St. George Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 83 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 88.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 60 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.71 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 92% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 96.5 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.53 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.84 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.97 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.04 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.72 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.90 to 0.67 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in a sanitary manner for 1 of 2 nourishment refrigerators and 1 of 1 kitchen. Specifically, the staff failed to date foods brought in from visitors to be stored in the nourishment refrigerators and discard opened food items that were undated and had been in the nourishment refrigerators for an indeterminate amount of time. Additionally, the staff failed to change gloves and wash their hands after touching high-contact surfaces and before touching food items. This had the potential to affect 96 of 96 residents who received food from the dietary department. Findings included: 1. A facility policy titled, [Facility Name] Policy / Procedure, revised 11/2016. specified, Food or beverage brought in from outside sources for storage in facility pantries, refrigeration units, or personal/resident room refrigeration units will be monitored by designated facility staff for food safety. An undated facility policy titled, Food Storage, specified, Leftover food is stored in covered…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, document review, and policy review, the facility failed to protect residents' rights to be free from verbal abuse and physical abuse by staff and by a resident for 2 (Resident #33 and Resident #47) of 13 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. On 08/21/2023, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #29 was heard by staff to verbally abuse Resident #47. In addition, Resident #145 physically abused Resident #33 on two occasions, on 04/17/2024 resulting in knuckle marks to the resident's forehead and on 04/28/2024 resulting in scratches to the resident's face. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Abuse: Prevention of and Prohibition Against, revised in 02/2024, indicated, It is the policy of this Facility that each resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation. The policy specified, Abuse is the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, document review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of verbal abuse was reported immediately to the Administrator for 1 (Resident #47) of 13 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. Specifically, on 08/21/2023 at approximately 7:00 PM/8:00 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 27 and CNA #28 heard Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #29 verbally abuse the resident; however, the staff did not report the allegation of abuse to the Administrator until 10:15 PM. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Abuse: Prevention of and Prohibition Against, revised in 02/2024, indicated, 1. All allegations of abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, or exploitation should be reported immediately to the Administrator. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #47 on 07/28/2022. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of dementia with behavioral disturbance, anxiety disorder, and need for assistance with personal care. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-07 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, document review, and policy review, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy for 2 (Resident #47 and Resident #395) of 13 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. Specifically, the facility failed to remove the accused staff member rom care of any resident after staff reported to the Administrator they heard Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #29 verbally abuse Resident #47 on 08/21/2023. The facility also failed to interview the alleged perpetrator and other residents when it was alleged that Resident #396 poked Resident #395 in the breast in the hallway on 04/09/2023. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Abuse: Prevention of and Prohibition Against, revised in 02/2024, indicated, 2. After receiving the allegation, and during and after the investigation, the Administrator will ensure that all residents are protected from physical and psychosocial harm. Per the policy, 4. All allegations of abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation will be promptly and thoroughly investigated by the Administrator or his/her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop a care plan to address the supplemental oxygen usage for 2 (Resident #37 and Resident #76) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for respiratory care. Findings included: An undated facility policy titled, Care Planning, indicated, It is the policy of this facility that the interdisciplinary team (IDT) shall develop a comprehensive care plan for each resident and care plans will be updated as necessary with resident changes to help promote optimal care to the resident. 1. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #37 on 09/05/2023. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of acute respiratory failure with hypoxia and chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/02/2024, revealed Resident #37 received oxygen therapy. Resident #37's Order Summary Report, for active orders as of 06/04/2024, revealed an order dated 09/05/2023, for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to revise the care plan to include added new interventions after a fall for 1 (Resident #86) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for accidents. Findings included: An undated facility policy titled, Care Planning, indicated, It is the policy of this facility that the interdisciplinary team (IDT) shall develop a comprehensive care plan for each resident and care plans will be updated as necessary with resident changes to help promote optimal care to the resident. The policy indicated, 7. Care plans will be updated with resident changes to promote optimal resident care. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #86 on 03/29/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke) due to embolism of right middle cerebral artery and essential primary hypertension (high blood pressure). An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/05/2024, revealed Resident #86 had a Brief…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow a physician's order to hold a nicotine patch when the resident was smoking for 1 (Resident #86) of 4 sampled residents reviewed accidents. Findings included: An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #86 on 03/29/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of cerebral infarction (a stroke) due to embolism of right middle cerebral artery and essential primary hypertension (high blood pressure). An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/05/2024, indicated Resident #86 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Resident #86's care plan, initiated on 04/16/2024, indicated the resident had the potential for injury related smoking. Resident #86's Medication Administration Record [MAR], for June 2024, revealed a transcription of an order dated 05/22/2024, for nicotine patch 24 Hour, 7 milligrams…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-07 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of manufacturer's information, the facility failed to ensure they maintained a medication error rate of less than 5 percent (%). The facility had 2 errors out of 34 opportunities, resulting in a medication error rate of 5.88 %, affecting 1 (Resident #14) of 3 residents observed during medication administration. Findings included: An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #14 on 03/04/2021. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis of type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy. Resident #14's Order Summary Report, listing active orders as of 06/07/2024, contained an order, dated 07/25/2023, for insulin glargine subcutaneous solution 100 units per milliliter (units/mL), inject 75 units subcutaneously every morning and at bedtime for type two diabetes mellitus. The Order Summary Report also contained an order, dated 03/04/2021, for NovoLog Solution 100 units/mL, inject as per sliding scale (a progressive increase in insulin dose, based upon predefined blood…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-01-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined, for 4 of 24 sampled residents, that the facility did not provide each resident with a safe, clean homelike environment. Specifically, a resident had plastic in the corner of her room where the roof had leaked, there were gashes in the drywall behind a resident's bed, wheelchair was soiled, and rooms had trash and debris on the floor. Resident identifiers: 8, 28, 73 and 128. Findings included: 1. On 1/9/23 at 4:16 PM, resident 73 was interviewed. Resident 73 stated that approximately 1 week ago, it had rained and that the wall and ceiling near the window had leaked water. Resident 73 stated that the maintenance stopped by and told her the room was being looked at. Resident 73 stated that the ceiling and wall leaked one more time a few days after the initial leak. Resident 73 stated the facility did not offer a room change. An observation was made of resident 73's room, room [ROOM NUMBER]. The ceiling and wall in the corner of resident 73's room was covered…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-01-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 24 sample residents, that a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition. Specifically, a Speech Language Pathologist (SLP) wrote a physician's order to provide a resident with maximum assistance with eating and the resident was observed to be eating in her room without assistance. Resident identifier: 127. Findings include: Resident 127 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses which included displaced intertrochanteric fracture of right femur, dysphagia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, major depressive disorder, anxiety and scabies. On 1/10/23 at 10:00 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 127's family member. The family member stated resident 127 had lost a lot of weight. The family member stated Registered Nurse (RN) 1 told her that resident 127 fed herself. The family member stated that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in UT