City Creek Post Acute

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 39 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 56.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.51 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 82% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents. Specifically, for 1 out of 43 sampled residents, one resident sustained a third-degree burn to his left wrist from spilling a prepackaged soup prepared and served by facility staff. Resident identifier: 3.It was determined the provider's non-compliance with the requirements of participation had caused harm. The harm was related to the State Operations Manual, Appendix PP, S483.25(d)(2) Each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents, F689, at a scope and severity of G. However, based on the facility's corrective actions and a review of its current compliance in this regulatory area, the deficiency was determined to be past noncompliance.The facility developed and implemented a corrective action plan before the survey start date. The facility's corrective action plan, which was developed and implemented by 3/11/26 included the following…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · G2022-05-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 2 of 23 sample residents, that each resident did not have the right to be free from abuse. Specifically, a resident was threatened by a roommate and there was no investigation to rule out abuse. Resident identifier: 33 and 89. Findings include: Resident 33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia without behavioral disturbance, major depressive disorder, personal history of transient ischemic attack, diabetes, and cerebral infarction. On 5/2/22 at 9:11 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 33. Resident 33 stated her roommate tried to kill her. Resident 33 stated that her roommate told her that she was going to stab her. Resident 33 stated she was unable to sleep at night. Resident 33 stated that her roommate was not at the facility very long. Resident 33's medical record was reviewed on 5/3/22. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed resident 33 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2022-05-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 23 sample residents, the facility did not ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and residents' choices. Specifically, a resident was not treated for a urinary tract infection (UTI). Resident identifier: 38. Findings include: Resident 38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and with diagnoses which included urinary tract infection, acute respiratory failure, wedge compression fractures, diabetes mellitus, and asthma. Resident 38's medical record was reviewed on 5/4/22. A physician's order dated 4/7/22 revealed Urine Analysis (UA) with reflux culture patient was having urine retention and may perform straight catheter to obtain culture. The urine analysis and culture were not located in resident 38's medical record. The Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) provided the UA with reflux culture dated 4/7/22. The form was flagged as abnormal.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility did not store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, a Bluetooth speaker was stored on a shelf used to store items used in food preparation and a male staff member with a beard was observed to be preparing food without wearing a beardnet. Findings included:On 3/23/26 at 8:02am an initial observation was conducted of the facility kitchen. There was a Bluetooth speaker sitting on a shelf used to store hotel pans used for meal preparation.On 3/25/25 at 11:31am a follow up observation was conducted of the facility kitchen. [NAME] 1 was observed to have a beard. [NAME] 1 was not wearing a beard net while preparing enchiladas that were to be served to residents at lunch. On 3/26/26 at 8:36am, an interview was conducted with the Dietary Manager (DM). The DM stated that she would purchase beard nets for the male staff member that was not wearing a beard net while preparing food. The DM also stated that she would move the bluetooth speaker to an area of the kitchen…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment, and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, for 3 out of 43 sampled residents, staff did not wear personal protective equipment (PPE) when residents were on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) and hand hygiene was not performed during wound care. Resident identifiers: 14, 73, and 74.Findings included:1. Resident 14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, encephalopathy. On 3/23/26 at 2:21 PM, EBP signage was observed on the door frame and a PPE cart was observed outside of resident 14's room. A care plan Focus documented [name redacted] has potential for pressure ulcer development r/t [related to] Limited mobility d/t [due to] Parkinson's, Encephalopathy and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-30 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that when they transferred or discharged a resident that it was documented in the resident's medical record and that the information contained the contact information of the practitioner responsible for the care of the resident; resident representative information; Advanced Directive information; all special instructions for ongoing care; comprehensive care plan goals; and all other necessary information to ensure a safe and effective transition of care. Specifically, for 1 of 43 sampled residents, the facility did not document in the residents' medical record the information that was given to the receiving provider when the resident was transferred to the hospital. Resident identifier: 9. Findings included: Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included calculus of bile duct, urinary tract infection (UTI), pneumonia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, systemic inflammatory response syndrome,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-30 · tag F0700 — isolated
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that when a bed rail was utilized that the resident was assessed for the risk of entrapment from the bed rail prior to installation. Specifically, for 1 out of 43 sampled residents, the facility did not evaluate a resident for entrapment from the bed rail prior to use and the resident reported that her hand was caught in the bar. Resident identifier: 65. Findings included: Resident 65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included secondary malignant neoplasm of the brain, malignant neoplasm of the left breast, disorders of bone density, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebrovascular accident, seizures, weakness, thyrotoxicosis, adjustment disorder with anxiety, and depressed mood. On 3/23/26 at 11:13 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 65 and their representative. Resident 65 stated that she fell off the bed and her hand was caught in the side bar. Resident 65's representative stated that he…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-30 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that each resident received food that accommodated the resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences. Specifically, for 1 out of 43 sampled residents, the facility did not provide the resident with the food preferences as outlined on their meal ticket. Resident identifier: 8. Finding included: Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included severe protein-calorie malnutrition, cachexia, hypokalemia, hypotension, acute kidney failure, hypomagnesemia, depression, and pain. On 3/24/26 at 8:12 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 8. Resident 8 stated that he was on hospice for malnutrition and met with the Registered Dietician regularly. Resident 8 stated that the kitchen never followed the instructions for his meals. Resident 8 stated that last night's dinner was a salad and he could not digest any leafy green vegetables. Resident 8 stated that he had to order food out…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and observation, the facility did not ensure that the resident environment remained as free of accidents as possible. Specifically, the laundry room was left open with no staff present; the laundry room was observed to have various chemicals inside. Findings include: On 1/29/24 at 10:43 AM, an observation was made of the first floor laundry room. The laundry room door was cracked open and no staff were located inside the laundry room. An observation was made of several chemicals located on the clean side of the laundry room which included: 4 containers of Febreeze fabric refresher, 7 containers of Comet disinfecting sanitizing bathroom cleaner, 2 bottles of broad range quaternary sanitizer and 2 containers of disinfecting all purpose spray and glass cleaner. Several of the warning labels located on the containers stated to keep out of reach of children and may be harmful if swallowed. Another observation of the door between the clean and dirty laundry room was made. The door had a sign which read this door must not be propped open. That door was found to be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 37 sampled residents, that the facility failed to ensure that a resident with urinary incontinence, based on the resident's comprehensive assessment received appropriate treatment and services to restore continence to the extent possible. Specifically, a resident who was incontinent of bladder and was assessed to be a likely candidate for a toileting program was not provided treatment and services to achieve as much normal bladder function as possible. Resident identifier: 10. Findings include: Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus type 2, congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, respiratory failure with hypoxia, atrial flutter, major depressive disorder, and right leg below the knee amputation. On 1/23/24 at 10:16 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 10. Resident 10 stated she used a brief for bladder incontinence and that she wished she was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, appropriated signage was not placed outside resident rooms identifying the need for transmission-based precautions (TBP), staff were observed in a patient's isolation room without personal protective equipment (PPE) and unvaccinated COVID-19 newly admitted residents were not put on TBP. In addition, staff did not wear appropriate eye protection (goggles or face shields) when interacting with residents and visitors were observed to enter the facility through a back entrance on the second floor and walk down a hallway past residents prior to performing the COVID-19 screening process. Resident Identifiers: 88, 138 and 193. Findings include: 1. Resident 193 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-05-04 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — pattern
  Perform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 5 out of 6 sampled staff, that the facility did not conduct testing based on parameters set forth by the Secretary. Specifically, routine testing of unvaccinated staff members, based on community transmission, was not completed. Findings include: On 5/5/22, the Operations Manager (OM) provided the vaccination status of facility staff. Staff member (SM) 1, SM 2, SM 3, SM 4, SM 5 and SM 6. SM 1, SM 3, SM 4, SM 5, and SM 6 had Religious Objections to the COVID-19 vaccination. SM 2 did not have an exemption. The county transmission rate provided by the facility revealed the following: a. 4/4/22 rate was 3.27% indicating weekly COVID-19 testing, b. 4/11/22 rate was 4.07% indicating weekly COVID-19 testing, c. 4/18/22 rate was 5.36% indicating weekly COVID-19 testing, d. 4/25/22 rate was 6.63% indicating twice weekly COVID-19 testing, e. 5/2/22 rate was 11.28% indicating twice weekly COVID-19 testing. COVID-19 testing was reviewed and SM 1 was tested on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-05-04 · tag F0888 — pattern
  Ensure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined the facility did not develop and implement policies and procedures to ensure that all staff were fully vaccinated for Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19). The facility did not ensure that the policies and procedures applied to individuals who provided care, treatment, or other services for the facility and/or its residents, under contract or by other arrangement. Also, the facility did not implement policies and procedures that included, at a minimum, a process for ensuring the implementation of additional precautions, intended to mitigate the transmission and spread of COVID-19, for all staff who were not fully vaccinated for COVID-19. Specifically, the facility was unaware and did not keep documentation of the vaccination status for their contracted staff. In addition, an unvaccinated staff member was not wearing the appropriate personal protective equipment according to the facility's policy and procedures. Findings include: On 5/4/22 at 3:04 PM, an observation was made of Staff member (SM) 3. SM 3 was observed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $794K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in UT