The Chateau Waco

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 56 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 25.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.52 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 82% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 123 beds and averages 67.5 residents a day — about 55% occupied, or roughly 56 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.481 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.31 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.95 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.70 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.40 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 74% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-09-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents are free of any significant medication errors for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for significant medication errors in that Resident #1 's hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] stated Stop taking Valacyclovir 1000mg. Resident #1 received 5 doses of Valacyclovir 1000mg after the medication had been discontinued, resulting in readmission to the hospital for altered mental status and metabolic encephalopathy due to Valacyclovir toxicity. The resident had been prescribed Valacyclovir for HSV Opthalmicus (infection of the eye by Herpes Simplex Virus). The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) began on 09/20/2025 and ended on 09/22/2025. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the investigation began. This failure could place residents at risk of serious outcomes such as overdose or death.Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet reflected the resident was a [AGE]…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible and each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for accidents, hazards, and supervision, in that: The facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent injury for an incident that occurred on on 08/09/2025 at 4:30PM in the Dining Room, Resident #4 was attempting to get a cup of coffee. The cup overflowed and spilled coffee in Resident #4's lap and resulted in urns with 3 blisters to the left upper thigh. The facility failed to take the temperature of the coffee and keep temperature logs of the coffee. The facility failed to assess other residents for hot liquids An (IJ) Immediate Jeopardy was identified on 08/26/2025. The IJ template was provided to the ADM on 08/26/2025 at 7:28PM. While the IJ was removed on 8/28/2025, the facility remained out of compliance…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately notify the resident's representative(s) when there was a significant change in the resident's physical status for one (Resident #1) of ten residents reviewed for changes in condition. The facility failed to notify the CHF clinic or the MD of Resident #1's weight gain per providers orders. On 3/7/25 Resident #1 exhibited signs of shortness of breath and required IV Lasix a diuretic (medication used to reduce extra fluid in the body, also known as edema, caused by heart failure) to be administered on her visit to the CHF clinic 03/07/25 for a greater than 10-pound weight gain in a week from 02/27/25 to 03/07/25. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 03/19/25. The Administrator was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy and provided with the IJ Template on 03/19/25 at 05:36 PM. While the Administrator and DON were notified that the IJ was removed on 03/20/25 at 06:10 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for 1 of 10 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to notify the CHF clinic of Resident #1's weight gain per providers orders. On 3/7/25 Resident #1 exhibited signs of shortness of breath and required IV Lasix a diuretic (medication used to reduce extra fluid in the body, also known as edema, caused by heart failure) to be administered on her visit to the CHF clinic 03/07/25 for a greater than 10-pound weight gain in a week from 02/27/25 to 03/07/25. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 03/19/25. The Administrator was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy and provided with the IJ Template on 03/19/25 at 05:36 PM. While the Administrator and DON were notified that the IJ was removed on 03/20/25 at 06:10 PM, the facility remained out of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice and the resident's goals and preferences for 1 of 6 residents (Resident#1) reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to supply oxygen to Resident #1 while she was out on pass to a medical clinic appointment on 02/13/2025 and 02/21/25 resulting in increased shortness of breath, anxiety, and an inability to breath. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 2/25/25 at 6:07 p.m. The IJ template was provided on 02/25/2027 at 6:07PM. While the IJ was removed on 2/27/25, the facility remained out of compliance at actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy with a scope identified as isolated due to the facility's need to complete in-service training and evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. These failures placed residents on continuous oxygen at risk of experiencing desaturation,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-11-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure each resident receives adequate supervision with assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received assistance, in an appropriately sized space, while being lifted out of her wheelchair using a mechanical lift, as specified in the care plan. CNA B did not ensure Resident #1 was positioned in the center of the lift sling and CNA D failed to stay by Resident #1's side with hand on assistance. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 11/4/24 and ended on 11/23/24 The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could place residents at risk of injuries, falls, and a decline in quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated undated reflected; Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1's diagnoses included fracture…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for sanitation. The facility failed to properly discard dented/damaged cans and take them out of use for resident consumption. This failure could place residents at risk of foodborne contamination.Findings included: In an interview and observation on 03/17/2026 at 9:19 AM, with [NAME] A, she stated that she had just returned to work on 03/16/2026 from extended leave. She stated the previous DM was no longer employed at the facility upon her return. When the surveyor asked where the dented cans were kept, [NAME] A pointed to a large array of cans, sitting on a lower shelf under the food preparation table, some with visible dents. She stated that the previous DM had instructed the cooks to use the dented cans first, and the cans were not sent back with the supplier or discarded.In an interview on 03/17/2026 at 12:45 PM, with [NAME] B, she stated she had not been working at the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to a dignified existence for 1 of 16 (Resident #39) residents reviewed.The facility failed to treat Resident #39 with dignity and respect when MA F had called her little girl and asked, what is wrong with you?.This failure could place residents at risk for psychosocial harm and isolation.Findings Included:Record review of Resident #39's face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old woman who admitted to the facility on [DATE], who had diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a progressive, incurable lung disease), hyperlipidemia (common condition characterized by high levels of lipids), cerebral infarction (a serious medical emergency where blood flow to part of the brain is blocked, causing tissue death due to lack of oxygen) and major depressive disorder (serious, common mood disorder characterized by persistent sadness, loss of interest and low energy lasting at least two weeks).RR of Resident #39's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #69) observed for infection prevention.The facility failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) were followed when CNA C and CNA D performed catheter and peri care for Resident #69.This deficient practice could place residents at risk for the spread of infection.Findings Included: Record review of Resident #69's face sheet revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included: Type II Diabetes, Vascular dementia (decreased blood flow to areas of your brain), Respiratory disorders and diseases, Hypertension (high blood pressure), Sleep Apnea (common condition where breathing stops and starts again), Uninhibited Neuropathic Bladder (frequent…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, medical records were maintained on each resident that were complete and accurately documented for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) for complete and accurate records. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's wound treatment for sacrum(base of spine that forms the posterior wall of the pelvis), coccyx(tailbone), left hip, left distial(further from the center of the body) medial(closer to the midline of the body) foot ,and left lateral(away from midline of the body) foot was documented in Matrix on January 10th and January 12th. This failure could place residents at risk for the possibility of not verifying the needed care and services to meet their needs.Findings include:A record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 01/23/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1's had diagnoses which included essential (primary) hypertension…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately notify the resident's physician following an incident that occurred on 08/09/2025 at 4:30PM in the Dining Room, when Resident #4 was attempting to get a cup of coffee. The cup overflowed and spilled coffee in Resident #4s lap, resulting in Resident #4 sustaining 3 blisters to the left upper thigh. The facility failed to notify Resident #4's physician when he sustained burns from hot coffee, he spilled in his lap. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not receiving adequate and timely intervention. The findings include: Record review of Resident #4's undated Face Sheet reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Cerebral Infarction, unspecified (brain tissue death caused by a blocked artery supplying blood to the brain, leading to a lack of oxygen and nutrients) and Hemiplegia (the total or severe loss of motor function on one side of the body, resulting in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-30 · tag F0627 — isolated
  Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to permit Resident #1 to remain in the facility and failed to document the reason or notice of the discharge in the resident's medical record or implement policies to allow the resident to return to the facility upon discharge from the hospital for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for discharges (Resident #1).The facility failed to allow Resident #1 to return to the facility after his hospitalization. The facility failed to appropriately notify the resident, his representative, and the Long-term Care Ombudsman in writing of the discharge. This failure placed residents at risk of an extended, unnecessary hospitalization and a traumatic psychosocial adjustment to a new facility. Record review of Resident #1's undated face sheet, revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted [DATE] and discharged [DATE] at 04:15 PM. The face sheet revealed his diagnoses were Metabolic Encephalopathy (brain function disrupted due to chemical imbalances), Gastric Reflux (acid from…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-01 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to incorporate the recommendations from the PASARR level II determination and the PASARR evaluation report into a resident's assessment, care planning, and transitions of care for one (Resident #2) of 3 residents reviewed for PASARR services. The facility failed to submit a NFSS request within 20 days of the IDT meeting that was held on 2/4/2025 and failed to resubmit a NFSS request when it was initially denied ensuring the request was approved for specialized services for PASARR for Resident #1. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the needed care and services to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings included:Resident #2 face sheet dated 6/30/2025 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Schizoaffective disorder, depressive type (mental health condition), Major Depressive Disorder with psychotic features (mental health disorder…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan to meet the medical and nursing needs and the services to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of 1 (Resident #1) of 6 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to complete an accurate comprehensive care plan for Resident #1, by not care planning her required need for oxygen, monitoring her for shortness of breath related to her disease process of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary. The facility failed to complete an accurate comprehensive care plan for Resident #1, by not care planning her required need for specialty medical appointment related to her disease process of Congestive Heart Failure. The facility failed to complete an accurate comprehensive care plan for Resident #1, by not care planning her need for substantial/maximal assistance with her Activities of Daily Living including showering, upper and lower body dressing,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for three (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) of six residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to weigh Residents #1, #2, and #3 according to physician orders. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving necessary medical care, harm, and hospitalization. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's undated face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including congestive heart failure, edema (swelling), hypertension (high blood pressure), and type II diabetes. Review of Resident #1's admission MDS, dated [DATE], reflected a BIMS score of 14, indicating no cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #1's admission care plan, dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who needed respiratory care were provided with such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for three (Resident #2, Resident #4, and Resident #6) of six residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to: - Ensure Resident #2 had an order for oxygen therapy or had an Oxygen in Use sign on the door to his room. - Ensure Residents #4's oxygen tubing not in use was bagged and off the floor of their room. - Ensure Resident #4 was not eating lunch in the dining room utilizing oxygen with an empty oxygen tank. - Ensure Resident #6's nasal cannula tubing was connected to the concentrator and water was in the cannister. These deficient practices could place residents that receive oxygen therapy at risk for inadequate care and respiratory infection. Findings Included: Review of Resident #2's undated face sheet reflected an [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$72,056 in federal fines across 4 penalties.

• $16,149 — penalty dated 2025-09-26
• $16,149 — penalty dated 2025-08-28
• $25,325 — penalty dated 2025-02-27
• $14,433 — penalty dated 2024-11-24

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX