Cedar Health and Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 90 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 66.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 47 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.53 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 83% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 71.9 residents a day — about 60% occupied, or roughly 48 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.97 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.75 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.42 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.55 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.14 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.89 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-06-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined for 5 out of 41 sampled residents, that the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible; and that each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents. Specifically, 5 residents had multiple falls without continued attempts at interventions to prevent additional falls. Additionally, one resident had repeated accidents while operating his motorized wheelchair and had been assessed as not safe to operate the motorized wheelchair. Resident identifiers: 1, 39, 43, 53, and 62.Findings included:1. Resident 53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included palliative care, anxiety disorder, and Alzheimer's disease. On 6/23/25 at 8:01 AM, an observation was made of resident 53. Resident 53 was wandering in the dining room and hallway with one non-slip grip sock on her foot and one on her hand. Resident 53's medical record was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, for 6 of 41 sampled residents, the facility did not develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified. Specifically, after residents sustained falls there were no interventions or the interventions were reused and a resident did not have hospice services care planned. Resident identifiers: 1, 39, 43, 53, 62 and 64.Findings include: 1. Resident 53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included palliative care, anxiety disorder, and Alzheimer's disease. On 6/23/25 at 8:01 AM, an observation was made of resident 53. Resident 53 was wandering in the dining room and hallway with one non-slip grip sock on her foot and one on her hand. Resident 53's medical record was reviewed 6/22/25 through 6/26/25. An admission Minimum Data Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-26 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, for 5 of 41 residents, the facility did not provide food prepared by methods that conserve flavor and appearance or provide food and drink that was palatable, attractive, and at an appetizing temperature. Specifically, residents complained of cold food and too much processed food. Resident Identifiers: 6, 9, 15, 33, and 75.Findings Included:On 6/22/25 at 2:17 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 33 who stated he had received a cold hamburger with beef that tasted like fake meat. Resident 33 stated it tasted like it had been mixed with something. Resident 33 stated he had provided feedback to the kitchen staff, but it did not seem to help. Resident 33 stated he would eat lunch, but would not eat breakfast or dinner. Resident 33 stated if he wanted something to eat he could ask for a quesadilla. On 6/22/25 at 3:18 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 6. Resident 6 stated that the food was not that great. Resident 6 stated that the food was not always served warm when the food items should be warm. On 6/23/25 at 9:33…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility did not store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, food items in the walk-in freezer and the walk-in refrigerator were open to the air.Findings included:On 6/22/25 at 1:03 PM, an initial walk-through was conducted in the kitchen. In the walk-in freezer, a package of diced chicken was open to air and a box of ground beef patties were open to air.On 6/25/25 at 1:31 PM, a second walk-through was conducted in the kitchen. In the walk-in refrigerator, a box of raw bacon with a written date of 6/16/25 was open to air. [Note: The box stated store at 0 degrees, keep frozen or below.]On 6/25/25 at 2:06 PM, an interview was conducted with the Dietary Manager (DM). The DM stated the Consultant Dietitian came to the facility every 2 weeks. The DM stated while at the facility, the consultant dietitian completed a kitchen audit that included sanitation, inspection of the refrigerators and freezers for expired food and food safety issues. The DM stated she received an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined for 2 of 41 sampled residents, the facility failed to promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice, including the right to choose activities and schedules, and to make choices about aspects of his or her life in the facility that are significant to the resident. Specifically, two residents who were assessed as independent smokers were not allowed to smoke at night. Resident identifiers: 6 and 15.Findings included:1. Resident 15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included acute and chronic respiratory failure, cerebral infarction, bipolar disorder, hypertension, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder.On 6/23/25 at 9:17 AM, an observation of resident 15 was made. Resident 15 was outside in the smoking area, no staff or other residents were present. Resident 15 was vaping and was not wearing oxygen.Resident 15's medical record was reviewed 6/22/25 through…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 41 sampled residents, that the facility did not consult with the resident's physician when there was a significant change in the resident physical status, or a need to alter treatment. Specifically, the resident reported breaking his tooth after sustaining a fall and the injury was not reported to the physician. Resident identifier: 39.Findings included:Resident 39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which consisted of traumatic brain injury, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, esophagitis with bleeding, and chronic pain. On 6/22/25 at 2:03 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 39. Resident 39 stated that he fell and knocked his tooth out during the fall. Resident 39 stated that he was sleeping prior to the fall. Resident 39's medical records were reviewed.On 7/8/24 at 4:50 PM, resident 39's progress note documented, Resident brought part of his tooth in a container to nurse this morning. Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 out of 41 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events resulted in serious bodily injury to the administrator, State Survey Agency (SSA) and Adult Protective Services (APS). Specifically, a resident reported a broken tooth to the staff and the SSA and APS were not notified of the injury of unknown source. Resident identifier: 39.Findings included:Resident 39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which consisted of traumatic brain injury, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, esophagitis with bleeding, and chronic pain. On 6/22/25 at 2:03 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 39. Resident 39 stated that he fell and knocked his tooth out during the fall. Resident 39 stated that he was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined, for 1 out of 41 sampled residents, that the facility did not provide routine and emergency drugs and biologicals to its residents. Specifically, a resident did not receive her morning dose of Metoprolol due to the medication being out of stock. Resident identifier 37.Findings included:Resident 37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which consisted of essential hypertension and chronic kidney disease stage 3.On 6/24/25 at approximately 8:00 AM, an observation was made of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 1 during morning medication administration for resident 37. LPN 1 did not administer resident 37's scheduled Metoprolol due to the medication not being available.Resident 37's medical records were reviewed.On 11/26/24, resident 37 had an order initiated for Metoprolol Tartrate Oral Tablet 50 milligram (mg), give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for hypertension. The order documented that the medication was scheduled to be administered during…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined, for 1 of 4 residents sampled, that the facility did not ensure that medication error rates were not 5 percent or greater. Specifically, observations were made of 4 medication errors out of 32 medication opportunities that resulted in a medication error rate of 12.5%. A resident's Metoprolol administration was missed due to the medication not being available from the pharmacy, and a Farxiga, Oxycodone, and Potassium Citrate Extended Release tablets were administered crushed and the manufacturer recommended to take the medications whole. Resident identifier: 37.Findings included:Resident 37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which consisted of sarcoidosis, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, anxiety disorder, obstructive sleep apnea, monoclonal gammopathy, type 2 diabetes mellitus, cognitive communication deficit, dysphagia, essential hypertension, chronic kidney disease stage 3, and low back pain.On 6/24/25 at approximately 8:00 AM, an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment or to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, during hallway meal pass, CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistant) did not sanitize their hands between delivery of meal trays to residents dining in their rooms. Additionally, desserts were not covered on the trays delivered to resident rooms.Findings included:On 6/24/25 at 1:13 PM, CNA 5 delivered a tray to room [ROOM NUMBER]. The resident refused the tray so the tray was returned to the cart. CNA 5 did not sanitize her hands after returning the cart. On 6/24/25 at 1:14 PM, CNA 5 delivered a tray to room [ROOM NUMBER]. The dessert was not covered on the tray. CNA 5 obtained another tray from the cart without sanitizing her hands and delivered a second tray to room [ROOM NUMBER]. The dessert was not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview it was determined for 6 of 20 sample residents, that the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source, were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made to the State Survey Agency (SSA). Specifically, entity reports of multiple abuse allegations were not submitted to the SSA in a timely manner. Resident identifiers: 9, 25, 43, 46, 124 and 225. Findings include: 1. Resident 225 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included acute diastolic congestive heart failure, type II diabetes, athreosclerotic heart disease, chronic pain syndrome, anxiety, gout, muscle weakness and dysphagia. Resident 225's medical record was reviewed on 7/11/23. A nursing progress note dated 7/6/23 at 1:39 PM documented, Resident had C/O [complained of] pain to Left wrist. PA [Physician Assistant] evaluated resident and orders given to obtain L [left]…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in UT