No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Legend Oaks Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center -

2003 W Hutchins Place, San Antonio, TX 78224 · For profit - Individual · 126 certified beds · (210) 927-0800 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (210) 927-0800 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 32 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
7835 I-35 S · (210) 614-4405 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
7500 Barlite Blvd · (210) 977-1860 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
8030 S Zarzamora St · (210) 923-4251 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1625 Palo Alto Rd · (210) 207-7275 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 4 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.1%15.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.1%3.0%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.4%2.4%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.6%3.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened8.5%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication13.5%18.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.0%3.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control4.1%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table1.8%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.2%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.2%88.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission32.7%25.7%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.0%12.3%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.832.171.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.922.061.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 58 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

60.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
69.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
1.03U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.45hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.42hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 69.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 63 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.03 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 97% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF60.3%CMS range 47.2–68.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.9%CMS range 6.4–14.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge69.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge74.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge66.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting91.7%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.7%CMS range 4.1–13.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.181.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.42
RN hours/ resident / day
1.24
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.96
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.62
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.50
RN hoursweekends
46.2%
Total nursing turnover
33.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 126 beds and averages 107.8 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.62 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.96 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.17 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.80 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.50 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-04)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2024-09-27)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-15 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs for 1 of 7 Residents (Resident #3) whose records were reviewed. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's call light was within reach so he could ask for help as needed. This deficient practice could result in residents not being able to ask for assistance as needed. The findings were:Record Review of Resident #3's face sheet, dated 5/15/26, revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified Dementia, generalized weakness and below the knee amputation/right lower extremity. Record Review of Resident #3's admission MDS assessment, dated 4/27/26, revealed Resident #3's BIMS score was 9 of 15 reflecting moderate cognitive impairment and he required partial/moderate assistance to total assistance with ADLs. Review of Resident #3's Care Plan, dated 4/26/26, revealed Resident #3…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-15 · tag F0573 — isolated
    Let each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to treat the decisions of a resident representative as the decisions of the resident to the extent delegated by the resident for 1 of 1 Resident (Resident #1) whose records were reviewed. The facility failed to provide Resident #1's representative with Resident #1's medical records per oral and written request. This deficient practice could result in the residents or family members not having access to medical records. The findings were:Record Review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 5/14/26, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including orthostatic hypotension (when blood pressure drops significantly upon standing from a sitting or lying position), personal history of malignant neoplasm of breast (code applies to patients who have been previously diagnosed with breast cancer, but are currently in remission or cancer free and it is not considered a current illness or injury) and acquired absence of right breast and nipple.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-15 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to respect the residents right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his or her personal and medical records including 1 of 1 Staff (OTA C) during observations of staff providing care and services. OTA C failed to lock the screen or close her laptop when she walked away from it. This deficient practice could result the resident's medical information being read by anyone walking down the hallway. The findings were:Observation and interview on 5/12/26 at 5:38 PM revealed an open laptop in the rehabilitation gym. The laptop was sitting on a table in front of a window exposed to the hallway. Anyone walking down the hall would have view of it. There were no staff in sight. Surveyor walked into the gym and called out multiple times and OTA C came out of a back office. She stated it was her laptop and was apologetic that she left it open. OTA C stated she stepped away for a minute but should not have left the screen open because it revealed protected resident information and it was a HIPAA violation if anyone else…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible in 1 of 4 halls (Hall 400) observed for a safe environment. Nursing staff failed to ensure the entrance of the oxygen storage room was not obstructed and that the full containers were separated from the empty containers. This deficient practice could result in oxygen cylinders being tipped over and result in a combustion or fire. The findings were: Observation and interview on 5/12/26 at 5:22 PM revealed the oxygen storage room was located on the 400 hall. The DON opened the door to the oxygen room, and the door immediately hit an item behind the door as soon as the DON opened the door. Observation revealed a full oxygen cylinder on a stand behind the door. There were also multiple empty oxygen stands on the left side of the room further obstructing the passage into the room. Observation revealed the DON was unable to walk freely into the storage room without moving oxygen stands out of the room and the full oxygen cylinder on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-15 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure each resident received food prepared in a form designed to meet their individual needs for 1 of 1 Resident (Resident #2) observed for a puree diet. Nursing staff failed to ensure Resident #2 received a puree diet as prescribed by his physician. On 5/12/26 he received sugar cookies with his lunch meal. This deficient practice could cause the residents to aspirate or choke and could lead to the resident's death. The findings were:Record Review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated 5/15/26, revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of dysphagia (trouble swallowing) following cerebral infarction (stroke). Record Review of Resident #2's admission MDS assessment, dated 4/27/26, revealed his BIMS score of 12 of 15 reflective of moderate cognitive impairment. Further review revealed Resident #2 had a swallowing disorder including holding food in mouth/cheeks or residual food in mouth after meals, coughing or choking during meals or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-04 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder and bowel received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 2 (Resident #13 and #126) of 3 residents reviewed for incontinence care. 1. CNA-B did not clean Resident #13's pubic area and did not open the labia and thoroughly clean the vaginal area for Resident #13 during incontinence care. 2. CNA-C did not clean Resident #126's pubic area during incontinence care. This failure could place residents who required incontinence care at risk for cross contamination and the development of urinary tract infections. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #13's face sheet, dated 12/04/2025, revealed the resident was [AGE] years old female, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], and re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of protein calorie malnutrition (a nutrition status in which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents' right to self-administer medications if the interdisciplinary team has determined that this practice is clinically appropriate for 1 of 5 residents (Residents #57) reviewed for medications. MA-D gave Resident #57's Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Suspension to the resident, and the resident sprayed the medication to each nostril by himself. However, the facility did not assess and evaluate Resident #57's ability to self-administer medications and did not obtain a physician's order for self-administration of medications. This failure could place residents at risk of inaccurate drug administration and not having appropriate therapeutic effects. The findings included: Record review of Resident #57's face sheet, dated 12/04/2025, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year old male, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], and re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of sepsis (the body responds improperly to an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident has a right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his or her personal and medical records for 1 (Resident #86) of 29 residents reviewed the privacy of medical records. LVN-A left her computer open and unattended with Resident #86's personal and medical information on the nursing cart at the 300-hallway on 12/03/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of resident identifiable and medical information being accessed by unauthorized persons. The findings were: Record review of Resident #86's face sheet, dated 12/04/2025, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year old female, originally admitted on [DATE], and re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of type 2 diabetes mellitus (the body has trouble controlling blood sugar and using it for energy), osteoporosis (bones become weak and are likely to fracture), hypothyroidism (abnormally low activity of the thyroid gland), and neuropathy (happens when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the MDS assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 resident (Resident #11) of 8 residents reviewed for MDS assessments.The facility failed to ensure Resident #11's admission 5-day MDS and Significant change MDS were coded accurately for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR). These deficient practices could affect residents who receive care and could result in missed or inappropriate care. The findings included: Record review of Resident #11's face sheet dated 12/03/2025, revealed Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: schizophrenia unspecified, bipolar disorder unspecified, and unspecified intellectual disabilities. Record review of Resident #11's admission 5-day MDS assessment, dated 02/07/2025 Section A1500 Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) coded 0 (No) for was the resident currently considered by the state level II PASRR process…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was not five percent or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 7.41% based on 2 errors out of 27 opportunities, which involved two residents (Residents #57 and #18) of five residents reviewed for medication errors. 1. MA-D gave Resident #57's Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Suspension to the resident, and the resident administered two sprays to each nostril by himself, but the physician order said, Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Suspension, 1 spray in both nostrils one time a day for allergies. 2. MA-D administered 15 ml of Resident #18's Enulose Solution 10 gm/15 ml to the resident on 12/03/2025. However, the physician order indicated Enulose Solution 10 gm/15 ml, Give 30 ml by mouth two times a day for constipation. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic benefits of their medications or not receiving them as prescribed, according to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and included the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable for 2 of 27 residents (Residents #130 and #81) reviewed for storage. 1. Resident #130's insulin Degludec Flex Pen for diabetes had no open date, found inside 100-wing nursing cart on 12/02/2025. 2. Resident #81's insulin Glargine Flex Pen for diabetes had no open date, found inside 100-wing nursing cart on 12/02/2025. These failures could place residents at risk of having no therapeutic effects by using old insulins. The findings were: 1. Record review of Resident #130's face sheet, dated 12/04/2025, revealed Resident #130 was a [AGE] year-old male and admitted to the facility 11/19/2025 with diagnoses of sepsis (the body responded improperly to an infection), Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (common lung disease…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen observed for puree diet preparation.The facility failed to ensure dietary staff preparing the puree diets used sanitary preparation procedures.These failures could place residents who received meals and/or snacks from the kitchen at risk of food born illness.The findings included: Observation on 12/03/2025 at 10:46 a.m. revealed the [NAME] using a processor to prepare the pureed pork loin. The [NAME] had the processor sitting on one side of the counter near the 2-compartment sink with a pot of pork loin next to it. The [NAME] was observed scooping out the pork loin with a large cooking spoon and placing it in the processor to puree it. After blending the pork loin, the [NAME] reached across the 2-compartment sink grabbing the plastic liquid measuring cup which was sitting on the metal counter with liquid droplets around and near it. The [NAME] then placed the measuring cup into the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain medical records that were complete and accurately documented in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 1 (Resident #16) out of 27 residents reviewed for medical records. Facility nurses did not document their initials when they administered Resident #16's oxygen via a nasal cannula as ordered on the resident's medication administration record. This failure placed residents at risk for missed treatment regarding oxygen therapy as ordered which could result in decline in healing and well-being.Findings included: Record review of Resident #16's face sheet, dated 12/04/2025, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year old female and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (a condition where the body has trouble regulating blood sugar levels, leading to persistently high blood glucose levels), protein-calorie malnutrition (a nutrition status in which reduced availability of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-27 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical and nursing needs to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 3 of 3 residents (Resident #226, Resident #221 and Resident #320) reviewed for comprehensive care plans in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #226's use of bed rails was care planned. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #221's use of bed rails was care planned. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #320's use of bed rails was care planned. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not being provided with the necessary care or services and having personalized plans developed to address their specific needs. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #226's face sheet, dated 9/26/24 revealed a [AGE] year-old male…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-27 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess the resident for risk of entrapment from bed rails prior to installation and review the risks and benefits of bed rails with the resident or resident representative and obtain informed consent prior to installation for 3 residents of 9 residents (Resident #226, Resident #221, and Resident #320) reviewed for use of side or bed rails in that: 1. The facility failed to attempt to use appropriate alternatives prior to installing a side or bed rail for Resident #226 and failed to assess Resident #226 for risk of entrapment from bed rails before they were installed. 2. The facility failed to attempt to use appropriate alternatives prior to installing a side or bed rail for Resident #221 and failed to assess Resident #221 for risk of entrapment from bed rails before they were installed. 3. The facility failed to attempt to use appropriate alternatives prior to installing a side or bed rail for Resident #320 and failed to assess Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen, in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure an opened bag of shredded cheese was stored in a sealed container in the reach-in cooler. 2. The facility failed to ensure a storage bag of cooked pork was sealed and labeled with a use-by date in the reach in cooler. 3. The facility failed to store a mop in the equipment storage closet in a position that allowed air drying. These failures could place residents who received meals and/or snacks from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness. The findings included: 1. Observation on 09/24/2024 at 9:26 AM revealed there was a 5-lb. bag of shredded cheddar cheese in the reach-in cooler. The cheese was in its original package and placed in a clear, gallon-sized storage bag with a zipper-seal. The package of cheese had been opened and the zipper-sealed bag was also open. During an interview on 09/24/2024 at 9:27 AM the DS stated the zipper-sealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' right to formulate an advance directive for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #320) reviewed for advanced directives, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #320's Out-of-Hospital Do Not Resuscitate (OOH DNR) was included in the medical record and correctly completed. This failure could place residents at-risk of having their end of life wishes dishonored, and of having CPR performed against their wishes. The findings included: Record review of Resident #320's face sheet, dated [DATE] revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia (a group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking, and interferes with daily life), Parkinson's disease (a movement disorder that affects the nervous system and worsens over time) without dyskinesia (uncontrolled, involuntary movements of the face, arms, and legs) without mention of fluctuations, and adult failure to thrive. Record review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder receives appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #77, and #312) reviewed for indwelling urinary catheter care. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #77's indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag was emptied and draining to gravity when provided with urinary catheter care. 2.The facility failed to ensure CNA C cleansed Resident #312 from the meatus (the opening of the urethra where urine exits the penis) outwards and washed the resident's scrotum, inner thighs, and thoroughly cleaned between his buttocks. These failures could place the residents with indwelling urinary catheter devices at risk for the development of new or worsening urinary tract infections. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #77's face sheet, dated 9/27/24 revealed a [AGE] year-old male…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who required dialysis received such services, consistent with professional standards of practice for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #226, and Resident #75) reviewed for dialysis in that: The facility did not maintain communication, coordination, and collaboration with the dialysis facility for Resident #226 and Resident #75. This deficient practice could affect residents who received dialysis treatments and place them at risk for complications and not receiving proper care and treatment to meet their needs. The findings were: 1. Record review of Resident #226's face sheet, dated 9/26/24 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included displacement of vascular dialysis catheter (a medical device used to access the bloodstream for dialysis treatment), end stage renal disease (condition in which the kidneys cease functioning on a permanent basis) and dependence on renal dialysis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to collaborate with hospice representatives and coordinate the hospice care planning process for each resident receiving hospice services, to ensure quality of care for the resident, ensuring communication with the hospice medical director, the resident's attending physician, and others participating in the provision of care for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #320) reviewed for hospice services, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #138's most recent plan of care (POC), DNR, and hospice physician orders were available and at the facility. This deficient practice could place residents who receive hospice services at-risk of receiving inadequate end-of-life care due to a lack of documentation, coordination of care and communication of resident needs. The findings were: Record review of Resident #320's face sheet, dated [DATE] revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia (a group of symptoms…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 2 of 3 residents (Residents #77 and #312) reviewed for infection control, in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA B used appropriate hand hygiene when removing her gloves after assisting Resident #77 with indwelling urinary catheter care. 2. The facility failed to ensure staff did not let Resident #312's catheter tubing touch the floor and used enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) when caring for the catheter and the resident. These deficient practices could place residents at-risk for infection due to improper care practices. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #77's face sheet, dated 9/27/24 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-22 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — pattern
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assist residents in obtaining routine dental services to meet the needs of 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for dental services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's missing dentures were replaced. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving needed dental care, difficulty eating, a decreased quality of life, weight loss, and discomfort. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 03/22/2024 indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included surgical wound, pleural effusion (extra fluid around the lungs), atrial fibrillation, chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, and adult failure to thrive. Record review of Resident #1's discharge MDS, dated [DATE], showed Resident #1's cognition was intact. Record review of Resident #1's care plan, close date 10/02/2023, revealed, the resident's dentures were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs for 2 of 8 residents (Residents #1 and #2) reviewed for care plans in that: Resident #1's and Resident #2's comprehensive care plan did not reflect they had dentures. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving inadequate interventions not individualized to their care needs. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 03/22/2024 revealed a [AGE] year-old female initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included surgical wound, pleural effusion (extra fluid around the lungs), atrial fibrillation, chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, and adult failure to thrive. Record review of Resident #1's discharge MDS, dated [DATE], showed Resident #1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen, in that: 1. There was a zipper-sealed bag in the reach in cooler filled with cut lettuce leaves that were brown. 2. There was a clear plastic storage container of food thickener in the dry storage room that was not properly sealed. These failures could place residents who received meals and/or snacks from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness. The findings included: 1. Observation on 07/25/2023 at 2:55 p.m. in the reach in cooler revealed a zipper-sealed bag that was filled with cut Romaine lettuce leaves. Most of the lettuce leaves had brown parts and there was a green slimy substance at the bottom of the bag indicating some of the lettuce was in a rotten state. There was a label on the bag that read, 7/10. During an interview on 07/25/2023 at 2:56 p.m. with the DS, she stated the date on the lettuce bag was the date it was stored in the cooler. The DS agreed that the bag of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-28 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of resident needs for 2 of 10 residents reviewed for call light: (Resident # 24 and Resident # 158). 1. Resident # 24 call light was not placed within reach. 2. Nursing staff failed to ensure Resident #158's call light was placed within reach. This failure could place residents who used call lights for assistance at risk in maintaining and/or achieving independent functioning, dignity, and well-being. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident's # 24 face sheet dated 7/27/23 revealed a [AGE] year-old female, admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: [Type 2 diabetes] condition in which your cells don't normally respond to insulin,[Heart Failure] condition in which heart muscle doesn't pump blood as well as it should and [Kidney dialysis Dependence] the process of removing excess water, solutes, and toxins from the blood in people whose kidneys can no longer perform…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-28 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to conduct initially a comprehensive standardized reproducible assessment of each resident's functional capacity within 14 calendar days after admission for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #157) reviewed for comprehensive assessments. The facility failed to ensure Resident #157's comprehensive assessment was completed within 14 days. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not having their needs met as needed. The findings were: Review of Resident #157's face sheet, dated 7/27/23, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Hypertensive Urgency and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without complications. Review of Resident #157's admission MDS assessment revealed it was completed on 7/27/23 revealed her BIMS was 3 out of 15 indicative of severe cognitive impairment. Interview on 07/28/23 at 11:39 AM the MDS Coordinator revealed a resident MDS assessment should be completed 14 days after admission. He stated Resident #157…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed within 7 days after the completion of the comprehensive assessment and failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment; there was an update for 2 of 21 residents (Resident # 13 & #157) whose care plan was reviewed, in that: 1. The facility failed to update Resident #13's care plan when he started Depakote on 2/14/23. 2. The facility failed to develop Resident #157's comprehensive care plan within the required time frame. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of receiving incorrect care and cause health complications with subsequent illness. The findings were: 1. Record review of Resident #13's face sheet dated 7/26/2023 revealed the resident was an 86- year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included: [Type 2 diabetes] condition in which your cells don't normally respond to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident received assistive devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #157) reviewed for falls. The facility failed to ensure nursing staff used a gait belt when providing Resident #157 with assistance during a transfer. This deficient practice could place any resident who required assistance with transfers at risk for avoidable falls. The findings were: Review of Resident #157's face sheet, dated 7/27/23, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Acute Kidney Failure, Dehydration and unspecified Dementia (range of conditions that affect the brain's ability to think, remember, and function normally). Review of Resident #157's admission MDS assessment, dated 7/27/23, revealed her BIMS was 3 out of 15 indicative of severe cognitive impairment, she required limited assistance by 1 person for transfers, was not steady and only able to stabilize and she had a fall in the last month…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care and services, including oxygen administration was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #52) reviewed for respiratory therapy in that: The facility did not obtain a signed physician's order prior to providing oxygen therapy for Resident #52. This deficient practice could affect residents who received oxygen therapy and could result in incorrect oxygen support and an increase in respiratory complications. The findings were: Record review of Resident #52's face sheet, dated 07/27/2023, revealed an original admission date of 12/02/2022, and current admission of 03/08/2023 with diagnoses that included: senile degeneration of brain (progressive loss of memory, mental abilities, and personality changes), malignant neoplasm of colon (colon cancer), Crohn's disease (chronic bowel disease that causes inflammation and irritation in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-28 · tag F0712 — isolated
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were seen by a physician at least once every 30 days for the first 90 days after admission for 1 of 6 residents (Residents #51) whose care was reviewed. Physician K did not conduct an initial visit with Resident #151 within the first 30 days after admission. This deficient practice could place any newly admitted residents at risk for not having their physician visit completed in a timely manner and could lead to a decline in health status or untreated conditions. The findings were: Review of Resident #151's face sheet, dated 7/28/23, revealed her admission date was 7/17/23 with diagnoses including Hypertensive Urgency and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without complications. Further review revealed Resident #151 was skilled with QHS (Quaque [NAME] somni) waiver (a temporary exemption from a 3-day hospitalization prior to a skilled stay) and had part A (Provides inpatient/hospital coverage, skilled nursing, and hospice services), B (Provides…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2026-05-15 · tag F0577 — pattern
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were able to examine the results of the most recent survey of the facility conducted by Federal or State surveyors and any plan of correction in effect with respect to the facility for 1 of 4 days (May 12, 2026) observed for survey results. The Administration failed to include the most recent survey results in the survey binder located in the lobby. This deficient practice could result in residents being denied reading the most current survey results. The findings were: Observation on 5/12/26 at 2:30 PM revealed the last survey results in the survey binder located in the lobby were dated 11/14/25. Interview on 5/12/26 at 2:40 PM with the ADM revealed the last survey results in the survey binder located in the lobby were dated 11/14/25. The ADM stated he thought he had included the most recent survey results from December 2025. He stated the residents and family members had the right to read the results and ask questions. The ADM stated it was their right and failure to post violated their right…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2026-05-15 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — pattern
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure a resident who was fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding including but not limited to aspiration pneumonia, diarrhea, vomiting, dehydration, metabolic abnormalities, and nasal-pharyngeal ulcers from 1 of 1 nutrition room observed for stored enteral feedings. The facility failed to ensure one box of Glucerna 1.2 containing 6 quart containers of enteral feedings did not exceed the expiration date and were removed from the nutrition room. This deficient practice could lead to residents receiving expired feedings and result in health complications. The findings were:Observation and interview on [DATE] at 3:40 PM in the nutrition room revealed 6 quarts of Glucerna 1.2 dated [DATE]; they were expired. The DON stated the Glucerna feedings were expired. The DON stated the staff in charge of central supply or any nursing staff member should have removed to formula because it could…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 53.2-0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.8+0.2 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 341 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Aspen Health And WellnessOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Bennett Hills Rehabilitation and Care CenterGooding, ID 1 of 5Broadway By The SeaLong Beach, CA 1 of 5Chatsworth Park Health Care CenterChatsworth, CA 1 of 5Clarion Wellness and Rehabilitation CenterClarion, IA 1 of 5Colonial Manor of RandolphRandolph, NE 1 of 5Durango Health And RehabilitationDurango, CO 1 of 5Fort Dodge Health and RehabilitationFort Dodge, IA 1 of 5Greater Southside Health and RehabilitationDes Moines, IA 1 of 5Hearthstone Health And RehabilitationSparks, NV 1 of 5Heritage Gardens Rehabilitation and HealthcareCarrollton, TX 1 of 5Hillcrest Health Care CenterHawarden, IA 1 of 5Lake Village Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterLewisville, TX 1 of 5Lakeside Rehabilitation and Care CenterCoeur d'Alene, ID 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare And Rehabilitation - NorthAustin, TX 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare And Rehabilitation - WaxahaWaxahachie, TX 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare and Rehabilitation - Fort WKeller, TX 1 of 5Madera Post Acute CenterEl Monte, CA 1 of 5Medallion Post Acute RehabilitationColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Mesquite Post Acute CareLubbock, TX 1 of 5Millbrook Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterLancaster, TX 1 of 5Misty Willow Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterHouston, TX 1 of 5New Orange HillsOrange, CA 1 of 5Northeast Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Northgate PlazaIrving, TX 1 of 5Oak View Health And RehabilitationConway, SC 1 of 5Oakwood Care And RehabilitationLakewood, CO 1 of 5Omaha Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterOmaha, NE 1 of 5Onion Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterAustin, TX 1 of 5Park Manor Bee CaveBee Cave, TX 1 of 5Pelican Pointe Health And Rehabilitation CenterWindsor, CO 1 of 5Premier Care Center For Palm SpringsPalm Springs, CA 1 of 5Provo Rehabilitation and NursingProvo, UT 1 of 5Rock Canyon Respiratory And Rehabilitation CenterPueblo, CO 1 of 5Rosewood Rehabilitation CenterReno, NV 1 of 5San Marcos Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterSan Marcos, TX 1 of 5Sonterra Health CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5SouthlandNorwalk, CA 1 of 5Southland Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterLufkin, TX 1 of 5Spencer Post Acute Rehabilitation CenterSpencer, IA

Showing 40 of 341; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
MARTINEZ, FERNANDOIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/16/2017
YAMSANI, PRADEEPIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/30/2019
ALEXANDER, ALMAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 05/27/2020
BURNAM, SOONIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/01/2017
KEETCH, CHADIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/01/2011
HUTCHINS HEALTHCARE INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2017
ENSIGN SERVICES INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2016
NATIONAL HEALTH INVESTORS, INC.OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2017
TEXAS NHI INVESTORS, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2017

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+12.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.3M
Related-party expense10% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 56%Medicare 8%Other / private 36%

This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$309per resident / day
operating cost
$9,383per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$352per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 676113. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next