Pecan Valley Rehabilitation And Healthcare

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 84 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 53.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 49 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.59 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 88% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 124 beds and averages 104.3 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.41 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.31 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.98 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.72 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.70 on weekdays — 27% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.36 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-07-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents and hazards: The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's environment was free of choking hazards when Resident #1 expired on 6/24/2025 as a result of asphyxiation by choking[PH1] [SA2] . An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified as past non-compliance on 7/07/2025. The Noncompliance began on 6/24/2025 and ended on 6/25/2025. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could place residents at risk of harm or injury and contribute to avoidable accidents and a decline in health and or death. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 6/24/2025 revealed a 72- year-old female admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: unspecified dementia unspecified severity without behavioral disturbance, psychotic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 2 of 3 residents (Residents #1 and #2) reviewed for pharmacy services. 1.The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's prescribed medications of Insulin Glargine Subcutaneous Solution and NovoLOG Injection Solution 100 UNIT/ML were administered according to physician orders for the months of February 2026 - April 2026.2.The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's prescribed medications of Insulin Glargine and NovoLOG FlexPen Subcutaneous were administered according to physician orders for the month of April 2026. These failures could place residents at risk of inaccurate drug administration and not having appropriate therapeutic effects.The findings included:1. Record review of Resident #1's admission Record dated 04/28/2026 revealed a [AGE] year-old male…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records that were complete and accurately documented in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 2 of 3 residents (Residents #1 and #2) reviewed for medical records. 1.The facility failed to maintain progress notes and documentation of notification to physician when medication errors were identified for Resident #1's prescribed medications, Insulin Glargine Subcutaneous Solution and NovoLOG Injection Solution 100 UNIT/ML for the months April 2026.2.The facility failed to maintain progress notes and documentation of notification to physician and management team when medication errors were identified for Resident #2's prescribed medications, Insulin Glargine and NovoLOG FlexPen Subcutaneous for the month of April 2026. These failures placed residents at risk for missed treatment and medications which could result in decline in health and well-being.The findings included: 1. Resident Record review of Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct an initial comprehensive, accurate, standardized, reproducible assessment of each resident's functional capacity for one of 32 residents (Resident #45) reviewed for comprehensive assessments.The facility failed to complete and transmit an admission assessment for Resident #45 within 14 days of the resident's admission.This failure placed residents at risk of not having their needs, strengths, goals, life history and preferences assessed to ensure they received appropriate care.The findings included:Record review of Resident #45's electronic face sheet dated 01/28/2026 revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including open would on lower left leg, Type 2 diabetes with hyperglycemia (high blood sugar levels), bipolar disorder (a mental health condition that causes extreme mood swings) and morbid obesity (an excess of 80 to 100 pounds above ideal body weight). No previous admission date…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure an encoded, accurate and complete discharge MDS was electronically completed and transmitted to the CMS System within 14 days after completion for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #20) reviewed for discharge MDS assessments.The facility failed to ensure a discharge MDS was completed and transmitted for Resident #20's within 14 days of his discharge to the hospital.This failure could place residents at risk of not having assessments completed and submitted in a timely manner as required.The findings included:Record review of Resident #20's electronic face sheet, accessed on 01/27/2026, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included epilepsy (seizures), Type II diabetes (a problem in the way the body regulates and uses blood sugar), acute respiratory failure (a life-threatening condition that occurs when fluid leaks from small blood vessels in the lungs and builds up in the air sacs) and cerebral…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or prevent further decrease in range of motion for one resident (Resident #53) reviewed for range of motion. The facility failed to ensure Resident #53's right hand splint (medical device used to treat hand contractures, permanent tightening of the muscles, tendons, skin and surrounding tissues that causes stiffness, placed in the hands to help improve range of motion) was in place to her right hand. This failure could place the resident at risk for decrease in mobility and range of motion and contribute to worsening of contractures. Record review of Resident #53's Face Sheet dated 01/29/26, documented a [AGE] year-old female originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with her last admission date of 07/30/25. Resident #53's diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0813 — isolated
  Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the safe and sanitary storage of residents' food items in 1 of 5 residents' refrigerators reviewed. The personal refrigerator in the resident's room [ROOM NUMBER]A contained unlabeled, undated food items. This failure could place residents at risk of foodborne illness from consuming spoiled food. The findings were: Observations on 1/27/2026 at 9:35 a.m. revealed that the personal refrigerator in RM [ROOM NUMBER] A contained cooked beef and white pasta in an unlabeled, undated storage container. Further observations on 1/27/2026 at 11:30 a.m. of the personal refrigerator in RM [ROOM NUMBER] A revealed that the cooked beef and white pasta in an unlabeled, undated storage container were still present. An interview with Resident # 104 on 01/27/2026 at 9:40 a.m. revealed that she could not recall how long the cooked beef and white pasta had been in her personal refrigerator, but recalls that her daughter, who visits often, leaves…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors to ensure safe and sanitary storage, handling, and consumption for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for sanitation. The facility failed to ensure the Dietary Manager used hair restraints properly while working in the kitchen. This failure could place residents who received meals or snacks from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness.The findings included: During an observation of the facility kitchen on 10/14/25 at 11:30 AM, the Dietary Manager (DM) was observed wearing a hair restraint over only part of her hair during meal preparation. The dietary manager wore a hair restraint over her ponytail but did not have a hair restraint covering the rest of her head. During an interview with the DM on 10/14/25 at 11:35 AM, the DM stated her expectation is for staff to always be wearing hair restraints in the kitchen. The DM further stated it was important for hair to be completely covered to ensure no hair gets in the food being…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-09 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the residents had the right to voice grievances to include those with respect to care and treatment which has been furnished as well as that which has not been furnished, the behavior of staff and of other residents, and other concerns regarding their LTC facility stay, for 2 of 8 residents (Residents #1 and #2) reviewed for grievances. On 11/9/2024 Resident #1 made a grievance to Medication Aide A (MA A) which she did not document or report to the DON. The grievance alleged he did not receive medications on 11/8/2024. On 11/19/2024 Resident #2 made a grievance to Case Manager D (CM D) which she did not document or report to the DON. Resident #2 alleged he was left at the doctor's office for hours without return home transportation. These failures could place residents at risk for harm by leaving residents with frustration and demoralization. The findings included: 1. A record review of Resident #1's admission record dated 5/7/2025 revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatments and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the residents' choices for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for quality of care. Resident #3 had a cardiology appointment on 11/13/2024, for an echocardiogram (an exam which uses sound waves to make pictures of the heart), and the facility failed to attempt to provide a chaperone to the appointment when her representative was late; subsequently Resident #3 missed her appointment. This failure could place residents at risk for decreased quality of care due to delayed health status reports to the physicians. The findings included: A record review of Resident #3's admission record dated 5/7/2025 revealed Resident #3 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted [DATE] with diagnoses which included heart failure, cardiomegaly (enlarged heart), and need for assistance with personal care. A record review of Resident #3's physicians order dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that were complete and accurately documented for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for resident records. The facility failed to ensure the wound administration records (WAR) for Resident #3 accurately reflected the wound care that was provided to her sacrum (large triangular bone at base of the spine) wound and ischium (the curved bone forming the base of the pelvis) wound on 5 different treatment days in November and December 2024. This failure could put residents at risk of inaccurate documentation. The findings were: Record review of Resident #3's admission Record (face sheet), dated 02/12/2025, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included End Stage Renal Disease (kidney failure), high blood pressure, diabetes (long-term condition in which the blood sugar level is too high which can result in damage to many of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 70% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX