No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Countryview Nursing & Rehabilitation

1900 N Frances St, Terrell, TX 75160 · Government - Hospital district · 115 certified beds · (972) 524-2503 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseResident-funds citation (F0567)3 immediate-jeopardy citations2 immediate-jeopardy citations CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$79,953 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
  • inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (51) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $79,953 in federal fines (most recent 2025-08-15)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (94%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Urgent care / clinic
(972) 551-0217 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
642 N Rockwall Ave · (972) 563-6466 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1742 N Frances St · (972) 563-1198 · Call to confirm hours
Park
451 Northgate Dr · (972) 551-6600 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1717 N Frances St · (972) 563-5635

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased18.8%15.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.0%3.0%5.4%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.6%0.3%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.6%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%2.4%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.7%3.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened11.2%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication13.8%18.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.6%3.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control21.9%13.4%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.8%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.27U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 40% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.34
RN hours/ resident / day
1.13
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.67
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.13
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.32
RN hoursweekends
94.4%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 115 beds and averages 52.1 residents a day — about 45% occupied, or roughly 63 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.13 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.67 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.73 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.30 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.35 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 94% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-15)
21
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-30)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

51 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 1 (Resident #7) of 6 Residents reviewed for abuse.The facility failed to protect Resident #7 from verbal abuse when Resident #16 made mocking statements and gestures regarding Resident #7's personal hygiene, the Administrator, LVN B, DON and Social Worker were aware of the verbal abuse. The verbal abuse led to Resident #7 being fearful, avoiding Resident #16 and Resident #7's withdrawal from former social patterns in refusing to go to the dining room and activities. An IJ was identified on 08/14/25. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 10:13AM. While the IJ was removed on 08/15/25, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of potential for more than minimal harm because the facility was continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their Plan of RemovalThis failure could result in residents becoming fearful, refusing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-04-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents the right to be free from abuse and/or neglect for 1 (Resident #1) of 7 residents reviewed for abuse and/or neglect. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was free from physical abuse. CNA A grabbed Resident #1's arm and twisted it and then CNA A put her hands on Resident #1's neck and choked her. The incident occurred on 03/03/25. An IJ was identified on 4/22/25. The IJ began on 03/03/25 and removed on 03/03/25. The facility took action to remove the IJ before the survey began. While the IJ was removed on 03/03/25, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of pattern and a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm because all staff had not been trained on behavior management procedures, abuse, and trauma informed care plans. These failures could place residents at risk of physical or emotional harm. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 04/21/25,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained free of accident hazards as possible, and each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent elopement for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accident hazards and supervision. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 1 had adequate interventions to prevent elopement on 04/08/24 after he had verbalized and or attempted to leave the facility on 03/15/24, 03/17/24, 03/18/24, and 03/31/24. 2. The facility failed to prevent Resident #1 from eloping from the facility on 04/08/24. Resident #1 wheeled himself approximately 0.3 miles from the facility. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 07/09/24 at 5:51 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 07/10/24, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm, due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-11-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures to ensure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 3 Residents reviewed for pharmaceutical services. (Resident #1) The facility failed to follow physician order to give Resident #1 Invega Sustenna prefilled syringe 234 MG/1.5ML injection once a month. Resident #1 missed Invega in October and began hearing voices telling him to harm himself and Resident #1 had to be admitted to a psychiatric facility. The facility failed to ensure their Medication Administration Policy was followed where a resident's medication will be administered in an accurate, safe, timely and sanitary manner. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's script for Invega Sustenna prefilled syringe 234 MG/1.5ML injection medication were acquired from pharmacy. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) began on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2023-11-14 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures to ensure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 3 Residents reviewed for pharmaceutical services. (Resident #1) The facility failed to follow physician order to give Resident #1 Invega Sustenna prefilled syringe 234 MG/1.5ML injection once a month. Resident #1 missed Invega in October and began hearing voices telling him to harm himself and Resident #1 had to be admitted to a psychiatric facility. The facility failed to ensure their Medication Administration Policy was followed where a resident's medication will be administered in an accurate, safe, timely and sanitary manner. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's script for Invega Sustenna prefilled syringe 234 MG/1.5ML injection medication were acquired from pharmacy. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) began on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 resident reviewed for accidents. (Resident #2) The facility failed to provide adequate supervision during breakfast meal which resulted in CNA C spilling hot coffee on Resident #2 abdomen and Resident #2 sustained blisters from the coffee. This failure could result in residents who drank coffee at risk of having burn accidents, pain, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet, printed on 11/3/23, indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to facility on 11/03/22 with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non dominant side (paralysis of partial or total body function on one side of the body, whereas hemiparesis is characterized by one?sided weakness, but without complete paralysis due to having a stroke), cerebral infarction due to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-08-15 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to notify residents or their representatives on how to file a grievance or complaint in an anonymous manner for The facility failed to notify residents or their representatives either individually or through prominent postings throughout the facility on how to file a grievance or complaint in an anonymous manner for 1 of 1 facilities reviewed. This failure could place residents at risk of not filing a grievance without the fear of discrimination, reprisal, retribution, and their right to anonymously file their grievance. Findings included:Interview on 08/12/2025 at 2:00PM with six residents during the confidential Resident Council revealed the residents were unaware where grievance forms were located. The residents stated that they did not know how to anonymously file a grievance.Observation of the common areas throughout the facility on 08/12/25 at 2:45PM revealed no grievance forms or a container to place the grievances. Interview on 08/13/25 at 6:20PM, the Activities Director said if anyone wanted to fill…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an environment as free of accident hazards as is possible for 3 of 3 areas (1 shower room, and 1 wooden cabinet inside of the shower room and exterior/interior front door), reviewed for accidents and hazards. 1. The facility failed to ensure that the exterior door to the Shower Room in the facility's Secured Unit was locked and secured.2. The facility failed to ensure that the Master lock on the wooden cabinet inside the Shower Room in the facility's Secured Unit was locked and secured.3. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #7 was supervised and did not have access to the Nurses Station and access the red button to open the front door. These failures could place residents at risk of accidents, injury, elopement, and consuming hazardous products. Findings Include:Record review of Resident #7's admission face sheet dated 08/13/25 reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to label drugs and biologicals used in the facility in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable for one medication cart (600 hall) of the facility's two medication carts reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to ensure that opened insulin pens,1) Lantus 100 unit/ml and 2) Insulin pro 100units/ml were properly labeled and dated before storing in the 600-hall medication cart. This failure could place resident at risk by diminishing the effectiveness, and therapeutic benefits of the medications and/or result in medication error by giving the wrong resident the wrong insulin.The findings included:Observation on [DATE] at 11:03 AM with LVN B on the 600-hallway's medication cart revealed opened insulin pens: 1. Lantus 100 unit/ml and 2. Insulin pro 100 units/ml that had no patients' labels, and no dates…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed.The facility failed to ensure that 1 of 1 dented can was removed from the rack in the dry pantry areaThe facility failed to ensure that Dietary X properly used hair restraints during food preparation. This failure could place residents at risk for food exposed to adulteration or potential contaminants.Findings Included:Observation and interview on 08/12/25 at 9:15 AM, the Dietary Manager stated she had been employed at the facility for four years. The initial tour of the kitchen revealed that in the dry storage area 1 of 1 dented can on the rack with the other canned items, instead of in the area labeled as Dented Cans Only, do not use. Dietary Manager indicated the dented cans were used first. The Dietary Manager repeated a second time what was said about the use of the dented cans. During interview with the Dietary Manager on 08/15/2025 at 2:51pm in the dining room she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of one (Resident #2) of four residents reviewed for medication administration.The facility failed to ensure LVN A administered each medication separately via Resident #2's g-tube per physician's orderThis failure could place residents at risk for potential significant medication interactions such as medication-medication or medication-food interactions.Findings included:Record review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 07/19/25, reflected the Resident was a [AGE] year-old male, had a BIMs score of 8 indicating he was moderately cognitively impaired. The Resident had diagnoses which included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing foods and liquids), Cerebrovascular accident (a disruption of blood flow to the brain, leading to brain cell damage).Record review of Resident #2's Comprehensive Care Plan, revised…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 (Resident #2) of 6 residents reviewed for infection control. 1.LVN L failed to don (to put on) PPE prior to performing the high contact resident care activity on a resident who was on enhanced barrier precaution.This failure could place residents at risk for healthcare associated cross contamination and infections.Findings included:Record review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 07/19/25, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male, had a BIMs score of 8 indicating he was moderately cognitively impaired. The resident had diagnoses which included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing foods and liquids), Cerebrovascular accident (a disruption of blood flow to the brain, leading to brain cell…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-07-30 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide food that was palatable, attractive and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 1 of 3 meals reviewed for palatability and temperature. The facility failed to provide food that was palatable and appetizing temperature for 1 of 3 meals observed on 7/29/24 (lunch) meal. These failures could place residents at risk of decreased food intake, hunger, and unwanted weight loss. The findings included: During an interview on 7/28/24 at 10:36 a.m., Resident #29 stated the food was not good at all, and no alternatives were offered. Resident #29 stated staff use to walk around and ask the residents for alternatives but did not walk around and ask the residents anymore. During an interview on 7/28/24 at 10:43 a.m., Resident #26 stated the dietary staff cooked too much chili powder and beans and her roll was burnt. During an interview on 7/28/24 at 12:44 p.m., Resident #15 stated her roll was burnt, the meat was hard, and the corn was cold. During an interview on 7/28/24 at 1:00p.m., Resident #27 stated the roll…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-07-30 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — widespread
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient staff to effectively conduct food and nutrition services for the facility's main dining room. The facility failed to serve meals, at the specific times posted, in the main dining room. This failure placed residents at risk of increased hunger, thirst, frustration, and decreased feelings of self-worth. Findings included: Record review of the facility's posted meal service reflected the breakfast mealtime was 7:00 AM; the lunch mealtime was 12:00 PM; and the dinner mealtime was 5:00 PM. During an observation in the kitchen on 7/28/24 at 9:30 a.m., revealed only one Dietary Aide in the dining room; no other dietary staff were in the kitchen. During an observation and interview on 7/28/24 at 9:31 a.m., [NAME] A stated the Dietary Manager had gone on break. [NAME] A stated she called the Dietary Manager, and the Dietary Manager's spouse stated the Dietary Manager had gone to the grocery store. [NAME] A stated the Dietary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in (1 of 1) kitchen reviewed for dietary services, in that: 1) The facility failed to label and date all food items. 2) Dietary staff failed to dispose of expired foods items. 3) Dietary staff failed to effectively reseal, label and date frozen food items. 4) Dietary staff failed to store dented cans on a separate shelf. 5) Dietary staff failed to remove scoop from sugar container. 6) Dietary staff failed to clean the deep fryer. These failures could place residents at risk for food contamination and foodborne illness. The findings included: During observations with [NAME] A on 07/28/24 beginning at 9:59 am, the following observations were made in the kitchen freezer (1 of 2): -(1) unopened 2 pound bag of yellow squash had no receive date. -(1) sealed gallon container of vanilla ice cream had no open date. -(1) sealed gallon size…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-30 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who require dialysis services receive such services consistent with professional standards of practice for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for dialysis services. (Residents #23 and Resident #24) The facility failed to keep ongoing communication with the dialysis facility for Resident #23 and Resident #24. This failure could place residents who received dialysis at risk for complications and not receiving proper care and treatment to meet their needs. The findings included: 1)Record review of Resident #23's face sheet, dated 07/30/2024, indicated Resident #23 was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of end stage renal disease (occurs when chronic kidney disease - the gradual loss of kidney function - reaches an advanced state), type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy (high blood sugar that has caused nerve damage), and encephalopathy (a disease that impacts the functioning of the brain).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 35 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 5 of 18 residents( Resident #192, Resident #30, Resident #34, Resident #12, and Resident #23) and 7 of 8 staff (LVN A, LVN C, CNA C, CNA L, LVN K, CNA B, and CNA O) reviewed for infection control practices and transmission-based precautions. 1. LVN A failed to ensure Resident #192 had the proper cap in place to prevent infection in PICC line. 2. LVN A failed to wash his hands while passing medications to Resident #30 and Resident #34. 3.The facility failed to ensure the EBP (enhanced barrier precautions) were in place for Resident #192 on 07/28/24. 4.LVN C failed to properly store urine obtained for urinalysis. 5.CNA L failed to perform hand hygiene during Resident #12's continent care. 6.CNA L failed to perform catheter care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-30 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or the residents' representatives the right to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care for 1 of 18 residents (Residents #19) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to invite and include the input of the resident (Resident #19) and/or resident's representatives as members of the interdisciplinary team in the Care Plan Conference meetings on 4/19/24 and 7/19/24. These failures could place residents at risk of not having needs met by depriving them the opportunity to participate in the decision making regarding their care. Findings included: Record review of Resident #19's face sheet dated 07/30/24 indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of dementia (disease characterized by general decline in cognitive ability to perform everyday activities), cerebrovascular disease (disease that affects the blood vessels in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-30 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed protect and promote the rights of the residents for 1 of 11 residents (Resident #27) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed ensure LVN N provided privacy when she provided wound care to Resident #27 on 07/28/2024. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for loss of dignity. Findings included: Record review of Resident #27's face sheet dated 07/30/24, indicated a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung disease causing restricted airflow and breathing problems), type 2 diabetes mellitus (long term condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar and using for energy), malignant neoplasm of lung (lung cancer) and weakness. Record review of Resident #27's order summary report dated 07/20/2024, indicated Resident #27 had an order dated 01/24/2024 to cleanse wound to lower back with normal saline, pat dry, apply…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-30 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement their written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident's property of 1 of 1 resident reviewed for abuse, neglect, and exploitation. (Resident #17) The facility did not implement their policy to report to HHSC when Resident #17 sustained a severe coffee burn on 8/16/23. This failure could place the residents at risk for further potential abuse, neglect, and injuries of unknown origin. Findings included: Record review of an Abuse/Neglect policy dated 2003 and revised on 5/09/2017 indicated the resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation as defined in this subpart. This includes but is not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion and any physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms. Residents should not be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to the State Survey Agency for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #17) reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility failed to report to the State Survey Agency on 8/16/2023 immediately but no later than 2 hours after becoming aware Resident #17 sustained a severe coffee burn to his right thigh. This failure could place residents at risk of further potential abuse or neglect. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 7/30/2024 indicated Resident #17 was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses heart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-30 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities based on the comprehensive assessment to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident for 7 of 12 residents (Resident #24, Resident #27, and 5 confidential residents) reviewed for activities. The facility failed to ensure quarterly activity assessments were completed for Resident #24, Resident #27, and 5 confidential residents to provide activities to meet their interests. This failure could place residents at risk for not having activities to meet their interests or needs and a decline in their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings included: 1) Record review of a face sheet dated 7/30/2024 reflected Resident #24 was a 63 -year-old male who admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of chronic kidney disease, dependence on renal dialysis, and heart failure. Record review of the Quarterly MDS assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible and each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 18 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for accidents hazards and supervision. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 did not keep cigarettes in her purse. The CNA D failed to ensure Resident #1 smoked only in the designated areas of the facility. These failures could place residents at risk for injury. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 07/30/24 indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses multiple sclerosis(autoimmune disease in which the immune system eats away at the protective covering of the nerves and causes disruption of communication), major depressive disorder, and dementia. Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-30 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who were incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #12) for incontinent care, or catheter care. CNA L failed to perform hand hygiene during Resident #12's continent care. CNA L failed to perform catheter care when Resident #12 received incontinent care. This failure placed residents who required assistance with incontinent care at risk for urinary tract infections, skin breakdown, and hospitalization. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 7/30/2024 indicated Resident #12 was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of rheumatoid arthritis end-stage (a chronic inflammatory disorder that can affect more than just your joints), fractured right femur (upper leg bone), and multiple pressure ulcers. Record review of the consolidated physician's orders dated July…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-30 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered sufficient fluid intake to maintain proper hydration and health for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #24) reviewed for fluid restriction. The facility failed to ensure Resident #24's 1 liter fluid restriction was monitored. This failure could place residents at risk for dehydration. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 7/30/2024 reflected Resident #24 was a 63 -year-old male who admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of chronic kidney disease, dependence on renal dialysis, and heart failure. Record review of a Dehydration Risk Screener dated 7/14/2021 indicated Resident #24 was a dehydration risk. The screen indicated Resident #24 was on diuretic therapy, received medications, had a terminal illness, was incontinent and required assistance with ADLs. Record review of the comprehensive care plan dated 7/27/2021 and revised on 1/05/2023 indicated Resident #24 had a potential…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory care was provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #8) reviewed for respiratory care and services. The facility failed to properly store Resident #8's nebulizer (a drug delivery device used to administer medication in the form of a mist inhaled into the lungs) mask while not in use. This failure could place residents who require respiratory care at risk for respiratory infections and exacerbation of respiratory distress. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #8's order summary report, dated 07/30/2024, indicated Resident #8 was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of lung diseases that blocks air flow and causes difficulty breathing), diabetes mellitus (a group of diseases that result in too much sugar in the blood), essential hypertension (high blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-30 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that licensed nurses were able to demonstrate the specific competencies and skill sets necessary to care for resident's needs for 1 resident's needs (Resident #192). Three Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVN A, LVN C, and LVN H) provided Intravenous (IV) therapy to Resident #192 during the month July 2024, without certification of training for Intravenous therapy. This deficient practice could place residents requiring Intravenous therapy at risk from adverse effect from improper Intravenous (IV) therapy techniques. Findings included: Record review of Resident #192's face sheet dated 07/30/24 indicated she was an [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of acute and chronic respiratory failure, diabetes mellitus type 2, Hypertension (high blood pressure), peripheral vascular disease (circulation condition in which causes decreased blood flow to the limbs), and bacteremia(blood stream infection). Record review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, and dispensing of routine drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pharmacy services. (Resident #17) The facility failed to ensure Resident #17's methocarbamol (treatment of muscle spasms/pain) 500 milligrams one tablet 3 times daily was available for administration for 2 of the 3 doses due on 7/29/2024. This failure could place residents at risk for unrelieved or increased pain from muscle spasms. Findings included Record review of a face sheet dated 7/30/2024 indicated Resident #17 was [AGE] year-old male who admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnosis diagnoses of heart failure, quadriplegia (paralysis of all four limbs), and other muscle spasms. Record review of the Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #17 understood and was understood by others. The MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-30 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the meals served met the nutritional needs of residents for 1 of 3 meal (the lunch meal) reviewed for nutritional adequacy, as evidenced by: The facility failed to follow the menu for the noon time (lunch) meal served on 7/28/24. This failure could affect all residents in the facility by placing them at risk of not receiving adequate nutritive food value needed to promote/maintain health. Findings included: Record Review of the facility week 1 menu received on 7/28/24, indicated the lunch meal items included chicken fried chicken with cream gravy, mash potatoes, Mexicali corn, honey kissed roll, banana pudding with wafers and iced tea. During an observation on 7/28/24 at 12:31 p.m., revealed the residents were served chicken fried steak instead of chicken fried chicken, cream corn instead of Mexicali corn and cantaloupe instead of banana pudding with wafers for the lunch meal on 7/29/24. During an interview on 7/29/24 at 8:47 a.m., the Dietician stated she had been the full time Dietician for the past 4…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-30 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident received and the facility provided drinks, including water and other liquids consistent with resident needs and preferences for one of thirteen residents reviewed for hydration. (Resident #17). The facility failed to ensure Resident #17 was served cranberry juice with all meals and not tea. This failure could lead to dehydration and urinary tract infections. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 7/30/2024 indicated Resident #17 was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnosis heart failure, quadriplegia (paralysis of all four limbs), and other muscle spasms, contractures of the left and right hands (a condition where the one or more fingers bend toward the palm of the hand), lack of coordination, muscle weakness, muscle wasting and atrophy. Record review of the Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #17 understood and was understood by others. The MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-30 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received and consumed foods with the appropriate nutritive content as prescribed by the physician for 2 of 2 resident (Resident #'s 31 and 16) reviewed for large protein portions for 2 of 2 meals observed. The facility failed to ensure Resident #31 received a large meat portion, per physician's orders, on his lunch tray on 7/28/2024. The facility failed to ensure Resident #16 received a large meat portion, per physician's orders, on his breakfast tray on 7/30/2024. This failure could place residents who require large servings of meat at risk of not receiving their daily protein requirements and weight loss. Findings included : 1)Record review of a face sheet dated 7/30/2024 indicated Resident #31 was an [AGE] year-old male who admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of dementia (memory loss), heart failure, and high blood pressure. Record review of the Annual MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-30 · tag F0840 — isolated
    Employ or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to arrange an appointment with an outside resource for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #27) reviewed for the use of outside resources. The facility failed to ensure Resident #27's appointments with a dermatologist (specialty for skin disease, function) was scheduled after the order dated 11/25/2023 was received by the facility. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving needed medical care. Findings included: Record review of Resident 27's face sheet dated 07/30/24, indicated a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung disease causing restricted airflow and breathing problems), type 2 diabetes mellitus (long term condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar and using for energy), malignant neoplasm of lung (lung cancer) and weakness. Record review of Resident #27's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident #27 was able…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-30 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to collaborate with hospice representatives and coordinate the hospice care planning process for each resident receiving hospice services, to ensure quality of care for the resident, ensuring communication with the hospice medical director, the resident's attending physician, and others participating in the provision of care for 2 of 2 residents (Residents #8 and #12) reviewed for hospice services. The facility failed to obtain Resident #8 and #12's most recent hospice plan of care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #8 and #12's hospice plans of care accurately reflected their medication regimen. This deficient practice could place Residents who receive hospice services at-risk of receiving inadequate end-of-life care due to a lack of documentation, coordination of care and communication of resident needs. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #8's face sheet, dated 07/30/2024, indicated Resident #8 was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were secured on 3 of 4 medication carts reviewed for pharmacy services. (500 Hall, 600 Hall and 800/900 Halls Medication Carts) - LVN B failed to ensure the Medication carts for 500 Hall and 600 Hall was not left unlocked, unsecured, and unattended. -DON failed to ensure the Medication cart for 800/900 Halls was not left unlocked, unsecured, and unattended. These failures could affect the residents, who received medications from those carts, by placing them at risk of drug diversions or misuse of medications. Findings included: During an observation on 11/3/23 at 4:46 p.m., revealed the 500 Hall medication cart and the 600 Hall medication cart was unlocked and unattended in front on the nurse station. All the drawers of the medication could be opened, and the medication was easily accessible. The cart was unattended for unknown amount of time. Residents were observed passing by the medication cart. During an interview on 11/3/23 at 4:49 p.m., LVN B was sitting behind the nurse station…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source, are reported immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, for 1 of 2 facility self-reported incidents reviewed for reporting to the State Survey Agency. (Incident #461859) The facility failed to report to Health and Human Services Commission within 2 hours when CNA C spilled hot coffee on Resident #2 abdomen, resulting in burn/blisters. This failure could place the residents at risk for increased risk for abuse and neglect. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet, printed on 11/3/23, indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to facility on 11/03/22 with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non dominant side (paralysis of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement written policies to prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation for 1 of 7 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for abuse. The facility staff did not implement their abuse policy when they did not report to the state agency or investigate Resident #1's scalp hematoma (a bad bruise that occurs when an injury causes blood to collect and pool under the skin; the pooling blood gives the skin a spongy, rubbery, lumpy feel) that was discovered on 09/21/23. This failure could place residents at risk for abuse and neglect due to staff not reporting or investigating incidents to rule out abuse and neglect. Findings include: Record review of the facility's Abuse/Neglect policy revised 3/29/18 indicated, The resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation .The facility will identify and investigate events that may constitute abuse/neglect. The facility will determine the direction of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after forming the suspicion, if the events that cause the suspicion result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the suspicion do not result in serious bodily injury for 1 of 7 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility staff did not report Resident #1's Resident #1's scalp hematoma (a bad bruise that occurs when an injury causes blood to collect and pool under the skin; the pooling blood gives the skin a spongy, rubbery, lumpy feel) that was discovered on 09/21/23 to the state agency. This failure could place residents at risk of injuries, abuse, and/or neglect due to staff not reporting incidents as required. Findings include: Record review of the face sheet dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed have evidence that all alleged violations are thoroughly investigated for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility did not provide evidence of a thorough investigation for Resident #1's scalp hematoma (a bad bruise that occurs when an injury causes blood to collect and pool under the skin; the pooling blood gives the skin a spongy, rubbery, lumpy feel.) which was first discovered on 9/21/23. This failure could place residents at risk of abuse and neglect due to the facility not performing a thorough investigation to rule out abuse and neglect. Findings include: Record review of the facility's Abuse/Neglect policy revised 3/29/18 indicated, The resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation .The facility will identify and investigate events that may constitute abuse/neglect. The facility will determine the direction of the investigation based on a thorough…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-17 · tag F0644 — pattern
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program (PASRR) to the maximum extent practicable to avoid duplicative testing and effort for 3 of 5 (Resident #9, Resident #12, and Resident #25) residents reviewed for PASRR. The facility failed to ensure Resident #9 had quarterly PASRR IDT meetings. The facility failed to ensure Resident #12 had quarterly PASRR IDT meetings. The facility failed to convene Resident #25's initial PASRR IDT meeting. These failures could affect residents with mental illnesses and place them at risk of not being assessed to receive needed services. Findings include: 1.Record review of Resident #9's face sheet dated 05/17/23 indicated a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #9 had a diagnoses which included progressive dementia (progressive disease that destroys memory), major depressive disorder (depressed mood that causes impairment in daily life) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to meet resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs identified in the comprehensive assessment for 3 of 13 residents (Resident #25, Resident #28, and Resident #30) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to care plan that Resident #25 and Resident #28 were PASRR positive. The facility failed to ensure Resident #30's care plan reflected he had a condom catheter. These failures could place the residents at increased risk of not having their individual needs met and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: 1. Record review of a face sheet dated 05/17/2023, indicated Resident #25 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included bipolar disorder (a disorder associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from depression lows to manic highs), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure necessary services to maintain grooming and personal hygiene were provided for 3 of 13 residents reviewed for ADLs (Resident #16, Resident #17, and Resident #23). The facility failed to provide assistance with facial hair removal for Resident #16. The facility failed to ensure Resident #17, and Resident #23 received showers or bed baths as scheduled. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving services and care, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: 1. Record review of a face sheet dated 05/17/2023, indicated Resident #16 was a [AGE] year old female initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications (a condition that happens because of a problem in the way the body regulates and uses sugar as a fuel), essential hypertension (high blood pressure), and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 4 of 4 staff (CNA B, CNA C, LVN D, and the Housekeeping Supervisor) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure the Housekeeping Supervisor covered the clean linen cart while passing out resident's personal laundry. The facility failed to ensure CNA B and CNA C changed gloves and performed hand hygiene while providing incontinent care to Resident #28. The facility failed to ensure LVN D changed gloves while providing wound care to Resident #20. These failures could place residents and staff at risk for cross-contamination and the spread of infection. Findings included: 1. During an observation on 05/15/2023 starting at 3:26 PM, the Housekeeping Supervisor was passing out clean linen on hall 500. The clean linen cart was not covered. The clothes hanging from the cart were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-17 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to assure residents who have authorized the facility in writing to manage any personal funds have ready and reasonable access to those funds for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #12 and Resident #23) reviewed for personal funds. The facility failed to ensure Resident #12, and Resident #23 had access to their personal funds when they requested it. This failure could place residents whose funds are managed by the facility at risk of not receiving their personal funds deposited with the facility and not having their rights and preferences honored. Findings included: 1. Record review of a face sheet dated 05/17/2023 indicated Resident #12 was a [AGE] year old female initially admitted to the facility 06/12/2018 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included type 2 diabetes mellitus (a condition that happens because of a problem in the way the body regulates and uses sugar as a fuel resulting in high blood sugars), hypertensive heart disease with heart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-17 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident was informed before, or at the time of admission, and periodically during the residents stay, of services available in the facility and of changes for those services, which included changes for services not covered under Medicare/Medicaid or by the facility's per diem rate for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #20) reviewed for Medicare/Medicaid coverage. The facility failed to ensure Resident #20 was given a SNF ABN when discharged from skilled services at the facility prior to covered days being exhausted. Resident #20 did not incur any out-of-pocket cost. This failure could place residents at risk for not being aware of changes to provided services. Findings include: Record review of Resident #20's face sheet, dated 05/17/2023, indicated Resident #20 was a [AGE] year-old female, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis which included type 2 diabetes (blood sugar disorder), chronic kidney disease (loss of kidney…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-17 · tag F0635 — isolated
    Provide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have physician orders for the resident's immediate care for 1 of 13 residents (Resident #30) reviewed for admission physician orders. The facility failed to ensure Resident #30 had a physician order for a condom catheter. This failure could place resident at risk for not receiving appropriate care, treatment services, and at risk for infection. Findings included: Record review of Resident # 30's face sheet dated 05/16/23 revealed Resident #30 was a [AGE] year-old male that was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (disease of the brain), type 2 diabetes (blood sugar disorder) and hypertension (high blood pressure). Record review of Resident #30's comprehensive MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #30 made himself understood and was able to understand others clearly. Resident #30 had a BIMS score of 15 indicating he was cognitively intact. Section H of the MDS indicated Resident #30 had an indwelling…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-17 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the resident status for 1 of 13 residents (Resident #9) reviewed for MDS assessment accuracy. The facility failed to accurately reflect Resident #9's medications on the MDS assessment on 04/15/2023 when the MDS reflected Resident #9 was on the antidepressant and Resident #9 had no order for an antidepressant. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs. Findings included: Record review of Resident #9's face sheet dated 05/17/23 indicated a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #9 had a diagnoses which included progressive dementia (progressive disease that destroys memory), major depressive disorder (depressed mood that causes impairment in daily life) and hemiplegia (weakness on one side of the body). Record review of Resident #9's Comprehensive MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #9 had a BIMS score of 12 which indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-17 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to develop the baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #25) reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #25 had a baseline care plan completed within 48 hours of admission. This failure could affect residents by not addressing their physical, mental, and psychosocial needs for each resident to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial outcome. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 05/17/2023, indicated Resident #25 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included bipolar disorder (a disorder associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from depression lows to manic highs), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs), and essential hypertension (high blood pressure). Record review of Resident #25's Baseline Care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop, review, and revise a comprehensive care plan of each resident that included measurable objectives and timetables to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs for 1 of 13 residents (Resident #9) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #9's care plan was updated and revised to reflect she was not taking any antidepressant medications. These failures could cause the resident to not receive the correct care impacting the patient's health and/or serious illness. Findings include: Record review of Resident #9's face sheet dated 05/17/23 indicated a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #9 had a diagnoses which included progressive dementia (progressive disease that destroys memory), major depressive disorder (depressed mood that causes impairment in daily life) and hemiplegia (weakness on one side of the body). Record review of Resident #9's Comprehensive MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-17 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #28) reviewed for incontinence. The facility failed to ensure Resident #28 was provided prompt incontinent care. This failure could place residents at risk for urinary tract infections, skin breakdown, and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #28's Order Summary Report dated 5/15/2023 indicated he was a [AGE] year-old male readmitted to the facility on [DATE], initially admitted [DATE], with diagnoses which included major depressive disorder, recurrent, severe with psychotic symptoms (a serious mood disorder involving one or more episodes of intense psychological depression or loss of interest or pleasure that lasts two or more weeks), hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-17 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that it was free of medication error rate of 5 percent or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 10.34%, based on 3 errors out of 29 opportunities, which involved 1 of 6 residents (Resident #10) reviewed for medication administration. The facility failed to ensure Resident #10 received Methocarbamol (treat muscle spasms/pain, and Tylenol (treat aches and pain). This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of their medications or receiving them as prescribed, per physician orders. Findings included: Record review of Resident #10's order summary report, dated 05/16/2023, indicated Resident #10 was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis included dementia (loss of memory, language, problem solving and other thinking abilities that were severe enough to interfere with daily life), essential hypertension (high blood pressure), and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with State and Federal laws, all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 1 of 3 medication carts (Hall 6/8/9) reviewed for storage of medications. The facility failed to ensure Hall 6/8/9 medication cart was locked when unattended. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of medication misuse and diversion. Findings included: During an observation on 05/16/2023 at 10:25 a.m., the DON left Hall 6/8/9 medication cart unlocked and out of sight, facing Resident #82's room, while administering Resident #82's medication. During an interview on 05/16/2023 at 11:15 a.m. the DON stated she should have locked the medication cart prior to going in Resident #82's room. When asked why she did not lock the cart, she stated, I forgot. The DON stated this failure allowed residents, staff, and visitors access to other residents' medication. During an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$79,953 in federal fines across 5 penalties.

  • $27,600 — penalty dated 2025-08-15
  • $19,630 — penalty dated 2025-04-23
  • $16,340 — penalty dated 2024-07-11
  • $8,190 — penalty dated 2023-10-12
  • $8,193 — penalty dated 2023-10-12

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CREATIVE SOLUTIONS IN HEALTHCARE — 149 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.7-1.7 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.1+0.9 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.2+0.8 vs chain
The other 148 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)
1 of 5Afton Oaks Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterHouston, TX 1 of 5Arlington Heights Health and Rehabilitation CenterFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Beltline Healthcare CenterGarland, TX 1 of 5Bluebonnet Nursing & RehabilitationKarnes City, TX 1 of 5Bluebonnet Point WellnessBullard, TX 1 of 5Brentwood Terrace Healthcare And RehabilitationParis, TX 1 of 5Buena Vida Nursing and Rehab-San AntonioSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Cottonwood Nursing & RehabilitationDenton, TX 1 of 5Dogwood Trails ManorWoodville, TX 1 of 5Downtown Health and Rehabilitation CenterFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Estates Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Fair Park Health & Rehabilitation CenterDallas, TX 1 of 5Five Points Nursing & Rehabilitation of College StCollege Station, TX 1 of 5Five Points at Lake Highlands Nursing and RehabDallas, TX 1 of 5Five Points of PflugervillePflugerville, TX 1 of 5Franklin Heights Nursing & RehabilitationEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Gilmer Nursing & RehabilitationGilmer, TX 1 of 5Grace Pointe Wellness CenterEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Graham Oaks Care CenterGraham, TX 1 of 5Granbury Care CenterGranbury, TX 1 of 5Greenhill VillasMount Pleasant, TX 1 of 5Heritage At Longview Healthcare CenterLongview, TX 1 of 5Huebner Creek Health & Rehabilitation CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Interlochen Health and Rehabilitation CenterArlington, TX 1 of 5Kenedy Health & RehabilitationKenedy, TX 1 of 5Kennedy Health & RehabLufkin, TX 1 of 5Lake Lodge Nursing & RehabilitationLake Worth, TX 1 of 5Lampstand Nursing and RehabilitationBryan, TX 1 of 5Lancaster Nursing & RehabilitationLancaster, TX 1 of 5Marine Creek Nursing & RehabilitationFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Mesa Vista Inn Health CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Mountain View Health & RehabilitationEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Navasota Nursing & RehabilitationNavasota, TX 1 of 5Normandy Terrace Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5North Pointe Nursing and RehabilitationWatauga, TX 1 of 5Park Place Care CenterGeorgetown, TX 1 of 5Parkview Manor Nursing and RehabilitationWeimar, TX 1 of 5Peach Tree PlaceWeatherford, TX 1 of 5Pebble Creek Nursing CenterEl Paso, TX 1 of 5Pecan Tree Rehab And Healthcare CenterGainesville, TX

Showing 40 of 148; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
FANNIN COUNTY HOSPITAL AUTHORITYOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 10/01/2024
HOLT, ERINIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 10/01/2024
KEETON, WENDYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 10/01/2024
KISSLING, MONICAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 10/01/2024
MCBEAN, PATRICIAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 10/01/2024
SANDERSON, CLARKIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTORsince 10/01/2024
TROMPLER, KELLYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 10/01/2024
HUGGINS, LINDAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2024
TERRELL I ENTERPRISES, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2024
BLAKE, GARYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2024
BLAKE, MALISAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2024
TANKERSLEY, DIONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2024
WILLIG, ZACHARYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2024
HONOR X ENTERPRISES, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/23/2025
TERRELL I REALTY, L.L.C.OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2024
EAMIGUEL, CHRISTOPHERIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2024
HEKIMIAN, KHORENIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$2.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-37.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 61%Medicare 5%Other / private 34%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$281per resident / day
operating cost
$8,552per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$204per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675105. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next