Pinnacle Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

64.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 212 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 81.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 76 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.75 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 93% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 56.0 residents a day — about 56% occupied, or roughly 44 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.54 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.31 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.12 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.96 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.78 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.49 to 0.87 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that services provided met professional standards of quality. Specifically, for 1 out of 30 sampled residents, a resident's nasogastric (NG) tube feed did not have the formula bag labeled with the complete date and time of the administration. Resident identifier: 54.Resident 54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, cerebral palsy, unspecified dysphagia, unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition, and cachexia. Resident 54's medical record was reviewed 1/26/26 through 1/29/26. On 1/25/26, resident 54's physician ordered an Enteral Feed every shift continuous tube feeding Jevity 1.2 with a rate of 30 mL (milliliter) an hour continuously for 24 hours. On 1/26/26 at 12:10 PM, an observation was made of resident 54's tube feed. The tube feed bag was labeled, 1/26 [two letter initials]. On 1/28/26 at 9:51 AM, an interview was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) 1. RN 1 stated that resident 54 was on a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, the facility must ensure that a resident's abilities in ADLs do not diminish unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrates that diminution was unavoidable. This includes ensuring the resident is provided the necessary care and services to maintain personal hygiene. Specifically 1 of 30 residents sampled, the facility failed to provide timely incontinence care after staff were notified of a soiled condition, resulting in the resident remaining in soiled clothing for one hour and 44 minutes. Resident identifier: 13 Resident 13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, muscle weakness, and dementia.On 1/26/26 at 11:55 AM, an observation was made of resident 13 with soiled pants being assisted into room [ROOM NUMBER]. A staff member talked into their earpiece stating the resident needed assistance with a brief change. A continuous observation of resident 13 was then initiated.On 1/26/26 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that all residents received the treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. Specifically, for 1 out of 30 sampled residents, staff were not monitoring changes in skin conditions with a resident or documenting bandage changes. Resident identifier: 50.Resident 50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, Type 2 Diabetes and restless leg syndrome. Resident 50's medical record was reviewed 1/26/26 through 1/29/26. On 1/26/26 at 2:31 PM, a concurrent interview and observation was conducted with resident 50. Resident 50 stated that he had open sores on his lower leg and that he had them for at least a week. Resident 50 stated that he had informed a nurse a week ago and she had put bandages on his legs, but that he was bleeding through the bandages onto his socks. It should be noted that there was no documentation regarding any leg wounds, or treatment for the wounds for resident 50.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents who were continent of bladder received services and assistance to maintain continence unless his or her clinical condition was or became such that continence was not possible to maintain. Specifically, for 1 out of 30 sampled residents, the resident was given a PureWick external catheter without an order or directions for use. Resident identifier: 53. Resident 53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, unsteadiness on feet, difficulty in walking, and muscle weakness. Resident 53's medical record was reviewed 1/26/26 through 1/29/26. On 1/26/26 at 1:44 PM, a concurrent interview and observation was made of resident 53 and her room. There was a suction canister on the bedside table with a suction tube that contained a dark amber fluid. Resident 53 stated that she was continent when she came to the facility, but was non-weight bearing for a few weeks and was given a PureWick catheter to use…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0711 — isolated
  Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility did not ensure that the physician reviewed the resident's total program of care, including medications and treatments during visits. Specifically, for 1 out of 30 sampled residents, the physician did not include an evaluation of the resident's condition and total program of care, including medications and treatments, and a decision about the continued appropriateness of the resident's current medical regimen. Resident identifier: 53. Resident 53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, unsteadiness on feet, difficulty in walking, and muscle weakness. Resident 53's medical record was reviewed 1/26/26 through 1/29/26. A review of resident 53's progress notes revealed: a. On 12/4/25 at 3:23 PM, a nursing note documented, Resident was seen by [Name redacted]. b. On 1/13/26 at 5:26 PM, a nursing note documented, [Name redacted] in to see resident. MD [medical doctor] reviewed labs, medication and answered all questions.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, for 1 out of 30 sampled residents, Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) were not worn for a resident with a Nasogastric (NG) feeding tube and the end of the NG tube was uncapped and touching an intravenous pole. Resident identifier: 54. Resident 54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, cerebral palsy, unspecified dysphagia, unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition, and cachexia. Resident 54's medical record was reviewed 1/26/26 through 1/29/26. On 1/26/26 at 11:39 AM, an observation was made of resident 54. Resident 54 had an EBP sign on the door. On 1/26/26 at 2:52 PM, an observation was made of resident 54. Resident 54's tube feeding was beeping with a status of inactive. One end…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, it was determined for 22 of 33 that the facility did not treat each resident with respect and dignity. Specifically, the facility did not serve residents sitting at the same table in the dining room at the same time. Resident identifiers: 3, 4, 6, 10, 11, 13, 16, 22, 26, 27, 29, 31, 32, 34, 37, 38, 41, 42, 154, 156, 205 and 206. Findings include: 1. A dining observation was conducted on 11/28/23 at 10:21 AM. The following was observed: a. There were multiple tables placed together to make a large table in the middle of the dining room. Residents were observed to be served at different times. Resident 10 and resident 13 were served at 10:43 AM. Resident 31 and resident 11 were served at 10:49 AM. Resident 16 was observed to be served at 10:51 AM. Resident 29 was served at 10:52 AM. Resident 26 was observed to enter the dining room at 10:52 AM and was served at 10:54 AM. Resident 3 was observed to be served at 10:58 AM. It should be noted there was a 15 minute difference between the first resident served and the last resident at the same table. 2. A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 1 of 33 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that the resident right to self-administer medications was clinically appropriate and safe. Specifically, a resident was observed to have medications on the bedside table and was not evaluated to determine if they were safe to self-administer medications. Resident identifiers: 156. Findings included: Resident 156 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included osteomyelitis, Type 2 diabetes with foot ulcer, lymphedema, and cellulitis of right lower limb. On 11/27/23 at 12:57 PM, an observation was made of resident 156's room. There were three medication bottles observed on resident 156's bedside table. On 11/27/23 at 3:33 PM, a follow-up observation was made of resident 156's room. The three medications on resident 156's bedside table were the following: a. Bean-O b. Lactase Supplement c. Equate Gas Relief (simethicone 125 mg) Resident 156's medical record was reviewed on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review it was determined, for 1 of 33 sampled residents, the facility did not allow resident the right to request, refuse and/or discontinue treatment and to formulate an advanced directive. Specifically, a resident's Provider Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) form did not match in their electronic medical record. Resident identifiers:156. Findings included: Resident 156 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included osteomyelitis, Type 2 diabetes with foot ulcer, lymphedema, and cellulitis of right lower limb. Resident 156's medical record was reviewed on [DATE]. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented that resident 156 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14. A BIMS score of 13 to 15 indicated cognition was intact. The Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) dated [DATE] was reviewed and marked as Do Not Resuscitate (DNR). Resident 76's Medication Administration Record (MAR) was reviewed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined, the facility did not ensure that services provided met professional standards of quality. Specifically, for 1 of 33 sampled residents, orders were being checked off as completed for catheter care when a catheter had been discontinued. Resident identifier: 31. Findings included: Resident 31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included sepsis, urinary tract infection, unspecified kidney failure, disorders of peripheral nervous system, acidosis, and hyperkalemia. On 11/27/23 at 12:54 PM, an observation was made of resident 31 laying in bed, there was no Foley catheter bag hanging on his bed or near resident. Resident 31's medical record was reviewed on 11/27/23. Review of resident 31's physician's orders revealed the following: a. Catheter care q (every) shift with a start date of 11/10/23. A review of resident 31's November 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Catheter care q shift…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $732K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in UT