Legend Oaks Healthcare and Rehabilitation-Kyle

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 202 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 56.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 96 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.93 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 96% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 126 beds and averages 115.9 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.38 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.06 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.74 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.64 on weekdays — 25% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-12-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice to promote wound healing and to prevent new pressure ulcers from developing for one (Resident #90) of five residents reviewed for pressure injuries. The facility failed to ensure Resident #90 received wound care treatments for eight days after admission, from 11/26/2025 to 12/04/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of improper wound management, the development of new pressure injuries, deterioration in existing pressure injuries, infection, and pain.Findings included: Record review of Resident #90's undated face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included end stage renal disease (a life-threatening disease in which the kidneys no longer filter the blood), diabetes mellitus II (a problem producing the hormone insulin to metabolize carbohydrates), and congestive heart failure (a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents, who needed respiratory care, were provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 3 of 5 residents (Resident#1, Resident #2 and Resident#3) reviewed for respiratory care.The facility failed to ensure the humidifier water bottle and oxygen cannula connected to the oxygen concentrator of Resident#1, Resident #2 and Resident #3 were changed every Sunday as ordered by the physician.This failure could place residents at risk for respiratory infections through contamination.Findings included:Resident #1Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 05/26/26 reflected Resident #1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. She was an [AGE] year-old female diagnosed with multiple fractures of ribs, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia(low oxygen level), and chronic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the medical records were in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, the facility must maintain medical records on each resident that are complete, accurately documented, readily accessible; and systematically organized for 3 of 5 residents (Resident#1,Resident #2 and Resident#3) reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure LPN A not documenting the of changing of water bottle and oxygen cannula connected to the oxygen concentrator of Resident#1, Resident #2 and Resident #3 as completed on 05/24/26, on MARs, when it was not completed on that day, as ordered by the physician.This failure placed residents at risk for respiratory infections through contamination.Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 05/26/26 reflected Resident #1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. She was an [AGE] year-old female diagnosed withmultiple…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 3 of 4 residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) reviewed for homelike environment. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's, Resident #2's and Resident #3's privacy curtains were free of stains. This failure could place residents at risk of living in an unclean or unsanitary environment, decreased quality of life, or shame. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 01/29/2026 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of other cerebral infarction due to occlusion or stenosis of small artery (type of stroke caused by blockage or narrowing in deep-brain arteries), and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction (motor impairments affecting one side of body following a stroke). Review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] reflected a BIMS score of 12 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be informed of, and participate in, his or her treatment which included, the right to be informed in advance, by the physician or other practitioner or other professional, of the risks and benefits of proposed care, treatment and treatment alternatives or treatment options to choose the alternative or option he or she preferred for one of (Resident #1) of four residents review for medication changes. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was made aware that he was prescribed oseltamivir phosphate (for influenza A prophylaxis) on 01/20/2026. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving medications without their prior knowledge or consent, being unaware of the benefits and risks of the medications prescribed and place residents at risk of diminishing their right to autonomy.Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 01/29/2026 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food safety. 1. The deep fryer was dirty on 12/09/2025.2. The commercial dishwasher did not meet the minimum required threshold for chemical sanitizing on 12/09/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of food-borne illnesses.Findings included: 1. Observation on 12/09/2025 at 9:03 a.m. revealed the deep fryer in the facility kitchen was covered in cornmeal breading crumbs. There were crumbs on the rim of the fryer as well as floating in the oil inside the fryer. There were streaks of dark brown substances on the inside walls of the fryer, and the fry baskets contained crumbs and other solid matter inside the basket and embedded in the basket wires. During an interview on 12/09/2025 at 9:05 AM, the DS stated the deep fryer was deep cleaned weekly and food particles from use were cleaned daily after each meal. He…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-12 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to conduct an accurate assessment of each resident's functional capacity for 1 of 24 residents (Resident #90) reviewed for comprehensive assessments. The facility failed to ensure Resident #90's pressure wound, present on admission, was included in the admission MDS assessment. This failure placed residents at risk of wound deterioration.Findings included: Review of Resident #90's undated face sheet reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included end stage renal disease (a life-threatening disease in which the kidneys no longer filter the blood), diabetes mellitus II (a problem producing the hormone insulin to metabolize carbohydrates), and congestive heart failure (a condition in which the heart cannot pump blood effectively, leading to fluid accumulation in the lungs and legs). Review of Resident #90's admission MDS assessment, dated 11/29/2025, reflected a BIMS score of 15, indicating…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 (Resident #2, Resident #5) of 10 residents reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to properly use EBP personal protective equipment during perineal care for Resident #2 and Resident #5. This failure could place residents at risk for infection transmission, sepsis, and hospitalization. Findings included:Record review of Resident 5's face sheet, dated 12/10/2025, revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included AC, BPH, anemia, glaucoma, recurrent falls, and persistent pain in both hips.Review of Resident 5's physician orders dated 12/01/2025, revealed that this resident was on contact precautions for wounds, indwelling medical devices, infection, and/or MDRO status (indwelling). Review of Resident 5's physician orders dated 12/06/2025, revealed that PPE was required for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection and prevention control program that included, at a minimum, a system for preventing and controlling infections for 2 of 4 residents (Residents #3 and Resident #4) reviewed for infection control, as indicated by: MA A did not clean and disinfect the blood pressure monitor while using it on Resident #3 and Resident #4 and failed to keep away opened personal drinks from the med cart , on 11/20/24 at 10:25am . This failure could place the residents at risk of transmission of disease and infection. Findings included: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet on 11/20/24 revealed an [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses were, Orthostatic hypotension, Type 2 diabetes, Hypertension, Lack of coordination, Muscle weakness, Dementia and Cognitive communication deficit. Record review on 11/20/24 of Resident #3's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 09/19/24 revealed a BIMS of 06 indicating his…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed on 11/07/24 to protect Resident #1 from physical and emotional abuse by Resident #2. Resident #2 screamed at Resident #1 and grabbed her right arm with the history of nondisplaced fracture of triquetrum [cuneiform] bone of the wrist, caused erythema (redness of skin) that lasted for 4 days. This failure could place residents at risk of serious physical and emotional injury and harm. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet on 11/20/24 revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were, Wedge compression fracture of second lumbar vertebra (back bone at lumbar area), Maxillary (upper jaw) fracture, Fracture of tooth, Repeated falls, Alzheimer's disease, Nondisplaced fracture of triquetrum bone (bone on the wrist), right wrist, Insomnia, Hypertension, Muscle…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to a dignified existence for 2 of 8 residents (Residents #34 and #67) reviewed for dignity. The facility failed to ensure Resident #34 was wearing clean clothing throughout the day on 09/04/24 and that Resident #67 was wearing clean clothing throughout the day on 09/03/24 and 09/04/24. This failure placed residents at risk of embarrassment and a loss of dignity. Findings included: 1. Review of the undated face sheet for Resident #34 reflected an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included dementia, lack of coordination, abnormal posture, traumatic subdural hemorrhage with loss of consciousness, muscle weakness, malaise, cognitive communication deficit, need for assistance with personal care. Review of the quarterly MDS for Resident #34 dated 05/29/24 reflected a BIMS score of 99, indicating she was unable to complete the interview. Review of the section on functional…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,407 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,407 — penalty dated 2025-12-12

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX