No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Stillhouse Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center

2900 Stillhouse Road, Paris, TX 75462 · Government - Hospital district · 150 certified beds · (903) 785-1601 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (903) 785-1601 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Mar 20241 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$8,162 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (33% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $8,162 in federal fines (most recent 2024-03-07)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2850 Lewis Ln · (903) 739-7400 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
707 Lamar Ave · (903) 785-4208 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
124 W Cherry St · (903) 737-8870 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Johnson St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.5%15.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.2%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.6%2.4%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.4%3.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened12.0%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication18.9%18.0%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.9%3.8%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control16.8%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table9.4%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.5%88.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.9%25.7%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.6%12.3%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.692.171.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.842.061.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 235 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

47.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
13.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
69.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.88U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.35hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.41hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 69.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 66 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.88 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 96% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF47.8%CMS range 41.7–52.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF13.5%CMS range 10.8–17.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge69.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge68.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge47.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting97.8%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge98.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.8%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization10.1%CMS range 7.6–14.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.161.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.29
RN hours/ resident / day
0.89
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.06
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.24
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.17
RN hoursweekends
32.8%
Total nursing turnover
16.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 150 beds and averages 99.6 residents a day — about 66% occupied, or roughly 50 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.24 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.29 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.06 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.71 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.46 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.33 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 33% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

19
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-22)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2024-03-27)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

46 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-03-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents the right to be free from abuse for 1 of 19 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident # 10) in that: On 8/11/23 CNA A slapped Resident #10 on the left forearm with a washcloth multiple times telling her to stop complaining while giving her a shower on 8/11/23. The non-compliance was identified as past non-compliance. The immediate jeopardy (IJ) began on 8/11/23 and ended on 8/16/23. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the investigation began. This failure could place all residents in the facility at risk for physical harm, and pain which could prevent them from achieving their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings included: Resident #10: Record review of a facility face sheet dated 3/6/24 for Resident #10 indicated that she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: chronic multifocal osteomyelitis (a disease that causes pain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure CNA B followed enhanced barrier precautions when providing incontinent care to Resident #1 on 06/06/2026. This failure could place residents at risk for cross contamination and the spread of infection due to lack of implementation of orders. Finding include: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 06/06/2026, revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included pneumonitis (swelling and irritation of the lungs) due to inhalation of food and vomit and need for assistance with personal care. Record review of Resident #1's admission Comprehensive MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-22 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — pattern
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure laboratory services were obtained to meet the needs of 3 of 22 residents (Residents #10, #13 and #27) reviewed for laboratory services. 1. The facility did not obtain a physician's ordered BMP (test used to monitor the blood sugar levels, the balance of electrolytes and fluid as well as the health of kidneys) for Resident #10. 2.The facility did not obtain a physician's ordered Hgb A1C (measures the average blood sugar levels over the past 2-3 months) for Resident #13. 3. The facility did not obtain a physician's ordered CBC (used to measure different parts and features of blood) for Resident #27. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving lab services as ordered and not managing medications at a therapeutic level. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #10's face sheet, dated 05/27/25, reflected Resident #10 was a [AGE] year-old female, readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis which included diabetes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the facility's only kitchen. 1. The facility failed to ensure dented canned goods were removed from the pantry on 05/19/25. 2. The facility failed to ensure the outdated milk was removed from the refrigerator before it expired on 04/25/25. These failures could place residents at risk for food contamination and foodborne illness. Findings included: During an initial tour observation on 05/19/25 beginning at 10:00 a.m., the following were made in the kitchen refrigerator (1 of 1): -(1) carton of milk with an unopened date but an expired date of 04/25/25. During observations on 05/19/25 beginning at 10:00 a.m., the following were made in the kitchen pantry (1 of 1): -(2) dent cans (1) 6 pounds of Mandarin Oranges and (1) 6 pounds of Turnip Greens. During an interview on 05/21/25 at 7:43 a.m., the Dietary manager said the expired milk should have been removed on or before the expiration date. She said the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-22 · tag F0868 — pattern
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a quality assessment and assurance committee consisting at a minimum of the required committee members for 3 of 6 meetings (10/21/24, 11/18/24, and 12/16/24) reviewed for QAA committee. 1. The facility did not ensure the Administrator D, or a representative attended QAPI meetings on 10/21/24, and 12/16/24. 2. The facility did not ensure the DON attended QAPI meetings on 11/18/24, and 12/16/24. These failures could place residents at risk for quality deficiencies being unidentified, no appropriate plans of action developed and implemented, and no appropriate guidance developed. Findings include: Record review of the facility's QAPI Committee sign-in-sheets for 10/21/24 and 12/16/24 reflected the Administrator D or a representative did not sign in for the meetings. Record review of the facility's QAPI Committee sign in sheets for 11/18/24 and 12/16/24 reflected the DON did not sign in for the meetings. During an interview on 05/22/25 beginning at 12:01 p.m., the DON stated she had never missed a QAPI meeting. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 of 4 residents (Resident #24, Resident #36 and Resident #10) reviewed for infection control. 1.The facility failed to ensure CNA L performed hand hygiene while providing incontinent care for Resident #24 on 05/21/25. 2. The facility failed to ensure CNA B and CNA C cleaned Resident #36's front perineal area when they provided incontinent care and failed to ensure CNA B followed enhanced barrier precautions when providing care on 05/19/2025. 3. The facility did not ensure CNA F followed enhanced barrier precautions while assisting Resident #10 with catheter care on 05/20/25. These failures could place any resident at the facility at risk for cross-contamination and spread of infection. Finding included:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident had the right to be informed in advance, by the physician or other practitioner or professional, of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives or treatment options and to choose the alternative or option he or she prefers for 1 of 21 (Residents #66) residents reviewed for psychoactive medications. The facility failed to ensure Resident #66 had signed a psychotropic consent from the resident or family for Ativan (antianxiety medication) before administering to Resident #66 on 05/17/25. This failure could place residents at risk for receiving unnecessary antipsychotic medications without informed consent. Findings included: Record review of Resident #66's face sheet, dated 05/22/25, indicated a [AGE] year-old male who was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses which included Dementia (a general term for a decline in mental ability severe enough to interfere with daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents had the right to formulate an advance directive for 1 of 21 residents (Resident #24) reviewed for advanced directives. The facility failed to complete Resident #24's DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) or Out-of-Hospital do-not-resuscitate (OOH-DNR) form correctly on 07/26/24. This failure could place residents at risk for not having their end-of-life wishes honored and for incomplete records. Findings included: Record review of Resident #24's face sheet, dated 05/22/25, revealed an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include stroke, dementia (progressive loss of intellectual functioning), atrial fibrillation (irregular or rapid heartbeat that causes poor blood flow), and Congestive heart failure, or heart failure,(is a long-term condition in which your heart can't pump blood well enough to meet your body's needs). Record review of Resident #24's face sheet, dated 05/22/25, revealed DNR code…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' right to privacy during personal care for 1 of 22 residents (Resident #24) reviewed for privacy. The facility failed to ensure RN A provided privacy to Resident #24 when she administered Resident #24's medication via her PEG tube (tube placed in the stomach to administer feedings and medications) on 05/20/2025 when RN A did not close the privacy curtain and she did not close the door. This failure could place residents at risk of having their bodies exposed to the public, low self-esteem, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 05/21/2025 indicated Resident #24 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility o 07/19/2024 with diagnoses which included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side and right dominant side (weakness and paralysis after a stroke which affected the left and right side of the body) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, which allowed residents to use his or her personal belongings to the extent possible for 1 of 22 residents (#27) reviewed for environment. The facility did not ensure Resident #27's bathroom drains were free from a foul sewage odor. These failures could place the residents at risk for embarrassment due to the room having a foul odor. Findings include: During an interview and observation on 05/19/25 at 2:16 p.m., two state surveyor observed a foul sewage odor coming from Resident #27's bathroom. Resident #27 stated the smell was worse at night and when it gets hot outside. Resident #27 stated the Maintenance Supervisor and Administrator was aware. Resident #27 was unsure of when the odor issue started but stated, I tell them almost daily about this odor. Resident #27 stated he had never been offered to change rooms. During an interview on 05/19/25 at 2:25 p.m., Housekeeping N stated the bathroom smelled like sewage and she just poured a substance in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures that prohibit mistreatment, neglect, and abuse of residents, for 3 of 22 residents (Resident #23, Resident #32 and Resident #47) reviewed for abuse. 1.The facility failed to follow their policy to report to HHSC when Resident #32 alleged a hospital staff member hit her while in the hospital on 5/10/2025. 2. The facility did not implement their policy on reporting abuse to state agency for a resident-to-resident altercation that occurred on 05/02/25 between Resident #23 and Resident #47. These failures could place residents at risk of abuse, physical harm, mental anguish, and emotional distress. Findings included: Record review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse: Prevention of and Prohibition Against revised 12/2023, indicated, .Allegations of abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, or exploitation will be reported outside the facility and to the appropriate state or federal agencies in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 35 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that caused the allegation did not involve abuse and did not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with state law through established procedures for 3 of 22 residents (Resident #23, Resident #32, and Resident #47) reviewed for abuse. 1.The facility failed to report abuse timely to the state agency on behalf of Resident #32. 2. The facility did not report to HHSC…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the resident status for 2 of 22 residents (Residents #23 and #27) reviewed for MDS assessment accuracy. 1. The facility failed to interview Resident #23 regarding his mood on his 04/18/25 quarterly MDS assessment. 2. The facility failed to accurately reflect Resident #27's active diagnoses to not include a diagnosis of depression (a mood disorder characterized by persistent feelings of sadness and loss of interest or please in activities) on his 04/19/25 quarterly MDS assessment. These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident 23's face sheet dated 05/27/25, reflected Resident #23 was a [AGE] year-old male, readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis which included recurrent depressive disorders. Record review of Resident #23's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 04/18/25, reflected Resident #23 made himself…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs, for 1 of 8 (Resident #29) residents reviewed for the care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #29's fall mat was beside her bed on 05/20/25. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk of not receiving appropriate interventions to meet their current needs. Findings included: Record review of Resident #29's face sheet, dated 05/22/25, indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia (loss of memory), stroke, and history of falling. Record review of Resident 29's admission MDS assessment, dated 1/28/25, indicated Resident #29 understood and by others. Resident #29's BIMS score was 08, indicating her cognition was moderately impaired. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 1 of 22 residents (Resident #68) reviewed for ADL (activities of daily living) care. The facility failed to provide nail care by removing black material from under fingernails for dependent female Resident #68 on 05/19/2025 and 05/20/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs. Findings included: Record review of the face sheet, dated 05/19/2025, revealed Resident #68 was a [AGE] year old female with diagnoses which included type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications (person's blood sugar levels are high, indicating diabetes, but they haven't experienced any long-term health problems like kidney disease, nerve damage, or heart disease), essential (primary) hypertension (high blood pressure where no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate dispensing and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 22 residents (Residents #13) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility did not ensure Resident #13 was given Tylenol (pain medication) 650 mg after a fall with complaints of lower back pain. This failure could place the resident at risk of not receiving medications as ordered. Findings included: Record review of Resident #13's face sheet, dated 05/27/25, reflected Resident #13 was a [AGE] year-old female, readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis which included muscle weakness, history of falling, and generalized osteoarthritis (degeneration of joint cartilage and the underlying bone). Record review of Resident #13's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 05/04/25, reflected Resident #13 made herself understood, and understood others. Resident #13's BIMS score was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure all drugs were stored in a locked compartment, only accessible by authorized personnel for 1 of 22 resident (Resident #22) reviewed for storage and labeling of medications. The facility did not ensure Resident #22's eye drops was properly secured. This failure could place residents at risk for misuse of medication, overdose, drug diversions, adverse reactions of medications, and not receiving the therapeutic benefit of medications. Findings included: Record review of Resident #22's face sheet, dated 05/27/25, reflected Resident #22 was a [AGE] year-old male, readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia (too much carbon dioxide in the bloodstream), and dry eye syndrome of bilateral lacrimal glands (tear glands). Record review of the order summary report dated 05/22/25 reflected an active physician order for Olopatadine HCl Ophthalmic Solution 0.2%: instill…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates residents' food preferences for 1 of 22 residents (Resident #10) reviewed for food preferences and the accommodation of resident's meal choices. The facility did not honor Resident #10's preference for chocolate health shake. This failure could result in a decrease in resident choices, diminished interest in meals, and weight loss. Findings included: Record review of Resident #10's face sheet, dated 05/27/25, reflected Resident #10 was a [AGE] year-old female, readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis which included diabetes mellitus without hyperglycemia (chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar) and protein-calorie malnutrition. Record review of Resident #10's annual MDS assessment, dated 04/25/25, reflected Resident #10 made herself understood, and understood others. Resident #10's BIMS score was 15, which indicated her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs and as prescribed by the physician for 1 of 22 residents (Resident #10) reviewed for therapeutic diets. The facility did not ensure Resident #10 was given double protein portion as ordered by the physician. This failure could place residents at risk for poor intake, weight loss, unmet nutritional needs, and a loss of dignity. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #10's face sheet, dated 05/27/25, reflected Resident #10 was a [AGE] year-old female, readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis which included diabetes mellitus without hyperglycemia (chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar) and protein-calorie malnutrition. Record review of Resident #10's annual MDS assessment, dated 04/25/25, reflected Resident #10 made herself understood, and understood others. Resident #10's BIMS score was 15, which indicated her cognition was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records for 1 of 22 residents (Residents #43). The facility failed to ensure the care plan was updated to reflect the discontinuation of Resident #43's fall mat. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving appropriate interventions meet their current needs. The findings include: Record review of a face sheet dated 05/21/2025 indicated Resident #43 was a [AGE] year-old female initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic kidney disease (a progressive condition where the kidneys gradually lose their ability to filter waste and excess fluid from the blood), end stage renal disease (a condition where the kidneys are no longer able to function effectively, leading to the buildup of waste and excess fluid in the body), acute respiratory failure with hypoxia ( occurs when the lungs are unable to deliver enough oxygen to the blood, leading to low oxygen levels in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — isolated
    Have policies on smoking.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish policies regarding smoking areas, and smoking safety for 1 of 1 smoking area. 1. The facility did not ensure cigarettes were not discarded in the trash can designed for the disposing of trash. 2. The facility did not ensure trash was not discarded in the red trash can designed for the disposing of cigarettes. These failures could place residents who smoke at risk of physical harm and lead to an unsafe smoking environment. Findings Included: During an observation and interview on 05/20/25 at 10:30 a.m., there was a red can with trash observed inside the can located in the designated smoking area. CNA B stated the trash observed inside the can was the foil wrapper part of the cigarette box when you first open the box. CNA B stated the wrapper should be disposed in the trash can. CNA B stated whoever took the residents out to smoke should check the red can for trash. CNA B stated this failure could potentially cause a fire. During an observation on 05/20/25 at 10:38 a.m., a cigarette butt was observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-03-27 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, including information for agency and contract staff, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data in a uniform format according to specifications established by CMS fiscal year 2024 for the first quarter (October 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023) reviewed for administration. The facility failed to transmit RN hours for: 11/18/2023, 11/19/2023, 12/02/2023, 12/03/2023, 12/16/2023, 12/17/2023, and 12/30/2023. This failure could place residents at risk for personal needs not being identified and met. Findings included: Record review of the CMS PBJ report for the first quarter of 2024 (October 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023) indicated there were no RN hours for the following dates: 11/18/23 (SA), 11/19/23 (SU), 12/02/23(SA), 12/03/23 (SU), 12/16/23 (SA), 12/17/23 (SU), and 12/30/23 (SA). Record review of the DON's punch detail report for November and December 2023 indicated RN hours on 11/18/2023, 11/19/2023, 12/02/2023,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 3 of 23 residents (Resident #63, Resident #25, and Resident #42) reviewed for comprehensive person-centered care plans. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #63's grab bar was included on the care plan. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #25's comprehensive care plan addressed that he received an anticoagulant medication and that he required the use of assist/grab bars. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #42's care plan was person-centered to include his lack of triggers and unwillingness to discuss his history of trauma. These failures could place residents at risk of unmet care needs, not receiving necessary medications, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-27 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that it was free of medication error rate of 5 percent or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 17.95 % based on 7 errors out of 39 opportunities, which involved 3 of 6 residents (Resident #'s 172, 16, and 17) reviewed for medication administration. The facility failed to ensure LVN A administered Resident #172's Levetiracetam (medication used to treat seizures) timely. The facility failed to ensure LVN A administered Resident #66's midodrine (medication to treat blood pressure), Eliquis (medication to coagulation of blood), and levothyroxine (medication for thyroid disease) timely. The facility failed to ensure MA B administered Resident #17's tramadol (medication for pain), levothyroxine (medication for thyroid disease), and Protonix (medication for gastric upset) timely. These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving therapeutic effects of their medications and possible adverse reactions. Findings…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-27 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents were free of significant medication errors for 3 of 10 residents (Resident's #172, #66, and #17) reviewed for pharmacy services. 1.The facility failed to ensure LVN A administered Resident #172's Keppra (medication used to treat seizures) timely. 2.The facility failed to ensure LVN A administered Resident #66's midodrine (medication to treat blood pressure), and Eliquis (medication to coagulation of blood timely. 3. The facility failed to ensure MA B administered Resident #17's tramadol (medication for pain), timely. This failure could place the resident at risk of medical complications and not receiving the therapeutic effects of their medications. Findings Included: 1) Record review of a face sheet dated 3/27/2024 indicated Resident #172 was an [AGE] year-old female who admitted on [DATE] with the diagnosis of high blood pressure, malnutrition, and arthritis. Record review of an admission MDS assessment dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living receives the necessary services to maintain good nutrition for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #16) reviewed for quality of life. The facility did not ensure Resident #16 was provided assistance with eating during the lunch meal on 03/25/2024. This failure could place residents at risk for decreased food intake, weight loss, and a decreased quality of life. The findings included: Record review of the face sheet, dated 03/27/2024, revealed Resident #16 was a [AGE] year-old female who initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, late onset (type of gradually progressive brain disorder that causes problems with memory, thinking, and behavior), need for assistance with personal care, and unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition (occurs when an individual does not consume sufficient protein and calories, leading to adverse effects on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their own established smoking policy for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for quality of care (Resident #3). The facility did not provide a smoking apron per their smoking assessment for Resident #3. The failure could place residents at risk of an unsafe smoking environment and burns. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 03/27/2024 indicated Resident #3 was a [AGE] year-old female originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Paranoid Schizophrenia (pattern of behavior where a person feels distrustful and suspicious of other people and act accordingly) Dementia (loss of cognitive functioning thinking, remembering, and reasoning to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life), other lack of coordination ( problems with movement). Record review of the care plan last reviewed 07/17/2023, indicated Resident #3 was a smoker and would wear a smoking apron…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's urinary (foley) catheter was properly secured to his leg. This failure could place residents with urinary catheters at risk for damage to the bladder, penis, or urethra (a hollow tube that lets urine leave your body), dislodging of the catheter, and urinary tract infections. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 03/27/2024 indicated Resident #2 was a [AGE] year-old male originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following cerebral infraction affecting the right dominant side (indicates paralysis on the right side of the body), Hemiplegia unspecified affecting left dominant side (indicates paralysis on the left side of the body),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record reviews, the facility failed to attempt to use alternatives prior to installing a side or bed rail, obtain informed consent prior to installation, ensure correct installation, use and maintenance of bedrails for 2 of 2 residents (Residents #63 and #25) reviewed for quality of care. 1. The facility failed to ensure informed consent for the use of Resident #63's bed rails were obtained prior to installation. 2. The facility failed to follow Resident #63's bed rail assessment, which did not recommend the use of bed rails. 3. The facility failed to document the attempt of alternatives used prior to installation of Resident #25's bed rails. 4. The facility failed to ensure an informed consent for the use of Resident #25's bed rails were obtained prior to installation. These failures could place residents at risk for entrapment with serious injury and even death. Findings included: 1. Record review of the face sheet, dated 03/27/2024, revealed Resident #63 was a [AGE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish a system of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable accurate reconciliation and determine that drug records were in order and that an account of all controlled drugs were maintained and periodically reconciled for 1 of 1 storage area reviewed for pharmacy services The facility failed to keep a record or receipt of controlled medications awaiting disposition to allow accurate and periodic reconciliation. This failure could place residents at risk for loss of prescribed medications, resident's safety, and drug diversion. Findings included: During an observation and interview on 03/26/2024 at 10:05 AM, the following medications were observed in the controlled medication storage cabinet with no medication log of the medications awaiting to be disposed: *Clonazepam 2 milligrams-30 RX# 501363197 *Tramadol 50 milligrams - 23 RX# 501380719 *Alprazolam 1 milligram-57 RX# 501380727 *Tramadol 50 milligrams 11 RX# 501344987 *Oxycodone 5 milligrams 58 RX# 501371736…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' drug regimen was adequately monitored and free from unnecessary drugs for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #25 and Resident #42) reviewed for pharmacy services. 1. The facility failed to monitor Resident #25 for side effects/adverse reactions for the use of Xarelto (an anticoagulant medication- blood thinner). 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #42's edema was monitored while taking furosemide. (Medication given to remove fluid and reduce swelling.) These failures could place residents at risk of swelling, bruising, and bleeding . Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #25's face sheet dated 03/26/2024, indicated a [AGE] year-old male who initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included hemiplegia (paralysis of half of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness of one entire side the body) following cerebrovascular disease (stroke) affecting left non-dominant side, diabetes mellitus (a group of diseases…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #16) reviewed for nutrition. The facility failed to ensure Resident #16 received her health shake with her lunch meal as ordered by the physician. This failure could place residents at risk for poor intake, weight loss, and unmet nutritional needs. The findings included: Record review of the face sheet, dated 03/27/2024, revealed Resident #16 was a [AGE] year-old female who initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, late onset (type of gradually progressive brain disorder that causes problems with memory, thinking, and behavior), need for assistance with personal care, and unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition (occurs when an individual does not consume sufficient protein and calories, leading to adverse effects on their health). Record review of the quarterly MDS assessment, dated 02/10/2024,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to meet resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs identified in the comprehensive assessment for 3 of 22 residents reviewed for care plans. (Resident #18, Resident #49, and Resident #51). 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #18 had a person-centered care plan to accurately reflect Resident #18's actual pressure wound. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #49 had a person-centered care plan to accurately reflect Resident #49's required one on one activities. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #51 had a person-centered care plan to accurately reflect refusal of care for ADLs. These failures could place the residents at increased risk of injury or infection and not having their individual needs met. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #18's order summary report, dated 01/24/2023, revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory care was provided with professional standards of practice for 3 of 6 residents (Residents #36, #40, and #3) reviewed for respiratory care and services. 1. The facility failed to ensure Residents #36 and #40's oxygen concentrator filters were free of grey, fuzzy material. 2. The facility failed to administer oxygen at 2 via nasal cannula as prescribed by the physician for Resident #3. These failures could place residents who receive respiratory care at risk for developing respiratory complications. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #36's order summary report, dated 01/25/2023, indicated Resident #36 was a [AGE] year-old male, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis which included COPD (chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs), chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (low levels of oxygen in your body tissues), essential hypertension (force of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-25 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the meals served met the nutritional needs of residents for 1 of 1 meals (the lunch meal), as evidenced by: The facility failed to ensure [NAME] C followed the recipe for pureeing the country fried steak and California blend vegetables. The facility failed to ensure [NAME] C used a #6 scoop to serve the country fried steak. The facility failed to ensure [NAME] C used a #12 scoop to serve the California blend vegetables. These failures could place residents at risk for weight loss, not having their nutritional needs met, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: During an observation and interview on 01/23/23 starting at 10:07 AM, [NAME] C pureed the California blend vegetables. [NAME] C poured from a pot the California blend vegetables and water from the vegetables into a canister to puree them and added salt, no measurements used. After this, [NAME] C pureed the country fried steak. [NAME] C put 2 country fried steaks in the puree canister and added beef broth without measuring. [NAME] C said…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-25 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food that was palatable and served at an appetizing temperature for 5 of 22 residents (Resident #36, Resident #41, Resident #46, Resident #50, and Resident #59) reviewed for dietary services. The facility failed to provide palatable food served at an appetizing temperature or taste to residents' who complained the food was not hot and did not taste good. This failure could place residents who ate food from the kitchen at risk of weight loss, altered nutritional status, and diminished quality of life. Findings included: During a resident interview on 01/22/2023 at 10:36 AM, Resident #50 stated the food was disgusting. Resident #50 stated the food was not hot and the gravy was too watery. During a resident interview on 01/22/2023 at 10:41 AM, Resident #59 stated the food was bland. During an interview on 01/22/23 at 10:44 AM Resident #36 stated the food was bland. During a resident interview on 01/22/2023 at 11:14 AM, Resident #46 stated the food was bland. During an interview on 01/22/23 at 11:28 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the facility's only kitchen. The facility failed to ensure: o food items were dated, labeled, and sealed appropriately. o expired food items were discarded. o the vent hood was clean. o the juice dispenser nozzle was clean. o the juice drain on the floor was clean. o the toaster was free of food debris. o the ice machine was clean. o a food cart was clean. o a fan on the floor in the kitchen was clean. o the floor was clean. These failures could place residents at risk for foodborne illness. Findings included: During an observation on 01/22/23 starting at 09:02 AM, Reach in refrigerator: 1 gallon of dill pickle relish with no open date 1 16 oz package of beef bologna with no open date Kitchen shelf: 1 11 oz container of parsley flakes use by date 12/17/22 1 18 oz container of Hungarian style paprika use by date 3/26/22 1 28 oz container…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-25 · tag F0813 — pattern
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary storage of resident's food items for 3 of 22 residents reviewed for personal food safety. (Resident #16, Resident #63, and Resident #59) The facility did not implement the personal food policy related to personal refrigerators for Resident #16, Resident #63, and Resident #59. This failure could place the residents at risk for food borne illnesses. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #16's order summary report, dated 01/25/2023, revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), osteoarthritis (degeneration of joint cartilage and the underlying bone), and type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications (chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar). Record review of the MDS assessment, dated 10/19/2023, revealed Resident #16 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for (Residents #18, Resident #4, Resident #25 and Resident #69) reviewed for infection control. 1.The facility did not ensure Resident #4 utilized appropriate PPE use throughout the facility. 2.The facility failed to ensure CMA H disinfected the wrist blood pressure monitor between Resident #25 and Resident # 69. 3.The facility failed to ensure NA K changed her gloves and performed hand hygiene during incontinent care provided to Resident #18. These failures could place residents and staff at risk for cross-contamination, spread of infection and could potentially affect all others in the building. Findings include: 1.Record review of Resident #4's face sheet (01/25/23) indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female that was admitted to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and provide care in a manner that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 2 of 22 residents (Resident #15 and Resident #49) reviewed for resident rights. 1. The facility failed to ensure NA K provided privacy for Resident #15 while providing incontinent care. 2. The facility failed to ensure NA K and CMA L treated Resident #49 with dignity and respect by referring to her as a feeder. These failures could place residents at an increased risk of embarrassment, isolation, and diminished quality of life. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #15's order summary report, dated 01/25/2023, revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance (loss of memory, language, problem solving and other thinking abilities that were severe enough to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-25 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure an accurate MDS was completed for 1 of 22 residents (Resident #43) reviewed for MDS assessment accuracy. The facility failed to accurately document Resident #43's tobacco use. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs. Findings include: Record review of Resident #43's order summary report, dated 01/25/2023, indicated Resident #43 was an [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis which included muscle wasting and atrophy (thinning or loss of muscle tissue), essential hypertension (high blood pressure), and dementia (loss of memory, language, problem solving and other thinking abilities that were severe enough to interfere with daily life). Record review of Resident #43's admission MDS assessment, dated 09/16/2022, indicated Resident #43 usually understood others and made himself understood. The assessment indicated Resident #43 was moderately cognitive impaired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 2 out of 22 residents (Resident #52 and Resident #70) reviewed for accident hazards. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #52's oxygen cylinder was securely stored. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #70 was free from an antiseptic agent containing alcohol. These failures could place residents at risk of injury. Findings included: Resident #52 Record review of the face sheet, dated 01/25/23, revealed, Resident #52 was a [AGE] year-old male initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of colon (colon cancer), malignant neoplasm of upper lobe, left bronchus or lung (lung cancer), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with (acute) exacerbation (chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs). Record review of the order recap report, dated 01/25/23, indicated Resident #52 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate dispensing and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for 1 (Resident #45) of 22 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility did not ensure Resident #45 received her Lantus Solostar Solution (diabetic medication) and blood sugar checks as ordered by the physician. This failure could place the residents at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of their medications and accidental exposure or drug diversion. Findings include: Record review of Resident #45's order summary report, dated 01/25/2023, indicated Resident #45 was an [AGE] year-old female, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis which included type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic nephropathy (chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar, progressive death of nerve fibers, which leads to deterioration of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-25 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that it was free of medication error rate of 5 percent or greater. 27 opportunities were observed with a total of 3 errors, resulting in a 11.11 percent medication error rate. Two (Residents #37 and Resident # 25) of five residents reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #37 received oxycodone-acetaminophen tablet 10/325mg to be administered at 6:00 a.m. CMA H administered the medication at 8:33 a.m. to Resident #37. The facility failed to ensure Resident #25 received Tramadol 50 mg at 6:00 a.m. and Protonix 40 mg at 6:30 a.m. The medications were administered at 8:51 a.m. These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of their medications or receiving them as prescribed, per physician orders. Findings included: 1.Record Review of Resident #37's face sheet (01/25/23) indicated he was a [AGE] year-old male that was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-25 · tag F0868 — isolated
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a quality assessment and assurance committee consisting at a minimum the required committee members for 3 of 4 meetings (November 2022, December 2022, and January 2023) reviewed for QAPI. 1. The facility did not ensure the Administrator attended their QAPI meetings in November 2022, December 2022, and January 2023. 2. The facility did not ensure the Infection Preventionist attended their QAPI meeting in December 2022 and January 2023. This failure could place residents at risk for quality deficiencies being unidentified, infections, no appropriate plans of action developed and implemented, and no appropriate guidance developed. Findings include: Record review of the facility's QAPI Committee sign-in-sheets indicated the Administrator did not sign in for their meetings from November 2022 to January 2023. Record review of the facility's QAPI Committee sign-in sheets indicated the Infection Preventionist did not sign in for their meetings from December 2022 to January 2023. During an interview on 01/25/2023 at 9:38…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-25 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's medical record included documentation that indicates the resident received education on the influenza and the pneumococcal immunizations of 2 of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations. (Resident #3 and Resident #10). 1 The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's medical record contained evidence of education on the pneumococcal immunization when the vaccine was administered to the resident. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's medical record contained evidence of education on the influenza vaccine when the vaccine was administered to the resident. The facility failed to ensure Resident #10's medical record contained evidence of education on the pneumococcal immunization when the vaccine was administered to the resident. The facility failed to ensure Resident #10's medical record contained evidence of education on the influenza vaccine when the vaccine was administered to the resident. These failures could place…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$8,162 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $8,162 — penalty dated 2024-03-07

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.2-1.2 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 341 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Aspen Health And WellnessOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Bennett Hills Rehabilitation and Care CenterGooding, ID 1 of 5Broadway By The SeaLong Beach, CA 1 of 5Chatsworth Park Health Care CenterChatsworth, CA 1 of 5Clarion Wellness and Rehabilitation CenterClarion, IA 1 of 5Colonial Manor of RandolphRandolph, NE 1 of 5Durango Health And RehabilitationDurango, CO 1 of 5Fort Dodge Health and RehabilitationFort Dodge, IA 1 of 5Greater Southside Health and RehabilitationDes Moines, IA 1 of 5Hearthstone Health And RehabilitationSparks, NV 1 of 5Heritage Gardens Rehabilitation and HealthcareCarrollton, TX 1 of 5Hillcrest Health Care CenterHawarden, IA 1 of 5Lake Village Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterLewisville, TX 1 of 5Lakeside Rehabilitation and Care CenterCoeur d'Alene, ID 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare And Rehabilitation - NorthAustin, TX 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare And Rehabilitation - WaxahaWaxahachie, TX 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare and Rehabilitation - Fort WKeller, TX 1 of 5Madera Post Acute CenterEl Monte, CA 1 of 5Medallion Post Acute RehabilitationColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Mesquite Post Acute CareLubbock, TX 1 of 5Millbrook Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterLancaster, TX 1 of 5Misty Willow Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterHouston, TX 1 of 5New Orange HillsOrange, CA 1 of 5Northeast Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Northgate PlazaIrving, TX 1 of 5Oak View Health And RehabilitationConway, SC 1 of 5Oakwood Care And RehabilitationLakewood, CO 1 of 5Omaha Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterOmaha, NE 1 of 5Onion Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterAustin, TX 1 of 5Park Manor Bee CaveBee Cave, TX 1 of 5Pelican Pointe Health And Rehabilitation CenterWindsor, CO 1 of 5Premier Care Center For Palm SpringsPalm Springs, CA 1 of 5Provo Rehabilitation and NursingProvo, UT 1 of 5Rock Canyon Respiratory And Rehabilitation CenterPueblo, CO 1 of 5Rosewood Rehabilitation CenterReno, NV 1 of 5San Marcos Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterSan Marcos, TX 1 of 5Sonterra Health CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5SouthlandNorwalk, CA 1 of 5Southland Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterLufkin, TX 1 of 5Spencer Post Acute Rehabilitation CenterSpencer, IA

Showing 40 of 341; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
FANNIN COUNTY HOSPITAL AUTHORITYOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 04/01/2017
BURNS, STEPHENIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2022
REESE, MICHAELIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2019
BURNAM, SOONIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/01/2017
KEETCH, CHADIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/01/2011
SANDERSON, CLARKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/01/2017
GRASSLAND HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2017
CARETRUST GP LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2017
CARETRUST REIT INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2017
CTR PARTNERSHIP LPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2017
ENSIGN SERVICES INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/02/2012
STILLHOUSE HEALTH HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2017

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+16.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.0M
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 59%Medicare 22%Other / private 19%

This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$305per resident / day
operating cost
$9,272per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$363per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 676190. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next