), enlarged prostate (this is a condition when the prostate gland becomes larger than normal making it hard to urinate or empty the bladder), pneumonia, nutritional problem or potential…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for two of three medication carts and one of one respiratory treatment carts reviewed for medication storage The facility failed to ensure two (Medication Cart#1 and Medication Cart#2) facility medication cart and one (RTC) respiratory treatment cart were locked when unattended on 08/14/24. This failure could place residents at risk of having access to unauthorized medications and/or lead to possible harm or drug diversions. Findings included: An observation on 08/14/24 at 5:00 AM revealed the medication cart#1 was unlocked at the nursing station with no staff in view of the medication cart. Observation of medication cart#1 revealed the medication cart was facing outward toward the hallway. Observation of the lock mechanism was popped out and revealed a red indicater. Observation revealed LVN A was at the end of hallway 400. An observation on 08/14/24 at 5:06…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-29 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure before a facility transfers or dischargers a resident the facility must send a copy of the notice of transfer or discharge and the reasons for the transfer or discharge in writing to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for one (Resident #1) of eight residents reviewed for transfer and discharge. The facility failed to send a transfer or discharge notice in writing to the facility's Ombudsman as soon as practicable when Resident #1 was discharged to hospital on [DATE]. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk of being discharged and not having access to available advocacy services, discharge/transfer options, and the appeal processes. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission record dated 07/26/24 revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female who was original admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Her diagnosed included: chronic respiratory failure (condition that affects your…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-29 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure, before a resident was transferred to a hospital or the resident went on therapeutic leave, provided written information to the resident or the resident representative that specified the duration of the bed-hold policy, if any, during which the resident was permitted to return and resume residence in the nursing facility for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for transfers: The facility failed to provide Resident #1 with a written bed-hold policy when the resident was transferred out to the hospital. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving notice of the facility's bed hold policy before being transferred; at risk for of being improperly discharged and placed in unsafe conditions. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission record, dated 07/26/24 revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female who was original admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Her diagnosed included: chronic respiratory…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning, was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care for 4 of 5 resident's (Resident #1, Resident #3, Resident #5, and Resident #7) reviewed for respiratory care. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's oxygen tubing was dated, and his CPAP mask and portable nasal cannula on his wheelchair were bagged and dated when not in use. 2. Resident #3, #5, and #7's oxygen tubes were not labeled, stored, and changed for resident. These failures affected resident's and placed them at risk of not receiving the needed services for respiratory care. Findings include: Resident #1 Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated on 05/02/24, revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Acute Respiratory Failure (lungs cannot Exchange Oxygen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to review and revise the person-centered comprehensive care plan to reflect the resident's current status, for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's care plan reflected behaviors of not using the call light when he needed assistance, removing his CPAP mask, and throwing both to the floor when agitated. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not receiving appropriate care and interventions to meet their current needs. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated on 05/02/24, revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Acute Respiratory Failure (lungs cannot Exchange Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide) with Hypoxia (low oxygen), Emphysema/COPD (air flow blockage and breathing), Atrial Fibrillation (irregular or rapid heart rhythm), Dementia (cognitive decline). Record review of Resident #1's admission MDS,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-03 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to be adequately equipped to allow for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for resident call system, in that. Resident #1s call lights was on the floor and not within reach. This could place the residents at risk of not receiving the care and services to maintain their highest level of well-being. Findings included: Resident #1 Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated on 05/02/24, revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Acute Respiratory Failure (lungs cannot Exchange Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide) with Hypoxia (low oxygen), Emphysema/COPD (air flow blockage and breathing), Atrial Fibrillation (irregular or rapid heart rhythm), Dementia (cognitive decline). Record review of Resident #1's admission MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 02,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving neglect, which included injuries of unknown source, were reported immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that caused the allegation did not involve abuse and did not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials, which included the State Survey Agency, in accordance with State law through established procedures for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse and neglect. 1. Student Nurse Aide A, who worked the 2:00 PM-10:00 PM shift, failed to report to the charge nurse when she found Resident #1 on the floor on 04/09/24 at 9:46 PM resulting in the resident not receiving immediate treatment and care until 4:40 AM on 04/10/24, when 10:00 PM-6:00 AM staff, discovered significant bruising and injury to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive care plan, and the residents' choices for 2 of 5 residents (Residents #1 and #3) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to provide wound care services for Resident #1 as ordered on 11/03/23, 11/06/23, 11/08/23, 11/11/23 (night), 11/12/23 (night), and 11/13/23 (evening and night). The facility failed to provide wound care services for Resident #3 as ordered on 11/06/23 and 11/08/23. This failure could place residents at risk of infection and/or deterioration of their wounds. Findings include: Resident #1: Record review of Resident #1's electronic Facesheet, dated 11/14/23, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1's diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure, dependence on ventilator (a machine that helps you breathe or breathes for you), tracheostomy (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all residents with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, and prevent infection for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for wound care. The facility failed to provide wound care services for Resident #2 as ordered on 11/03/23, 11/06/23, and 11/08/23. This failure could place residents at risk of infection and/or deterioration of their pressure ulcers. Resident #2: Record review of Resident #2's electronic Facesheet, dated 11/14/23, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #2's diagnoses included acute respiratory failure, dependence on ventilator (a machine that helps you breathe or breathes for you), and quadriplegia (a form of paralysis that affects all four limbs, plus the torso). Record review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 10/16/23, reflected Resident #2's BIMS was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0710 — isolatedObtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure orders were provided for the resident's immediate care and needs for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #1) reviewed. LVN B failed to ensure a physician, physician assistant, nurse practitioner, or clinical nurse specialist provided orders for Mupirocin cream applied topically to Resident #1. This failure had the potential to place Resident #1 at risk of an adverse drug reaction. Findings included: A record review on 11/16/23 at 9:13 AM of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a 74 y.o. male initially admitted to SNF on 03/09/23 and the most recent reentry into the SNF was 07/19/23. Resident #1 had a primary medical condition of Debility, Cardiorespiratory Conditions with invasive mechanical ventilation (have a tube in the airway connected to a ventilator). Resident #1's diagnoses information included chronic respiratory failure; Neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (urinary condition when lack of bladder control is due…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-13 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident resided and received services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for 7 (Resident #8, Resident #12, Resident #3, Resident #44, Resident #81, Resident #24, and Resident #62) of 114 residents reviewed for call lights. The facility failed to ensure Resident #8, Resident #12, Resident #3, Resident #44, Resident #81, Resident #24, and Resident #62's call buttons were within reach. This failure could place residents at risk for decreased quality of life, self-worth, and dignity. Findings included: Review of Resident #8's face sheet dated 07/13/23 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease; Major Depressive Disorder; Unspecified Lack of Coordination; and Other Abnormalities of Gait. Review of Resident #8's MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #8 required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received necessary services to maintain grooming, and personal hygiene for 1 of 23 residents (Resident #97) reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to provide Resident # 97 with showers/bed baths on a consistent basis. This failure could place residents at risk for poor personal hygiene and a decline in their quality of life and health status. Findings included: Record review of Resident #97's electronic face sheet, dated 07/13/23, revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #97 had diagnoses which included anoxic brain damage (no blood flow to brain tissue), chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (oxygen is not available in sufficient amounts), tracheostomy status (has an opening through neck into the trachea to allow air to fill the lungs), gastrostomy status (has an opening into the stomach for feeding through a tube), and dependence on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$23,621 in federal fines across 3 penalties.
- $9,706 — penalty dated 2024-06-28
- $6,271 — penalty dated 2024-04-14
- $7,644 — penalty dated 2023-11-16
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CREATIVE SOLUTIONS IN HEALTHCARE — 149 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 1 of 5 | 3.2 | -2.2 vs chain |
The other 148 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 148; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| BOWERS, SEAN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 07/01/2024 |
| CISNEROS, ALFRED | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 02/18/2008 |
| COBB, TRAVIS | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 10/05/2022 |
| COOPER, STEPHEN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 11/11/2022 |
| HARDIN, SHERRIE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 09/04/2024 |
| KERZEE, RICHARD | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 09/24/2007 |
| KORENEK, PATRICIA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 05/05/2018 |
| SOECHTING, PAUL | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 11/22/2024 |
| STRACK, JOE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 02/11/2022 |
| HUGGINS, LINDA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 04/01/2022 |
| WILLIG, ZACHARY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 04/01/2022 |
| THOMPSON, JOHNNY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/01/2024 |
| MARINE CREEK I ENTERPRISES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/17/2025 |
| BLAKE, GARY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2022 |
| BLAKE, MALISA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 09/01/2022 |
| OLATUNJI, ADEBOLA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2022 |
| WRIGHT, BRENDA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/17/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675779. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.