No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Westpark Rehabilitation and Living

900 Westpark Way, Euless, TX 76040 · Government - Hospital district · 140 certified beds · (817) 545-4071 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0607) — most recent Feb 20252 immediate-jeopardy citations1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$26,186 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (32% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0607) — most recent Feb 2025
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (54) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $26,186 in federal fines (most recent 2025-02-19)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
493 Westpark Way · (817) 354-7500 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2700 Tibbets Dr · (817) 684-9464 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2200 Airport Fwy · (682) 738-3286 · Call to confirm hours
Park
West Park0.2 mi
600 Westpark Way · (817) 685-1650 · Typically dawn to dusk

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.7%15.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.9%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.3%2.4%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.0%3.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened15.2%14.0%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication21.7%18.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.5%3.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control14.0%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table6.0%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.5%1.5%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.5%88.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission27.7%25.7%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit4.1%12.3%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.372.171.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.582.061.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 40 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

43.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
60.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
1.16U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.41hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.53hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.21hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 60.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 98% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF43.7%CMS range 31.4–57.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.3%CMS range 8.5–18.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge60.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge56.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge48.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified91.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.031.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.52
RN hours/ resident / day
0.73
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.95
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.19
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.41
RN hoursweekends
31.8%
Total nursing turnover
23.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 140 beds and averages 115.2 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 25 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.19 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.95 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.84 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.34 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-06)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2024-11-21)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

54 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 41 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from abuse for 1 (Residents #7) of 6 residents reviewed for resident abuse. The facility failed to ensure Resident #7 was free from physical abuse from LVN B during an incident on 01/04/2025 that subsequently required surgery on 01/09/2025. A Past Non Compliance Immediate Jeopardy (PNC IJ) was identified and presented to the Administrator on 02/19/2025 at 11:37 AM. The noncompliance began on 01/04/2025 and ended on 01/06/2025. The facility corrected the noncompliance before the investigation began. These failures placed residents at risk for serious injuries, abuse, and serious harm. Findings Included: Review of Resident #7's Face Sheet, dated 02/18/2025 at 1:30 PM, revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included schizophrenia, generalized anxiety disorder, osteoporosis, opioid dependence, and anorexia. Review of Resident #7's Quarterly MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-08-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation for 1 of 11 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse and/or neglect. The facility failed to protect Resident #1, who was not verbal, from sexual abuse when a confidential interviewee provided video footage of the resident trying to cover her breasts and vaginal area with her hands while CNA A was undressing her and when CNA A had her hands between Resident #1's legs and moved her hand in a fast motion inside the vaginal area for eight (8) minutes and two seconds (.02) after changing her. An IJ was identified on 08/07/24. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 1:30 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 08/09/24, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of potential for more than minimal harm because all staff had not been trained on abuse and neglect. This failure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-08-09 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures that prohibit mistreatment, neglect, and abuse of residents, for 1 of 11 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to implement policy that prohibited abuse of Resident #1 was sexually abused when a confidential interviewee provided video footage of CNA A undressing Resident #1 as Resident #1used her crossed arms to cover her breast and CNA A inserted her hands between the legs of Resident #1, moved her hands in a fast motion inside the vaginal area for eight (8) minutes and 2 (.02) seconds after the resident's clothes were taken off. An IJ was identified on 08/07/24. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 1:30 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 08/09/24, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of potential for more than minimal harm because all staff had not been trained on abuse and neglect. This failure could…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents, who needed respiratory care, were provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 5 of 7 residents (Resident #7, #9,#11, #12 and #13) reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #7's Nasal cannula connected to the oxygen tank was properly stored on 04/01/26. The facility failed to ensure Resident #9's suction tip was properly stored on 04/01/26. The facility failed to ensure Resident #11's Nasal cannula connected to the oxygen concentrator was properly stored on 04/01/26. The facility failed to ensure Resident #12's Nasal cannula connected to the oxygen concentrator was properly stored on 04/01/26. The facility failed to ensure Resident #13's Oxygen humidified bottle was connected to the oxygen concentrator and dated on 04/01/26. These failures could place the residents at risk…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to, in accordance with State and Federal laws, store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature controls, and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys 3 of 7 residents (Residents #1, #7, and #10) reviewed for hazards. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 did not have a bottle of Lumify eye drop in her room on 04/01/26 The facility failed to ensure Resident #7 did not have a pack of Alka Seltzer and saline nose spray in his room on 04/01/26 The facility failed to ensure Resident #10 did not have a jar of Vicks Vapor rub in her room on 04/01/26 These failures could place the residents at risk of accidental overdose, misuse of medications, and possible adverse reactions.Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet, dated 04/01/26, revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis that include Limitation of activity due to disability,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #1 and #5) reviewed for dignity.CNA E was observed standing over Resident #1 feeding her while the resident was lying in bed.Resident #5 was observed lying in bed and her catheter bag could be observed hanging from her bed without a privacy bag.These deficient practices could place residents at risk of not feeling as if they were being treated with dignity, privacy, and respect.Findings include:Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet, dated 04/01/26, reflected she was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Relevant diagnosis included difficulty swallowing.Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 02/26/26, reflected a BIMS score of 00 (severe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights set forth that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for a resident for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1 ) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's care plan reflected an intervention which included assisted feeding. This failure could place residents at risk of their needs not being met. Findings include:Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet, dated 04/01/26, reflected she was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Relevant diagnosis included difficulty swallowing.Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 02/26/26, reflected a BIMS score of 00 (severe cognitive impairment). The resident had an active diagnosis of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents' environment remained free of accident hazards as was possible for 2 of 12 residents (Residents #6, and #8) reviewed for accident prevention. The facility failed to ensure Resident #6's fall mat was placed alongside her bed while she was lying in it on [DATE].The facility failed to ensure Resident #8 did not have a can of Lysol Spray in his room on [DATE].These failures could prevent residents from having an environment that was free from hazards. Findings include:Record review of Resident #6's Face Sheet, dated [DATE], reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Relevant diagnosis included fall history.Record review of Resident #6's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated [DATE], reflected a BIMS score of 6 (severe cognitive impairment). The resident had active diagnoses of lack of coordination and unsteadiness on feet.Record review of Resident #6's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated [DATE],…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-18 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident received services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs for 2 of (Resident #1 and Resident #2) 7 resident rooms reviewed for reasonable accommodations. The facility failed to ensure the call light was accessible to Resident #1 and Resident #2 when lying in bed. This failure could place residents at risk of being unable to have a means of directly contacting caregivers.Findings Included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 03/18/26, reflected an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included: cerebral infraction (a type of ischemic (blood clot block artery) stroke), type 2 diabetes mellitus (body resist insulin or fails to produce enough), vitamin deficiency (body lacking sufficient iron), pure hypercholesterolemia (genetic disorder with high bad cholesterol levels), vascular dementia (decline in thinking skills), mood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely for 11 of 20 resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, and #11) and 2 of 2 shower rooms observed for cleanliness. The facility failed to ensure Rooms #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, and #11 were thoroughly cleaned and sanitized. The facility failed to ensure two of two shower rooms were thoroughly cleaned and sanitized. This facility failure could place residents at risk of living in an unclean and unsanitary environment, leading to a decreased quality of life.Findings included: During an observation on 02/04/26 at 10:35 a.m. of room [ROOM NUMBER], reflected the room floor had built up dirt in the corners of the door frame and corners of the floor. Observation reflected the bathroom floor had thick dark substances in the corners…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents, who needed respiratory care, were provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for six (Residents #16, #26, #59, #85, #107, and #72) of sixteen residents reviewed for respiratory care.1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #16 's nasal cannula was stored properly when not in use on 02/04/2026.2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #26's breathing mask was properly stored when not in use on 02/04/2026. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #59's breathing mask was properly stored when not in use on 02/04/2026. 4. The facility failed to ensure Resident #85 's nasal cannula was stored properly when not in use on 02/04/2026.5. The facility failed to ensure Resident #107's nasal cannula was stored properly when not in use on 02/04/2026.6. The facility failed to ensure Resident #72's breathing mask…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-06 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors for one (Resident #51) of six residents reviewed for significant medication errors.The facility failed to ensure Resident #51's propranolol (blood pressure medication) was administered as ordered on 02/05/2026.This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving the therapeutic effect of their medications as ordered by the physician. Findings included:Review of Resident #51's Face sheet, dated 02/05/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who admitted on [DATE]. She was diagnosed with hypertension (elevated blood pressure). Resident #51 was on hospice care services. Record review of Resident #51's MDS Assessment, dated 01/06/2026, reflected severe cognitive impairment with a BIMS score of 00. The Comprehensive MDS Assessment indicated the resident had hypertension.Record review of Resident #51's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 01/19/2026, reflected the resident had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature controls, and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for ten (Resident #10, #18, #21, #31, #53, #73, #98, #102, #103, and #68) of twenty-eight residents reviewed for medication storage. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #10 did not have an anti-fungal cream on top of her bedside table on 02/04/2026.2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #102's zinc oxide was not left inside the resident's room on 02/04/2026.3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #103's zinc oxide was not left inside the resident's room on 02/04/2026.4. The facility failed to ensure Resident #21 did not have containers of zinc oxide on the resident's shelf on 02/04/2026.5. The facility failed to ensure Resident #73's zinc oxide was not left inside the resident's room on 02/04/2026.6. The facility failed to ensure Resident #18 did not have a bottle of nasal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 41 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility's for one of one kitchen reviewed for food and nutrition services. The Dietary Manager failed to wear a beard cover in the kitchen while prepared food was present.The facility failed to ensure dietary staff properly labeled and dated stored food received by vendors.The facility failed to ensure stored food in the freezer was concealed from air-borne contaminants.The facility failed to ensure the tea dispenser was covered. The facility failed to ensure the following were thoroughly cleaned and/or sanitized: ice machine and ice scoop in the kitchen, sugar and flour bins, the serving table, serving table had a sanitizer container (red bucket) for sanitization, the dining room ice dispenser, the dining room counter and sink, and the ice chest on the 300-hall.These failures could place residents at risk of exposure to food contamination and illness. Findings included:Observations on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for three (Residents #10, #150 and #60) of fifteen residents reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA K wore a gown while changing Resident #10's linen, who was on enhanced barrier precautions due to having a g-tube, on 02/03/2026. 2. The facility failed to ensure RN E wore a gown when disconnecting Resident #150's antibiotic via PICC line, who was on enhanced barrier protection, on 02/05/2026.3. The facility failed to ensure MA G removed her gloves and performed hand hygiene between checking Resident #60's blood pressure and using the laptop on her medication cart on 02/04/2026. These failures could place residents at risk of cross-contamination and development and spread of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-06 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public for two direct care staff (RN D and MA G) and one (Crash Cart) of four carts reviewed for other environmental conditions.1. The facility failed to ensure that the drawers of the crash cart was not easily opened when not in use on 02/05/2026.2. The facility failed to ensure that RN D did not leave a container of germicidal wipes on top of the treatment cart at the wander unit unattended on 02/05/2026. 3. The facility failed to ensure MA G did not leave a container of germicidal wipes on top of her cart unattended on 02/05/2026.These failures could prevent the residents from having an environment that was safe for the residents, staff, and public. Findings include:1. An observation on 02/05/2026 at 8:15 AM revealed a crash cart was parked at the entry of hall 100. The drawers of the crash cart was not secured and could easily be opened.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-06 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for one (Resident #6) of fourteen residents reviewed for reasonable accommodation of needs. The facility failed to ensure the call light system in Resident #6's room was in a position that was accessible to the resident on 02/04/2026.This failure could place the residents at risk of being unable to obtain assistance when needed and help in the event of an emergency.Findings included: Record review of Resident #6's Face Sheet, dated 02/04/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was diagnosed with cerebral palsy (affects body movement and muscle coordination due to brain injury or malformation). Record review of Resident #6's Comprehensive MDS Assessment (tool used to measure health status), dated 11/20/2025, reflected intact cognition with a BIMS (tool…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-06 · tag F0646 — isolated
    Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify the State Mental Health Authority to inform them of a significant change in mental condition for two (Residents #2 and #3) of eight residents reviewed for Preadmissions Screening and Annual Resident Review (PASRR).1. The facility failed to notify the SMHA to ensure Resident #2 received a new PASRR level 1 screening following identification of his diagnosis of major depressive disorder on 06/20/2017, delusional disorder on 04/15/2021, and dementia on 01/08/2023.2. The facility failed to notify the SMHA to ensure Resident #3 received a new PASRR level 1 screening following identification of his diagnoses of bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder on 11/14/2023.These failures could place the residents at risk of not receiving the care and services they need in the most appropriate setting, when a significant change in their status occurs.Findings included:1. Review of Resident #2's Face Sheet, dated 02/05/2026,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights set forth that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for a resident for 2 of 12 residents (Resident #22 and #36 ) reviewed for care plan. The facility failed to ensure Resident #22's care plan reflected a plan of care for the cancer lesion on her forehead. The facility failed to ensure Resident #36's Comprehensive Care Plan reflected the resident had a midline intravenous catheter for antibiotic administration.These failures could place residents at risk of their needs not being met. Findings included:Record review of Resident #22's Face Sheet, dated 02/05/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #22 had paralysis on the left side of her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #114) reviewed for ADL care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #114 received any scheduled showers for January 2026 and no indication of refusal. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene, skin integrity, or decreased self- esteem.Findings included: Record review of Resident #114's Face Sheet, dated 02/05/26, reflected a 48 -year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #114 had a diagnosis of morbid obesity. Record review of Resident #114's MDS Assessment, dated 11/25/25, reflected the resident's BIM (12) indicated a moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS Assessment reflected the resident had active diagnoses of morbid obesity and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents' environment remained free of accident hazards as was possible for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #114) reviewed for hazards. The facility failed to ensure Resident #114 did not have a bottle of rubbing alcohol in his room on 02/04/26.This failure could prevent the residents from having an environment that was free from hazards. Findings include:Record review of Resident #114's Face Sheet, dated 02/05/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #114 had a diagnosis of major depressive disorder. Record review of Resident #114's MDS Assessment, dated 11/25/25, reflected the resident's BIM (12) indicated a moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS Assessment reflected the resident had an active diagnosis of schizophrenia.In an observation on 02/04/2026 at 10:43 AM, Resident #114 was observed with a bottle of rubbing alcohol on his bedside table.During an interview on 02/04/26 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for two (Resident #16 and Resident #32) of sixteen residents and one (Nurse's Cart) of two carts reviewed for pharmaceutical services. 1. The facility failed to dispose of an over-the-counter gas relief dated 12/2025.2. The facility failed to dispose of Resident #16's expired Linzess capsules dated 12/2025.3. The facility failed to dispose of Resident #32's expired Clonidine tablets with discard after date of 04/30/2024.These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving the medication's full therapeutic benefits and possible adverse reactions when taken. Findings included:An observation of the nurse's cart on 02/06/2026 at 10:52 AM, revealed the following:-Linzess capsules for Resident #16 with an expiration date of 12/2025, -Clonidine tablets for Resident #32 with a discard after date of 04/30/2024, and -Gas Relief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-06 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow policies and procedures to ensure that each resident or the resident's representative had the opportunity to refuse immunization for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #33) reviewed for vaccinations. The facility failed to ensure Resident #33 did not receive the influenza vaccination on 10/17/25. This failure could place residents at risk of having an adverse reaction and suffering harm.Findings included: Record review of Resident #33's Face Sheet, dated 02/05/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted [DATE]. Resident #33 had diagnoses of dementia (cognitive decline) and anemia (low red blood cells). Record review of Resident #33's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 11/20/25, reflected the resident's BIM (3) indicated a severe cognitive impairment. The Quarterly MDS Assessment reflected the resident had active diagnosis of dementia. Record review of Resident #33's Immunization detail regarding the Influenza Vaccine, dated 10/17/25,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop a complete care plan that meets all of a resident's needs, with timeframes and actions that can be measured for one of three residents (Resident #2) reviewed for Care Plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's usage of a Nebulizer device was care planned. This failure could place the resident at risk of not receiving the necessary care and services required. Findings include: Record review of Resident #2's Face Sheet, dated 09/243/25, reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included quadriplegia (paralysis). Record review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 7/28/25, reflected he had a BIMS score of 14 (intact cognitive response). For ADL care, it reflected the resident required total assistance. Record Review of Resident #2's Physician Orders, dated 9/24/25, reflected Ipratropium -Albuterol Solution 0.5-2.3 MG/ML 3 ml inhale orally every 4 hours as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident is being watched and has assistance devices, when needed, to prevent accidents for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for accident prevention. The facility failed to ensure Residents #1 had physician orders for the scoop mattress on his bed. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's fall mat was properly positioned while he was in bed. These failures could prevent the resident from having an environment that was free and clear of accidents and hazards. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet, dated 09/24/25, reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included muscle weakness and unsteadiness on feet. Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 8/20/25, reflected he had a BIMS score of 00 (severe cognitive impairment). For ADL care, it reflected the resident required extensive assistance and an active diagnosis of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents, who needed respiratory care, were provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for one of three residents (Resident #2) reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's nebulizer mask was properly stored in a bag when not in use on 09/24/25. This failure could place the residents at risk for respiratory infection and not having their respiratory needs met. Findings include: Record review of Resident #2's Face Sheet, dated 09/24/25, reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included quadriplegia (paralysis). Record review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 7/28/25, reflected he had a BIMS score of 14 (intact cognitive response). For ADL care, it reflected the resident required total assistance. There was no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other residents for two of ten residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for reasonable accommodation of needs. 1. The facility failed to ensure the call light system in Resident #1's room was in a position that was accessible to the resident on 08/21/2025.2. The facility failed to ensure the call light system in Resident #2's room was in a position that was accessible to the resident on 08/21/2025.These failures could place residents at risk of being unable to obtain assistance when needed and help in the event of an emergency.Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet, dated 08/21/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored securely for one (treatment cart #1) of 1 treatment carts reviewed for storage of medications. The facility failed to ensure treatment cart #1 was locked while unattended. This failure could place residents at risk of having access to unauthorized medications and/or lead to possible harm or drug diversions. Findings included: An observation on 04/01/25 at 2:36 PM revealed, treatment cart #1 was unlocked and unattended. All drawers could be opened and supplies (bandages, gauze, scissors, etc) could be easily accessed. 1 resident in a wheelchair was observed within approximately 5 feet from the treatment cart. In an interview and observation on 04/01/25 at 2:40 PM, with DON revealed that treatment cart #1 was unlocked and all drawers were able to be opened with supplies easily accessible. The DON stated that staff member had just stepped away. The DON stated her expectation was when the treatment cart was not in use that the treatment cart was locked. The DON stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for two (Residents #1 and #2) of eight residents reviewed for medications and pharmacy services. 1. The facility failed to obtain hospital discharge orders and administer Resident #1's seizure medication after his admission to the facility on Friday-03/21/25, resulting in him missing the medication on the evening of 03/21/25 and the morning of 03/22/25. 2. The facility failed to administer Resident #2's long and short acting inhalers related to her COPD after her admission to the facility on Friday-03/21/25 and on Saturday 03/22/25, in accordance with the admission orders. The failure could place residents at risk for not receiving therapeutic dosages of their medications as ordered by the physician and a potential for decreased health status,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for two (Resident #3 and Resident #4) of ten residents reviewed for Reasonable Accommodation of Needs. The facility failed to ensure the call light system in Resident #3 and Resident #4's rooms were in a position that was accessible to the residents on 02/18/2025. This failure could place the residents at risk of being unable to obtain assistance when needed and help in the event of an emergency. Findings included: Resident #3 Record review of Resident #3's Face Sheet, dated 02/18/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was diagnosed with muscle weakness and unsteadiness on feet. Record review of Resident #3's Comprehensive MDS Assessment, dated 01/25/2025, reflected the resident had a severe impairment in cognition with a BIMS score of 00. The resident required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was incontinent of bladder received services and assistance to prevent urinary tract infections for one (Resident #2) of one resident reviewed for Urinary Incontinence. The facility failed to prevent Resident #2's indwelling urinary Foley catheter (device that drains urine from the urinary bladder) device from contact with the floor on 02/18/2025. This failure could place the resident with indwelling urinary catheter devices at risk for the development of urinary tract infections. Findings included: Review of Resident #2's Face Sheet, dated 02/18/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was diagnosed with neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (the muscles and nerves that control the bladder do not work properly due to illness). Review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 12/18/2024, reflected the was unable to complete the interview to determine the BIMS score. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview,' and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents, who needed respiratory care, were provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for Respiratory Care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's face mask for his nebulizer was properly stored when not in use on 02/18/2025. This failure could place residents at risk for respiratory infection and not having their respiratory needs met. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet, dated 02/18/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs). Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 02/07/2025, reflected the resident was unable to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one (Resident #5) of ten residents reviewed for Infection Control. The facility failed to ensure CNA G and COTA G changed their gloves and performed hand hygiene while providing incontinent care to Resident #5 on 02/18/2025. These failures could place residents at risk of cross-contamination and development of infections. Findings included: Record review of Resident #5's Face sheet, dated 02/18/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was diagnosed with cerebral palsy (a disorder that affects movement and muscle tone due to brain injury). Record review of Resident #5's Comprehensive MDS Assessment, dated 01/25/2025, reflected the resident was unable to complete…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for one (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for Dignity. The facility failed to treat Resident #1 with dignity and promote enhancement of her quality of life when the resident was not provided a privacy bag for her catheter bag. This failure placed residents at risk of not having their right to a dignified existence maintained and a decline in their quality of life. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's Face Sheet, dated 12/28/2024, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. The resident was diagnosed with obstructive and reflux uropathy (a blockage in the urinary flow causing the urine to flow back to the kidneys). Review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 11/08/2024, reflected the resident was unable to complete the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely for 7 (room [ROOM NUMBER], #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, and #7) of 10 resident rooms and the hallway floors reviewed for cleanliness and sanitization. The facility failed to ensure that Resident room [ROOM NUMBER], #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, and #7 were thoroughly cleaned and sanitized. The facility failed to ensure that the facility hallway floors were cleaned. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of living in an unclean and unsanitary environment which could lead to a decreased quality of life. Findings included: An observation on 11/19/24 at 11:14 AM of the facility hallways revealed thick dirt and some reddish stains along the borders of the floor. An observation on 11/19/24 at 11:16 AM of Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] reflected the air condition unit had vents filled with black dirt…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents, who needed respiratory care, were provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 3 of twelve residents (Resident #35, Resident #55 and Resident #45) reviewed for Respiratory Care. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #35's nasal cannula for her oxygen concentrator was properly stored. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #55's face mask for his nebulizer was properly stored when not in use. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #45's nasal cannula (flexible tube used to deliver oxygen to the nose through two prongs) at the back of the wheelchair was properly stored. These failures could place residents at risk for respiratory infection and not having their respiratory needs met. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #35's face sheet, dated 11/21/2024, reflected an [AGE] year-old…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility's only kitchen, reviewed for food storage, labeling, dating, and kitchen sanitation. 1. The facility failed to ensure the ice chest, located on the 400-hall, was cleaned. 2. The facility failed to ensure the food stored in the refrigerator and freezer were labeled with the stored date. 3. The facility failed to ensure that the sugar and flour bins were cleaned. 4. The facility failed to ensure the ice scoop in the facility kitchen was cleaned. 5. The facility failed to ensure the kitchen cooking equipment was cleaned. 6. The facility failed to ensure the tea dispenser had the top placed back once the tea had brewed. These failures could place residents at risk for cross contamination and other air-borne illnesses. Findings included: Observations on 11/19/24 from 9:01 AM to 9:13 AM in the facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for two of eight residents (Resident #6 and Resident #41) reviewed for Infection Control. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA C changed her gloves and performed hand hygiene while providing incontinent care to Resident #6 on 11/19/2024. 2. The facility failed to ensure CNA B changed her gloves and performed hand hygiene while providing incontinent care to Resident #41 on 11/20/2024. 3. The facility failed to ensure CNA C would not place the pericare cleanser that would be used for incontinent care inside her pocket before using it on 11/19/2024. These failures could place residents at risk of cross-contamination and development of infections. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #6's face sheet, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for one (Resident #35) of sixteen residents reviewed for Reasonable Accommodation of Needs. The facility failed to ensure Resident #35 call light was answered within a reasonable time on 11/20/2024. This failure could place the residents at risk of being unable to obtain assistance when needed and help in the event of an emergency. Findings included: During a confidential group interview 6 of 6 residents stated it took the weekday staff 30 minutes-1 hour to respond to the call lights, and the weekend staff 1 hour or more to respond to the call lights. Record review of Resident #35 face sheet dated 11/21/2024 reflected an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: Dementia (condition characterized by loss of brain functions such as memory loss), chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide the right to personal privacy which includes accommodations during personal care for one (Resident #1) of fourteen residents reviewed for Privacy. The facility failed to ensure LVN A closed Resident #1's door while checking the resident's blood sugar and while administering insulin on 11/20/2024. This failure could place the residents at risk of not having their personal privacy maintained during medical treatment. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's Face Sheet, dated 11/21/2024, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Resident #1 was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (high blood sugar) and unspecified dementia (a condition characterized by loss of memory and ability to reason) with agitation. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 11/10/2024, reflected the resident scored 99 on her BIMS Summary Score denoting the resident was unable to complete the interview to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received an accurate assessment, reflective of the resident's status for one (Resident #45) of eight residents reviewed for Accuracy of Assessments. The facility failed to ensure Resident #45's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 11/10/2024, accurately reflected that Resident #45 was on oxygen therapy. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs, diminished function of health, and regressions in their overall health. Findings included: Review of Resident #45's Face Sheet, dated 11/21/2024, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. The resident was diagnosed with respiratory failure with hypoxia (insufficient amount of oxygen in the body). Review of Resident #45's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 11/10/2024, reflected the resident scored 99 on her BIMS Summary Score denoting the resident was unable to complete the interview to determine the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #66) reviewed for accident hazards. The facility failed to obtain physician orders or a physician assessment, as of 11/19/24, for Resident #66 for the usage of a scoop mattress prior to installing the mattress to assist in fall prevention. This failure could place residents at risk of accidents and hazards. Findings included: Record review of Resident #66's face sheet, dated 11/21/2024, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #66 had diagnoses which included seizures, syncope and collapse, and muscle weakness. Record review of Resident #66's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], reflected, he had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99. ADL care reflected transfers, toileting, and bathing and the resident was totally dependent for assistance.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who were incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infection and to restore continence to the extent possible for one of two residents (Resident #6) reviewed for Incontinent Care. The facility failed to ensure CNA C did not use the same wipes used to clean Resident #6's groin (junction between the central part of the body and the thighs) to clean the resident's front part on 11/19/2024. This failure could place residents at risk of cross-contamination and development of urinary tract infections. Findings include: Record review of Resident #6's face sheet, dated 11/21/2024, reflected the resident was an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #6 was diagnosed with dementia (a condition characterized by loss of memory and ability to reason) and muscle weakness. Record review of Resident #6's Comprehensive MDS Assessment, dated 08/19/2024,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was fed by enteral means received appropriate treatment and services to restore, if possible, oral eating skills and to prevent complications of enteral feeding which included but not limited to aspiration pneumonia, diarrhea, vomiting, dehydration, metabolic abnormalities, and nasal-pharyngeal ulcers for one of two resident (Resident #39) reviewed for feeding tube. 1. The facility failed to ensure LVN A used a new syringe during Resident #39's medication administration via g-tube (a tube inserted through the abdomen that delivers nutrition directly to the stomach) on 11/20/2024. 2. The facility failed to ensure LVN A put on Resident #39's abdominal binder on 11/20/2024 as per order. These failures could place residents at risk of infection and accidental pulling of the gastronomy tube. Findings include: Record review of Resident #39's face sheet, dated 11/21/2024, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure two staff performed incontinence care per the care plan for Resident #1. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving care consistent with their care plan. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's MDS quarterly assessment dated [DATE], reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. She was always incontinent of bladder and bowel. She required the extensive of two staff for incontinence care and bed mobility. Her cognitive status was unable to be determined. Her diagnoses included stroke. Review of Resident #1's Care Plan dated 07/17/20, reflected the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infection for one (Resident #1) of two residents observed for incontinence care. CNA A failed to perform hand hygiene and clean Resident #1's mattress during incontinence care. This failure could place residents at risk for infection during incontinence care. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's MDS quarterly assessment dated [DATE], reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. She was always incontinent of bladder and bowel. She required the extensive of two staff for incontinence care and bed mobility. Her cognitive status unable to be determined. Her diagnoses included stroke. Review of Resident #1's Care Plans reflected the following: -04/17/23 History of frequent urinary tract…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 4 of 10 residents (Residents # 37, #30, #21, #47) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to address Residents #37, #30, #21 and #47's elected code status on their comprehensive person-centered care plan. This failure could affect residents and could result in resident's needs not being met. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #37's face sheet, undated, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted [DATE] with a history that included pulmonary hypertension (a condition that affects the blood vessels in the lungs), hypertension (high blood pressure), pleural effusion (the accumulation of fluid in between the parietal and visceral pleura,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the facility's only kitchen. 1. The facility failed to ensure Dietary Aide G's hair restraint was worn properly and the Dietary Manager wore a beard restraint. 2. The facility failed to ensure stove top (range/griddle) and ovens were cleaned in accordance with professional standards. These failures could place all residents, who receive food from the kitchen, at risk for food contamination and food-borne illness. Findings included: Observation on 10/17/23 at 9:20 AM revealed Dietary Manager was not wearing a beard covering (restraint). Observation on 10/17/23 at 9:25 AM revealed Dietary Aide G, who was responsible for dishwashing, was not wearing a hairnet properly in place. Observation and interview on 10/17/23 at 9:28 AM revealed the stove, range, and ovens were layered in grease, food spills, and food particles. The Dietary Manager stated he had received a cleaner in the previous day and planned on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, which included procedures that assured accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident, for 1 of 16 residents (Resident #15) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed reorder the pain medication oxycodone in time causing Resident #15 to missed three doses on 10/17/23. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving the therapeutic benefits of the prescribed medications. Findings included: Review of Resident #15's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] reflected the resident was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, muscle weakness, fibromyalgia. The MDS further reflected the resident had clear speech, was understood and understood others. Review of Resident #15's care plan revised on 09/28/23 reflected the resident had complaints of pain related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure any drug regimen irregularities reported by the Pharmacist Consultant were acted upon, for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for unnecessary medications, psychotropic medications, and medication regimen review. The facility's Pharmacist Consultant recommended Resident #15's Lexapro 10 mg be discontinued. The physician agreed but the medication continued to be administered to the resident. This failure could place residents on psychoactive medications at risk for possible adverse side effects, adverse consequences, and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Review of Resident #11's MDS dated [DATE] reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included cerebrovascular accident, non-Alzheimer's dementia, depression, bipolar disorder, and psychotic disorder. Review of Resident #11's care plan revised on 03/28/23 reflected the resident had potential for mood problem related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one of three residents (Resident #27) reviewed for infection control, in that: 1. RN A failed to perform hand hygiene prior to entering room [ROOM NUMBER] to obtain blood pressure. 2. RN A failed to clean the blood pressure wrist cuff after checking vitals of Resident #27 and then placing the contaminated wrist cuff in the top drawer of the medication cart. 3. RN A prepared medications for Resident #27 by placing the medications in small dose cups and transported the dose cups by pinching the side of the dose cup using a forefinger inserted into dose cup and thumb on the outside of the dose cup. Failure to follow Infection Control policy placed residents at risk of infection/illness. Findings included: Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals, to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 2 Medication Carts (400 Hall Medication Cart) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure 400 Hall Medication Cart did not include medication for a deceased resident, Resident #1. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the correct medication, adverse reactions to medications, and worsening of symptoms of diseases. Findings Include: An observation on [DATE] at 7:52 AM, revealed there was medication on the 400 Hall Medication Cart for Resident #1. Record review of Resident #1's electronic record revealed the resident passed away on [DATE]. The status noted on her electronic record was, discharged . Record review of a progress note dated [DATE], on Resident #1's electronic record stated the following:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with State and Federal laws, all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for one of three (400 Hall Medication Cart) treatment carts reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to ensure the 400 Hall Medication Cart was locked when unattended. This failure could place residents at risk of having access to unauthorized medications and/or lead to possible harm or drug diversion. Findings include: In an observation and interview on 09/26/23 at 7:48 AM, the 400 Hall Medication Cart was unlocked with the keys sitting on top of the cart. The medication cart was unattended and there were no staff in the immediate area. The medication cart was near the main entrance, so there were several staff and residents observed in close proximity to the medication cart. RN A entered the hallway from a resident's room across the hallway from where the medication cart stood. RN A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-01 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to coordinate an assessment with the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review program (PASRR) under Medicaid to the maximum extent practicable to avoid duplicative testing and effort for one (Resident #1) of one resident reviewed for PASRR services. The facility failed to submit Resident #1's PASRR Comprehensive Service Plan (PCSP) form in the LTC Online Portal for Resident #1 by the specific deadline. This failure could place residents with a positive PASRR evaluation at risk of not receiving specialized PASRR services which could contribute to a decline in physical, mental, psychosocial well-being and quality of life. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 09/01/23, reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included dementia, moderate intellectual disabilities, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of Resident #1's care plan, undated, reflected she was PASRR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$26,186 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $16,801 — penalty dated 2025-02-19
  • $9,385 — penalty dated 2024-08-09

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 53.2-2.2 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.8-1.8 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.7+0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 341 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Aspen Health And WellnessOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Bennett Hills Rehabilitation and Care CenterGooding, ID 1 of 5Broadway By The SeaLong Beach, CA 1 of 5Chatsworth Park Health Care CenterChatsworth, CA 1 of 5Clarion Wellness and Rehabilitation CenterClarion, IA 1 of 5Colonial Manor of RandolphRandolph, NE 1 of 5Durango Health And RehabilitationDurango, CO 1 of 5Fort Dodge Health and RehabilitationFort Dodge, IA 1 of 5Greater Southside Health and RehabilitationDes Moines, IA 1 of 5Hearthstone Health And RehabilitationSparks, NV 1 of 5Heritage Gardens Rehabilitation and HealthcareCarrollton, TX 1 of 5Hillcrest Health Care CenterHawarden, IA 1 of 5Lake Village Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterLewisville, TX 1 of 5Lakeside Rehabilitation and Care CenterCoeur d'Alene, ID 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare And Rehabilitation - NorthAustin, TX 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare And Rehabilitation - WaxahaWaxahachie, TX 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare and Rehabilitation - Fort WKeller, TX 1 of 5Madera Post Acute CenterEl Monte, CA 1 of 5Medallion Post Acute RehabilitationColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Mesquite Post Acute CareLubbock, TX 1 of 5Millbrook Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterLancaster, TX 1 of 5Misty Willow Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterHouston, TX 1 of 5New Orange HillsOrange, CA 1 of 5Northeast Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Northgate PlazaIrving, TX 1 of 5Oak View Health And RehabilitationConway, SC 1 of 5Oakwood Care And RehabilitationLakewood, CO 1 of 5Omaha Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterOmaha, NE 1 of 5Onion Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterAustin, TX 1 of 5Park Manor Bee CaveBee Cave, TX 1 of 5Pelican Pointe Health And Rehabilitation CenterWindsor, CO 1 of 5Premier Care Center For Palm SpringsPalm Springs, CA 1 of 5Provo Rehabilitation and NursingProvo, UT 1 of 5Rock Canyon Respiratory And Rehabilitation CenterPueblo, CO 1 of 5Rosewood Rehabilitation CenterReno, NV 1 of 5San Marcos Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterSan Marcos, TX 1 of 5Sonterra Health CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5SouthlandNorwalk, CA 1 of 5Southland Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterLufkin, TX 1 of 5Spencer Post Acute Rehabilitation CenterSpencer, IA

Showing 40 of 341; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
EASTLAND MEMORIAL HOSPITAL DISTRICTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 04/01/2017
BIGMON, LUKEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/08/2024
KAZIGO, NAKIZITOIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/16/2023
BURNAM, SOONIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 05/01/2016
KEETCH, CHADIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/01/2011
TAYLOR, STEPHENIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/01/2025
TREE CITY HEALTHCARE, INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2017
ENSIGN SERVICES INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2016
NATIONAL HEALTH INVESTORS, INC.OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2016
TEXAS NHI INVESTORS, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2016

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-3.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$854K
Related-party expense9% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 75%Medicare 5%Other / private 21%

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $854K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$342per resident / day
operating cost
$10,408per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$330per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 676029. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next