Park Village Healthcare and Rehabilitation
207 E Parkerville Rd, Desoto, TX 75115 · For profit - Corporation · 150 certified beds · (972) 230-1000 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0610) — most recent Nov 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 5 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $221,389 in federal fines (most recent 2025-10-01)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 8.2% | 15.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.3% | 3.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 2.4% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.8% | 3.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 8.5% | 14.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 17.7% | 18.0% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.0% | 3.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 9.0% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 1.5% | 9.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 82.5% | 88.0% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 21.3% | 25.7% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 18.9% | 12.3% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.67 | 2.17 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.13 | 2.06 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Met the expected recovery: 69.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 36 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.91 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 96% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.6%CMS range 7.0–17.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 69.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 52.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 55.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 94.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.8% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.31 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 150 beds and averages 106.2 residents a day — about 71% occupied, or roughly 44 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.05 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.25 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.71 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.60 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.23 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.30 to 0.13 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
52 citations, most serious first. The 18 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-11-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse and neglect for 2 of 8 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for abuse and neglect.The facility failed to ensure there was no inappropriate sexual behavior between Resident #1 and Resident #2. Resident #1 was observed in the dining room by CNA-A massaging the breast of Resident #2.An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 11/14/25. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 7:12 PM. While the IJ was removed on 11/15/25, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated with the severity level at a potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy, because all staff had not been trained. This failure placed other female residents at risk and or potential risk of abuse/neglect Findings Included: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 11/15/25 reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted into the facility 09/22/25 with a diagnosis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-11-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have evidence that all allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, were thoroughly investigated for 2 of 18 residents (Resident #1, Resident #2) reviewed for abuse and neglect.The facility failed to thoroughly investigate inappropriate sexual behavior between Resident #1 and Resident #2. Resident #1 was observed in the dining room by CNA-A massaging the breast of Resident #2.An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 11/14/25. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 7:12 PM. While the IJ was removed on 11/15/25, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated with the severity level at a potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy, because all staff had not been trained. This failure could place residents at risk for abuse/neglect and could lead to a diminished quality of life and psychosocial harm. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 11/15/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility is free of pests and rodents for 1 (Resident #1's room) of 8 residents room reviewed for pest. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's room was free of ants on 07/20/25. As a result of the bites Resident#1 was transported to the local hospital and admitted on [DATE].Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility is free of pests and rodents for 1 (Resident #1's room) of 8 residents room reviewed for pest. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's room was free of ants on 07/20/25. As a result of the bites Resident#1 was transported to the local hospital and admitted on [DATE]. The non-compliance was identified as past non-compliance (PNC). The IJ began on 07/20/25 and ended on 07/21/25. The facility had corrected the non-compliance before the state's investigation began. These…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-03-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Control Program designed to help prevent the transmission of disease and infection; maintain a system for preventing, identifying, reporting, investigating, and controlling infections and communicable diseases for all residents, staff, volunteers, and visitors; follow accepted national standards; follow a system of surveillance designed to identify possible communicable diseases or infections before they could spread to other persons in the facility; follow standard and transmission-based precautions to prevent spread of infections for twenty eight residents (Residents #1, #6, #7, #8, #10, #11, #13, #15, #19, #20, #27, #28, #38, #41, #44, #48, #49, #52, #54, #55, #57, #60, #63, #64, #66, #69, #71, and #73) of seventy three residents reviewed for infection and two (Resident #1 and #59) of three residents observed for incontinence care and one (Resident #277) of one resident observed for wound care. The facility failed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-10-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to immediately consult with the resident's physician when there was a significant change in the resident's condition or need to alter treatment significantly for one (Resident #1) of 22 residents reviewed for notification of changes. The facility failed to promptly identify and intervene for an acute change in a resident's condition related to type 2 diabetes, resulting in the family calling 911 to transport the resident to the hospital. The resident was admitted to the hospital with increased confusion, poor wound healing, hyperglycemia (elevated blood sugar levels), and septicemia (bacterial blood infection). LVN B (Agency Nurse) failed to consult with the physician or physician assistant when Resident #1's blood sugars were greater than 200 on 9/24/2023. LVN A failed to consult with the physician or physician assistant when Resident #1's blood sugars were greater than 200 on 9/25/2023 and 10/18/2023. This failure could place residents at risk for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2023-10-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices, as based on the comprehensive assessment of the resident; in that: The facility failed to promptly identify and intervene for complications of acute hyperglycemia (high blood sugar) for one (Resident #1) of 22 residents reviewed for hyperglycemia related to type 2 diabetes, resulting in the family calling 911 to transport the resident to the hospital. This failure could place residents at risk for delayed interventions in treatment when glucose levels spike or drop due to underlining conditions. Moreover, this failure is likely to cause severe injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death in residents with medical histories positive for sepsis, chronic kidney disease, infections, cancer, and diabetes. This failure resulted in the identification of Immediate Jeopardy (IJ)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-10-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 1 (Resident #2) of 5 residents reviewed for abuse.The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 was free from abuse when Resident #1 punched him on 09/09/25, causing Resident #2 to have a scratch on his nose.This failure could place residents at risk for severe and long-lasting impacts on physical, psychological, and emotional wellbeing.Findings included:Resident #2Record review of Resident #2's MDS Assessment, dated 09/04/2025, reflected the Resident#2 was a [AGE] year-old male who originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. He had BIMS score of 5 indicating severe cognitive impairment. His diagnoses included Non-Alzheimer's Dementia (cognitive decline that is not caused by Alzheimer's disease), Cerebrovascular Accident (a medical term for a condition where there's a sudden interruption of blood flow to the brain, causing damage to brain tissue), and hemiplegia (a medical condition that causes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents. The facility failed to safely transfer Resident #1 and prevent and injury during the use of the mechanical Hoyer lift, which resulted in the resident sustaining a laceration to the head, requiring six staples at the hospital. This failure could place resident at risk for accidents, injuries, and hospitalization. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's undated face sheet revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-entered on 08/20/23. Her diagnoses included spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy, muscle weakness, lack of coordination, need for assistance with personal care, flexion deformity of the right elbow, and age-related osteoporosis without current pathological fracture. Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS dated [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-05-14 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, including information for agency and contract staff, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data in a uniform format according to specifications established by CMS for 1 (CMS for FY Quarter 1 2026) of 4 quarters reviewed for compliance. The facility failed to submit accurate staffing information to CMS for FY Quarter 1 2026 (October 1-December 31). This failure could place residents at risk for personal needs not being identified and met, decreased quality of care, decline in health status, and decreased feelings of well-being within their living environment.Findings included: Review of the CMS PBJ report for CMS for CMS for FY Quarter 1 2026 (October 1-December 31) indicated the facility failed to submit RN coverage for the quarter. During an interview with the Administrator on 05/13/26 at 11:17 AM, he stated Corporate resourced out the facility's PBJ requirements, and the data for FY Quarter 1 2026 (October 1-December 31)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to facility properly labeled and stored all drugs and biological in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for medications on 3(300 hall, 100 South Hall, and 100 North Hall) of 4 medication carts reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure Zofran 4 mg prescription medication used to prevent and treat nausea and vomiting was labeled with patients' labels on the 100-south hall -medication cart. The facility failed to ensure Linezolid 600mg prescription antibiotic primarily used to treat bacterial infections was labeled with patients' labels on the 100-south hall -medication cart. The facility failed to ensure Cospt prescription eye drop used to lower the fluid pressure inside your eye in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension (both involve high eye pressure due to improper fluid drainage) was labeled with patients' label on the 100-south hall -medication cart. The facility failed to ensure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure individuals with mental disorders were evaluated and received care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #10) reviewed for PASRR Level I screenings. The facility did not correctly identify Resident #10 as having a mental illness and did not complete a new PASRR Level I Screening. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving adequate services or care related to mental illnesses.Findings included: Review of Resident #10's MDS, dated [DATE], reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a BIMS score of 3, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Diagnoses included Schizoaffective Disorder (a mental health condition where someone experiences symptoms of schizophrenia, hallucinations or disorganized thinking, along with major mood episodes such as depression or mania). Record review of Resident #10's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that included instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care for the resident that met professional standards of care within 48 hours of the resident's admission for one (Resident #98) of five residents reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility failed to complete a baseline care plan for Resident #98 within 48 hours of her admission. This failure could place newly admitted residents at risk of not receiving effective and person-centered care and services.Findings included: Review of Resident #98's Face Sheet, dated 05/14/26, reflected she was an [AGE] year-old female, who admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Parkinsonism (a syndrome marked by tremor, muscular rigidity, and slow and difficult movement, occurring as a result of disease of the nervous system or exposure to certain drugs and toxins, and as a neurodegenerative disorder of unknown…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation for 2 Residents (Resident# 103 and Resident# 8) of 6 Residents reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure proper storage and disposal of Resident #103's Tramadol HCL tab 50mg- (controlled medication) by taping a narcotic medication and storing it in the medication cart. The facility failed to ensure properly disposal of Resident #8's hydrocodone 5-325mg (controlled medication) which expired on [DATE]. These failures could place residents at risk of drug diversion, medication error, and risk of pills contamination due to broken seals.Findings included: Resident#8 Review of Resident #8's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated [DATE], reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE], and had a BIMs score of 15 which indicated she was cognitively intact. The resident had diagnoses which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — isolatedHave policies on smoking.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish and implement smoking safety policies and procedures for 1 (Resident #59) of 6 residents reviewed for smoking safety. The facility failed to complete an initial smoking assessment for Resident #59 to determine the resident's ability to smoke safely, need for supervision, and appropriate smoking interventions in accordance with facility smoking policies. This failure placed residents at risk for smoking related accidents, burns, and other safety hazards.Findings included: Record review of Resident #59's MDS, dated [DATE], reflected he was an [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. He had a BIMS score of 9, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. His diagnoses included dependence on renal dialysis (routine dialysis treatments because the kidneys are no longer able to filter waste and fluid from the body on their own), Record review of Resident #59's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 05/12/26, reflected he was at risk for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-05 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for assessments: The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 09/23/25, included the behavior of wandering in Section E of the assessment. These failures could place residents at risk for inadequate care.Findings include:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 10/07/25, reflected an [AGE] year-old male, who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included Heart Failure, Schizoaffective Disorder (mental disorder with persistent hallucinations, delusions, disorganized thinking and speech, and bizarre or inappropriate behavior), Insomnia (difficulty falling asleep or staying asleep), Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing which can lead to choking), Repeated Falls, Type 2 Diabetes (body does not use insulin effectively or does not produce enough insulin), Essential Hypertension (High…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 (Resident #1) of 6 residents, reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed to address Resident #1's wandering behavior and note interventions prior to 09/30/25. This failure could place resideFindings Include:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 10/07/25, reflected an [AGE] year-old male, who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses included Heart Failure, Schizoaffective Disorder (mental disorder with persistent hallucinations, delusions, disorganized thinking and speech, and bizarre or inappropriate behavior), Insomnia (difficulty falling asleep or staying asleep), Dysphagia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with professional standards and practices, medical records were maintained on each resident that that were complete and accurately documented for 1 of 6 resident records (Resident #1) reviewed for treatment documentation. The facility failed to document Resident #1's routine wandering since his admission on [DATE] and his increased wandering about 2-4 weeks before 09/30/25.The facility failed to ensure 8 of Resident #1's Elopement Wandering Assessments, did not note an incorrect diagnosis of Dementia.This failure could place residents at risk of medical records not being an accurate representation of medical condition or medical needs.Findings include:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 10/07/25, reflected an [AGE] year-old male, who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included Heart Failure, Schizoaffective Disorder (mental disorder with persistent hallucinations, delusions,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to immediately inform the resident, consult with the resident's physician and notify, consistent with his or her authority, the resident representative when there was a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status in either life-threatening conditions or clinical complications for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #2) reviewed had a change of condition.The facility staff failed to notify the designated representative and the NP of Resident #2 that she had been sexually abused by Resident #1.This failure could place residents at risk for abuse/neglect and could lead to a diminished quality of life and psychosocial harm. Findings included:Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 11/15/25 reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted into the facility 09/22/25 with a diagnosis of senile degeneration of brain (a general term for a decline in memory, thinking, and other cognitive abilities associated with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 34 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately, but not later than 24 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involve abuse to the administrator of the facility and to other officials including to the State Survey Agency in accordance with State law through established procedures for 2 of 8 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for abuse and neglect.The facility did not make a report to local law enforcement or State Survey Agency (HHS) of an allegation on 11/05/25 when Resident #1 was found in the dining room massaging the breast of Resident #2 after he had taken off her adult brief. This failure could place residents at risk harm to include sexual abuse and could lead to diminished quality of life and psychosocial harm.Record review of Resident #2's face…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for two (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of five residents, reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure LVN A wore the appropriate PPE and performed hand hygiene during wound care for Resident #1. 2. The facility failed to ensure CNA C and CNA D performed hand hygiene during incontinence care for Resident #2. This failure placed residents at risk for healthcare associated cross contamination and infections. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 06/24/25, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His cognitive skills for daily decision making were moderately impaired. His diagnoses included high blood pressure. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen safety. 1. The cook failed to sanitize the thermometer between checking breakfast food on 06/20/25. 2. The cook failed to check the temperature of the cinnamon rolls, biscuits and fried eggs before they were served to the residents, These deficient practices could affect residents who received meals and/or snacks from the facility's only kitchen by placing them at risk for cross contamination and other food-borne illnesses. Findings included: Observation on 06/20/25 at 6:48 am to 7:40 am, the [NAME] checked the temperature of the scrambled eggs and wiped the thermometer off with a rag that was seating on the cart beside her. The [NAME] checked the temperature of the oatmeal, grits, puree sausage and puree eggs and did not sanitize the thermometer between checking each item. The [NAME] did not check the temperatures of the cinnamon rolls, biscuits, and fried…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-20 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public for 2 (Halls 100 and 400) of 3 halls reviewed for environmental concerns. 1. The facility failed to lock 2 Hoyer lifts , bed with mattress, bed frame in the hallway on 06/19/25 could be a fall risk and injury concern and issue for residents. 2. The facility failed to lock 1 Hoyer lift, bed frame and left pallet seating upright by the storage supply closet on 06/20/25 could be a fall risk and injury concern and issue for residents. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of falls, injuries, and decreased quality of life. The findings included: Observation on 06/19/25 at 10:40 am on hall 100 revealed there was an unlocked bed and unlocked bed frame on hall 100. Observation on 06/19/25 at 10:50 am on hall 400 revealed there was an unlocked Hoyer lift and unlocked bed frame. Interview on 06/19/25 between 1:00 pm to 1:40 pm, CNA D, CNA E and CNA F stated the nursing staff were responsible to lock…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments and permit only authorized personnel to have access for one (Hall 400) of three medication carts reviewed for pharmacy services. On 06/19/25, LVN A failed to ensure medication cart was locked when not being used at the nursing station on Hall 400. This failure could place residents at risk of having access to unauthorized medications and/or lead to possible harm or drug diversion. Findings included: Observation on 06/19/25 at 11:10 am revealed the medication cart was unlocked in front of the nurse's station. The drawers faced the hallway, and no staff was in sight. LVN A walked by the medication cart and pressed the lock closed and left 400 Hall with a resident. The medication cart was left unlocked for approximately 5 minutes and no residents and visitors were in the area at that time. Interview on 06/19/25 at 11:20 am, LVN-PRN B stated the medication cart should be locked when not in use because residents could take medications out of the cart and take…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-28 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right to file grievances anonymously for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for grievances. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had access to file a grievance anonymously. The facility's failure could place the residents at risk for concerns not being reported and addressed. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's MDS admission assessment, dated 02/19/25, reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her BIMS score was 12. Her cognitive status was moderately impaired. Her diagnoses included stroke and diabetes. Record review of the Facility Grievances for April 2025 and May 2025 reflected there were four grievances completed for Resident #1, but none of them were filed anonymously. An interview on 05/28/25 at 11:00 AM with Resident #1 revealed she had a personal notebook that she wrote her complaints in. She said she would have a nurse make a copy of the document and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary services for residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 3 (Resident #14, Resident #64, Resident #69) of 6 residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to ensure: 1- Resident #14 had his fingernails trimmed on 03/18/25. 2- Resident #64 had her fingernails cleaned and trimmed on 03/19/25. 3- Resident #69 had her fingernails cleaned and trimmed on 03/19/25. These failures could place residents who were dependent on staff for ADL care at risk for loss of dignity, risk for infections and a decreased quality of life. Findings include: 1-Review of Resident#14's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #14 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses included cerebral infarction (a condition where blood flow to the brain is interrupted, causing brain tissue to die), muscle wasting, and cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-24 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — patternProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to assist residents in obtaining routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for 1 of 8 residents (Residents #36) reviewed for dental services. The facility failed to provide timely dental services for Resident #36 when he started having tooth pain on 02/11/25. This failure could place residents at risk of oral complications, dental pain, and diminished quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #36's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]with the diagnoses of stroke, cognitive communication deficit, and unspecified pain. His BIMS score was a 13 (intact cognition). Record review of Resident #36's care plan revealed a focus area communication problem due to expressive aphasia and slurring. Interventions included encouraging resident to continue to state his thoughts if he was having difficulty, assist with finding words as needed/appropriate, and monitor/document for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly and comfortable interior environment for one residents' room (room [ROOM NUMBER] 301 ) of 6 residents' rooms reviewed for clean and sanitary environment. The shared bathroom in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] 301 had a water leak coming from underneath the toilet seat crossing in front of the sink and going to the shower drain. These failures could affect residents by placing them at risk of not having a clean, sanitary, and comfortable environment. Findings included: 1. Observation of Resident #69, and Resident#32's shared bathroom on 03/18/2 at 10:41 AM showed a water leak coming from underneath the toilet seat crossing in front of the sink and going to the shower drain. Observation/Interview with Maintenance Director on 03/19/25 at 09:02 AM he looked at the bathroom floor in room [ROOM NUMBER] 301 and stated it may have a leak somewhere. He flushed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents right to be free from physical abuse by Resident #60 for 1 resident (Resident #6) of 24 residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. On 01/25/25, Resident # 60 swung at Resident #6 and hit Resident # 6's right eye. Resident # 6 sustained bruising under the right eye. This failure placed the facility's residents at risk for abuse and neglect. Findings included: Record review of Resident #6's annual MDS, dated [DATE], reflected she was an [AGE] year-old female originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia (loss of intellectual functioning, especially with impairment of memory and abstract thinking, and often with personality change, resulting from organic disease of the brain), hypertension (elevated blood pressure), and diabetes mellitus (elevated blood sugar). Resident#6 has a BIMS score of 02/15 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Record review of the Resident#60…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately report an alleged act of abuse to the State Survey Agency, for 2 residents (Resident #6 and 60) of 24 residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility failed to immediately report an allegation of physical abuse. This failure placed the facility's residents at risk for abuse and neglect. Findings included: Record review of Resident #6's annual MDS, dated [DATE], reflected she was an [AGE] year-old female originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia (loss of intellectual functioning, especially with impairment of memory and abstract thinking, and often with personality change, resulting from organic disease of the brain), hypertension (elevated blood pressure), and diabetes mellitus (elevated blood sugar). Resident#6 has a BIMS score of 02/15 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Record review of the Resident#60 Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], reflected she was [AGE] years…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to ensure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing and administering, of medications for 2 (Nursing Medication cart hall 100 North and nursing medication cart 300 hall) of 3 medication carts reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure prompt identification of potential diversion of controlled medications when CMA B did not report a damaged blister pack of Clobazam 20 mg (controlled medication) and LVN D C did not report a damaged blister pack of Tylenol with Codeine#4 oral tablet 300-60 mg (controlled medication). This failure could place residents at risk of not having their medication available due to possible drug diversion and at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of the medication. Findings included: Record review of Resident #31's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 01/12/25, reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male with admission date of 08/30/24. Resident #31's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-24 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure the call system was within reach of the resident, and accessible to a resident lying on the floor for 2 Residents' rooms bathroom (room [ROOM NUMBER] 302, room [ROOM NUMBER] 303) of 6 residents' rooms bathrooms reviewed for residents' call systems. - The facility failed to ensure the call light system was accessible to a resident lying on the floor in the residents' toilets located in the secured unit room [ROOM NUMBER] 302 - The facility failed to ensure the call light system string was not missing, and was accessible to a resident, including a resident lying on the floor in the residents' toilets located in the secured unit room [ROOM NUMBER] 303 This failure could place residents in the facility at risk of being unable to have a means of directly contacting caregivers. Findings included: room [ROOM NUMBER] 302 -Observation on 03/18/25 at 09:55 AM resident toilet call light pull string was entwined on grab bar fixture next to the toilet. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident has the right to reside and receive services in the facility with accommodation of resident needs and preferences for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for reasonable accommodation of needs. The facility failed to ensure the call light system was within reach of the Resident #1 lying in bed. This failure could place residents in the facility at risk of being unable to have a means of directly contacting caregivers. Findings included: A record review of Resident #1's MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male with a BIMS score 00 of 15, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Resident #1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses including, neurogenic bladder, multiple sclerosis, and hemiplegia or hemiparesis (Hemiplegia: paralysis of one side of the body) with left elbow, and left wrist contracture. The review further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for one (Resident #1) of one resident reviewed for catheter care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's urine catheter drainage bag kept off the floor when Resident#1 was lying in bed. This failure could place residents at risk for urinary tract infections. Findings included: A record review of Resident #1's MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male with a BIMS score 00 of 15, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Resident #1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses including, neurogenic bladder ( urinary bladder dysfunction cause by nervous system conditions), multiple sclerosis, and hemiplegia or hemiparesis (Hemiplegia: paralysis of one side of the body). The review further reflected the resident had an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 (Resident #2) of 5 residents reviewed for infection control LVN A failed to wear appropriate PPE when providing suprapubic catheter care for Resident #2 who supposed to be on EBP ( Enhanced Barrier Precautions). This failure placed the residents at risk of exposure to possible infectious agents. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral palsy, neurogenic bladder, mild intellectual disabilities, and needs for assistance with personal care. Resident#2 has a BIMS score of 12/15 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Her Functional Status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations, and record reviews the facility failed to provide a safe environment for five (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, #5) of 12 residents reviewed for safe environment. The facility failed to ensure Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, #5's rooms were free from black ants from 08/04/24 to 08/26/24. Theses failures could place all residents at risk for ant bites, which could cause skin infections, allergic reactions, skin tears, scratches, scarring, and rashes resulting in pain and decline in health and psychosocial well-being. Findings included: 1) Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed, a [AGE] year-old male who admitted [DATE] with the ability to express ideas and wants, able to see in adequate light without corrective lenses. He had a staff assisted BIMS score of 01 (Modified independence cognition) and upper and lower one-sided weakness. He used a wheelchair and was diagnosed with anemia (low iron), renal insufficiency (kidney failure), Diabetes Mellitus,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible for five (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4 #5) of 12 residents reviewed for incident accidents. The Nursing staff failed to ensure black ants were not in Residents #1, #2, #3, #4 and #5's rooms and beds. These failures could place residents at risk of being bitten by ants causing skin irritation, skin infection and pain resulting in decreased health and psychosocial well-being. Findings included: 1) Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed, a [AGE] year-old male who admitted [DATE] with the ability to express ideas and wants, able to see in adequate light without corrective lenses. He had a staff assisted BIMS score of 01 (Modified independence cognition) and upper and lower one-sided weakness. He used a wheelchair and was diagnosed with anemia (low iron), renal insufficiency (kidney failure), Diabetes Mellitus, Cerebral Vascular…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, the facility must maintain medical records on each resident that were accurately documented and must contain a record of the resident's assessment for five residents (Residents #1, #2, #3 #4 and #5) of 12 residents reviewed for Medical Records. The Nursing staff failed to ensure incident reports, skin assessments and Nurse progress notes were completed after reports of black ants were found in the rooms and beds of Residents #1, #2, #3, #4 and #5. These failures could affect all residents by placing them at risk of not being properly monitored and treated if documentation were not completed, accurate or missing which could result in decline in their health and psycho-social well-being. Findings included: 1)Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed, a [AGE] year-old male who admitted [DATE] with the ability to express ideas and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-30 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observation, and record reviews the facility failed to Maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility is free of pests in Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5's rooms reviewed for pest control. The facility failed to ensure Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5's rooms were free from black ants from 08/04/24 to 08/26/24. Theses failures could place all residents at risk for ant bites, which could cause skin infections, allergic reactions, skin tears, scratches, scarring, and rashes resulting in pain and decline in health and psychosocial well-being. Findings included: Record review of the Facility's Pest Sightings log sheet in the Pest Control binder from 05/10/24 to 08/27/24 revealed, Ants: Resident #3 and Resident #4's was treated on 08/20/24 by Maintenance Assistant K. (There was no reports about ants in Residents #1, #2 and #5's rooms. Record review of the Facility's Electronic Maintenance Work order system from 05/01/24 - 08/28/24 revealed: 08/26/24: Ants in Resident #5's room,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments and permit only authorized personnel to have access for one (Treatment Cart #1) of two treatment carts reviewed. The facility failed to ensure Treatment Cart #1 was locked when unattended. This failure could place residents at risk of having access to unauthorized medications and/or lead to possible harm or drug diversion. Findings included: In an observation on 08/03/24 at 10:10 AM, Treatment Cart #1 was observed unlocked and unattended in the 100 Hall area. There were 4 residents in the immediate area, and no staff with visibility to the cart. The following items were observed in the cart: Hydrogen Peroxide Saline Alcohol Wipes Ketoconazole Shampoo Nystatin Topical Powder Zinc Oxide Ointment Hydrocortisone Cream In an interview on 08/03/24 at 10:15 AM, Nurse A stated she was the one responsible for Treatment Cart #1. She stated she had not used the cart since she started the shift this morning. She stated it must have been left unlocked by the nurse from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to provide routine and emergency drugs and biologicals to its resident for one (Resident #1) of three Residents reviewed for pharmacy services MA-A failed to administer all of Resident #1's medications. This failure could place the resident at risk of not receiving the full effects intended by the physician. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's undated admission Record reflected he was an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia, depression, and diabetes. Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], reflected a BIMS score not calculated. His Functional Status reflected he required assistance with all of his ADLs. Record review of Resident #1's care plan, dated 5/9/24, reflected he had impaired cognitive function related to Alzheimer's and has depression and takes Fluoxetine for it. Observation on 7/30/24 at 10:30 AM a pink and turquoise pill was found on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one (Resident #2) of 6 residents reviewed for infection control CNA-B and CNA-C failed to wear appropriate PPE when providing care for Resident #2 who was on EBP. This failure placed the residents at risk of exposure to possible infectious agents. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's undated admission Record reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included brain damage cause d by a lack of oxygen, cardiac arrest, and blood clot in the lungs. Record review of Resident #2's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], reflected a BIMS score not calculated. Her Functional Status reflected she was totally dependent on staff for all of her ADLs. Record review of Resident #2's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-08 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public. These services are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for four resident rooms (resident #327, #73, #16 and #11) of 24 resident rooms reviewed for clean and sanitary environment. 1. Resident #327's room had two nails on the floor, a plastic cup and the floor was dirty. 2. Resident #73's room had a hole behind the door at the entrance to the room. 3. Resident #16's room had broken blinds, a stain on the wall by the bathroom, and the toilet was running causing the pipes to make a loud whining noise. 4. Resident #11's room had broken blinds and a hole behind the door at the entrance to the room. These failures could affect all residents, staff, and the public by placing them at risk of not having a clean, sanitary, and comfortable environment. Findings included: 1. Observation of Resident #372's room on 2/6/24 at 9:58 a.m. showed two iron nails…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary services for residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 1 (Resident #327) of 5 residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to ensure Resident #327 had her fingernails cleaned and trimmed and was provided incontinent care for more than 4 hours on 2/7/24. This failure could place residents who were dependent on staff for ADL care at risk for loss of dignity, risk for infections and a decreased quality of life. Findings include: Review of Resident #327's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #327 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses included hypertension (high blood pressure), peripheral vascular disease (circulation disorder caused by narrowing in a blood vessel), septicemia (blood poisoning by bacteria), and hyperlipidemia (high blood lipid levels). Resident #327 had a BIMS of 14…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility's kitchen, reviewed for kitchen sanitation. The facility failed to ensure liquid Kool Aid stored in the facility's walk-in refrigerator was covered, labelled and dated. These failures could place residents at risk for cross contamination and other air-borne illnesses. Findings included: Observation on 01/06/2024 from 9:14 AM in the facility's kitchen revealed: 1. One jar pink liquid Kool Aid in the walk-in refrigerator was not covered, labelled, and dated. 2. One jar yellow liquid Kool Aid in the walk-in refrigerator was not labelled and dated. An interview with the Dietary Manager on 02/06/2024 at 11:39 AM, she stated her expectation of the kitchen staff was to keep the liquid Kool Aid in the refrigerator to be covered, labelled and dated. The liquid Kool Aid which was not covered was considered unsanitary, bugs could fall into the drink, and it had the potential to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area for one (Resident #57) of 6 residents reviewed for resident call system The facility failed to ensure the call light in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] used by Resident #57 for dialysis treatment went to a centralized staff work area. This failure placed resident at risk of a delay in receiving assistance from facility staff and being unable to obtain assistance in the event of an emergency. Findings included: Review of Resident #57's MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #57 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of acute osteomyelitis (bone infection) of left ankle/foot, end stage renal disease, diabetes, stroke, hemiplegia and hemiparesis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-08 · tag F0555 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to choose his or her attending physician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to honor the resident right to choose his or her attending physician for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for resident rights. The facility did not honor Resident #1's right to choose his primary care physician as his attending physician. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of decreased quality care and treatment due to their lack of free choice for their attending physician care while in the facility. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, revealed a [AGE] year-old male, who admitted to the facility on [DATE] from a short-term (acute) hospital with the following diagnoses: Acute on Chronic Systolic CHF (history of relatively stable HF, with a new diagnosis or active symptoms); CKD, Stage 3 (kidneys have mild to moderate damage); and T2DM. Record review of Resident #1's Comprehensive MDS admission assessment, dated 11/14/23, revealed Resident #1 had a BIMS of 11 which suggested moderately impaired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-08 · tag F0774 — isolatedHelp the resident with transportation to and from laboratory services outside of the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assist the resident in making transportation arrangements to and from the source of service, if the resident needs assistance for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for transportation services, in that The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was provided transportation to services from outside entities on 12/07/23 and 12/15/23. This failure could result in missed appointments and delayed treatments. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, revealed a [AGE] year-old male, who admitted to the facility on [DATE] from a short-term (acute) hospital with the following diagnoses: Acute on Chronic Systolic CHF (history of relatively stable HF, with a new diagnosis or active symptoms); CKD, Stage 3 (kidneys have mild to moderate damage); and T2DM. Record review of Resident #1's Comprehensive MDS admission assessment, dated 11/14/23, revealed Resident #1 had a BIMS of 11 which suggested moderately impaired cognition. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments and permit only authorized personnel to have access for one (Medication Cart #1) of three medication carts reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure Medication Cart #1 was locked when unattended. This failure could place residents at risk of having access to unauthorized medications and/or lead to possible harm or drug diversion. Findings included: In an observation on 12/22/23 at 8:44 AM, revealed Medication Cart #1 was unlocked and unattended with no staff within eyesight of the medication cart for at least three minutes. All drawers could be opened, and all medications could easily be assessed. There was one resident observed in the immediate area. In an interview on 12/22/23 at 8:47 AM, PRN RN stated she wheeled a resident to the smoking area, because the resident was ready for a smoke break. PRN RN stated she did not realize she left the medication cart unlocked while unattended. She stated the risk of the unlocked medication cart…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-30 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident/RP has the right to be informed of, and participate in, his or her treatment for one (Resident #1) of 22 residents reviewed for resident and RP rights. Resident #1's RP was not notified when the physician's order for glucose monitoring was entered as once-a-week monitoring the day after Resident #1 admitted to the facility. Prior to admitting to the facility, Resident's glucose was monitored twice daily. Resident #1's RP was not educated on the risks or benefits of testing glucose less frequently to make an informed consent to the change. The resident was hospitalized for 10 days with increased confusion, poor wound healing, hyperglycemia (high blood sugar), and septicemia (bacterial infection of the blood). This failure could place residents at risk for delayed interventions in treatment when glucose levels spike or drop due to underlining conditions e.g., sepsis, chronic kidney disease, infections, cancer, and diabetes. Findings…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-30 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medications errors for one resident (Resident #1) of 22 residents reviewed for medication accuracy in that: The facility failed to hold antibiotic medication (Amoxicillin/Clavulanate) after orders were attached to Resident #1's hospital discharge documents until after 3 doses were administered 10/01/2023 to 10/02/2023. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was not administered medications that belonged to another resident that was a hospital patient. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving medications not ordered by their physician, which could cause exacerbate kidney disease, diarrhea, and nausea. Findings included: Record review of hospital notes, MDS, care plan and orders on 10/27/2023 at 9:30 AM for Resident #1 revealed, Resident #1 is an [AGE] year-old female with a medical history of dementia, cognitive communication deficits, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, chronic kidneys disease and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to immediately notify the resident's representative when there was a significant change in the physical status and consult with the resident physician for one of three residents (Resident #2) reviewed for notification of change in condition. LVN failed to notify Resident #2's resident representative of the significant change of condition of pain, notify the physician, and request for x-ray of the right knee on 10/08/23. This failure could place residents at risk for a delay in treatment and not receiving proper care due to failure to notify resident representative. Findings included: Review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 10/10/23 reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia, hypertension, difficulty in walking and age related physical debility. Review of Resident #2's care plan undated reflected Resident #2 had Condyle (A condyle is the round prominence at the end of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that alleged violations involving neglect were reported immediately but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made if the event that caused the allegation resulted in serious bodily injury for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for neglect. The Administrator failed to immediately report to HHSC within two hours after Resident #1 fell from a Hoyer lift during a transfer, which resulted in the resident sustaining a laceration to head requiring six staples at the hospital. This failure placed residents at risk of injury or worsening of their conditions. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-entered on 08/20/23. Her diagnoses included Spastic Quadriplegic cerebral Palsy, muscle weakness, unspecified lack of coordination , need for assistance with personal care, Flexion Deformity, right elbow, age-related Osteoporosis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$221,389 in federal fines across 6 penalties.
- $12,425 — penalty dated 2025-10-01
- $71,179 — penalty dated 2025-10-01
- $17,345 — penalty dated 2025-07-23
- $62,762 — penalty dated 2025-03-24
- $7,901 — penalty dated 2023-10-19
- $49,777 — penalty dated 2023-10-19
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 3.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.8 | -1.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.7 | -1.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 341 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 341; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STEPHENS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL DISTRICT | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 10/01/2021 |
| BIGHAM, GENE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2023 |
| ROLAND, BRIAN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2021 |
| BURNAM, SOON | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 10/01/2021 |
| KEETCH, CHAD | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 03/01/2011 |
| SPEER, GENA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 03/27/2025 |
| THORNTREE HEALTHCARE, INC. | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2021 |
| ENSIGN SERVICES INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/08/2021 |
| SABRA HEALTH CARE REIT INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $719K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 455727. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.