Kirkwood Manor
2590 Loop 337 N, New Braunfels, TX 78130 · For profit - Corporation · 162 certified beds · (830) 620-0509 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (51) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $29,026 in federal fines (most recent 2024-03-24)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 39.7% | 15.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.3% | 3.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 5.9% | 2.4% | 6.5% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.4% | 0.0% | 0.1% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.0% | 3.3% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 33.9% | 14.0% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 11.2% | 18.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.8% | 3.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.8% | 13.4% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 5.6% | 9.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.2% | 88.0% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 28.7% | 25.7% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.0% | 12.3% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.05 | 2.17 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.03 | 2.06 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
54.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 85 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 59.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 71 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 98% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 54.3%CMS range 45.2–63.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.5%CMS range 7.7–13.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 59.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 54.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 57.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 93.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 96.7% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 96.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.1%CMS range 3.8–11.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.31 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 162 beds and averages 138.2 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.17 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.96 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.78 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.33 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
51 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-03-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to, based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for quality of care . 1. The facility staff administered Resident #1's digoxin (medication used to manage and treat heart failure and certain abnormal heart rhythms) without documenting the ordered blood pressure and pulse per the physician ordered parameters from [DATE] to [DATE], [DATE] to [DATE], and [DATE] to [DATE] (23 days) and failed to hold the medication as ordered per parameters on [DATE] and [DATE] . 2. The facility staff failed to administer Resident #1's midodrine (medication used to raise abnormally low blood pressure) as ordered to be given PRN every 8 hours for SBP<100 on [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], and [DATE] (5 instances) when the resident's SBP was below 100 . 3.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and physician's orders for one (1) of five (5) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to complete Resident #1's venous stasis prevention (preventing the congestion and slowing of circulation in the veins due to blockage) and wound care prevention per physician orders. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving necessary medical care, harm, and hospitalization.The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet, dated 06/16/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old male. He was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #1's Medical Diagnosis tab, undated and accessed 06/16/2026 at 04:21 p.m., reflected diagnoses included hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that were complete and accurately documented for one (1) of five (5) residents (Residents #1) reviewed for accurate medical records. The facility failed to ensure nursing staff documented the exceptions to the venous stasis prevention (preventing the congestion and slowing of circulation in the veins due to blockage) and wound care prevention orders for Resident #1. These failures could place residents at risk of not recording a proper account of medical interventions, treatments, and outcomes during a residents' stay.The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet, dated 06/16/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old male. He was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #1's Medical Diagnosis tab, undated and accessed 06/16/2026 at 04:21 p.m., reflected diagnoses included hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-10 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the MDS assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 4 residents (Residents #10, #13, #81 and #106) of 24 residents reviewed for MDS assessments. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #10 was coded Yes on her Quarterly MDS assessment, signed as completed on 01/14/2026, for Did the resident have a fall anytime in the last 2-6 months prior to admission/entry or reentry? because the resident had fall incident on 01/05/2026. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #13 and Resident #81's annual MDS was coded accurately for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR). 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #106's Annual MDS was coded accurately for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR). These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving needed care and could result in missed or inappropriate care. The findings included: 2. Record review of Resident #13's face sheet dated 4/8/26 revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1 (Resident #56) of 27 residents reviewed for dignity. The facility failed to ensure CNA-A did not stand next to Resident #56 while assisting the resident to eat during lunchtime on 04/07/2026. These failures could place the residents at risk of not having their right to a dignified existence maintained. Findings included: Record review of Resident #56's Face Sheet, dated 04/10/2026, reflected the resident was an [AGE] year-old female and originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of dementia (loss of memory and thinking ability), muscle wasting and atrophy (loss of skeletal muscle mass), and extrapyramidal and movement disorder (movement disorders that can develop as side effects of antipsychotic medications and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment, and described services that were to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 27 residents (Resident #115) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #115's care plan reflected her bladder and bowel incontinence status and included a care plan regarding how to take care of the resident's bladder and bowel incontinence. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving proper care and services due to inaccurate care plans. The findings included:Record review of Resident #115's face sheet, dated 04/10/2026, revealed a [AGE] year-old female, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], and re-admitted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to review and revise Resident Care Plans after each assessment for 1 of 27 Residents (Resident #10) whose records were reviewed for care plan revision/timing, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #10's care plan was updated after IDT meeting when the resident had a fall and changes to intervention where put in place to prevent fall from one person assist for baths to two persons assist on 01/05/2026. This failure could place residents at risk and contribute to residents not receiving the care and services they needed. The findings included:Record review of Resident #10's face sheet, dated 04/10/2026, revealed an 84-years-old female, originally admitted on [DATE], and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of traumatic subdural hemorrhage (it is caused by a traumatic head injury, such as a blow to the head of a fall and bleeding inside the skull), dementia (loss of memory and thinking ability), and type 2 diabetes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment remains as free of accident hazards as possible for 1 (Resident #39) of 2 residents reviewed for transfers in that: The facility failed to engage brakes of the mechanical lift when slowly lowering Resident #39 onto the bed on 04/09/2026. This failure could place residents at risk for falls, injuries, and decline in health. Findings included:Record review of Resident #39's face sheet, dated on 04/10/2026, revealed the resident was a 73-years-old female and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of fracture of lower and right femur (fracture to right thigh bone), muscle wasting and atrophy (loss of skeletal muscle mass), and obesity (complex disease involving having too much body fat). Record review of Resident #39's admission MDS assessment, dated on 02/11/2026, revealed the resident's BIMS score was 15 out of 15 which indicated the resident's cognitive was intact and was dependent (Helper does…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with an indwelling catheter, received the appropriate care and services for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #43) and the facility failed to ensure a resident who is incontinent of bladder receives appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #108), reviewed for quality of care. 1. The facility failed to ensure resident #43's urinary drainage bag remained below the level of the bladder during catheter care on 4/9/26.2. When CNA-F and CNA-C were providing incontinent care to Resident #108 on 04/09/2026, CNA-F did not clean the resident's suprapubic area (the area of the abdomen located below the umbilical region) and did not separate the resident's labia area. These failures could place residents at risk of cross contamination, urinary tract infections and complications. The findings were: 1. Record review of Resident #43's face sheet dated 4/10/26 revealed the resident was a [AGE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who needed respiratory care were provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 2 (Resident #3 and Resident #137) of 3 residents. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's oxygen tubing attached to the AVAP machine was bagged when not in use on 04/07/2026 and 04/08/2026. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #137's oxygen concentrator was set to 3 liters per minute as ordered by the physician on 04/8/2026. This failure could place residents at risk of illness, and respiratory complications.Findings included:1. Record review of Resident #3's face sheet, dated 04/08/2026, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with an original admission date of 06/03/2025, with diagnoses which included: acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (sudden, severe worsening of baseline lung function in patients with chronic lung disease, resulting in critical oxygen deficiency), chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 (400-hall nursing cart) of 6 medication carts reviewed for medication storage and for 1 (Resident #134) of 10 residents reviewed for medication administration. 1. There was one bottle of blood glucose test strips inside the 400-hall nursing cart on [DATE], and the test strips expired on [DATE]. 2. The facility failed to reorder Resident #134's buspirone hydrochloride 7.5 MG Oral Table for depression on time. As a result, the medication was not available when administering the medication to the resident. This failure could place the residents at risk of not receiving therapeutic doses of their medication. Findings included:1. Observation on [DATE] at 3:01 p.m. revealed there was one bottle of blood glucose test strips inside the 400-hall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 40 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications and biologicals were stored in locked compartments for 1 of 2 medication rooms (Medication room station-2 for 100 and 500 hall) reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to ensure the narcotic box inside the refrigerator for medications in the medication room station-2 for 100 and 500 hall was permanently affixed to the refrigerator. This failure could place residents at risk of not having controlled medications as ordered due to diversion of medication. Findings included:Observation on 04/08/2026 at 2:02 p.m. revealed there was a refrigerator inside the medication room station-2 for 100 and 500 hall, and the refrigerator was for medications. Further observation revealed one narcotic box for controlled medications was inside the refrigerator, but the narcotic box was affixed to one of refrigerator shelves, and the shelf was not permanently affixed to the refrigerator, so anybody could remove freely the shelf that the narcotic box was affixed to. Inside the narcotic box, there was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen observed for plate preparation. The facility failed to ensure dietary staff properly air-dried insulated domes for tops of plates prior to meal service observed on 04/09/2026. These failures could place residents who received meals and/or snacks from the kitchen at risk of food born illness. The findings included: Observation on 04/09/2026 at 11:29 a.m. revealed Dietary Aide N placing plates on trays once they were prepared and covering them with insulated domes that had pooling water in them and as the Dietary Aide N would turn them over and place them on the plates of approximately 7 plates water would dribble across the plates. Dietary Aide N would then place the trays on the rack that were sent to 600 hall. Observation and interview on 04/09/2026 at 11:37 a.m. the Dietary Supervisor observed the insulated domes being placed on plates, that had not been dried properly and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0813 — isolatedHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement their policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors to ensure safe and sanitary storage, handling, and consumption, for 1 (Residents #1) of 27 residents reviewed, in that: Resident #1's personal refrigerator located in her room contained a small plastic container and some food wrapped with kitchen aluminum foil with no date and no label on 04/07/2026. The failure could place the residents at risk for food borne illness. The findings included:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 04/10/2026, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of pneumonia (infection that affects one or both lungs), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and muscle wasting and atrophy (decrease in muscle size and mass, which results in reduced muscle strength and function). Record review of Resident #1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medical records on each resident were complete, readily accessible, and contained the results of any preadmission screening and resident review evaluations and determinations conducted by the State for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #13, and #81), reviewed for Administration. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #13's PASARR level 1 screening, and PASARR level 2 evaluation were included in the resident's EHR. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #81's PASARR level 2 evaluation, and her specialized service plans were included in the resident's EHR. This failure could place residents at risk of a delay in or not receiving their needed care and specialized services, and decreased continuity of care.The findings were: 1. Record review of Resident #13's face sheet dated 4/8/26 revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #13's diagnoses included major depressive disorder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-31 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accurate administration of medications. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's mediation order of cloNIDine HCI (a medication used to treat blood pressure and/or heart rate) was entered as prescribed by a physician. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving their prescribed medications correctly and a decreased quality of life.The findings include: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 3/30/2026 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included essential (primary) hypertension (high blood pressure), heart failure, unspecified (heart is not pumping effectively), and unspecified atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rhythm). Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pharmacy services. LVN A administered Resident #1's insulin from a flex pen (Aspart) for diabetes at lunchtime to Resident #1, when it was not labeled with the resident's name. This failure could place residents at risk of inaccurate drug administration and not having appropriate therapeutic effects. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 06/03/2025, revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included: cerebral palsy (a group of neurological disorders that affect movement, balance and posture), type 2 diabetes mellitus (the most common form of diabetes characterized by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were labeled for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for medication labeling. 2. An insulin flex pen (Aspart) for diabetes had no resident's name labeled and was found on the 400-hall medication cart on 06/03/2024 and assumed by LVN A to belong to Resident #1. This failure could place residents at risk of use of the medication for more than one resident which could result in contamination of a blood borne pathogen. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 06/03/2025, revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included: cerebral palsy (a group of neurological disorders that affect movement, balance and posture), type 2 diabetes mellitus (the most common form of diabetes characterized by the body's inability to properly use insulin, leading to high sugar levels), mild intellectual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident received care and services safely and the physical layout of the facility maximized resident independence and did not pose a safety risk; provided maintenance services necessary to maintain an orderly, and comfortable interior; provide adequate and comfortable lighting levels in all areas; for 2 of 2 shower rooms (600 hall shower on E and W side), maintained shower free of saftery hazards for 1 of 2 Showers (600 Hall Shower), and 1 of 1 Resident's room (Resident #68) reviewed for safety hazards. 1. The water temperature in the 600 E shower room reached 95.5 degrees and the water temperature in the W shower room reached 97.1 degrees. The safe water temperature range should be 100 to 110 degrees. 2. There was a long hole on a wall around an electrical outlet beside Resident #68's bed. 3. There was broken tiles in the 600 E shower room for at least a couple of months. These failures could place residents at risk of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development of communicable diseases and infections for 3 residents (Residents #52, #109, and #27) of 29 residents and for 1 of 2 shower rooms (600 W hallway) reviewed for infection control practices. 1. LVN-C provided colostomy (opening for the colon through the belly) care for Resident #52 and failed to change her gloves without sanitizing or washing her hands. 2. LVN-A entered Resident #109's room, who was on EBP, on 02/19/2025 at 4:40 p.m. and failed to put on a gown when the LVN-A was administering medications to the resident via gastrostomy tube. 3. Medication Aide-I administered medications for high blood pressure to Resident #27, the Medication Aide-I used a blood pressure cuff of the monitor machine to take Resident #27's blood pressure without cleaning the cuff. 4. Nursing staff failed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure each PASRR Level 1 Screening done for each resident was correct for mental illness for 1 of 2 residents'(Resident #10) PASRRs reviewed, in that: Resident #10 had a PASRR Level 1 screening that did not indicate that she had a mental illness with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder and, the facility did not have Resident #10 screened again for possible services. This failure could cause the residents not to receive services needed to maintain the highest functional ability for their quality of life. The findings included: Record review of Resident # 10's face sheet dated 02/20/2025revealed an [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: CHF (congestive heart failure- a condition which the heart does not pump blood as well as it should), anxiety disorder, dementia, and bipolar disorder. Record review on of Resident # 10's Care Plan dated 11/06/2024 revealed Resident #10 was care planned for bipolar disorder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments person-centered care plan to reflect the current condition for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #110) reviewed for care plan revisions. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #110's care plan was revised to reflect order to release seatbelt and harness on wheelchair every 2 hours for 10 minutes. This deficient practice could place resident at risk of not receiving appropriate interventions to meet their current needs. The findings included: Record review of Resident #110's face sheet, dated 02/19/2025, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year old female who was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #110 had diagnostics of abnormal posture, unspecified intellectual disabilities, and cerebral palsy. Record review of Resident #110's MDS, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review revealed the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained was free of accident hazards as is possible in residents received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 6 Residents (Resident #187) observed for safety hazards. 1. Nursing staff failed to put down a floor mat used as a preventative device on the right side of Resident #187's bed. This deficient practices could affect any resident and could contribute to avoidable falls and accidents. The findings were: 1. Review of Resident #187's face sheet, dated 2/20/25, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including unspecified Dementia. Review of Resident #187's Care Plan, dated 2/15/25, revealed she was a fall risk and some of the interventions included bed in lowest position and floor mats at bedside. Review of Resident #187's Fall Risk Evaluation, dated 2/15/25, revealed she was a high risk for falling related to disoriented x 2 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bowel and bladder receives appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #70) reviewed for incontinence care. When CNA-D was providing incontinent care to Resident #70 on 02/20/2025, CNA-D did not separate the resident's labia and did not clean the base of her labia. Then, CNA-D turned the resident to her left side and started cleaning the resident's bowel movement. However, the CNA-D did not clean Resident #70's bowel movement completely. This failure could place residents who required incontinence care at risk for cross contamination and the development of new or worsening urinary tract infections. The findings included: Record review of Resident #70's face sheet, dated 02/18/2025, revealed a [AGE] year-old female and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care, is provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 2 of 4 (Resident #70 and #52) reviewed for respiratory care. 1. Resident #70's physician order indicated Changing oxygen tubing and humidifier bottle every night shift every Wednesday, but the resident's oxygen tubing labeled 02/03/2025 was not changed every week per the physician's order. 2. Resident #52's oxygen nasal cannular and mask for Bi-pap were not covered in a plastic bag when they were not used. This failure could affect residents with oxygen therapy and could lead them to lack of care including possible infection by not following the physician orders. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #70's face sheet, dated 02/18/2025, revealed a [AGE] year-old female and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included atherosclerotic heart disease of coronary artery without angina…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #32) reviewed for pharmacy services. Resident #32's insulin flex pen (Lispro) for diabetes had an open date of 01/10/2025 found inside the 300-hall nursing cart on 02/19/2025. It should have been discarded 28 days after opening. The failures could place residents at risk of inaccurate drug administration and not having appropriate therapeutic effects. The findings included: Record review of Resident #32's face sheet, dated 02/21/2025, revealed Resident #32 was a [AGE] year old female and admitted to the facility 04/11/2024 and re-admitted to the facility 12/26/2024 with diagnoses of anemia (the blood does not have enough healthy red blood cells and hemoglobin), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of lung…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments for 1 of 3 medication carts (400-hall medication aide cart) and 1 of 4 residents (Resident #83) reviewed for storage. 1. The facility failed to ensure the 400-hall medication aide cart was locked when left unattended during passing medications. 2. Resident #83's insulin flex pen (NovoLog) for diabetes had no open date, found inside 200-hall nursing cart on 02/19/2025. Per facility policy the opened and undated insulin should have been discarded. This failure could place residents at risk of misappropriation of medications or harm due to accidental ingestion of unprescribed mediations. The findings were: 1. Observation on 02/19/2025 at 12:09 p.m. revealed the 400-hall medication aide cart was found unlocked and unattended on the 400 hallway when Medication Aide-H was passing medications on the 400-hall. This state surveyor was able to open all drawers revealing multiple…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0813 — isolatedHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to enact a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors to ensure safe and sanitary storage, handling, and consumption, for 1 (Resident #56) of 8 residents reviewed, in that: Resident #56's personal refrigerator located in her room was observed on 02/18/2025, and there was a small plastic cup inside the refrigerator, but no date and no label on the plastic cup. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of foodborne illness due to consuming foods which might be spoiled. The findings included: Record review of Resident #56's face sheet, dated 02/21/2025, reflected the resident was [AGE] years old female and was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses included: Parkinsonism (tremor, slowed movement, rigidity, and postural instability), urinary tract infection (bladder infection), hypertensive (high blood pressure), muscle wasting and atrophy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assured accurate administering of all drugs to meet the needs of residents for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pharmaceutical services, in that: The facility did not reorder Resident #1's Anastrozole for chemo treatment timely, resulting in Resident #1 missing 3 doses (06/21/24, 06/22/24, and 06/23/24) of Anastrozole. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The PNC began on 06/24/2024 and ended on 06/25/2024. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. These failures could place residents who receive medications administered by the facility at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of their medication. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 01/10/2025, revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female who originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], and discharged on 06/24/2024…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-24 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free of any significant medication errors for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1), reviewed for medication errors. 1. The facility staff failed to hold Resident #1's digoxin (medication used to manage and treat heart failure and certain abnormal heart rhythms) per physician ordered parameters on 2/18/24 and 2/25/24. 2. The facility staff failed to administer Resident #1's midodrine (medication used to raise abnormally low blood pressure) as ordered to be given PRN every 8 hours for SBP<100 on 2/11/24, 2/18/24, 2/25/24, 3/3/24, and 3/13/24 (5 instances) when the resident's SBP was below 100. These failures could place residents at risk of a critically low pulse and blood pressures, inadequate blood flow, missed signs and symptoms of illness, hospitalization, and death. The findings were: Closed record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 3/24/24, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, maintain medical records on each resident that were complete and accurately documented for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for medical records. 1. The facility staff failed to document a blood pressure and a pulse prior to or after administration of Resident #1's digoxin (medication used to manage and treat heart failure and certain abnormal heart rhythms) that had ordered parameters to hold the medication if the blood pressure or pulse was outside of the parameters from 2/13/24 to 2/17/24, 2/19/24 to 2/24/24 and 2/26/24 to 3/13/24 (23 days). 2. The facility staff failed to document a blood pressure for Resident #1's midodrine (medication used to treat abnormally low blood pressure) every 8 hours as ordered to be given PRN every 8hours for low blood pressure from 2/1/24 to 2/29/24 (all of February), and 3/1/24 to 3/13/24 (13 days). These failures could place residents at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safely for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation during the initial tour. A. Food items were not clearly labeled to indicate safe preparation for or consumption by residents. B. Kitchen spatulas were not in good working condition and the rubber parts had tears. C. Food stored in the walk-in cooler were not completely covered. D. Kitchen Equipment was damaged and dirty. E. Areas of the kitchen floor appeared to be holding water and was dirty F. Kitchen equipment was stored on the floor. G. Nourishment rooms contained inoperable freezing units, contained expired food, and unlabeled food. These deficient practices could place residents at risk for cross-contamination and foodborne illness. Findings included: 1. The following items were viewed in the walk-in cooler: a. 6 large bags of a clear yellow substance had been removed from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-26 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow up on concerns discussed in resident's council meeting for 7 of 9 residents reviewed for resident council. The facility failed to show follow up on complaints and grievances made in resident council. This failure could place residents that participate in a resident council at risk of not having the right to their concerns and grievances followed through with. Finding included: Review of resident council minute meetings revealed complaints about food but no information regarding how the concerns and complaints were followed up on. In a group interview on 1/24/24 at 2:00 p.m. seven residents in a confidential resident group interview said they have made the same complaints about food over the last year. They stated they have continued to have the same issues with food being cold, not appetizing, not receiving follow up or follow through with the voiced concerns regarding food. The same example was given by multiple residents in the confidential group meeting of the meal prior to the day of the meeting that consisted of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for three (Resident #23, # 74, and #164) of three residents reviewed for care plans in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #23's comprehensive care plan addressed the residents individual needs and indicated Resident #23 needed to stop smoking. 2. The Facility failed to ensure Resident #74's comprehensive care plan addressed Resident #74's fluid restriction due to kidney failure/dialysis. 3. The facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan for Resident #164 was completed since the resident's admission. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving inadequate or unnecessary interventions not individualized to their health care needs. The Findings included: 1. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services. Including procedures that assures the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of medications on 3 of 3 medication storage rooms reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility did not dispose of loose medications, expired syringes and expired odor eliminators bottles from the medication storage room. This failure could place residents who receive medications at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of the medications. Findings included: During an observation on 1/23/20204 at 11:24 a.m., of the medication room for 100 and 500 halls, there were 17 of 32 bottles of expired Assure C Odor Eliminator bottles. An expired 12 pack of beer. A loose white round pill was found in a cat food box under the sink. During an interview on 1/23/2024 at 11:24 a.m., RN A verified the expired odor eliminators, beer and loose pill. She stated that the medication aides or nurses should be reconciling the medication rooms. She stated that any loose medication should…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-26 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' pharmacist medication regimen review recommendations were reviewed by the resident's attending physician and what, if any, action has been taken to address them, for 3 of 7 residents (Residents #33, #65, and #12) whose records were reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure the physician provided a precise clinical rationale in response to the consulting pharmacist's recommended changes for medication regimen review. This failure could place residents at risk for significant health status declines. The findings included: Record review of Resident #33's face sheet dated, 01/26/2024, reflected a [AGE] year-old resident initially admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including cerebral infarction (the pathologic process that results in an area of necrotic tissue in the brain). Record review of Resident #33's quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 11/20/2023, reflected Resident #33 was taking antidepressant medication. Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-26 · tag F0944 — patternConduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to include as part of its QAPI program, mandatory training that outlined and informed staff of the elements and goals of the facility's QAPI program, for 14 of the 15 staff members (the ADM, the DON, ADON, LVN H, RN C, LVN I, SW, AD, DM, DOR, CNA B, CNA A, CNA C, CNA D, CNA E) reviewed for mandatory training, in that: Fourteen staff members (the ADM, the DON, ADON, LVN H, RN C, LVN I, SW, AD, DM, DOR, CNA B, CNA A, CNA C, CNA D, CNA E) reviewed for mandatory training had not received training regarding the facility's QAA-QAPI program. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving inadequate care from staff who are unfamiliar with the facility's QAPI program. The findings included: Record review of employee files reflected no documented evidence the following employees received training regarding the QAPI program: -ADM was hired on 11/01/2019 -DON hired on 12/15/2023 -ADON, hired on 06/07/2021 -LVN H, hired on 05/09/2022 -RN C, hired on 09/05/2023 -LVN I, hired on 07/01/2022 -SW, hired on 08/03/2021 -AD, hired on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-26 · tag F0946 — patternProvide training in compliance and ethics.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure all staff received training in compliance and ethics for 14 of the 15 staff members (the ADM, the DON, ADON, LVN H, RN C, LVN I, SW, AD, DM, DOR, CNA B, CNA A, CNA C, CNA D, CNA E) reviewed for mandatory training, in that: Fourteen staff members (the ADM, the DON, ADON, LVN H, RN C, LVN I, SW, AD, DM, DOR, CNA B, CNA A, CNA C, CNA D, CNA E) reviewed for mandatory training had not received training regarding compliance and ethics. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving inadequate care from staff who are uneducated on compliance and ethics. The findings included: Record review of employee files reflected no documented evidence the following employees received training regarding compliance and ethics: -ADM was hired on 11/01/2019 -DON hired on 12/15/2023 -ADON, hired on 06/07/2021 -LVN H, hired on 05/09/2022 -RN C, hired on 09/05/2023 -LVN I, hired on 07/01/2022 -SW, hired on 08/03/2021 -AD, hired on 08/02/2022 -DM, hired on 11/01/2019 -DOR, hired on 11/01/2019 -CNA B, hired on 07/25/2022 -CNA A, hired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of resident needs for 1 of 4 (Resident #30) residents reviewed for call lights in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #30's call light was within reach and placed for easy access. The deficient practice could place residents at risk of not receiving care or attention needed and risk of falling. The Findings Included: Record review of Resident #30's face sheet, dated 01/25/2024 revealed a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included traumatic brain injury (usually results from a violent blow or jolt to the head or body), dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities), muscle wasting and atrophy of the left and right hand (Muscle wasting is a loss of muscle mass due to the muscles weakening and shrinking), non- traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (blood vessel in the brain ruptures and causes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to formulate an advanced directive for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #33, #92) reviewed for advance directives. Resident #33's OOH-DNR form was invalid because the attending physician's date signed was missing from the form. Resident #92's OOH-DNR form was invalid because the notary's date signed was missing from the form. This failure could result in resident DNR's not being properly executed. The findings included: Record review of Resident #33's face sheet dated, 01/26/2024, reflected a [AGE] year-old resident initially admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Cerebral Infarction (the pathologic process that results in an area of necrotic tissue in the brain). Record review of Resident #33's comprehensive person-centered care plan, dated 09/27/2023 reflected [Resident #33] and family have elected DNR status with an initiated date of 09/22/2022. Record review of Resident #33's clinical records reflected an OOH-DNR, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public for 1 of 5 (Resident #87) resident room bathrooms. The bathroom sink faucet sprayed out water onto the floor when turned on. This failure could place residents at risk for an unsafe and unsanitary environment. The Findings included: Interview and observation with Resident #87 of room [ROOM NUMBER] in the resident's bathroom on 1/23/2024 at 11:17 a.m., revealed the resident showed the State Surveyor while in the bathroom and stated you have to turn on the faucet like this and low because if you don't it spray you and it gets all on the floor, sometimes I forget and it all gets wet, It just makes a mess. Interview and observation on 01/24/2024 at approximately 6:30 p.m. with the MS, the MS said the faucet should not be like that. I have not seen that was reported but these things do happen. The MS stated, the town water supply causes a lot of build up in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed conduct initially and periodically a comprehensive, accurate, standardized reproducible assessment of each resident's functional capacity within 14 calendar days of admission, excluding readmissions in which there was no significant change in the resident's physical or mental condition for 2 of 8 residents (Resident #164 and # 108) reviewed for Comprehensive Assessments and timing. The facility failed to ensure an MDS Assessment for Resident #164 was completed within 14 days after admission. The facility failed to code the MDS Assessment for Resident #108 correctly after discharge from the facility. This failure could place residents at risk for improper or incorrect care and services necessary for their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings included: Record review of resident #164's face sheet dated 01/24/2024, revealed an admission date of 01/11/2024, Record review of resident #164's medical record revealed that as of 01/25/2024, the MDS assessments showed as due or overdue. Interview with MDS Coordinator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to accurately assess and reflect the resident's status for 1 of 26 residents (Resident #96) reviewed for accuracy of assessments in that: Resident #96's diagnosis for hypertension (high blood pressure) was not reflected on the comprehensive assessment dated [DATE]. This failure could place other residents at risk for improper or incorrect care and services necessary for their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The findings included: Review of Resident #96's electronic face sheet dated 01/26/2024 revealed Resident #96 was [AGE] years old and was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included congestive heart failure, CVA (stroke), peripheral vascular disease (a slow and progressive circulation disorder. Narrowing, blockage, or spasms in a blood vessel), diabetes, anxiety, depression, hypertension (high blood pressure), paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (an irregular and often very rapid heart rhythm (arrhythmia) that can lead to blood clots in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as was possible for 1 of 4 (Resident #44) residents reviewed for accident hazards in that: Resident #44's bed was left in a high position after receiving incontinent care from CNA B. This deficient practice could affect residents emotionally and could result in injury. The findings included: Record review of Resident #44's face sheet dated 01/25/2024 revealed an [AGE] year-old female who was originally admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities). Diabetes a chronic (long-lasting) health condition that affects how your body turns food into energy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)(diseases that cause airflow blockage and breathing-related problems), muscle wasting and atrophy of right and left shoulder and right and left…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were provided the fluids to maintain proper hydration for 1 of 1 (Resident #74) resident reviewed for fluid restriction in that: Resident #74's fluid restriction was not maintained as ordered, broken down as to how much nursing and dietary was to serve for meals, and nursing to use for medications being given. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving proper hydration and could result in the residents being dehydrated. The findings included: Review of Resident #74's face sheet revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included end stage renal disease, cerebral palsy, anemia, diabetes with diabetic neuropathy, hypertension, anxiety, depression, peripheral vascular disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Review of Resident #74's care plan dated 11/20/2023 revealed a care plan that addresses hemo-dialysis related to renal failure with an intervention for Fluid Restriction:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning, is provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 8 (Resident #72) reviewed for respiratory care. Resident #72's oxygen was set at 2 liters rather than the physician's order for 4 lpm and there was no humidifier bottle. This failure could affect residents administered oxygen and could lead to residents not receiving the therapeutic effects of oxygen; and could lead to a diminished quality of life. The findings were: Record review of Resident#72's face sheet, dated 1/24/2024,revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (disease that cause airflow blockage and breathing-related problems) and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (not enough oxygen in your blood). Record review of Resident#72's MDS assessment (minimum data set), dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were given psychotropic medications to treat specific diagnoses for 2 (Resident #12 & #99) of 7 Residents, reviewed for unnecessary psychotropic medications. The facility failed to 1. Ensure the medication (Ativan) was administered to treat a specific, clinically diagnosed illness for Resident #12. 2. Ensure a PRN psychotropic medication order was limited to fourteen days for Resident #12. 3. Ensure the medication Sertraline was administered to treat a specific, clinically diagnosed illness for Resident #99. This failure could affect residents who received psychotropics in the facility and put them at risk for adverse consequences such as impairment or decline in an individual's mental or physical condition or functional or psychosocial status. The findings included: Record review of Resident #12's face sheet, dated 01/26/2024, reflected a [AGE] year-old resident initially admitted on [DATE] diagnoses including dementia (a group of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0840 — isolatedEmploy or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to arrange an appointment with an outside resource for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #94) reviewed for the use of outside resources, in that: The facility did not have an order in Resident #94's electronic medical record for follow up care with the neurologist, nor follow up appointment. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving needed medical care. Findings included: Resident #94's face sheet, dated 01/26/2024, revealed Resident #94 was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included: intellectual disability, unspecified, epilepsy, deaf nonspeaking, cerebral palsy, muscle wasting and muscle atrophy. Review of Resident #94's electronic medical record revealed a progress note from a community neurologist stating Resident #94 was seen on 10/23/2023 by the neurologist and had been referred by MD Z . Review of Resident #94's electronic medical record and order summary page dated did not reveal an order for continued neurological services, nor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that are complete and accurately documented for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #94), The facility failed to document the clinicial rationale or complete medication regimen for Resident #94. This failure could place residents at risk of not having accurate medical records and could create confusion in services provided or needed to be provided. The findings included: Review of Resident #94's face sheet, dated 01/26/2024 revealed, Resident #94 was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included: intellectual disability, unspecified, epilepsy, deaf nonspeaking, cerebral palsy, muscle wasting and muscle atrophy. Review of Resident's most recent medical provider progress note with a service date of January 5, 2024 written by NP X and signed on 01/13/2024 at 6:25 p.m. did not document the resident's complete medication regimen nor provide clinical rationale. Interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents/resident representatives were informed in advance, by the physician or other practitioner or professional, of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives or treatment options and to choose the alternative or option he or she prefers for 1 of 2 Residents (Resident #1) reviewed for resident rights in that: The facility failed to notify Resident #1's Medical Power of Attorney or emergency contact after a behavioral incident when the resident did not have the cognitive ability to make informed medical decision before before receiving psychiatric services. This failure could place residents and their resident representatives at risk for not being informed about care and treatments that may affect the resident's well-being. The findings included: Review of a resident's face sheet dated 11/30/2023 indicated Resident #1 was an 82 - year- old initially admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, the facility failed to report the results of all investigations to the State Survey agency within 5 working day of the incident for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility did not provide the state agency with a provider investigation within 5 working days. This failure could place residents at risk of injury, abuse and neglect. Findings included: A face sheet dated 11/30/2023 indicated Resident #1 was an [AGE] year old initially admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to the following: myopathy (disease that affects the muscled that control voluntary movement in the body), Cerebral infarction (stroke due to disrupted blood flow in the brain), and diabetes (disease that results in too much sugar in the blood). An MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had a BIMS of 2 indicating severe cognitive impairment. An incident report dated 08/31/2023 at 1:02 pm revealed an unidentified resident was sitting at their usual dining table, when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$29,026 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $29,026 — penalty dated 2024-03-24
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 3.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 4.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
The other 341 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 341; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| MARTIN, KYLE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2019 |
| YU, HAORAN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2019 |
| APOLINAR, ADAM | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 07/01/2022 |
| BURNAM, SOON | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 12/20/2021 |
| KEETCH, CHAD | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 03/01/2011 |
| LAKE ISLAND HEALTHCARE, INC. | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/13/2025 |
| ENSIGN SERVICES INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/14/2019 |
| LAKEWOOD HEALTH HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2019 |
| STANDARD BEARER HEALTHCARE OP, LP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2019 |
| THE ENSIGN GROUP INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2019 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 455732. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.