No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Legend Healthcare And Rehabilitation - Paris

520 SE 8th St, Paris, TX 75460 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (903) 737-9820 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (903) 737-9820 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$16,149 in federal fines
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
Worth asking about
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (43) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $16,149 in federal fines (most recent 2024-11-20)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1001 E Austin St · (903) 785-5800 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
925 Clarksville St · (903) 785-3297 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Paris #140.2 mi
925 Clarksville St
Park
Typically dawn to dusk

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased14.6%15.8%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.6%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.7%2.4%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.5%3.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened17.3%14.0%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication19.4%18.0%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.1%3.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control13.4%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table8.4%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.9%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.2%88.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission23.6%25.7%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.4%12.3%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.072.171.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.862.061.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 122 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

44.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
82.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.94U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.45hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.29hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.20hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 82.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 51 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.94 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 96% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF44.3%CMS range 35.6–52.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.2%CMS range 9.6–15.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge82.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge64.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge58.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified87.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.4%CMS range 4.1–12.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.141.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.67
RN hours/ resident / day
0.67
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.85
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.19
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.47
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 79.9 residents a day — about 67% occupied, or roughly 40 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.19 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.67 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.85 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.74 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.37 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-05)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2024-11-20)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

43 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents and injury from hot liquid spills for 1 of 6 resident's (Resident #173) reviewed for accident and supervision. Resident #173 sustained a thermal burn from spilling hot coffee on her leg, served by CNA A without obtaining the temperature of the liquid on 11/12/2024. The noncompliance was identified as past non-compliance (PNC). The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) began on 11/12/2024 and ended on 11/14/2024. The facility had corrected the non-compliance before the survey began. This failure could place residents served hot liquids at risk for thermal burns if spilled. The findings included: Record review of Resident #173's undated face sheet revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of diabetes mellitus type II (condition that happens when the body cannot regulate the way sugar is used as fuel), COPD (a group…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to immediately consult with the resident's physician when there was significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status for 2 of 6 residents (Resident # 4 and Resident #30) reviewed for notification of changes. 1.The facility failed to notify the physician for Resident #4's blood sugars above 401 on 01/08/26, 01/16/26, 01/18/26, 01/22/26, and 01/31/26 2.The facility failed to notify the physician for Resident #30's blood sugars above 401 on 01/09/26, 01/17/26, 01/16/26, and 01/22/26. These failures could place residents at risk of their physicians not being aware of the resident conditions and delay treatments for the residents' conditions.Findings included:1.Record review of Resident #4's face sheet dated 02/04/26 indicated he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included diabetes (a condition that happens when your blood sugar (glucose) is too high), stroke (lack of adequate blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-05 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that it was free of medication error rate of 5 percent or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 10%, based on 4 errors out of 40 opportunities, which involved 4 of 7 residents (Resident #74, Resident #46, Resident #40 and Resident #3) reviewed for medication administration. The facility failed to ensure LVN E administered Resident #74 Humalog KwikPen (insulin medication) according to the manufacturer's instructions.The facility failed to ensure LVN F primed Resident #46 Novolog KwikPen (insulin medication) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The facility failed to ensure LVN F administer 4 units of Novolog KwikPen to Resident #46 on 02/05/26 according to physician orders.The facility failed to ensure LVN E administered Resident #40 IV Vancomycin (infection medication) according to the manufacturer's instructions.The facility failed to ensure CMA G administration Resident #3 Allopurinol (gout medication)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-05 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents were free of significant medication errors for 3 of 7 residents review for pharmacy services (Resident #74, Resident #46, and Resident #40. ) 1.The facility failed to ensure LVN E administered Resident #74 Humalog KwikPen (insulin medication) according to the manufacturer's instructions.2.The facility failed to ensure LVN F administered Resident #46 Novolog KwikPen (insulin medication) according to the manufacturer's instructions.3.The facility failed to ensure LVN E administered Resident #V Vancomycin (infection medication) according to the manufacturer's instructions. This failure could place residents at risk of medical complications and not receiving the therapeutic effects of their medications.1.Record review of Resident #74 face sheet indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility originally 07/07/23 with the primary diagnosis of TYPE 1 DIABETES MELLITUS WITH HYPERGLYCEMIA (a chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen, in that: 1. There was an open can of soda, an uncovered Styrofoam cup, an energy drink and a plastic drink container from unapproved sources observed on a food prep counter in the kitchen. This failure could place residents who received meals and/or snacks from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness. The findings included: Observation on 02/02/2026 at 9;40 a.m. revealed an open can of soda and an uncovered Styrofoam cup with approximately 4 ounces of dark liquid assumed to be coffee in the kitchen on the food prep counter. Observation on 02/03/2026 at 7:15 a.m. revealed an open 16-ounce energy drink and an open 16-ounce plastic container with tan liquid that appeared to be iced coffee. During an interview on 02/02/2026 at 9:50 a.m., [NAME] M stated she had not noticed the personal drink items on the food prep area and that she would have them removed right away. [NAME] M stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-05 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — pattern
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility assessment was reviewed and updated as necessary, and at least annually for 1 of 1 facility. 1. The facility did not update the facility assessment to include Resident #38 gastrostomy (surgical procedure that creates an opening in the stomach, allowing for the insertion of a feeding tube (G-tube) for nutritional support). 2. The facility failed to include on the facility assessment the care of bariatric residents. These failures could affect residents by not having the necessary resources to ensure appropriate care is provided. Findings included: Record review of the facility's assessment reviewed on 06/17/25 reflected zero enteral feeding and did not address bariatric residents. 1. Record review of Resident #38's face sheet, dated 02/04/26, reflected Resident #38 was an [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis which included gastrostomy. Record review of Resident #38's quarterly MDS assessment,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to, based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 3 of 13 residents (Residents #5, 6, and 15) in that: Residents #5, Resident #6 and Resident #15 had pacemakers/defibrillator and had no specific guidelines for maintenance, precautions and care. The practice guidelines related to the maintenance, precautions and care were not clearly communicated in the EMR. These 3 residents had no specific care plan for pacemaker and defibrillator care or documentation of coordination of care with a cardiologist. These failures could result in residents experiencing cardiovascular problems, improper cardiac monitoring/transmission and follow up care.The findings include: Record review of Resident #5's face sheet dated 02/05/2026 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included presence of an automatic (implantable)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 1.The facility failed to ensure RN P wore PPE (gown) while performing wound care on 02/04/26.2.The facility failed to ensure CNA S wore PPE (gown) while performing care on 02/03/26.3. The facility failed to have Personal Protective Equipment, also known as PPE, (is specialized clothing or equipment worn to protect individuals from hazards in various settings, such as the workplace, and includes items like gloves, safety helmets, masks, and eye protection) outside Resident #64's and Resident #5's rooms, who required enhanced barrier precautions also known as EBP (an infection control strategy that uses gowns and gloves during high-contact care activities to reduce the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs).These failures could place any resident at the facility at risk for cross-contamination and the spread of infection. Finding included: 1.Record review of Resident #78's face sheet, dated 02/06/25, revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and provided care in a manner that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1 of 26 residents (Resident #44) reviewed for resident rights. The facility did not ensure Resident #44 had the correct size briefs to go to dialysis. This failure could place residents at an increased risk of embarrassment, isolation, and diminished quality of life.Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #44's face sheet, dated 02/04/26, reflected Resident #44 was a [AGE] year-old female, readmitted to the facility 01/14/26 with a diagnosis which included morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories. Record review of Resident #44's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 12/17/25, reflected Resident #44 made herself understood, and understood others. Resident #44's BIMS score was a 15, which reflected her cognition was intact. The assessment reflected Resident #44 was dependent with toileting,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to be informed in advance, by the physician or other practitioner or professional, of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives or treatment options and to choose the alternative or option he or she prefers for 1 of 26 (Resident #44) residents reviewed for psychoactive medications. The facility did not ensure Resident #44 had signed a psychotropic consent for Prozac (antidepressant) 40 mg. This failure could place residents at risk for receiving unnecessary psychotropic medications without informed consent.Findings included: Record review of Resident #44's face sheet, dated 02/04/26, reflected Resident #44 was a [AGE] year-old female, readmitted to the facility 01/14/26 with a diagnosis which included depression (mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). Record review of Resident #44's order summary report dated 02/04/26…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible, and each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #60) reviewed for accident hazards and supervision. The facility did not ensure Resident #60 wore a smoking apron on 02/03/26 at 9:30 a.m. smoke break. This failure could place residents who smoke at risk of physical harm. Findings included: Record review of Resident #60's face sheet dated, 02/04/26, reflected Resident #60 was a [AGE] year-old female, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis which included Tourette's disorder (nervous system disorder characterized by involuntary, repetitive movements and sounds known as tics). Record review of Resident #60's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 12/19/25, reflected #60 rarely/never understood others, and rarely/never made herself understood. Resident #60 had a BIMS score of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 32 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to establish a system of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable accurate reconciliation and determine that drug records were in order and that an account of all controlled drugs were maintained and periodically reconciled for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #59 and Resident #54) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #59's discontinued wrapped in the back of the narcotic box Diazepam (controlled medication used to treat anxiety) was being accurately reconciled on 02/04/26. The facility failed to ensure Resident #54's discontinued wrapped in the back of the narcotic box Lyrica (controlled medication used for pain) was being accurately reconciled on 02/04/26. These failures could place residents at risk for loss of prescribed medications, resident's safety, and drug diversion.Findings included:1.Record review of Resident #59's face sheet, dated 02/05/26, indicated a [AGE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled and stored in accordance with professional standards for 2 of 4 medication storage areas (300 hall Medication Cart and medication refrigerator) observed for storage and security. 1. The facility failed to ensure MA H secured the 300 hall Medication Cart, when it was not in use and unattended on 02/02/2026. 2. The facility did not ensure Resident #14's medication named Lorazepam (used for anxiety) was secure in the unlocked refrigerator on 02/04/26. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving drugs and biologicals as needed, medication errors, medication misuse, and drug diversion.Findings included: 1. During an observation and interview starting on 02/02/2026 at 10:31 AM, there was an unlocked, unattended medication cart at the beginning of hall 400. Multiple staff and residents passed by the unlocked, unattended medication cart. At 10:46 AM, the DON observed the surveyor standing by the 300 hall Medication Cart,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food that was palatable and served at an appetizing temperature for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #43, Resident #62) and 1 of 1 lunch meal reviewed for palatability. The facility did not provide palatable food served at an appetizing temperature or taste to Resident #43 and #62 who complained the food was served cold and did not taste good. This failure could place residents who ate food from the kitchen at risk of weight loss, altered nutritional status, and diminished quality of life. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 02/02/2026 at 11:30 a.m., [NAME] M completed temperature checks for all food textures and meal items prior to the start of the tray line and annotated temperatures in the temperature logbook. All temperatures were within acceptable temperature parameters. [NAME] M stated she checked the temperature at the start of the meal and about halfway through the meal service. [NAME] M stated if a resident complained that the meal items were cold, she would retake the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — isolated
    Have policies on smoking.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow established policy regarding smoking areas, and smoking safety for 1 of 1 facility. 1. The facility failed to provide a metal container with a self-closing cover device. 2. The facility did not ensure smoked cigarettes were extinguished in a fire-retardant receptacle. These failures could place residents and staff at risk of unsafe smoking and injury.Findings included: During an observation on 02/03/26 at 9:30 a.m., there was a 31-gallon galvanized removable lid outdoor trash can with numerous cigarettes butts observed in it. There were numerous cigarette butts laying on the ground. There was no metal ash tray observed in the smoking area. During an interview on 02/04/26 at 4:40 p.m., Maintenance B stated it was ok to dispose of the cigarette butts in the outdoor trash with removable lid because it was a metal container. Maintenance B stated he did not notice the cigarette butts on the ground. Maintenance B stated they should be disposed of in the metal container. Maintenance B stated these failures…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure in accordance with professional standards and practices, the medical records on each resident were accurately documented for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accurate medical records. The facility failed to ensure LVN A accurately documented on Resident #1's medical record the time of physician notification in the progress note dated 7/15/25. This failure could place residents at risk of emergency situations not being accurately documented, leading to confusion on what occurred when.Findings included:Record review of the face sheet dated 7/24/25 indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including syncope and collapse (fainting, or sudden temporary loss of consciousness), congestive heart failure (a chronic condition in which the heart does not pump blood as well as it should), hypertension (elevated blood pressure), and pulmonary hypertension (a type of high blood pressure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-20 · tag F0636 — pattern
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct initially and periodically a comprehensive, accurate, standardized reproducible assessment of each resident's functional for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #13 and Resident #28) reviewed for comprehensive assessments and timing. The facility did not ensure Resident #13's Annual MDS assessment was completed within 14 days of admission. The facility did not ensure Resident #28's admission MDS assessment was completed within 14 days of admission. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their needs identified and met. Findings included: Record review of Resident #13's face sheet dated 11/18/24 indicated she was [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included diabetes (high blood sugar). Record review of Resident #13's comprehensive MDS assessment, with an ARD of 10/23/24, indicated in Section A0310 it was an Annual assessment (required by day 14). The MDS assessment for Resident #13 indicated in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-20 · tag F0638 — pattern
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a resident assessment within the required time frame for 4 of 18 residents (Resident #9, Resident #16, Resident #26, and Resident #31) reviewed for quarterly assessments. The facility did not ensure Resident #9, Resident #16, Resident #26, and Resident #31's quarterly MDS assessments were completed within 14 days of the ARD. This failure placed residents at risk of not having their assessments completed timely which could result in not having their individually assessed needs met. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #9's face sheet dated 11/20/24 indicated she was [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility initially on 10/12/21 and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included syncope and collapse (fainting or passing out). Record review of Resident #9's MDS assessment, with an ARD of 10/23/24, indicated in Section A0310 it was a Quarterly assessment (required by day 14). The MDS assessment for Resident #9 indicated in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for 3 of 16 residents (Resident #173, Resident #16, and Resident #61) reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to provide scheduled showers and/or bed baths to Resident #173, Resident #16, and Resident #61 at least 3 times per week. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving services/care and decreased quality of life. Findings included: 1.Record review of Resident #173's undated face sheet revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of diabetes mellitus type II (condition that happens when the body cannot regulate the way sugar is used as fuel), COPD (a group of lung diseases that cause breathing problems over time), and stage III pressure ulcer to the sacrum (deep wound that involves several layers of skin extending to subcutaneous (fatty)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-20 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary medications (is a medication used: In excessive doses (including duplicate therapy); or For excessive duration; or Without adequate monitoring; or Without adequate indication for its use; or In the presence of adverse consequences which indicate the dose should be reduced or discontinued) for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #66) reviewed for unnecessary medications in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #66 had documented diagnoses for the use of Humulin R (Regular insulin, also known as neutral insulin and soluble insulin, is a type of short-acting medical insulin. It is used to treat type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, gestational diabetes, and complications of diabetes such as diabetic ketoacidosis and hyperosmolar hyperglycemic states). This failure could place residents at risk for adverse drug reactions (unintended, harmful events attributed to the use of medicines) and receiving…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-20 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a gradual dose reduction was attempted for 3 of 6 residents (Resident #1, Resident #13, and Resident # 37) reviewed for unnecessary medications/ gradual dose reduction in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure a gradual dose reduction (GDR) was attempted or document contraindication for a gradual dose reduction for Resident #1's ordered Risperdal (antipsychotic medication used to treat certain disorders by changing how the brain uses neurotransmitters) 4mg orally twice daily ordered 04/17/2024. 2. The facility failed to ensure a GDR was attempted or document contraindication for a GDR for Resident #13's Risperdal/risperidone 0.5 mg by mouth two times daily ordered on 3/09/23. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #37's Haldol and Risperidone (antipsychotic medications that treats several types of mental health conditions, including schizophrenia and bipolar disorder) medication had a specific, appropriate diagnosis for use. 4. The facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment, and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 18 residents (Resident #40) reviewed for infection control practices. The facility failed to ensure LVN T performed hand hygiene after blood sugar was taken from a resident. LVN T entered Resident #40's room and did not perform hand hygiene prior to obtaining Resident #40's blood sugar and gave insulin on 11/19/24. These failures could place residents at risk of exposure to communicable diseases, cross-contamination, and infections. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #40's face sheet, dated 11/19/24, indicated she was an [AGE] year-old female was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included diabetes Mellitus with hyperglycemia (elevated blood sugar, is a type 2 diabetes that can…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an antibiotic stewardship program that included a system to monitor antibiotic use, for 1 (Resident #37) of 18 residents reviewed for antibiotic use. The facility failed to conduct appropriate monitoring of antibiotic use for Resident #37 by not including the resident in the Tracking and Trending Log when he was treated for a urinary tract infection. These failures could place residents receiving antibiotics at risk for unnecessary antibiotic use, inappropriate antibiotic use, and increased antibiotic-resistant infections. Findings included: Record review of Resident #37's face sheet dated 11/18/24 revealed he was [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility initially on 06/04/20 and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including vascular dementia (a type of dementia that occurs when blood vessels in the brain are damaged, reducing the flow of oxygen and nutrients to the brain), functional urinary incontinence, and stroke. Record review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in (1 of 1) kitchen reviewed for dietary services. 1) The facility failed to label and date all food items. 2) Dietary staff failed to dispose of expired foods items. 3) Dietary Staff failed to store (1) dented can in a separate area. 4) Dietary Staff failed to effectively reseal, label and date frozen food items. These failures could place residents at risk for food contamination and foodborne illness. The findings include: During observations on 10/09/23 at 9:05 am, the following observations were made in the kitchen walk-in Refrigerator (1 of 1): -(1) bag of lettuce had an open date of 10/2/23 had no expiration, and no receive date. -(2) 1/5 pound of unopened bag lettuce had no receive date and no expiration date. -(1) 4 pound of deli ham placed in a clear zip lock bag had an open date of 10/1/23, no expiration date and no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-12 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right to formulate an advance directive was provided for 3 of 22 residents (Residents #124, #5 and #33) reviewed for advanced directives. 1. The facility did not ensure Resident #124's full code status was discontinued after Resident #124 signed a DNR. 2. The facility did not ensure Resident #5's OOH-DNR was signed by the responsible party. 3. The facility failed to obtain a signature from the attending physician and resident representative on Resident #33's DNR form. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #124's face sheet, dated 10/12/2023, indicated Resident #124 was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included fracture of second lumbar (lower part of the back) vertebra. Record review of Resident #124's physician order summary report, dated 10/12/2023, indicated an active physician's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-12 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the resident status for 4 of 22 residents (Resident # 3, Resident #27, Resident #44, and Resident #60) reviewed for MDS assessment accuracy. The facility failed to accurately reflect Resident #60's need for dialysis on the MDS assessment. The facility failed to accurately document smoking for Residents #27 and #3 on the MDS assessment. The facility failed to accurately reflect Resident #44's weight loss on the MDS assessment. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs. Findings included: 1. Record review of a face sheet dated 10/12/2023 indicated Resident #60 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease with early onset (progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #32) reviewed for treatment of urinary tract infections and 3 of 4 residents (Resident #12, #64, and #51) reviewed for incontinent care and 1 of 2 residents (Resident #36) reviewed for treatment and services related to indwelling catheters. The facility failed to ensure CNA C used a clean wipe after each stroke while providing catheter care to Resident #12. The facility did not ensure NA Y cleaned Resident #64 peri-anal area before placing a clean brief underneath her and applying barrier cream. The facility did not ensure NA O cleaned Resident #51 front peri area prior to cleaning the peri anal. The facility failed to ensure Resident #32 received teaching regarding proper perineal care to prevent future UTIs. The facility did not ensure Resident #36 foley catheter (connection…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate dispensing and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for 5 of 22 residents (Residents #2, Resident #33, Resident #47, Resident #52, and Resident #55) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to keep a record of receipt of controlled medications awaiting disposition to allow accurate and periodic reconciliation. The facility failed to ensure the witnesses signed with the Pharmacy Consultant when drugs were destructed. These failures could place the residents at risk of not having medications available for use and drug diversion. Findings included: 1. Record review of a face sheet dated 10/12/2023 indicated Resident #2 was a [AGE] year-old female initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (condition where there's not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled and stored in accordance with professional standards for 3 of 4 medication carts (MA 100 hall, Nurse 200 and even rooms on 300 hall, and Nurse 500 hall), 1 of 2 medication storage rooms (Medication room at the beginning of 200 hall) reviewed for drugs and biologicals and for 3 of 22 residents (Residents #59, #14, and #67 ) reviewed for storage of medications. 1. The facility failed to ensure bisacodyl (medication used for constipation) and hydrocortisone acetate (medication used for hemorrhoids) suppositories in the refrigerator in the medication storage room at the beginning of the 200 hall were discarded when they expired. The facility failed to ensure multi-dose bottles of over-the-counter medications on the MA 100 hall medication cart were dated when opened. 2. The facility failed to ensure inhalers (devices used to administer inhaled medications to treat…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-12 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide food that was palatable, attractive and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 2 of 6 meals (10/10/23 lunch meal and 10/11/23 lunch meal) reviewed for palatability and temperature. The facility failed to provide food that was palatable for 1 of 3 meal observed on 10/10/23 (lunch) meal. The facility failed to provide food that was palatable and appetizing temperature for 1 of 3 meal observed on 10/11/23 (lunch) meal. These failures could place residents at risk of decreased food intake, hunger, and unwanted weight loss. The findings included: During observation on 10/09/23 at 12:40 p.m., the dietary staff served the residents lunch meal trays with only the top plate food warmer only. During observation on 10/10/23 at 7:40 a.m., the dietary staff served the residents breakfast meal trays with only the top plate food warmer only. During a resident council interview on 10/10/23 at 3:33 p.m., Resident # 1, Resident #12, Resident #32, Resident #58 and Resident #61 stated the food was served cold sometimes.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-12 · tag F0849 — pattern
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to collaborate with hospice representatives and coordinate the hospice care planning process for each resident receiving hospice services, to ensure quality of care for the resident, ensuring communication with the hospice medical director, the resident's attending physician, and others participating in the provision of care for 3 of 3 residents (Resident #33, Resident #36, and Resident #43) reviewed for hospice services. The facility did not ensure Resident #33's hospice records were a part of their records in the facility. The facility did not ensure Resident #36's hospice records were a part of their records in the facility. The facility did not ensure Resident #43's hospice records were a part of their records in the facility. This failure could place residents who receive hospice services at-risk of receiving inadequate end-of-life care due to a lack of documentation, coordination of care, and communication of resident needs. Findings included: 1.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 4 of 6 staff (CNA C, MA S, NA Y, and NA O) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure CNA C performed hand hygiene in between glove changes. The facility failed to ensure CNA C used a clean wipe after each stroke while providing catheter care. The facility did not ensure NA Y cleaned Resident #64's peri-anal area before placing a clean brief underneath her and applying barrier cream. The facility did not ensure NA Y performed hand hygiene and changed gloves while providing incontinent care to Resident #64. The facility did not ensure NA O changed gloves while providing incontinent care to Resident #51. The facility failed to ensure MA S performed hand hygiene after glove removal and during medication administration. These failures could place residents and staff at risk for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-12 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promote antibiotic stewardship by ensuring the appropriate use of antibiotic therapy and providing written rationale, by the provider, when an antibiotic was used despite criteria, to determine the appropriate the use of an antibiotic for 3 of 3 residents (Residents #8, 33, and #125) reviewed for antibiotic use. The facility failed to ensure Residents #8, #33, and #125 had documented signs and symptoms, appropriate lab work, and diagnoses to support the use of prescribed antibiotics. This failure could place residents receiving antibiotics at risk for unnecessary antibiotic use, inappropriate antibiotic use, and increased antibiotic-resistant infections. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #8's face sheet, dated 10/12/2023, indicated Resident #8 was a [AGE] year-old female, readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis which included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (low level oxygen in the body tissues). There was no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and provide care in a manner that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1 of 1 dining room reviewed for resident rights. The facility did not ensure LVN A treated residents with dignity and respect by referring to them as feeders. This failure could place residents at an increased risk of embarrassment, isolation, and diminished quality of life. Findings included: During a dining observation on 10/09/2023 at 12:08 p.m., LVN A stated to CNA C, how many feeders were on Hall 200. LVN A was approximately 5 feet from dining room tables where residents were sitting. During a dining observation on 10/09/2023 at 12:12 p.m., LVN A stated to CNA D, MDS Coordinator and a sister facility DON, somebody need to come feed the feeders. LVN A was approximately 5 feet from dining room tables where residents were sitting. During an interview on 10/09/2023 at 1:45 p.m., LVN A stated the word assistance should be used instead of the word feeder. LVN A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-12 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident had the right to make choices about aspects of his or her life in the facility that were significant to the resident for 1 of 22 residents (Resident #12) reviewed for self-determination. The facility failed to ensure Resident #12 was assisted out of bed. This failure could place residents at risk for being denied the opportunity to exercise his or her autonomy regarding things that are import in their life and decrease their quality of life. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 10/12/2023, indicated Resident #12 was a [AGE] year-old female initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included chronic diastolic congestive heart failure (condition where the left ventricle of the heart becomes stiffer than normal and can't relax or fill up with blood), type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia (chronic condition that affects the way the body processes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment in 1 of 62 Rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER]) reviewed for a clean and homelike environment. The facility failed to ensure room [ROOM NUMBER] was cleaned daily, and in accordance with the facility's Housekeeping Checklist. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of infections and living in an uncomfortable environment leading to a decreased quality of life. Findings include: Record review of Resident #40 face sheet, dated 10/10/2023, indicated Resident #40 was an [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included obstructive and reflux uropathy (a condition of the urinary tract), anxiety disorder, hemorrhoids, cognitive communication deficit, history of falling, difficulty in walking, altered mental status unspecified, Hypothyroidism (thyroid gland does not produce enough thyroid hormone) and essential hypertension (high blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to meet resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 22 residents (Resident #124) reviewed for care plans. The facility did not develop Resident #124's care plan related code status. This failure could place residents at risk for inaccurate care plans not receiving care and services to meet their needs. Findings include: Record review of Resident #124's face sheet, dated 10/12/2023, indicated Resident #124 was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included fracture of second lumbar (lower part of the back) vertebra. Record review of Resident #124's physician order summary report, dated 10/12/2023, indicated an active physician's order for code status: DNR with an order date 09/29/2023 and full code with an order date 09/18/2023. Record review of the admission MDS dated [DATE], indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to review and revise the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 2 of 22 residents (Resident #32 and Resident #44) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #32's care plan was updated to indicate she no longer smoked. The facility failed to ensure Resident #44's care plan was updated to indicate weight loss. These failures could place residents at increased risk of not having their individual needs met and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: 1. Record review of a face sheet dated 10/12/2023 indicated Resident #32 was a [AGE] year old female initially admitted to the facility 11/10/2020 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia (chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar resulting in high blood sugars), vascular dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received services to maintain personal hygiene for 1 of 65 (Resident #46) residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to ensure Resident #46's fingernails were trimmed, clean and free from a black colored material. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving services or care, decreased quality of life, and decreased self-esteem. The findings included: Record review of the face sheet, dated on 10/12/23, indicated that Resident #46 was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on initial admission dated 8/14/20, with a diagnosis of Cerebrovascular disease (a group of conditions that affect the blood flow and the blood vessels in the brain, Atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris (buildup of cholesterol plaque in the walls of arteries causing obstruction of blood flow), Vascular dementia (reduce…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents requiring respiratory care were provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practices for 2 of 9 residents (Residents #27 and #60) reviewed for respiratory care. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #27's oxygen was set between 3-4 LPM as ordered by the physician. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #60 had a physician's order for oxygen. These failures could place residents who receive respiratory care at risk for developing respiratory complications and a decreased quality of care. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #27's face sheet, dated 10/12/2023, indicated Resident #27 was an [AGE] year-old female, readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis which included COPD (chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs) and emphysema (a condition in which the air sacs of the lungs are damaged and enlarged). Record review of the order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-12 · tag F0712 — isolated
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were seen by a physician at least once every 30 days for the first 90 days after admission, and at least once every 60 days thereafter or alternate between personal visits by the physician and visits by a physician assistant, nurse practitioner or clinical nurse specialist for 1 of 22 residents (Resident #16) reviewed for physician services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #16 was seen by the facility's attending physician and/or the physician's extender at least once every 60 days from October 2022 through February 2023. This failure could place the residents at risk for medical conditions not being identified, care needs not being met, and a decline in health status. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 10/12/2023 indicated Resident #16 was an [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included major depressive disorder, recurrent, moderate (a serious mood disorder involving…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — isolated
    Have policies on smoking.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their established smoking policy for 1 of 1 smoking area and 1 of 6 (Resident #27) residents reviewed for smoking. 1. The facility did not ensure Resident #27 had a smoking evaluation completed. 2. The facility did not ensure smoked cigarettes were extinguished in a fire-retardant receptacle. These failures could place residents at risk for smoking-related injuries and fires in the facility. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #27's face sheet, dated 10/12/2023, indicated Resident #27 was an [AGE] year-old female, readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis which included hypotension (low blood pressure). Record review of Resident #27's admission MDS, dated [DATE], indicated Resident #27 understood others, and made herself understood. The assessment indicated Resident #27 had a BIMS score of 9, which indicated her cognition was moderately impaired. The assessment indicated Resident #27 did not use tobacco.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 2 shower rooms (located on Hall 2) and 1 of 17 rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER]) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure the shower room (located on Hall 2) was clean and the soiled towels were removed promptly after use. The facility failed to ensure soiled briefs were discarded appropriately from a resident room (room [ROOM NUMBER]). These failures could place residents and staff at risk for cross-contamination and the spread of infection. Findings included: During an observation on 09/26/2023 at 10:22 AM, the shower room commode located on Hall 2 had a brown substance with a strong foul odor on the seat and down the sides. There was a stack of approximately 5 wet towels in the shower stall floor. During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$16,149 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $16,149 — penalty dated 2024-11-20

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 53.2-0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.8+0.2 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 341 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Aspen Health And WellnessOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Bennett Hills Rehabilitation and Care CenterGooding, ID 1 of 5Broadway By The SeaLong Beach, CA 1 of 5Chatsworth Park Health Care CenterChatsworth, CA 1 of 5Clarion Wellness and Rehabilitation CenterClarion, IA 1 of 5Colonial Manor of RandolphRandolph, NE 1 of 5Durango Health And RehabilitationDurango, CO 1 of 5Fort Dodge Health and RehabilitationFort Dodge, IA 1 of 5Greater Southside Health and RehabilitationDes Moines, IA 1 of 5Hearthstone Health And RehabilitationSparks, NV 1 of 5Heritage Gardens Rehabilitation and HealthcareCarrollton, TX 1 of 5Hillcrest Health Care CenterHawarden, IA 1 of 5Lake Village Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterLewisville, TX 1 of 5Lakeside Rehabilitation and Care CenterCoeur d'Alene, ID 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare And Rehabilitation - NorthAustin, TX 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare And Rehabilitation - WaxahaWaxahachie, TX 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare and Rehabilitation - Fort WKeller, TX 1 of 5Madera Post Acute CenterEl Monte, CA 1 of 5Medallion Post Acute RehabilitationColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Mesquite Post Acute CareLubbock, TX 1 of 5Millbrook Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterLancaster, TX 1 of 5Misty Willow Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterHouston, TX 1 of 5New Orange HillsOrange, CA 1 of 5Northeast Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Northgate PlazaIrving, TX 1 of 5Oak View Health And RehabilitationConway, SC 1 of 5Oakwood Care And RehabilitationLakewood, CO 1 of 5Omaha Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterOmaha, NE 1 of 5Onion Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterAustin, TX 1 of 5Park Manor Bee CaveBee Cave, TX 1 of 5Pelican Pointe Health And Rehabilitation CenterWindsor, CO 1 of 5Premier Care Center For Palm SpringsPalm Springs, CA 1 of 5Provo Rehabilitation and NursingProvo, UT 1 of 5Rock Canyon Respiratory And Rehabilitation CenterPueblo, CO 1 of 5Rosewood Rehabilitation CenterReno, NV 1 of 5San Marcos Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterSan Marcos, TX 1 of 5Sonterra Health CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5SouthlandNorwalk, CA 1 of 5Southland Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterLufkin, TX 1 of 5Spencer Post Acute Rehabilitation CenterSpencer, IA

Showing 40 of 341; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
FANNIN COUNTY HOSPITAL AUTHORITYOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 04/01/2017
BURNS, STEPHENIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2022
LAWRENCE, RAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2017
BURNAM, SOONIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/01/2017
KEETCH, CHADIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/01/2017
SANDERSON, CLARKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/29/2012
EIFFEL HEALTHCARE LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2017
ENSIGN SERVICES INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2016
SHERMAN HEALTH HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2022
STANDARD BEARER HEALTHCARE OP, LPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2022
THE ENSIGN GROUP INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+13.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$789K
Related-party expense10% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 64%Medicare 15%Other / private 21%

This home reported $789K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$310per resident / day
operating cost
$9,439per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$357per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 676049. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next